All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
Chicago Tribune Article Today: "'Prison is not where women need to be': All-female task force wants to cut Illinois’ female prison population in half"
(JStheHammer)
“Prisons were made for men, and they are made to traumatize,” said Celia Colon"
(lostapwbm)
“Prisons were made for men, and they are made to traumatize,” said Celia Colon, who teared up after sharing with the group her history of abuse. “They were not made for healing.”
Traumatizing men is perfectly acceptable. Traumatizing women (who got to prison by traumatizing others) is not acceptable because...women are equal to men?
“Prison is not where women need to be,” said Benedict, a partner on the National Resource Center on Justice Involved Women, funded by the U.S. Department of Justice. “Even if prisons were highly functional places, they don’t belong there. It’s a train wreck, to be honest, a train wreck.”
If women commit felonies, then prison is exactly where they need to be. As a matter of fact, women commit felonies and gynocentric judges and prosecutors often REFUSE to send them to prison.
Margaret Byrne, an attorney who for 35 years has represented countless women who fought back against abusers, agreed. Many women call 911 to report the violent crime they’ve just committed on a partner, Byrne said, but they fail at proving the difficult self-defense theory in court.
Probably because you can't 'self-defense' a man while he's sleeping, or when his back is turned, or when he's not presenting an immediate and credible threat.
By the time she was 16 and living in South Chicago, Colon had drifted into gang life, drawn by its offer of support — and guns for protection.
“I saw a lot of hurt and bloodshed,” Colon, 42, told the other women gathered at the first meeting. “Things that are never gonna be erased. It does irreversible damage.”
You mean you validated cholos and gangbangers by giving them pussy.
Those who insist that they cannot be held responsible for their own actions, that they are merely leaves floating along the winds of economic circumstances, ore are victims of societal programming, should not enjoy the right to affect or influence public policy or the use of public money.
(HeForeverBleeds)
I've got a long list of articles where people try to argue for female criminals getting lenient sentences or no jail on the basis of being female. A long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long, long list. I guess this one can be added
I think part of why it's such a popular idea is because gynocentrism is prevalent in both of the main ideologies. Feminism says females are always the oppressed victim to the point where even female criminals are truly the victims and therefore prison is "victimizing" them again. Traditionalism stereotypes women as helpless, innocent, childlike, and basically too weak to be a threat; therefore she's not really responsible for any crime she commits
Both tend to perceive women as morally superior. Both tend to perceive the well-being of the female in any given situation (whether she's the victim or the perpetrator) as more important and more worthy or in need of being protected
(fractureegg)
Yep. And proof of your argument can be found from a statement made a hundred years ago by Chicago attorney Agnes McHugh. In 1906 she said, “A man-jury will not convict a woman murderer in this county, if the prosecutor is a man. I think this leniency may be traced to the chivalry latent in every man.”
Turns out that having a female prosecutor or judge or females on the jury doesn't make any difference.
I don't have any stats handy but it's possible that female accountability vis a vis the justice system has actually grown over the past few decades. In patriarchies the main female "sin" is adultery, which is often severely punished; but they get away with pretty much everything else. (In some primitive fundamentalist religious societies, "witchcraft" is also severely punished).
But I guess it was inevitable that after a brief flirtation with the idea of treating women as semi-adults, feminists wouldn't be able to resist exploiting gynocentrism to increase their privileges even more. But women are still supposed to be treated like equals somehow. Zero logic or sense of justice, as usual.
(VantagePoint2018)
Generally, people look at the motives and background of female criminals whereas they just assume male criminals are uniquely evil.
(Razorbladekandyfan)
This is why we need a mens movement.
Ironic Hypocrisy in TwoXChromosomes right now
So over on TwoXChromosomes right now there's a post called "I was just catfished and it was kind of terrifying" posted by a transwoman. I commented before I realized. I'm not posting the link because I don't want them to get the notification and I really don't like brigading.
Anyway all the comments are like "OMG you poor thing, it's absolutely atrocious how men don't respect lesbian's boundaries and try to convince lesbians to have sex with them!"
Of course OP is a pre-op transwoman who previously posted "hey fellow women how can I make my voice cuter cause you all do that" and "does everyone want to be their favorite anime girl or is it just me?"
Reality is broken. This is peak. Seriously, how is this not an episode of South Park or the Twilight Zone?
(YahwehTheDevil)
That thread is fascinating:
"Here me out, I know you don't like dick but you haven't seen mine!" Fucking losers.
I’m a lesbian as well and have also been catfished by men, unfortunately multiple times. So many men just don’t take lesbianism seriously, and view it as a challenge.
You just don't appreciate the mystical power of dick! As if lesbians could actually be happy without dick, they're just deluding themselves! Then when you trick them into coming close you shove yours in their face and BOOM their delusion crumbles and they'll be desperate for your schlong.
I don't care if you are gay or straight that is not cool, who thinks anyone would want to start a relationship based on a lie?
I was supposed to meet “her” at the Walmart because it was near my house and in a public place.
If you don’t understand why a man catfishing a lesbian is creepy as fuck, you’re part of the problem
By misleading a lesbian and making that connection while in the guise of a woman, you pretty much out yourself as a creep and a liar. The connection was made via deceit
I'm of the opinion that, although adults should be allowed to get SRS and HRT, and that they shouldn't be discriminated against because of those things, people have a reasonable expectation for a man to have an actual, functioning penis, and for a woman to have an actual, functioning vagina. Genitals, while not a sufficient condition for attraction, are for most people a necessary condition, and to call yourself a woman when you don't have a vagina is deceptive.
I wonder if that thread would play differently if everyone know that OP was a pre-op trans.
(radfemanon)
It's almost like trans ideology is super duper homophobic.
(DifferentAirGC)
Off-topic, but I wonder if TIMs think the name of that subreddit is exclusionary and "TERFy"
(contecorsair)
There's a few xx subs like that, like xxketo for example, which I like/hope is for actual women and transmen, because biology matters, especially when specifically talking about something that effects your hormones and so many women, myself including, have absent or two week+ menstruation from keto or are using keto to help with diabetes and ovarian cysts. (And no transwomen are not "just like women with PCOS". Gag me.) There was this "I'm an XY women am I welcome?" Seriously, who other than trans ask if they are "welcome" on a sub? People are free to subscribe and post to any sub as long as it's relevant. Why ask? Even GC doesn't have a "no Transcribers" rule. They are just fishing for validation at our expense. Like, if I'm uncomfortable with it, like I am, what am I supposed to do? Say, "Actually, this sub is not for you, it's for people talking about the specifics of dealing with keto and how it changes the female body."? No. I'll be downvoted to hell and labeled transphobic. So they come seeking validation, I'm just asking an innocent honest question, no hate plz~ but we all know that there's only one allowed answer to the question or you get banned, downvoted, or threatened.
(lesbianisntabadword)
Go sort by “top of all time” on xxketo and you’ll find a post at the very top welcoming a TIM with open arms.
Many even suggest changing the name because xxketo is “exclusionary” and “chromosomes shromosomes”. And that was as of 74 days ago.
Many even had the audacity to say that women with PCOS could “relate to his androgen problems” so he should fit right in.
Uhh... seriously? I have PCOS and that does NOT make me relate more to a man, Tina. Get out.
So annoying!!
(SeverelyModerate)
I’m sorry .... WHAT?!!?! Are you fucking kidding me!? That’s enraging!!! Chromosomes DO matter when it comes to the expression of literally every gene in the body. Your risk of osteoporosis, certain cancers, certain diseases ... it doesn’t give a flying fart what the patient “identifies” as. I promise. And the PCOS thing has my head spinning like Beetlejuice. I can’t. It’s too stupid.
(lethalmachine)
I was just part of a thread where a TIF called me a dick. I said “I’m a cunt if you want to be technically correct” so he sent me a PM calling me a terf and all of those pleasantries. When I said “isn’t using genitals as an insult kind of terf-y?” He blocked me right after. The irony is ALWAYS lost on them.
(That90sCaliChick)
Oh trust me. There was a thread where a mother posted about her daughter being 18 and already being a cam girl. I suggested that there could be a chance she was groomed into it and I was dogpiled by these idiots who were pro sex industry!
