All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
Rape holds us back
Rape was only made to withhold us, lower value males to have our sexual needs fulfilled. During all history the guys took what they could by force or by desire, it didn't make a difference because the goal was to breed and create life. This normie society made up restrictions to restrain us from our rights. They cucked us. Our enemies are not the females, they have no other use than to spread their legs, our enemy is the society and the cucked restrictions aka laws who were put on us to restrict us from our true freedom. Morals and laws are only made to hold us back from going rouge. They brainwash us since kids, we are perfect mindless drones until we snap. If you follow laws and abide by moral code you are a cucked slave of the elites.
Honestly, the left really fucked us, and themselves. Without aggressive ethnic replacement programs, the west could be as accommodating towards minority groups as it wanted, hell even keep anti-white discrimination policies in place to get the warm and fuzzies. Now the stage has been set for a massive civilizational conflict, like Sunnis and Shia fighting over control of Iraq in zero sum fashion.
I hardly think pro-white advocacy is illegitimate, all other groups do it all the time. Difference is, your not going to sit in on an NAACP meeting and hear people talk about physically removing whites and instigating a race war. I don't get why this is so hard to understand that this is a dead end.
South Africa is a shitshow. The whites fighting to maintain apartheid have been pretty much vindicated (at least in terms of existential self-interest, if not morally) as it looks like the country is going the way of Zimbabwe. I suppose it just depends which side your loyalties lie. Just like Israel vs. Palestine is an existential struggle where good guys vs. bad guys doesn't matter so much if you have to live there.
To compare America to South Africa or Zimbabwe is way overblown, however. If you're sucked in to the 24/7 outrage news cycle, you might think the sky is falling. I've lived in a multi-cultural area for over 10 years, including shitty neighborhoods, and the legitimate episodes of racial conflict I've seen I could count on one hand and have most of my fingers left over. People for the most part get along. There are ways to advocate for white interests, or fight to assure white homogeneity in certain areas of the U.S., without having to adopt an absolutely sociopathic orientation towards non-whites, in a way that might actually work and seem fair enough to the average person. The alt-right as I see it, is not doing this, even though a simple raising of awareness of their ideology is pushing people to the right in favor of idiotic, delusional leftism.
Hitler worshiping neo-nazis have been around since George Lincoln Rockwell. They have accomplished absolutely nothing besides acting as a cartoonish freakshow that the enemies of the white race have successfully used to demonize any advocacy for white interests or assertion of white identity. The alt-right, if anything, has arisen despite this.
The rise of the alt-right, as I see it, can be attributed to a few things:
The boiled frog of demographic change has made whites more racially conscious and nervous about the future. The left has gone full-retard with blatant anti-white racism, by their own standards, and its obsession with ridiculous issues, like having 57 genders or sex change therapy for 10 year olds is easily mockable and repulsive to a large contingent of the population. The explosion of the internet has caused the media and academia to lose narrative control and the left's internal contradictions are collapsing on themselves when exposed to the light of day. Because of political and financial pressures weighing down on them, both major parties are totally delusional, corrupt, and unable to honestly address issues that people care about in a realistic way. The alt-right has stepped into this vacuum by providing insightful commentary and a compelling alternative interpretation, especially to whites who feel besieged in their own countries. P.C taboos have mentally handicapped political discourse, so the alt-right is one of the only groups contemporarily capable of examining societal trends intelligently and honestly. Trolling may have it's (limited) place, but the idea that the alt-right's rise is due to puerile bigotry, Hitler worship, or a singular obsession with creating white ethnostates, is just wrong. In fact, reliance on the above is a sure road to failure.
I was a fit, pretty attractive, very academically/career-wise successful guy who started getting a lot of attention my last year in college (I'm young looking so it took a while for me to mature). I went from hooking up with a new girl once every 6 months to once or twice a week. One girl was completely smitten. When I got a mysterious form of cancer, it was like all the positive feelings about me dried up overnight because I was no longer useful. As in, yesterday I was cool and they were all fans but today I was no longer cool so I deserved to be treated like shit. I was in a pretty desperate situation, yet my (former) friends used every ounce of my (understandable) neediness as an indictment against me. My male friends were very supportive, but my female friends were awful, especially the ones who had been attracted to me (give or take a few cool girls). I was shocked because this was the antithesis of how I was brought up, where women are these kind, nice creatures who treat you well if you treat them well first.
