new

Obama has already said the 21 or 22 he will make it legal to have an abortion any time a woman may want it and up to an including actually giving birth.
The next thing he has said he will do is gay rights, and from what I understand that means marriage between men and men, and woman and woman. This will be nation wide and the states can do nothing about it.
He is going to do this by exective order from what I understand.
If he follows through on these and I think he will, I look for major events to happen in the United States very soon afterwards. Possibly the same day.
They could include earthquakes, in the great range, like high 8's or low 9's and could be even a middle to high nine. We could also expect to see weather related events, record cold nation wide, record snow or rain and floods, also volcanos. First thought Yellestone, but there are other places too. It is my prayer that these events don't happen, but I expect our GOD to let the United States know how he feels about these two so called rights and make a statement loud and clear. Also, HE could hold these events and strike Obama, or his family with sickness, accident or something clearly from GOD.
I know over the past few years when we have pushed Israel into a corner this country has had major events happen within a few days if not the same day. It is my prayer that we don't see any of these events, but my fear is that America will face a great judgement if Obama does these things.
Just my thoughts, but I do feel that we are going to pay a big price if he does these things.

Hi All.

Yes this add campaign is very sad indeed, but to me it has a twist if you read the words as they are presented. ( There is probably no God ) now that to me reads that as they have used the word ( probably ) that they have not got no ever could get absolute proof for there claim. So going off that little fact I think that if it is read as its presented, there add means absolutely nothing at all. They are saying there is probably no God, but any believer could answer that with, but you can not be sure as you as stating probably. Therefor it can also be stated then using there own logic, that there on the other hand could probably be a God & so to carry that on. If there could probably be a God, then it stands to reason that if there could well be a God, then its a good idea to accept him as such.

To me its Pascals wager all over again, for those who do not know of this here it is. ( Pascal wrote:

"If there is a God, He is infinitely incomprehensible, since, having, neither parts nor limits, He has no affinity to us. We are then incapable of knowing either what He is or if He is ... you must wager. It is not optional. You are embarked. Which will you choose then? Let us weigh the gain and the loss in wagering that God is. Let us estimate these two chances. If you gain, you gain all; if you lose, you lose nothing. Wager then without hesitation that he is." )

So as you can see by reading this wager, the adds that have been placed by these people mean nothing at all, but by using there own logic against them. They are in fact making the point that therefor there could probably by a God & if that is the case it puts you in a better position to believe in him than to not. As if you do believe in him you have everything to gain, but to not believe in him, you have everything to lose.

God Bless all
VoT

Sorry for this its just the way my mind works at times, kind of twisted as such. But it works for me!