The biggest blackpill is actually having a loving father, brother, boyfriend, etc. Because then you see the ultimate expression of male benevolence, and how it remains a moral failure. Male love is generally patronizing. And even then, you see how it values you only because you are genetically related or going to produce more genetic relations, and contrast that with how it perceives any other random woman on the planet. It only sees you as respectable because you're NLOG. Not like those other girls that they feel entitled to exploit. Male love is always based on NLOG which is why female self-esteem also generally centered around that principle. There is the idea that if you're prettier or more competent you might escape the fate of field/street slaves.

Linkola was maybe right when he supposed that nyggers were stupid rather than evil. I don't even believe that every single nygger is an agent of inexplicable, unfathomable cruelty. Some moids relish the idea that they are regarded as a force that can't be reasoned with, and therefore cannot be contained, by radical feminists. Sorry moids, you're not that relevant. Evil is the domain of women. y-chromot*rds are just animals, some kind of natural phenomenon beyond abstract concepts of ethics.

As for the males who are different, I believe they can exist but there is nothing I am going to do about it. The reasonable radical feminist stance would be to acknowledge that it's not that all rape apes are evil but none of them can help us in the end, nor should we expect them to. It's like you want them all to be inhumanly evil as a prerequisite for engaging in the female power process. Almost as if any of them were to have your interests at heart, you would drop your sword and kiss and make up. Because you don't actually want to be an autonomous agent. You just want rape apes to be nice to you. If a male was somehow miraculously Not Like Other Males, there's really nothing I can do to help them and it doesn't change what I know about the world.