BeamBrain1

@BeamBrain1

BeamBrain #moonbat

You brought up Churchill. Why don’t we see what he was up to while the Holocaust was going on?

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/29/winston-churchill-policies-contributed-to-1943-bengal-famine-study

“Rice stocks continued to leave India even as London was denying urgent requests from India’s viceroy for more than 1m tonnes of emergency wheat supplies in 1942-43. Churchill has been quoted as blaming the famine on the fact Indians were 'breeding like rabbits', and asking how, if the shortages were so bad, Mahatma Gandhi was still alive.”

The Indian famine killed 3 million, yet western liberals celebrate its architect as a hero. Do you see how this might give someone the idea that liberals place very little value on the lives of people who aren’t white Europeans?

@Zinnia #154877

“pre-WW2”? The US was still forcibly sterilizing Puerto Ricans in the 50s. Canada didn’t repeal the Sexual Sterilization Act until 1972, and Sweden didn’t end its eugenics program until 1976.

@Anon-e-moose #154857

You mean the Churchill who oversaw the Bengal Famine that killed 3 million people? Who called Indians a “a beastly people with a beastly religion”? Yes, he’s a liberal, and the fact that he’s celebrated proves my point: liberals are fine with genocidal mass murderers as long as they’re not killing white Europeans.