That's so disturbing, you're probably right! I bet they were like oh no don't tell her to stop, give us her camera name
They didn’t ask for her camera name, but they were making the typical sex pozzer libfem arguments:
“But what if she knows other cam girls”
“You’re perpetuating the stigma.”
(Candentia)
I'm hoping if nothing else that seeing the dogpile on you would convince the mother to refrain from taking pro-porn arguments to heart. If she legitimately cares about what may be happening it's better that her daughter could have someone to talk to about it instead of being left to handle it alone...or worse, with no one but other sex-positive individuals (far more likely to find around her age today) who will offer nothing but encouragement for doing it.
(artificialgraymatter)
The guy in that thread that says lesbians and women should give him a chance as a platonic friend....
Women always owe men something.
*Edit: And I haven’t even gotten to the incel yet.
(Hooksandfangs)
Remind me why we’re not supposed to say these men are utterly revolting, again?
(Burbseverywhere)
LOL. This guy thinks that this other guy has anything in common with his lesbian mother.
I’m glad you’re safe...I should mention that I am a straight married male, but I grew up with a gay mother and I couldn’t imagine someone trying this to her, if you need any help trying to figure out witch VPN to go with I have a few in mind that should help you on all platforms, just let me know if you need any help
I love how these men white knight for trans but when a woman is harrassed it is her fault.
Silly womens acting so sensitive. /s
Natives are not one people for starters. They are different nations and tribes and were frequently fighting and sometimes genociding each other before we arrived. Then they died in the millions from disease weakening their cohesion and culture significantly.
Another important note to point out is that natives didn't and many still don't believe in land ownership. They are basically nomadic and this inability to adapt to westerner and easterners that believe in individual rights and land rights was a major major failing. Therefore, the natives were conquered and conquered people don't get their land back (unless of course the jews propagandize them into emotional terrorists and in that case they actually do get some handouts! Whites are often so dominant the only way to get anything out of them is to manipulate their emotions and their women who are allowed to vote. )
So no we don't have to give them 1/2 of a country they never owned or dominated.
If I ran a small ethnostate I'd ignore them and give them full autonomy in their homelands with no aid or help. I'd try to trade with them and if they polluted my lands or fuck with me I'd wage war on them.
If I ran the entire US as an ethnostate I'd give each member a lump sum payout (100k or so) and then turn the best parts of their reservation into a national park and auction the rest of it off to the highest bidder. Then I'd end all welfare programs for natives within the ethnostate. Sink or swim.
The glaring difference between the definition of "male" and "female" on Medicine Net
(totalrando9)
It's funny... until you realize that young women are being pressured to 'define their gender' and 'decide what pronouns to use.' As the qualifications for 'being a woman' get more obscure and complicated, women will be pressured to dis-identify with the label 'woman.'
What's even worse is that this is supposed to be a medical definition of 'female' - they aren't even limiting their revisionism to 'women' anymore.
(XXisBornFemale)
Men are human.
We are non men.
We are whatever men say that we are. Men define us. We will never be permitted to define ourselves.
(raddy-set-go)
Scrolling further down that very same page:
" Women should be aware that they metabolize a number of drugs differently than men. In some cases and for some medications, the rate of metabolism may be slower, and in other cases, faster. It is, therefore, essential that women are well informed about the kinds and correct dosages of any drugs they are taking. "
But I suppose one can just "identify" out of those differences nowadays
(exhaustedstudent)
A great example of the way that society defines male as the default and woman as some sort of “variation”, which in turn opens the door for every other thing not defined as clearly male to come under the female umbrella.
(TerribleConfusion)
Wow, the thought police truly DGAF about trans men. So much of this movement is purely about sheltering and validating the precious, precious egos of narcissistic transwomen.
I'm thinking also of Cancer Research UK who changed all the wording on their website associated with cervical cancer and other women's illnesses, and left the wording on the men's cancers intact and straightforward.
Anyone got other instances like that? From this thread it seems like the Wikipedia page history for "woman" would be another good example of this. A few years ago the problem with that page was that it was full of misogynistic slurs listed as "synonyms" for "woman" while the page defining "man" was straightforward and scientific. It really does sometimes seem like the trans activists have stepped in to take over where the openly misogynistic dudebros have left off.
You could not 'Give' the us back to native americans any more than you could give Italy back to the Romans.
That history is over. Americans and natives fought...we killed each other...and ultimately the Americans were victorious.
We did not eliminate the last of the natives and I'm glad we didn't. We gave them reservations instead. That was an honorable choice imo...and it seems rather crappy to use our mercy against us by trying to extort us with the remaining natives. Would you really want us to wind up regretting that we did not complete the genocide?
(That90sCaliChick)
What if we women just stopped all emotional or activist labor for TRAs?
I’ve been thinking about this for quite some time. I almost wonder what would happen if every last woman on earth stopped performing emotional or activist labor for TRAs given how shitty they treat us.
I’ve stopped doing any activist labor for them and I’ve never felt better! Same goes for some former libfems I’ve talked to. The minute they put women first is when they realized where they need to be.
Think about it. TRAs get tons of corporate funding and media attention. Why do they need the labor of us everyday women? They can rely on their corporate buddies.
I’ve come to the conclusion that the only reason they guilt and terrorize us into performing labor for them is so they can have us preoccupied and we can’t do things for ourselves. That needs to stop.
I think it would be what is deserved.
I would like to see it now on this website: no more using "cis", as we are humans, not isomers. No more using the word woman for anyone but adult human females. No more emotional labor for men who post here.
If only the libfems would see it that way. They exhaust themselves performing all this labor for them. I can see it in their eyes.
I feel many of our sisters waking up, however. This site has grown so large- there were 4K subscribers when I arrived, and there are 4x that after 18 months.
It is difficult to have patience for women who spend so much of themselves on men. Try to raise consciousnesses wherever you can. I found this site through an article about boys join a girls' sports team.
We will never change all of their minds, but women are worth it, even the ones who oppose us.
Yep. I’m even finding common ground with conservative women on this issue. I know conservative women are handmaidens too, but even if they’re willing to team with us for a short time, it’ll be worth it.
(Omina_Sentenziosa)
The best (or worst) thing about it is that it' s not going to be enough anyway. At the smallest infraction, they will be labeled TERFs as well, and if that doesn' t happen the goalposts will move and TRAs will ask even more insane and impossible shit than they are doing now.
Frankly, I think that TRAs are acting this way because 1) they need women working for them and supporting them since they are lazy and entitled and would never think of, you know... doing something themselves, 2) because they are testing us to see how much we' re willing to take and how far they can go before we snap and tell them to go fuck themselves and 3) because they want to have a "justifiable" reason to hate on us: think about it, what' s better than telling a woman to choke on your dick? Telling a woman to choke on your dick and be called awesome for that.
(XXisBornFemale)
We shouldn't be doing anything at all for men.
Men always do well. And they have plenty of extra energy to rape/mutilate/murder/abuse girls and women. They look out for each other.
Perhaps if they had to make their own sandwiches, do their own laundry, raise their own children, etc., they wouldn't have time or energy to control every uterus, imprison us for miscarriage, etc.
Amen!! This is part of why I’m not having children. I know I would be doing the majority of the child rearing. Fuck that.
Not having children was the single best decision that I ever made.
Some women don't have any choice about their own pregnancies, and I understand that, too.
I am glad that I didn't create more men, for obvious reasons. And I don't know how I would deal with it if I knew that I would be leaving daughters behind when I die. Especially when so many women are so centered on men.
(FabulousNerfherder)
Agreed. I'm going to start a meetup for "womyn" and then plan that woman's festival.
(That90sCaliChick)
Just let me know when and where! I’m sick of every last womyn’s event being coopted by trans activists and porn sick men! Fuck that!
I don't think whites can truly assimilate into asian culture for the same reason I don't think it's really possible for asians to really assimilate into white culture. Because no matter how white/asian you feel, it's other peoples perception of you that decides how you are treated. I therefore see the assimilation process as somewhat generational, by for instance producing a half white/half asian child, this child will have a greater chance of being "accepted" into either culture because they look more white/asian than if they were "full" either.
While I STRONGLY disagree with her being allowed anywhere near a teaching position again , and I do think she should have been punished by being forced on a sex offender registry.... her crime is not the same as when a man does it.