When I discovered The Red Pill and "Briffault's Law," it really stuck out to me. I started to see patterns in my female friends who were feminists. I'm Jewish, and I grew very disillusioned with the Jewish support for feminism which I saw as good intentions gone awry. As I got healthier, I started reading Chateau Heartiste and my game exploded. I realized that women had different biological attraction triggers. I got into the neoreactionary movement and started learning about HBD and shit. I knew there was some truth to it, because the part of my family that is Jewish all have +140 IQs and are very inquisitive, whereas my goy-ish family is more "White"-thinking but still quite smart.
:
I never let black women around my Dad, heard too many stories. Feel powerless and subordinate to white people your whole life - you can just torture one in their old age. Or you could educate yourself and do better.
[FAQ of the sub]
Is /r/Physical_Removal a hate sub?
If this sub is a hate sub so would /r/FuckRapists. Its no more a hate sub as it would be if it were a subreddit for how people don't like other people who violently beat and rob them, or others. If leftists don't want to be "hated" then don't try to steal our private property or go around causing harm to others.
But why remove them?
http://i.magaimg.net/img/m0.png
The same reason bar owners have security (bouncers) who will evict unruly citizens from their premises.
Anarcho capitalists, libertarians, and capitalists are NOT pacifists. We are against the INITIATION of force and violence. This means we will and must defend ourselves from your threats, or acts of violence. For you to implement communism it requires you to initiate force or agresss upon us, seize our private property to redistribute and abolish property rights. Private property owners may even feel threatened enough for preemptive defensive measures to ensure their safety depending on the severity of the threat. If you don't want to receive our defensive measures or threats to impose them, then don't threaten to seize our private property and implement communism upon us. Just leave us alone!
Why helicopters?
Traditionally the tool of choice (adpoted by Pinochet) was the helicopter. But its not absolute, nor the only method used to protect us.
Helicopter ride = x
Where "x" is whatever method of defense is issued by the capitalists or private property owners. This includes physical removal or eviction from the free society. Of course the market would devise the most efficient defense methods. Helicopter rides are just a meme example and is also fucking hilarious which helps get the message across. Leftists don't value free speech, thus logic and reason does not work. Historically, violence tends to be the language they comprehend the most.
This is also the logical reason why freedom loving people love being gun owners.
Are you fascists??
Protecting oneself from violence and theft of private property is simply called defense, not fascism. It should also be noted that fascism has historically never operated under or advocated free market conditions.
I assume this community supports Hitler's views?
Not really. Hitler was a socialist who hated jews. Although yes some jews created socialism and communism, it also doesn't not mean all jews are socialists and communists. We are not so focused on race here, merely the actions of humans.
Why the love for Augusto Pinochet?
In 1973 things got so economically bad in Chile the great General Augusto Pinochet (pbuh) decided he needed to seastead leftists into the pacific ocean. These actions prevented his nation from become a third world shithole, and subsequently became known as the great “Miracle of Chile”. His meeting with Milton Friedman and adoption of Chicago School Economic Theory improved the prosperity and economic conditions, and led to an improved quality of life for the people of Chile. All countries need a Pinochet.
Ideally, Pinochet's defense and security services should be privatized and provided via competing services within the free market.
A free society requires defense and enforcement of private property ownership, so that individuals can trade and live prosperously. Leftist ideology in its entirety is based upon envy which subsequently enables violating these basic human rights, as such they are a threat that needs to be defended against in order for society to optimally function freely. Statism was Pinochet's only "crime", although minarchists will argue defense is a valid role of the state. Ancap and miniarchist libertarians should support each other until we get to the point were police, military, and courts are all that is remaining of the state.
Augusto Pinochet's great deeds in this world caused him to transcended and evolve into an all powerful meme form, where he now serves Lord Kek in the afterlife.
Do you have to be an ancap to support physical removal?
No not at all. While there's a government (which will be the case for many lifetimes), its perfectly reasonable to be more sympathetic to any liberty or anti leftist politicians available who will provide the most free markets. Anarcho capitalism can be viewed as merely the end game or direction humanity needs to head into for the best outcomes for freedom. The new dogma for the right wing should be to seek positions of government and dismantle the state, and thus protect liberty by removing power from the left, which in turn brings back power to the people and to the invisible hand of the free market, where we are free to make our own choices.
What about the NAP (Non Aggression Principle)?
You can't defend yourself or private property (your liberty) without threats to defend, and a means to physically protect it if action is needed. When a violent mob of rabid commies threatens, attacks you or comes to steal your stuff, dogmatic moralist ideals and trying to explain the NAP to them won't get you very far. They don't even value freedom of speech for a start. Again, we are not pacifists! We must be capable to defend our liberty!
