All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
Re: I love it when Tumblr Feminists and the usual suspects say men won't help themselves. These young guys from #MENchester raise money for Male DV Victims, and their children.
(BlueOrange22)
Anti-MRA employs classic manipulative tactics- first they say the MRM isn't necessary because feminism "helps men to." But then, when you point out the things feminists do that hurt men (gendered DV laws, etc) or the issues they ignore (conscription), they say "oh, well feminism isn't about men."
(fyrie)
Feminists falsely claim feminism is also about men
When men need help feminism ignores the issue
When men help themselves feminism purposefully try and negate the effort
(armaadi)
Then they say, "if you care so much about men, do something about it". Then they get ticked off at MRAs for doing something about it..
(89peters)
Australia hosted the first ever large MRA rally a few days ago. Hundreds of men and women attended. Subjects discussed included the demonization of men, discrimination against boys in school, discrimination against male victims of domestic violence, and the importance of recognizing that males and females should not be at war with each other; nature designed us to be symbiotic. If you harm men you harm women, and if you harm women you harm men. That was the message.
How did feminists respond?
They organized a "counter-march" and tried to drown out the speakers using megaphones and inane chants. One of the chants was "Racist sexist anti-queer, MRA's not welcome here!" This suggests that they haven't even bothered to study the men's rights movement. Anti-gay and racist sentiment are vanishingly rare in the MRM. Ditto misogyny. Many MRAs, including myself, used to consider themselves feminists until they looked at the hard data. I oppose feminism precisely because I support gender equality.
The woman who organized the men's march down under is indeed right wing. She's a Trump supporter. I'm more of a "radical leftist" type, the kind of person Jordan Peterson warns you about. But you know what? I don't fucking care if she is right wing. The rally was non-partisan, and the speakers discussed important issues that most leftists are currently ignoring or attempting to justify.
We cannot continue to pretend as though feminism is a movement for gender equality. It more closely resembles a hate movement. I would not be surprised at all if, within 20 years or so, feminists are regarded in the same way we now regard the Ku Klux Klan.
(Fortnite_FaceBlaster)
Yea, people call me an "MRA" in a negative fashion, as if that's supposed to dismiss anything I have to say.
(armaadi)
They think if they dismiss you as a person they dont have to defend their arguments.
(LEGALinSCCCA)
This is how one "always wins". It's basically the terroristic way of dealing with life. And it causes cognitive dissonance to an extreme. Because they know they're wrong. But refuse to accept it. Which makes them dig in.
(PeonSupreme)
Feminists disrupt, impede and interfere with men’s efforts to form communities amongst themselves, separate and apart from women. They mistakenly believe a weak man poses less of a threat than a strong one.
[Under thread "Slavery yay or nay?"]
@ImALivingJoke
@NationalUnity2001
National Socialism is the belief that every race should have a homeland and that every people should be in their homeland. You can't have an ethno-state if half your country is slaves of another race. National Socialists do not support slavery. No one who wants to be taken seriously does. What an absurd question to ask on a sub for intellectual discussion.
I'm not a National Socialist, by the way.But the Nazis enslaved countless numbers of people in the course of the war.
How can you say that Nazism opposes slavery when we have evidence they actively enslaved people?@LivefromPhoenix
@GreatEmuWarVeteran
@LivefromPhoenix
@GreatEmuWarVeteran
conscription =/= slavery. Plenty of British colonials were conscripted against their will, no one calls that slavery.
Maybe because they were paid and weren't forced to stay in the British military forever?
Huh, the Germans only resorted to using prisoners and conscripts from occupied countries towards the end of the war, they certainly weren't planning on using them forever lol.
The Nazi government mandated massive indefinite compulsory service as early as the late 1930s and began the process of using prisoners of war and civilian "undesirables" from occupied territories in 1942 at the latest (hardly 'towards the end of the war').
they certainly weren't planning on using them forever lol
I guess you're right in a roundabout way, Nazi administrators planned on working their slaves to death.
Posted by AHAPPYMERCHANT:
from occupied territories in 1942 at the latest (hardly 'towards the end of the war').
You're retarded. The war was over by mid to late 1942 and it was only a matter of time. From that point onward, Germany had crippling manpower shortages that necessitated they use slaves in order to keep war production high enough to succeed. They had no choice.
Aboriginals have zero presence and power here. There are no more 100%, full-blooded aboriginals anymore so technically they are already extinct.
To me, that's plenty evidence of a weak people that only managed to develop a weak culture. They're lucky that they lived in Australia in isolation. If they were in any other continent, they would have been wiped out and forgotten in history already.
Even now, they are content with just getting a few hundred dollars off welfare every week, no motivation to achieve more. Meanwhile Asians work their asses off.
Lastly, yes I'm aware of Jessica Mauboy or other aboriginals who went to achieve things. One of my rental properties are located where there's a sizable concentration of Aboriginals, actually. Needless to say, it is not a good neighbourhood.
Aboriginals failed to defend their territory against pinkies, and they lost their land. And now pinkies are losing their land due to economic war. All is fair.
If you think that you can just sit on a piece of land and not have defensive capabilities to defend intruders then you deserve to have that land taken away.
People are naturally racist. We've tried multiculturalism for hundreds of years, it simply doesn't work.
Actually yes. Stories of Asians coming to Australia with $100 in their pocket and ending up with 10 properties after 30 years is all too common. Aboriginals get hundreds of dollars every week from the government and they cannot even get a property.
I don't understand why you would rather leave Australia to the aboriginals when Asians are on the verge of taking over the whole continent.
Do you think that if we play nice, others will?
I'm saying that aboriginals are like pandas. They survive only because we let them.
Chicago Tribune Article Today: "'Prison is not where women need to be': All-female task force wants to cut Illinois’ female prison population in half"
(JStheHammer)
“Prisons were made for men, and they are made to traumatize,” said Celia Colon"
(lostapwbm)
“Prisons were made for men, and they are made to traumatize,” said Celia Colon, who teared up after sharing with the group her history of abuse. “They were not made for healing.”
Traumatizing men is perfectly acceptable. Traumatizing women (who got to prison by traumatizing others) is not acceptable because...women are equal to men?
“Prison is not where women need to be,” said Benedict, a partner on the National Resource Center on Justice Involved Women, funded by the U.S. Department of Justice. “Even if prisons were highly functional places, they don’t belong there. It’s a train wreck, to be honest, a train wreck.”
If women commit felonies, then prison is exactly where they need to be. As a matter of fact, women commit felonies and gynocentric judges and prosecutors often REFUSE to send them to prison.
Margaret Byrne, an attorney who for 35 years has represented countless women who fought back against abusers, agreed. Many women call 911 to report the violent crime they’ve just committed on a partner, Byrne said, but they fail at proving the difficult self-defense theory in court.
Probably because you can't 'self-defense' a man while he's sleeping, or when his back is turned, or when he's not presenting an immediate and credible threat.
By the time she was 16 and living in South Chicago, Colon had drifted into gang life, drawn by its offer of support — and guns for protection.
“I saw a lot of hurt and bloodshed,” Colon, 42, told the other women gathered at the first meeting. “Things that are never gonna be erased. It does irreversible damage.”
You mean you validated cholos and gangbangers by giving them pussy.
Those who insist that they cannot be held responsible for their own actions, that they are merely leaves floating along the winds of economic circumstances, ore are victims of societal programming, should not enjoy the right to affect or influence public policy or the use of public money.
(HeForeverBleeds)
I've got a long list of articles where people try to argue for female criminals getting lenient sentences or no jail on the basis of being female. A long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long list. I guess this one can be added
I think part of why it's such a popular idea is because gynocentrism is prevalent in both of the main ideologies. Feminism says females are always the oppressed victim to the point where even female criminals are truly the victims and therefore prison is "victimizing" them again. Traditionalism stereotypes women as helpless, innocent, childlike, and basically too weak to be a threat; therefore she's not really responsible for any crime she commits
Both tend to perceive women as morally superior. Both tend to perceive the well-being of the female in any given situation (whether she's the victim or the perpetrator) as more important and more worthy or in need of being protected
(fractureegg)
Yep. And proof of your argument can be found from a statement made a hundred years ago by Chicago attorney Agnes McHugh. In 1906 she said, “A man-jury will not convict a woman murderer in this county, if the prosecutor is a man. I think this leniency may be traced to the chivalry latent in every man.”
Turns out that having a female prosecutor or judge or females on the jury doesn't make any difference.
I don't have any stats handy but it's possible that female accountability vis a vis the justice system has actually grown over the past few decades. In patriarchies the main female "sin" is adultery, which is often severely punished; but they get away with pretty much everything else. (In some primitive fundamentalist religious societies, "witchcraft" is also severely punished).
But I guess it was inevitable that after a brief flirtation with the idea of treating women as semi-adults, feminists wouldn't be able to resist exploiting gynocentrism to increase their privileges even more. But women are still supposed to be treated like equals somehow. Zero logic or sense of justice, as usual.
(VantagePoint2018)
Generally, people look at the motives and background of female criminals whereas they just assume male criminals are uniquely evil.
