All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
(purpplerainn)
Notice how they think we were getting upset about the guy being hot with a hot gf when we were actually getting upset that we wouldn't never have anyone wake us up in the morning with kisses. Just goes to show the blackpill is real and IT only knows how to attack strawmans.
Seriously IT dedicated a sub to hate on the idea of incels that they fucking created lol, r/braincels is simply built on the idea that if your born unattractive your struggle in life is going to be greater than someone born attractive, less than 10% of this sub would advocate rape and murder, NO ONE HERE ACTUALLY BELIEVES WE ARE ENTITLED TO SEX, the members that hate women started doing so after coming here and seeing the facts (even then a lot of us still don’t hate them), not the contrary as they would love to have you believe. My chad/chadlite friends talked openly all throughout school about how women are inferior to men, they don’t deserve equal rights, they don’t deserve respect, feminism is a joke, all woman are stupid, said schooling them is a waste of money and they should stay at home to cook and clean, but they all have relationships or constant hook ups because of their looks. They were all fucking racist too. We simply use this sub to cope and pass the time because society has rejected us, but they can’t even let us have that.
(blastinum)
Imagine being told by your parents that you can do anything you set your mind to, then you find out a decent number of people are homeless/in poverty. You tell yourself “it’s their fault” and start attributing negative qualities to them because the idea that you could just as easily be in their shoes scares you. Poor people are now “drug addicts” and “bad with money” or “lazy”. Similarly, we (incels) become anything that it takes for normies to reject the idea that the world isn’t fair or forgiving. Putting us down is their cope.
(JustLetTheWorldBurn)
Fucking hell this says it all about privileged KIDS living in the protective bubble their mommies and daddies built for them. They've never met anyone who has it bad and if they did, they wouldn't associate with them because it might pop that bubble and GASP, prove them wrong.
Fags in hell: "AAAAUGH! HELP ME! I MADE A MISTAKE BY CHOOSING THE FAG LIFESTYLE! I'M IN PAAAIN!!! AAAAUGH!!! SOMEONE HELP ME! THIS CANT LAST FOREVER!!! AAAAAAAUUGH! IT BURNS!!!!! AAAAUGH!"
14 y/o Chad made his hot teacher pay for his acne meds for the privilege of sucking his cock
She got 10 years in prison.
I'm honestly surprised.
Allright Im gonna be 100% honest here and say it: she doesn't deserve them. That boy was having the time of his life, getting to skip classes and fuck his teacher, AND getting gifts.
The article says she "stole the child's innocence" LMAO I was already watching porn at 10 and masturbating at 12. My great grandfather was 14 when he had his first child with his wife. People today are wildly underestimating when childhood ends. 14 yr olds are absolutely mature enough to have sex .
The old "he obviously liked it so what if the law says it is rape" defense. She broke the law. Simple as that. You let a male teacher do this to a female student and there would be nothing but outrage. Male student gets diddled and it is no big deal.
I can already see the IT screenshot coming but I wouldn't mind the reverse situation at all (male teacher with 14yo girl). Most 14yo girls can be very sexual and even predatory, especially if the teacher is chad.
Yh ofc she broke the law, what I am saying is that this law severely overestimates the age when people are ready for sex.
In my perfect world tho, there would be a push for monogamy so no sexual relations unless you are willing to publicly commit to one person.
It is storming here. Snow, rain, thunder. Hail. I just dropped a potato. Then it was gone. I panicked. Later I found it a place where I could not possibly have dropped it. What is going on? Are we being manipulated by computers?
(((Climate change))) is a made up problem designed to guilt trip Whites into letting thi. Does the climate change? Of course it does, over the course of millions of years. Is the climate changing so rapidly to the point where it's gonna kill us? No. I believe it is being used to make Whites feel bad for "screwing up" the environment. Ever notice how they ever focuses on China and India, which are the biggest polluters in the world, yet constantly beat Europe and America to death, despite being relatively clean? All in all it's just a bullshit narrative designed to further white guilt and garner sympathy for third worlders, as well as getting (((them))) more shekels through "carbon taxes" and such.
Additionally, (((they're))) preparing us for a massive "Climate migration" (it might be happening right now), by getting us to feel bad for making their homes uninhabitable and letting third worlders into our countries because of it. Of course we all know what massive migration from the third world means.
That's not to say that protecting the environment isn't important, but crippling your economy and letting billions of Africans into your country over a false narrative probably isn't a good idea.
The free abandoned acceptance of hafus is the acceptance of WMAF.
Which is preferable, discrimination of hafus, or a WMAF/BMAF wasteland? The day I have to lock my bike to a fence because of the arrival of undesirables is the day Japan's legacy dies.
It's not an exaggeration to say that the future of the nation, and the survival of a culture that has lasted millennia will be decided in the next 50 years.
Choose wisely.
try this pickup line currycels
Hi. As a woman who’s constantly trying to understand the incel mindset, why isn’t the Indian man going for Indian women? Why Caucasian women? Thanks.
Because the curry whores are becoming just like the asian whores, only going for white chad. This leaves currycels and ricecels with no one left
Okay, but what about Indian/Asian women who aren’t whores?
Non existant. We live in a society with white people everywhere. These women are always going to choose the white man instead of their own race. The only reason you see asians with asians or indians with indians is because they were unable to get a white man because most white men are able to get other white women. The ones who don't resort to brown or asian girls, leaving almost no white incels. Whitecel is volcel unless you're gigamanlet, literally deformed, or gigamentalcel. I see sub5'8 fat neckbeard white men with asian foids all the time. A lot of white guys I know also claim they get attention from these asian or curry foids a lot. Now, if these women would choose a lower tier white guy rather than a higher tier brown or asian dude, where does that leave us, the lower tier ethnics? Inceldom
Okay, so does that mean that inceldom is a product of American society? I ask because although I’m fat, I have a few Indian female friends (I live in the UK) who have only dated/married Indian men. One of my Indian friends is fairly attractive (I’d rate her 7/10) and she’s dating a short, balding guy. He’s Indian. She loves him because he’s awesome to her. Another friend is Caucasian actually, she married her Indian boyfriend last year. He’s not ugly but not spectacularly attractive either. Balding a bit and shorter than she is, I’d rate him 6/10 and her 8/10. They went to uni together and have similar incomes. So forgive me if I’m not quite seeing your point here. And thanks for responding.
As debunked on this sub many times, exceptions are not the rule. "I've seen -x happen irl therefore x is not a real problem". Statistics show that Indian and Asian men are among the lowest rated in attractiveness. Most of these issues stem from the ideals of the west being enforced onto ethnics. The whole "White Beauty"ideal and skin whitening craze among asians and indians contributes to this problem. Indian men are just as guilty of this. They chase white women a lot, especially the FOBs. The only difference is they usually aren't able to get with them, while the Indian women are able to (or at least have a higher chance to because they are women and there are no shortages of desperate white men). Combine this with hypergamous western society, and as a result you get this. Want proof? Go to r/uwaterloo. This is a subreddit for a Canadian university which is overwhelmingly Asian. Every other thread is someone complaining about how they are miserable and lonely
I look around me, and I see my family, my people. I live in a white pocket in the Midwest United States. I love this. I love these people. I don't ever want this to change, indeed, I want it to spread. But that isn't going to just... happen. We've all just sat idly by waiting for non-whites to adopt our way of living, not realizing that they just don't want to. The supreme arrogance of the western man was his assumption that the rewards he has reaped for himself can be shared with those who did not earn it. Freedom, the Republic, Westernism, our very way of life. But they don't want it. Arabs don't want a Secular Republic; that's why they always replace them with Theocratic Dictatorships. Africans can't handle the nation-state; that's why there's always famines and war. The European fails to see that the world not only doesn't want his values, but also wants him dead. To us who recognize this arrogance, it seems hopeless.
But it isn't. The European is the one who tamed the world. The Spaniard discovered a New World and spread their language and customs to all of South and Central America, and even parts of Asia. The Frenchmen revolted against an oppressive regime that used God as an excuse to oppress its own people. The Anglo-Saxon tamed the whole damn world in a never-ending quest for domination. The German fought against adversity from all sides to finally unite into a single state. The Italian helped to build the "west" as we know it, first with the Roman Empire, then as a hub of Christian influence. The Greek also helped to created this all, to establish the ideals of the west, and fought hard against foreign oppressors to regain freedom for their people. The Slav has made impressive conquests eastward and has endured centuries of misrule, either from genocidal Germans or Turks, (((Communists))), or just plain corrupt dictators, and has emerged with a staunch will to never falter again. The Magyar has not always been a European, but has joined the ranks through quality of character and ready embracement of everything that makes the west, "the west." The Norseman has struggled through adversity, and may well falter in times coming, but has always emerged strong, even against its all-conquering neighbors.
So, back to my first statement, about how I have to find faith in something other than God. After seeing our history, and how we compare to others, I can only come to the conclusion that the only thing I can put my faith in is, truly, the Iron Will of the European. Hard times are coming, but, as always, we will emerge victorious. I can only hope that, this time, we don't long to share our victory.
Hulk Hogan, brothers. May the European and the West never be broken.
I don't trust all men on one basis: male socialization, which applies to all of them. To differing degrees and in different ways, sure, but still. Male socialization teaches them to look to women as inferior, as servile, as the ones to blame for their own actions toward them, as fleshy sex toys for their benefit, to be predators of women, to get the most they can for themselves short of it being unacceptable, to be blind to suffering in favor of "rational" principle, to be complicit and overlook the brutality and arrogance of their own group.