Why do you like Donald Trump?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hOCvWx9Lusc
President Donald J Trump is like a great prophet who has enabled many people to finally see and realize the true nature of the left. He is the great triggerer and also one of the greatest internet shitposters of all time.
Anarcho Capitalists and libertarians need to be pragmatic if they are to have a respected voice and survive into the future. Sure Trump is not an ancap or perhaps even a libertarian, and we aren't realistically going to get an ancap president in our life time. So there's no problem in supporting his measures to cut and slash government as he (Trump) has stated he will. Don't forget under Hillary we would be almost silenced and pushed aside and labelled as crazy as they grew the government and took away freedoms. At least Trumps main audience support the majority of what we say, and the direction we want things to head towards. We now have a president who is a warrior for the private sector, aka the productive people of society who do the heavy lifting for all the parasites to leech off.
Why do you group leftists and liberals into the same group?
I'll stop identifying and grouping statism, communism, progressivism, liberalism, and socialism as being the same thing, when they stop confusing my money and private property as being theirs.
It should be punishable by death for women to have children above the age of 25
All of us that get shit out of rotting vaginas are fucked FOREVER, for something we had no control over.
Fucking selfish bitches.
(Emphasis in original)
"It's because of your opinions on women" Do you think our opinions are written on our face or what?
"It's because of your opinions on women"
Do you think our opinions are written on our face or what?
Racist people have black friends and can hide their racism for so long...
Misogynists can have feminists female friends too.
Mind to explain?
Females use the "entitled" meme to justify slutting around with Chad.
Females on this forum always come on and say that incels are not entitled to sex but give it easily and freely to Chad. Females will never admit that that they are superficial and whores for Chad. Since they say that they are not superficial they have to come up with some sort of excuse why they don't bang Normans as easily and why they don't give anything to incels at all. The pathetic excuse they give to incels is that "you are not entitled to sex", this in their mind is virtuous justification.
Incels are meant to swallow this god awful pathetic excuse and just watch asshole Chads pump and dump willy nilly and tolerate females yelling at you for daring to question why Chad gets everything. When a female berates you for being "entitled" when you question them about whoring with Chad, tell them to cut the bullshit and just admit that they are sluts for Chad.
Suggestion to the English word academy, change the name of women/females to hoochie
Plural would be hoochie groupie.
This is a final suggestion, it makes perfect sense.
The other extreme is less obvious. Any people that allows large scale migration of capable foreigners will become dominated by them.
Look at the Chinese squeezing natives out in Australia, Canada and the Philipines.
I used to have respect for ladies, but now I take it all back
I refuse to recognize females as human any more, we should open up breeding farms and let them exit it once they hit 18, this is beyond IMAGINABLE how a woman has denied me so hard as today, basically she lives a couple of miles from where I do. (We have never talked) So as a birthday surprise I thought I should visit her and declare my love for her.
7 PM I have waited for around 20 minutes in my car to go out and knock on the door. Alright, the time is now 7:30. I go out and knock on her door, an elderly man opens and asks me who I am, i tell him I am one of her friends and he invites me in, now all her family has gathered and a couple of her female friends. I see her coming down after a couple of minutes. ( I was cramming food into myself at this point.) She looks around and at me with confusion. I give her a smile and continue eating. After around 5-10 minutes she says something to her parents in a foreign language and they start looking at me, I pretend not to notice anything. They get up and tell me to come talk with them and their daughter, I go into the other room and they ask me who I am, I explain to them that I have followed their female around and I thought she was very cute so I thought I should come to her birthday party and declare my love for her, which I do. Her father gets INSTANTLY very angry and tells me to leave their house RIGHT NOW. I look in the girl that I like and I can see that she is a bit confused, I tell her, come on, I am a great guy, you can't do this to me, she says nothing and her father LITERALLY pushes me out of his house.
If you ever wonder why I hate women then this is one of the many reasons that they have sunk my pride to ABSOLUTE low levels.
Why do women want a stoic, emotionless rock?
This is one of the things about women that pisses me off a lot. Why do they want men to be these stoic, unmovable rocks who are all strong and masculine and there for her when she's sad and all (but without bending, of course), but when the man is feeling down about whatever, maybe to the point of tears, even, do women feel nothing but disgust that her man is a human fucking being? Who has feelings just like her? Why can't she be there for him to provide emotional support when he needs it? Why does weakness make him less attractive to her? Why can't she be a shoulder to cry on? It basically seems like that women want to be loved while not giving any love back. This is why men kill themselves more than women.
