www.reddit.com

Readytodie85 #fundie reddit.com

All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell

Some incels #sexist #psycho reddit.com

Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.

image

(C0nserve)

I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come

Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already

(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.

Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.

(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.

(Deoxysxx)

I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father

I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.

Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.

(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.

And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.

His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.

(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks

PotatoAccount54123 #sexist reddit.com

Headline: Why are so many feminists obsessed with their genitals?

A lot of feminist stuff is associated with female genitalia. There are vagina monologues, vagina hats, vagina boats, paintings using period blood, yoghurt made out of vaginal yeast, etc.
You don't see MRAs do anything similar. Even the most extremist people in the manosphere don't do anything involving penises. The closest I've ever seen was the Wiener's Out thing in South Park, which was a parody.
I wonder why. The expected answer is that women's sexuality is oppressed and stuff, but I really don't see any social situation where penises are more appropriate than vaginas. In fact, it's the opposite: Female nudity is more socially acceptable than male nudity, whether it's in art or in real life. Women who flash their boobs or vaginas are met with cheers, while men who show their penises to people are arrested.
Granted, men do draw dicks on walls, but they don't really do it out of celebration of their masculinity, and it's considered more of a childish thing. Drawing dicks is mostly associated with juvenile humour, while the feminist vagina thing is supposedly classy and deep.
What are your thoughts?

mgtowforeverever #sexist reddit.com

I hate all women. I'm tired of hiding it.

Sorry, I said it. 27 years old, about to be 28, been pretty successful in my career up until this point (I work in film), I'm a really nice person that unfortunately wears my heart on my sleeve. Just wanted to find a decent girl to join me in the journey of life, but i've slowly realized over several horrible years that I've been completely brainwashed my whole life into wanting something that DOESNT. FUCKING. EXIST. It's all a cruel societal lie, what I've been fed about the true nature of women. Nobody cares about men. Nobody cares who you are. The millennial woman is truly a cancerous and toxic creature--solipsistic, calculating, and sociopathic in the deepest and most damaging of ways. They take and take and take and offer absolutely nothing in return. Going through the most depressing period of my life right now. Apologies for the rant, I'm just really hurting. Thank you all for this sub, the humor and the truth of it all--it keeps me sane on days I want to end it.

cashmerebb #sexist reddit.com

Well, most libfems i've talked with are all about men, and they were defending them every chance they got. They were always bring their boyfriends, dads, brothers or husbands in every conversation about the reality of male violence. My bf is sooo nice, my dad is awesome, you know, so male violence isn't a thing!! Stop being such a paranoid man hater! Misandry is AS bad as misogyny! Women are AS violent as men are, it's not a male issue! Woman are rapists too! Yup. "Feminists" told me that. Not MRAs, "feminists".

So, dear libfems, why are you even calling yourselves feminists, if you don't think that women are oppressed and often abused by men?... I do HAVE a bf, but i know that doesn't mean that male violence isn't a thing! Sure, he respect me, he loves me, blablabla who cares, but i've been abused and raped by men before. I know that men are the fucking problem, it's a fact not an opinion, that most women are better off alone than married with men, and female violence is actually really rare. Even male victims of rape, violence, are raped and abused by other men, not women, not feminists, even the "misandrist TERF" ones! We have every right to hate men, and to stay away from them. We are not dangerous, we are often traumatized women, and we deserve peace. TERF is just the new "feminazi" or "evil man hater hairy lesbian feminist"... So progressive.

vladimirlenincel #sexist reddit.com

Has anyone noticed the lack of empathy women possess?

They don’t care about anyone other than themselves. This is why feminism is such a popular movement overall, it’s a chance for women to gain privileges and gain superiority over men. They make false claims like the wage gap then cry for imaginary justice against the so-called “patriarchy”, what a load of shit.

They especially hate incels, I remember I watched this one YouTube video of an attention whoring female going through an incel forum. She didn’t care at all about the posts involving suicide or depression, she just kept on crying about how the incels wanted to hurt and rape females even when most incels are peaceful.

BigEarthBear #sexist reddit.com

Ever since a recent discussion, I have had a frustration with POMO activism and how incorrect it is in regards to feminism. Another person and I were talking to the group about the need for sex-based hate crime legislation. What we find is it is nearly impossible to get valid and correct hate crime data on the percentage of hate crimes against gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people. Here is how sex-based hate crime legislation is necessary as a category for LGBT.

Violence against lesbians is generally NOT classified as a hate crime because lesbians are classified as "female or "woman" in police reports therefore not subject to hate crime laws. So reports of corrective rape or gay bashing are instead put in the "women dead files". Sex-based hate crime laws would also put an end to "the women's dead files" because they can not ignore hate crimes in the same manner they do other crimes. This is why trans activists demand that trans women are reported as being TRANSWOMEN, not men or women.

It sparked the usual pomo crap. sex-based laws are noninclusive of trans people "TERFs" even though, like same-sex marriage, transgender people are already protected by the law, it is women who excluded from these protections based on their sex.

The conversation changed into the same old argument. My fellow activist is a "TERF." , "Trans women are women", "She's not a real feminist because her feminism does not include trans women." blah blah blah. Please note: There was no mention of trans men being men or trans men at all. Intersexed people were brought up out of context. The co-presenter was not attacked at all, I'm male, what a shock except to point out incorrectly that I am an alleged male feminist... people keep calling me a male feminist when there is no such thing as a male feminist.

I corrected them on two points during this discussion. 1) Feminism since it's beginning only focussed on female oppression. 2) Males cannot be feminists because it is a female movement. Feminism can affect how a male thinks or moves through the world but we can not claim feminism.

They immediately went to an explosion of talking a feminist theory or feminist writings out of context. Dworkin is the only 2nd waver I can recall that included transexuals. They even quoted the heretic Germaine Greer out of context. What I realized quickly is the misuse of the words woman and gender in regards to POMO TRA/ SJW/ Liberal Feminism vs feminism. At the time of those writings starting with the founding of feminism, being a woman was defined as adult human FEMALE the reproductive sex that produces large gametes and bares children. Gender was discussed as; men (males) patriarchal (male) oppression of women (females). So contextually it has always been solely about fighting female oppression. Trans women are males and trans men are females. Nothing that they quoted proved that feminism is about the inclusion of trans women and therefore the exclusion of trans men. It has always been focussed on reproductive biology if you take a serious thoughtful look at it.

Side note: Apparently I am a frustrating transphobic fag, according to that part of the group. They always call me a faggot.

Lookismisreal #sexist reddit.com

Trannies are nasty creatures

It always pisses me the fuck off when I see some norman-scum suggest that Incels should think and give a chance towards dating transexual femoids. Seriously. Why the fuck would anyone of us do that? Honestly, I do wonder what goes through the Norman brain when they suggest such degenerate crap like that. Trannies are nothing more than a bunch of mentally ill retards who are pretending to be femoids while actually being men. Which means; they have cawks. Why in damnation would we, heterosexual men, want to get into relationship with another fucking man? We aren't gay in any fucking way. And, this notion still stands towards the trannies who have cut off their cawks. Only a deeply twisted, mentally ill creature would cut their fucking cawks off. Truly revolting.

You know, only in degenerate societies would this regressing behaviour be accepted. It truly shows how humanity have fallen and stopped progressing further when we welcome these creatures with open arms. These creatures should be admitted into mental wards because they are clearly suffering from gender dysphoria.

Brief note: If you're intending to argue how pretending to be femoids while being men and cutting your cawks off is normal behavior; just fuck off. You degenerates are everything what is wrong with this society.

Lookismisreal #sexist reddit.com

Religion is needed to control females

I'm not really religious, however, I do understand how religion plays a vital and important role in our society. How does it play a important role in our society, you may ask? Well, humans as a group need something to believe in that connects them to each other -- and religion gives them exactly that. It gives people a common purpose and good values to follow. We, as humans, aren't advanced enough to function well enough without any kind guidance yet. We are still far from achieving it. In my opinion, only high intelligent beings retain any kind of morality without religion.

Just look at what has become of our society when people reject religion: nothing but filled with endless degeneracy. Femoid sexual liberation, slutdom, polygamy/polyamory, cuckoldry, abortion, transexualism and feminism is thriving due to the fact that religion is slowly fading away and people are embracing immoral values into their life's. Society as we know it would not last for long if corruption has reached every level of its infrastructure.