Men and women are not interchangeable. Tabula rasa is bullshit and anyone implying it is a propagandist of the highest order. This is one of the biggest contentions I have with many people on this subreddit, they want to play along with the commie bullshit of tabula rasa despite us knowing that it's bullshit.....
Don't play that game. Not saying that's what OP did, but often times people will respond with what I have mentioned and I am pre-emptively striking.
Yes it is,
When a woman has sex with someone under-age, it is rape!
When a man has sex with someone under-age, it is rape!
Having sex with someone under-age is rape! I don't give a fuck who had sex with who!!
No.
No.
No.
Rape by etymological hard-lock definition means force and violence. A breach of age restrictive protocol does not qualify. The grossly misnamed "Statutory rape" is not actual rape unless the target is 12 or younger, in which case I will concede that point.
In simple terms, not all so-called "rape" is equal and to suggest otherwise is pure unadulterated idiocy.
Fantastic opinion you got there. Should I (40 year old male) be able to go out looking for a 14 year old girl to have sex with? As long as she consents, it's all good, right? You are one sick individual for this opinion
Fantastic strawman argument you got there.
Try again, little one.
It's considered a straw man if all he did was switch genders of the situation? I'm not sure you know what a straw man is. Your IQ may be under 18 and like to get fucked but that doesn't apply to children.
He grossly misrepresented my argument, and you are doing the same, what a joke.
You tabula rasa loonies are beneath the level of a child.
I think victim impact should be part of any sentencing.
I work with male survivors and don't know the research, so maybe you could enlighten us.
Half the survivors I work with had female perpetrators. They would disagree with your last sentence. They found their sexual assault by a woman crippling.
Don't be a joke.
her crime is not the same as when a man does it.
It's exactly the same, because it's about age, and position of authority. She raped a minor, while in a position of authority.
Nope.
Men and women are not interchangeable. You can try to pretend otherwise, little tabula rasa acolyte, but reality does not bend to your emotion.
I had sex with a (at least) 24 year old when I was 14.
She was my sisters friend & offered to help me study. She never did & instead we spent a month fucking.
I thought it was cool at the time, it was not. She was gross, a loser, and a predator.
It normalized some things in my mind that were not good. It also let me think some things I did in the future were okay, they weren’t.
I hurt people I care about, and one reason is because this event and others taught me the wrong lessons about what is okay and what isn’t.
Adults should not have sex with children, it’s that simple.
Strawman argument, yawn.
Can I just say that this subreddit is the only place I feel sane?
I'm a millennial (I only mention that bc it seems everyone my age is obsessed with TGism), bisexual woman married to a man and this subreddit is the only place I don't feel f*cking crazy!!! I can't tell anyone how I feel though for fear I'll be seen as a bigot or ignorant. I've been seriously disturbed by the backwards mindset of transgenderism for years - starting in Feminist Theory in college. My professor posed this very question: If we truly believe as feminists that our gender does not define our capabilities, why the hell do people insist on changing their gender? Because they "feel" a certain way? It reinforces the idea that only women are supposed to cry or have close friendships or love men. I know I'm preaching to the choir hear, it just feels so good to get this all off my chest.
It also drives me absolutely mad that TG is seen as SOOOOOOO BRAAAAVE and people are elbowing each other out of the way to use certain bathrooms and be allowed on sports teams, be considered women for the purpose of pursuing lesbian relationships, say they've felt this all their lives, it's medically accepted and yet lesbians are still raped, abused, mistreated, and discriminated again every second of the day. These men want to control a woman so desperately that they decide to create their own "ideal" woman. Where my ugly trans chicks at, huh? *crickets* That's what I thought. Even if they don't fit into societal standards of pretty, they all seem to striving for that ideal. It's disgusting and sad.
I cannot stand this trend. I'm a psychiatric professional and I cannot see this as anything but mental illness brought on and/or encouraged by the radical left/men who have internalized homophobia. Our spaces are being invaded, our identity is being invaded. It's utter madness and I can't stand it! I'm so glad this community exists.
It's okay, sexual abuse survivors, TIM's dicks have a "different energy" so pop a xan and get over it, cool?
(artificialgraymatter)
A trans gal's sexuality is docile, patient, hesitant, fragile.
Because a woman’s sexuality is docile, patient, hesitant, fragile—amirite?
I’m impressed they can say that with a straight face. And call themselves feminists.
But then again, they are men....
I’m even more impressed libfems can listen to that with a straight face. And call themselves feminists.
But then again, they are the “right” men.
And a woman’s sexuality is docile, patient, hesitant, fragile. Right libfems? Right?? Remember that when Mr. McDomly CisHet MRA tells you so.
(KeeperoftheSeeds)
I kind of feel the need to hunt down this other nasty article to post comparison quotes. I remember it’s some TiM claiming trans women have better sex than nasty ole boring cis women and our musty vaginas. He claims all sorts of bs like neovags/inverted penises are “fresher” than normal vaginas and that cis women are often “too frigid” in bed and that TiMs are so much more wild and aggressive and willing to be feminine and sexy.
It was a hot fucking mess and full of obvious dude being obvious that his trans identity was a kink he uses to be feminine and talk about being fucked.
Seems likes there’s a reason so many of these dudes start their trans journey with sissy or hypno porn or stealing female family members underwear. Fucking kinksters.
(LittleOwl12)
Don't see how they can be fresher seeing as they have bacteria doctors can't even identify.
(angrytardis)
Yet if you turn them down it’s all “choke on my lady dick”
(pixipod)
But somehow them saying this doesn't trigger their dysphoria.
(XXisBornFemale)
It never occurs to them that women either like doing bjs or they don't - that it's a preference we can have based on our own thoughts and feelings. They coax and coerce and go for the most manipulative hard sell. It makes me think they know jackshit about female sexuality and wouldn't appreciate anything about it if they did know.
Men don't see us as people, as individuals that want and need varied things.
Like a toaster. It exists for you to stick your bread in. You don't ask the toaster if it is ok to put bread in the slot. In fact, it's very convenient that the toaster can't talk. Because then you would have to listen to it and ignore it if it said no or explain to it that it doesn't matter if it wants bread put into the slot, because it exists to have bread put in it, and that is the only way that the existence of the toaster can be fulfilled.
This is why those sex dolls will never be programmed to talk. Unless it is to agree with everything that a man says to it.
(Red_Dahlia221)
There's zero requirement that trans people take any hormones or do any physical transition at all. Nor are they defined by any type of dysphoria, and I have seen trans males say they like their penis. It would be great if there were ANY criteria other than self ID. So this article is BS.
(KawaiiHarunezumi)
Trans women's brains are exactly the same, however, or they wouldn't write rapey shit like this.
(TerribleConfusion)
Why the fuck can't they just accept that an all-woman event focused on yonic massage might be the wrong place for them? They just want to push every fucking boundary they ever find, don't they? I'd be so uncomfortable in that situation - one person sitting around fondling their penis in a room where nineteen women are doing yoni massage.
And it really creeps me out that this person is a "sex-positive events facilitator" who has so little respect for other people's boundaries and comfort. That is a recipe for badness.
(felinecentric)
they carry a different energy.
Dafuq even is that? They make sexuality sound like feng shui or like thetans in Scientology.
A man's penis swaggers and struts, conquers and acquires, penetrates. A trans gal's genitals generally carry none of this energy
I think the translady doth protest too much. As an actual woman observing it objectively, I know that penises don't swagger and strut, they're more like eroded sausages that inflate with desperation and yearning. To hide from the melancholy nature of this, a man imagines the penis as a powerful weapon. What this writer is displaying is typical male anxiety about how sex makes you vulnerable.
And he keeps calling grown women (and men) 'gals'. Ew.
When you take over the institutions, the real agenda comes out.
(Dingus_Incel)
Ever since the rise of Trump the far left in the West have pretty much revealed themselves for what they truly are. I'm not a huge Trump fan and have a lot of problems with him. But I'm glad his presence started panicking the elites so much they played their entire hand and just admitted what they have always wanted to do.
Feminism really was about female supremacy, racial equality was just anti-white, atheism was just anti-Christian, they really do want some type of weird quasi-socialst economy and open borders. They do genuinely have disdain for the West and its people and want to replace them. I used to think it was all a nonsense conspiracy but I was disappointed to find out there was a lot more truth to the "globalist agenda" than I thought.