(Razorbladekandyfan)
This is why we need a mens movement.
"people like yourself are an embattled minority" So you're a non-white minority in a country that has an indigenous white population. And you scream because, deep down, you feel guilty about it.
Are you so different than a colonist? What's wrong with the dozens of countries where you are a statistical majority or plurality? Why aren't you there?
Oh, and as for your other garbage about this being about "white supremacy" (lol, yes whites are SUPREME...in Britain and France -where they are indigenous - just like Chinese are SUPREME in China) mass immigration is most definitely part of a collapsing civilization. It's really the replacement of the existing civilization with another one. So, yes, it's collapse. Too bad you like living in a European civilization. Won't be there much longer.
Re: Where Does Organized Male Evil Come From?
I just got finished reading this article about the rapes of Rohingya women and the persecution and slaughter of their people: http://www.thejournal.ie/rohingya-rape-3745266-Dec2017/
I know it's not uplifting to read this stuff, but it's also important not to turn away.
I want to know what causes such organized male evil. It doesn't matter whether it's a dispute over territory or religion or ethnicity, it is men who do this in an organized fashion. It has always been men.
Is it as simple as "patriarchy?" Silvia Federici's Caliban and the Witch describes the creation of capitalist evil through the weaponization of men and male sexuality, the formal institution of patriarchy, the enslavement of women, and the colonial/imperial ventures of the new world order.
Although it's true almost no corner of the human world has gone untouched by the Western project of colonialism and imperialism, other cultures have their own ancient histories of warfare, bloodshed and male rule that predate Western history.
I know the advent of agriculture and the dawn of land ownership have been cited as the reason for growing institutionalization of patriarchy and subjugation of women and expansion of territory--but really--I struggle to understand how men can commit such horrific atrocities in an organized fashion. If women ruled the world, would we do this? Would we?
I have never given much credence to notions of biological determinism and I still don't; if men are like this by dint of nature as well as nurture the power of human socialization can change them. So far is has mainly been used to cement these violent, hierarchical tendencies it seems.
I just never used to believe there could be this fundamental difference between men and women where under the right circumstances men could join together to commit such atrocities in a way that women wouldn't. Is it because women have been stripped of their power that we don't see them band together to exercise it in such horrific fashion? Or is there really a fundamental, biological difference between us that makes men more susceptible to committing violence?
I also struggle with the connection between sex and committing violence so often seen within cultures and among mostly male individuals across the world. Is it male or is it masculine?
(anxietyaccount8)
No it's not just as simple as patriarchy. I once believed that but now I don't. Men really are just more violent than women. Male sexuality is also very different than female sexuality (in general) and I don't think anybody could have socialized me into being interested in some of the crazy things they are interested in.
I think that the reason a lot of people dismiss these claims is because they are reminded of evolutionary psychology, which for the most part is not very scientific at all. But the thing is that just because things like "women are naturally better at cooking" are BS it doesn't mean that everything that sounds like evopsych is wrong. For example we know that male and female animals act differently. We know that males and females have different body types, hormone levels, and different ways of reproducing. Would it really be so insane to suggest there are mental differences too?
Now to be fair, I am not really sure if this is true, and none of us will be sure unless we have substantial evidence, but this is my personal theory. It just feels really obvious to me.
(Unabashed_Calabash)
This was my point to another poster. To what extent can the behavior of other mammals, including our closest relatives chimpanzees and bonobos (pygmy chimpanzees) be interpreted to reflect on our own?
Not only the male correlation of sex and violence but specifically the far greater incidence of male sexual fetishes (about the same as the disproportionate ratio of male vs. female violence, 10 to 1) causes me to believe there's something more than socialization going on here. Scientists who study human sexuality say it has to do with a more intense focus from males as a group on sexuality in general, heightening fetishes. But how often do you hear of women who like to pretend to be baby boys and wear diapers? (Seriously?) And like to be burped and breastfed and rocked to sleep? (I would really like formal studies of how often these bizarre fetishes occur in males as compared to females. I wouldn't necessarily say it's a result of porn and therefore male domination arising from social reasons because how much of porn is men pretending to be infant girls and breastfeed? Please don't tell me).
I am not saying this to be in favor of gender or against it. "Gender" as we know it is a social construct. Any innate evolutionary differences in the sexes--say, of violent vs. pacifist, or systematizing (from, say, hunting more often than women in most prehistoric societies) vs. integration (from the greater social relations of gathering and building)--need not be our fate if detrimental. We are highly social animals almost entirely at the whim of our socialization, which has been civilizing in some respects but in others greatly lacking.
I agree that just because evolutionary psychology has become a crutch of sexist males it does not mean absolutely none of it is true. It's more important than ever we separate the wheat from the chaff.
(anxietyaccount8)
Right, and it's important that people recognize radical feminism's criticism of gender actually does not contradict this existence of innate differences. We are all born into a society where we have to follow prescribed gender roles, and this social construct bleeds into all aspects of our lives and causes differences of its own. If some differences are innate this social construction makes them much more prominent and worse.
Also it doesn't mean that there is a distinct male or female brain, or that trans people really do have the brain of the opposite sex. Even if, hypothetically, a trans woman did actually act in ways that women are biologically supposed to, they are just proving that there is variation and a male can be that way too.
(Unabashed_Calabash)
Lol at the downvotes. I also don't understand how butthurt men get about this subject. It is quite clearly true (unless you prefer "violence" to "evil" because you don't believe in imposing moral values on human actions), and I am merely asking why and where it comes from.
Humanity will never change until men reckon with their own and their fellow men's actions.
(bigoltreehugger)
Ew. So many men came in caping for other men in response. I miss the days when this sub didn't have as many dudes hanging around. I'm sorry I can't engage your question properly but I just wanted to say that I've always appreciated your input on this sub.
(descending_wisdom)
fundamental biological differences. Sexual selection theory easily explains male violence. Watch some videos on organized warfare in some troops of chimpanzees.
(sunscreenonface)
Gonna leave this write up from notcisjustwoman here:
"Patriarchy pre-dates both the agricultural revolution and hunter-gatherer societies, because the basis of the oppression of women, indeed the very basis for oppression itself, is rape.
Male animals have been raping female animals since before the first humans, or even the first primates, appeared on earth. Events like the agricultural revolution codified male oppression of women into a more organized system, and religion has evolved over time to become an enforcer and moralizer of male violence, but neither of things things created patriarchy. Patriarchy began the first time a man raped a woman, and instead of being beaten to death by her tribal/family group, he was rewarded with fathership of her children.
It’s not comfortable even for most radical feminists to see this full and complete scope of the history of patriarchy, because it means that things are much more complicated than mere socialization, but it is a brutal truth we must confront in our analysis."
To expand upon this, here's a previous write up I did once I'd read notcisjustwoman's blog:
"I don't think this will make anyone feel better, but I've recently been thinking a lot about the various species of animals across this earth that have been known to rape...and it turns out most animal species have some form of rape. Ducks, squirrels, dolphins, dogs, gorillas, etc. all have observable males who rape and aggress females.
I don't think it's a stretch to say that aggressive males who rape will pass on their aggressive traits to their offspring that are conceived via rape. I don't think it's a stretch to say that male homo sapiens might be more likely to aggress and rape females since they inherited a tendancy towards violence from their male ancestors who were conceived via rape. (Reminder: I could be completely wrong about this!)
Does this make rape ok? NO!!!! Even if rape and aggressive sexual behavior is 'natural', 'natural' does not instantly equal something good or beneficial for a species. Homo sapiens dying of tooth decay at 22 is quite natural, but it's horrific and traumatizing for everyone involved.
All I'm saying is my understanding of men's GLOBAL and CONSTANT violence toward women became easier to understand once I started to think about sexual violence as an issue often found in primate species and not as something completely 100% culturally-bound.
Here's a link to a tumblr write-up that spawned my thoughts on this: http://notcisjustwoman.tumblr.com/post/175761393959/what-is-good-for-the-gander-is-not-always-good-for#notes
(Unabashed_Calabash)
I've read about the extremely complex history of rape among animals of all kinds (they have highly evolved methods of rape--an actual sexual arms race between males and females, as females also evolved to try to avoid rape--in fact, some believe the reason we walk upright is because women first stood up to avoid greater vulnerability to gang rape from behind, and that these gang rapes were so violent many of the females of our prehistoric ancestors who did not stand up did not survive). The species in which pair-bonding and good fatherhood are the norm are not the norm.
There's a reason that male sperm in all species is a complex chemical cocktail. In humans it's designed to lull/drug the mate and bond females to males even at their own expense.
My gut feeling and experiences tell me notjustciswoman is right.
There's a reason rape as committed by men is so normalized and also so easy for men to commit. Behavioral scientists have discussed the not-so-mythical "rape switch" and posited that all or most men have one.