Then, it even goes as far as to have them suppress and shame their own emotions, so that they will remain effective as oppressors who will refrain from turning against their own group, who tends to even be shitty to them. No, he's not really a nice guy if he watches porn, and absolutely so if he is protective of his porn habits. If your boyfriend only considers the problem of it to be how its technically cheating to him, he either hasn't realized or doesn't care about the real problem of it.
I can only come to start trying to trust men who hate men themselves, which of course comes down to what the cult of masculinity demanded he himself become. However, even they have to be questioned on whether they are actual traitors to men or if they are simply that cunning to win your trust to then betray you personally. After all, the abusers who get the farthest are those who did the most in their power to avoid being recognized as one.
(pobox1880)
Fed Up TIF
I think I hit peak trans when I saw someone say that TIMs should be allowed to feel uncomfortable around and avoid TIFs but the other way around is "transmisogyny". How are we any kind of threat to them? Why should they be allowed to avoid us but we can't do the same when we feel uncomfortable with them?
I have severe body dysphoria that I struggle with every day but I am sick and tired of people coddling TIMs who tower over me in size and strength and could probably snap my neck. I also disagree with the idea that there's no such a thing as female or male socialization. Obviously people who were raised a certain way will think that way. It's not rocket science. I know that I was raised to be a perfect daughter and fed every line in the book about how to act and behave long before I came to identify as trans. It's bullsh*t.
I'm just fed up. :/ Sorry if this comes across as stupid or something. I just needed a place to vent without being fed to the wolves.
(stellarmoth)
I used to babysit frequently and ever since I learned about female and male socialization I'd see it absolutely everywhere, even from the most "progressive" of families. The most obvious example being a girl whose parents held her behavior to a much higher standard than her brother's, who was free to be loud and roughhouse much of the time.
A lot of trans seem to believe that TIMs should be in female prisons, if only for their own safety (nevermind that of real women, who don't matter apparently). Ask them if they think TIFs belong in male prisons and that's when they suddenly realize that women are put in danger by the opposite sex, regardless of gender identity. That is not to say that I think TIMs are safe in male spaces, but rather that they can't identify out of the threat they pose to women any more than a TIF can identify out of sex based oppression.
It's a really obvious double standard.
I'm sorry things are tough for you right now and I hope you have a better day soon.
My friend is a 1st grade teacher and assigned her students to write down some lyrics to their favorite song...
Seriously all the pandemic that niggers are in this world and you find this funny and surprising. It is not racism when these fucking pieces of trash go out of their way to perpetuate every stereotype in existence.
The transgender community preys on young, confused people and makes them into their minions and martyrs by giving them a false sense of belonging in their demented, sexist “community”. The transgender community is based on the premise of sexism, and that men and women are inherently different psychologically, but for some reason, genetics, and what actually makes men, men, and women, women, doesn’t exist. To them, wearing makeup and having long hair makes you female, while liking Tonka trucks and cargo shorts makes you male.
They try to discredit real women in every single way while becoming pornified walking sex dolls for their own fetish, and still look like what they really are, men! And then claim if you don’t want their fetish forced into women’s spaces, that you’re privileged and sexist! They prey on impressionable youngsters, giving them life threatening body altering modifications (like chest binders) for free through their “no profit” organizations to cure “dysphoria” of youth not allowed to get these body altering modifications by the sound logic and health concerns of their parents.
They groom children because all they want is their agenda to be furthered. They lie about dangerous treatments having little to no negative effects, like Lupron (that can stunt brain development, give your osteoporosis in your 20s, etc). They glorify mental illness, and exploiting the system to further their own selfish gain while painting themselves as perfect. Sorry, just had to get this off my chest.
[OP of thread "WE WILL NEVER FORGET 9-11-18 ~ The Night of The Long Noses"]
Picture depting the World Trade Center where each building is named after subreddits baned for hate speech, such as ChadRight and BillionShekelSupreme.
Shades of (white) privilege: a sociologist compares the experiences of Swedish female expats in America and Singapore
(Jorggo)
We know this already but it helps to have it written in paper for people who still deny white privilege doesn't exist.
Also, something I found problematic in the article highlights one of the key issues that relates to WMAF/dating.
The article states that Swedish women didn't enjoy a premium for their whiteness in Singapore like they did in America and were considered to be below Chinese women. This tells me that Asian men in Singapore don't put white women above Asian women. That seems to be reciprocated by the Swedish women as well. "They showed the least bit interest in the Asian men and in fact they felt less feminine".
However, the opposite was true for the Swedish men and the Chinese women. It's interesting that even when unintended, the issue of WMAF still manages to pop its head in.
White women seem to feel more masculine in Asia and I feel this may also translate to them feeling more masculine around Asian men because they see how "feminine" Asian women are so of course it's only plausible for them to think that they're more masculine in comparison.
I always thought it was weird whenever I saw white women in Asia, they would 9.9/10 be with white men but not the same for the white men. Granted I couldn't verbalize it at the time but it still made a disconnect in my brain.
I don't really have a point to make here just that I never took into account that XFs may be dissuaded from pursuing AMs because they feel more masculine which probably makes our already dire situation worse.
(ferdyberdy)
I could never date white women. I found the few that I associated and went out with to be very indulgent, impractical, only had short term goals and almost always gave in to their emotions.
Yes which is what caused you to make the broad conclusion you led with. It’s a bit hypocritical to do that when we experience the same broad brushing.
What broad strokes/conclusion mate? I referred everything to specifically "the few that I associated and went out with" and because of that "I could never date white women" <- is that the broad conclusion? that I do not find white women suitable partners?
I'm not going to be dishonest and say I'm ready to try my luck and put up with one more just for internet points.
Here is another broad brushstroke for you. Also, as an Asian can you really honestly say that you find marrying into white culture appealing?
I am married to an Aussie. She and her family is awesome. No gender race or culture is monolithic. Just as I wouldn’t want to be prejudged for my race or culture I don’t do it to others.
Is it prejudice just because I have chosen to make a practical decision on this?
The cultural differences are well documented. I'm not from China but I just put it there because the scores were similar to my country (at least in comparison to Australia).
https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison/australia,china/
I prefer to marry into a culture that has more long term orientation/planning and less indulgent. Perhaps those traits are awesome (pretty subjective word by the way) to you, but it is not to me.
If its prejudgement to avoid wasting my time by gearing my dating preferences towards a partner and a culture that is more likely to yield qualites that I seek in a partner then guilty as charged.
I never said it applied to all white girle by the way. Just enough to warrant me moving on to avoid wasting my time.
(Your gonna get downvoted becuase alot of chan lurkers around here worship the ground mayo girls walk on.)
I do not blame them if they find such traits attractive. Someone has to at the end of the day and there is a reason why it perpetuates in culture.
I'm not particularly wealthy so I do not have the funds or the time to try my luck with girls who are less likely to value long term stability over immediate gratification. No amount of political correctness will change how frequent each trait is found in either culture.
An interesting insight into white social signalling.
It appears that all they are after is still only validation and relevance. Self-actualization has no value of no one knows about it. Any altruistic endeavours (feminism for example) they appear to support seems just be an effort to fulfil that need for validation and acknowledgement.
(TehInternets)
To most whites "self actualization" is a byword that means travel and taking pictures in 3rd world locations, showing off their minority "friends" or taking part in safe, prescribed activities carefully curated to look prestigious. Contrary to popular belief whites are neither adventurous, free thinking nor individualistic.
None of these activities have anything to do with the "self". White culture is not about feeling but pretending.
The ideal is light-skin but not pink-skin.
Pretty easy to see why white women in Asia do badly. They age faster, they are less feminine, less thin, they are excessively narcissistic and have a superiority complex which I really think is just penis-envy. Blonde nordic women are seen to represent the apex of these traits so they are largely ignored by men.
I'm a woman and I'm sliding further right every day.
I was raised in California by a very liberal mother. I was force fed feminism in the 9th grade by a very pushy feminist teacher. I was a Bernie supporter in 2016.
There were several factors that brought me to the right. The first couple were when BLM interrupted Bernie's speech. I saw how weak willed he was and thought to myself "how is this man going to handle adversaries on a global scale when he cowers immediately to the demands of a couple young black women?"
The next was when Gloria Allred insisted that women who do not vote for Hillary are betraying fellow women. She was pushing groupthink - herd mentality that immediately infuriated me. I knew something fishy was going one.
The biggest unfurling of my liberal ideals were the DNC hacks. I read email after email. I saw the immoral consolidation of power against Bernie Sanders and by the end of it I could no longer belong to the DNC. Having a basic understanding of OPSEC, how the internet works, and computers I never once believed in the Muh Russia narrative. It was a leak, not a hack.
The Women's March completely ridded me of my Feminist brain cancer. These adults were throwing child like temper tantrums for absolutely no reason. They looked absolutely retarded in their pussy hats, and everything was very cringe. I just couldn't anymore.
After that, I started to evaluate the type of information I've fallen for my whole life. I started looking into alternative political stances. Just like everyone else I started with the light stuff - Sargon of Akkad, Jordan B Peterson, Steven Crowder and Paul Joseph Watson. But it wasn't enough. They were able to comment on the symptoms of a sick society, but never looked in depth towards the cause. Peterson hinted at it, with Postmodernism and Marxist idealogies being wide spread through out Western Society. But not far enough and I wanted answers.
I tried to avoid the JQ. Really did. But everything always led back to it. I watched the documentary this sub talked about - Defamation. After that the redpill was swallowed and I could no longer go back. I'm currently reading Culture of Critique and all of the sources are sound from what I've found.
