In response to the Colorado shooter.....
This has all the wrong elements.
No AR15
Not republican
Hates Christians
Likes trans
Likes drugs
This will be off the news in 2 days with little or no coverage
Clarence Mason Weaver was once so filled with hatred towards white people in America, that he broke up with a girlfriend who had a white dog, the now-conservative told The Daily Caller New Foundation in this exclusive video interview.
A formerly hate-filled, Berkeley Black Panther liberal, Weaver is a black conservative who now holds strong views on Black Lives Matter, the first black president and how America can heal its racial divide.
From humble beginnings, Weaver served his country in Vietnam working as a pipe fitter in the Navy. It was an incident on August 11, 1971 that changed his life forever: A white racist tried to kill him just because of his skin color.
Retelling a riveting transformational story, Weaver explains how even in the midst of running with radical U.S. haters, he realized “he loved America” and only wanted a chance to compete fairly in the country.
Today, when asked what he thinks of the emergence of Black Lives Matter, he passionately says “it really means black lies matter.” He explains that this group believes in white superiority since they demand white society give them concessions out of guilt. Mason says, “What happened to you white folks? Where are the Vikings? You guys are cowards!”
As to his views on the first black president, Weaver continues his bold, unique tirade with “Barack Obama hates America.”
“His job is to divide by differences and manage our differences,” he says. “He has done nothing but drive us apart. [He] hates America.” Weaver then adds, “It doesn’t matter what color the pimp, the drug dealer, the con artist is.”
In this 31-minute video interview, Weaver explains that God helped him realize that “anger was much heavier than a ton and a half of steel,” which altered his physical and emotional life in 1971.
“What would happen in black America if we forgave, real or imagined, the wrongs that we have?” he asks. “As a Swahili-speaking, black history-studying, militant, Black Panther-hanging out man. As a black man, wearing my dashiki and my black beret,” he notes. “What would happen is healing, progress and success with family reunification.”
Since he left liberalism and became so vocal, Weaver has been called all the epithets that black conservatives incur. Weaver explains why black conservatives are so maligned and hated by those he says are “running today’s plantations” with destructive liberal policies. Liberalism, he says, “destroys people, like a drug dealer, a pimp who manages you and wants to keep you down. Liberalism is slavery, always has been and always will be.”
As for how to change other people’s minds, he warns, “some have a vested interest in staying stupid.” Those who won’t hear or listen “have the right to be stupid.”
For more on Clarence Mason Weaver check out his books, website and video commentaries. Follow him on Twitter @masonweaver.
In their statement on the Orlando terror attack, the activist group Black Lives Matter blamed white supremacy, the patriarchy and capitalism for the attack in which Omar Mateen killed 49 people.
“Despite the media’s framing of this as a terrorist attack, we are very clear that this terror is completely homegrown, born from the anti-Black white supremacy, patriarchy and homophobia of the conservative right and of those who would use religious extremism as a weapon to gain power for the few and take power from the rest,” the statement said.
“Homegrown terror is the product of a long history of colonialism, including state and vigilante violence. It is the product of white supremacy and capitalism, which deforms the spirit and fuels interpersonal violence,” the statement continued.
The statement later claimed that religious extremism “is not new to America and is not unique to Islam. For centuries, religion has been used to subjugate queer people of color and lay the groundwork for our deaths.”
After listing the names of those killed in Orlando, the statement called for “a new vision for safety that prioritizes human rights and does not facilitate deadly violence. We need a world that realizes that the word ‘terrorist’ is not synonymous with Muslim, any more than ‘criminal’ is synonymous with Black,” the statement said.
“The enemy is now and has always been the four threats of white supremacy, patriarchy, capitalism, and militarism. These forces and not Islam create terrorism. These forces, and not queerness, create homophobia.”
“Until these systems are defeated, until anti-Blackness no longer fuels anti-Muslim and anti-queer and trans bigotry, exploitation, and exclusion — we can never be truly free.”
The person who will lead America to its end is Hillary Clinton. I don't know how to say it any clearer - Bill and Hillary are pure evil. All the stories about them while in Arkansas are true - murders, cocaine smuggling, money laundering and they continued their evil activities when Bill got into the White House. They continue today with their Foundation which is nothing but a front for money laundering. It is not right wing conspiracies which Hillary continues to imply and the people whose deaths are connected to the Clinton's will never have justice. Why is it that every time a Grand Jury was to be convened and people were subpoenaed to testify against the Clinton's, it never happened and some of those people ended up in prison, dead or disappeared. Anyone who has ever had files implicating the Clinton's of illegal activities either commits suicide or was murdered.and the files have disappeared. People if your voting for or have voted for Hillary - do your homework and learn about who you vote for?