Think about it: would femoids act so recklessly if religion was still in play? No, of course not. Religion controlled femoids animalistic instincts and put them on leashes; as they should be. Nowadays we are seeing nothing but a massive imbalancement of promiscuity, fertility and birth rates among femoids due to the so-called "progressive" sexual freedoms and feminism running rampant. It truly is sickening and revolting.

Our society has reached the pinnacle of it's decadence, and it's time to restore the balance by either embracing the Old Testament or Islam. They always knew what kind of hedonistic and degenerate creatures femoids were, and how people in general needed to behave with good ethics and morals. It's time to bring those teachings back before it's too late.

incelery33333 #sexist reddit.com

If women are caring, nurturing humans, that are not ALL exactly the same, then why am I still a virgin?

All 3.5 billion women are the exact same. They literally function the same way as putting in formulas on a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Which is why incels exist.

Lookismisreal #fundie reddit.com

Incels shouldn't contribute towards society

We live in a society that offers everyone various benefits, except for of course Incel men. Even though we are offered nothing, we are still somehow expected to contribute towards society by needlessly wageslaving and giving a specific amount of the income we receive back to the government as tax. My question is, why? Why do we need to continue paying tax to a corrupt society that not only ignores our pleas but also shuns us in every way possible?

Just ask yourselves: is society actually worth contributing towards? I say, no. Incels as a minority are harassed and discriminated against everyday, not just in real life, but on online as well. And what actions does society take to prevent such things from occurring? Nothing. We are not allowed to congregate as a community, we are not allowed to voice our opinions and we are not allowed to ask for any kind of benefits as it is deemed as being "entitled". However, this corrupt society seems to be more than happy to provide anyone who isn't an Incel with benefits using the tax money we provide. Single mothers, being a good example.

The fact of the matter is society has failed Incel men. And if the system is not going to offer us anything for our contributions, then there is simply no point for us to continue contributing towards the system in anyway. Instead of wageslaving, Incels should all drop out, fake some disabilities, and exploit the system in a way where we can bleed off this unjust society that resent us so much. This way, it will be the normans who will be paying for our living expenses, rather than us paying for them.

PsychyAnalyst #sexist reddit.com

Edify yourself: Use the power within to metastasize greatness.

The question is not "why you are an incel", "but why are you are not playing their game". Femoids have something you want, so you have to give them something they want. If you don't have it by virtue of genetic disposition, you have to make it. If you lack the tools to make it, you have to buy their services from them. They are prostitutes because men want to purchase their goods. They are prostitutes and men purchase their goods because that is the most successful reproduction strategy.

You are not cel because you want to be, just as much as she is not woman because she wants to be. The difference is she was born with something somebody wants and will work hard to get. You are born with nothing she wants, so you will have to work much harder than if you had something she wanted.

Yes, there are 3.5 billion of them, all with something the other ~3.5 billion want. You don't possess that quality, but you should be thankful, because now you aren't looking to exchange it for something else. You are blessed because you have nothing to give, therefore you have only yourself to cherish. It is counter intuitive, because the world and your biology wants you exchange you time/energy/labor/property for their service. Realizing you don't have to give any of your things is the the enlightenment of your own free will, a gift femoids do not get because they are tempted to enter into this exchange of flesh. They loose a piece of themselves because they are expected to, but there is no burden upon you, no temptation, no loss of energy and soul to obtain temporary gratification. You are more powerful then them because you retain your essence for yourself. Use that energy for power and for issue of self gratification. Become a man without purpose to the inferior and you will always be superior.

PsychyAnalyst #sexist reddit.com

The evolution of Man and Woman. Why man is self evident and woman is unaware.

The evolutionary instincts of women are completely different from that of men. Men are utility for women because women have a naturally occurring period, gestation, and rearing. There are many factors to the way women evolve and why her behaviors are more instinctively driven from that of her male counterparts, but I'm only going to go over a few and particularly as it pertains to those reproduction traits I've listed above.

A womens' biological clock starts ticking around the age of puberty. That age has been proven to be linked directly to the capacity of the tribe/society to bring children to term and adulthood. If society is not producing healthy adults, then the age of puberty in girls gets younger and younger. This mechanism ensures that women have an innate ability to alter the course of human reproduction if required. Once the clock is ticking, she will experience trauma every month to ensure that she is aware of the opportunities for children. After a while of not having children, hormones kick in that give her thoughts of having children, even if she did not consciously want them. Once she is pregnant, she goes through a slew of other hormones that ensure she is getting enough resources or has the potential for acquiring resources to raise the child. She also undergoes significant changes to her mood and other feelings in order to bond with the child. This produces an unconditional love for the child in order for her to take the life seriously and raise it to successful reproduction as well. For all of these reasons, she only chooses to mate with males that will readily provide her the genetics that procreate healthy children, as well as men that are mentally equipped to dedicate themselves to her cause. Men that are seen as inferior to her do not get to reproduce willingly with her. Also, men do not have any of these problems as they get to reproduce regardless of any schedule or naturally occurring cycle. For this reason, men are disposable in biology and followed through in culture.

The reason why women act instinctively whereas men act practically is because reproduction would be deterred otherwise and you and I would not be here to tell this tale. She seeks men that are practical and devoted because otherwise she would not be able to care for herself and her children and again, you and I would not be here to tell this tale. The reason why she is not made self aware of her own desires/wants/needs is because having children and reproducing are the only requirement to further the race. If it were possible for her to outweigh her own desires over that of her children/future children then she would choose herself because that would be easier and more practical than going through that whole mess and again, you and I would not be here discussing the merits of evolution. Women are made clueless about their desires and choose only the best males that would dedicate themselves to her, work hard and accomplish great things, so those are the males that exist today.

The evolution of the female mind is that it can not understand or be made self aware of a thing-in-itself. The evolution of the male mind is that he must provide for females and give himself to her if need be. Women do not reproduce with men that leave them without resources to carry their children to the age of reproduction. They are in control of what genes make it to the next generation of the species, but if they understood this, they would be less likely to reproduce. They always choose resource gathering for themselves over any benefits expressed to the tribe as a whole, and for that reason allowing them to vote on political issues is dangerous at best and self destructive at worst.

Lookismisreal #sexist reddit.com

Why normies are the biggest cucks on the planet

There is literally no other way around it; normans are literally the biggest cucks on the planet. They will accept to be in the most degenerate relationship ever just to get a feel of being less desperate and miserable than they already are, even though the cum dumpsters they are with are only with them solely because the norman cucks provide for them. Here is a list why normans are huge cucks:

• Normans are okay with their partners not being virgins.

• Normans are okay with their partners having multiple amounts of sexual encounters with random men.

• Normans are okay with seeing their partner getting fucked by Chad/Tyrone as he pathetically jacks off to it like the cuck he is.

• Normans are okay with their partners not doing various sex acts with them because its "uncomfortable", even though the cuntrags have done despicable things with Chad/Tyrone.

• Normans are okay with getting into a polyamorous relationship because they are afraid their bitch of a partner will leave them if they don't.

• Normans are okay with their partner talking with other men.

• Normans are okay with their partner having male friends.

• Normans are okay with their partner still being friends with its ex.

• Normans are okay with getting into a relationship with a single mother and raising Chads/Tyrone's spawns as his own.

• Normans are okay with their partner having crushes on other men.

• Normans are okay with their partner talking about its crushes with its femoid friends.

• Normans are okay with their partner flirting with other men. As the cuck brushes it off as "harmless" behavior.

• Normans are okay with their partner masturbating to pictures/videos of Chad/Tyrone, which is basically virtual cuckoldry.

• Normans are okay with their partners being bisexual cunts who actively engages in sex with their own femoid kind.

• Normans are okay with their partner going out with its femoids friend on a "gurls night out".

• Normans are okay with their partners being on degenerate social media applications.

Holyheavens #sexist reddit.com

(Emphasis original)

We need a strict Patriarchy in order to put every single woman on a leash. They can not be allowed to have any sort of freedom outside of a man's influence because they can't handle it as we see in Western society.

Every modern western woman nowadays is no better than criminal scum.

When you don't coursely discipline and keep women under control, they go loose like wild beasts and spread their ass cheeks for every second Chad they encounter who then goes on to pump his load in their every hole. Governed by pure lust, as if they have no mind of their own they keep trying to satisfy these basic carnal desires through instant gratification.

There isn't a single shred of long term thinking in their primitive minds so when the time comes where they feel their biological clock is ticking, panic breaks out.