I want my people to survive. I want Western Culture to flourish and not die out. We all know there's a decline to the Western World, and I personally think that without it the world will be a darker place. I don't want my future children to be handed such a world.
Some background info: My political ideology has radically shifted since 2016. I used to be a feminist and was a Bernie supporter before Trumps election. Everything started coming into question after after the DNC leaks. I have some knowledge about IA and networking, so it was impossible for me to buy into the Russia narrative. After the Pussy Hat marches after the election, I found that I could no longer call myself a feminist either because the behavior was appalling and I didn't think Trump warranted any of the hatred he was receiving. Fell into the Alt-lite Sargon/Peterson club, and continuously dug until redpilled on the JQ and essentially went full 1488. I don't even think women should be allowed to vote anymore.
My husband has always been a Moderate Republican. He's a great guy, really smart, but he's also very forgiving of people and is the type that just wants to get along. I've been trying to redpill him on various topics - he was receptive of the JQ but seems tired of my jokes. He's definitely more of a Civic Nationalist, and we've had long discussions on Race and IQ and why some cultures are worse than others due to IQ and evolution.
He doesn't buy that IQ is a proper measure of intelligence since culture can influence the outcome of the tests. He still thinks economics are at play when it comes to black vs white violent crime and poverty. He seems to not care very much if humanity becomes a mixed amorphous race, despite me arguing that the West will be dead, and Western culture erased.
He bought heavily into Peterson's Individualist propaganda and I can't convince him that in dire times collectivism is completely necessary.
I've made some ground on these topics but not nearly enough. I don't have enough resources to back up my arguments as I tend to forget to save the studies I stumble upon.
More background: My husband has a really sweet Black Aunt who treated him kindly during a really hard time in his life when nobody else would. He also has mixed cousins. I too really like his aunt, but I'm trying to get across averages of populations and their behaviors don't reflect her own (she genuinely acts really white).
I'm here to ask about what more I can say to convince him that Individualism is only feasible during times of peace and that we need to Collectivize during times of strife. Any resources on Race Realism would be incredibly valuable as well.
LOL no surprise. Women have no morals and can't follow rules clearly without 'emotions' getting in the way. Women infantry = weaker military
[Why do you like the USSR?]
They threw off the shackles of brutal feudalist oppression and life expectancy skyrocketed, infant mortality plummeted, industrialization and socialization caused their economy to grow at historically unprecedented levels, they produced tanks that defeated the Third Reich at a rate that astounded Hitler (we know this because the only recording we have of Hitler outside of public speeches was surreptitiously recorded in a meeting wherein he expressed this astonishment to his aides), they had the first satellite in space, the first telemetry to and from space, the first animal in space, the first man in space, the first woman in space, the first human to complete an orbit of the Earth, and the first space station.
I could go on. The USSR was really cool.
IncelTears Incel mod loses hope.
@transcription
I get rejected like 10 times a month. It's called "dating."
This is a pretty classic cognitive distortion. What the other person says is, "I am not attracted to you." What they hear is "You are not attractive." It's taking a non-personal thing intensely personally.
I know the classic incel response to this: "When it happens over and over, it's hard not to take personally." Well, I know some absurdly hot people. Like, stupid hot. They get rejected, flaked on, and ghosted constantly. This happens to everyone. You've just found a group of self-defeating people who reinforce the worst/most useless thoughts that pop into your head. You're victimizing yourself.
It’s understandable that some people even when very attractive get rejected from time to time. But 10 times a month is incel level depending on the amount of women he dates. If he’s asking 12 people on a date a month and getting rejected 10 times a month he’s not very good looking in general. If he’s asking 50 a month and being rejected 10 times he’s not very good looking either. If he’s asking 100 a month and getting rejected 10 times that’s understandable - but nobody has the time in their right mind to ask 100 people a month out on a date.
He clearly doesn’t understand dating and using rejection like it’s normal. If you’re hot you’ll get rejected maybe 5 times out of 100 people you ask on a date.
This is coming from experience as I’m a decently attractive person - I’ve never been rejected by a woman (since I turned 18, and probably haven’t been rejected 10 time in my lifetime) but some dates haven’t gone as far as two.
This idiot is tricking his brain with lies like ‘well hot people get flaked on’ yes they do, but not often like he’s making out. Or - he clearly doesn’t know what an attractive man looks like.
Camillo, bonobo alpha male in the DRC, fathered 60% of the babies in his community
(bcat124)
The blackpill literally transcends species. How can anyone not see the obvious conclusion that our current liberal culture on sexuality is leading us exactly to this.
(Parkinmyyard)
Evolutionfuel
Can’t deny that this is at the heart of evolved human sexuality. Only one man is needed to impregnate every woman in the village. Why would any woman want anyone but the most alpha?
(incelicious)
Yeah mud hut level technology is pretty awesome. Fuck going to space and shit. Thank god for low-IQ alphas amirite?
He's not saying it's right he's just explaining how "alpha fucks beta bucks" works which normies deny.
Normies deny it today because they are still mentally living in the Victorian era of M'Lady fedora tipping. They refuse to acknowledge that their feminist horseshit is only making alphafux betabux more of a reality with each passing day. AFBB would have been socially unthinkable a few centuries ago, because that would imply descent into primitive behavior again.
Female sexuality is primitive and unless you shame and control female sexuality, we'll be back in the Stone Age again.
High IQ. Even sociologists have noted that non-mongomous societies are always more primitive and tribal than societies with strict socially enforced mongomy. We will slip back into mud hut tier society of we don't control female sexuality soon.
Correct.
Blue Pill = Bonobo society = Matriarchy = Chad wins every time = Primitive stone age eat and fuck all day while 90% LDAR
Black Pill = Chimp society = Patriarchy = even lower ranked guys get action and it is in the interest of higher ranked guys to make sure lower ranked guys get action = We colonizing space and shit
Here, this completely proves my point that patriarchal Chimp society is far superior while bonobos remain primitive:
Chimps have entered the stone age in tool technology. BONOBOS HAVE NOT.
(Rhinen_Spores)
Wonder why the rest of the bonobo-cels haven't teamed up and revolted against the few in charge.
They usually do.
It's an ongoing game of politics where the betas will band together to overthrow the alpha.
The problem is that once they win, another man becomes the alpha and the cycle starts all over again.
Basically lesser apes spend all their time fighting each other for the distribution of sex,so nothing outside of eating, fucking and fighting gets done.
Hominids used to be like this but differentiate their selves through pair bonding. For modern humans, eventually all the males agreed upon a system of social stratification where every guy can get some woman, while the guy at the top gets slightly more women. This happened around the same time as agriculture.
Once men stopped fighting and competing for access to sex, they had free time and energy to focus on other things, like developing society, technology and religion.
(mittrinilli)
Pair bonding results in civilization, pussy chasing the top 20% results in the collapse of society. Enjoy the decline, it's so over
Incel IT mod doubts the importance of personality, is downvoted by his own forum: episode 3
(Throvvmeawayyy)
would you enjoy being with someone that treats you like shit even though you found them physically attractive?
I dont know, lets ask all the girls who choose to stay in abusive relationships with Chad when they could leave him at any moment if they wanted to. Oh wait, actually lets not since your bullshit argument would just fall apart instantly. Fuck I hate IT
(supermentalcel)
i have said this so many times recently. 60-80% of women in abusive relationships eventually return to their abuser and they return on average 7 times before finally leaving for good. not one person has tried to explain or refute this.
J F L
F
L
(AbysmalDescent)
Or the girls who choose to stay in abusive relationships with Chad-lites who treat them like shit, despite having plenty of other, non-abusive, options ready and willing literally orbiting around them. Or girls who choose to enter into relationships with Chad-lites, specifically because of his abusive/toxic personality("oh, he treats women like shit, he must be high value!").
(JoeMamaSaidWhat)
Like people don't do that all the time... The only reason I stayed with my terrible ex is because she was a super pawg. I just dealt with her bullshit best I could and just tried to smash regularly lol.
(Thestartofending)
Females can only think of this manichean, beyond retarded and simplistic answer "but but would you be with someone who's good looking but with an aaaaawful personality ? " not only good looking men who have awful personality have success with women, but even if it was true that an extremely awful personality repulsed women, that doesn't show that good looks matter less or as much as personality.
Here is a legit comparison :
Someone who is average looking but with an awesome personality. Vs someone who is good looking vs an average/not bad not interresting personality.
And among those two, it's obvious who will attract women.
Going to extremes doesn't prove shit, "well i wouldn't chose chad if he has asperger and is a child rapist" doesn't prove that personality matters as much as look, just that some extremes rare cases of attributes can ruin even the huuuge advantage of looks
blackpills dropped on the front page
(CelderSrolls)
The media always have lied abour women being the empathetic gender. It turned out men is the most honest gender of the 2. Talk about fake news that the media try to spread against men.
They don't have fucking empathy, they don't even feel love.
Men feel love and passion so much stronger than women do. A wife will lie, steal, cheat, abuse, etc to her husband and he will stick around and try to make it work. Even though he should leave, he will stay because he loves this woman. She is his everything. But a woman will dump him the split second a hotter guy smiles her way. It's fucking insane.