(fuckbitchesman)
Liberals, feminists, SJWs and leftist media hate Trump so that's all the reason I need to support him.
(incelicious)
Well, foids are worth trillions to the economy the way they spend. And not only do they spend their own money, but they spend the money of all the men around them and the government’s money. Of course corporations are pushing for feminism. Men tend to save their money and invest, not blow it on handbags and vagina cream
(notreallymuch)
Feminism is more about female and Chad supremacy. They wouldn't like to see Chad losing his supremacy.
(homey-dont-play-dat)
Desdain for the west is so illogical, they are part of the west. Only thing I can think of are the zionist jews who want revenge on white europe for the holocaust. So they used all their influence to social engineer the west for the past 80 years. But that doesn'to make sense as well. George Soros admitted he sought out and delivered Jews to be registered and or deported. Many Zionists aren't even Jews. The Zionist Jews are mainly white Europeans and Czech. The rich Zionists were never at harm because they could buy their way to Israel when Hitler needed money to fund his war. Only thing I can think of are the zionist jews who just want to create chaos for the sake of chaos. Of from which "can arise zion". They are sick.
(incelicious)
She’s right. Let’s define feminism for what it really is: a movement by sub8 women to make 8+/10 Chads available to them, while making sub8 men better and more cuckolded orbiters, and wishing for the genocide of sub5 men.
(throwawayirl3)
To date, I haven't met a self-defined feminist that didn't get salty when I refused to call myself a feminist even though I made it clear I believe in equality.
Now I see why.
(The_Indigo_Man)
Well yeah obviously everyone deep down knows feminism is nothing more than an ideology based on female supremacy, entitlement and empowerment. Feminism is no different to ISIS. There primary end goal is to eventually begin cutting men's heads off.
[ on mark salling's suicide]
This is what happens when you demonize people for having a legitimate mental illness. Literally a virtually victimless crime and this guy has his entire life ruined to the point where he would rather be dead.
What the fuck is wrong with you? Having a shitload of child pornography on your computer isn’t a symptom of a mental illness nor is it a victimless crime
Well, it could be a sign of mental illness.
As for victimless crime, I'm not sure. No one hold me accountable for buying clothes made in China. No one holds me accountable for masturbating to porn actresses that feel taken advantage of. No one holds me accountable for eating palm oil products that lead to deforestation. No one holds me accountable for looking at Jennifer Lawrence nudes. No one holds me accountable for filling my car with gas.
Why am I getting off for free, both by the law and by society, but Mark Salling is seen as someone who deserved to die and one of the worst types of people who ever lived? I understand his crime is worse than worker abuse, exploitation, deforestation, cyber hacking, and war for oil, but why is society's reaction disproportionately so fierce?
However, I still stand by it not being as bad as actually raping a child and stand by it being a sad circumstance anyway. I guess my main concern is that I still buy clothes from sweat shop workers and I don't give a fuck where palm oil comes from, but I don't judge myself for it
Fake femcel is ALMOST redundant. I will admit that some older women, and black women can be too ugly, too masculine for any man to want to commit to. They can still get sex, but not LTRs.
What does every man want? Sex.
What’s the expected outcome out of a relationship? Sex on a consistent basis.
You know how pathetic men are and what kind of shit they are willing do to have the slightest chance with a woman. So why wouldn’t a man want a LTR with any woman?
Case closed.
(wankmastag)
I can say with extreme confidence that straight men will not ever choose trans people over biological females.
(GenderCriticalDad)
If it wasn't for porn I'd agree.
Porn has all the ingredients for a powerful classical condition https://www.simplypsychology.org/classical-conditioning.html effect. The user consumes port in an aroused emotional state, the background content, the ideological assumptions and the actions portrayed in porn become associated with the extreme pleasure of orgasm.
We see this already in the numbers of men expecting anal and other activities that previously played little role in straight sex.
Once porn features trans women, man will become conditioned to respond to the artificial, but hyper exaggerated femininity that TW can perform.
(Comments on Dystopian Trans Future (feel free to contribute)
(pekingnoodl)
We are going to get transracialism too, now, like it or not. Put it on the record that I called it and wait two years--nice, polite liberals will start listing "cisracial" as one of their privileges by 2020. Soon after that it will be a free-for-all and either identitarianism will collapse under the weight of its own bullshit and the left will start to rebuild, or some far worse form of backlash will render it all irrelevant.
(pekingnoodle)
I can't wait until people start wriggling out of accusations of cultural appropriation by saying they are transracial, and SJWs have to just sweat it out.
(BCSmith1971)
Women's sports will elbow out women. Identifying female biology as female will be forbidden. Public discourse will avoid the term "woman" (except when it applies to trans women), embracing instead a list of ungainly alternatives: nonmen, menstruators, bleeders, uterus-havers, and so on. No one will know whether female infanticide is happening anywhere, since birth statistics and census data will no longer indicate biological sex.
(Pajukilpi)
All medical research recognising sex differences is labeled as transphobic and unfunded. As a result female specific medical conditions will be left under detected and getting efficient treatment will be even harder than it's now. Also all future drugs will be less effective and even potentially dangerous for women.
(riseupladies)
Assertive, powerful, or otherwise badass women in fictional works, historical accounts, gaming, etc. will be retroactively deemed to have unknowingly been transmen all along, depriving an entire generation of girls of strong female role models.
(griffxx)
They already have been at revistiionist history for a while. Did you know Joan of Arc was a trans man. Trans historians have gone back through Women's History and trans-manned anyone who dressed in men's clothing. Not taking into account, that it was the only way women could find work. And Queer Historians have queerified LG Liberation Movement and History. Thus erasing the contribution to Liberation Movement. Especially frustrating since straight ppl are calling themselves Queer.
(LisaArouet)
nd tomboy/butch girls will be forced to take hormones at 7 to become men. Because if you wear pants and play sports you’re a boy.
(WrongToy)
Men win. There's already engineers at Google who upon transition got promotions, and "diversity posts." The first senior engineer evah. Oh, they were very much into a prostitution type Twitter thing as well.
Of course, they'll take jobs away from women for the reasons you state. Women will play the Marthas and the wives enabling this.
Politically, less likely. I'm honestly not voting for someone who insists on being a woman when he's actually a man.
A small subset of "straight" men have a fetish for passable TiMs with "fully functional" equipment. For neovags, not so much. The Madame Butterfly thins is a myth. In Transdystopia, TiMs will have each other, maybe one with a penis, one with the neovag.
Surrogacy will go offshore as it has been. Really, that's among the most ridiculous exploitation there is.
In transdystopia, TiFs get into San Quentin, raped, then miscarry.
In transdystopia, older women are unwomen, unless they're Caitlyn Jenner.
Under his eye.
They can be feminist allies but never a feminist. There are plenty of reasons, too many to list. Here are a few main reasons,
They never experienced what women experienced. They are biologically different. They often think about their own gains, but selfishness is a tool of survival of the fittest and natural selection, all humans are selfish. That is a major reason they cannot be a feminist.
Trust issues are the number 1 obstacle from accepting males as feminists, it's difficult to accept a male as an ally, even harder to accept a male as a feminist.The word feminism comes from feminine and ism. It's female centric. There are no rules and laws to govern what a male feminist can or cannot do. We need a sovereign state / land for that.
Feminism is a lifestyle, you cannot turn it on or off easily. Males don't have the equipment and social atmosphere to engage in feminist conversations. Women are generally uncomfortable with men when we disagree with them, they might get angry or upset and that makes honest conversations difficult.
Most male feminists expect women to pay half in financial expenses, but women are at disadvantage, males should pay more than half. Male feminists are within a female-centric group, they must agree with female ideas to keep the male feminist label.
You can be an ally. You cannot be a feminist, that means having a voice in the fight for female liberation from male oppression. It makes no sense to give voice to men (the oppressors) in feminism (liberation from men)
Just like straight people can only be allies to the LGB. I'm bisexual, therefore those are my rights to fight for. You can be an ally. I'm white passing, but not white, so I do have a voice in ending institutional racism, but I need to always be mindful of my white passing privilege and I will never take up resources for PoC.
