[ Note: MAP is an acronym standing for MInor Attracted Person. ]

Cunny Defender : Anti-c MAPs are part of the problem Im 100% pro contact, and if you're not, then you're part of the problem. If two people mutually want to engage with each other, then that's it; it's none of your business. Some would say, "Oh, but children can't consent." First, what do you mean by "child"? Is it someone who is prepubescent or simply just someone under the age of 18? Either way, you would be wrong because the "magic age," also known as the "age of consent," is different in every damn country, most being under 18 and in some you can even marry prepubescent girls

G@yWad69 :

Isn't this part of the problem re. children's inability to consent, though? E.g. the fact that in these few remaining countries, they are considered chattel, very much not able to consent until they are "married off" and become the property of their husband according to religious norms?

But children CAN consent. Just because the law refuses to recognize their consent doesnt mean they cant. The law doesnt dictate reality, reality does. And how so you know that every single country that allows child marrige views children as chattel? America allows child marriage, do we view children as chattel? And if you are upset about wives being viewed as property of their husbands, that is not a problem of her being under the magical special number, that is a problem of mysogny and objectification. If he is a dick to her when she was under the magical special number then he would've been a dick to her over the magical special number. The problem is that he is a dick and views her as property, not that she hasn't reached the magical special number.