I have no doubt women cheat more, just from personal experience and experience of friends (And talking to women)
(hello237878)
Loyalty is a male concept
Not necessarily. Look up the blackpill research on this. Women that are virgins going into marriage overwhelmingly stay loyal, and the marriage lasts both partners lifetime in more than 80% of cases. The more men the woman has been with before marriage, the greater the chance that the marriage ends in failure, to the point where it's basically guaranteed to fail if the woman has had a certain number of partners. Men don't pair bond through sex, but women do, so this makes a lot of sense. The more casual sex a woman has, the more her ability to pair bond gets burned out... So, if you want a happy marriage with a loyal grill who actually loves you; marry a virgin with an intact pair bonding ability. Sex will seal the partnership and you'll live happily together. Marry a 20+ body count sloot and sex will literally mean nothing to her and she'll feel no desire to remain loyal.
I honestly think it [WW3] would be better at this point. If the choice is between Nazis rising and the left recklessly allowing so many Muslims into the country, it turns out just as well for my gay ass either way. I still have more respect for Nazis than Muslims and their enablers -- at least the Nazis don't hate themselves like the left does.
(PynkPussyDiet)
Does anyone else feel sad for women who are trying to be male?
I went in AskTG and there's a few FtM posts that just make me so sad. I hated being female from 11-14 fuck actually I only started liking being a woman after discovering this sub and radical feminism. Around 11 I went through a phase where I told people call me by a boy's name and cut off my hair. I got mad when boys my age called me male though (they were dicks though).
I feel like so many of these girls describe the powerlessness all women feel. All women want to be treated as male. All women hate being female (the way society treats us, period issues, dealing with doctors) so I really feel for FtM who describe wanting to be male. It's just really really sad that society has beaten so many of us down to the point we can't even identify with our own bodies.
It sucks that FtM feel like they can't come to our sub cause we're hateful in their minds.
Could we make a stickied post directly for FtM? Basically saying what GC women stand for, what radical feminism is, maybe something supportive? I like that this sub is combative and does encourage discussion (arguments) but maybe in the stickied post we can avoid posts saying they should fight for women's rights instead of dipping out of the gender.
Idk. It just made me sad because I understand FtM and many don't see that we do. Thoughts?
(ChewMyMeatForYou)
I mean, as an infertile woman with menstrual issues, I can understand how a uterus feels like a timebomb. As a trauma survivor, I understand the desire to be invisible and walk unmolested by even the male gaze.
But as a spiritual feminist, no, that's where I get lost. Because some here might think it ridiculous or magical thinking or reinforcing the ladyfeels, but I am a creature tied to the moon, to the ebb and flow of the tides, who can read energy, and that is absolutely biological and not my social conditioning. I see SO many TIMs trying to colonize witchcraft and it urks me, because I know they cannot feel how we know why the moon goes dark and full. To be a woman is to know mystery. Anyone on birth control is somewhat divorced from this experience.
I also don't understand the TIFs obsessions to be gay men. It's wierd af to me, to be appropriating their culture and it's like the TIFs want to be simultaneously liked for being campy and attractive, but hold on to that sassybitchcard and avoid the confrontation of being an assertive female. Gay mens' obsession with appearance is just as shallow as a woman obsessed with makeup and clothes. They're just conscripted for assumed consensual anal.
I'm trying to be as understanding as I can, but I don't understand people who try to make fantasy reality. We ALL live with limitations and weaknesses. Some people view that as a challenge to overcome them, some embrace them as a Christian duty to bear, some ignore them to their detriment. The overwhelming amount of trans folks obsessed with porn and anime says they are people detached from universal human emotion.
Think about it. How was leftism introduced? Can you pinpoint when and how exactly it became the norm to dye your hair in all sorts of colors? Can you pinpoint when the left become so violent?
Can you pinpoint when degeneracy became so blatantly obvious in media?
Think media. Very few girls posted themselves half naked online, then it was hip, and now every other one does it?
Think males. It was okay to be masculine but now it's being framed as toxic to be who you are naturally inclined to be and now you're a nazi for being yourself?
Think the LGBTQABCDEF community. It was 2, then 3, then 4 genders, and now they're introducing pedophilia??
Normalizing behavior desensitizes those who are exposed to that behavior/content/etc.
Porn? Masturbation? Sedentary lifestyle? University right after high school? LGBT? Accepting mental disorders and not treating them? Depression?
People suddenly turning LGBT(tumblr, twitter, brigading leftie subs)? Remember we saw this recently in a study that says that a group of friends quickly becomes LGBT once a member turns https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0202330
People board the train and it's easy to introduce and change norms once the train takes off, all you have to do is slowly introduce them and then constantly bombard them. Think Syria and the US (wsj article)
The US has been involved in the middle east... all the time? It just became the norm to be involved in the middle east? Also take into account that all these countries have issues to worry about in their homeland, including but not limited to mass refugee immigration and drumpf.
The point I'm trying to make is that by employing the same strategies, we can introduce the masses to our ideology. People will joke about it but inside they will feel uneasy and the more they see it the further they are pushed to the other side.
I do not think we will be fighting marxists, but Individualists. Civic nationlists/gloablists/collectivists vs. ethnic nationalists/collectivists. Marxists will be long gone by then.
The multi-racial civic collectivist actually IS what the marxists tried to achieve. The New World Citizen, a globalistic Übermensch, without racial or national identity, history, heritage and past. A new rootless cosmopolitan class that has no stake in any traditional world view whatsoever. Of course that won't work, just look at brazil. But they advertise it to the leftists as overcoming "race" and racism, by mixing all races, then offering them a common moral framework. There will be those who see racial identity as a value in itself and those who rather believe that race has no value and gather around a common set of abstract and questionable values, like a world constitution and universal egalitarianism. The marxists only played a role in opening up societies(see Soros Open Society Foundation), opening the borders, making Illegals into legal citizens, shaping public opinion, saving "refugees", forcing people to tolerate each other, all so this mix up can happen. They've been a tool of the globalists, useful idiots, nothing more. Divide an conquer. If globalists are unable to integrate the US, land of freedom, into their plans for the planet, well... flood them with immigrants who will vote against the natives interests.
Whatever the case. How to prepare to face the future:
Whatever it will be we will be looking at more of a civil war/conflict type of scenario. At least the clash of civilizations. The most dominant group will win. And this will be the group with the greatest spiritual and cultural strength aswell as man power.
So I say it woud be benefitial to actually plan for a multi generational conflict. This is going to take a loooong time. The reconquista took about 400 years, so... start fucking people.
1. Move to the countysite and build (energy/food and control) independent traditionalists communities.
2. Have as many children as possible.
3. Form many secret brotherhoods fighting for white interests all over the western world that are able to collaborate.
4. Infiltrate politics on all levels.
5. Slowly reconquer the cities.
6. Move into the media on all levels. Shape public opinion.
7. In the cities, build white fraternities where the white students can study together for their common goals.
8. Perform soft Eugenics, for example selective breeding to increase IQ and bodily health. In civilization we must take the place of nature otherwise we will all be living as cripples, riddled with diseases in the future.
9. Form a new kind of spiritual world view, morality and traditions, sth. that is timeless and binds all together.
All in mine craft of course.
80/20 is just what was recorded. I've been in the dating game for a long time as an attractive male and I would say the below average/average women go for the top 15%, and any girl above a 6/10 aims for the top 5% of males in the prime years (18-28 unless suavemaxed). Girls 7 and above online will go for the top 2% so don't even bother.
You need to keep in mind, this is just what was SURVEYED. Like there should be a second survey on the types of girls that do surveys. The average girl or girl on Tinder isn't going to sign up for a survey, mostly ugly girls with free time were probably the group. So yeah, the direct bottom tier of women still want the top 20% of males. And guess what, if they are patient enough.. they get it. Why would a thick out of shape chick want to 'settle' for a guy near her looksmatch when she can wait 3 days and fuck a stud. And because in the past couple decades in USA we've removed whore-shaming.. women are EMPOWERED to behave like this. Empowered to literally behave like sexual toddlers with toys. The hottest thing to most men is a girl who will kiss them passionately and show them love. The hottest thing to a woman? A brooding 6'2 guy in nightclub attire who will fuck her over a toilet in a nightclub, cum inside of her, and leave without a word. I'm sure if a female even read this she'd probably need to go rub one out. Fucking animals. I don't hate women, it's just the way it is.
I've had nights where I started finding a thick out of shape chick attractive because I hadn't jerked off in a few days and almost made mistakes, and I'm 31. Imagine a 21 year old Chad having the same thoughts with 3x my sex drive.. it's a brutal game but the pieces are already on the board.
The only thing a male can do is improve his dominant posture and eye contact, skin health, and muscle harmony. You'd be surprised what practicing dominant eye contact can do. Try it for a week- stare at everyone you meet and do not break gaze.
I can't even describe my disappointment when I saw this post on /r/truechristian. I really expected more from this subreddit.
Mutations don't explain the incredible design and diversity of creatures on this planet. You've eaten up the "scientific" consensus; hook, line, and sinker. I don't find any of the arguments by evolutionary scientists to be compelling. It's born in the fiery hatred for God almighty, and to this day it takes a beast of it's own, dedicated to devouring in its path.
Sounds like arrogance to me to claim evolution has that much more over creationism. I don't care what the scientific consensus is. Just because the "professionals" believe something, doesn't mean I have to put my faith in the same thing. In this case, it is evolution. What defines a professional? Their degree and time spent in the field? Fine. But if we both can sit down and you can't explain the major problems evolution has, then no matter how much of a professional you are, you are making faith based claims. I schooled my professors in school doing this. It is fun seeing the look of dumbfoundedness on their face when you point out the problems, but don't tell them you are a YEC yet. Lol...
