“Until sodomite marriage was enacted to be a weapon against our freedom, I'm not aware of any laws forcing anyone to support heterosexual marriage.”
Anti-discrimination laws.
Imagine that a Catholic Doctor wouldn’t let a wife visit her husband in the ICU because their marriage was in a Baptist ceremony, not Catholic. He’d be sued, right? And he’d lose.
Imagine that an employer offered insurance that carried their employees spouses, but didn’t cover anyone married by a Justice of the Peace, because that wasn’t a Church Sacrament. Lawsuit. And they employer would lose.
Imagine a school allowed Moms to pick their kids up after school, and allowed their dads, IF they were married by Christain ceremony, not Muslim, or Hindu, or anything in Vegas. Lawsuit, loss.
“If a sodomite doesn't want to support heterosexual marriage, that should be its right.”
Right, right, let one florist NOT deliver flowers to a Christain wedding because Christains don’t support his wedding. Lawsuit. Immediate.
“But, the two are not equal.”
Sure they are.
“Heterosexual relations perpetuates the human race,”
Not all of them do. If this is the basis of your freedom, then you can’t support any couple practicing birth control or who are infertile.
“ and heterosexual marriage does it with the lowest socioeconomic cost.”
Huh?
“Sodomite marriage has no value, and by nature is immoral.”
Samesex marriage provides plenty of value, such as medical proxy, child adoption, insurance benefits, legal power of attorney. Pretty much every single agency, business, or government policy that uses the term ‘spouse’ would have to recognize the couple.