The sly filthy amoral foid then starts to look for a gullible weak man whom she can easily wrap around her finger. At that point, the disgusting used up cumrag who has devolved into a barbarian has lost all capacity for pair bonding. Don't even dream she's a type of person whom you can grow old with. No, she's long past that. Her primary incentive is to gain social points so she doesn't feel left out and also extracting resources from the stupid man.

While the poor husband is head over heels and mistakenly believes he's found a partner with whom he can build a relationship based on mutual understanding and Love, his wife is not sexually attracted to him in the slightest. Every 2 months when the man's been a good boy, he gets his dead starfish sex while she fantasises about her past sexploits with taller, more masculine and above all better looking men. They degraded her, treated her as nothing more than a meathole and she loved every second of it.

Children are conceived. A couple years later she files a divorce because "they grew apart" which really just means the foid has become bored of the bluepilled wimp, telling herself "I can do better than this". Loyalty is a totally foreign concept to woman. For a man with principles, being able to keep his word is akin to his lifeforce. Being scrupulous, consistent and reasonable is what makes a man feel actually human. Women lack all will towards this higher from of being and will strictly adopt whatever that won't ostracize them from society or their social environment. Another thing to note, women are not capable of experiencing cognitive dissonance because they only pay attention to how something feels for them in the present moment and that feeling justifies whether something is right or wrong. Whether it's immoral, deceptive or downright evil plays no part. Usually this is done through thorough applying self-deception and doublethink.

When she's gotten bored of the wimp, the woman turns into an incredibly demanding histrionic dramawhore. She's trying to rationalize everything into being the man's fault upon an impending divorce from her part.

The children then experience a breakdown of the family which brings with itself only detrimental consequences for their future in respect to their mental well-being, education and lifechoices. The profound effects of divorce is well documented in multiple academic studies with single-motherhood making things much much worse because single mothers are horrible and stupid parents.
__________________________________
Women are first of all innately morally deficient and alogical creatures who go loose like rabid bonobo's when not firmly curbed and put on their place by men.

They will degenerate everything that is intelligent and virtuous on their path of heedless destruction because they have no fucking idea what the fuck they're doing. They can not think matters through, they just can't. Woman's entire persona consists solely of the surface it reflects. You can not find anything beneath it, it's void. Her entire persona is an absorption from external influences she molds into what then consists as her core identity stemming from an extreme suggestibility. While women are mere empty individuals who can only act in accordance with the community, man is a higher form of life expressed as a differentiated individuality often referred to as the soul characterized by a strong will for greater truth and a deep connection with all that is. With the universe. It's for this reason that there has never been a single decent female philosopher nor will one ever emerge.

It also gives birth to originality and creativity which is characteristic to man. Woman can only reproduce it. Even among the poor and oppressed negro's of the USA, the blues, jazz, hip hop, rap all sprung out of young black men to draw an illustration. Let's not begin about science, classical music and ancient art. They speak for themselves. Women's achievements (always coming from the most masculine ones) bear no comparison.

Many men today are misled from what has been common knowledge since the dawn of humanity over all human societies ever surfaced. Emancipation of women isn't something enlightened or advanced from earlier patriarchal societies. It's pure stupidity and a product of capitalist policies in need for a larger wageslave force.

From a young age men are indoctrinated into a false idea of women. We are to believe women are capable of having agency, that they too are rational beings with whom we can have deep fulfilling conversations on worldly matters, that they are capable of unconditional love on the basis of who you are as a person instead of what you are, that they can breathe inspiration into your mind from insight on who you are, that women are all so different that there are certainly enough who fit these aforementioned criteria (not a single does). That a relationship where both parties stand on equal ground is possible. All these delusions are further exacerbated by media consumption with japanese animations in particular were the women are often a projection of the male producers their ideals.
__________________________________
A woman's natural inclination is submission and passivity.

She wants to be led, molded and derive her sense of identity of a man she considers to be in a dominant position. When a woman says she likes confidence, she means a man who's narcissism surpasses that of her for example. A woman can't respect a man who does not assert himself as the chief in a relationship. All of this comes easier when the male is taller because greater stature is directly imposing, hence their avid preference for this trait. This puts neatly in picture how primitive women actually are. These are her primal instincts she's incapable of sacrificing for the greater good of a society. If you let them go their own way, they will instinctively over the course of time aim primarily for apex men which will heavily skew the ratio of men and women with offspring. You see a similar instance with wild beasts such as gorilla's and even chimpanzees. In fact, this push can already be observed in "progressive" societies such as Norway where the gap between biological fathers and biological mothers has been steadily widening since female emancipation. Such a social order could never promote a civilised society as it would induce a perpetual competition between men barring them from cooperation.

A woman can not free herself from these impulses, only law and order pressed by men can guide an inherent amoral creature such as woman towards intelligent and virtuous behavior.

I thus propose extraordinary strict and harsh countermeasures for the revival of a full on Patriarchy. Beginning with a law that punishes any woman that engages in fornication through capital punishment. The capital punishment is preceded by stripping the prosecuted woman of her clothes on a public square where she is submitted to hundreds of flagellations. Once her body is covered in blood, salt is added for more pain. This form is public humiliation and inflicting of pain needs to act as a necessary deterrent for any woman who's daring to think of fornicating.

When this procedure has been completed, the woman is put out of her misery with public stoning. This helps with fostering a wider disgust and hatred towards criminals such as fornicators, so young children should be encouraged in participating to the stoning.

I'd like to emphasize once again that I'm advocating for lawful procedures enforced by the State.

We'd also need laws that would ban all women from education, holding public offices, choosing their own partners, participating in politics etc..

They should be banned from pretty much any institution where they can exercise their mindless opinions or choices that could bear an influence the societal structure. Be beautiful, take care of the family and shut up.

incelery33333 #sexist reddit.com

Daily life of an inceltears user (male).

Wake up in the same room as wife and wife's boyfriend.

Get up from the cardboard bed on the floor with a bunch of pillowcases and newspapers.

Approach the king sized bed where wife and boyfriend sleeps, and quietly wipes off the dried cum stains.

Kisses wife and catches glimpse of boyfriend who winks at the inceltears user.

Brushes his teeth and showers (hopefully, since they tell us to).

opens his fridge and has a hard time deciding which flavor of soylent to choose. Decides on flavor, but sees that wife and wife's boyfriend used them in foreplay, so he chooses his second favorite flavor.

drinks one sitting down in the kitchen while hearing sex noises from the bedroom.

takes two more bottles of soylent to work.

arrives to his boring, overlit, dry temperature office job where the front desk slut pretends to be nice.

gets to tiny cubicle where pictures of him, his wife and wife's boyfriend lie.

inceltears user goes on his office desktop and spends majority of the 8 hours browsing r/braincels , maleforeveralone , incels.me , and refreshes r/incels , incel.life and incelocalypse since they are going delusional and want to see more incel content.

Inceltears user goes on to post stupid platitudes and also whiteknights for certain users on inceltears who literally prove the incels right by talking about hooking up with chads.

Inceltears user brags about his poly relationship but hides the fact that the wife forced this and threatened him.

Inceltears user is about to lose an internet argument that HE started, and is backed to a corner filled with OKCupid studies, numerous blackpills, Tinder catfishes and of course, over two decades of experience from tons of users.

Inceltears user drinks the two bottles of soylent and "wins" the argument by saying "No wonder why you're incel."

After a hard day of stalking a bunch of male virgins and doing nothing productive at work (and complaining about incels being NEET), he goes home and hears more sex noises.

Makes spaghetti for his wife and wife's boyfriend.

Holds wife's hair while it eats the spaghetti.

Also holds wife's hair while it gives head to the boyfriend.

Inceltears user goes into bathroom and jacks itself off to arby's esque women who post on gonewild. Leaves an obligatory whiteknight comment.

Wife forces boyfriend to stay out of bedroom for a good two hours prior to sleeping so they could have sex.

Inceltears user goes on r/braincels to insult male virgins while being turned on to his wife and boyfriend getting it on. Posts on inceltears when backed into a corner and having no response to actual studies and proof that incels post, like always.

Wife and boyfriend fall asleep on king sized bed.

Inceltears user lays on his cardboard bed on the floor and before shutting his eyes and waiting for the next pathetic day of insulting male virgins, he says to himself "I might be a literal cuck and a loser, but at least i'm not a blackpilled incel."

nofilmynofucky #sexist reddit.com

Yup. As much as they like to talk about 'the sisterhood' and supporting their sisters, women will never understand true friendship.

It's why they love the word 'bromance' so much, it frames their lack of capacity for true support and team work as something strange and masculine. Ever notice there's not a female specific version of the term?

