www.reddit.com

Readytodie85 #fundie reddit.com

All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell

Some incels #sexist #psycho reddit.com

Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.

image

(C0nserve)

I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come

Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already

(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.

Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.

(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.

(Deoxysxx)

I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father

I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.

Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.

(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.

And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.

His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.

(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks

COCAINE___waffles #conspiracy reddit.com

The only thing i can think of is a promise of little interference or something comparable that would make whatever their ultimate goal is, easier.

Maybe we trade in raw materials that they would need like gold or gases that would be more of a hassle for them to mine directly in exchange for tech that to them may be antiquated but for us light years ahead.

The scariest but most plausable thought in my mind, just basing it off the fact of the number of reported abductions every year would probably be our medical records. Clearly if the abductions are true, then they are looking for something. without our detailed records that contain our medical family histories, blood types or possibly some genetic quirk they would be interested in, they would have to resort to plucking us at random until they got enough of what they wanted over time. They could shave decades of work off by cooperating with us. Just my 2 cents

Hogkbar #conspiracy reddit.com

UFO Disclosure and why it hasn't happened yet. Our best pilots and officers during WW2 reported seeing (Foo Fighters) Not Dave's band. I mean UFO's. And they were seen in big numbers. Why?

Well Earth was embroiled in a World War. We also were making HUGE leaps in technology. Rockets, Radar, and Nuclear Weapons. This brought us a lot of attention from "Others". Hence the spike in sightings. A few years later, the best place to view these new Earth technologies was in one relative place, New Mexico. Now being the "This is new to us. We should hit it with a hammer" race that we are, were able to (after many tries) actually hit upon a radar configuration that would mess with the guidance systems of these craft. Hence Roswell. We actually brought down 3 craft that day using that same configuration. And we immediately snatched up everything and began to backwards engineer them.

You may or may not know about the fleets of these craft as they buzzed Washington with Truman in office. But that's a bit later. When the Army Brass found out that we not only had crashed vehicles and at least one living being, they asked the President what they should do. The President was Eisenhower. He wisely decided "Let's stick em where know one can know about them until we ourselves actually know more. Wise. Always.

Now the tragic part. When President Eisenhower asked for detailed reports and updates of the incident, he was stonewalled. This prompted him to send out 2 CIA (maybe still OSS agents who were told by Ike "Fly out there and knock on the door. Then demand to be shown what was going on. Tell them if they give the two of you any problems whatsoever, that the Big Red 1 was ready to roll in and make the entire base one huge flat piece of land, and any employees that survived were to face treason charges.

Well. Ike got the whole picture. Which boiled down to this. The M.I.C. (Military Industrial Complex)went to their real masters, "Big Energy" first. They then asked them what should be done. Even before they asked the President. Big Energy's answer was "Bury it". You see. The energy is so abundant that these craft use, that a simple 12 ounces of it contains enough energy to evaporate all the water on our planet. But by then the genie was out of the bottle. Not only was the NSA created. It was given the power to take any money from any budget and never have to give a reason. This was not what Eisenhower intended. In his farewell speech to our nation, he did not reminisce about WW2 or the more recent Korean Conflict. No. He spent the entirety of his farewell address to this nation warning us of the Military Industrial Complex. Odd for a man of such achievements to be so worried leaving office with all the foxes in the hen house.

What it has degenerated into is Unacknowledged Special Access Programs. Which are illegal. We have completely legal Special Access Programs, but they have oversight. They have "Watchmen". Unacknowledged Special Access Programs have no such by oversight. No accounting to anyone. And as I sit here, I swear to you they have taken over this beautiful country of ours. Because not only can they do whatever they want under the guise of National Security, they can take as much money as they want too do it.