Reading stories of men's mass raiding/raping parties, I'm inclined to agree. (My own experience aligns with this as well. I have actually witnessed a man struggle with his own desire to rape when confronted with a woman highly vulnerable to it. He had a low "rape threshold" certainly, but I don't actually think it's all that unusual. I think human men--because human beings can feel remorse and regret--may struggle with what they have done or the harm they have caused, if society or the victim force them to reflect on this, but they still did it and wanted to do it anyway). Neither the normalization of rape nor its prevalence despite official messages all over the world that it's wrong would be so common if rape were not somehow natural to the males of this species.
I remember an author saying "we cannot deal with violence until we admit uncomfortable truths, such as the thrill of war." The same is true of rape/sexual abuse; there's no way we can combat it without understanding it, and understanding why some men like to do it even when it's officially discouraged, or why men as a class can be easily encouraged to commit it under the right circumstances, is, I think, important if we ever hope to combat it.
(And yes, the history of conquest and invasion in our species is the history of rape. There's a reason so many men in the world carry the same Y chromosome).
Re: Cultures that have ‘third genders’ don’t prove transgenderism is either ubiquitous or progressive
(LittleOwl12)
There's a lot of "noble savage" romanticism in trans ideology. They don't respect these cultures enough to learn anything in depth about them. They just want what they want out of it,
(baremon7)
It looks more like a barbaric practice of mainly men that don't embrace a sexist toxic form of masculinity to set them apart from women, but see themselves as non-men. it is enforced in the hierarchy of a male system.
Women that don't feel like women can just be killed by their family.
(lefterfield)
That's been my conclusion from reading about the vast majority of third gender cultures. It's infuriating when libfems try to justify transgenderism with it, when it's clear they know nothing about the practices or the cultures.
(LumpyTrust)
And how many of these "third genders" treated the person as a member of the opposite sex? Unless they were treated identically to members of the opposite sex, it's not comparable to modern trans.
They say "Transwomen are women", not "transwomen are a third category/transwomen are a category of biological males".
(Elle_Ciel)
Having extra genders doesn't make any sense unless the culture already had a rigid gender role binary. Not to mention the implication that being gay or GNC makes you a less valid or valuable member of your sex so you get tossed into the "non-man" category. None of these cultures viewed GNC men the same as actual women, and certainly not the same as being biologically female. Were they even allowed to have relationships or marriages with other men? Just because this is better than how they'd be treated in most cultures influenced by Abrahamic religions, that doesn't mean all these tribes lived in progressive, queer-affirming, sex-positive intersectional feminist utopias. /eyeroll?
I'm no anthropologist so feel free to chime in with any evidence to the contrary, but it seems like a lot of "third genders" are just for males. What did they do with the lesbians or transmen?
(womenopausal)
Married off and repeatedly impregnated is my guess.
Males should never work as gynecologists or anything with female exclusive health issues
Excuse my language but I'm so fucking furious I just want to scream out loud. I saw a post on Facebook where a woman described what she had to go through at the gynecologist. This is what she wrote
I was at an gynecological examination for an abortion, the nurse had a male apprentice with her. I was too afraid to say anything even though I felt uncomfortable. During the exam he put two fingers inside of me like the nurse already did meanwhile he asks "is it okay if I also examine you by the way". When I said no he laughed at me and said "well, now it's too late". I felt so humiliated and little.
Now tell me, why the fuck do we even allow men to work as or study to gynecologists? Considering how men are socialised, it's a very strange career choice for a man and I can't help to think that there is ALWAYS a ulterior move behind. I heard so many horror stories from women who had appointments with male gynecologists where they flirted or made comments about their vagina, in other words, sexual harassment. How the fuck are we supposed to feel safe with male gynecologists?! My first appointment with a gynecologist was also really horrible, he was extremely rude and he asked me if I ever had sex, when I said yes he said that then I shouldn't be afraid of the exam since I already been penetrated. When I told him that I only had sex with women he said that it doesn't count and that I am a virgin. It is first now I realise that this was just extremely creepy and whether I had PIV sex or not had NOTHING to do with my current problems at the time!!!
Also, why the fuck should men who don't have any idea what it's like to be a woman, who have never felt period cramps so painful that you just lay in a fetal position on your bed crying, work with treating women who have endometrios? Women with endometrios are almost never even taken serious by male doctors, I heard so many horror stories from women here as well who just heard that they should go home, put a warm wheat pillow on their stomach and take an aspirin (which also leads me to the question if these men are really this stupid or just do this because they enjoy the fact that women feel pain).
Men should not be allowed to work in healthcare with female exclusive issues! I hope I'm not alone thinking this.
Re: On how trans-identified men don't care about women or better the feminist movement in any tangible way
(Moonpriestes)
Like a nice little libfem, I used to think that men could be feminists. But it all falls apart when you stop looking at men as individuals and start looking at them as a group.
Men oppressed women for thousands of years based on biological sex. They STILL oppress women based on biological sex. But suddenly, because men see something that women have that they can't have, womanhood is redefined to be based on feelings.
Why do we need to respect men's feelings? Were they respecting women's feelings for the centuries where we weren't allowed to vote, own property, or have bodily autonomy? Do they respect women's feelings now?
(veronalady)
If all this was happening a hundred years ago, they'd have complained about the women's suffrage movement being "exclusionary" because THEY were allowed to vote.
(ukbe2025)
This is why it pisses me off when they use women’s issues (infertility, lack of periods) as a trump card to prove their non-existent arguments. Have they ever raised awareness for infertile women? Or spoken about the stigma women face when they are unable to conceive? When women’s issues are spoken about, they try to make it about them. Look at the abortion debate in Ireland, when TRAs were more upset that the campaign included the word “women” than the fact a woman in Ireland could go to PRISON for having bodily autonomy.
Peak trans-ing so hard right now.
I've commented on here a bit while I've been trying to figure out what I really think. I tried accepting the trans thing, I really did. I was even down with the idea that trans women are women, just not female. But I've had it. I just visited r/terfisaslur, and urgh I've just had it with;
The narcissism. The attempt to escape criticism for bad typically male behaviour. The desire to reinforce the misogynistic sexual caricature of a woman. The drama seeking. The victimhood mentality. The demand to cross women's boundaries. The homophobia and misogyny towards lesbians. The complete disregard for biological fact. The complete disregard for any question/criticism. The complete disregard for how changing your sex legally completely skews any data on violence predominantly perpetrated by men against women. A big fucking deal in my opinion. And the god damn new speak.
So hello, I'm officially on your side as of right now.
Re: Misandry in Action: 'Feminist' Lana 'Aborts Baby Because It's A Boy' And Is Surprised By Backlash
(TheImpossible1)
It's not fake news, but it is old news. She might still be a piece of shit even, but going back a few years to find headlines isn't changing hearts and minds.
It's proof that back then feminists did this. The suspicion was right.
They've escalated the hatred so much in the last 3 years that I guarantee this is common practice among feminist human shit.
(RacelessSexlessName)
There is the question of what is a men's rights position on gender selective abortion?
Is it acceptable to demand financial abortion without considering the complexities of social imbalance?
The answer to that question is simple. The gender of the child doesn't matter, it should still be a mans choice whether he wants to be a part of that life or not, inclusive of financial and legal obligation. No matter how you dice the 'abortion' issue between the genders, the man in all current scenarios is a slave to some woman he probably didn't want a child with.
Re: US-backed Saudi regime set to behead female activist and four others (Hint: the 4 others are men)
(my_name_is_gato)
Shhh, male victims don't count. /s
(Littleknight)
Men get beheaded all the time. Borrring /s
(my_name_is_gato)
But lets shed a tear for the wives, mothers, sisters, and daughters who lost someone.
(MRAConfessor)
Last year, Saudi Arabia executed 144 men and 2 women.
?
In Iran, it was 501 men and 6 women.
(afqradeon)
Shit hole countries
(mwobuddy)
Fucking hell. This is normalized violence against men but women, oh hell naw!
Re: Fertility in Europe: If the woman wants to have a baby and the man disagrees, the likelihood is only about one-third compared to when the couple agrees. If it is the man who wants the baby and the woman disagrees, the probability of having a child is indistinguishable from zero.
(xNOM)
Holy crap. There are a few condom users but I don't really see any other explanation other than at least 1/3 of women lie about birth control.
(TheImpossible1)
If they agree, they agree.
If the woman doesn't want to carry a child to term, I hope we can all agree the chances of her doing so should approach zero.
So is the 1/3 when the man disagrees the problem? And would some sort of paternal opt-out option be an agreeable remedy?
No, a jail sentence for the woman for trapping the man as well as an opt out would be acceptable.
She should also have to pay damages.
Or just be force opted out of taking child support from the father, ever.
Not good enough. They've been abusing the law, we should do it back.
"I as a male am traumatized by the lack of trust and care shown by my partner in doing this to me, it has affected my mental state severely"
I think damages are more than fair considering the mental effects of having this kind of thing happen to you.
If he has an opt-out, he has no basis for "damages." I actually favor that as a legal choice.
What your proposing basically lets men press charges and sue women for getting the women pregnant. That's...got too many problems to even really tackle.
Not really, it brings things back to being equal.
They should pay emotional distress damages equal to child support for 18 years as well as all the other consequences.
It's basically just what happens to men now, but reversed.
