Spacewyrm

want to remove significant distinctions between how men and women dress [...] even though many feminists also want women to dress immodestly.

No. Feminists just want to not have moral busybodies like you telling women what we can and can't wear. Personally, I actually prefer wearing a skirt to wearing pants.

do not want gender equality; they want power for the female Left
in movies and television, portray the men, in particular, the white heterosexual men, as inherently evil, dumb or incompetent, and the women, in particular those that adhere to the feminist agenda, as inherently good, smart or competent (note that this conflicts with gender equality).

OMG. *Some* male characters in TV are dumb or evil! How terrible! Jeez, you are such a sensitive little baby. How about all the male characters who are smart and good and competent? They don't count just because there are some who aren't? Or, is it just that you only watch stupid sitcoms that derive their humor from characters who are lazy stereotypes rather than fleshed out people?

on that note, some movies and television programs, in addition to depicting men as inherently evil, dumb, or incompetent, can sometimes depict women who adhere to more traditional femininity, including promoting traditional family values and traditional marriage (see below), as well as expressing more traditional gender roles and natures, in an extremely demeaning manner, usually implying that they are at best brainless bimbos and at worst gold-diggers (women who only marry someone for their wealth), often with the implication that traditional femininity is considered inherently bad (which goes against the concept of women having free choices regarding how to pursue their life).

Yeah, and just ignore all the sweet grandmas, housewife mothers, and such who are all over the place in TV, I guess. Oh, but she probably doesn't count if at any point said anything "feminist" right? Which to you probably means anything implying that there's something important other than a man in her life.

conveniently pretend that there are no meaningful differences between men and women when that advances liberal causes (e.g., women and men equally in military combat, to weaken the U.S. military), but reject equality when that results in more money to women (e.g., VAWA funding of women's groups).

What about how assholes like you try to pretend that real differences between women and men are much more distinct than they really are? Statistical differences are real, but there's a lot of overlap so instead of barring women from the military, a reasonable approach is to have set standards for joining, and let in people regardless of gender who meet them. Most men would lose a fight against the strongest women you know.

I don't even know what that money thing is referring to and I'm too lazy to look it up right now.

oppose chivalry and even feign insult at harmless displays of it (see battle between the sexes).

Because guys being "chivalrous" can be really obnoxious sometimes. I know you can't understand why, or else you wouldn't have written any of this.

view traditional marriage as unacceptably "patriarchal".
belittle and mock other women who desire to have children or raise a family

*Some* people think of marriage in that way, sure. Not all feminists do though. Personally, I'd like to have a husband someday. But no kids (even though I kinda wish I *could* get pregnant if I wanted to...)

shirk traditional gender activities, like baking.

Feminists just don't want women to be forced to bake if they don't want to. I love baking. I also love being able to decide for myself what stuff I do.

support affirmative action for women

So?

advocate for women in combat in the military just like men, and coed submarines.

Care to explain why that's a bad thing? (also, you covered this already)

refuse to take her husband's last name when marrying.

Not all feminists feel that way. But what difference does it make if some people follow different naming customs. Personally, I probably will take my husband's name when I marry, but only because my current last name is kinda boring (and besides, it's what my mom and sister did)

believe marriage implies "female servitude" when it is in fact a mutual bond.

You're repeating yourself (again)

distort historical focus onto female figures, often overshadowing important events (E.g.: Henry VIII's wives take precedence in common knowledge to his actual reign.)

By distort historical focus, you mean "pay any attention at all to a woman who did something important". And Henry VIII's marriages were relatively important to history actually...

often condemn the God-given order of gender roles, as laid out in the Holy Bible.

Because they suck.

object to being addressed as "ma'am," or feminine nicknames such as "sweetheart" or "honey";

Yeah, I don't want guys calling me sweetheart, honey, or baby unless they're my boyfriend. It's demeaning. I don't mind ma'am. I think I'd like to be called "miss" but most people who don't know me unfortunately still tend to address me as "sir"...

object to other female-only names, such as "temptress".

"Temptress" is the example that popped in your head. Good Glob.

take offense at grammatical rules of the English language, like using the pronoun "he" when referring to a hypothetical/anonymous person, or phrases like 'fireman' and 'stewardess.'

Grammatical rules aren't set in stone. So why shouldn't we change these rule? Actually, hate to break it to you (not really), but these rules have already largely been changed already.

support the homosexual agenda.

Oh no! Anything but that!! *rolls eyes*

push propaganda that implies that women weren't allowed to be granted an education until the 1960s, and all education beforehand was granted solely to "rich white males."

Eh, this one's just a straight-up lie. But the view ciriticized here isn't too far off from the truth...

demands that women choose a career over raising children without any remorse.

Demands that women be allowed to choose whether to have a career or raise children (or both). Remorse? For what?

criticize music such as heavy metal, rock and roll, and country for being "sexist".

It often is.

object to anyone describing Northern and Western European women being demure or Southern and Eastern European women as seductive.

That's less about being a feminist and more about not being a racist...

Denounce and demean any women who have more feminine traits and embrace their femininity.

I do suppose that women who conform too closely to traditional feminine gender roles are criticized by some feminists, but that's not the same as being against femininity. Actally, feminists are perfectly fine with feminine traits and femininity. We just objects to assholes like you who try to make the range of traits considered feminine cartoonishly narrow. If I become a greasy auto mechanic, I'm going to be a *feminine* greasy auto mechanic, thank you very much.

Some feminists want to do away with masculinity.

If so, very few. Personally, I like masculinity. I just prefer men who don't think masculinity means being an overbearing sexist asshole who treats women like babies.