Quantum physics and general relativity should also be questioned. Question everything. Evolution still in no way has any actual evidence. I've taken classes, read books, and spent many years studying it. I believed in it for years after becoming unconvinced of creationism. And then I realized I had been duped, and reverted back to young earth Creationism. You claim you have evidence, but you haven't provided any evidence in this post other than opinion. And arrogantly at that.
Evolution is not the consensus. That is simply what you have been duped into believing, because the gatekeepers of scientific journalism portray it that way, because evolution is their religion. The real fact is that yes, everything is related, but nobody actually knows how the heck it got here other than by a miracle. That which transcends naturalism. Many of the long refuted arguments against evolution still stand. But nobody dares to challenge evolution if they are a paid scientist, because they might lose their job.
You seriously need to step back and be analytical about what a belief in macro evolution entails. It essentially demands your utter rejection of Genesis chapter 1, the story of how we came to be. The two are not compatible. God was not guessing when he inspired Moses to write it. He had a solid grasp on what a day was, what years are, and what millennia is.
God specifically said 6 days then he rested. He didn’t spend millions of years between each day and just call it a day, it literally was a day. For you to accept macro evolution, you must accept the Bible is incorrect at this point. If it’s incorrect in the first chapter of the first book, where else is it invalid? See where this goes?
Your rejection of what God clearly states is in effect a rejection of God Himself.
It doesn't matter if he had an intention of acting on it. What makes him unique is his capacity to sexualize children. If he is at all attracted to little kids, I don't give two fucks about his actions or his brand of kiddy porn; it's dangerous for him to be around children, because unlike most people, even if he promises, we still know he day dreams about fucking kids.
I understand your sentiment, but just to play devil's advocate, how would it be any different if, say, a teacher was attracted to 18 year old girls? Is that also dangerous and firable? He hasn't (as far as we know) actually committed any crime, has he?
No he hasn't committed a crime. And no, changing the genders makes no difference. Changing the age does make a difference, I'm not talking about 18 year olds, legal adults. I'm talking about the majority of school children who are below that
I know, I get what you're saying. What I guess I'm getting at is that you're advocating firing someone based on thought crime. Like, if he liked 18 year olds (or lets say 17, since that's generally the threshold for commuting statutory rape in the US if one partner is over 21), isn't he just as likely to act on that as any other age?
I'm just curious, I don't get the big upset about person A finding person B sexually attractive provided they don't actually act on that.
totally inappropriate to expose children to anyone who sees them as sexual candidates.
I don't know. I feel like that's a very slippery slope. I'm certainly not defending actual pedophiles -- that is, people who act on their fantisies, not folks who look at literal cartoons -- but I think we're nearing questionable territory.
What if I find blonde haired people attractive? Should I not work in an environment with them? Most people would say that was a weird conclusion to jump to: just because someone finds something attractive doesn't necessarily mean that person is going to violently act on that fantasy.
[Comment under "what is your options on the Ustaše?"]
Last really decent racial Balkan party. Croats and Slovenians should unit as the best races there. The other Balkan people are underdeveloped in comparison and far more corrupt. Serbia especially in the South is a cesspool for European standards. The Balkan region would be way, way better off now with a fascistic win overall and as such Fascist Italian hegemony to an extent at least in the region (like what happened initially). Though some Northern-Serbs are of good stock as well. Croats are dying a slow liberal death now sadly.
I would take the Serbian and communistic propaganda on the regime with a pinch of salt. I'm sure the civil war was brutal but that was the case vice versa, plus Serbs were the oppressors originally creating a multicultural regime without the consent of the other nations people there. We also should not forget that the commies under Serbian hegemony killed all the Germans and Italians living in the Balkan after WW2 (high thousands of people) and a lot of defenseless citizens of the Croatian state. It's the same as with the Jewish holocaust. Mass-murderers crying wolf I can only laugh at it. The high numbers they now proclaim don't even add up with the official stands of the commie regime afterwards at all. I can't care to investigate what happened at those Croatian camps though and it would be next to impossible to get the real story anyway.
The far better side lost in reality. The Axis. That's why Europe is dying overall. Edit: I hurt Serbian feelings I see. Lol. Looking at what some of those cretins are saying here I can only laugh. Should have remained a puppet state of the Reich at best.
Transgender Politics is the Easy Way Out
Anyone should be able to do whatever they want, regardless of the stereotypical confines of their biological sex, as long as it does not harm others.
This is a maxim that both liberal feminists and radical feminists would agree with. The solution should be to eliminate the stereotypical confines. However, this is not possible in 2018, so rather than try to move toward that end, liberal feminists have invented the concept of gender in an attempt to mitigate the effects of the stereotypes for certain fringe individuals (while paradoxically strengthening the stereotypes for society as a whole). The concept of transgender is a much easier pill for middle America to swallow than the possibility of gender confines being pointless nonsense.
Consider a hypothetical: a biological male working at a law firm decides to wear a skirt to work. Law is a rather conservative industry, so the dress code does not allow men to wear skirts. The attorney’s boss gets annoyed and asks him why he is wearing a skirt. The most earnest answer would be “because I want to, and the dress code is stupid,” but that is just going to anger the boss further, and interfering in such tedious office politics is not traditionally the end goal of many political movements. So the attorney instead says “because I am a woman, and women are allowed to wear skirts.” The boss doesn’t actually understand this either, but it doesn’t annoy him as much as the first answer would, and the political movement tells him “transwomen are women,” so he can carry on with his day silently wondering if he’s the only one not smart enough to see the emperor’s new clothes.
Therefore, the transgender movement is a way for the most feminine biological males to wear whatever they want wherever they want in 2018. Is this a laudable achievement? Sure. But should it come at the price of everyone else? Should “masculine-presenting” women be considered to be men, unless they tell us otherwise? Should children who don’t like the right color of clothes be injected with hormones? Probably not.
And then the liberal feminists get themselves tangled up in their own fake logic (or perhaps more cynically need to keep the coverup going so that no one catches on), so people who eschewed the stereotypical demands of yore—anyone from Dante Tex Gill to Joan of Arc—are labeled transgender instead of the true renegades who said “I want to, and the dress code is stupid.”
[They are reacting to a thread of people bitching about men having to register with the selective service]
(BoozeBabe)
Where the fuck are all the feminists?
Uhhh, not fighting to have more people forced to sign up to fight men’s wars. That’s where.
(ghostrpostr)
They dont want to be free from oppression, they want women to join them in it. Funny how that is. Typical male mindset though, either make everyone fix all your problems for you or make them suffer through them with you
(DuckingWrong)
lmao at pointing out them only bitching and moaning that feminists wont come save the day, even though its a MANS problem created by MEN.
(steppe_dweller)
Typical liberal feminism too: no fundamental change, just a certain amount of mostly legal 'equity' within the current system.
(Hooksandfangs)
A lot of us feminists aren’t in the US, for starters. Go sort your own self-inflicted problems, war-mongering American men.
(whoreadstheseanymore)
because everything is always women's fault.
lemme get this straight, though- war, that thing that men have been doing for a thousand years to rape, murder, and pillage with impunity, that thing that the united states' male-run government is currently propogating to enrich weapons and oil companies also run by men? we're supposed to pity them and fight their fights even though they hate us? nah, sort that one out amongst yourselves, you fucking monsters.
Re: On how the only aspects of "womanhood" that are valued are the ones males can buy into
(lacubana)
Yesssss thissssss
Wanna know when I felt most “like a woman”? I can tell you I sure wasn’t wearing makeup or heels or having a pillow fight. I wasn’t delicate in the slightest.
It was when I was pushing another human I had made out of my body. Oh yeah that.
(earthgarden)
and if you're not pushing a human out, or in the process of growing a human, you get a monthly reminder by your body (for at least 4 f!cking decades of your life!) that it had to tear down the nest it built just in case you set one to growing. I swear to god!! If men could experience a period ONCE they would leave us TF alone! That would be an end to the oppression because their pity would know no bounds, they'd experience massive shame at the treatment men have inflicted upon female humanity these long millennia. because then they'd realize nature already oppresses us just fine, thank you very much
(LadyCeer)
My dad used to be really sweet about it and let me sleep a lot and he fed me eggs and ibuprofen and was just very kind when I was being shot down by my period. He also used to talk to women in the form of long, friendly, non-sexual conversations....But then, he never tried to become a woman. Maybe that's a connection.
(shortstroll)
I don't know about your theory but I think it's one of two options.
The first is that some of them are just gay men who in their formative years internalised gender roles. So since they like clothes, have a crush on a dude and their penis isnt a major erogenous zones they think they are girls. It's also sub conscious sexual strategy. There's a greater selection of partners for them if they can fake being a woman. In fact you now see them pushing the idea that genuine heterosexual males would knowingly copulate with a tim.
The second is that some of them are straight men who just have a weird fetishism of womanhood. They don't just want to have sex with women, they want to be them. This isn't dissimilar from the cannibals who get sexual gratification from eating their sexual partners. Bruce Jenner is the perfect example of this. He slowly turned himself into a male version of his wife and the closer he got to his goal the greater his resentment of her grew. Once he had completed his transition, he didn't just discard her, he tried to destroy her in the media. I'm convinced that in a different world, he would have murdered her. That would have been his version of a perfect conclusion.
(TerribleConfusion)
I saw Graham Linehan retweeted a man suggesting something similar. It’s hard to empathise with this, as a woman, but it seemed to make sense to him and the other guy. And I suppose when you think about it, a lot of men do get INCREDIBLY uncomfortable when discussing ways in which men oppress women. Even decent guys don’t want to think about it. So I can kind of imagine how that discomfort might feed in to autogynephilia. Maybe when you feel like your desire is oppressive you want to be the object of desire instead of the subject.