I think it's perfect. Everything should just be reversed, let's see how women like the "equality" they promote when they're suffering it.
That's not only obviously unfair, it takes everything people fear about false rape allegations and puts it into the extreme. It's hard for me not to think this is actually just some idea of getting revenge on women for that issue.
Even if we put all of that aside, the nominal purpose of child support is to support the child. You're now putting the kid in a position where they're stuck with a parent whom you're rendering broke by virtue of essentially the same legal mechanism designed to make sure they're provided for.
That you think that's "perfect" kind of makes it seem like you're missing the most important part of the whole equation: the welfare of the kids themselves.
It's funny how much you don't like your hypocrisy pushed back at you.
Feminism thinks "we'll push for as much injustice as we can, if we lose they won't do it back, they'll just make it equal"
It's funny how women selectively care about a child's welfare when it suits them. You sure didn't care when you wrote the Tender Years crap.
"my child needs money for its welfare"
proceeds to buy handbags and makeup
Even now, you divorce good men who've done nothing wrong, and we've all seen how single mother kids turn out :)
If you cared about the child's welfare you wouldn't be supportive of the system as it is now.
Plus how many women actually use the child support money on the child?
What is the "tender years crap"? For that matter, who is the "you" that you're speaking to?
Yeah, it's not like kids cost money or anything. You want to talk about radical change to the system including a more robust public safety net to provide for kids whose parents are dirt poor in exchange for eliminating child support? Sure. I'm down.
But it kind of seems like you're talking to someone else entirely right now.
It's amazing how feminists have a selective memory of what their movement has done.
That would be the idea that women should have full custody of a child during their "tender years" up to 4. This was banned as it contradicted the 14th Amendment but was then rebranded as "best interest of the child" still giving heavy bias to the mother (despite what we know about children raised by only a mother)
You as in feminist lower than dirt "activists" that claim to be doing what's right despite mounting evidence that what you're doing will result in societal collapse when everyone gives up on women.
I don't support any social programs. They're just a way to send men's tax money to women.
That all sounds well and good. But what incentive do 2nd and 3rd worlders have to reduce birthing rates when they can outbreed the first worlders and take over by sheer numbers and exploitation of the former judeo-christian rooted moral compass of first world nations?
Re: Chinese led infrastructure projects in Africa get delayed because the Congolese frequently take time off from work to dance or play sports after receiving their paycheques
"For the people in Congo, the goal of work is to rest." Hmm maybe they are right about this part who knows.
That’s short sighted Sub Saharan retardation.
East Asian mindset, “The goal of work is to take the burden of the next generation.”
How's that working out?
East Asia has Hong Kong Macau Taiwan Japan South Korea China. All 10000x more developed than Sub Saharan Africa even in just a few decades after war. It has and will always will be more developed because of this very mentality. So yes it worked out just fine.
But please keep encouraging them to keep up this behavior and they’ll never develop. You’re part of the reason they’re poor. You don’t have the spine to tell them the truth about their culture and mindset.
Soon libfems will begin selectively aborting fetuses with vaginas and exalting fetuses with penises, in the name of progress.
But you will be ostracized when you call it sexism or misogyny because “biology doesn’t mean it was a girl or female, you bigoted TERF.”
You think I’m crazy, but it’s already happened before.
Arab societies used to bury baby girls as soon as they were born. We all know Asian societies killed baby girls as well.
People try to tell us that it’s because “women weren’t as valued” which is true, but have you ever thought about it deeper than that?
The truth is that these societies were at PEAK liberalism.
Men are offended by the existence of women. Always have been, always will be. At peak progressiveness men kill off women, the more innocent the girl the better, and no one is more innocent than a baby.
Being born a female is literally a CRIME in the male psyche. Most women do not know or understand this. It’s why men hate us. Because we are born female.
That sounds too weak. If my kid became gay I would lock them into the closet, no food, no water etc until they learn how to behave. Originally solitary confinement proved very effective against fags in mental hospitals but thanks to the liberals you can't do that anymore so you have to take matters into your own hands.
These are the words to come out of her cousin's mouth after an illegal murdered Mollie. As you know, Mollie Tibbetts was anti-white herself, so her death could be considered karmic retribution. Some people, even here, feel "sorry" for her, despite what she said, and I notice that some people on the right are trying to use her as a "martyr", the problem is that unlike most times were this happens, her entire family is completely fucked in the head and are just as far left as her daughter. This isn't the first time it happened, there is the case with Amy Biehl, and if you do not know what that is, I suggest you read the wiki article on her, but you won't like what you're gonna read. The fact that her own family is actively shitting on their own flesh and blood by defending her murderer for being brown is so intrinsically repulsive that no matter how they try to frame it, they do such a good job dehumanizing themselves.
In fact, I think of instead of saying "look at Mollie Tibbetts, stop illegal immigration", it might actually be a good idea to highlight her family reaction to basically highlight just how barbaric pro-immigration and illegal sentiments really are. Its a powerful emotional angle. That only WE truly care about her fate, that only WE care to prevent this from happening again, not her own family. In fact, the whole story is just bad enough that you may even make others feel "racial shame", but for good use. The shame that white people like these are part of the same race they belong too.
Anti-white/far left/traitorous whites are a serious problem, but I notice that while this subreddit hates them, no one talks about any approaches to actually deal with them. Some even think that these people can be "reformed", but frankly, once you get to the point where your a-okay with an illegal murdering your daughter, and not seeing the horrific implications of that. You are far long gone, you are irredeemable at that point.
Men lead, women follow. That's all.
Years ago, I had sex with my friend's much younger sister and it set her on a path to becoming a huge slut
Before anything else, let me just give you the story of what happened. I was 16 at the time, so was my friend. Me, the friend, and another girl were at the friend's house and thought we were alone. We were fucking around and watching porn on her computer and laughing about it and shit like that. We came to a video of a girl eating out another girl in front of a whole party. We watched that one for like a half hour and we all thought it was hot. We joked about it and "reenacted it", like not actually eating pussy but licking our shorts and just being stupid like that. Anyway, later that day I was alone with the friend's sister and she told me she was watching us the whole time and she loved it. She told me she wanted us to do what the girls in the video were doing. I guess she asked me cause she knew i was bi and a pretty big slut anyway.
I dont know why exactly, but I was fucking excited about it. I thought it was going to be a lot of fun teaching this girl about licking pussy. So I got some good porn together later and gave it to her and told her to watch it and get comfortable with it and get comfortable with herself and we'd talk later. Apparently she watched that stuff every night for a week and just devoured it. She talked to me a week later and said she had the house to herself for a whole weekend. Her parents, sisters, and brother were all away at different places and her parents were ok leaving her for 2 days alone.
So we had our chance and I came over Saturday at like noon. We watched some of the porn together and talked about it and made sure she was comfortable and excited, and she definitely was. Over the next hour or so we kissed, made out, got naked, and I let her do and look at whatever she wanted. Eventually, she wanted to get her mouth on my pussy and I walked her through how to eat me out. After some coaching, she was able to get me to orgasm and she was so fucking happy. She wanted me to do the same to her and I did for a bit but for some reason couldn't get her to orgasm. Maybe she was just nervous or whatever. It was a crazy day.
After all that, she started the habit of making out with all her girl friends, because it was fun or sexy or for attention or whatever. She loved the attention from boys a little too much and started having sex way more than a girl her age should and she's not slowing down to this day. Her sis still has no idea what turned her sister into a bi slut at that age.
And I didn't mean to leave her age to the end but I just realized i didn't say it. That day was a week before her 12th birthday. Maybe you think I'm a monster or twisted perv right now and fuck maybe I am. I don't know. I feel kinda bad about the whole thing but honestly I think i feel worse about the fact that i don't feel as bad as i should about it. I'm a little worried i'm really messed up and want to hear other people tell me what they think.
The vast majority of men do not want to be involved in a sexual relationship with a child. But more and more young girls are placing themselves in situations of sexual access with older men and rather than coming up with a means to stop these girls from doing this, everyone wants to just blame the men who get caught up in the unfortunate situation.
Based on my personal and real-life experience working in high schools with at-risk children and at anime conventions across the country; for every one guy who is a genuine, dyed-in-the-wool "candy-snatcher," there are two other guys who just got caught in the trick bag by some promiscuous young thing.
Let's be real intellectually honest with each other, okay? It isn't all like "To Catch A Predator" out there. Not all of these girls are telling men that they are 13-15 years old. 15 can look like 21 with little or no effort today, especially with females. It's no longer Tatum O'Neal or Jodie Foster anymore. Miley Cyrus and Lindsey Lohan were teens chasing after older men and nobody thought anything of it or if they did, their viewpoints were patently ignored. The common opinion was that "they were just being girls."
You have countless young girls watching music videos, reading adult erotica, and being told by the mass media that they are sexual beings and that they deserve the right to express that sexuality with any male they choose, including adult men. They are exposed to all of this material and because of this, they do know how to attract and seduce a man of any age. They know how to push those buttons and pull those levers and claiming that they don't is utter denial.