So the reason they haven't come out and said it is not because the people will be "outraged". They have hidden UFO's because the energy that people are making billions from, would be obsolete over night. Now. You want to know why we don't have an "official disclosure"? Well you are wrong. The ENTIRE FRENCH GOVERNMENT HAS MADE, AND IS IN, CONTACT WITH OUTSIDERS TO THIS MINUTE. Do your own research on the most reputable places you get reliable info from. The French Government made contact on their own. And they have kept nothing secret. Look for yourself.

It's not Aliens that they are afraid will panic us into rioting mobs in the street. It's the fact that the energy these intergalactic ships run on is infinite. It would get us off the Petro-Dollar immediately. THAT MY FRIENDS is why this has been kept hidden. Even from many Presidents. But there is hope. Because entities that exist using no oversight, and are not bound to inform our President and Congress, are illegal! Any oaths. Any NDA's, they are all illegal and cannot be enforced. Hence the rash of whistleblowers.

The M.I.C. Has one card left to play though. How do you turn a Billion dollar business into a trillion dollar business. How do you flip the script and become heroes? If your business is war, then you need a bigger enemy. I have much much more, in very granular detail, about all of this. But for now, I will leave you with what the 2nd in charge of Lockheed (That's "The Man" with a capital T and a capital M) said upon his retirement speech. Among the tidbits he left the packed room of well over a hundred people were...

"We now have the technology to take ET home".

he also said.... "We are 60 to 100 years ahead of anything the general population can even imagine".

And the last tidbit he left was: "Interstellar space travel is no longer a problem for us".

Now Lockheed got the power to reverse engineer the crashed (Shot down) craft. They invented the Fluxliner. Do your own research. There's an entire film from a documentary maker that was made about it. And he was of unquestionable repute. He was also diagnosed with the fastest cancer anyone had ever seen. Now these craft supposedly use Mercury as a main component of travel. We all have some small amount of Mercury in all of us. Now she this film maker was autopsied, it was discovered that the heavy metals were all spiked well above normal. Except Mercury. There wasn't any in his entire corpse. A message?

Now Lockheed has progressed over 50 years with this tech and as you can imagine, have come quite far from the ancient Fluxliners we first designed. Now look up the TR-3B. Also by Lockheed. And here's where I scare you and truly hope to wake even just a few of you up to what's going on. The technology exists to stage a false UFO invasion. This may not only double the M.I.C., but it very may triple it. There is SO MUCH more I can tell you. And if you are sincere, and get in touch with me, I will answer any questions you have such as I can. It's not the Aliens scaring us. It's free energy scaring Big Energy.

Before you even get in touch with me, I ask you to watch The Disclosure Project". Both parts one and two. Look at the impeccable credentials of the people who will gladly, and at the risk of their own lives, testify in front of Congress. Never before had such a class of insiders, and world leaders, and High ranking military and intelligence employees has ever come out in force like this. Of course, 9/11 happened 4 days later.

For the VERY LAST NUGGET (I promise), a former deputy of chief of the CIA was going to give us a suitcase sized box. Free of charge. That when installed, would not only eliminate your energy bill forever, but it would actually feed energy into the grid itself. Unfortunately, he never made the meeting where the handoff was to take place, and after 4 days of searching for him, he was found floating down the Potomac River.

Please wake up. For all of our sakes. Just don't dismiss this as bullshit. Research on your own on your trusted sources of information. It is now more important than ever we come together and demonstrate the goodness in all of us. Because of where we are technology-wise, and because we have killed over 200 million of our own people (and that's just war), our entire planet has been put on quarantine. Now more than ever is the time we say "Hey! We really aren't such a bad bunch. We have been manipulated. And we are sure that with benevolent mentorship, we can contribute to whatever you've got going out there.

I am a man who has very reliable sources. I start all my research from a point of trying to disprove any alien theories. I have finally come to the realization that the alarm has gone off, and we have hit the "Snooze" button several times. We need to get up. For any others interested in this... Well... Let's just say I can fundamentally change your world view. Contact me.

islandofdelight #conspiracy #ufo reddit.com

The various agencies of the government are very compartmentalized, so that most only have a piece of the story. The ones with the most 'truth' in government are usually the ones with the most harmful intent.

