(in response to “Sexual trafficking is the real incel rebellion / beta uprising.”, quoted here )
@Iamnothere000
(cucked disclaimer: everything below is just theoretical rambling, I’m a good boy who respects women, I promise)
TL;DR: The real incel rebellion is the constantly increasing sexual trafficking.
About 70% of trafficking victims are female.
https://www.dosomething.org/us/facts/11-facts-about-human-trafficking
Where you err OP is that most "sex trafficking" is actually women voluntarily coming here to be whores, and then they just cry victim to avoid accountability for their actions to get preferential treatment.
Even though they were never kidnapped/enslaved, by falsely accusing their helpful pimps of doing this, they interfere with further influx of prostitutes to compete in their market.
You are just white-knighting for them OP. :soy:
2 comments
Helpful pimps? Yeah, they HELP themselves to most of the income their “stable” bring in.
VERY few people are prostitutes out of completely free choice. Quite a lot are rape survivors. Some are addicts of some form or other. Some are forced into prostitution by a spouse or parent. For some, it’s a self-injury behavior. Many do it to be able to feed their children. Those who really choose it voluntarily are seldom street-prostitutes, but mostly high-end call-girls.
Sometimes, when supposed “sex-workers” promote prostitution, it’s the pimps and traffickers that self-designate as “sex-workers”.
Sex trafficking is one of the largest criminal businesses in the world. The few who dare press charges against traffickers or pimps won’t make any difference. Most wont dare, as they might be killed or trafficked somewhere much worse.
White Knighting?
White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, one of the most violent and militant branches of the Ku Klux Klan
Yeah, sounds REALLY “soy”, doesn’t it, dearie?
I’m pretty sure the concept of a white knight predates the KKK and that’s something they appropriated from earlier medieval culture.
I imagine amongst pimps you’ll find many who are abusive the way you imply (taking way too many of the proceeds). At the same time, there might be some who are just glorified bodyguards who are there to protect a sex worker from abusive clients and make sure clients pay.
IE stuff you wouldn’t need if sex work were legalized because then police could do more to serve in that role for independent contractors.
The idea of “completely free choice” is an illusion, since probably the majority of people work in jobs which they’re prefer to give up for leisure or an easier job if they could find that alternative. The need for money is a coercive force in all occupational choices.
I acknowledge that there are people pressured to work by someone abusive, and who have histories with addiction. You’ll find this in many occupations beyond sex work though, like working in fast food.
I don’t think exploitive pimps would actually want sex work legalized because then they wouldn’t be able to use the illegality to monopolize the protection racket.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.