Yes, the right-wing is much more violent and a little more crazy than the left-wing.
Nevertheless, Free Speech still holds. If you don't like it, feel free to move to a more-restricted country whose range of allowed speech is more amenable to you.
11 comments
“Nevertheless, Free Speech still holds.”
Yes, it does. But ‘free’ does not mean ‘without consequences.’ It’s not violation of your first amendment rights if i tell you to shut the fuck up you boneheaded imbecile.
SIGH
Let me make this perfectly clear, to everyone. Free speech is a right, yes. BUT like any right it stops the very moment it starts impeding upon the rights of others. So once you’re abusing said free speech to incite violence, hatred, and crimes upon fellow human beings, you start forfeiting said right to free speech.
Likewise, as much as people have the right to be assholes in their opinions, so do others have the exact same right to vocally disagree with them. That is not the same as denying those first people their free speech.
Yes, the wight-cringe is much more violent and a little more lazy than the terf-wing.
Nevertheless, Spree Chef holds still. If you don't move it well, feel free to like a Moore-restricted country whose range of toad speech is more nameable to you.
…so terrorists such as IS have every right to say what they want?
Think very carefully before answering, OP.
GCHQ - and MI6 - have ensured that people are still alive to this day, especially via relevant data shared with the FBI, CIA & NSA: the ‘Special Relationship' and all that jazz. Question:
Should they have denied the neo-Nazi National Action of more than just their ‘Freeze Peach', after they were declared a terrorist group…?!
National Action here in Britain. Pout Boys, Buggarloo Boys etc: especially all those at DC on 6th January 2021. No Difference. A question that makes all the difference:
How many committing that terrorist action in the US on 6th January 2021 were left -wing…?!
…like I say: think very carefully before answering. Because if - based on the answer we’d expect - you don't like it, feel free to move to a less-restrictive country whose ‘Opinions' are more in line with yours:
Afghanistan.
Your laws and attitudes about a person being able to publicly scream: GET ’EM at a target minority without an instant and throughout repercussion by the legal system were actually major factors in making fucking damned sure I chose Canada as my new home.
What the bloody fuck is so controversial in restricting the ability to sick others on a person or to make double sure you are not allowed to peddle for limiting human rights or outright extermination of those you find objectionable? How is the ability to literally sic people on people somehow protected under free speech in US? Frankly, I did not much care to find out how, so I just made it to a place where none of this is a problem. You get to express yourself however the fuck you want but as soon, as you point a finger at a person or a group of people indeed and start screamin “Kill them!”, we get to call the cops and have you processed as the criminal shithead, you are.
the right-wing is much more violent and a little more crazy than the left-wing
...and as of nary 24 hours ago when the right-wing Alex Jones has been out-crazied by the white rightards' last best dope... er, I mean 'Hope' for a 'meme' candidate in the shape of Kan'tye Worst, you know you have problems.
In more ways than one.
Free speech still has consequences. Libel, slander, stochastic terrorism are among them. I guarantee if OP were called paedophile and had others sayinv things that could lead to violence against them, they'd quickly be for restricting speech
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