The TRUE reason why incels and former incels prefer younger girls is NOT because of bullshit like "purity" or "older are used up"
It's because of how we crave YOUNG INTIMACY. None of this patriarchy-like bullshit about girls who are virgins and pure and stupid shit. its just experiencing TEEN LOVE. Its getting to live the lost years, enjoying the magic and energy of love and intimacy with those young ages.
Normies misunderstand the reason why incels want young girls (i'm talkiing from 16-onwards, not pedo shit...) because lots of incels themselves don't understand the real subconscious reason why they want them and try to rationalize trough a sense of right, pureness or less degeneracy.
It's all about making up for lost years. It's all about young passion. It's all about feeling like a teen again. It's all about repairing the mind.
Dancing is female way to be a complete slut without having sex
Although she does end up having sex anyway.
I almost feel sorry for the pathetic normies who pretend to be into it too and stupidly move their bodies to horrible music while getting blue balled by Party Stacies in hope that after 3 hours of orgy she'll actually deliver.
Probably only to find her making out with Chad or a luckier normie after the short trip to the restroom.
"But Norman, I was only dancing!"
So. much. fun.
Also fun are the Stacies who think that conveying their love for dancing makes them seem free spirited and special.
The 80/20 rule makes suicide reasonable
Basically, if you're not in the top 20% of chads your life will be miserable. Men only exist to do labor, raise Chad's offspring, and die. I feel, men should have a right to rebel against nature, however. 80% of men should be euthanized or aborted, do tests and analysis to see if the infant will be in the top 20%, if they will not, terminate the pregnancy. Think of all the misery that could be avoided if all non-Chads were granted the freedom of death! And, it'd make women happy, all the undesirable males she didn't want are now dead or never existed and only chad exists, they'd be thrilled! If not 80% of males, the bottom 20% of physical and mental defects such as myself should be euthanized soon after birth or prior to it.
(OP by IFA_MTBL)
The fact that feminists find the men they claim to be against (non sensitive, hypermasculine, misogynistic alpha males) is proof that feminism is nothing but a massive shit test
(randomaccount22223)
This is why you pay attention to a woman's actions and not her words. She claims to want men who act like feminine pussies but loves to get fucked by the dominant 6'4 Alpha. Guys are told to shun traditional masculinity but this behavior is a repellant to females.
(OneDayMorePlease)
If you're a feminist in the west you're probably fucking retarded and a trash species. What a joke of movement for a joke of a species. The welfare species as I like to call it. Depending on men since the beginning of time. Females need to return to being Comfort Females. That is their sole purpose in the universe.
It's just biology. If you were breeding dogs and you wanted to preserve a specific genetic line, the exact same logic would apply.
Letting your male poodle breed with mutt females doesn't affect the preservation of the poodle line. Letting your female poodle breed with mutt males does.
It's not economically feasible for a woman to continue having children while the male can leave and mate with another woman. A woman can only have 1 child at a time while a male can get many women pregnant. More responsibility falls onto the woman and that is why traditionally (and even now in the modern days) women choose a partner and sticks with them. If a white woman picks a non-white partner, then they will have mixed children going forward. Her white lineage is destroyed.
Not that much better. The divorce rates for intraracial marriage are extremely high, only slightly less than WMAF. Besides there are countless Asian women who cannot divorce because they have no financial stability whatsoever. Not only that these children are completely new to this world and they have a completely different worldview and experience. The unknown is unknown.
I wish I could set up a commission to monetarily penalize any interracial divorce.
It's not about fetishes or whatever. People can downplay racial worship disguising as some sexual fetish, when we know the true answer to the relationships. A relationship in which women want to upgrade their lifestyles. This means Chinese women upgrade to Japanese or Korean men. Korean women upgrade to Japanese men. The statistics reflect that. Meanwhile in western countries the fall of the white man has led to both white women and men into East asian worship aka Japanese/Korean worship. The new Hierarchy is being created. Japanese men generally have little interest in foreign women because of obese caucasian women and rampant infidelity. Korean men are happy to take in masses of white women. The leftovers are in China. Sorry that's offensive but its the truth.
Interracial relationships are mostly about sexual conquests from the mans' POV into powerful cultures. Men are just like women and these men secretly worship East asians as superior. Japanese men know that they are at the top of the Asian hierarchy but some have also have secretly already internalized China's monumental dominance and are actually going for Chinese women instead of Korean women. That's how the world works.
Do you understand how sexual selection works? When push comes to shove, women are the last flag bearers of human civilization to create life. They are given the duty to weed out bottom of the barrel males. A man who is confident and well liked will not resort to the interracial marriage market. Very few instances are true love. You of all people should know this-love is not a kpop drama of fluffy wonder dream flying in cloud.