Mad_Dog-Philosopher #sexist reddit.com

A brotherhood of men is one of the most feared concepts of all. A common cause shared between those who dont share blood, but happen to share the same gender and the same cause. Women won't ever fully understand it, nor can they ever become part of that brotherhood.

In their quest to create conflict between men and intrude into male spaces, they're trying to find the strongest one as their biological imperative orders them to. The brotherhood of men has the power to refuse. The brotherhood has the ability to think rationally and work out the best way for everyone to thrive.

MGTOW represents the brotherhoods of old reborn. The Greek philosophers and the Spartan's would recognize what we're doing here. They would approve. Understand that we're fighting a war of ideologies, a war far more serious than Communism vs. Capitalism. Uphold the brotherhood and understand your fellow man, hold your ground and help the brothers who would help you. Forget the narcissists, the PUA's, the wannabe-Chad's and the wouldbe-Alpha's, they're weak. As a brotherhood, we can conquer the world without breaking a sweat. The shame, the unjust laws, the irrational narratives and the guilt-trips are the weapons of the weak built to break us. They will fail.

Live strong brothers, go your own way and spread the message. This one loves you all as brothers.

alysdexia #fundie reddit.com

(This person is defending paedophiles abusing children)

1: That's what in hell, not the nonsensical what the hell. Your assertion is that it doesn't matter how the world behaves, so that you will not compare other standards to your own, only how you are affected.

2: What determines mental capacity other than age? I'll bet you refuse any objective qualifier (such as learning or IQ). When I was 11 and 12 I went to college with 18-yeareds, and qualified for every entry-level class. You can only project your shortcomings onto everyone.

3: You can't treat this as intellectual property or privacy case as you believe youth are property without a mind, will, say, or sake. Therefore you will interject yours onto them, talk of and down to them without theirs, and misrepresent and libel them.

4: That's what I mean; you aren't them nor like them. You don't pretend to know or care about them, only of your own feelings. If you knew more about the prison camps and the subjects so that you could induce outlook on all prison camps and subjects, then your word on it can matter.

5/6/7: I spend most of my time in dictionaries (and grew up with dictionaries) to see how the world has becomen more rotten; English has been dead for 1000 years after the Norman Conquest and is not productive in other than compound words and slang; professionals in Commonwealth steal words from other languages, mistranslated, and misapply them amids English talk. E.g. dog does not mean doghouse yet psycho is expected to mean psychopath and pedo pedophile. These lackwits cannot respect word boundaries nor the roots' meanings. Pædo- doesn't mean child-; it means kid-. Literally it refers to someone who is fed and shares a root with father and food.

A child is someone born, to a parent, a son or dauhter. A grownup is a child. A teen is a child but not a kid. Child in Hellènic is tecno. A filo is a friend and filia means friendship; it has nothing to do with sex. Contrast with erastia which means lovership, eros for love, erastès for lover, and eromenos for beloved. The substantive in a compound goes first. Therefore a pædofilo is a kidfriend, a kid who is a friend (after boyfriend, girlfriend, etc.); someone who loves kids is a erastopædia. Like in English, Hellènic doesn't distinguish between love of mind and body and context is important to determine a word's meaning. If you consider the literal meanings of words your world uses, you'd know how twisted, absurd, and perverted it is, and may think of better, narrower terms that befit the subject more.

Snapcat239 #fundie reddit.com

Could Junko Furuta be the reincarnation of General Shiro Ishii (Unit 731 director)?

Despite knowing about the horrible death and torture (44 days) that Junko Furuta endured as a captive before her death, and knowing that life is circular and reincarnation is governed by the laws of karma, could it be possible that Junko's past life was actually the evil General Shiro Ishii, who directed the live human experimentation on Chinese POWs during WWII in Manchuria? After Japan lost WWII, General Shiro Ishii did not actually get prosecuted, and despite his directing of the most atrocious acts of evil in human history, walked away scotch free and lived to the ripe old age of 67, coverting to Catholicism right before his death.

General Shiro Ishii died in 1959 and Junko was born in 1971, a 12 year span. Both are Japanese.

Not to take anything from the horrors of Junko's captivity and death, but if one is to believe in karma, then nothing happens by accident. Junko was unfortunate enough to the girl captured precisely because her past life karma dictated such a result. The fact that she experienced 44 days of torture means that she must have had some EXTREMELY dark karma in her past life to set up for this. The torture that she went through happens to quite match the nature of the tortures dished out to POWs by General Shiro Ishii, and the fact they their lives were 12 years apart, and both Japanese, made me make the connection.

Don't know what others might think about this theory.

behind7proxies123 #fundie reddit.com


However, that would be applying in a traditional sense of what "rape" actually is. I would like to add that if it was legal to have an affair with a minor, and if she consented (even if legally they aren't 'capable' of consenting, so it would be statutory rape) then I was be all for proceeding.

I mean, personally I believe that if you're old enough to be responsible for a crime you commit, then you are able to consent, which I'd say (if legal) I'd do it with a 12 year old. Personally, when I was 12 I was extremely mature for my age, and due to puberty causing me to be extremely horny, I'd want to be able to have sex with anyone I wanted to (as long as they started puberty or older). Still, I know my opinion varies widely from those of others.

In case that hasn't convinced you to think that I'm a scum of the earth, if I were in Thailand and if I were offered to have sex with a child prostitute between 4 - 12, I would gladly do the business transaction. In fact, I've had a fantasy about it as well... about how I acquire said child from the clutches of the pimp renting her out, making sure she is well fed and taken care of, yet I would still obviously have sex with her as I saw fit. More like, rescuing from something considered 'evil' and putting her in a 'less evil' environment. So, I suppose you could call me a potential child molester for taking party of such transactions. Morally, yes I realize that it is considered 'wrong' to do so, but the 'wrongness' of it all is what makes me want to do it so badly. The stigma of pedophilia and child molestation, the potential jail time, it petrifies and yet exhilarates me at the very same time, strangely enough. You may be asking, "If he's willing to molest a 4 - 12 year old child, he'd do the same here! He needs to be castrated! He needs to be shanked in prison! He needs help" While I would gladly anonymously do the last part, I see child prostitution different from just going about in a van and kidnapping children because I see the former as his/her consent and a money transaction, and the latter as plain rape. I know the fact that they're that young does change things, and if I weren't a pedophile myself, I'd probably be apart of the hunt to kill me as well, especially if I was a parent, but to me I see it as regular prostitution.

Paying for sex with an adult woman at a brothel wouldn't be considered rape, and if so, I sure as hell don't see it as such. Yes, I realize these children are in majority of cases being forced to do these things, but I have the mindset of "If I don't do it, someone else will so I may as well". If I ever did have sex with a child prostitute, I would never harm her any more than penetration, and that'd be it.

A_FERTILE_YOUNG_BUCK #fundie reddit.com

[Comment under "Pathetic Attempt! Do you not know we are GODS!?!?!?! YOU HAVE NO POWER HERE!!!"]

Note: RWDS means "Right-Wing Death Squad"

Shit like this makes me want to go full RWDS on these fucking pieces of human filth. The left claims to be the side of reasonable viewpoints and peace, but they sure are pretty god damn violent and irrational with all the fear mongering and vitriol.

Nothing has radicalized me more in my lifetime than seeing the left in its full, fascist glory.

They need to be dealt with.

WaltzRoommate #fundie reddit.com

Earlier today, I went to go study for an actuarial exam at a table by the pool at my apartment complex. My apartment set up some pretty nice scenery with a waterfall and palm trees and stuff, so it's a nice place to study. I didn't stick around for a very long time, because there were about ten to twenty black people there having a bit of a get together and it kinda ruined it for me.

I'm not saying that they were doing anything wrong. They live in the apartment complex and have the right to be there. They are allowed to play their black people music at the volume they had it, they weren't being destructive or violent, or anything like that. It was just a large group of black people gathering in a way that they're allowed to do and using the facilities like anyone else.

When normies talk about assimilation, they usually talk about it in trivial ways. Does this person speak fluent English without an accent? Does this person celebrate Thanksgiving? Does this person watch American TV shows and movies while getting the cultural references? Etc. I get that that's a quantitative way to do things, but it doesn't really get to the heart of the matter.

Black people music has a very distinctive "black" sound and even a black feeling to it. Blacks have different mannerisms with each other, from things as obvious as the volume that they speak at or harder to describe like the way the influxes of how they talk or even the words they use (even when they don't talk in ebonics.) It just creates a very different feeling to it and I don't really like it.

