new

Here's what the Libertarians need from the Alt-Right:

A realization that all their political values are doomed to irrelevancy under a democratic system considering mass immigration and disproportionate birth-rate induced demographic change with the way various ethnic groups consistently and predictably vote. This is just as true for harder-line minarchists as it is for more conventional conservatives. The future at this rate will have Hillary Clinton - style neoliberal progressivism representing the right while the left devolves into a blatant dysfunctional 3rd world communist horror-show. An eventuality where traditional conservative American values of limited government and personal autonomy are totally politically dead, and where the American flag is spat upon with as much disdain as the Confederate flag for it's racist history, is a huge wake up call. Thankfully the Trump phenomenon has made the Republican's strategy of cucking themselves into continued relevancy less doable without creating a blowback shitstorm from their own base, but the trends persist.

Race realism and an understanding of how aspects of HBD can affect the larger civilization in a way that is not conducive to creating a free and prosperous society. While ethnic groups hardly have inevitable political opinions and biological contributions to larger social issues are extraordinarily difficult to tease out, suffice it to say that having a large amount of people with lower IQ's and higher impulsiveness is less than ideal for the smooth functioning of a modern, technologically advanced society. In a way, libertarian concerns about "negative" freedom and personal autonomy are luxurious indulgences of relative material comfort and basic security. If anything, a more free society is going to require a lot more conscientious, morally altruistic or at least reciprocal behavior than the one we have now. People worried about not getting shot or feeding or housing themselves don't give a fuck about tax-cuts and are going to support whatever regime can promise to offer them these basic necessities while they input the minimal amount into the system. If you want to weasel your way out of this, you can fully blame minority dysfunction on culture, but I'm not sure that this is sustainable long-term because it gives you little moral/rational leeway to determine immigration policy at least partially on racial background, which is probably a better strategy to realistically preserve the kind of free society a libertarian might want to live in. Although, there are ways to "implicitly" screen immigrants that would disproportionately favor white immigration, which might reach the same result without being needlessly controversial or insulting to minority groups.

What the Alt-Right needs from Libertarians:

A moral justification for voluntary segregation of people based on racial grouping. Autonomy, self-determination, and freedom of association are all mainstream libertarian values. If they were protected, instead of being openly attacked, in law, it seems like that would be an easy way to create de facto whiteopias without demanding absolute racial purity or actively removing people. Clearly, the 1965 Civil Rights act violates property rights as understood by most libertarians. In fact, I remember the moderate Rand Paul getting some heat for this on an interview in which he evasively Bill Clintoned his way out of. Obviously, repealing the act is the consistent libertarian position.
Support for secession, or at least heightened federalism/local control. Let's face it - whites are not going to rise up and subjugate the darker peoples of America in an apartheid system, or start throwing Jews into ovens, or shipping everyone browner than a paper bag back to Liberia. It's just not happening. You're not even going to get whites to firmly in-group themselves independent of all other criteria in a more severe way than current minority groups already consider themselves vis a vis mainstream identity politics. It would have to get MUCH worse for that to happen, and by that point, it might already be too late (think Suidlanders in South Africa). So, if you're talking about anything approaching an ethnostate, you're talking about secession. In the United States, the implicitly white Red vs implicitly brown Blue divide is a great place to start. You can even encourage the left to do the seceding for you (Calexit). If aware Identarianism can latch on to Libertarian or conservative secession movements, I can see a viable, even if unlikely, route that could hijack pre-existing American ideals and mythology. What

I see many on the Alt-Righters or white nationalists proposing is a sort of raw, Nietzschean will-to-power based on vulgar racialism and requiring a sociopathic view towards non-whites, independent of political affiliation (a libtarded trans-dimensional communist pedophile that is white is in the in-group, while a conservative, productive, traditional Hispanic is out). I think you are setting a very low-ceiling for appeal and success by taking this approach. Let me put it this way, minorities, Jews, etc., did not usurp European societies via in your face, over the top racial chauvinism. They successfully infiltrated a stronger opponent by using universalist arguments in line with (at least some) of the host populations stated values, for self-centered tribal ends. If white's want to win this, they can't be afraid to do the same. If you're willing to condone genocide for Christ's sake, you shouldn't be afraid to argue like a Jew. Being edgelords and pranksters leaving Nazi graffiti on the bathroom stall wall of the internet has gotten you this far, but at some point, that shit is limiting if you want to win. Whites would be nearly ready to come to your side in an absolute landslide if they didn't have the trepidation of being associated with genocidal murderous Nazi race cleansers, and I'm not talking about false smears from the Left, which increasingly no one is taking seriously. I'm talking about from your own mouths.