There's literally nothing wrong with racism or sexism.
Nope. If it ain't white, it ain't right. Yes, I'm willing to use DNA testing to filter out Jewish infiltrators and half-breeds that look mostly white.
I would like a nation where all Marxist and liberal policies are banned, so perhaps it wouldn't matter who is voting if such destructive policies aren't allowed. This will take some work to ascertain what is liberal and what is Marxist. The writers of the U.S. constitution did well to ensure they couldn't take guns away.
Marriage will be defined as a union between a biological male and female, and life starts in the womb will both be written into the constitution. Also, the purpose of the nation will be a European ethnostate where things are unequal and unfair. Fuck you, Marxists.
"There are more meaningful things in life"
This normie lie gets told every time an incel mentions how frustrated they are about not having sex. It's incredibly ignorant and selfish when a normie who has sex daily with a woman who loves him, or even worse when Stacy who goes from Chad to Chad, tells incels that "sex isn't all that". You wouldn't tell a starving child that food isn't that great. You wouldn't tell a homeless man that having your own place isn't all you'd hope it would be. Yet for some reason, the only biological purpose humans have is "overrated". NEVER having sex tears away at you and destroys any self respect you had. Normies I beg of you, before you think about responding to anyone here with your bullshit advice, please imagine your life never having anyone love you or think you're good enough for them.
Contradictory normie advice
The common advice I often see here is to "approach a woman as a friend, an equal, without expecting or wanting to get any sex out of it". Apparently, the fact that we don't do this is why we're incel.
But then I also see people saying that befriending women is a terrible way to get laid, and you need to be direct with her about your intentions from the start.
As an LGBT person, I hate the LGBT community. Most of them Marxist snowflakes who want to kill all white straight men. But, I suffer from Gender Dysphoria. I recognize it as a disorder (sorry snowflakes, It is.) and I am against minors editing their bodies due to that dysphoria. That being said I do intend on transitioning as an adult if this dysphoria doesn't pass. Thanks for the concern. But don't worry, I'm not going to degenerate pride parades. Which are truly a disgusting corrupted version of moral elitism.
If you actually had an immigration policy like that we'd still effectively be an ethnostate. I'm talking about only allowing high skilled workers in and deporting all illegals forcefully.
Now lets assume an absolutist scenario where we only take on the best and brightest from Mexico, for example.
What happens to Mexico? We just took all of their bests doctors, chemists, physicists, and hardest workers; the people that would be able to make Mexico a better place.
The other 90% of the Mexican population? You just forced them to live in squalor because the only people that could make their area better just left for greener, whiter pastures.
So what you really want is the best of the best from each ethnicity, and "fuck you" to all the poor people in those countries that can't afford or aren't smart enough to immigrate.
And we get called the selfish ones...
Regarding why Civic Nationalism doesn't work aside from what I pointed out above: In reality the civic nationalists are still operating on some sort of altruistic mission. They end up opening the flood gates to immigration without the ethno nationalists to check them.
Civic Nationalism only works when you can maintain a 90% ish white majority (That's an ethnostate). Otherwise you're just getting people killed by low income, low intelligence criminals. If we need to worry about a criminal underclass, they had better be white.
[Comments under "Map of World War Shows 4,500 Years of Global Conflict" featuring a greater concentration of conflicts in Europe]
@awe300
And this is why Europe shouldn't be afraid of the thing isis calls terror - the whole continent is born from millenia of suffering. What's a few shitty desert pigs?
One word, fascism. Nobody wants to have this system in Europe, but it would be most effective on removing ISIS.
[Comments under "The anti communist alliance" having as OP a pic featuring a Hoppean snake wearing Pinochet's cap and sunglasses, Pepe with a Nazi hat and a bird with the same hat as Mussolini]
@123xyz123xyz
Nazis and fascists are temporarily allowed as commie removal agents. But sadly their helicopters won't have enough fuel for the return trip. I'll miss u pepe.
@EternallyMiffed
They prefer walk-in ovens.
Nazis are National Socialists so they have to go too bud.
Sometimes my intelligence is hindering me from getting females hymen to carefully strap off
I have noticed it, whilst females are laughing about TV, I am thinking of parallel universes and Saddams torture methods, I truly am a man of magnificence. I think I was not meant for this world, I am a star that was destined to shine for a very short amount of time, and leave this earth in an amazing fashion.
I think my intelligence is just too much sometimes and I would gladly trade off 20 points of my IQ just so I could be on the same level as most normies.
