Caribbia #racist #conspiracy #elitist #wingnut

Caribbia #racist #conspiracy #elitist #wingnut forum.nationstates.net

Three things.
1. 1994 was not a free and fair election, as about 70% of the country suddenly became legally permitted to vote, which completely 180ed the political landscape of the country and the blacks united - and now we have a government in South Africa that is simply anti-white. The ANC being elected in 1994 can be compared to the formative years of apartheid - one ethnic group uniting against the other.
2. Minneapolis is fine. I don't mind the racial mix, as long as everyone is legal, it's great to celebrate and share different cultures! Especially when there are no race laws that would restrict white Minnesotans from pretty much everything in one way or another :)
3. I am NOT okay with brutalizing people solely because of their race, accent, or both. Remember, people with foreign accents and/or of a foreign race CAN be legal!

8 comments

Number 2 proves that he is gullible, not knowing (like stormfront-ers).

Don’t like how things are for certain shites… er, I mean ‘whites’ in certain parts of the US, you’re free to join Elongated Muskrat in going to South Africa, OP.

America: love it or leave it.

“1. 1994 was not a free and fair election, as about 70% of the country suddenly became legally permitted to vote, which completely 180ed the political landscape of the country and the blacks united”
Expand on this, please. How is this NOT a free and fair election?
Legal voters voted and things changed.
Sounds a lot more fair than 30% of the population controlling the elections.

“and now we have a government in South Africa that is simply anti-white.”
Ideally, the nation should be fairer to everyone, yes. Unfortunately it includes humans. So consequences and retribution are to be expected. Gosh. Darn. Shucks.

“The ANC being elected in 1994 can be compared to the formative years of apartheid - one ethnic group uniting against the other.”
Okay.
But the whites united against blacks without having been victims of the blacks. They were just racist for racism sake. As opposed to being racist in reaction to some pretty solid racism.
So, not quite comparable, is it?

Re: #1: So, basically, subjugated peoples gained the right to vote, and they voted not to be subjugated, with all the consequences that entails, and you’re whining that this was too big of a change, too fast. Sorry, I can’t be too sympathetic about that.

3. I am NOT okay with brutalizing people solely because of their race, accent, or both. Remember, people with foreign accents and/or of a foreign race CAN be legal!

So, that means that he or she is just fine with illegal immigrants being “brutalized”?

1. 1994 was not a free and fair election, as about 70% of the country suddenly became legally permitted to vote

It was still fairer than the previous elections which enfranchised only 30% of the population.

Caribbia: “In the 1994 election, the about 70% of the country who didn’t have the vote before now had the vote! And they voted to promote THEIR interests, not the interests of the other 30%, which includes ME!! That means it wasn’t a free and fair election!!!”

How the fuck was it not “far and free” to have the rest of the population voting at all??? Don’t you try and bullshit us you’re not a racist shithead after making that statement

Caribbia #racist #conspiracy #elitist #wingnut forum.nationstates.net

8 comments

Confused?