This happens more often than you guys think.
Spend any amount of time in the adult industry, and you'll see how fucked females truly are.
There is a reason there are 500 female pornstars to 1 male. In fact, tons of female pornstars complain about it, basically, 20 dudes get ALL the pussy in the porn industry.
Women are whores at the core.
I really don't know anymore. Yes, fads pass but this one is too much of a victory for patriarchy - access to women's spaces and resources, destruction of women's safety, ability to determine what is woman, reinforcement of gender roles (which had been in decline), feminism is dead cause now the most oppressed women are men, etc etc....
But, if it passes, my question is what does that mean to gender identity laws, that are quickly being adapted around the world? Will governments undo their politics of allowing men in women's spaces? Will they undo the laws that determine that self-determined gender identity overrules biological sex? I don't see that happening, like I said, it's too good for patriarchy to let go of.
Trans is not about men believing that they are women.
It is about men violating our boundaries, putting us in our lower place by reminding us that they hold our right to privacy, that they can revoke that right at anytime. That's why majority male governments are allowing men to violate our spaces. Men like to violate us.
In ten years, there won't be all of this upheaval from men LARPing as women. But the damage will have already been done. Men will have taken over everything that we gained for ourselves. I predict that men will take over our scholarships, teams, positions and they won't even attempt to look "feminine". It's being normalized. Men won't stop on their own and we won't stop them.
Honor really is a male abstraction, but not all men are honorable. The only difference is that women really have no need for honor and feminists work hard to ensure that remains the status quo.
A man without honor has to really walk a minefield to not have it all explode around him. Lies built on lies, schemes that could collapse any moment, dealing with loose ends, bullshitting answers at work constantly, etc. Hey, it's a skill learned like any other but there are MANY incentives for a man to walk life with honor rather than without (avoiding jail is a good one).
Women, on the other hand, have the pussy pass. This golden ticket allows them to do, essentially, whatever they want and the media/government just goes along with the ever-changing feminist narrative. It could range from crying her way out of a ticket to fat/slut shaming, paternity fraud for beta bux to false rape accusations, to the #MeToo phenomenon to cover up her dick-sucking interview skills. Such a pass kinda made sense when women had far fewer legal rights, but that time has long passed. Women are adults and children at the same time, whichever one benefits them at that moment.
Muslims were right all along, they just lack the economic opportunities but give it to them and I will take a place like the UAE over any Western country. In the West people often associate Muslims with crime but in Muslim countries there is very little crimes because they kill murderers and cut off rapists cocks and thieves hands, the problem in the West is not Muslims, its leftist justice laxism, weak weak justice that let criminals walk free.
Dystopian Trans Future (feel free to contribute)
What will happen in the future, once "transwomen" are fully recognized as women?
-They will take scholarships and programs spaces away from women, because of course their struggle to identify with femininity is more oppressive than anything a woman experienced
-They will take political office spaces away from women
-They will take jobs away from women. Why hire a biological woman, who might get pregnant and reduce efficiency, when you can hire a "woman", fill in that diversity quota, and get more efficient labor?
-Men will finally be convinced that "neovaginas are better than real vaginas." Due to all the plastic surgery to make "transwomen" look like porn stars (huge boobs, facial reconstruction, injections, perfect levels of estrogen), men will find "transwomen" more attractive as well, because they fit the stereotype of what a woman is supposed to look like. They have the added bonus of understanding what it was like to be a man too, so men will choose to have relationships with them instead of real women.
-Real women, out of jobs and out of relationships, will now be left to do one thing - being paid to reproduce. Men in relationship with transwomen will come to women and pay them to be surrogates (whether "artificial" or "natural" - basically, a prostitute that you impregnate)
Once again, men will find themselves in power, and finally find a way to push women back to what they think is their biological purpose - to reduce and to serve men.
What do you think will happen in a dystopian trans future?
The Denver International Airport conspiracy theories
I think this one is really interesting. It's infamous for its (now removed, some of them at least) creepy looking murals seemingly referring to future military oppression and a one-world government, gargoyles, a statue of Anubis, a 32 foot tall statue of a giant horse with fiery glowing eyes (which killed its sculptor when it fell on him), it's kinda shaped like a swastika, ties to the Freemasons and Templars. The list goes on.
I mean, who would feel safe at an airport while being greeted by this?
The fact that it exists in the first place boggles the mind of a lot of people since there is a perfectly capable one closer to downtown. Also it's twice the size of Manhattan and went $2 billion over budget.
One would think that if there would be something going on there they wouldn't be so on the nose with the imagery, that they'd be more inconspicuous about it, unless it's what people say about Area 51, that the conspiracy theories about it was put in the ether by the "government" itself to divert attention from somewhere else.
One of the more crazy stories I heard about it was someone taking the elevator to a level below ground only to find rows of urinals which were way too big for a normal human, he heard a sound, freaked out and hastily returned to the surface area. Lol, yeah...
So what are your opinions on this crazy place?
What rights do adults have to deny kids their sexuality?
Human beings are sexual beings, from conception.
Babies touch their genitals and feel good about it. So they repeat time and time again.
As they grow older, they continue to seek and find pleasure out of touching their bodies, they discover where and how they like to touch and be touched.
Preteens and pre-puberty kids are just absolutely curious about their bodies and of their piers male and female. They start having a lot of intentional pleasure by touching and rubbing themselves.
And obviously during puberty their sexuality flourishes, they do learn and seek pleasure out of sex.
So why do we insist that kids cannot have sex, feel pleasure and show themselves? They like it! Showing themselves is part of their sexuality, most do enjoy it . They show and they see. Kids are eager for porn, they learn through porn. And today kids have a lot more knowledge about sex and their bodies thanks to porn that is freely available.
A 13 year old boy does not always have the chance to see a naked 13 year old girl if not through porn. Why deny them this growing and learning experience?
If kids did not enjoy sex we would not find so many of them on Omegle and the likes. They are there. They want to show, they want to see, they want to have pleasure! It's their right.
Adults do not have the right to deny them this their right.
CMV: Children Should Be Allowed To Consent To Sex.
I think that children are capable of consenting to sexual contact with adults, and it's actually incredibly harmful to take that right away from them, and a violation of human rights. The normal arguments you hear against it are that the adult is always going to have more power in the relationship so it's inherently abusive, the child isn't ready for sex, developed enough, etc., and that there's too much risk for harm and anyone who isn't traumatized is an exception.
The idea that power dynamics makes a relationship inherently abusive is just outright wrong. Power dynamics only matter if the party with the power exercises it, and laws are an equalizer because they make there be reasons not to exploit power dynamics if empathy and compassion wasn't enough of a reason already. We only extend this idea of power dynamics to sexual situations with children, in all other areas it's actually expected and socially acceptable to exercise power against children (using hierarchy to get them to do what you want, physical punishment as deterrence, lack of consideration for their will, etc.).
Any sort of argument about development and puberty ignores the reason people have sex, people don't have sex just because hormones compelled them to do it, they have it because it's a pleasant and meaningful experience to achieve sexual release and increasingly so if someone you want to be involved is involved to. The idea that children aren't sexual creatures is to say they can't receive pleasure and have positive sexual experiences.
This is probably going to be the meatiest counter-argument that I have. I'll say it bluntly, no scientific evidence that uses unbiased samples (samples that represent the population as a whole) comes to the conclusion that willing sexual participation, or EVEN unwilling, is incredibly traumatic by itself. A study into the most impactful combinations of abuse on a child's happiness, finds that sexual abuse (defined as unwilling) isn't even in the top ten combinations of the most harmful abuse (Ney, Fung, & Wickett, 1994). Countless other studies find that early sexual experiences with adults are incredibly unlikely to cause lasting harm (Rind & Tromovitch, 1997; Rind et Al, 1998; Clancy, 2009) and other studies show that children who are willing participants in sex are statistically identical to the control group when it comes to issues of mental health (Arreola et Al, 2008; Arreola et Al, 2009). There's research that shows that minors who have first time experiences with adults have nearly indistinguishable experiences as minors with peers and adults with adults (Rind & Welter, 2014; Rind & Welter, 2016; Rind, 2017) and a study done of Finnish children that found that children are far more likely to report forced sexual contact than willing because they don't consider the willing sexual contact abuse (Lahtinen, 2018).
