new

I'm writing this because not only do I enjoy reveling in the schadenfreude and chagrin of your ilk, but I feel as though I'll be contributing something constructive to your forum rather than the usual irrelevant and mundane rubbish. Whether or not your moderators will approve this depends on how much confidence that your moderators have in you and the white nationalist/right wing dogma as a whole.

Let me get to the point: you've lost. And that everything to do with your leaders and ignorance. In fact, the only thing any of your leaders has ever gotten right, is the communist threat that is now more imminent than ever in your already increasingly socialized society (socialism being the pretext to communism).

Seventy years ago, communist ideologues planned how they'd deconstruct the west in order to impose their dictatorial system of control - America in particular.

There were two schools of thought. There were the reactionaries who maintained that a violent revolution was the only way to impose communism on a nation such as America. The other, more realistic school of thought, was that communists would infiltrate every aspect of society and transform it incrementally from within. As you can plainly see, the latter school of thought [has] prevailed.

The level of success that we've achieved over the past half century allows me to openly say what was once considered ideological suicide. It also allows me to critique your movement and the right wing/nationalist movement as a whole - which is exactly what I'm about to do.

Let me start by addressing the stated [white nationalist] claim that there's a Jewish or Zionist conspiracy. When I first read that, I couldn't stop laughing for several minutes (funny stuff). While you people have and continue to argue over the Jewish boogieman, you've been up against a communist conspiracy that has been taking place quietly behind the scenes the entire time. Of course, I anticipate the obligatory argument that communism is essentially a Jewish phenomenon, and in the most technical sense of the word that could be argued using anecdotal evidence; however, making that argument is akin to arguing what caused someone's cancer rather than taking the correct measures to stop it from metastasizing.

While a disproportionate amount of Jews were certainly at the forefront of the Bolshevik movement in Russia (the premise for your fallacious 'communism-is-Jewish' argument), communism later became with rife with antisemitism. Communist ideologues of many ethnic persuasions in the west saw the value of the anti-antisemitism taking hold in the former Soviet Union. So in an [ironic] twist, it was antisemitism that arguably served as the framework to developing a strategy of divide and conquer in the west.

Communist ideologues correctly hypothesized that by pitting diverse groups people against each other and empowering minority groups, they could create the social environment necessary to divide and conquer the white majority - while at the same time incrementally tearing away at the moral fabric that was holding your nations together (morality being the backbone of all successful societies).

In short: had your leaders been focused on the real enemy during and after the 1960s, your ideology quite possibly could have prevailed - at the very least, as far as the core tenets of traditional conservatism is concerned. The entire right wing movement has failed miserably because of ignorance, infighting, ideological divides and greed. White nationalism is merely one example of right wing ineptness.

I'll pause shortly, as I do not wish to waste much time on something that may not be posted. If this should be posted, I'm willing to continue this discussion and elaborate - but only with your more rational members. I will not respond to any reactionary nonsense. At the risk of sounding condescending, this post is more for your benefit. I say that knowing that you have been thoroughly defeated with absolutely no chance of ever morphing into any sort of viable threat.

Perhaps we could discuss how the left owns your children? Perhaps we could discuss how the average liberal or self-defined 'anti-racist' is nothing more than a well-meaning useful idiot, and how minorities have been used as pawns? Perhaps we could discuss the role of global corporatism and the international money handlers? Perhaps we could discuss the reality of the egalitarian illusion that those on the left have created?

Hello!

I am posting this in the 'opposing views' forum so that all sides have a chance to provide imput on the idea that has been forming in my mind about the opening up, (influx), of white colonization into the third world countries to bring developement to these areas.

I am posting this here because I want imput from WN forum members as well as viewpoints on this from any non-white, globalist corps advocates, anyone from ADL, SPLC, any jew, any politician, any law enforcement, etc, ANYONE!

I am not going to hide the fact that I am mad as hell at the flooding of non-whites into only the white countries, but if they intend to dilute our white countries like this with parasitic third worlders and expect those third world countries be preserved for corporate exploitation.

I am not at all against the stamping out of third world poverty but you are not going to do it by destroying the established developed white countries using the influx of non-white third worlders while inducing the obliteration of the white race genetically. If it's fair to colonized the White countries with non-white third worlders then it is fair for the opening of colonization of the white race into the non-white third world countries so that the white race can establish a global footprint and prosper from the natural rescources in thse third world countries.

By the expansion of white colonization into third world countries will expand opportunities for white race in the third world countries which will include prosperity for the white race for any who endeavor these last frontiers. It also will expand the global footprint of the white race and as the white race expands into these undeveloped frontiers they will bring developement into these areas which is the best possible way on earth to combat and stamp out global hunger and poverty.

Opening up white colonization into these undeveloped areas by no means should mean a hand out to third world non-white populations but they will this will bring opportunity for them in the form of work and they will be expected to work and be a part of the bringing of developement thus working to eliminate poverty in these countries.

From the research I have read, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and several other global key institutions as well as many globalist corporations all espouse that one of their main key goals are to eliminate global third world poverty, however those just mentioned seem to want to protect poor third world countries from white colonization into the third world countries. These world institutions have been espousing that their goal is for the elimination of global poverty for a long time but yet these areas remain undeveloped. At the same time these global institutions have also been directly behind the influxing of non-white third worlders into our established developed white countries.

The best way to end poverty in third world countries is to develope third the third world countries and to do that would be by opening up white colonization to begin setting up in those undeveloped countries.

Surely such an venturous endeavor would not be easy as it would be like venturing into a last frontier that would no dout have clashes from tribal savages much like was experienced when settlers came to America and as you would expect in settling and clearing out jungle wilderness that must happen to transform an undeveloped world into a developed world, but with that brings prosperity into these poor areas not only for whites but also for non-whites, thus is the best way to combat third world poverty.

We definitely see no hesitation for the promoting of non-white colonization into the white countries, but at the same time we see the deliberate forbiddance of white colonization into the undeveloped third world countries. The opening up of White colonization into global third world areas can only bring them up as they become developed.

I'm not talking of a loan of white technology from the white race to develope these undeveloped countries, to fix them up and then get out, I'm talking about according to historians and panthologists, and anthropologists, Africa and the Middle East were once the homelands of every White person on earth. Therefore according to those findings it is only fair that the white race, any who care to take the venture, have every right to move in and reclaim these homelands, and use and prosper from the exploitation of it's natural rescources which will bring prosperity right along with the developing of these undeveloped areas and at the same time spread and establish the white genetic footprint globally.

After all, does not the globalist corps and globalist politicians want globalization? Flooding only white countries with non-white third worlders into only white countries and preserving the natural rescources of third world countries for globalist corporate use is not globalization.

Let's hear it! I want feedback from all on this issue.