I'm also going to note that there were no other whites in the pool area today. It's usually mostly white, but there wasn't a single one there today. I think it should be pretty obvious that they had exactly the same feeling that I did. They just didn't like the scenery.

I wouldn't describe my feeling as "hatred." I associate "hatred" with a passionate emotion of intense anger and disgust at someone's mere existence, not just with disliking the scenery that other groups make. I don't think wicked things about them and I do acknowledge that they were just doing their thing exactly as they were allowed to do. It's just very unattractive to me, and apparently to every white (actually, every non-black) in the apartment.

I think that the reason why the left tries to demonize the way I feel so much is because it's a really powerful argument. I don't really like the idea that wherever I live, I'll have to leave whenever certain groups decide to hang out. And sure, some liberal here will comment "You didn't have to leave" but I kind of did, or at least I couldn't have had the type of experience I was hoping to have.

And btw, I live near a city so there are plenty of liberals and communists where I live; none of them wanted to be near these blacks. It's just not a good thing to put up with and that should be enough reason in and of itself not to support diversity.

It also doesn't rely on them being criminals or rapists or anything. My apartment is expensive enough that those people are pretty much weeded out. It's just that white people generally don't like how these groups are and so it makes sense for us to want a place of our own.

t4mvv1lx #fundie reddit.com

Ive watched a lot of Jared Taylors speeches and I'll say he has a point.What Taylor is saying is basically how everyone else outside the western world thinks.Everyone has their home and everyone has the right to preserve including white people.If diversity is a strength then does this mean Japan,China and SK are weak?

I also believe in racial differences.if we were all exactly the same the world will be a bland boring place.We are all different species of the same animal.However IQ is not destiny.IQ does not determine how far you go in life.

I can assure you if you went outside the west,you will be racially discriminated openly with no apologies.This diversity experiment,like everything else needs moderation.Whenever I travel overseas I prefer to see people who are different from me,that's the whole point of tourism.

Displacement is not a joke and it has serious ramifications.If you think Hispanics won't make efforts to keep their eventual majority then you're joking.They will reconstruct your country
I wouldn't say I support or love the altright but I understand where youre coming from.Im open minded,most people aren't.

The anti-Semitism is delegitimising your movement though.

CAN'T TRUST HILLARY #fundie reddit.com

Reddit is now purging accounts related to "Russian" activity. Don't fall for this. Reddit is involved in mass propaganda activity as well, and it's in their interest to get rid of any competitors. There are multiple domestic outfits involved in social media manipulation and propaganda campaigns. There are even ones dedicated to spreading propaganda about Russian propaganda. As of now, there is no way for you to know what is real, what is fake, what is real but being spread by fake accounts, and what is fake being spread by real accounts. Reddit has their own interests. They are not the same as yours.

BonePressed #sexist reddit.com

It is IMPOSSIBLE to be happy without a girlfriend

The whole point of our existence is sexual reproduction. Thus, every part of our body is telling us to "have sex, have sex, have sex". When you are denied this fundamental human need, you can't help but to feel MISERABLE. Every school shooter could have been stopped if a femoid actually showed them love. It's femoids' fault!

WaltzRoommate #fundie reddit.com

What do Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, and all other countries that we've bombed all have in common?

The answer is that they'll all be fine in twenty years. Let me clarify what I mean by this. I don't mean that they'll be economically recovered. I don't mean that they won't have lost hundreds of thousands of people. I don't mean any of that. I mean that they'll have secured the existence of their people and a future for their children. The little things like individual lives and luxuries will be gone, but they aren't in danger of losing the things that really matter.

They'll be fine as we either run out of money to fund our military activity or once the boomers die and nobody votes for war anymore. They can all think to themselves: "We'll be okay once the Americans leave, maybe not me personally, but We will be." And they can know for certain that the US will leave. Will it be in five years? Ten? Twenty? I don't know, but we'll be gone soon enough. In the eyes of history, a few decades isn't an especially long time.

If we really wanted to win this war, we wouldn't be relying so much on our military. You know what we'd do? We'd be taking millions of ordinary American families and giving them incentives to go live in and develop these middle eastern nations. We'd build schools, wholesome communities, a police force, have kids, and so on. When would we leave? Never. That's how you win a war. Have you ever heard the meme "If not for X, we'd all be speaking German right now?" This is the type of thought behind that meme. Sometimes you can change demographics with things like genocide or forcing them off their land, but you need to change the demographics.

This is also why Mexico's mass immigration is an act of war. We don't have the luxury that the Syrians have of knowing that what really matters will be safe in America. We are not faced merely with loss of luxury, economy, infrastructure, slight underpopulation or whatever. We cannot think to ourselves that things will probably be okay after a few decades. Our worries are the big things, like the existence of our people and a future for our children, and that's because what we're facing is the fundamental essence of war: demographic change. Military activity is part of most wars, but it's not what war is about. War is about demographic change.

HiddenShorts #sexist reddit.com

Pregnancy and the lack of authority the man has over his child's life is one of the arguments that really gets me riled up. As a father I couldn't imagine being told "I'm pregnant. I don't want it. And I'm not discussing this, period" is a fear of good men who want children.

various TERFs #sexist reddit.com

YouTube shooting suspect dead; identified as female

(FeminamRadicalis)
The question is: what do they mean by female? Do they mean a biological woman born woman with XX chromosomes? Or do they mean a male who feeeeeeeeeeeeeels like a lady and therefore is somehow a "female"?

It will be a bit of time before we know. Since this is a tech company, the latter seems like a safer bet due to the glut of TIMs in tech. I will be very surprised if the assailant turns out to be an actual female, but stranger things have certainly happened. If the attacker is a TIM, I sense a push towards peak trans coming for the US.

(st_quiteria)
I'd rather not speculate. Amy Bishop is a woman, after all. Women occasionally have violent impulses and act on them for a whole host of reasons. Maybe you should consider deleting this comment before it gives the trolls ammunition.

(FeminamRadicalis)
I honestly could care less what the trolls / stalkers make of any comment I've made, this one included.

I did allow for the possibility that the shooter might be an actual woman by saying "stranger things have happened".

However, it is true that TIMs retain male patterns of crime rates and further that TIMs are per capita much better represented in tech than actual women are.

It's also interesting to simply consider that we are now at a point where we are forced to speculate if the use of the term "female" implies an actual biological woman or a male who says he feels like a woman. We can't know off the bat if this is a real woman or not, due to the rapid way in which that word has shifted in meaning over the past few years. That's quite chilling, really.

It's quite normal to speculate on current events such as this type of shooting, as they've very sadly become rather commonplace. You don't have to do so, and of course you're allowed to state that you don't want to and don't think others should either, but in turn I will state that I think it's perfectly fine to speculate and warranted in this case, since it's incredibly rare than an XX female would commit a crime like this (even though it does happen in a few extremely rare cases).

(NotSerenaJoy)
This. We are told the shooter is female, but that word is so meaningless in the mainstream now that we don't know what is meant by this information. We shouldn't be having to speculate about this. We should hear that a woman has shot people and be, "Woah! A female shooter, how crazy is that, what does this mean....." Instead we are here wondering, is it actually a woman? The shift in language because of the trans agenda is really messing with everything.

.
.
.

Because we are socialised to not be angry, but to be compliant and passive and most importantly, nice. It's internalised in us to not react violently and certainly not with deadly force. Even when we do reach boiling point, our socialisation still holds us back so that we never or at least very rarely react fully and release everything that is pent up inside of us. It's just not nice to be angry you know.

Men however are socialised in the opposite way. Be angry, be strong, stand up for yourself, don't take shit, never be compliant, get what you want at all costs. That sort of thing just screams "shoot everyone if they look at you funny".

(WrongToy)
I don't want to be blamed as a group for something a male may have done. I found so much of this account, from the 12-hour ride up from Riverside, the shooter knowing where the bf was, the suicide afterward, to have been so male-pattern.

This person is tall, wears scarves around the person's neck often, and in his performances is angry in a male way. Plus, in this person's country, SRS is the prescribed remedy for a gay male.

(Lil_Z)
The other thread appears to have been deleted, for reasons unknown. I hope it's not because the mods think it makes us 'look bad'. As you say, we are perfectly within our rights to speculate about this shooter's actual sex, given that the media is now regularly reporting male crimes as female ones.

Speaking of which, I think this person is almost certainly male. Take a look at the photos in this Daily Mail story, especially the one where he's holding a bunny. Looks like a male body, male neck, male face to me, and I'm a bit baffled that many don't seem to see it.