I personally see no reason to disallow child from having sexual freedom given all the research (there's more even) and find it immoral to deny them sexual freedom. I hope that having a conversation on a sub about reasonable discussions will bring me some actual solid and impactful evidence/arguments against rather than the usual moralistic squabble and argument avoidance of other places. I want an actual discussion about this and reasons why, in the presence of immense evidence that I believe is contrary, that children shouldn't be allowed to consent to sex, reasons the research is flawed, skewed, biased, or in anyway "junk science", or research that uses non-biased samples (i.e. not samples with a disproportionate amount of clinical patients) and come to the conclusion that sexual contact the child is willingly involved in is going to cause them some kind of lasting harm or problems. Thank you.
Re: If this post gets 100 upvotes, MDE will team up with GenderCritical to defeat the trannies
(heyshinobu)
GC is so close, yet so so far away from the truth. All they need to do is drop the feminist lenses and hey, whaddya know?
(Vercingetorixxx)
I've been posting there undercover for over a year now. The ones that aren't lesbos are a half step away from becoming tradwives. I posted a Social Matter article there and it got upvoted because they probably don't understand what NRx is. For anyone who wants to post there, don't disagree with anyone or say anything suspicious and you should be good.
(NO-STUMPING-TRUMP)
GenderCritical DESTROYS men in DRESSES using FACTS and LOGIC
(420upboatBLAZEit)
They also hate the same (((corporations))),(((government))) and (((culture)))
(vironian_)
(((wh*toid m*n))) for them unfortunately
but they also realise feminist men are faggot creeps who want sex as a reward so they're better than most
(johnyann)
It’s so easy. Just admit that gender is a human construct which means for the sake of classification we should ban the entire concept of them. Instead, let’s define by XX and XY and leave it at that.
This was suggested by a confused Chinese student in my required social justice seminar class freshmen year. It caused people and the professor to lose their fucking shit, but they had no response. Just autism.
(Lateknighttt)
Don't they also hate normal men, not only trannies?
They hate normal men have become. I do too.
(DannyDemotta)
^ The correct answer. They hate that most male feminists are either weak skeletons, fat lardos, or creeps just waiting for an opportune moment to hit on them.
Most men who have money, fame, and/or power don't want anything to do with average/plain-looking women. The men that would actually date these plain women don't get 2nd looks any more, because they're too this or too that, or don't have enough X, Y or Z. The majority of attractive women (especially in big cities) would rather share a man than have a beta bitch all to themselves, and I can't really blame them. I'd rather pay an escort than have some gelatinous blob all to myself.
(_no_exit_)
I've been aware of this group for awhile but never really bothered to do more than a cursory glance. Gave it a closer look and I'm honestly somewhat intrigued; they're using the same language that the degenerate left uses but uses it to undercut the degenerate part. I'd gladly ally with anyone who hangs around that circle.
(ClaireBear1123)
These folks are motivated by feelings of disgust and alienation. They are natural allies.
Even radfems can see how fucked things are.
(tryheroin69)
Femininity has been absolutely bastardized by mentally ill people, and mainstream media is supporting it. It's no surprise women who take pride in their femininity are unhappy with this.
Both the Guardian and Telegraph have been running a series on social media and the mental health of the young recently.
Both manage to (wilfully) miss the elephants in the room : 1) a pornsick generation of boys and young men demanding that they get to enact their sexual violence on women and girls plus the consequences of that for girl's and women's health and well being, and 2) the way that the transgenderists have created a cult that sucks in the most vunerable of these young women and then further abuses them by pulling them away from reality, denying them appropriate help and with the promise of glorious redemption by transing to their "true selves".
(Leetenghui)
Fuck it.... no seriously lets just buy the whole fucking city up and then drive them out of the city.
I can hear people say that's not OK. Why not? China towns exist because this is precisely what was done to us. We were forced to live in certain areas we weren't allowed to live anywhere we wanted.
Vancouver belongs to us now.
If you can't afford to buy it despite all your advantages in the work place then maybe you should work harder rather than smoking weed and drinking all day.
(wcet)
Asians are nice enough to pay to occupy. whites come in and pretend like they own everything and oppress the natives. No wonder squatting is part of their culture
(Leetenghui)
Agreed. It's why the South African "genocide" is so incredibly ironic.
Their ancestors stole the land and committed genocide and enslavement of the natives.
Now the land is being taken back to the rightful owners and they're crying genocide and land theft.
(chinesecanadianguy)
Western nations are always praising capitalism and when Chinese ppl do it better they cry foul.
(chilibun)
That dude is woke. Personally, I'd take it a step further and and agree with Leetenghui (the reddit user, not the politician xD). We need to stop caring about what people think about us. If anything, knowing I make some racist white people mad makes me feel all happy inside. Fuck them.
You act like I told them to become massively over represented in the institutions pushing anti-white shit. Jews, at least Ashkenazi Jews, have a relatively high average IQ (somewhere between 105 and 115), and a very high amount of nepotistic networking which has allowed them to become incredibly over represented in higher level social, economic, and political institutions in historically white countries, and most recently the United States. Them pushing multiculturalism nonsense is just them acting in their own ethnic self-interest. Jews are obsessed with the holocaust as a foundational property of their modern identity, and think that eradicating any sense of white identity, and flooding our countries with non-whites makes it harder for them to stand out and be singled out as a group. To them whites are the ultimate threat, even if in the long term this may not be true. And before you say they just care about equality look at this poll on affirmative action. Jewish support for affirmative action increases when the policies are framed as if they harm whites rather than if they help minorities.
(tealsandwich)
Feminine FTMs wanting to be gay men makes no sense. Please explain. And is rapid onset gender dysphoria valid?
How can someone who has lived comfortably under societal guidelines for their sex suddenly decide, “I’m the opposite!”? A girl with all female friends who has an incredibly female socialization, and “fits in” solidly into the median of what society embraces as woman has no understanding of manhood. The best she can do is create an internalized framework of what a man amounts to. This framework is based on external observation. Media portrayal, popular culture, male family members and friends (if any). There’s no acknowledgement or conscious perception that this internalized framework is a product of environmental agents. With rapid onset gender dysphoria (ROGD), the desire to change genders is based on a vision that is a caricature of the opposite sex’s experience and essence.
Conversely, a girl who from an early age has played exclusively with boys, displayed masculine mannerisms and deviates from the median societal expectation of femininity is a legitimate claimant, if that’s her inclination. The interesting thing is that many women who understand men’s experience and “know” what it’s like to feel like a man have no desire to be men.
Isn’t it strange then that the girl who has no experience with men or any understanding beyond caricature wants to be a boy? Meanwhile the woman who knows men IRL and understands their experience is happy with being a woman?
(This is the same for TiM/MTF individuals)
My question is, why?
(11strangecharm)
I've met a number of feminine FTMs, and they are usually straight (sometimes bi) women who fetishize gay men. They then complain about how "phallocentric" gay men are (I shit you not). Partly they may be seeking to be able to have a relationship with a man without that undercurrent (or more) of misogyny to contend with, too. They usually assume I identify as a man on sight because of my hair and how I dress. (Yep, that's real progressive for straight women to assume the lesbian must want to be a man. Shit like that in the QT community contributed to alienating me from being proud as a gender non-conforming woman as I was raised to take pride in my nonconformity to hating my physical body and sexed organs and getting a referral to an endocrinologist I fortunately never could get to.)
(notfairwayfrank)
I think it has a lot to do with how things that get girls judged as dumb and superficial are seen as making boys cool and special. Imagine trying to be David Bowie, but female. It's a real drag. Young women trying to figure it all out can fall into this trap because actual self-acceptance receives so little support.
(meupandaa)
I'm pretty sure feminine ''gay'' trans''men'' would stop suffering from ''dysphoria'' if they stopped consuming yaoi porn
(x__why)
Most FTMs I know have been victims of horrible sexual abuse. I think there’s an element of rejecting traits associated with pain and abuse. I think there’s also not fitting in with societal expectations (enjoying STEM, sports, etc) and not living in an environment affirming of those preferences.
