KierHamm

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Women are not responsible to train worthless sperm wagons to mimic human decency. The best and most moral thing to do when confronted with selfish, exploitative sperm wagons is to just let them wither and die alone. You don’t train a parasite to not be one, you take away its blood supply and let it die. The parasite is gone, and has none to replace it with, making another “responsibility” (burden) for women in the future.

[...]

He’s operating on selfish scrote logic, you and her operating on wishful-thinking mommy logic. Scrote logic trumps your mommy logic because his is the logic of a parasite, and yours is that of a generous host, trying to compel the parasite to kindness by offering your hide. Lmao.

[...]

Jesus Christ, how horrible. Sperm wagons don’t even deserve to be pissed on when they’re on fire. Look at you, both of you, giving him everything. It’s a crime against nature.

Anon #sexist #psycho original.lolcow.farm

I think children and the mentally retarded can be "groomed". Adults with sound intelligence should know better should they not? If women had the mentality of not allowing grooming and not allowing it to proceed in the first place in their own cut off personalized lives, and not trusting males it likely wouldn't be a thing right? How many women groom other women?; It's negligible. This is a massive blackpill if women stopped participating in trafficking it would cease to exist overnight. If women spoke up about grooming more and spoke honestly about it that males are predatory, and that grooming victims are retarded women with pickme brain rot being taken advantage of until it was something recognized by ape law, formally it may have the slightest bit of a punishment and deterrent for groomers and maybe these idiotic women who are groomed and victims to their own pickme programming would see it as a bad thing. But evidently most women don't see it as existing, consider males more valuable as groomers, or that it's not important enough because it only affects retarded women who put themselves in dangerous situations who have pickme brain rot to trust predatory rape apes. This is similiar to how the rape of partners is seen legally in honesty by males, where women are blamed for trusting apes because they should know better than to trust apes. Even man made law admit this caveat; if you trust rape apes you shouldn't be surprised when the ape rapes. Men admit this and remind women of this, men make any protection from them illegal or difficult to reach yet women still trust them. That's pure brainrot and masochism. If you want to call this slut shaming or victim blaming, sure. Sluts deserve to be shamed for their own masochism and you can't really be a victim if you've chosen to go down with the moid rape chimp ship, I'll remind that I'm only talking about women who are raped by their own trusted ape partners. An adult woman being "groomed" which I suppose is code for made into a brainrotted prostitute is incredibly pathetic, especially in a developed economy with safety nets.

Pass-da-baton #sexist tumblr.com

The vast majority of women are already living in their ideal world and in a self-imposed situation as close to their ideal life as possible. From gathering what libradbihetfems are lamenting about online, it's clear that all they want are some upgrades to the status quo. Some of which include:

being able to score a reformed moid her looksmatch who can give her lots of orgasms so she doesn't have to fake it anymore (source: online radfem whining) get the 1% of men that wear dresses to stop doing that because deep down she loves the gender dynamicbonus points for making single people subsidize child care costs and society coddle mothers even more than it already does

This list is obviously non-exhaustive. The point is I will not be lifting a finger for any of these causes. To radfem guilt tripping tactics like "the married normie woman that volunteers twice a week at a women's shelter is doing more for feminism than YOU", my only response is--Good, exactly as I intend.

#blackpill feminism

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

Be mindful of male PR and the limitations of your female perspective. You may genuinely be appalled by inequality, but he isn't. A sperm cell doesn't want sexual reproduction to cease, it just wants to get to the egg first. Males are designed for competition and rat racing, it's why they exist.

Any woke male is simply upset that he's not the top dog. Moids are not capable of truly despising hierarchies as a concept, they can only be resentful of their failure to thrive in them. Any 'theory' produced by them is simply an extended rationalization/PR.

Every mama's basement revolutionary wants to be the white capitalist republican pig Chad who gets to reproduce with white bitch Stacy. Because he secretly admires Chad yet desires Stacy, his anger will be reserved for Stacy whom he perceives as reserving her resources for a better male. She symbolizes the fact that he will never advance enough among other males to be selected by her.

In general, anger is a pretty good indicator of desire and deprivation in males. They always hate what they can't have, it's in their nature.