Let's talk "Twilight" for a second. The character of "Edward Cullen" is not a 16-year old heartthrob; he's a 140 year-old man with the face of a 16-year old...but millions of young girls want to be "Bella Swan" not just because Edward is a vampire, but he also represents "the exotic older gentleman who will come and sweep them off of their feet."
But we live in a society that refuses to put these young girls in their place and remind them that they are still children. These young girls (and boys) are in such a rush to be adults and we are doing nothing to slow them down. This isn't only about grown men wanting to fuck little girls; this is also about little girls doing everything in their power to get grown men to fuck them.
Why don't we have more women's groups out there teaching these young girls the truth about their behavior and convincing them that if they truly want to experiment sexually, they need to do so with boys their own age? Instead of investing in education and esteem for these girls, all we do is put stock in blame and shame against the decent men who get caught up in a bad situation.
Here's a riddle: how do you tell the difference between a candy-snatcher and a male victim of underage sexual deception? *
Easy; the male victim is the one who is already in tears about the unfortunate situation before the police show up to arrest him....
ALL WHITE PEOPLE DID NOT VOTE FOR TRUMP. MOST WHITES (CRACKERS TO YOU) THAT I KNOW DONT EVEN LIKE HIM AND THINK HE IS A JOKE. THIS IS THE SAME AS ANY NEGRO WHO THINKS ALL WHITES LIKE TRUMP HAVE A LOW IQ (INTELLIGENCE QUOTIENT). ILL BET THAT THE AVERAGE IQ FOR BLACK PEOPLE IS AT LEAT 20 POINTS BELOW US CRACKERS AVERAGE. yes this is extremely racist and i probably will get kicked off of Facebook but if i see one for more black person dressed exactly like every other black person I'm going to explode. Why are they afriad of being different. Most blacks are just about perfect copies of each other with there clothes cars speech moment and way of thinking. I know you blacks think your so much better because you dumb down the english language, make up new words as a 5 year old child does. don't even get me started on rap. Its the same stupid lyrics over and over in each song just changed slightly. One lyric I heard the other day that was supposed to be a love song was saying "hit it from the back, make you feel comfortable"...... Those words and words like it are destroying our society. Little girls listen to that crap on the pop station radio and subconsciously and conciously are changed into what would've been considered a slut many years ago. Now is mandatory if you want any popularity. Have sex with who you want when you want and as much as possible. i feel sorry for any blackster with poor vision because they are so worried about being exactly like every other black that you will never see one wearing glasses. lol its pitiful. Look at NFL NBA. what color dominates? those sports rely not so much on your mind except quarter back who are most white to do most of the thinking but still backs on average run faster and jump higher. Their phyicall are so amazing its almost like they are a product of selective breading during the slave era but that can't be true look at africa. We see team after team of basketball and football and other sports with a all these super athletes in africa... O wait no we don't its just the american blacks that are the super athletic ones. the slave owners would've never bread the strongest male with hardest working female to produce a fast working and high endurance child slave, that would be nonsense right? no they did selective breading for 500yrs and now we have kobe and jordan etc. show me one native african with half the abilities of jordan or lebron....... I'm waiting. They don't exist. nowhere in the world do blacks exist with the abilities that african americans have.... NOWHERE BUT IN THE US WHERE SELECTIVE BREADING WAS DOCUMENTED AND DEFINITELY PROVEN. Its funny because blacks think they just got lucky or they are the super race. No. If you want to continue to blame me and my generation for slavery (which no black american has been a slave nor has any whites of this generation owned a slave) then after your done blaming us for something we have never seen then also take the time to thank us for your ability to get abs by only walking to your mailbox each month and not working out.
In defense of ephebophilia, or as I call it the way of nature.
Look at any species. Mating begins with the onset of fertility.
That's really all I should have to point out, but because we live in oppressive times where understanding and empathy are scarce, I must resign myself to a more complex explanation.
First, we ephebophiles ARE NOT PEDOPHILES. I will reiterate this as many times as I have to. Pedophiles want to have sex with CHILDREN. As an ephebophile I would NEVER so much as consider having sex with a child.
Now, having sex with a fresh faced, virginal young teen on the other hand... that's another matter entirely. Show me the heterosexual man who claims he never imagines himself slaking his lusts on a tight, fresh, nubile, teenage female, and I will show you a liar.
The hypocrisy is one thing, but what I don't get about society's response to ephebophilia is ya'lls total lack of empathy. Y'know, the reason I'm really drawn to the younger kind has a lot to do with the victimization I've faced as an unattractive, beta INCEL man.
Personally, I suffer from depression, social anxiety, ADHD, and a few other things, and much of that stems from the bullying and misandry I've been a victim of. That's WHY I have to live the way I do. You all would call it immature, though it is anything but. Frankly, I just don't have seem to have much in common with other "adults", with their rabid materialism, consumerism, conformism, alcoholism, and incessant socializing/partying. I've always had more interest in supposedly juvenile (though I feel they can be very mature) activities such as cartoons, anime, playing with/constructing figurines, playing videogames, and just lounging around wasting a day, the way a child does.
I also feel I have the curiousity and innocence of a much younger person, I love reading wikipedia and learning about the world. You all haven't succeded in stamping any of that OUT of me, even though, lord knows you've all tried. These things don't make me immature, but they make me more empathetic towards younger people, because I can feel what it's like for them not fitting into this cruel adult world.
But do any of you pause to consider my richness and depth as a human being? NO. You just label me a pervert, pedo, and other bullying slurs -- which by the way aren't accurate, because I'm not a pedophile -- and move on.
Even though I have my reasons for being incredibly attracted to young, fresh, delicate, untarnished females, to be honest? I shouldn't NEED to explain myself. Ephebophilia is NORMAL. Has been throughout 99.9% of human history/prehistory. Is in every other species we know of. Sorry to introduce SCIENCE into a subject I know most of you are incredibly biased about, but it is what it is.
Thank you for reading and I hope you all found that illuminating. Now, if anyone has a legitimate (facts, not feeling based) reason for the hatred and discrimination we ephebophiles routinely face, I would love to hear it.
I think you need to mind your own business here. The #1 comment is worried about fucking up the 13 yr old. Shit doesn't happen like that. Sure, there are some people that date younger partners because it allows them leverage in the relationship. This would be toxic but that's not necessarily why your friend is dating a younger girl. Then, there are people that start dating when they are really young because they naturally gravitate to imbalanced relationships. Those people needed help before getting into any relationships with anyone so we can't blame the elder partner for fucking them up.
When I was in my twenties, I started dating a girl. She looked young, but she was very sexy. She assured me she was legal age and I even met her mom! Anyway, as time went on, things didn't make sense. I find out that she was 15 AND that her bf before me was actually older than me. She had misled him too. As it turned out, she had a whole bunch of issues that led to drug abuse and emotional problems. Dating older men was a symptom, not a catalyst, of her issues.
Yet, I've also met plenty of long term couples that started dating older people at a young age. This Saturday, I'll be spending time with a good friend. She is in her early 30s. She started dating her husband when she was 16 and he was 31. I also worked with two females that each met their husbands when they were underage and the guy was in his 30s or 40s. Completely well-adjusted people. I think its just as ignorant to look at age gaps as inherently unhealthy as it is to look at interracial or homosexual the same way.
This reminds me of my liberal White best friend who was also murdered by illegal immigrants. That tragedy ultimately started me on my journey here. But unlike the murder of my best friend, her murder actually made national news - and so hopefully her tragic death will actually make a difference when it comes to finally changing our insanely lax immigration policies. After all, this was pretty much the exact scenario that Trump launched his presidential campaign on. If her murder doesn't give Trump the political momentum and moral legitimacy that he needs to finally force the treasonous motherfuckers in our government to crack down on illegal immigration, then nothing will. And hopefully her death will help to wake up at least some brainwashed shitlibs too.
Unfortunately, I already know that most White liberals will respond to the news of her murderer being a brown-skinned "Hispanic" (Amerind/Mestizo) illegal immigrant by arguing that criminal scumbags come in all skin tones. Or if they've been indoctrinated by the SPLC and leftist media outlets, they'll avoid confronting ugly truths about Hispanic and black crime rates and the hugely lopsided nature of interracial crime by arguing that most crime is intraracial.
All racial groups obviously commit crime, but we know from crime statistics that there's pretty huge racial gaps [1]. And those gaps aren't meaningless. They clearly matter on a societal scale. It's why most Hispanic and black countries have much higher violent crime rates than most White and Asian countries. And it's why the bad parts of town that you try to avoid are usually dominated by Hispanics and blacks.
And the primary reason why most crime is intraracial is because humans are inherently tribalistic and ethnocentric, and so they subconsciously tend to congregate around people that are like themselves as much as possible. If most White people didn't avoid the "bad" (i.e., Hispanic and black) parts of town, then interracial violent crime rates would be even more insanely lopsided than they already are.