I think the way you’ve framed the issue makes it hard to be relatable. I think most TiMs and FiMs have dysphoria making it emotionally difficult to come to terms with physical realities.
For all the things I do not like about TRAs and the toxicity of the movement, I do think these are people who deserve some empathy for going through tough things.
TIL
Years ago in a bar I was having a drink with two war buddies. We're sitting there, bullshitting, having a beer or two, and one of my friends says hello to a girl he knew from college. She comes over and chit chats with him for a few minutes and is introduced to the other two of us. Of course, she calls another one of her friends over (presumably to hook her friend up) with one of us. Her friend comes over and pulls up a bar stool to our table and wants to chirp in on our conversation. After telling us she works at "wherever", she asks us:
"So you guys have been to combat, right? So, if you can take the life of a child in war, don't you think that's the same thing as Abortion?"
Now, I want you to imagine a girl who's easily a decent '8' on the looks scale. Makeup, high maintenance, great body, nice skin, the whole package. Now imagine the dumbest sounding girl you've ever seen. Like the girls that do the news segments on campuses because they're protesting "whatever". That was this girl. Just absolutely the dumbest piece of shit I've ever seen.
One of my buddies couldn't believe she asked us that. I spoke up and said "We're not having this conversation. Guys, don't even respond. We're NOT doing this. You can go away now. We're done here."
Little Miss Abortion justifier gets VISIBLY butthurt about being rejected. Tries to badger us into a nonsensical argument to justify abortion versus collateral damage in Iraq. We refuse to debate or talk to her and shut her down. My friend finally tells her "Look, leave us alone to drink our beers and seek life elsewhere. I'm gonna throw a fuckin' drink in your face if you don't leave us alone"
She became UNGLUED, and started hysterically yelling about us not wanting to talk to her. Her friend finally pulled her away from the table as we told her to get her away from us.
That was my "realizing" moment. I realized that this dumb broad had never been rejected by some guys that were decent looking (I'm not Christian Bale or anything, but I did well...). For that matter, she'd probably never been told "No" at any point ever in her life. It changed how I perceived women that have zero personalities who manipulate men because men are simps that put pussy on the pedestal. Women don't face nearly ANY rejection from men. It was oddly satisfying, even in that moment to see a hot girl who has NOTHING to offer but her pussy to Chad and Tyrone, get shut down for probably the first time in her life.
I'm not entirely sure it's fair to make the judgement that 'we' are treating them a certain way when reservations were set up with the goal of Indian tribes acting as 'independent sovereigns'. The best thing that could happen for these tribes is complete integration into the US and a redaction of tribal sovereignty. I suppose that wouldn't sit well with some people however.
"One band of unhinged radical feminists from Lorena’s native Ecuador threatened what they called ‘emasculation terrorism,’ in which they would cut off the penises of ten American men for every year of Mrs Bobbitt’s prison sentence, if she was jailed".
I really wish these types of groups would try that kind of thing in Mexico. The U.S. is so noble and kind, it tries to avoid violence at all cost..... in Mexico however, violence is met with superior violence.
BLM, antifa, SJW/feminism.... I yearn to see them attempt their bullshit here. It's going to be legendary.
Are you from Mexico?
Yep. Born, raised and will die here.
Would you mind sharing what those groups are perceived like where you live?
Most people don't know or care ... and those that do know, have no opinion. Mexico has a very strong and very pervasive attitude of "leave me alone and I leave you alone" , so groups like BLM, antifa and SJW/feminism would have zero chance of success here, doubly so if they try the use of violence.
As I said before, violence here is met with superior violence. BLM riots would get massacred, literally. Antifa groups would.... probably get captured, tortured and then killed one by one.
It is very , VERY not advisable to try that kind of violence here..... even muslims , when about 15,000 were here due to Obama's dumbfuckery, knew better than to start any trouble. Mexico is not europe or the U.S.... we do not have the kind and noble attitude that you guys have. Anyone that starts shit at that level is going to take a dirt-nap real quick....
The term “fuck you” is not an insult for nothing, men know why – it’s the worst thing you can do to a human being. It is in itself an extremely physically invasive act, very often painful, generally at the beginning before the pain may be cut off by the genital arousal; causes all sorts of tears, bruises, swelling, discomfort, STDs, vaginal infections, urinary infections, genital warts, HIV and death.
Not to forget the additional sado-gynecological interventions/ costs of PIV-maintenance, and all the secondary physical mutiliation and financial costs that go with our duty to make ourselves look decorative for male sexual consumption – such as hair removal, make-up, starvation or forced feeding, torturous limb deforming or cutting up, etc I mean, think about it, the very act is invasive by nature.
When I voice my opinions among libtards I always hear “PIV as rape trivialises real rape victims” and “but, but, I like sex and you’re insulting women or men who like sex” and “you’re just doing sex the wrong way”. But the thing is, the word consent is meaningless when the very purpose of violence is to inflict something on you that you don’t want and that’s against your interest. All women get raped in a patriarchy, even by libfem standards.
Since my statement is so hard to understand... The question of "what if she's a lesbian" is designed to scare straight wimmin by promoting the pernicious myth that we lesbians are predatory (especially if it makes us basically the same as men). Also as if straight females aren't just as likely as lesbians, if not more likely than, to dishonor the female body. But anyone who is a lesbian or knows lesbians understands that the female body is sacred to many lesbians and why would we want to harm something that is held sacred. If a lesbian has devoted her life to healing females, chances are good that she's probably spiritual about it. I can think of a handful of lesbians who fit this criteria.
Edit: to add, that straight females are more likely to perpetuate harm to the female body - token torture and femininity rituals, for instance
TLDR a lesbian is more likely to hold female biology as sacred and this translates into being a good doctor, GET OVER IT
Which can be distilled to the male practice of projection. As we know, women are biologically incapable of loving a man the way a man loves a woman. As such, men fall into a trap when they project the traits of their idealized love onto their woman, who not only has no idea what he sees, but does not have any intention of fulfilling any of his ideals.
I probably don't have a whole lot of room to talk on this forum, but I've definitely earned my stripes out there in the real world. I've tried to save strippers, suicidal girls, watched my own high school sweetheart get pumped and dumped by Chad not once, but twice (baby daddies and all, and yeah, we talked about having kids one day), had to pay hookers just to feel normal. Just to feel like there's not something horribly fucking wrong with me.
I've fallen truly and deeply in love with women who couldn't be faithful. I cared about them...wanted better for them. Protected them. Provided for them. This forum does a pretty good job killing the blue pill but honestly it dresses shit up and tries to find a happy median too often. Women will never be faithful forever. I don't care how tight your game is. They CAN'T. Don't expect it and you won't get burned.
All that marriage, house, kids, long term relationship goals, the fairy tale ending?? It's HER job to worry about that shit. Your job as a man is to build and enjoy your life and to fuck her. That's all. Stop putting your heart out there, foreal. You don't have anything if you aren't fucking, there's nothing to talk about or waste your time thinking about. So care about fucking her first (and only) and let these little girls worry about all that other shit.
TL:DR Stop building castles in the sky. We get it, you're a good guy and you want a family one day. Stop holding onto that mushy shit and do your goddamn job. Stop torturing yourself, just fuck her or don't.
Funny how the majority of lesbians have gotten raped. It's almost as if their "sexual preference" is a psychological reaction to their forced sex with a man.
People are Googling "lesbian bed death"
Re: Chinese never learn: high demand for white teachers. Parents: "as long as there is a foreigner"
(jubeininja)
White worshipping idiots.
When will they ever learn?
Until all the white men take all their women then maybe they wake up.
(Colin-TXJ)
China decided to hire over 100 thousands Filipino teachers. They are more qualified and way better than those immature,selfish,irresponsible and egotistic whining white ESL teachers.
Morden people are influnenced by media to a certain extent. If mass media had a heavier focus on reporting how fucked up those white LBHs are, people would be aware of the problem.
(killingzoo)
I sometimes think that such things are good in some ways:
It used to be that White Rich people had a status thing when they hired a "foreign nanny" or "foreign tutor" for their kids.
So, maybe it's good that Chinese people hired loser White kids to be their kids' tutors and nannies. Then we end up with a whole generation of Chinese kids going around making fun of white people by saying "I had a loser tutor like you, and he was all F*ed up."