Elemental witch #sexist elementalwitch.wordpress.com

Men are a plague. They are biologically mutated females which have infiltrated every facet of life on the planet and infected it with a dis-ease. Patriarchy is a system which ensures males the ability to impregnate females against our will, thus forcing us to proliferate more males. This is the behavior of a parasite on a host. Patriarchy is the word to describe a global parasitic infection in which males are the parasites. Everything they latch onto suffers and slowly dies in agony, including women, animals, and the Earth, while men pursue their primary goals of survival via maximum energy consumption, expansion, and replicating themselves as many times as possible.

A parasite does not care if it kills the host, because it can just move on to another host. Women are the primary hosts of male vampirism, and our life force is sucked out of us to generate the fuel men need to further exploit and dominate the Earth.

I know, I know. Misandry.

Anon #sexist #transphobia lolcow.farm

Because all men by design have mommy issues, perpetually avenging a trauma inflicted by something known as "maternal omnipotence". All males resent it, but women don't due to their ability to become mothers themselves. Most of what we define as "masculine identity" is just a set of pitiful exercises at establishing oneself outside of mommy's oppressive power. Predictably, everything about this particular LARP revolves around men defining themselves entirely around women and "not being women" as though they ever could be them - another "a-actually I'm choosing this, it's not like I CAN'T do something you can" cope. [...]

You can't help but notice the obvious pussy envy and desire to switch places - males want women to be the easily coomditioned, expendable, sex addicted ones - groveling before the more valuable set of gonads. The ressentiment and envy of a disposable ballsack thus culminates in trooning out. Is it really surprising how obsessed AGPs are with the "mommy" narrative? AGP is the absolute pinnacle of male coping, something that's usually followed by surrender and death.

Males have no sexual fantasies, all they have is predictable eroticized copes. You can coom-meme them into anything including killing themselves, if you push the right buttons. They're not people, they're a malignant growth around their semen pustules.

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

[ Refering to Lundy Bancroft's "Why Does He Do That?", a book about tactics used by male abusers ]

lundy bancroft's book is brilliant, but it understandably doesn't explain why in a more global, all-encompassing, elegant sense. his book, as it should have, still left the nebulous possibility of "good men". a proper framework should explain why a value judgment like this cannot apply, that there's only a man that finds it useful or has the capacity to be abusive, and a man that doesn't.

their nature innately biases them towards perceiving prosociality/kindness as deference/submission. in a male mind, there's no need to be nice unless you have to be, and that can only happen because you're too weak to just take what you want. no matter how many phony layers of civilization and decorum they slap on top of this, even to the point of losing their own acute awareness of it, it still shines as bright as day and is most noticeable in pre-socialized males (toddler to elementary school age). they absolutely hate dealing with this between themselves of course, but they don't have the capacity to change even for their own sake - let alone women's. for a male, might is right.

ironically, by being staunch blank slatists feminists have lost their only ability to fashion males into the most convincing facsimile of a "good person" possible - removing any and all material power they hold over women would give them a selfish incentive to be nice (display submission).

Anon #sexist lolcow.farm

1. What males say they want and what they really want are two really different things. Pickmes never win.

2. Males' stated demands and standards are a) coping mechanisms of an inherently defective individual or b) attempts to dupe you. They know that they're using you and they will despise you for letting yourself be used. They are aware that their sexual role is inherently parasitic and destructive, so they are organically unable to respect women (or other men) who give in to their demands. In mammalian reproduction, sperm is the worthless gamete while the ovum is rich in resources. Due to this, males universally understand being given reproductive opportunity as a form of loss on the giver's part. Any claims otherwise are an attempt to negotiate a better arrangement (in which a male provides nothing in exchange for some abstract immeasurable benefit like "romantic love" while calculating the fuck out of cost/benefit on his end).

Anon #wingnut lolcow.farm

another subject you have been taught your whole life to feel uncomfortable about is fascism, the first political movement in the 20th century to unapologetically demand equal rights for women, female political representation, and the improvement of women’s socio-economical, intellectual and moral condition.
all scares about fascism are pathetic: there is no fascist movement today, because there is no genuine mass-feminist movement today. fascism preaches the subjugation of big businesses under the state, in service of the state, the rules of honor and dignity, and meritocracy, above the rules of money. which party in the world is trying to accomplish this? maybe the CCP if we wanted to be lenient…
there is a strong hunger for “fascism” in most people, even if the word itself is taboo, and this hunger is exploited by politicians and billionaires for their own benefits, without ever even trying to satisfy it, just as there is a true hunger for feminism that no one wants to satisfy.