It’s very hard to reconcile this with how misogynistic many TIMs are, though. But I suppose maybe they feel like they’re allowed to hate and bully women because they’re “women” too, and they’re more special and oppressed than any other kind of woman blah blah etc. And maybe it’s the most misogynistic and shitty of men who are most uncomfortable with themselves deep down so they transition to escape their own shittiness. Spoiler: they don’t escape it, they just found a different method than other misogynists to project their shittiness on to (actual) women.
(witchy_xx)
actually this is the exact reason given when my ex came out as trans. he wanted to escape the role of oppressor. what a load of shit.
it's also an easy power grab. for example that asshat Hailey Heartless was a no one politically before and now everyone knows his name.
(griffxx)
We have seen TIMs along with their Handmaidens, trying to dislocate all things female, from the definition of of woman, womanhood and female. I'm truly fascinated, in a psychologically clinical way, the TIMs asserting that they have Bloodless Periods. This a whole other level of Delusion.
Why on Earth did these Feminized White Men, think they could dictate WOMEN diminished our Womanhood, for their OBSESSIVE NARCISSISTIC NEED FOR THE VALIDATION OF THEIR GENDER IDENTITIES!!!!!
The minute these Prostate Havers and their Handmaidens said point blank that, "FEMALE BIOLOGY AND THE EXPERIENCES OF LIVING IN THE BODY, HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH WOMANHOOD" this Misogynistic, Homophobic and Racist Movement should have been REELED/REALED in to what it was supposed to be:
Lobbying and advocating for laws that reassert Civil Rights protections against various forms of discrimination.
They have framed as "A FIGHT FOR THEIR EXISTENCE" this is categorically A LIE.
And to make the claim there are plenty of Lesbians that will date and fuck them; Bisexual leaning women more like. If this were true the Cotton Ceiling War Against Lesbian Sexuality would have ended 5 years ago. Instead it's still continues, and we are at 7.5 year mark.
We need to build on the momentum, we currently have. We need to explain to the Civilian class of women--> not part of the Feminist or LGBTQ Communities, how White TIMs are engaged in the process of erasing their sex-based protections, in the name of attaining their Civil Rights
(scienceisarealthing)
I have no way of knowing whether most pass or not. I’ve never seen a study. All I have is anecdotal evidence.
I've seen a lot of trans-identified males in real life as well as in photo & it's very rare for them to pass. The few who do pass visually are clockable as male as soon as you hear their voice, see their body shape, or see how large their bone structure is when they are next to a female person. This is not meant as an "insult" btw, bc there's nothing wrong with being a feminine male (as long as they arent sexist, etc...)
Transmisogyny is intrinsically illogical bc either the trans-ID'd male passes as female (and experiences some forms of misogyny) or he is clocked as male & faces homophobia/ transphobia/ whatever you wanna call hatred/ disgust against gnc males. It's the reason why drunk guys will sometimes hit on a trans-ID'd male, then the moment they find out he's actually male will scream things like "Fggot! Trnny!!" and sometimes resort to physical violence. That is NOT an example of misogyny bc it wouldn't happen to a female.
How would you know you saw a trans person if they did pass though?
I've never seen a trans-ID'd male who passes in real life, only in photos. There's just no getting around the differences in bone structure, voice, and movements between males and females when you observe people in real life. As someone who is involved in the natural sciences & figure drawing, it is easy to determine someone's natal sex & tell if they are trans or not.
edit: I mean, even when you look at the transpassing sub, few pass even in photo. It does a disservice to trans people to lie to them by telling them they pass when they don't. I see women and other trans people do this all the time & it makes me cringe, because it's so obviously.. not true. In fact, it comes across as cruel to lie to someone like that. It should be ok for people to look/ dress however they want without striving for the unattainable goal of passing completely as the opposite sex.
If a trans woman passes as female, what forms of misogyny would they not face? Honest question. Is it just from medical professionals who would know about someone’s private health details? If they pass, then why would it come up in conversation?
Side question, why does it matter if someone is facing violence due to misogyny or transphobia? Why put up one more barrier between people who have similar experiences under the same system?
It is impossible to say definitively whether or not most trans women can pass based on one person’s interaction with the public. You can definitely say that you’ve seen some trans people not passing. Why would anyone reveal their medical history to a stranger?
Jesus christ, seriously? They wouldn't face:
-limited birth control access, abortion access, reproductive rights battles
-the pain of pregnancy/ discrimination against pregnant women
-dying in childbirth
-the fear of becoming pregnant
-menstrual pain/ stigma/ menstrual huts
-female genital mutilation
-femicide/ sex selective abortion
-medical stigma against female health concerns like PCOS, uterine cysts, endometriosis, severe PMS, menopause, etc... (the list goes on & on)
-sex trafficking & rape (most men want to rape females, not trans-ID'd males)
-being sold as a child bride
-limited access to education bc of being female
-breast ironing
-bride burning
-foot binding (though this only happened to females in the past, as far as i know)
I'm leaving off so much more I can't think of right now. Trans men, nonbinary females, women.. we all face these issues based on what part of the world we live in. It matters whether someone faces misogyny vs. homophobia/ transphobia because those are different forms of oppression! By your same logic, we could include men who face racism under the branch of feminism because (as you said) "Why put up one more barrier between people who have similar experiences?"
FEMinism is the only political movement that is exclusively for FEMales. It's horrible that other people face different forms of oppression, but they can form their own movements to address their needs. Black women & black men both face racism but ONLY black women are welcome in feminism. Poor men & poor women are both economically oppressed, but ONLY the poor woman is welcome in feminism. A woman & a passing trans-ID'd male may both be catcalled, but ONLY the woman is welcome in feminism.
Trans-ID'd males are welcome to (and in fact, already have) formed their own political movements against the unique problems they face. It is narcissistic and unreasonable to demand that women dismantle the ONLY political movement that we have to ourselves. Can female people seriously have nothing to ourselves?Do we have to give in to every group who wants "in"? We can be allies with each other to overcome some similar problems we may face (if any), but we are not the same, and that distinction in lived reality matters.
Isn’t feminism for anyone who believes in the social, economic, and political equality of women? Everyone is welcome. That is a great point about not including everyone who is oppressed ever, but the type of oppression we are talking about is targeted at people who present as female. What I find disturbing by your response is that you aren’t inclusive. Why do you need to say that someone is not welcome if they are experiencing something as common as cat calling or workplace harassment? Would it be so bad if a trans woman was in your circle? Would you not feel safe? I don’t understand what benefit there is to being so specific in membership? It seems to me that it would be best to differentiate by who is suffering a type of discrimination. For example, a trans woman might be subject to being talked down to in public (there is a great TEDtalk by a trans woman who knows what it is like to walk around in society as an adult male and an adult female. She passes btw). A trans male might have not had access to birth control prior to transitioning. I would think both types of people would be welcome.
Feminism is Liberation of females from male oppression. We are already equal, stating that is redundant and offensive.
Re: Couple of TiMs hogging the front row at "women-only" festival. Check the 3rd photo.
(box_of_no_north)
What's kinda odd is that they apparently allow "trans-men" to attend... so if they recognize the difference between "cis-men" and "trans-men", shouldn't they also naturally recognize the difference between "trans-women" and "cis-women"? I guess not...
(Carthimundia)
Ok so trans men can attend, and so can women, trans women, non binaries, and agenders. So really only “cis” men are banned. If this kind of exclusion becomes more popular I can totally see “cis” men suing for gender discrimination. They are being barred from events just because of their “gender identity” and not for any good, material reason that is justifiable. In effect, these organisers have said “if you identify a certain way, and have this kind of gender identity, you can’t be trusted to behave yourself” which is discrimination. The non binary “males assigned at birth” , the men who are “females assigned at birth” , and the women who are “males assigned at birth” are all trusted to behave themselves but the men who are “males assigned at birth” aren’t allowed in?
A “cis man” could easily argue that he has the exact same gender identity as a “trans man”, and the exact same same as a “trans woman” and thus his exclusion is unfair and arbitrary. And so “cis men” can’t be banned from anything purely on the basis ‘of what gender they identify as.
Note I’ve used a lot of the kind of language they use so I’ve put it in scare quotes.
(Feminazcabooby)
Transmen are where the wheels fall off the thing for a lot of people.
"Should transwomen automatically be put in the women's jail?" is a question many people reflexively answer yes to.
"Should transmen automatically be put in the men's jail?" gets some different responses.
Gee, it's almost like oppression is sex-based and you can't identify out of it.
(Carthimundia)
The trans lobby argues that it is more appropriate to separate areas by gender identity as opposed to sex. I’m just pointing out that this may not even be legally feasible. What this means is that gender separated spaces may entirely cease to exist.
(yishengqingwa666)
Typical colonizing TIMs.
(Masked_WolfDragoness)
Yeah no. TiMs can go fuck off.
Re: Taiwan to make English an official second language next year: Premier Lai
(HenryHwang)
This is awful. No, just no. This just keeps playing into Asia’s trend of white-worship. That’s it, boys. It’s over for us. Too many Asian countries are kissing European languages in the ass.
(god-fist)
Cucks. Notice how English is in every asian country, everything is bilingual to pander to whites and westerners. This move will invite thousands of ESL teachers.
(TheeNay3)
You know why it's so difficult for Asians in the diaspora to make headway against self-hate? It's because for every step they take forward, the ones in the "old country" take two back.