And white privilege means you're TWICE as likely to be shot by police - even though blacks are 150 times more violent than whites. And white privilege means you're more likely to receive the death penalty - even though blacks commit well over half of all murders. And white privilege means you're more likely to be incarcerated - even though blacks commit more crimes and more repeat crimes. And white privilege means you're more likely to receive a traffic citation - even though blacks commit more traffic violations. And white privilege means you're more likely to be prosecuted for a hate crime - even though blacks commit 25 times as many violent crimes against whites.
Young black men represent just over 1% of the population and they commit 53% of all murders but there are more whites sitting on death row than blacks. Blacks commit more felonies than whites but America's prisons have a higher number of whites than blacks. Statistically, Americans are nearly 2800 times more likely to be killed by a black than a Muslim terrorist.
Alabama Congressman Mo Brooks said that the Democratic Party is waging a “war on whites” during an interview with conservative radio host Laura Ingraham Monday.
Brooks, who has been dubbed a member of the “GOP deportation caucus” because of his opposition to the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy, was responding to reporter Ron Fournier’s assertion that “the fastest growing voting bloc in this country [Hispanics] thinks the Republican Party hates them” and that the GOP “cannot be the party of the future beyond November, if you’re seen as the party of white people.”
“This is a part of the war on whites that’s being launched by the Democratic Party,” Brooks said. “And the way in which they’re launching this war is by claiming that whites hate everybody else. It’s a part of the strategy that Barack Obama implemented in 2008. He did it again in 2012, where he divides us all on race, on sex, greed, envy, class warfare, all those kinds of things.”
Even Ingraham was made somewhat uncomfortable by his rherotic, saying “that characterization’s a little out there.”
“That is in effect what they’re doing, though,” he insisted. “That’s the political game they’re playing.”
“I just think that phraseology might not be the best choice,” Ingraham demurred.
Brooks also had some choice words for the Wall Street Journal, who he said need “to get their head screwed on right on this one.” WSJ published an op-ed harshly critical of the GOP on Sunday, warning that “A party whose preoccupation is deporting children is going to alienate many conservatives, never mind minority voters.”
“They need to be Americans,” Brooks shot back. “They need to be patriots. And they need to think about America first, and they need to think about American families first, but that seems to be the furthest thought from their mind.”
He also talked about the difficult week he and some of his fellow Republican congressmen had for opposing Speaker John Boehner’s immigration spending bill, which was so popular that it was withdrawn before it even came to a vote. (RELATED: Little Loved Immigration Bill Withdrawn By GOP)
“Those of us who were voting no under the circumstances–we caught a lot of angst and ire from the other [Republican] members, but that all flipped on Friday once we got a good bill,” he said, referring to the $694 million bill eventually passed by the House, “and all of a sudden the other member of the GOP conference were coming to us en masse and saying ‘you know, you were right, we didn’t realize that what we put out there had so many flaws in it, thank you for doing what you’re doing.’”
“The number one thing about any country is geography,” he said. “You’ve gotta have borders. And if you can’t secure your borders, you don’t have a country.”
Homosexuals, and Muslims and Religious Atheists, want what Jews already have. Inordinate control over the 'other'.
Notice that each special interest group is anti-American and are about 2% of the total population.
[Colin Powell says "certain elements" in the Republican Party demonized minorities and women]
Powell is showing who he truly is and always was. Oprah has done the same. They acted the way they had to to succeed in what they perceived to be the white man's world. Now that they have a white/black president, they think they can show their racism and it won't harm them.
On a break from pretending to believe they live in a country bristling with violent white racists, the Non-Fox Media have been trying to debunk stories about the “Knockout Game,” in which young black males approach random strangers and try to knock them out with one punch.
The left’s leading line of defense against the Knockout Game is to argue that young black males have always been violent, so, hey, this is nothing new.
You’re welcome, black America!
In Slate, Emma Roller wearily recounted other episodes of black-on-white violence in order to announce: “The ‘Knockout Game’ is a myth.”
Reminiscing about the flash mobs that shook many parts of the country a few years ago, Roller wrote: “I remember the summer of 2011, a story about a crowd of (black) teenagers at the Wisconsin State Fair randomly attacking fairgoers went viral as a sign of a burgeoning race war.”
So you see, stupid right-wingers, young black males have always been violent, so what’s the big deal about the Knockout Game? Your honor, my client’s not a killer; he’s a serial killer.
MSNBC’s Chris Hayes reached for a different example of monstrous black-on-white violence in order to dispute that the Knockout Game is anything new.