One of the comments on the DM site says 'Is that a man', but there are many more observing that something looks 'weird' or 'not right' about 'her' face. (One commenter says 'she' looks like an alien, while another says 'she' reminds him of an avatar from the Sims.) I guess femininity cues do throw people, such that their brain will categorise a male person as 'female' based on those cues, while also simultaneously observing that that isn't a female facial structure, hence the uncanny valley feeling that arises telling them that something is 'not right' about the face.

I don't think this will ever be admitted openly by the media. If he'd been a white, US-born TIM it probably would have been, as his trans status would likely have been part of both his social and online identities. But because he is (most likely) an Iranian gay man who transitioned very young, he's unlikely to have been open about being trans to many people, and I very much doubt his family will be inclined to mention it to the media either.

So now we can all be subjected to the joys of think pieces that ponder the meaning and motives of 'female' mass shooters. Just like when trans Twitter engineer Dana McCallum raped and beat his wife, one of the liberal rags (Slate I think) took the case as an opportunity to highlight the problem of 'lesbian' domestic violence.

In the next couple of years, we will probably see handwringing about the inexplicable rise in the number of 'female' rapists and pedophiles, which will allegedly show that our previous beliefs about these being male-pattern crimes were 'wrong'. It really is chilling, how completely the media is cooperating in this Orwellian reversal of reality.

(yishengqingwa666)
Sorry about your penis, inseminator.

various TERFs #sexist reddit.com

Asylum is not gender neutral: the refugee crisis in Europe from a feminist perspective

(black_rad_fem)
What do you guys think about sex-based refugee policy? I recently participated in a panel discussion about violence against women, and one of the panelists mentioned the need for a refugee policy that favors women and children due to them being vulnerable populations.

I think it is also an interesting discussion in the context of the US, because we have many migrants (mainly women and children) who are escaping gang violence in Central America.

Should we prioritize asylum applications based on sex? How can we work as an international community to help women in conflict zones?

(Terfy_McTerf_face)
This is one of the few scenarios in which American men (in my experience) will actually acknowledge that this is a security issue for these women, and that their and their children's safety comes before that of single, able-bodied men. Though I cannot help but wonder if this mentality comes out of racism towards those men rather than a genuine concern for those women.

I 100% support allowing women and children in but not men. Wars are problems created for men, by men, and I have a hard time mustering up any sympathy for them.

(NPerez99)
I see this is marked as controversial, but we should be able to discuss male violence here, surely? I'm not a US native and come from a machismo culture, and that culture is here in the states where my fellow immigrants are but some of it is sanded down a generation later by the impact of US culture on us immigrants. Especially due to the impact (economic) on the women who may be single and working like me. I'm not speaking about traditions, cooking, important cultural or religious festivities because in the US all people are encouraged to keep such traditions, and we do! But that other non-tangible "man" culture (suddenly I can't find words to describe this in English please bear with my rambling), so I understand what you are talking about. Some cultures are more macho violent than others, and if I had a son here in the US today he may be influenced more by my home countries culture than US culture purely due to where I live and the social network we have in this neighbourhood. If some tough gang member types start influencing him as a teen, what can I put against that? Church? I'm personally not religious but my home country and family is very much so, so it would be an easy step to take. But what if the church is where the gang members recruit (don't laugh that has happened) It's something that needs to be addressed but I really don't have an inkling of a solution myself.

(ISLAC)
Hard. Personally, I suggest cultural adoption.

I mean, the culture of my birth country is rotten. There is not much to save, and there are risks in claiming it- like you said. Why bother keeping it?

So I suggest to drop all traditions/ cooking/important cultural and religious activities, and to replace them by those of the new country - changing religions if necessary. They are not much different anyway.

I know it looks like too much to ask, but I believe it is the best choice to make

(womanandchildren1st)
Non-immigrant European women produce violent and/or oppressive males too. I'll wait for the defensive moms of sons to attack this post but I'm probably going to wait forever because apparently it's okay to say stuff like this about brown and black people on this sub

(Administrative_Camel)
Why is it considered acceptable to observe sex-based crime statistics but not race-based ones? Both sex and race are immutable characteristics of birth.

(vulvapeople)
My proposal would be to allow women and children in almost without question (perhaps some screening to make sure we're not admitting cartel lackeys or what-have-you). Once they're settled in, then the women can send for "their" men, which is in direct opposition to how immigration/asylum programs tend to work in practice. Very frequently it's the men who come over first and either send money to their families back home or send for them. In the case of refugees, the way it works in practice strikes me as particularly asinine because women and children are far more vulnerable in war zones and refugee camps than men are. They also run the risk of the door slamming shut after the men arrive and before the men can send for their families, which is happening in Europe as we speak.

AlphaBetaUnlimited #conspiracy reddit.com

Television Stations With Zionist Agenda and Programming

Viacom

CBS TBS SPIKE BET - Trojan horse MTV CMT NICKELODEON - Also, Nick jr. UPN VH1 COMEDY CENTRAL SHOWTIME BLOCKBUSTER THE MOVIE CHANNEL TV LAND

Time Warner

CNN - Crimes committed for the purpose of cnn reports. HEADLINE NEWS - Ditto CARTOON NETWORK TBS WARNER BROTHERS TURNER CLASSIC MOVIES HBO

Disney

THE DISNEY CHANNEL - Propaganda directed at children, if you want to be disgusted, enraged... watch zionist children's 'programming'. Threats to parents and 'anti-learning' for kids. THE FAMILY CHANNEL THE HISTORY CHANNEL - zionist agenda ABC A&E - Supposed Arts & Entertainment... E! ENTERTAINMENT LIFETIME ESPN - zionist themed sports commentary

News Corp.

FOX

General Electric

NBC

The channel may vary, but the mentality is the same, the attempt to further agenda set forth in "the protocols of the learned elders of zion". When it comes to media, whether television, radio, newspaper or magazine, the intent is clear, The side is clear. When it comes to zionism, there is zionist, and anti-zionist; There really is no middle ground. No matter what the medium, be skeptical; read into what is being put forth and the intent. When it comes to crime and events, be aware, many are orchestrated just so they can report on it; we have lost many lives, for blurbs on cnn. Fact check items that make the news, through internet news agencies, multiple sources and the local emergency services. Offer help, support and resources towards the release of evidence; expose and debunk with information you gather.

Complaints regarding various concerns can be submitted to the FCC.

For steps and paths of action towards a cleaner media landscape, search "15 steps toward Media Reform"

To see complete lists regarding media ownership,

www.cjr.org/resources/

Dale Spencer

CamoWoobie1 #sexist reddit.com

[Under "I will never feel empathy for a femoid"]

If I saw a woman being raped while I was walking down the street, I would keep on walking. She isn't entitled to my time, no one is entitled to anything

MarquisDePaid #fundie reddit.com

Native American reservations were for in tact native tribes who decided against assimilating to the White American culture

The American constitution declared natives could and should be aided in assimilating to white society as racial equals if they so chose

T4mvvlc0oxx #fundie reddit.com

I can confirm this as a black guy from Africa.Liberals are fucking detached, unexposed.Theyre always so willing to stick their heads in the clouds at everybody else's expense.

White people are the least racist and actually the most tolerant in the world.Only western civilization that has created a society that can harbor people of different colours and religions.Non-white countries will not tolerate this and do not apologize for it either

FartfullyYours #conspiracy reddit.com

We have just made yet another unprovoked attack on one of Israel's enemies solely for Israel's benefit. For the past year, Israel's backer's have conducted a propaganda campaign in the MSM to convince us that Russia is manipulating the US government. We are truly a nation of idiots.

Humanrespect #fundie reddit.com

I feel age of consent is more of a social construct which doesn't make it any less value if its there to strengthen a society and that includes making children safe, confident and happy. I don't know if criminalising young adults, breaking up families because of blanket laws and telling a happy child that they should feel bad and dirty is necessarily achieving that. If two people through circumstances end up in love, one is 11 lets say, the other is 19. Perhaps their personal circumstances brought them together, over time they bonded, fell in love and as in any such relationship it turned sexual and mutual. The law would say that they should be broken apart, he should be jailed and she should learn that what they did was wrong and dirty and he was a bad man. The result in this case happens to be she becomes afraid of sex, relationships, has confidence and mental issues well into adulthood. Was that application of the law in her interest, his interest or society's interest? How about 11 and 45 year old since a 25 and 45 year old are both adults.