The Bushes, the Clintons, Kissinger, Cheney, Rumsfeld, the Royal families, and various departments within NSA, CIA and other intelligence agencies... these people are fully aware and participants of the Secret Space Program, having been well established in space travel and advanced technologies, and regularly cooperate with negative ET races at the expense of mankind's positive development.

Events like the Roswell are nothing but distraction compared to the interactions that some leaders have had, including deals made by Nazis in 1940's, and also by President Eisenhower and other world leaders. ETs have been interacting with humans long before modern times, creating both positive and negative consequences. Our situation now is the result of many bad choices made by world leaders in modern times. There are also positive groups now here influencing world events and the truth will soon be known.

fschmidt #fundie reddit.com

[Comment under "Why not suicide?"]

If we are going to discuss abstract, open-ended questions, then I will give an abstract, open-ended answer. And that is, far better to take many normie scum with you than to just die alone. Of course I am just speaking abstractly and theoretically. But somehow I don't think reddit is really interested in the difference between the abstract and the concrete, so I suggest that this entire thread simply be deleted.

UnbiasedPashtun #fundie reddit.com

I'm not afraid of them, just against them promoting their lifestyle. The homosexual identity was invented in the late 19th century in Germany. It is a completely modern concept that did not exist historically. Before that, sodomy was simply considered an act like masturbation. This whole gay identity is just modern Western liberal stuff.

They have a higher rate of mentall illness (even in societies like the Netherlands where it's considered normal), higher STD rate, higher pedophilia rate, non-existent birth rate, etc. Remember, they are recruiters not reproducers. They want to recruit people and with the help of the liberal media are brainwashing people into having the fixed identity of "gay".

Na7Soc #conspiracy reddit.com

[Comment under "Fact"]

Hitler was right and just.

Jewish commissars like Lazar Kaganovich, Genrikh Yagoda (Him and his Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system) and Yezhov had an active Jewish wife making all of their spawn racial Jews. Just Yagoda was responsible for killing at least 10,000,000 people. Their Cheka in total killed upwards of 80+ million people.

Yet FDR recognized the USSR his first year in office and immediately established aid programs to develop the troubled agrarian state into an industrial power which in turn supported Mao in the Chinese Civil War which the League of Nations said "Originated in Moscow" and cabled Roosevelt to ask him to "use his new ally Stalin to stop (the civil war in China).

Franklin Roosevelt actually demanded that Chiang Kai Shek allow Communists in government or lose all US economic and military aid. Chiang had an emergency meeting with his generals who said to commit an all out attack on Mao's forces and sent them on their 1000 mile march into Soviet territory thinking if they were no longer in China that would negate his demand but it just made FDR even more angry. FDR says "There is no threat here in Communism, some of my best friends are Communists" while Dean Acheson at Harvard literally says "There is no inherent obstacle to implementing (Marxist) Socialism in America through a series of New Deals".

The United States had it's first Communist President under Franklin Roosevelt. All of the damn near a hundred new bureaucracies he created were hotbeds of Communist recruitment, infiltration, and assignment. The 67th Congressional Investigation discovered that the Institute of Pacific Relations was a hotbed for communist infiltration, sending Communist Jews like Solomon Adler to back up Harry Dexter White and Henry Morgenthau with their plan to crush Chiang's economy by illegally fixing the price of gold and silver which they later had to legalize. Solomon Adler used US Embassies to pass out propaganda to the Chinese calling Chiang a "Dictator for not allowing ALL Chinese representation in government" (Denying Communists) and the only way to fix it is to side with Mao against Chiang and secure US Economic/Military aid again.

