new

A lot of doubt has been cast on me in regards to my claims of being Asian. Many of you have told me that this is not the way an Asian speaks, this is not their modus operandi, Asians are not this pro-White, Asians do not always refer to the accomplishments made by Whites, etc.

So I would like to clarify why I am not White, yet can accept Whites as superior to Asians.

First of all, I am an honest person. I am more honest towards myself than I am to anyone else. So of course I will admit my faults, disadvantages, impairements, etc., whether it hurts my feelings or not. I like to assess the situation and recognize my weaknesses to calculate a strategy taking my faults into account; thus increasing my overall chances of success.

Secondly, it is the truth. The truth is the truth, whether it hurts you or not. If the truth did not hurt, no one would have any reason to lie. People lie because they want to avoid the truth. People shine lights to avoid the darkness. People use heat to avoid the cold. People use lies because they do not like the truth. The truth is never liked by anyone, yet it does not make a truth anymore less of a truth. The truth is the truth no matter what.

80,000 years ago, homo sapiens split into two populations; blacks and everyone who left Africa. 45,000 years ago, everyone who left Africa split into Australoids and Eurasians. 35,000 years ago, Eurasians split into Europeans and Asians.

Now tell me, if our races were evolving separately for 35,000 years, wouldn't it make sense to assume that they evolved entirely different traits? And when two compare two homologous traits, that one would be superior to the other?

Mutations occur in approximately 1 out of 10,000 base pairs during mitosis. Your gametes divide hundreds of times before they become sperm cells, and assuming a life span of 25-30 years for Paleolithic Proto-Eurasians, that is a lot of mutations proliferated to our divergent populations during that time.

Now between Asians and Whites, one is obviously superior, and you have a 50/50 chance of being born into the superior race. So obviously a lot of people will also be born into the inferior race. I am one of those people. Big deal.

Whites have undeniably proven themselves to be superior. East Asians within a duration of 4,500 years invented a hang glider, paper, horse spurrs, the crossbow, the first firearm, firecrackers, gunpowder, underwater explosives, the rocket, the toothbrush, the compass, and the printed currency, amongst many others. Now that seems impressive when you compare them to the achievements of the Mesopotamians, Mayans, or any other Arabic, Mesoamerican, Southeast Asian, or Anatolian civilization. However, European Whites, within a period of a mere 400 years invented cars, airplanes, machine guns, silicon electroconducting microchips, quantum physics, space travel, the steam engine, the Bessmer conversion method, the computer, TVs, GPS, space shuttles, nuclear fission, the microscope, the telescope, radar, and polyestherines, amongst many others. Now that is truly an impressive feat of display, and I tremble in awestruck revere when reading about the godlike achievements of the White race.

I consider only European Whites (Meds, Nordics, Slavs and Alpines/Dinarics) and Northeast Asians (Northern Chinese, Manchurians, Koreans, Japanese, Mongolians, Tibetians, and Oroquens) to be fully evolved modern humans. And I consider European Whites as intrinsically superior to Northeast Asians in almost every aspect except for cold adaptation.

I vehemenently oppose the destruction of the White race. I wish for Whites to be preserved for many generations to come. I want there to be beautiful White men and women in the future, who compose classical masterpieces such as Brahms, create majestic works of art, invent Promethean earth-shattering innovations such as Tesla did, and build society to progress.

I am with you White Nationalists 100%. Since I am an American, my primary alleigance is to White people, who created this nation. I may be biologically an Asian, but I am loyal to America before anything. I want to preserve the White race, and if there should ever be a upcoming conflict of races, you have my wholehearted support. White power!

So you're a mouth-breathing libtard and you find our claims about genocide confusing? We are here to help. With a bit of explanation, even you, an anti-White psychopathic cretin, can understand this simple concept that first-graders are easily able to latch on to.

1. What makes genocide undesirable?

To non-imbeciles, the answer to this question is completely obvious, but liberals have trouble with it. The undesirable aspect of genocide is the part about an ethnic category of people ceasing to exist. Think of it this way: You whining retards are always yammering about how much you love diversity. When an ethnic category of people ceases to exist, there is less diversity.

Still confused? Imagine that you have income in the form of welfare, food stamps, and drug money sales (to list three common sources of liberal income). If one of those goes away forever, you don't have as much income. It's not there anymore. It's gone.

Still confused? Please kill yourself!

2. What makes the disappearance of an ethnic category of people count as genocide?

The United Nations has a simple and logical answer to this (again obvious) question: Taking actions--including inflicting policies or conditions--that will bring about such a disappearance. If, for example, you stopped feeding your baby and it starved to death, you can be charged with its murder even if you protest that you "didn't kill it." That is because you inflicted conditions that you could see were in fact killing it.

Still confused? Suppose there was a race of people whose genetic traits were quite recessive such that when they mixed with other races, the children virtually always genetically grouped with the other race, and you flooded their homeland with other races and encouraged them to race-mix with those other races until all of them were mixed out of existence. You would then be inflicting conditions upon them calculated to bring about their disappearance.

This is precisely what is being done to the White race (among other things).

Still confused? So you don't think that should count as genocide even though proponents of multiculturalism admit freely and readily that they foresee a time when all humans have been cross-mixed to being "brown" such that there is never another White person anywhere on planet earth? Suppose there was a kind of bear that was white in color and could mix with another kind of bear that was brown, consistently producing offspring that were not white, and legislation was passed to try to prevent this from happening so the white bears would not go extinct. You should ask the legislators why they did that since you don't see what the big deal was, because this actually happened regarding polar bears and grizzly bears out of fear of "climate change."

The desire to save the White race from eventual extinction is a conservationist movement no different in intent from any other animal conservationist movement; therefore you should oppose all animal conservationist movements unless you are some kind of a fecophagic hypocrite.

Common tripping points for weak minds:

Many libtards become confused by the decrease of the White population and the average net reproductive rate (NRR) of the White race being below replacement level. They idiotically assert that this low rate is the "cause" of the anticipate disappearance of Whites, and not multiculturalist policies, even though they encourage race-mixing. The key to understanding this abecedarian error is being non-stupid enough to recognize what an "AVERAGE" is (and what it is not). An average is NOT the set-in-stone value for every member of the group. Some members will have higher values, and some lower. Most people have learned this elementary concept before their teen years.

In an all-White nation, it does not matter if the average NRR is below replacement level because the White race has historically shown a tendency to breed less when the population is high and more when it is low. Thus the falling population will eventually trigger the faster breeders to have more kids. In a mixed nation, however, the non-Whites never stop reproducing, so the population never falls and the Whites never pick up their breeding rate until they are gone. The White race is the ONLY race that historically shows such a pronounced ability to stabilize its population instinctively. All other races breed out of control until natural limitations (for example, disease, war, and famine) increase their death rate to compensate.

Quick facts for liberal morons:

The White race is the only race decreasing in absolute number on the planet.
The White race is decreasing as a fraction of the population in every nation in which it exists, including the lands to which it is indigenous.
The multiculturalists admit freely that their policies will exterminate the White race.
This extermination could be prevented easily.
The obliteration of the White race will decrease the diversity of the planet.
Extinction is forever.

Still okay with genocide?
Go find some White children and tell them that you look forward to the eternal end of people who look like them since you are so comfortable with the effects of multiculturalism. Then ask yourself what kind of human being you are.