I don't know the right answers but in my mind it's such a complex area that I don't know if hard laws are always the right answer. More focus should be on sex education and I mean not just biology but also relationships.

NiggersAreFilth #racist reddit.com

that was outta line....i didnt try to convince you not to glorify traitors ...so dont try to make me cuddle up to slave traders

lets just be happy these people are dead and rotting in their grave after a total defeat

They all died merely to allow for the emancipation of your grotesque, disgusting nigger ancestors. You and your people have contributed nothing but misery to the once glorious United States, and nigger-loving liberals such as Abraham Lincoln, who is the true traitor in this context, enabled you to harass and bamboozle generations of innocent whites. You have no right to be in the United States. This is not a country your people have assisted in building. You should fuck off right back to Africa. Though I am not of Southern lineage, I would gladly support any attempts to exterminate the niggers in the United States or elsewhere, and I hope to see your ape-like nigger head on a pike someday not too late.

Glagaire #conspiracy reddit.com

Massive Propaganda Push Re. Syria Gas Attack

There is a thread currently trending about the most recent Syrian gas attack and I can't really tell if its populated by people with a serious deficiency in critical and analytical thought or whether its a deliberate attempt to control the narrative. However, after reading more comments than I ever want to repeat I have to assume this is a coordinated effort.

Looking at whats indisputably clear about the situation:

1. There appears to have been a gas attack targeting civilians in Syria.

2. If true, it constitutes a war crime.

3. There has been no investigation and no evidence exists to assign responsibility.

There are a great many tangents this could take in terms of discussing who was responsible for past gas attacks in Syria, suffice to say there was a massive effort by Western governments to link them to the Syrian government and thus provide legitimation for greater direct intervention.

Given this there are a few extra points that are very clear:

1. The Syrian Government was very clearly winning the military conflict by a wide-margin.

2. Even the US is very clear in admitting the Syrian Government is not fighting against 'rebels' but against IS and Al Qaeda offshoots.

3. These latter groups are equally open about their willingness to target civilians and have no qualms about slaughtering women and children. Whether the Syrian Government can be accused of similar crimes is a matter of debate, with the terrorist groups it is established fact.

4. Despite this, the Syrian Government has repeatedly, and very recently, offered ceasefires that allowed these same terrorist fighters (and their families) to leave areas in which they were surrounded and almost certain to be overrun.

5. The Syrian Government would have nothing at all to gain from using gas in the manner of the recent attack. It would generate no strategic military benefits, it would turn the civilian population against the government (bear in mind, the majority of the Syrian people, even the ones who dislike Assad, support the government as a far better alternative to power falling into the hands of the terrorist groups, most of whom came from outside Syria), and most importantly it might allow Western States to take military action that would be the only factor capable of changing the course of the conflict in a way that would benefit the terrorist groups.

6. In contrast, the terrorist groups have every reason to carry out such attacks. Their ideology justifies any sacrifice as long as it furthers their cause and they have displayed a wanton disregard for any form of human life. They have long had access (through both Turkey and early seized Syrian Army stockpiles) to chemical weapons. And, they now have only months if not weeks left before their entire war in Syria grinds to a halt.

Despite the above, the thread originally linked is dominated by comments that do three specific things:

1. Condemn Assad and the Syrian government for the attacks (with many suggesting it demands a strong military response).

2. Calling out an imaginary Russian bot campaign they say is promoting pro-Assad propaganda DESPITE the fact that the thread is clearly overflowing with exactly the opposite type of voice.

3. Denigrating (by means of Poisoning the Well, Ad Hominem and Appeals to Ridicule) a wide variety of alternative news sites and sources. For example, claiming that sites which have supported 9/11 Truth, or are in any way pro-Russia are automatically discredited and incapable of providing relevant information.

The reason I'm posting this is that the thread in question is one of the most glaring, and frankly depressing, examples I've seen of people taking a mainstream narrative and attempting to preemptively crush any and all dissenting views.

My one hope is that the majority of voices in that thread are deliberately manufacturing this attempt at framing the narrative. Because the alternative, that they represent the actual opinions of members of the voting public whose otherwise neutral viewpoints have been so easily swayed by propaganda of the most crude and blunt form, is unbelievably disheartening in regard to the viability of modern democracies and the ability of alternative news to help promote a better understanding of the complexities of modern war and the dangers involved in mainstream media efforts to reduce these issues to puppet-shows populated with morally black (Assad, Putin) and white ('rebel activists', the White Helmets) characters.

JackGetsIt #racist reddit.com

All those systems failed because they attempted to use the state to keep one ethnicity oppressed/segregated. That just doesn't work. The reason it doesn't work is that white people are very empathetic even pathologically altruistic.

Therefore, all you had to do to break apartheid, Jim crow south and English colonization is massive non violent protest which can easily be organized with a few communist infiltrators. South Africa and the American South were basically shamed and guilted by the rest of the world to give up their power and it all starts with communist subversion.

So if the Alt right wants an ethnostate it can't be a South Africa model it has to be an Israel Model. I.e. strict marriage laws, white only birthright citizenship, and tightly controlled borders.
So you can't really go back to a US ethnostate dream you have to find a part of the country (PNW?) that's 90% white and create a new constitution that from the get go controls borders and slowly eliminates non whites through very passive methods. You also have to force employers not to import cheap non citizen labor.
Let's call this new state 'Cascadia.'

Another tactic I'd use is to allow
white Cascadians to marry non whites on the condition that their children do not get voting citizenship until they grow up and marry a Cascadian. So if you do choose to have a mixed race child you're taking a risk; if they don't assimilate and don't get a citizen to marry them they have to live in society as non voting citizen until they have skin in the game (being married to a voting citizen). The children of those couples would get full citizenship because they are 75% white.
This seems like the most flexible non aggressive way to protect white demographic trends while at the same time not turning into a dangerous purity spiral.

If anyone is worried about non whites being mistreated that's bullshit. We have lot's of non-voting people on green cards in the US now and they aren't mistreated at all.

I would even be up for allowing some non white merit based immigration under certain circumstances but they'd again live as non voting citizens until they married.

GlobalPowerElite #fundie reddit.com

[On r/conspiracy putting an image of the Capitol Building with a Star of David overlaid on it in their sidebar]

What foreign country has the largest influence on our government? It’s racist to even mention the most intelligent and wealthy group of people in the world in bed with (sometimes literally marry into) our elite society? They control ME foreign policy and Israel receives billions every year in foreign aid. I could go on and on. The income inequality that is growing so staggeringly? The switch from industrial economy to financial? Half of Americans living paycheck to paycheck? Who do you think benefitted from all of this? They form a large part of the Global Power Elite

This sub is so ideologically blind. Oh btw they created the pc ideology so useful idiots will protect them as they slurp up all the value from the economy through the central banks in every country.

silentGL #fundie reddit.com

If there were not legal repercussions, do you think that you would be intimate with a young person?

If it were legal AND socially accepted (or at least tolerated) then I might be interested in having a kind of relationship with a young girl. I imagine it would be essentially a close friendship and nothing more unless she were genuinely interested in exploring and learning about her body and sexuality, and that anything with regard to that would be done on her initiative. I would make certain she was completely comfortable and in control and that her feelings were paramount, and that she could ask me to stop at any moment and I wouldn't be disappointed or angry. I'd take any health considerations into account (hygiene, condoms etc) and wouldn't do anything to her that could physically harm her, ie penetrative sex. Ultimately though the most important thing would be the emotional connection and making her happy and feel loved.

However, in reality, the legal repercussions and the social taboo combine to result in an almost uniformly negative result (though there are exceptions) for any child involved in such a relationship, even under the conditions described above. The fact that doing so is illegal means putting the child into a situation where they would need to hide such a relationship and feel ashamed or conflicted over it, or reveal it and have their adult boyfriend/girlfriend go to jail, and be told that they were abused and that the adult didn't love them and only used them for their own desires - this is true in some or possibly most cases, but would also happen in a theoretical "positive" adult-child relationship. Either way, the child ends up hurt and thus it can not be justified to engage in such a relationship.

I don't think a theoretical positive relationship as described would necessarily be abuse, but I do think it would be abuse to subject a child to the repercussions of it.

Humanrespect #fundie reddit.com

How can a child consent to sex with an adult?

Children consent to all kinds of things every day. Ask any parent how difficult it can be to get a strong willed child to do anything from homework to kiss that auntie they don't like.

Many children help to look after disabled family members, help to run families, help in so many ways because children are respected and capable members of society. They don't have a vote of course despite often being smarter than many adults and so without any voice in how they are governed they remain the last section of society without a voice or rights.