My Plan For Incels
I have devised a scheme for incels here that will give you all a happy life. I intend to become rich and save you.
I will round up incels and invite them to come to my private incel compound. It will be monetised and open to visitors to ensure we can live our lives in a luxurious manner. I believe that incels are truly repressed to not know love and I will try and save you all from that.
In the morning we will all meet in a grand hall to discuss and debate whatever we wish, in an organised manner. These debates will be recorded as a piece of history and will be uploaded to the internet. Incels are then given free time to do whatever they wish, I will provide gyms and private grounds to walk, access to the internet and literature, and even a place to talk to normies, chads, stacies, landwhales etc.
Each incel will have their own room. I cannot guarantee how big or luxurious they will be, but I can guarantee that all will be able to sleep in the grand hall if they so wish. Incels will all eat together in comradeship and will be encouraged to be open minded.
Willing females will be allowed in to certain areas where incels can interact if they wish. Those who do not may spend their time building, philosophising or creating art.
At 9pm we will all gather in the hall, and incels will pray to me and ask for better lives. There is no doubt that by publicising inceldom people will take notice and learn to be more inclusive. If not then we will gather enough incels and declare ourselves a new state. You will all slowly but surely become chads, and those with the best genes will be allowed to breed with women who also possess powerful genes. Our eugenics programme will eventually allow incels to function in society, and wipe out this plague that affects you all.
When you get to the age of 20 without even having kissed a girl, you are a freak
Normies that tell me otherwise are lying. Read a thread on PPD regarding when it starts to get weird to be a male virgin. Most said 20 or 21.
When you get to my age without kissing a girl, with doing NOTHING with a girl despite wanting to, you are a freak. You are garbage, and no woman will ever want you.
Non-human animals have no moral worth. Only humans have rights.
Would that mean that, for example, torturing animals for fun would be morally acceptable?
It's undesirable, but it's morally acceptable.
Suppose communal living, or something of that nature, becomes popular and is determined to be better than capitalism in a society of free association. Would you mind this? I'm just wondering if acceptance of another system, if it is proven to be better in the free market and in the realm of free association, is an opinion that the others here and in the world share.
It would be consistent with my political system, but inconsistent with my value system. I don't like communal living, just like I don't like drug use or diversity. There are many immoral, undesirable things people can do that are still legal under libertarianism, I'll oppose them all.
I'm curious, what about diversity don't you like?
I value those more genetically similar to me and my cultural traditions in general. There's also the fact diversity increases social tension and conflict.
It's a spectrum, almost everyone prefers homogeneity over diversity at least a little. This is explained by evolution, it makes sense that people would care more when their community is more genetically similar. The empirical evidence backs this up, areas with greater racial diversity exhibit lower social trust, between and within races. Race riots in prisons and schools, the disproportionate Black on White crime, the fact most genocidal/tribal conflicts occurs within the same border, and the balkanization of groups under our democratic system of government suggests diversity is not desirable.
so you dont mind the conflict that occurs when humans interact with other species of animals. you like that kind of diversity, because your side always wins.
Animals are insignificant compared to humans, I don't attribute any moral worth to them. Humans share my genes and general behavior, as well as the fact we are a breeding population. I value the existence of some higher mammals, like Apes and Canines, but they have no place in my ethical system. I care about the lives of other humans, while I don't care if animals suffer at our hands.
Say you see a car in a parking lot, it is 95 degrees outside, the car is not running and there is a child or an animal inside of it. If you broke into the car to save the life of the animal or child, are you violating the owner's right to his property? Thoughts?
Children are one thing. I'd say it's fine to break into a car to aid one. The parents are acting criminally, your response to their negligence would be justified.
Animals have no rights and are only property. You may not break into someone's property to help them.
Other humans share the bulk of my genes, so there is an evolutionary advantage in not harming others. Survival of our genes is all that matters, everything we do or feel is in service to that prime directive. I'm not concerned with arguments of "sentience," one has rights simply by virtue of being human. Perhaps if some non-human was as advanced as humans we would be forced out of necessity to recognize legal rights, but I cannot recognize the ethical rights of non-humans.
What about those humans who possess inferior or defective genes
They have as much of a responsibility to ensure the survival of their genes. Not sure what you're asking.
What advantage is there in not harming a infertile cripple over not harming a dog? If a person is not intelligent enough to understand the concept of property then surely by your definition an act of aggression against them would not be morally wrong.
If the person is a threat, or acts criminally, then their life's value does diminish. If they are extremely mentally disabled, then they're basically the property of their family.