Re: 'To All The Boys I've Loved Before' Has Creepy Racial Things Going On | Plan A Magazine
(MyBad64)
This movie is an excellent reminder of the lingering pseudo-, false-, 1980’s style liberal take on AF representation of what it’s supposed to be like for an Asian-American (Canadian) teen. Movies like this were made to frame the narrative of WMs were the natural partner for AFs back then (a tsunami of them,with nothing showing the opposite or any different couplings). People haven’t discussed the normalization of this in Disney, Nickelodeon and other kids channels which also exclusively pair young Asian girls with white boys with no Asian boy in sight (except maybe Ravi an Indian-American boy, there are no East Asian-American looking boy). Solid work of imprinting and propaganda work to frame Asian boys and girls psyche on their future place in the American gendered racial caste system.
(Kenzo89)
This is a great article. This story seems to literally be the dream world of white worshipping AF who want a world with only white men and only Asian women. She even made the father white so there’s literally no Asian men.
(FourzeKITA)
Excellent, well-written piece. The actress doesn't do the movie any service (not that it is worthy of any) by saying she and the author demands more male Asian romantic leads in American films, yet have none to show in this one. As was said in the article, the movie is portraying whiteness as peak masculinity, whereas the minority races are seen as nonexistent or feminine. I can't imagine how much these genuine issues will be ignored and deemed as "overreaction" by the general audience, some of whom are of our own race.
(Dean_Friedman)
Wow, that was very well-written. He hit the nail right on the head by labeling it “racial neo-liberalism”. That’s exactly what it is. Putting aside the author’s own self-hate, there’s an obvious reason why this film is so marketable- it’s “progressive” in the most bare-minimum way, to be palatable to a wider, racially ignorant audience. They’re just trying to make a quick buck off the backs of minorities, while erasing the real experiences of Asians/hapas in a Eurocentric society. It’s written like a white person’s fantasy of what it’s like to be a half Asian woman.
Also, lmao at the mom dying from slipping on the kitchen floor. Wtf?
(eddyjqt5)
the neo liberalism is too real.... they'll tell you that being progressive means seeing past our skin colour and putting our color blind goggles on. Basically: promote post racial individualism under the guise of true equality, when in reality its just gentrification, white flight, cultural appropriation, and assimilation. So asians eventually don't even identify as asians. Honestly, neo-liberalism kind of props up white supremacy in an indirect way...
(Dean_Friedman)
Exactly. Neoliberalism= “we’ll only tolerate the profitable aspects of your culture”.
The only way you can make it to the top is if you work in the interests of white supremacy. Why do you think AA “acceptance” has a female face? Because Asian women have been sexually commodified.
(Handsome_Golden_Boy)
Jenny Han is a fucking racial fetishizing creep. Period. Seriously she comes off extremely off and creepy.
Let's disagree with her ideas, no need to personally attack her.
Remember, she grew up in the 80s in Virginia, and she's the product of that environment.
Doesn’t matter. She’s still doing severe damage to the Asian community and she’s being backed and supported by white supremacy. Sure there’s a reason why she is the way she is, but would you forgive the Joker because he used to be a good man who fell into a vat of toxic chemicals? Besides, her actions are creepy and fetishistic, nothing he said was wrong. Just look at how she creepily fetishizes her hapa nephews, comparing them to white actors.
(aleastory)
I can already see all the news articles about some Asian girl getting killed by her white boyfriend/husband/uncle/brother-in-law/family friend/father. All thanks to people like Jen the Hun *thumbs up*
Gee, what "positive" representation that is /s.
I really understand the struggles of Asian men, but you really don't make a case for us to like you. You're among the most selfish, self-aggrandizing people I've ever met. And quite frankly, black hair and brown eyes are pretty boring. It sucks to be you but don't blame us, blame your mother for giving birth to you. I hope you can be reborn more privileged next life.
We could be like Jews? Uh...they have a country.
But sure...i guess that when we no longer control our own country we could enjoy life by subverting, weakening, and plundering the people who replaced us. We can stop worrying about lofty goals like the pursuit of knowledge and be a totally self serving force ruled by spite and a desire for revenge. I'm fine with that.
Once white people go the entirety of progress and civilization will likely follow, seeing as there is only one racial and ethnic group that has routinely been able to produce and push the limits of human evolution further.
What would be an ideal world, according to Eastern Sun Rising?
I know that for white people, their ideal world would be one where all Azn men are emasculated tech & science slaves, while all Azn females are white men only sex slaves.
What would the ideal world be for Eastern Sun Rising? Can you imagine the reverse situation where all white men are emasculated tech & science slaves, while all white females are Azn men only sex slaves?
I dont even want that, but would I if I could? Since according to Genghis Khan's quote: ."The real greatest pleasure of men is to repress rebels and defeat enemies, to exterminate them and grab everything they have; to see their married women crying, to ride on their steeds with smooth backs, to treat their beautiful queens and concubines as pajamas and pillows, to stare and kiss their rose-colored faces and to suck their sweet lips of nipple-colored."
Personally, my ideal world would not focus on sexual imperialism and enslavement, but that's just me. (but would i if i could?)
For white women, it would be only white men who are sexually dominant but socially weaker. Add some African sex slaves (back in the day they watche with pleasure as a black man OR BOY was lynched because he was accused of staring at the white woman. She lied of course).
For white men, it would only be submissive white female sex slaves, and some Asian men to torture for fun or hunt. Machines would do all the work (replacing Asians).
I guess in my original post, that ideal world view would belong to a westernized Asian women
For AF, ideal world would look like all socially submissive but sexually dominant white men, and occasional black male sex slave, and occastional AM to torture or hunt with WM.
what do you think is the ideal world for AM then?
A world with no anti-AM racism.
Asian domination. Plain and simple.
Re: Finally let myself be completely naked in the women's locker room, and it was so incredibly liberating. • r/asktransgender
(bkp13)
How on earth does no one see a problem with this? This guy is bragging about (1) hanging out in a women's locker room where women typically are naked and (2) upping the ante and subjecting said women to his dick.
And then all the comments are about how brave and badass he is, to force his dick on a bunch of naked women.
He says it's liberating to force his dick on women.
I'm hitting peak trans right now.
(chuckyarelalala)
Two spot on comments from a trans identified person that were deleted:
I think it makes us look odd too because the association with trans women is that we do not like how we were born and when someone openly flaunts in a setting around a bunch of naked women it raises...questions.
Yeah disregard other peoples trauma just so you can feel validated! How great!
(JuliasPhoenix)
Yeah, that person is pretty astute. Whenever anyone brings up the question of self ID trans women exposing themselves the answer always is, we hate out dicks and don't want to look at them either!
(Redpingo)
I had a peak at his profile. He has also posted a full frontal nude recently on a sub for nudes (he was the only one I saw that wasn't anonymous/ face obscured). He's definitely a exhibitionist and likely getting off on showing people his dick.
(CryptographicBison)
Beyond the many, many selfies in skimpy attire (and heavy makeup, at weird angles he apparently considers flattering), what sticks out to me is the number of pre-transition selfies he has and shares. This is a person who is and always has been utterly obsessed with looking at himself. I am completely unsurprised that someone like this has escalated to forcing women to look at him naked. I am also unsurprised that the response from most of that sub is a mix of jealousy and admiration. Male socialization, 'i want people to 'admire' me, no matter how involuntary, behold my greatness (and you'd better fucking call it great)' is textbook.
(Draconiss)
This is why it correlates so heavily with narcissism. Narcissism will always be more prevalent in men than in women.
(bkp13)
That is definitely the vibe I got -- he felt "liberated" ie, loved parading himself around in view of all these women -- like, it seemed like some kind of weird fantasy he had, to impose himself that way.
You can't do stuff like that at the office or the grocery store (unless you want to risk arrest). You need access to women's spaces, and to call yourself a "woman." Sickening.
(lggc)
Lol real women, no matter how great their bodies are, hate being naked in front of other women. No one struts around naked in the showers.
(GeraldoSemPavor)
They're all fetishists.
They are doing this shit because it gets them off, and they are bullying society into accepting their inappropriate sexual behavior and fetish.
Some of them probably extra get off on making women physically uncomfortable too, and of course having the excuse of "but no I am woman too" let's them rationalize their abusive behavior.
(TerribleConfusion)
The deleted comments from “transphobes” are actually from trans people who think this is not cool.
I feel bad for them, almost as much as I do for the targets of his exhibitionism. Violating women’s consent is part of how he gets his jollies, obviously, and he also doesn’t care about throwing other trans people under the bus as long as he gets attention. I think he is hoping it will blow up into a big controversy with him at the centre of it. What a vile, pathetic person.
(CricketNiche)
That guy in your link that says he's making it harder for the rest of them to access our spaces. He's not wrong. But at least he's trying to police the penis-wagging.
That's exactly why I want to see this happen all over, ASAP.
We can talk until we're blue in the face about how this will effect us, but all that talk is doing nothing. We need women to see this firsthand. We need the public to be visibly educated on the realities of the situation.
They need to see the truth, that MtT want to keep their penises and want to shove their penises down our throats literally and figuratively.