Looking like a translator for the deaf with all the air quotes he had to make for “supposed” “trend,” and “Knockout Game,” Hayes compared it to what he called the fake trend of “wilding” after a mob of black youths violently attacked and raped a white woman jogging in New York’s Central Park in 1989. According to Hayes, “there never was such a thing” as wilding.
[...]
The following year, 1990, blacks committed 57 percent of all the violent crime against whites, while whites committed only 2 percent of the violent crime against blacks, according to the Department of Justice’s annual Victimization Report.
Thanks for the memories, Chris!
Oh, and contrary to Hayes’ proclamation, black men raping white women is something of a “trend” — at least according to FBI crime statistics. At least since 1997 (I got bored and stopped looking any farther back) blacks have raped several thousand white women every year, while white-on-black rapes have numbered between “0.0? and “Sample based on 10 or fewer.”
Non-political junkies don't remember the 2004 election cycle. But I do, like it was yesterday. This Ditka thing lasted for weeks. There was a point it seemed almost a certainty that he would run.
What I also remember was all the headlines from that time "Muslim State Senator to run on Democrat ticket," and then later, "First native African elected to United States Senate" and "Kenyan Barack Hussein Obama elected to US Senate."
You cannot find these stories anywhere, at all these days. Only one single one still exists, cached from an AP story that ran in a major African newspaper.
For those who say Obama is not a Muslim, and use derogatory terms like "Birther" to describe those of us who were around in that 2004 election cycle, I say screw you! You're the denier.
How about New Black Panther hunting season? Isn't that essentially what the racist black people are accusing us crackers of? You really have No shame darkies. No shame at all.
Egypt and Africa are to different places.Two different people.Not the same.The Pyramids were not made by Africans.They were made by the fallen Angels.They were in Sumeria before Egypt.Before that they were the sons of God.Now they are Khazar's,or Zionists.Some call them Jews,not true.Research history.Africa never built anything because the royal family's,also from Khazar blood did not allow that.They think of blacks as useless feeders,worthless,soulless,and stupid.Look around at their areas now and you see destruction,murder,assault,rape,and robbery are the skills that feed.Much as I despise them,they are right.Give them 21st century technology and they still live like animals.
I say build a time machine, go back and do it - white people, pick that cotton!
Come back to the present and Michelle O, instead of that gratuitous (and still unfilld) $315,000 "Diversity Hospital Program" position she had in Chicago would instead be servin' up da fries at your local McD's!
BO would still be walking around trying to prove he cares and perhaps the Nobel committee would have awarded that Peace Prize for a second time to Yassir Arafat.
It's possible.
I can not wait until hispanics become the majority. Then let the hispanic men suffer the rath of things like affirmative action. There is only 1 majority.....and that is white men. The only ones that can't win by being the best at what they do......not as long as there is a hispanic or black or any other minority that wants a position.......they move to the front of the line. I can't wait for the day to whine and whine about how the hispanic men are discriminating against me......suing anyone who gives a job to a hispanic man over me.
Of course I'll be dead by the time it happens....but its been years and years of discrimination against the white man just because there are more of us.
At least Bush wasn't a dumbass or a liar, and he WAS a natural born American Citizen, which BHO has yet to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt. You can buy any paper in Chicago if you have enough money. If BHO is not rich, who is paying the at least$5M to keep his records sealed???Ever wonder about that?? He has been a dirty politician since he got into politics. Getting private papers of his opponents unsealed to get them to step down out of the race, You like this in a prez???Not me. Something smells like a cover up to me, just like Benghazi is/was.
The leader of a group of black pastors opposed to gay marriage lashed out at President Barack Obama during a Tuesday appearance at the National Press Club. In his remarks, Rev. William Owens accused Obama of being “unprofessional” for ignoring him and insinuated that Obama had condoned child molestation by endorsing gay marriage.
“For the homosexual community and for the president to bow to the money as Judas did for Jesus Christ is a disgrace and we’re ashamed,” said Owens, the president and founder of the Coalition for African American Pastors.
“If you watch the men who have been caught having sex with little boys,” said Owens, “you will note that all of them will say that I was molested as a child. A man molested me in my home, wherever they will say they were molested. And for the president to condone this type thing knowing the full facts is just irresponsible.”
Owens added that the “president is in the White House because of the Civil Rights movement, and I was a leader in that. And I didn’t march one inch, one foot, one yard for a man to marry a man and a woman to marry a woman. So the president has forgotten the price that was paid — where they gave their blood to have equal rights in the United States.”
Owens said that Obama endorsed gay marriage “because of money” and bellowed: “there are more people that want marriage to be right than there are homosexuals, I assure you, in this country, and I think he’s going to learn that lesson.”
