Can analysis of movies and netflix be used to divine the future?
Two streamed series that were completed & ready for transmission just before the pandemic:
“Ghost in the Shell: SAC 2045″. And another that was commissioned specifically for a certain streaming company, made for such by Studio Trigger.
The first introduced us to a new concept: Sustainable War*. As for the other, I’ve yet to see the construction of a place specifically for a particular community: which, while that place is modern, could be considered a ghetto as it is designed to keep said community apart from the rest of humanity. Least of all those it was built to keep apart from humanity:
Those including a raccoon girl. And a man who - via his power to instantly transform, along with his unimaginable strength & immortality - is a werewolf.
…still, as that - “BNA: Brand New Animal” - was made for Netflix I guess those at a certain other company saw something else and said to it’s creator ’We’d like to be involved in something based on what you made that was merely a pilot on YouTube’. That being “Hazbin Hotel” streamed by Amazon.
We can therefore predict that there’ll be more animated series being streamed that aren’t just for kids, OP.
*-
Sustainable War is a game of chicken between major nations. Politicians who stink at negotiating and amateurs who don’t know how the game is played get swept in and spat out by the war machine
-Major Motoko Kusanagi (Atsuo Tanaka)
As John F. Kennedy was previously a war hero in WWII and his predecessor Dwight D. Eisenhower - whilst Supreme Commander of the Allies in Europe - was very much against what war represented to people, and the waste involved in such, in Soviet pre-Streaming Era TV predicts you.
Who would have predicted how things would ultimately go for both the Soviet Union & United States during & after the Cuban Missile Crisis?
And why we haven’t seen WWIII happen as a result of the Six Day War, least of all that nary 48 hours ago.
Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children
Even a Supreme Commander then Commander-in-Chief such as Eisenhower - previously a General - knew that war can’t be sustainable after all.
