[From "Nations Need Kings According to the Mind and Example of Christ the King"]

Although there were certainly more than a handful of potentates who[…]did not fulfill their duties to rule according to the mind of Christ the King[…], many others did so heroically as they took seriously their Coronation Oath[…]
The framers of the Constitution of the United States of America[…]made the text of their document’s own words as the only basis for law, justice, and peace[…]
Holy Mother Church required the kings of Christendom to cut off the “mass of iniquity,” not to seek a “consensus” with it.[…]Absent the Holy Faith[…]men must descend to the depths of depravity, including the advance of every manner of wickedness that[…]might even have put the residents of Sodom and Gomorrha to shame
[…]
There is no room for effeminacy in the life of a ruler. There is NO ROOM for effeminacy in the life of a priest.
[…]
Yes, the keenness of the mind is blunted by the sort of bodily pleasures that Donald John Trump and almost everyone else in the farce of naturalism that continues to unfold before us, including his fiercest opponents in the Democratic Party, have partaken throughout the course of their adult lives.
[…]
When was the last time you heard someone in public life citing the example of Saint Henry the Emperor or Saint Edward the Confessor[…]as the example of civil leadership[…]? No, candidates for public office cite the "plaster saints" of Modernity who reject the Social Reign of Christ[…], believing in the "sovereignty of the people"
[…]
We are so far from a detestation of perverse sins and so ignorant of the holiness and virtues necessary for a just civil ruler that even most Catholics[…]are willing to “overlook” the president’s overtures to practitioners of perversity