I don't see what impotency has to do with anything. We are a social species, and as such depend on others aid. Harming innocents hurts social cohesion and others would target us as a threat to overall safety.
so if you saw someone torturing a dog you wouldn't try to stop them?
Probably not. I would certainly speak up, but likely not use force. Of course it's also possible my emotions may outweigh my rational thought and I would use force, but I hope I wouldn't.
If you reach the age of 20 and you still have yet to see a naked female, you are doomed
Family nudity, strip clubs, porn, movies and such don't count. Nudity before adolescence/puberty also doesn't count as you the time thought girls were gross because they had cooties. I'm talking a woman who isn't your moher either being voluntarily nude around you or not minding you seeing her nude.
My three lifelong fantasies
1. Having mental powers to kill everyone around me
2. Having a female twin who finds out about my existence and comes to find me, killing everyone around me in the process (EDIT: yes obviously we also have sex)
3. Just killing everyone around me using any tools available
I have similar views to many of these guys - alt right, anti-feminist.
Maybe I can help to describe how some of these men feel (but I don't think it applies to all of them, some of them don't deserve to be on the list).
If you really think that your own race of women have been corrupted, it is natural to look elsewhere. Traditional morality held that a woman should be chaste before marriage, that the marriage vows were sacred, and divorce was either illegal or scandalous. And also, women would stick to more feminine/maternal activities.
I do deeply resent the fact that these things have changed. If you are a white man looking for a wife in the modern environment, you encounter women who care more about their careers than getting married, who might not have a strong desire for kids (they've been told it's not important), who might have had a lot of sexual partners, and who have a divorce court system in their favor. I don't know for sure if this is true or not, but let's assume it's also true that obesity, drug use, alcohol abuse, and tattoos/piercings are more common now than they were for most previous generations.
So if you're in this environment and you don't like it, you might feel that it is too hard to find someone you're happy with. It is tempting to say "screw this" and go somewhere the odds are in your favor.
It's sort of like the conservative white guy is a foreigner in his own country now. The culture he's swimming in just doesn't feel right. Maybe it's like being a freshwater fish thrown into the ocean.
But as I wrote on a post here the other day, I do now think that it is a mistake to date outside your race as an escape from what you see as the current defects with your own culture. And it's particularly unfortunate if you find someone who will marry you not for you as an individual but because she values your race.
Ultra-conservative white men who are tempted to go Asian should remember:
"It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent. It is the one that is most adaptable to change."
[OP from "What do you like most about helicopter rides?"]
I think, as the leftist falls into the sea below, they have time to reflect upon their life decisions before their life achieves finality. I want them to know their beliefs and hatred has no place in healthy, civilized society, right before they hit pavement.
It's the psychological part that I like.
I'm tired of seeing feminist cunts and bluepill fags tell us it's our personality.
If that was the case, then why do the assholes over at /r/theredpill get laid so frequently?
Either it's our persssssonalityyyyyyy or everyone who posts at /r/theredpill is a liar.
Pick one normiescum. Just fucking pick one and stay consistent.
No, this isn't a "the lefties are the REAL racist", but its an interesting thing I noticed among them.
Many leftists, especially those who hate the Alt Right, even the fools lurking this sub trying to downvote everything here, all of them believe that whites are inherently superior. All of them. None of them really believe that whites were EVER equal to other races. Many of them recognize the same racial truths that our ancestors noticed time and time again, but the left has such a pathological mindset that they repress the truth and express a hatred towards that truth. I always wondered how leftists grew to hate white people so much, that their hatred is strong enough to influence even their own perceptions on their policies. It can't just be anti-white propaganda can it? After all, the same leftists can argue that individualism, capitalism, and free speech is evil when they view such concepts under a white male, but then these same leftists will preach that collectivism and identity politics is evil when the Alt-Right whites starting adopting these concepts. Many weak people tend to become far leftists, they seem to have adopted this mentality and show a hatred towards success and the strong, so their hatred of white people may in fact, just be another branch of this general pattern of thinking. Formed by their resentment, insecurity and acknowledgment of whites being superior.
The left inherent belief in white superiority may also be another driving force in why the left deliberately attacks white interest groups far more then black or Latinos or Asians interest groups, despite the fact that many of them exists and some actually exert influence on our politics. It's because they don't take them seriously. Just like me, they probably don't take black nationalist very seriously because they'll never really be able to accomplish their goals, but white nationalism scares them because deep down, they believe that white nationalist can succeed and that the white-ethno state will objectively end up being a good place.