The media also didn't report it when Mao's bandits attacked Japanese controlled Manchuria (which was a big deal because without their mainland assets Japan would have to go back to being third world again unable to industrialize, so they had an emergency military meeting and decided that Chiang was not capable of dealing with the Communists and since he was refusing Japanese help since he saw that as the first step to China becoming a vassal of Japan they would deal with the Communists themselves.

Western media portrayed it as Japanese Imperialism/Expansionism and totally neglected to mention the Soviet troop/tank presence in China supporting Mao.

And so this is why they had to invent the holocaust in order to create the false argument that we had to ally with Stalin since he is the "lesser of evils. It was clear that we were not fighting a just war and Britain had to invent what their Ministry of Intelligence called "Atrocity propaganda. Here is their letter to the Church and BBC demanding that they act convincing and passionate pushing these lies

Sir, I am directed by the Ministry to send you the following circular letter: It is often the duty of the good citizens and of the pious Christians to turn a blind eye on the peculiarities of those associated with us. But the time comes when such peculiarities, while still denied in public, must be taken into account when action by us is called for. We know the methods of rule employed by the Bolshevik dictator in Russia itself from, for example, the writing and speeches of the Prime Minister himself during the last twenty years. We know how the Red Army behaved in Poland in 1920 and in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Galicia and Bessarabia only recently. We must, therefore, take into account how the Red Army will certainly behave when it overruns Central Europe. Unless precautions are taken, the obviously inevitable horrors which will result will throw an undue strain on public opinion in this country. We cannot reform the Bolsheviks but we can do our best to save them — and ourselves — from the consequences of their acts. The disclosures of the past quarter of a century will render mere denials unconvincing. The only alternative to denial is to distract public attention from the whole subject. Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately the public is no longer so susceptible as in the days of the “Corpse Factory,” and the “Mutilated Belgian Babies,” and the “Crucified Canadians.” Your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your wholehearted support of various charges against the Germans and Japanese which have been and will be put into circulation by the Ministry. Your expression of belief in such may convince others. I am, Sir, Your obedient servant, (signed) H. HEWET, ASSISTANT SECRETARY The Ministry can enter into no correspondence of any kind with regard to this communication which should only be disclosed to responsible persons.

This letter is reproduced in a 1958 book entitled Allied Wartime Diplomacy: A Pattern in Poland by Edward J. Rozek, the image above is captured from the first edition (pages 209-210).

You can learn more about this greasy British action and the history behind it here

amancalledfroggy #fundie reddit.com

Liberals and their human rights ideas are like cancer and communism. They spread. The sad fact is the vast majority of people are weak minded, unsophisticated and gullible. By jailing and oppressing a few of these evangelical hippies you frighten the rest into keeping quiet. LKY was excellent at that.

rhinoqueen123 #conspiracy reddit.com

Judges, and lawyers are sovereign citizens.

Judges, and lawyers use the sovereign citizen tactic when they get pulled over by the police, or when they are in court standing trail for the usual things those class of people do- paedophilia, rape, murder, theft; crimes involving harming another person, which are violations of natural, and common law, not just violations of commercial law such as a speeding ticket, which is what the run of the mill person exercises their sovereign citizen status for.

But then these same people get on message boards, like this one, and write "sovereign citizens are stupid, ignorant, morons". The reason they do this is because within their dark arts profession they are taught how to tap into their Cestui Que Vie trust, and withdraw equity to buy a house, car etc but they don't want outsiders to know how to do it, nor even that it exists, so when an outsiders comes into their court room, they can rape them for Cestui Que Vie trust equity.

And for the non judges/lawyers etc here is the Uniform Commercial Code 2010-2011 edition:

https://www.scribd.com/document/75735825/Uniform-Commercial-Code-2010-2011-Ed

Mastering theUniform Commercial Code

https://www.scribd.com/document/49192374/Mastering-The-Uniform-Commercial-Code-With-Forms-The-Application-Of-Commercial-Law-Under-The-Uniform-Commercial-Code-2004

personal_liberty #conspiracy reddit.com

Hey guys, I wrote a book on "the right to travel". If there is any case to be made for the sovereign citizens, I think this book is the best chance.