(KhanHohii)
Unfortunately I have to agree with you. I've been watching Mainland China television a bit lately, I see a trend of promoting WMAF and White features as the standard.
Woke Asian Americans and Woke Asians are far and few. We are surrounded by a bunch of KKKucks.
(fullasiancuq)
Oh lord, this is gonna invite a mass wave of Anglo sexpats into all of Asia, not just Taiwan. There is massive collateral damage, just like how many sexpats in Thailand are vacationing ESL teachers from other Asian countries.
(elmoheadbutt)
Oh FFS Asia can you please just stop being cucks for a second?!? For every step we take forward, we take 10 back...
(Chinesepatriot84)
Sellout Asians deserve what’s coming to them, to be victims of their own stupidity. Woke Asians should get some popcorn and watch the car crash.
The Taiwanese will also spread all Taiwanese women’s and children’s legs ready for racist rape by foreign sexpats and the men will castrate themselves as a courtesy to white men and kowtow.
You can lead a sellout to self-respect, but you can’t make them think.
Re: How long do you think would Chads and Stacys last in our world?
(Deathsoundssweet)
Less than a day.
"Wait, why do people all of a sudden think that I act cringey?"
"Wait, why did it became so hard socialize all of a sudden?"
"Wait, why does it seem way harder now to get a good career going?"
"Wait, why do most people think they are better than me ?"
"Wait, why doesn't my personality attract the other gender anymore?"
"Wait, why does my mental health started to suffer?
"Wait, where did my huge circle of friends go?"
"Wait, why does life seem more like a burden now?"
(xxxrivenmainxxx)
Less than a day. Lets see what the average stacy does all day
1) post on social media? not possible anymore
2) get validation from orbiters? yeah you wish
3) fuck with chad? nope
4) meet up with becky friends? cant do that either
5) cheat through life without doing any work? cant do that as incel
(MobilePenor)
I worked in the self-help industry for some time (I still kinda do), and I remember those normie gurus talking about resiliency and similar concepts made me mad as hell.
Of course you put a lot of energy and effort when you see results coming. Of course you find energy and effort when you go home to a nice wife, you go out with friends or you had positive socialization experiences in your youth.
Also it was fun how they all talked about empathy and listening, yet they weren't able to relate to people with serious difficulties, like uglies or people with no social abilities.
(cudio)
That's everybody. Their "empathy and listening" is at most some completely meaningless encouraging words so they can feel better about themselves and show that they are virtuous. For all of their preaching about "personality", normal people have the most revolting personalities of all. But I guess that's what they mean, just appear to be a good person, just put on an act.
(WhereDidSerotoninGo)
Examples from one AskReddit thread. Face = Life.
https://i.imgur.com/XZbXXSb.png
(feministdunce)
Holy crap that's brutal. Face and height/frame = life.
I have this one fleece jacket I wear that makes my traps/shoulder area look a lot bigger and whenever I wear it I get treated 500x better than when I wear a plain shirt. I thought maybe it was just in my head until I decided to just wake up not even shower or brush my hair and wear it. Still got treated better than my most upbeat and energetic day without the 'shoulder fleece'. TLDR: A few inches on your shoulders and traps can determine if you are going to be treated like scum or like a blessing to humanity. Fuck people.
(WaitingOutABan)
Gwenyth Paltrow blackpilled herself by accident during the filming of Shallow Hal
She had to occasionally walk around in public with the fat suit and she lamented how people seemed to avoid her rather than fawn over her because she’s Stacy.
She noticed how men would either laugh or look disgusted at her rather than staring like an idiot
And perhaps the darkest blackpill of them all (but somewhat positive compared to the others), she noticed how crew members who knew she was just Gwenyth Paltrow in a fat suit seemed less nervous to be around her than when she was her normal pretty self. The effect was that strong
(virga944)
The only reason we can trudge on is because we were born in it, molded by it.
A normalfag falling into incel status would either fall into heavy substance abuse or rope after a year or so.
He once drew loli art of Keemstar's underage daughter as a fucked up "joke". I'd argue that there is indeed something wrong with drawing softcore porn of someone's daughter because you got in a dumb twitter feud with them, and "he likes being edgy" is a shit excuse for vile behavior.
Why? It's just a drawing. You can't just go around demanding people not draw things just because you don't like them.
Re: AskTG eats itself over one mod telling the others not to flash their dicks in the women's change room.
(party_of_fire)
It takes a while to figure out but essentially the AskTG flashers are now furious at mod Wannabkate for saying Enbie is a slur {hahahahahaha they can't even keep up with what's supposed to be offensive this week} and for telling the subreddit that you shouldn't flash your dicks at women in the change room.
Telling mentally deranged men to not flash their cocks at unsuspecting girls and women in the female change room is the height of discrimination and bigotry in [Current Year]. Jesus. Fucking. Christ.
I'm honestly surprised Trumpsters haven't begun using this example (and the never ending list of trans fuckery) in an attempt to win the midterms. How many right wing autogynephiles does the GOP have donating to them?
(minimal-menace)
Part of the compilation is a thread called
"[META] Trans Women Need Trans Women Mods - Can We Get Some?"
Affirm whatever we say! Now affirm it harder!
Who do they think has always been running that sub? Now they're aghast that occasionally they're disagreeing among themselves?
The assumption that it must be outsiders, meddlers, women deleting their posts is just so sad.
Everything is really so us-versus-them on that sub, and it leads to such a damaging, culty mentality.
(Einsamax)
Trans groups have been divisive for as long as I can remember. I remember making a post in a non-trans related group and a roving band of most likely self identified trans people dog piled on one of my posts where I said I didn't want my identity to just be "TRANS!" and that I wanted to be respected for being a good person.
In trans subreddits I usually get downvoted for saying that I am able to have a civil conversation here. Funny how much can be achieved when you don't go looking for a fight. Don't get me started on the thinly veiled, sometimes full on, death threats that are directed towards the people of this sub. Loving and tolerant my ass.
(baremon7)
Your comment is so on, it is unbelievable how these men actually think.
"Telling mentally deranged men to not flash their cocks at unsuspecting girls and women in the female change room is the height of discrimination and bigotry in [Current Year]. Jesus. Fucking. Christ."
I think some of them just realized how many of them are there just to entertain themselves with tormenting unsuspecting women just out in public with their families. Normally, these men would have no right, opportunity or reason to legally flash a boner and stalk these frightened women around a locker room for a thrill
(Snuggle_Kitty_AGoGo)
From what I’ve read they hate them for being against Nature and masculinity. And for entering young girls spaces. Only the incels seem to love da tranz. Rednecks seem to also hate incels.
(Mountains_beyond)
There are plenty of right wing sites that post about trans insanity- the bl@ze, d@ily caller, etc. It’s yet another “men on the right see women (and children) as private property, men on the left see women as public property’ issue.
Right wingers don’t want those nasty pervs around their women, unless the pervs are GOP candidates or donors. Men can do whatever they want in their own home, of course. They also see it as a wedge issue to make liberals look crazy, which is unfortunately true.
(Quixoticfutz)
Assuming you meant "private" in one of those, I completely agree.
Unfortunately true, I'm an avowed leftist and having to constantly argue with both left and right is exhausting, hell I even argue with centrists.
Can I make this job? At least I'd get payed.
(party_of_fire)
The creepy guy who offers hormones to children doesn't think you should flash your dick fellas
Because women have the right to privacy from strange men and the right to not have dicks shoved in their faces at every opportunity? No, pffft! Of fucking course not! It's because it doesn't look good for the community. They have to wait for it to be legislated first and then everyone can get their rape on.
Does DrewiePaedo really think that laws allowing this shit aren't going to be revoked after complaints of girls being exposed to the microdick of pervs like "Autumn"?
(FuzzyFakeFur)
Anyone have a link to the locker room post?
Edit: Okay, so I found it. And .... this:
"You notice how no one gets up in arms about trans men using the men's room? Because nobody actually gives a shit what goes on in men's rooms."
WHICH MEANS YOU SHOULD GO BACK TO USING THE MEN'S ROOM, DICKHEAD. But they're embarrassed of how they dress, so they won't change in there.
Re: Hey heterosexual radfems, how do you date men?
(liesarenotacceptance)
I don't date. It's much better for my emotional and physical health. I'm not lonely. I have friends. I have a dog. I have Netflix. At this point I'm so used to being in control of my own home, body, and time, I think trying to date someone who's been socialized his whole life to expect me to be his damn servant would just annoy the Hell out of me.
(atasheep)
Not straight but I’d guess they pick the least worse or something? Besides those who think they boyfriend is different from all men.
(womenopausal)
I don't. Since the porn explosion, I haven't found a man who can fuck worth a damn and I don't need one for anything else.
(PaleCornflowerBlue)
Dating radfem is an oxymoron. As you've already pointed out all men are dangerous and you have to be constantly on guard and expect them to do some shit. Ie you waste a ton of emotional recourses to just be with a man, and wasting recourses on men and risking yourself is not really what radfem teaches you.
You're not "doomed" to be alone. Loneliness is not painful if you have female friends and see a person and friend in yourself. We're taught that we're nothing without men, that we're incomplete without relationship, that we're worthless if no one loves us in a dick way. Those are all lies to keep us depending on men. There are plenty other ways to bring excitement into your life that don't involve men
(ExternalBid)
I agree with this. Dating/being in a relationship with/ marrying men are not feminist decisions. They can be choices that can improve your personal happiness but to try to reconcile them with feminism is futile imo
(gendercriticalonly)
I don’t anymore. I did for many years, and the power imbalance always came out, the expectations and such like. I decided that I wasn’t sufficiently bothered to compromise on this (I like my own company, I have friends and family, I enjoy doing things alone). If I came across someone, and we hit it off, great. Otherwise, it’s not something I want that badly.
