(Submitter’s note: this is in response to an article with the headline: “California to spend $28M to help arriving asylum-seekers”)
If blue states would stop wasting taxpayer dollars providing lavish lifestyles to illegal aliens, they wouldn’t need bailouts from the federal government.
No more money should go to states who spend our hard-earned cash on non-citizens.
13 comments
As usual, stupid bimbo talks out of her ass about things she knows nothing about.
Isn’t CO a blue state, despite her? She’s a huge red puddle of vomit on a spotless white carpet.
If states would stop tasting wax payer dollars providing lavished lifestyles to illegal blue aliens, they shouldn’t need bailouts from the feral government.
No more money would go to states who spend our card-earned hash on non-citizens.
@Creativerealms #80145
Well, yeah, according to these fundies, having a roof and food is a lavish lifestyle. Remember the guy who complained poor people are poor because they waste their money on food and rent?
First, they aren’t illegals but asylum-seekers, able to stay in the USA until their asylum claims have been examinated, and liable to be deported if their claims are refused. The only point which might be relevant is that these asylim-seekers are under Federal responsability.
What did more harm to California’s treasury was Proposition 13, and all ensuing legislation, as described in the infortunately defunct blog of David Smith of the AHI.
@Lucilius #80159
I can get behind that. So long, Texas! So long, Mississippi! So long, Alabama! May your trailer parks never be overrun by meth junkies or be foreclosed upon by real estate companies located up north in blue states. May your Klan activities keep you busy, may your BBQs keep you fat, & may your citizens murder each other while attempting to own the libtards.
Oh yeah, I’m sure they put them up in the Long Beach Hilton (paint-blistering sarcasm). However, Gun Moll, it is a lot better than putting children in cages.
California gives more to the Federal government than it gets back. They're probably using their own money for this.
@The_Crimson_Ghost #80138
Colorado has a lot of rural areas but the majority of people live in blue areas. Her district is one of those rural areas so it's red. We do have crazies here like the guy who refused to bake a cake for a gay couple in Lakewood.
@Chloe #80206
That lines up with what I’ve read.
I really don’t like painting either entire states or people who are in rural areas with the broad red brush, but the idiots these days give you no choice, especially when they elect Plague Rats like Lauren to office. I’m still hoping that since she’s absolutely useless, even the dumbfucks that voted for her will toss her outta office next year, leaving her free to eat the grass on her front yard & enjoy whatever activities the mentally impaired like her do.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