They are changing not from some incidental organic pattern of behaviour, but by a enforced immigration that many Canadians want to see drastically reduced. As for the SA/NA indigenous in the 1500s+ their civilization were, and I don’t mean this disparagingly, Stone aged tribes. They were conquered by the Europeans in the same way that they had conquered one another’s tribes for millennia. I would also point out that they fought like warriors defending what was theirs. Supplanting current White Canadians with a never ending wave of immigration to enforce “diversity/multiculturalism” is suicide from within by a ideologically authoritarian government.
Dunno about other places, but China certainly can't afford to ignore what has been one of the chief pillars of American power for the last 50 years. Its ability to attract entrepreneurs and visionaries from every corner of the world. Whether it be the Indian CEOs at Microsoft and Google, or for that matter one of the founders of Google, Elon Musk, even our own people like Jerry Yang and Steven Chen.
You're right in that creating large pockets of foreigners creates among them an identity crisis as they clash with the locals that's simply better avoided, as Nations will always have internal problems and stacking upon them does it no favors. So I think a greencard program of sorts would work. Allow only foreign entrepreneurs and engineers who qualify to come and ply their crafts. If they choose to bring their families, enroll their children in international schools. Make it clear that no matter what, that although their efforts are appreciated they are still guests and should respect their host country as such. And by only allowing these select few gifted individuals who can contribute to advancing technology, medicine, science, etc. you can keep the population small enough so that the locals don't feel they are experiencing an invasion of people coming to take their jobs and change their identity.
I think the key to this where the West failed is keeping the population restricted to solely educated people so that the population stays small and making sure they feel welcome, but also making sure that they and the natives are aware that they are foreigners. The worse thing that could happen to immigrant populations is that they start feeling they are entitled as citizens of that country and demand concessions. If you send these foreign entrepreneur's children to local schools and they complain about bullying, that could definitely reinforce those sentiments. Their kids won't get the shit kicked out of them, we Asians are far too civilized for that, but for example the world already raises hell about Africans in Guangzhou, eventhough all they get is slurs and not once has a Chinese person committed an act of violence against them. Make these people aware that they are guests in the country and their obligations are solely to their craft. Their children should have residency in China as long as their parents do, but also be citizens of their native countries and in addition to learning Mandarin, making sure they know how to speak their native tongue. And boom everybody's happy. The educated individuals get to ply their trade and the locals won't be radicalized by fears of foreigners taking their jobs and their country.
It's always a two-way street though. For every minority group that becomes "absorbed", the cultural barycenter of the majority will be shifted slightly from its original position. With the amount of shift directly proportional to both the size of the minority group as a proportion of the majority population, and to the racial/cultural distance between the two groups.
The founding fathers distrusted democracy, and with good reason.
As long as people routinely avoid educating themselves on history, economics, and politics and gravitate toward emotional decision making, democracy is dangerous. The majority cannot be allowed to oppress the minority. This is why we are a Constitutional Representative Republic. Democracy was never the core of our government, it was the mortar used to fill the cracks; the Constitution is the steel reinforcement, and Representatives are the bricks who act as a filter and brake on the emotionality of mob rule.
Of course that's all been corrupted now, the constituency used to be all relatively educated (for the time) white male landowners, which meant they had a lot in common, they weren't easily divided and conquered over nonsense like we are today. The constituency has been expanded to include a great many more people with opposing cultural values, differing time preferences, differing levels of loyalty to the country, differing levels of emotional shackling, and differing levels of understanding regarding government, history, and economics. Of course, the left thinks all people are interchangeable cogs, exactly the same and so more people is irrelevant. But that's never been true and never will be.
This 'diversity' results in a much more divisive, chaotic system, where tribal factions are easily turned against each other, which makes democracy even more dangerous since people now vote against their own best interests on the promise of getting 'free' stuff from the state or will vote to attack their fellow citizens out of jealousy. The state doesn't have anything, it takes everything from the people, and myopic dunces living on welfare and EBT who don't understand that still get to vote for 'free stuff' with the same veracity as a successful entrepreneur or a statistician or an economic scholar or a historian or an engineer or a doctor gets to vote.
The mob's emotional waves are manipulated and ridden into office by politicians rather than mitigated. The culturally and economically toxic combination of greed and laziness is encouraged in the lower class to expand the voter base for the socialist party. A certain minority uses the grotesque power of the state to control, gaslight, propagandize, and oppress the majority. Since 1971 the federal state has expanded in power and size at a cancerous rate, all thanks to leaving the last vestiges of the gold standard. And there's no end in sight short of the collapse of the USD as the world's reserve currency, a situation our federal government effectively conned the world into.
All of this is thanks to democracy. This country was meant to be a confederation of strong states held together by a relatively weak federal government. It's completely the opposite now thanks to democracy. People are voting for socialism. People are voting to disarm themselves. People are voting for policies that will turn us into the Soviet Union.
Stop buying the propaganda that democracy is what our government is based on, it's not, it was based on the constitution. Democracy is dangerous and corrosive because people are flawed, they're easily manipulated and can't even see a few years into the future. Democracy may be one of the best of the worst when it's appropriately shackled by a constitution and the constituency is relatively homogeneous and educated and has 'skin in the game' regarding the fate of the country and their state, but when you take those factors away as has been done over the last couple hundred years you create INCREDIBLE levels of DYSFUNCTION.
I believe such a state would fail miserably. Like it or not, social cohesion is very closely tied to genetic similarity...and feeling like you are part of a family is what inspires people to do great things, rather than narcissistic hedonism. You need such a philia in order to support a real civilization...regardless of IQ.
some nerdy people might think they feel a sort of brotherhood of IQ-ness. But I believe they are kinda fooling themselves...and empirical data supports that also.
At the end of the day, mother nature has given you your brain to act in the service of your gene replication...and a person who is the same race as you has more of your genes...i.e. is more 'you'...than someone of a different race. You can, of course, try to rebel against this purpose...but it still informs your instinct and your desires....and rebelling too much against your own instinct can lead you to paralysis and nihilism.
It's hard to know what to trust about the third Reich these days...but having read a decent amount of Nazi literature myself I find the story of euthanizing mentally ill to be quite believable.
To be honest...my personal philosophical journey in the past few years has caused me to develop some scorn for the popular 'Ethics of pity'. Unless there is some good reason to take care of the weak, I am not sure why we should.
I can absolutely sympathize with your emotional reaction to this sort of thing. Yes, it seems unnecessarily brutal to simply eliminate a person because they are retarded. Letting them live does not seem like some unreasonable sacrifice. I was raised in a culture of pity and mercy just like you were...so I learned the same emotional response like you did.
At the same time...in a very cold blooded way...i increasingly feel like a tolerance for parasitism is a fundamental objective weakness of my culture...and it can be attacked and destroyed with that weakness.
Well it's not wrong. England is allowing herself to to be re conquered it's just this time she didn't resist.
I feel the most sorry for the young alt right men living in England who are watching this real time, the only ones fully aware of what's actually happening, and whom would be thrown in jail for organizing against it.
What I find interesting about all this is that it's really not uncommon for the royalty of England to mistreat her subjects. This mixing is just a way for England to abolish the middle classes and establish a new slave class which is all she ever wanted in the first place. She's sacrificing millions of her sons and daughters so that a few thousand men can have their two tier society, again. It's the natural order in their eyes.
What's funny is these Muslims will attempt to slaughter those 1000 elites once they hit a critical mass.
Here's how I think it will play out. Jews and their race traitor allies will continue importing non whites until Muslims hit such a critical mass they attempt to overthrow the crown and establish the UK as a new Caliphate. Then the jews finally have their rallying cry for a 'war on Islam' (they were hoping 9/11 would be but those inbred arabs couldn't get to the white house and thus americans weren't angry enough) and the jews use their shabbos goys (us) for waging WWIII with the Muslims. After the dust is settled they expand Israel over the bones of american british, palestinian, and syrian bones.
We can't stop this until europeans and euro americans start openly challenging the holohoax. The 6 gorillion is how they keep us enslaved. If the holohoax falls it will be like a domino effect on jewish power. It will be seen as more reasonable to openly confront jews and question their motives. Jews can't run their schemes under too much scrutiny.
1st and foremost we don’t like miscegenation because it means less white people. Especially when black gets with white that means the dominant black traits will appear much more than the recessive white traits in the offspring. This is probably the main reason. I believe nature endowed the white race with certain qualities that can be considered superior to those in other races. The combination of intelligence, desire to explore the great beyond, warrior mentality, and physical beauty/sexual attractiveness is found in the white race on a much greater level than that of other races in my opinion. If white mixes with black all of these things that took nature hundreds of thousands of years to bless us with will be destroyed.
Second I don’t think mixed race people are suited for survival at all. Miscegenated animals are more prone to physical and mental disease, they are incapable of making their own offspring often times and if they do have offspring those offspring have a tough time making offspring. They are also unable to defend themselves in the wild. You would think the offspring of a Lion and a Tiger would be a killing machine but it isn’t and it cannot survive in the wild. Though humans have less genetic variation amongst the different races than say dogs do, I still think we should follow the laws of nature that encourage us to stay with our own for the most part.
there have been laws prohibiting race mixing in 44 out of the 50 US States. Despite the push from the Zionist media to normalize race mixing and encourage it, people still overwhelmingly stay within their own as just 7% of white men and women marry outside of their race. Studies prove that interracial marriage is the most likely predictor of a divorce except for one of the partners having a diagnosed mental illness. Black male white female marriages have an extremely high rate of domestic violence even much higher than that of black male black female.