Now with regards to sex, why is sex so impossible for a child to understand compared to everything else they cope with in normal life? I was a very sexual child, it was one of the few things I knew I enjoyed. There are also books and research that show this is really very common. We as adults just like to present children as asexual beings too sweet to want anything other than play with toys and sing choir songs.

privacyplease1234567 #fundie reddit.com

I've been a longstanding member and contributor to this subreddit and the LGBTQ community, but because of the nature of this subject, and the taboos that go along with it, I'm going to reply using this new account, both for my own privacy, and because I've seen firsthand what accusations of even just sympathy for pedophiles can do to a person's reputation. I know we in the LGBTQ community feel like we have been victimized by society's bigotries and for most of us violence or the threat of violence has been a way of life at various points in our lives. What we have been through, or continue to go through, is really nothing compared to what pedophiles go through, and anyone even suspected of being one is treated like an absolute monster. Imagine not only being physically assaulted, but being under constant threat of murder and having to flee not only your home but your entire country, forced to change your name, and live a life of constant fear, not just during your childhood while there are bullies after you for being "different", but forever. That is what pedophile activists have and continue to face. There's no "It Gets Better" for pedophiles. I'm not willing to risk my own account here and good name to discuss this very taboo and dangerous subject. I think it's incredibly brave of you, silentGL, to even come here and speak to us. I hope you're taking precautions and staying safe.

To answer your questions first: 1) Yes. It is clear by any reasonable definition that MAPs are a GSM. I also think it's shameful and cowardly that we in the LGBTQ community kicked you guys out way back when just to make our own lives moderately easier. Furthermore I think that MAPs will eventually gain more public acceptance and that history will look back at what we did and judge us poorly for it. I think it may have even set some of us in the GSM community back, and made it easier for those resisting social change to divide us and make us weaker overall. 2) Yes. I would be open to MAPs potentially being part of the GSM community again. We never should have kicked you out to begin with. Now that homosexuals and bisexuals have largely achieved widespread acceptance, many are already separating themselves from some of the more rare gender/sexual minorities that have been left behind. Pedophilia, hebephilia, etc. would probably even be an asset since those orientations seem much more commonplace. If people can be more tolerant of MAPs as individual human beings deserving basic human dignity, they can be more tolerant of all GSMs. 3) My thoughts on MAPs overall, it's hard to say. I would like to believe that there are about as many rapists among MAPs as there are rapists among any other sexual orientation. In other words, a small minority of individuals with violent or sociopathic tendencies who aren't interested in having sex as much as they are interested in control and power, and forcible sex is their means of getting that power. I have read that a large number of convicted child molesters have no preferential sexual interest in children, but that children made for a convenient target while they were in the mood to hurt somebody. It's a shame that these criminals, many of whom are not actually MAPs, have painted your entire sexual orientation as monsters.

I do have some personal experience with a minor-attracted person, who I guess would be more precisely classified as a pedophile. When I was five and six years old, a family friend/neighbor and I developed a very strong bond. He was the complete opposite of the pedophile stereotype. He was handsome, he was very sociable and confident, and he was the gentlest person I've ever known. My parents would have him baby sit me, either at his house or mine, and we got along great. I loved and trusted him, and he never had to tell me he loved me back, it was clear in his actions from the very start. He wasn't like other adults, he respected me as an individual, showed he cared what I had to say and genuinely wanted to know what I was thinking. He didn't bully me or boss me around like other adults, or ignore my thoughts and feelings, or treat me as being somehow less than because of my age. I could tell he was different, and I think he knew I was different too.

All the talk from people answering silentGL's questions, saying stuff about kids being unable to consent, I find it remarkable. How many of you knew from an early age that you were different, that your feelings about gender or sexuality were different from other kids? How would you feel if somebody told you you didn't know what you were talking about, that your feelings are irrelevant or unimportant when you're that age? I remember very clearly coming out to my parents in 8th grade, and the hurt I felt when they belittled my orientation as "just a phase". They didn't trust me to make up my own mind about my sexuality then, and many of you are doing the same now to every child that might want a relationship with an adult. You should all take a closer examination of your own childhood feelings. You knew more about yourself back then than you are giving kids credit for today.

Anyway, I was different, and so was he. We both knew it without saying a word. He was the only adult I could really talk to about it though. My parents were conservative and kept pushing me into being more girly, more "normal". They didn't get me, but my closest friend, an adult male, he loved me for me. He encouraged me to play how I wanted, and feel how I wanted, and he'd always listen with great care and attention to when I said things about feeling different from other girls. See, I knew I was supposed to like boys, and I did like boys. But I also liked girls. I was six years old and already knew I was bisexual, I just didn't have the vocabulary for it or knew what sex was all about. This man, this pedophile, he not only accepted me for my orientation, but he told me there was nothing wrong with it either. He encouraged me to express myself, he let me draw pictures of two girls holding hands and being married. If I did that at home, my mom would frown and tell me that couldn't happen and that I should only draw pictures of a boy and a girl living together in a house.

When I was seven years old, the relationship I had with my much older neighbor did become something more than just close friendship. My curiosities about sex led me to very aggressively proposition him. There will be those who say he groomed me, or somehow manipulated me into a sexual relationship, but I was the seducer and he was one of the best lovers I've ever had. One of the reasons I am writing this using a new anonymous account is because I don't want this story to ever be traced back to him. I will always protect him, because even now many years later, I still love him and think of those afternoons at his house with nothing but fondness. I am insulted by those questioning my ability to consent to that relationship, which lasted a full five happy years before I felt I ought to end it, and I can only laugh at the irony of people in this community claiming an unconventional relationship like ours can only result in harm to the child. I ended the relationship, by the way, because I didn't want to hurt him by cheating on him, and at the time I was falling in love with a girl at my school. He was disappointed, but respected my decision, and never pressured me into any more sex even though we continued to be close friends for many years after.

The confidence and strength he gave me growing up, not only in my own sexuality but in myself as a person, is really what helped me survive the hardest years of middle school and high school, struggling to be a bi girl whose parents thought it was just a phase, and the many cruelties that other children heaped on her. It didn't matter that our sexual relationship had ended, I could still go over to that man's house after school and cry on his shoulder and tell him about my awful day. He'd hug me and tell me things would get better, and that the people who hated me were just stupid and ignorant. He wasn't somebody who had exploited me, or used me, he was a man who loved me, the whole me, and always treated me with respect and dignity.

While I cannot say for certain that every MAP in the world is like that man I knew, I do know men like him do exist, and can be a positive in the life of a child. I still get so much strength from his words to me when I was young. When I am having sex today, with a man or a woman, I always remember my first time not as a traumatic experience, but as the high bar of which I judge the generosity and respect I receive in my intimate encounters as an adult. I am not ashamed of my sexuality, precisely because that generous and loving man from my childhood taught me about how natural and wonderful it can be to express, with anyone I love. I learned from him that love is never wrong, and I have the self-esteem and self-respect to know what I deserve in relationships and demand I get it.[It breaks my heart to think that man I loved as a young girl would be arrested, called a monster, and locked away for loving me as much as I loved him.

So yes, silentGL, I have empathy for your kind, just as I have empathy for people of all kinds. I will judge you and others of your sexual orientation on a case-by-case basis, as individuals capable of both good and evil, the same as people of any sexual orientation. I have no more or less reason to be suspicious of you, as I would be suspicious of anyone else. I do hope that, whether you act on your feelings or not, you keep yourself safe and you always show respect for the dignity of those you are attracted to. I hope the world can change for you as much as I've already seen it change for me, and continues to hopefully change for all of us. I hope others who are like me, and remember now as adults such relationships as joyful loving occasions, will also speak out.

hiddenLlama #fundie reddit.com

Hi I am a average student (not a pedophile) that think pedophilia is as normal as any other sexual orientation and just as acceptable.

I believe that the mental anguish that children experience to is due to cultural stigmatization.

I find that the current situation is a witch-hunt on par with what gays experienced and think you are very brave for admitting who you are.

I have these opinion because I done some research into the subject and base my opinion on that research conclusion.

I wish more people would use logos instead of pathos when discussing this matter.


it's literally impossible to have a healthy relationship with a child as an adult.

That is incorrect. It is very possilbe and is in fact normal in a lot of non-western societies. In some it is in fact a rite of passage.

I am sorry, but unless you can provide proof that there is a direct link between sexual activity with children and mental anguish this is nothing but fear mongering.

Next page