I'd suggest to anyone who is having trouble separating the wheat from the chaff when it comes to the various spins on NS and Hitler to do what I am doing research it themselves. To many people with to many opinions on NS especially and they don't really know anything about that aspect of this movement. Instead of listening to the multifarious keyboard commentators on sites that do not necessarily focus on that particular ideology I'm going straight to the source the NSist. Just like I came here to check out what SF was about instead of taking the ADLs or the SPLCs take on it.

Sure your going to get slightly different flavors out there, but as long as the core ideology is the same one can build a decent understanding of what's what and who's who. I don't take as fact the opinions of persons who FEEL so strongly about their opinion, regardless of their sources, that they are affected when people don't take what THEY have to say as the be all end all on any subject. In the treatment field we call that Compromised Objectivity.

As to Hitler.... Well he WAS right about one thing, The jew! As for the rest... History is written by the victor, and the reality is he was not the victor, so another wrote the history the way they wrote it. Another biased opinion that surely DID NOT include ALL the facts and nuances that could lead to a more complete understanding of the whole truth.

People with half ass information make half ass decisions, and that is how it is most often when emotions become involved.

So I don't know how to answer your poll question at this time, because I only half ass understand the decision it requires me to make