Degenerates, Communists, and The Left make Fascists.
That's what I absolutely adore: the utter idiocy and inability to avoid the same mistakes over and fucking over again. People have gotten so obsessed with painting Hitler as the Ultimate Evil and obscuring any actual in-depth analysis of his Rise To Power that even the same people who whine about being "doomed to repeat history" are ironically dooming history to repetition.

Firstly the Communists: they go out of their way to hurt as many people as humanly possible and get giddy at human misery, period. We have quotes of Lenin celebrating the fact that his "fellow" Russians were dying of famine because it would weaken the Tsar's grip and get people to abandon their faith in their King and Country. We have Peter Hitchens admitting when he was a Trotskyite that his and his companions constant haranguing for more immigrants wasn't out of any kind of "solidarity", but rather the desire to see his country and the traditional institutions within it destroyed.
You even have people on this very subreddit admitting that they support mass-immigration ultimately to undermine the electoral process by getting a horde of voters in to blindly pass whatever the fuck they want.

Then you have the violence. Communists in Spain murdered innocent Catholics, they killed civilians and butchered businessmen. In Germany they launched a bloody "revolution" at the worst possible moment, thereby ensuring that Germany was that much more weaker at the bargaining table.

Germany is honestly the most ironic example, given we've got this idiotic narrative pushed by anti-fascists that Hitler was essentially "unopposed" in his rise, as if he could say whatever the fuck he wanted and no one would raise their voice: in truth their predecessors, the various red militias in Germany, were wreaking enough habit and threatening him enough that the SA could form fairly easily, and the narrative of the omnipresent "red menace", the violent thugs seeking to destroy Germany, was only reinforced.
And so today you have the far-right rising again; though unlike what the whining left says so far, they aren't fascist--at least not yet.

Fascism is ultimately born when the humiliation, the degeneration, the utter soulless materialism and corruption grows too much for society and it needs an intensive chemo treatment in the form of a dictator.

As for the rise of the alt-right, which is Fascism-lite in my opinion, all you have to do is simply look at the news and come to understand that a not-insignificant group of White Men realized that they had to argue for their peoples continued existence.

The media successfully painted a narrative that White men are evil, and whilst that might be fine for non-whites, many Whites realized that their government has been acting in the best interest of this amorphous blob called "The Nation" rather than simply for "The White Race", and in fact has been catering to Non-Whites for decades in spite of those various minority group's continued failure to reach economic parity with Whites.
Not only that, but The Left is quite honestly the most institutionally privileged "group" (for lack of a better term) in The West: their radicals can attempt to murder people with no legal ramifications, they can destroy property, they can ruin peoples lives and laugh at it whilst being lauded as heroes while their moderates can spew their disgusting ideology on the news, in the classroom, and at work without having to fear the slightest ramification.
Let me ask everyone here why the fuck would anyone want to be some meek little "Conservative" or "Republican" in this environment? If you're moderate you'll be met with violence, expelled, called Racist, Fascist, be humiliated, and if you raise your voice the same institutions which privilege The Left will try to annihilate you.
It reminds me of an old story in the death throes of the Qing Empire: essentially two generals would be late to a meeting due to flooding. One general turned to the other and asked "What's the penalty for being late?" "Death." Replied his peer. The first general pondered for a moment and asked, "What's the penalty for rebellion?" "Death." His peer replied again, and so they weighed their option and decided rebellion was the better choice.

The Left expects The Right to be smeared as hate mongers, as pure evil, to be willingly attacked, to have no sense of job, social, or educational security, and to do all that while being bashed for not grovelling enough... and then its shocked when The Right turns to fascism.
Can anyone provide any decent fucking argument for why Whites shouldn't turn to racial identarianism and race-based hatred? Can anyone provide any single reason why anyone on The Right should give a fuck about Fascism?
"Democracy"? The Left undermined it for centuries, it decided it wasn't going to work for votes, just drag in a bunch of minorities and give them free shit. You have people on this sub openly admitting that.
"Equality"? That quite honestly just means chasing the last white person down and murdering them.

"Treat others the way you wish to be treated"? Why is that always used as a one-way street? Blacks have been howling for blood constantly. Muslims murder people out in the streets. The Left has been treating The Right, even the moderate right, as Satan, and then they sputter and claim that The Right should treat others the way they want to be treated because...? Are we meant to imply that they have been treating us as not the way they wished to be treated themselves?
"Because its Fascism"? Fascism, Racism, Sexism, these words have been abused so-fucking much that Racism means anything from telling a Black chick her hair is curly to lynching blacks in the 60s, what's the worst that can happen if someone actually becomes a Fascist? They're a "double-fascist"?

The Far-Right is on the rise, and The Left has thankfully wrapped a noose around their own neck.