Then, there is the inevitable wasting life away from the White losers. Nothing worse than being paid by Rich people to burn your life away.
Seriously, do ESL teachers actually get better careers after all those years in Asia?
If we actually cataloged all the loser ESL teachers that Asia burned over the years.... I feel like this is going to be a very useful museum.
(tt598)
Original article: http://www.chinanews.com/sh/2018/07-25/8578766.shtml
"I can also cultivate my children's international vision and understand multiculturalism"
Funny that they are never interested in the culture of Korea, or Thailand or Kazakhstan or India.
(AmerikkkaIsFuked)
This is so freaking stupid. Didnt China recently agree to bring in a ton of Philipino English teachers? I hope they realize what is going on, Filipinos and Indians can teach way better and will be 100 times more motivated than these white sexpats
(sadeurasianguy)
This is the reason why shit like this happens
They are millions of Filipinos are who are fluent, who can teach English to the Chinese students, also China can hire Asians who are from the West as well.
You're spot on. Most cold war propaganda about the Soviet Union is regurgitated directly from Nazi propaganda. It's quite simple really. Always suspect what biased people have to say about anything. Including Communists.
Stalin was undoubtedly a harsh man but consider if he was not harsh? What if Stalin had been laxadaisacal about the industrialisation of the Soviet Union? The truth is the Nazis would have butchered 100's of millions of people rather than than the 20 million they got away with before they were destroyed.
In regards to the purges I mostly put the crimes of that era down to internal sabotage and mass hysteria. Stalin definitely shares some of the responsiblity. But I would argue that some purge of the Communist party was necessary and inevitable.
Here's a decent video series in regard to the purges if you want more information.
Follow the sources referenced if you want more information or just research about it here.
Stalin was a rare kind of leader, incredibly smart and able to inspire everyone he talked to. As he admits, he wasn't the best theorist but he absolutely shined in applying socialism correctly and never compromising with class enemies. Not perfect for sure, as he failed to recognize how strong a threat to socialism can grow within the party itself.
A woman will NEVER be happy with you long term. It is irrelevant if you're Alpha, Chad or Tyrone. Yes, women will flock in droves to fuck you, but once you enter into a doomed from the start relationship with one, then begins the manipulation, nagging, pouting, lying, temper tantrum throwing, moodiness and ultimatum giving daughter of Satan you were hoping to avoid.
By nature a woman is restless, ergo - she is eternally unhappy. She will grind away on you to make you the man she envisions you to be. IF she accomplishes her task, she will no longer be attracted to you! Don't ever forget: There is NO winning with women, only differing degrees of losing.
A lot of people here refrences Latin America, and I would also point to ashkenazi jews. In fact, because there was a flow of individuals in and out the jews did become smarter than Asians. They are also a good example of why we should try to avoid mixing. Jews didn't really belong anywhere so they spent a few millenia roaming europe and getting kicked out of places periodically. They did manage to maintain strong blood ties, but because that wasn't bound to any soil they didn't really create anything. Now that they have essentially become a race I am glad that they are settling down in Israel and hope them the best when they get there.
Americans are a mix of genetically similar people, but a mix none the less. Because our ancestors were similar it was easier to keep most of a common heritage and fill in the rest, and even then it only really worked because we stole land from indians. Without any new land a mixed race will cause conflict either within a country it doesn't belong in, or when it tries to make its own place.
(qwep-mi)
My wife may have fucked over 200 guys when she was younger
But clearly those guys werent good enough since im the lucky guy she married.
(Rambocel)
She was just finding herself dont slut shame
(General_Duggah
I feel like normie and new fags get tricked into upvoting your comment thinking you aren't being sarcastic.
(thumpar72)
Im kekking merely imagining it
(incelsinterlinked)
Just finding her super-STDs more like.
Better get a c section for your kids so they don’t catch something sliding out.
(Salvador66)
IT cucks in a nutshell.
(warmestblack)
It is feminist thinking. Females trying to be males. They think their high N count experiences somehow make them more valuable to men. Maybe they’re coping by trying to frame it this way. And just lol at the men who fall/cope for this. News flash you stupid whores. Men want you in your prime, and high N counts are repulsive.
(satansbarbedcock)
The fact that they think getting fucked is an acomplishment is truly amazing.
As amazing as them thinking, against all evidence, that fucking hundreds of men has no negative effect on their personality, character or ability to pair bond
nooo3949
Men want you in your prime
For foids, there really is no prime. They can get a man any time they want at any age.
(FACEandLMS)
Think of it this way:
It doesn't matter how many guys licked the icing off this cake: I'm the one who gets to take it home 15 years later.
(AdventTrooper)
wOmYn aRe NoT cAkEs FoR yOu To CoNsUMe
(EvanTheFactMerchant9
Now you get to lick their icing off the cake
(LDAR_666)
200 guys
LOL this is cope. The average thot has fucked 200 guys by 9th grade. By the time they marry a betabux the number is well over 1000
(INCELMAN2000)
> The average thot has fucked 200 guys by 9th grade.
Cope level: Length of average BBC, average girl has fucked 2000 guys by preschool.
(EvanTheFactMerchant)
Sperm are the ultimate orbiters. Millions of them rushing to one egg all at once, desperate to be the one. Hypergamy starts before conception. It's fucking over.
(AggresiveCuck6)
Try 2000. You are in a fantasy land if you think girls reserve themselves that much
James Flynn, famous for the Flynn effect (increase in both fluid and crystallized intelligence test scores measured in many parts of the world over the 20th century), believed that it might be less then 50% and wanted to do studies to prove this and even liberal universities wouldn't fund it. Hmmm. I wonder why a liberal university wouldn't want to prove IQ could be more environmental? Wouldn't that help their narrative? Well it's probably because regardless of their public stances that there are no races and IQ doesn't matter they privately KNOW IQ is genetic and ANY future research will just make that more and more obvious (and prove that they were dead wrong when they drove Rushton and Murray out of academia).
We welcome 100s of studies showing the flexibility of IQ (if they are well designed). The alt right isn't about science denial. It's the opposite of that. We are not trying to push IQ science into the public limelight because we think it shows whites are superior. We are pushing it into the limelight because we are forced to live a lie everyday from both liberals and conservatives that it doesn't exist at all and that it doesn't have any bearing on how we plan society and doll out welfare and managed immigration. This is a HUGE lie. This is the emperor with no clothes. The bell curve effect of IQ, even if it's flexible, shows there are significant differences between races especially as you get out to the edges and these desperately need to be taken into account when trying to create and perpetuate a prosperous society.
In fact studies showing it has flexibility would get you kicked out of most SJW circles because SJW's deny IQ in its entirety. How can you show in a study that it's flexible if there's no such thing as IQ in the first place?
The environmental factor of IQ also shows how important schooling is and how important it is for us to resegregate schools. A 73 IQ sub saharan african with the right schooling, nutrition and motivation might be able to able to crack the bare minimum of military acceptance: 83. But that child will hurt jewish, white and asian kids with 100 plus IQ.
Even accounting for flexibility of IQ, desegregation and forced diversity is a losing game for everyone INCLUDING sub saharans who would be miserable in homogenous white or jewish school with kids who are reading in kindergarten. (which is why jews are frequently putting their kids in private school). In fact jewish and white politicians both will put their kids in prestigious high quality private schools with similar IQ cohorts while voting for shitty desegregated public schools for the rest of us. It's a goddamn fraud.
Unfortunately many whites don't have the finances to put their kids into homogenous private school. You are only proving to us that importing all these low IQ blacks and hispanics is part of a long term plan to reduce white IQ (because whites are the most effected).
Jews actually popularised rock, jazz, rap, speed metal etc as ways of attacking traditional culture. Their initial goal was to spread atheism, they did this with 'satanist' bands that weren't actually satanists but did promote atheism and made kids think it's cool to hate christianity, then when their retarded parents were like 'OMG THEY'RE WORSHIPPING SATAN' it made them think 'lol christians so dumb'.
Later on when christianity was dealt with they had no reason to continue spreading atheism so they instead promoted black culture to wash away with any sort of class and morality left in the culture. Instead they promote hatred for police, violence, drugs, meaningless sex etc.
The music industry is on par with, if not worse than, hollywood.
