(just for context, I used to watch nancysauria back in the day, I mostly followed her for her art tutorials but her miraculous ladybug content got too annoying for me and I stopped paying attention to her, but I forgot to unsubscribe from her channel and one day the video titled "NO TO LGBT IN CHILDRENS SHOW" was recommended to me, so I decided to quote about her and the two guests here, I’m going to leave timestamps and try translasting some of their most repugnant claims.)

NancySauria: why am I doing this video? parents, you will see that on July 23 it was released the chapter reverser of ladybug in which it was included a very special character as it is a caricature of a country that doesn’t respect the thinking of others but it already imposes their gender ideology agenda to the day, I would not be surprised if they started to deepen these characters that they include in the name of bad liberty and is not only ladybug there are already programs that are extremely direct with the kids, they are not subtle, those victimists will not be happy until they appear in the jam of the babies lest that jam incites babies to hatred, I say this because these people who create these cartoons are interested in selling and this topic is in fashion, they are not interested in what information they give to your child if you consider that your son is too young to receive this type of content, these people do not create entertainment for children who are entertaining themselves with children so be careful with these invasive contents, that allows them to see your children enter this ideology in programs for children that directly intervenes with their identity and the child's conscience until they now perceive the world and doubt that their first reality will only make them insecure and will harm their ability to analyze their environment objectively, this confusion that did not exist prior to the ideology of transsexualism brought by Magnus Hirschfeld in the 20th century can also cause children to be involved in illicit and dangerous situations, both because of the way they can be exposed and because of the idea of ​​being hormonally altered, practice that practice that has led nearly half of its practitioners to suicide, although it can be argued that promoting homosexuality in childhood cartoons is not equivalent to promoting transsexualism and hormone abuse if it can be argued that these content creators are involved with lgbt organizations, which are related to these practices, all this decline in standardization inevitably leads to the rethinking and questioning of values in normalization inevitably leads to the rethinking and questioning of of pre-established values due to a slippery slope effect.

Oveja: I will always answer that their orientation was never an important part of the story, they were never persecuted for discrimination or their acceptance in society was seen explicitly only because of their sexuality, they were part of a cast that tried to show reality and their orientation was not part of their character, If you are one of those who wants to demonstrate a shameless progressive political vision in terms of cartoons is because you would be against seeing the negative side of them, because it always has to be the positive side, they would not be willing to see an episode of a children's series to treat this topic as objectively as possible and let the children think about what they want to think about it? of course not because it would go against their progressive narrative, right?

doomentio: When a person is against pro-homosexual positions, the first thing they look at as a kind of ad hominen is their religion, well, in my case I am not a Christian or a Muslim, my position is influenced by social studies and scientific as well as historical, it is not a big problem that homosexuals exist, after all they are a very small world minority the problem is when it is promoted and normalized ignoring thousands of tests that highlight its psychological and health damage in the population.