How does it affect my life? Every single thing that occurs in this world has an affect on my life because of the ripple effect it creates. It may not even affect my life that much now but I don’t want my children living in a society with a bunch of mixed race mongrels that they can’t really trust. I want them to live in a society with people who act like them, think like them, identify with them, and don’t hate them for being white. I want them to live with a lot of strong white people so they are in an environment that is conducive towards passing down my specialized traits and my identity to future generations.
Wanting to "preserve" hapas is silly. Especially in the west. Asians have no claim to the west. They make good citizens for the most part, but they have their own countries which are holding against the Soros-lead globalist onslaught of third world trash designed to take down western civilisation one truck of peace or loss of freedom at a time. Asia and Eastern Europe are the last bulwarks. Western Europe and all the major British colonies are being packed to the gills with large numbers of people who will never assimilate, who bring their anti-western, ant-freedom ideologies and feuds with them - and even those who don't, you can guarantee most are still never going to contribute more than they extort from the increasingly small pool of (mostly white and Asian) taxpayers.
Who a hapa female dates is her own business. She didn't ask to be mixed race. I would prefer it was white or Asian - but if she wants to further complicate her kid's bloodline that's up to her. She's only following what her selfish parents did.
I don’t think there’s a metaphysical superiority in those qualities, only a material difference in outcome. Also Asians are smarter than whites on average but I don’t want an Asian society replacing the one my people passed on to me. I reject white supremacist as a label because it’s just a slur meant to poison the well rather than a meaningful descriptor. I don’t want to rule over non-whites or go out of my way to arbitrarily attack them. Their biological differences from whites aren’t a matter of my desire to be superior just a reality to acknowledge and understand.
on r/jailbait
Would you explain something to me? I know this is gonna be buried like most of my comments in this subreddit, but I'd like to ask: what do you think should be done with pedophiles?
First of all, I'm not interested in jailbait at all, only the arguments that are going on about it. Yes, these guys are attracted to kids: what makes that more "sick" as you say than being attracted to guys? Didn't liberalism achieved (or tried at least) to make people understand that gay people were born that way and it's not a choice?
People have weird and "disgusting" fetishes, but I don't think I'll ever see you fight with a group of guys who are attracted to ghosts (even though they are out there). I think the fear from pedophiles comes from those crazy kidnapper-stories and cases, and in no way do I support any of those sick crimes, nor the theft of personal images. But if you're liberal, then you should understand that these guys have a sexual urge, and they have to fulfill it somehow. If we force them to repress it, then I think it'll most likely "explode" out from them, and make them actually do something horrible. But as of now, at least they have a place to "live off" the pressure.
If there would be stolen pictures of 7 year olds or something, than I'd fully be against jailbait, but browsing through it's front page I've got the impression that most of those girls look like they were intended to make those photos for the exact purpose of getting someone aroused. The way I see it, there is no real harm done. Of course if the author requests it or if it doesn't look like a public photo, then it should be removed immediately.
Then what is the alternative? As I've said, I believe that shutting it down would be even less peaceful on the long run. Mind you: I'm not on their side, and if I could just make pedophilia disappear, I would do it without hesitation. But shutting off their community is not going to achieve that: in fact, that way they won't know that there are more people like them out there, they'll feel like outcasts, and I believe that feeling is the first step of becoming an actual serial killer or something.
I am 26 and am turned on by /r/jailbait. Am I fucked up?
you are not a perv. My husband was 25 and I was 17 when we got together. Before that, I was 15 and he was 23 when he took my virginity. He was not a perv. He was practically my age because of the differences in the maturity of men and women.We mature differently and women mature faster than men. Hence the r/jailbait. If they are younger than 13, you are a perv because they can't possibly understand what sex is or even know the repercussions of their actions or others. While I don't necessarily agree with r/jailbait, I'm pretty sure that almost ALL men are attracted to young, virile, fertile girls. It is not unnatural because 100+ years ago, if you started your period, you got married. But now, it's considered pedophilia. Don't let all the haters get you down. You are one of about 3 billion that like teens too. You go younger than that, then you have a problem.
Agreed. I think this is the main reason that men get accused of "mate guarding" so much.
Protecting "your" women is hard
wired from tens of thousands of years of tribalism and conquest.
This is the reason women are so soft on immigration. When they were conquered, they got to live - albeit as sex slaves to their conquerors. But their (new) offspring survived. The men were all slaughtered and their offspring were killed. A permanent end to their line.
The oldest settlements and bodies found in North America are from white Europeans and by significant time differences from oldest "Native" remains found. Natives didn't sprout up there - they migrated. The still don't predate Europeans on the continent. By your own logic, all of NA is white territory.
Whites also settled the land. That's why they are called settlers. They build towns, cities, roads, tamed the wilderness and made the continent liveable. They became colonies of Britain, but the people were settlers. Natives didn't even have the wheel or permanent settlements and were constantly killing each other.
Conquest is a part of history. Otherwise no land belongs to anyone. How is Europe european if you ignore conquest? THe native population is gone. America is white, Australia is white. That's like saying south americans don't have any claim to south america. Who does then? The people who used to live there are dead
Agreed, various people have been conquering each other for millennia. Extended periods of occupation and development give rise to various claims. Is Anatolia "rightfully" owned by Persians, Greeks, or Turks? Even citing Pakistan as a good example of a "native" territory is absurd as that area has changed hands many times.
The bottom line is that the Americans, and specifically the US and Canada, are desirable today because of the land Europeans cultivated, cities Europeans raised, and infrastructure Europeans built. It was not an open free for all until well after all this was built.
There is literally nowhere on earth that people didn’t migrate to and conquer before making it their home. Even Britain suffered an Anglo-Saxon invasion. Poland used to be wholly Germanic before the old tribes were usurped by proto-polish migrants. Japan was mostly Ainu at one point. America is no different it’s just newer so people like you shit on the people’s claim to try and act like you support the real peaceful nationalism and pander to leftists. There is no America apart from whites and no conception of one before them.
This is actually a good point. The Mexican government made a really bad move allowing white settlers into their territories. The Whites didn't assimilate into Mexican culture and government and eventually demanded sovereignty. This caused Mexico to lose a huge chunk of her land.
The same will happen to the United States if we allow large numbers of immigrants and especially immigrants further and further away from western european values and genetics.
I live in Australia, on the east coast and we use Australian Eastern Standard Daylight Time (AEDST). On the night of September 11, 2001 I was enjoying watching the Bob Dylan documentary from 1967, 'Don't Look Back' on ABC TV Australia.
At that time it must have been about 11.00 pm because the documentary hadn't been on for long. This made the time in New York city just then about 9.00 am. (The first plane having hit at 8.46 am.)
A shockingly worded message suddenly came across the top of the TV screen, telling me of a disaster occurring right now in New York city where two planes had crashed into both of the twin towers.
Immediately, I thought to myself, 'Wow, one plane crashing into the towers might be just an accident, but two? No way! This can't be anything other than a deliberate attack!'
The Dylan documentary quickly disappeared and a live broadcast of a scene of the twin towers came on screen, however, I was surprised to see there was only one plane set smouldering, embedded in just one of the two towers, and not two as just reported a minute or so earlier. I thought maybe the news must have made a mistake, since it had only just happened and sometimes news reports are a little blurry when they first report details of an event.
I watched this surreal scene in a state of growing shock and about two minutes later a second plane came into view and slammed into the side of the other tower.
Soon my best friend rang me, starting off the conversation with the words, "Are you watching this..?" Most of our conversation from then on was just silences and expletives peppered with the occasional 'I can't believe this!' as we watched for the next hour or so and the whole awful series of events took place.
At the time, I didn't really think too much about the odd discrepancy in the reporting of the fact that two planes had struck, even though when they began broadcasting what I assumed was live footage of events as they unfolded, there appeared to only be one crashed plane and the other one crashing didn't happen until after the transmission had begun.
I've done some research and a live broadcast from NY to Australia today in 2018 has only a seven second delay and I don't understand why there would have been any more delay than that back in 2001, since live satellite broadcasts were common place back then.
If that was a live broadcast of events as they happened with no delay present, I really can't explain why there seemed to be this foreknowledge of the event of the second plane crashing on the part of the ABC TV Australia news reporting services and so, the whole thing as it unfolded back then today looks more and more very much like a major glitch in the matrix.
I wonder what could have caused the news of the twin towers seem to report the second plane crashing before it actually happened?
TLDR: In Australia, news of the twin towers seemed to report the second plane crashing before it actually happened.
Also I'd argue North America is a white homeland because when we started exploring it the native population plummeted to such low levels by not having immunity to european disease there's really no way you can claim they 'inhabited' the entire continent. It's just absurd. They were also never very unified and are not unified now.