(Elitist Assholes Say the Darndest Things?)
First, the federal government would create a government “brand” of essential food items such as milk, cheese, meat, cereal, vegetables, bread, peanut butter, beans, juice, soup, baby formula, diapers, etc., and would package the items with simple black-and-white labels and basic descriptions. The word “Government” would be stamped across the top in bold letters so everyone would know it was a welfare item. These items could be manufactured by major companies through government contracts, thus not creating a net loss to private industry. Because competition is not an issue, taste and quality, with the exception of the baby formula and baby food, would not be a top priority. Snacks, soda, cigarettes and beer would not be available through the program.
Second, the government would lease existing store fronts and set up “government stores.” There are typically several grocery store locations that have gone out of business in any given area; these would make ideal settings for the new government stores. The number of store locations would be chosen based on the size of the area and its number of food stamp recipients. The stores would be placed on public transportation routes for convenience.
Third, and most importantly, all food stamp recipients would be required to spend their government dollars at these stores. Private grocery stores and chains, such as Wal-Mart and McDonald’s, would no longer be allowed to accept EBT cards, and the money loaded on the cards could not be withdrawn and used for any other purpose. Each card would have a set dollar amount sizable enough to purchase essential items from the government store. For example, a family of four could expect to receive enough government-brand beans, rice, bread, milk, cheese, meat, cereal and vegetables to last a month with careful planning. In other words, they must be ready to stretch a food budget. Families with babies would get a month supply of formula, baby food and diapers.
Fourth, anyone who accepts government aid would have to submit to a monthly tobacco and drug test. Food stamp recipients are, after all, wards of the state. They are slaves to the government and should be reminded of that fact. If a recipient is found to have tobacco or drugs in his system, he would be dropped from the program. People on government aid would also lose the privilege of voting. That way they couldn’t vote for greater benefits or easier terms (most of them don’t vote, but now they couldn’t).
...
My reform measures might seem draconian to some (and the antithesis of the free market), but they would hopefully have the desired result of reducing food stamp rolls so we could eventually eliminate the program and let the states handle the issue. Before accepting food stamps, people would have to carefully consider whether they want to face the loss of voting privileges, the humiliation of shopping at government stores and using government food, the inability to smoke or do drugs and the added inconvenience of having to make two or three stops for their groceries should they choose to buy snacks with their own money. Plus, tax producers would no longer have to knowingly be face to face with people at the check-out who are on government assistance but have nicer cell phones and accessories than they do.
There should be humiliation and pain in government assistance. Every time someone accepts food stamps, they are spitting on the principles of independence, and they, not the taxpayers who fund the program, should be reminded of that fact.
[From Ann Coulter's latest book, "Demonic"]
“But more important, abortion clinic violence should not be filed under ‘Political Violence’ at all. It should be filed under ‘Things Liberals Won’t Let Americans Vote On.’—When there is no legal process for pro-lifers to pursue to outlaw abortion – unlike every policy liberals violently protest – some pro-lifers will inevitably respond to lawlessness with lawlessness,” Coulter writes. “In the first few years after [Planned Parenthood v. Casey], about six more people were killed in attacks on abortion clinics. Most of the abortionists were shot or, depending upon your point of view, had a procedure performed on them with a rifle.”
“There were no more constitutional options left to fight judicial tyranny on the little matter of mass murder,” she concludes. “Thus, abortion clinic violence is more akin to the Tiananmen Square protests in Communist China than any liberal riot in America. Want to stop violence at abortion clinics? Repeal Roe and let Americans vote.”
Now back to that communal shower. It’s no secret that men are generally much more susceptible to sexual arousal through visual stimuli than are most women. Many gays will deny that this is the case with them, but why then is the Internet saturated with gay porn? I don’t claim to be a Constitutional law scholar on a par with President Obama, but shouldn’t the overwhelmingly straight warriors who answer their county’s call be spared the indignity of showering with other men who achieve lascivious enjoyment from the sight of those lithe naked bodies, and who may be tempted to seek more than the view? They are, after all, guys. If a Constitutional right to privacy that guarantees access to abortionists can be summoned from thin air, certainly the prohibition against involuntary servitude should prevent unwilling heterosexual men from providing beefcake parades without their informed consent, at least penumbrally.
In the real world, being openly gay in the military can, and will, result in some of these folks getting their throats slit while on night ops by some real crazy military types. If you’re that bent on pushing your lifestyle choice in everybody’s face, the military isn’t the place to do it. But, go ahead and reap the results. You can’t complain when you’re dead.