(responding to story “Calif. Man Charged With First-Degree Murder After Allegedly Forcing Girlfriend to Ingest Abortion Pill at Gunpoint”):
I wonder if any Pro-Choice men and women will come here and defend this woman who did not want to end her pregnancy. Her choice was to continue this pregnancy. But was forced by the father to end her wanted pregnancy. The Pro-Choice men and women always says it should be the woman's choice not the mans choice. So how come these men and women are not coming to her defense?
17 comments
yes they would… They believe its’ a WOMAN’S CHOICE OVER WHAT SHE CAN DO WITH HER BODY, if she wants to have a baby, they won’t give a shit, if she doesn’t wants to have a baby, they won’t give a shit… that’s why they’re called Pro-Choice… they care about is a woman’s control over her body above all else, if she wants an abortion, she can have an abortion, if she wants a baby, she can have a baby, IT DOESN’T MATTER TO THEM LIKE IT DOES TO YOU ‘pro-life’ HYPOCRITES
The individual woman's choice, the individual woman's body: and nobody else has the right to so much as think of deciding for her.
This precedent will be a shot in the bollocks to those in certain states pushing insane anti-abortion laws: certain scenes with Sondra Locke & a snubnose .38 in the Clint Eastwood 'Dirty Harry' film "Sudden Impact" spring to mind.
It seems to me that some of these people actually think that pro-choice people just want to kill potential babies. I had hoped that this was just propaganda on their part and they at least know internally how ridiculous this is, but no. Apparently they literally can’t think of any other reason even if they are constantly told what the actual reason to be pro-choice is. That’s taking reality denial to a whole new level!
OF COURSE, we are going to defend the woman who didn’t get to CHOOSE about her own body.
It’s not about denying men rights, it’s just that nothing is happening to THEIR bodies. Trans-men with functioning wombs are of course the ones who decide about what happens in those wombs.
A couple ought, ideally, to be in agreement about whether to carry on, or to terminate. If they are NOT agreeing, then it’s the one with the pregnant body, that has final say.
Fundie Christians failing to understand that Pro-Choice means letting women decide for themselves whether to have a baby or not. Then again, a lot of fundie Christians don't believe in women having a say in anything; Daddy gets the say before she's married and hubby gets the say afterward- oh, and Daddy is the one who says whether she can marry this man or that man.
Yes; We would defend this poor young woman if she wanted to keep the pregnancy. We’re called “Pro-CHOICE” for a reason!
Also; I did not read the article but did this scumbag kill this woman when she refused or does the “First-Degree-Murder” charge refer to the Fetus?
Either way; Mr. Jerk is in deep doo-doo.
@Titania #25136
Sad to see her pregnancy ruined. That said; At least she’s okay (at least physically). Quite frankly, wit a guy like that, perhaps it’s for the best that those two aren’t connected by a child.
He’s still a monster, though.
I wanna give that woman a big hug.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