Of course, the left embrace of white supremacy is different from the Alt Right. The left just unquestionable accepts the concept because of their feelings. The Alt Right hardly embraces any real form of "white supremacy", they simply want a white ethno-state. The acknowledgement of "white supremacy" is simply the acknowledgement of objective facts, that whites have played a major role in technological advancements and in building advanced societies. However, the things that whites surpass at are considered "superior", so that's why the left can unironically see white supremacy in anything.
The fact that the left believes in white supremacy is why its so hard to have serious discussion about race with them. They emotionally are unable to. I noticed, people have tried to be rational with these same leftists, pointing out their racial double standards and that they are acting no different from the "racists" they hate, and it simply slips from their back. But the moment you talk about racial differences in IQ, oh now it begins to affect them. Why? Because you are unintentionally confirming their repressed worldview and they are experiencing cognitive dissonance.
The Alt-Right is pro-White male-Asian female thing is just a meme. Some White nationalists race mix because White women have been corrupted by Liberalism. Most of them don't. And it's White Liberals who are really promoting race-mixing far more than any other group.
5 Stages of Inceldom
1 Denial
"I'm not incel! I'm just not great with ladies. Few more weeks at the gym and another self help book and I'll be drowning in poon!"
2 Anger
"These whores need to pay for rejecting me. Chad shouldn't get every woman damn it."
3 Bargaining
"Cmon girls, what if I pay for your dinners and movies, then will you look at me at least?"
4 Depression
Where most of the people in this sub seem to be, contemplating suicide, laying down and rotting, etc
5 Acceptance
The ultimate form of an incel. The final destination. This is when you get Wizard Powers. This is the only way we can end our misery outside of suicide and getting a woman.
I don't think Whites should have equal political rights in Asian countries, especially not if they don't assimilate and respect Asian values. And I hold minorities in Western countries to the same standard.
Progress is a unique feature of Western civilization. With the exception of the introduction of technology, the entirety of the third-world has made no progress and continues in the natural state of man--constant, low-lying ethnic/tribal warfare.
Furthermore, who says we're against technical change? Whenever a leftist brings up "progress" it is almost inevitably in the social sphere, which yes, we do oppose. Currently speaking you have to be detached from reality not to notice that the threats to technical and scientific advancement are from the left who engages in suppressing work that doesn't fit a political narrative and who also peddle postmodernism which kills objective research.
No, diversity sets off warning bells and as I've said in a previous post, raises transaction costs and harms moral and social norms. The moral emotion of purity most likely developed to prevent such a thing from happening--you cannot diversify the heartland of a nation without repercussion.
To flip this, I find it funny that you people never assume that racism reciprocates. Native Americans were brutal to the settlers and currently blacks disproportionately commit crimes on whites, including rape which to my knowledge is not rooted in economic issues.
"The old system often benefits you conservatives, explaining why most of you are white. The old system benefits you mainly in wealth and society. Discrimination still exists because we have not foregone this system that doesn't work in today's society anymore."
Ding ding ding We aren't cucks who are going to go quietly into the night. We want the institutions that we helped build and were built for us to continue to benefit US. The bourgeois sold out the American white middle class and we won't forget it.
"Discrimination still exists because we have not foregone this system that doesn't work in today's society anymore."
Discrimination exists because multi-ethnic democracy and a multicultural society are alien and should be done away with. I'm not discriminatory toward Mongolians because they're on the other side of the Earth.
Why is an ethnic separation so apocalyptic to you? Or are you really using sheep's clothing to dress up the right for the global downtrodden to use our country as a battered women's shelter?
Not all of us view this as an "all or nothing" situation. First off, I think that countries as large and with as many different types of people as the USA don't really work as a cohesive unit to begin with. People feel disconnected from the country as a whole. I'm also against imperialism so I don't see land expansion/conquering as vital to a nation's interest.
Therefore the answer in my mind is to break the nation apart into sections that make sense. There could be sections for the different major racial groups in the country (white, black, mestizo/amerindian), sections for political ideology (socialist, libertarian) and sections for religious affiliation (protestant and catholic).
I would be content with whites having a race based state encompassing at least one region - preferrably either the Pacific Northwest, Great Lakes states, or New England. Anything larger than that would be great, but anything less than that would be unacceptable.
The exchange of goods and ideas can continue without the exchange of people. No reason for us to not be on good terms with our neighbors of varying races/beliefs/faiths so long as our borders are clearly defined and respected.
Nobody would really be kicked out of the country, but rather just maybe have to move a few states over in order to live with other people like themselves.