Greetings!

I am writing this correspondence to inform people that I am finally disseminating a project that I have been working on for the last few years. I have now published a book that I have written: Of Personal Liberty, The Truth of Motor Vehicle Infractions. If you have any time to spare, I’d greatly appreciate your audience for my work.

What is my book about? Well, first off, I want to assert that my book is NOT a discussion about how to get out of traffic tickets. Rather and more importantly, my book aims to examine the legitimacy of traffic tickets, and in doing so teach people fundamental principles of law that everyone should know.

At its core, my book is a discussion about freedom—in practical use. Specifically, the book enunciates the fact that if a person is free, they don’t need to ask for anyone’s permission before inclining to act. Americans today no longer practice freedom: it is illegal for us to do anything of sustenance unless we first acquire a ‘license’ or ‘permit’ (permission) from the government.

One of the many freedoms that have been deprived from Americans is their right to freely travel upon the highways. For a long time, we have been told that “driving is a privilege”, but this is a grave misnomer. My central thesis is that people should not be forced to obtain a license (ask government’s permission) nor meet other prerequisites before being allowed to privately travel upon the highways.

Our country’s backbone was designed to support a free society. Requiring everyone to get a driver’s license before they can travel upon the highways has led to a form of scoliosis; Constitutional provisions have been grossly reinterpreted, and basic principles of fairness (due process) are being ignored, in order to sustain our current trafficking system.

I’ve put thousands of hours of work into this book. Anyone who knows me, knows that I am diligent when it comes to my projects. I wouldn’t disseminate a publication unless I felt it met an acceptable standard of quality. I’m ready to share my book for dialectic.

I want to emphasize the word DIALECTIC. Take the time to understand the arguments and make them your own; then attack the arguments and see if they hold water. If there is a case to be made for the sovereign citizens, I think this book is their best chance.

The link is provided below: https://www.amazon.com/Personal-Liberty-truth-vehicle-infractions/dp/1508921334

CertifiedRabbi #fundie reddit.com

Contrary to the common talking point that eugenics is "thoroughly debunked pseudoscience", eugenics is actually one of the most important ideas in all of human history. There's nothing pseudoscientific about the idea of improving the human gene pool. Virtually all scientists, academics, intellectuals, and progressives in the late 19th and early 20th century supported eugenics for a reason: it's the logical conclusion of Darwinian evolution.

We all recognize the importance of keeping the gene pools strong and healthy in other species, but we make an exception for our own species because we think that we're somehow immune from the accumulative effects of dysgenics. Reality check: we're not.
After the Nazis tried to implement their utopian Aryan society through utilizing extremely brutal forms of eugenics, the Western world decided to not only turn their backs on eugenics, but we went in the exact opposite direction by actually celebrating dysgenics.
The left encourages mass 3rd world immigration and miscegenation and embraces various forms of Marxism and egalitarianism, and the right demonizes birth control and abortion and embraces Christian universalism. Adopting 3rd world kids and dating outside of your race has almost become a fashion statement on both the left and the right. And the right has become even more dysgenic by viewing handicapped babies as a blessing from God. At least the left still has enough common sense to abort their handicapped fetuses. That's why down syndrome is almost completely non-existent in Iceland now.

Now, I'm not saying that we should become like the ancient Greeks and practice infanticide by tossing our handicapped babies off of a cliff, or like the early 20th century American progressives by forcibly sterilizing the feeble minded, or like the Nazis by gassing the mentally ill and other undesirables. But we need to start rethinking our opposition to eugenics now that we have enough scientific understanding and technical know-how to implement the utopian promises of eugenics without violating anyone's basic human rights.