I know exactly one man in a relationship with a woman who seems to just act like a person in a relationship with another person, no politics or manipulation or threats to sense of identity or domestic ineptitude or whatever. He’s a grown up, and he just gets on with things when they need to be done, and he supports his wife and loves his children and supports and encourages them without respect to gender. One man. Out of every one I know.
So it’s possible, but I wouldn’t hold my breath.
(StunningGift)
I've never dated a man and I'm worried about what would happen when I try. I learned that I'm still susceptible to manipulation by men, but I'm thankful it's only a friendship that I'm in and not a relationship because I'm not sure if I'd be able to quit it without being hurt first.
I know some women who take chances to date men, and even my 50yo mother hasn't learned all men are out to disappoint, manipulate and abuse. I'm not even sure how she justifies her choice at this point.
Re: Something I've noticed about transgender dating.
After I dumped my mtf boyfriend for becoming a woman when I'm straight I googled the situation out of curiosity. Maybe I'm biased but this is just something I've noticed. Whenever a wife/girlfriend describes her partner as being transgender people say "just take it one step at a time you may find you're still attracted". Yeah, okay if someone's straight they're NOT going to stay romantically or sexually attracted to someone who's transitioning to be female. *upturned eyes emojis*
But if it's a gay man who's partner is becoming MTF the answers tend to be more honest and practial "you're not compatible just be friends".
I hate to see sexism in absolutely everything but what else would it be?
(1984stardusta)
They will say two things at the same time:
Trans women are women and if lesbians are not attracted to female penises they are not able to love all women, thus they are not true lezbians, but vagina fetishists who hate women in every shapes and forms.
Or trans women are women, if your husband becomes a woman you have to keep loving him, because he is the same person in a different body and love doesn't care, just learn to be a lesbian and change your identity and sexual orientation for love.
In both cases women need to ignore preferences, boundaries and sexual attraction to pander to his needs, lesbians need to become heterosexual and heteros need to become lesbians because his sexuality is more important.
(gfty6789)
Right, imagine the outcry if everyone just started saying "no, you're being a vagina fetisist, go sleep with that penis" to TIMs.
(Cineezyy)
I remember going on one of the subs that discusses trans partners and the majority of posts by females (with a MtF partner) were talking about how they can be supportive to maintain the relationship. While the posts by males (with a FtM partner) were talking about how their dick will no longer get hard.
(1984stardusta)
The burden on the partner is absurd, how can someone condemn natural and healthy sexual drive?
All the pressure to repress sexuality in name of a greater good is regressive. Ignore your feelings, thoughts, preferences and just be nice! Don't be yourself, be kind or you are a murderer, because this person is going to commit suicide unless you agree to everything.
Suddenly, a man or a woman needs to feel aroused by the representation of the opposite of their needs and ignore sexual organs.
What can possibly go wrong?
(butyoucantedit)
I wonder what would happen if lesbians just started openly and happily "indentifying" as vagina fetishists. Cos you're not allowed to ~kink shame, right? Of course I think I know what would happen...
(unfeelingzeal)
"Trans women are women and if lesbians are not attracted to female penises they are not able to love all women, thus they are not true lezbians,"
i'm a bi guy and that's what a trans mod and a trans member over on a sub that shall not be named said to me, in a topic literally asking what the difference was between pan- and bisexuals. i said i'm only attracted to cis men and women and basically got attacked for saying that's bullshit because "you can't tell" who's trans and who's not.
please, get real. not even a majority of trans people are passing.
i've left that community because they're extremely toxic to anything outside of their extremely narrow definitions of sexuality. according to them, i'm either a fake bisexual, a wrong bisexual or i'm a flat out bigot. umk.
(the_lonliest_shibe)
I wouldn't say that your partner "became a woman". Even with all the surgery in the world he will never be a woman - he'll never have a uterus or get pregnant or have XX chromosomes.
I think it's more apt to say that your male partner has decided to imitate a woman, and it's perfectly understandable to not be attracted to the female form if you are straight. Theres nothing that's going to change that and people who try and change your mind on that are delusional. If i tell a straight guy "oh just try being with a man, you could learn to enjoy it" I will get (rightly) yelled at because I'm trying to pressure someone into changing their views and preferences. Yet men do it to us all the time..
I'm a lesbian and I regularly get pressured to date TIMs or men. What TIMs do not understand though is that I'm attracted to women. Not men dressed as women. Breasts and a womanly form are just one aspect of that - I'm also attracted to someone who has gone through the same struggles as I have and has the same out look on the world. And you can never change that with surgery or medicine...
(hostabunch)
Just. More. Male. Bullshit.
Do you really think a gay man is going to keep a partner who doesn't have a penis anymore?
(ChewMyMeatForYou)
As a bisexual, I want to clear something up. I'm not just attracted to both men and women because of their appearance. Universally, confidence is seen as attractive. (Not cockiness or attention-seeking, just pure IamwhoIam confidence.) There are definitely people I meet who are typically attractive, yet lacking confidence, or worse, having too much confidence and too little education.
I have yet to meet a trans person that doesn't place their personal comfort aside or has enough self-esteem to have an awkward-free interaction. If I can't eat a meal with you as a friend, without you doing something that makes me uncomfortable, I'm never going to date you. That goes for the straight men, or gay women I'm interested in.
Living a lie of this is what men sound and look like or vice versa, is exhaustive. Being GNC myself, having PTSD, that's enough work for me to manage navigating life without conflict. Why would I take on someone else's self-esteem conflict, to enhance my life? I'm an adult. It is my responsibility to help myself, not save others.
(LittleOwl12)
AGPs need their long term partners to stick around because for the part, they are unappealing. If not flat out repulsive. One guy on Tumblr braved the storm and explained why he never transitioned: the Uncanny Valley. He rightly pointed out that trying to pretend to resemble something you clearly are not is creepy.
(Babyorlaith123)
I think repulsive is a bit of a strong word but I do agree most transgender people don't pass from my experience (and I've met a LOT due to liberal acquaintances). Usually TIFs don't look the slightest but manly and TIMs are quite ugly and unappealing. Doesn't make them bad people but yeah.
(LittleOwl12)
No, it doesn't make them bad people but I stand by the word repulsive. Some of them really are disconcerting to look at, especially the huge older men squeezing into clothes meant for teenage girls.
I'm not using that word out of spite and I know it's a strong one, but I think it's important for people to understand why transition very rarely "works" the way you want it to.
(Cineezyy)
I’d say repulsive is pretty accurate tbh
(Bananastic)
> okay if someone's straight they're NOT going to stay romantically or sexually attracted to someone who's transitioning to be female
?
Male can't transition to be female. They are still males, some of them decide to use hormones or cosmetic surgery to look more like women, some don't and identify as "butch" transwomen or say they don't have to change anything to be a woman.
You could perfectly still be attracted to a trans woman as a straight woman. The problem is if they physically transition as i suppose you are like most of us both attracted to primary and secondary sex characterisitics in people.
(georgiaokeefesgrotto)
The one woman I know that this happened to stayed in the relationship (last I knew) but told me once that it was like there it was like there was another woman and that woman was more important to him.
It doesn't get better, you did the right thing. You are right as well that women don't generally find the 'new woman' attractive.
My family doctor has mentioned and warned me about some baby crazy women digging used condoms out of the trash and inserting it into themselves. Between being falsely accused and that, I'm scared as hell in going into adulthood as a guy.
Since no one here is talking about the latest False Flag, I decided to do my own reading. BOTH the shooter's parents WORK FOR THE GOVERNMENT. Same shit, different story. Gotta change the Drudge headlines to get the focus of McShitStain!
the shooter's father worked for NASA, and his mother, who has a PhD in toxicology, worked for the US Food and Drug Administration.
Dad works for NASA.
Mom works for FDA.
One of the gamers to defeat Katz in the tournament told ActionNewsJax that Katz was acting 'weird'
The gamer said that when he beat Katz on Saturday in the pool round, he tried to shake his hand, but that Katz just stared blankly.
Link to quoted DailyMail article
Just from the pictures, the kid looks to have mild autism/asperger.
Just like the Stoneman Douglas shooting kid.
Easy to take advantage of and manipulate.
This screams MK ULTRA.
[Comment under "Male escort exposes 36 actively gay priests in a file sent to Vatican containing erotic Whatsapp messages and photos. The allegations were compiled by a gay male escort who told local media he couldn’t put up with the priests’ "hypocrisy" any longer."]
Sad that a gay prostitute has more integrity than priests, who are supposed to be men of God. There was a time when such disgusting embarrassments to the holy priesthood would have been burned at the stake. Not saying that we should go back to that punishment . . . but I can see why it was once thought appropriate.
Why the fuck is that disgusting niglet mounting the shoulders of that old white libtard? What an absolute fucking stupid cunt, he sees his family lineage passed down to him from a hundred thousand years of selective breeding destroyed by his retarded grandkids, presumably from OP's sister laying down with dirty nigger beasts and OP gloats about it. Fucking disturbing to no end. Now his grandfather has to deal with a fucking STD-riddled grandchild and a niglet, and he chooses to be happy over it. Dumb shit. Stupid liberals here are prancing about it, hoping they get fucked up the ass by niggers as well.