We can all agree that countries like Switzerland and Japan greatly benefit from having an average IQ score that's about 30 points higher than the average IQ score in Nigeria and Kenya, right? Well, imagine if we could create a society that had an average IQ score of 130, 150, 180, or even 200. And imagine if we could locate the genes and alleles that make people extremely conscientious. And imagine if we could locate the genes and alleles that allow people to live long, healthy lives and break world records in sports. And imagine if we could humanely remove the genes and alleles that make people prone to criminality. We'd be able to create the most advanced civilization that ever existed within just 3 or 4 generations. And every generation would be a significant improvement over the last generation.

And we could accomplish this utopian vision without forcibly sterilizing or killing anyone. All we'd have to do is subsidize contraception and early-term abortion and make genome sequencing, embryo selection, and precision gene editing mandatory by law. Crime would disappear; productivity, GDP, and technological advancement would sky rocket; political corruption and bad governance in general would be a thing of the past; health care costs would plummet; everyone would look like supermodels; et cetera.
And leftists should support this utopian sci-fi vision as well because we'd finally be able to solve inequality and transcend the primitive tribalism that has defined our species for millennium. We'd also finally be able to fix the underlying genetic shortcomings which have held back the lower classes and brown people over the last several decades. And we'd actually be greatly diminishing human suffering by curing genetic diseases.

Eugenics is also the most logical and effective solution to climate change and a long list of other serious environmental problems. I'm a former far-left environmental extremist, so I'm very aware of the fact that human overpopulation is almost always the root cause of most environmental challenges. I'm also very aware of the fact that exponential human population growth is a looming crisis that barely anyone has the balls to talk about because they don't want to be viewed as creepy misanthropes and Bond villains. But the fact remains that our planet's dwindling natural resources simply can't sustain a population of 10+ billion people, especially if standards of living and consumption levels in the 3rd world continue to rise. So, if we have to dramatically reduce the human population, then selecting for the best and brightest simply makes sense.

CertifiedRabbi #racist reddit.com

The manopshere wing of the Alt-Right was always my least favorite wing of the Alt-Right because it just reeks of male insecurity and degenerate black male mating strategies. And this latest controversy where they tried to chase away our female supporters just cemented my disdain for them.

This latest controversy is also yet another reminder that I can never tell the difference between hardcore ideologues, retards, crazy people, and enemy infiltrators/government informants. I mean, who in their right mind would try to chase our female supporters like Tara away? And going after Lauren for being a race-mixer in high school when you yourself are a race-mixer strikes me as being extremely suspect.

It almost seems like our recent forced "engagement" with the Arab and Islamic world after the 9/11/2001 Islamic terrorist attacks has started to rub off on our culture. Roosh himself is Middle Eastern. And a lot of Alt-Right guys that were military veterans probably got sent into Iraq and Afghanistan, and now they're trying to bring that type of old school patriarchy back to the West because they think that it will solve the liberal pussification of our society. But to me that's just crazy because we're not in a position to dictate the social norms of the average White person. Maybe if we actually achieved power that type of desire to turn White women back into 1950's era housewives would make sense. But trying to push that type of shit now when we only have influence over maybe 1% of the White female population? What in the fuck are these manosphere morons thinking?

I always thought that Ramzpaul was talking out of his ass when he accused Anglin and crew of being paid shills, but I'm increasingly starting to think that as well. Anyone with a serious criminal record is very suspect in my view because that makes them vulnerable to being coerced into becoming government informants in order to avoid lengthy jail sentences. And you have to be fucking insane to think that you can actually normalize neo-Nazism in the modern Western world. Regardless of their motivations, the end result of their efforts is the same: yet another failed White Nationalist movement that goes nowhere because the average White person will never embrace neo-Nazism or blatant bigotry. And ensuring that no White women will join our movement will only speed up our demise.

The Alt-Right's openness and unwillingness to purge anyone that's pro-White regardless of how crazy their other beliefs are is biting us in the ass by allowing the autists to define the movement. And it's making us vulnerable to hostile infiltration and manipulation.

CertifiedRabbi #racist reddit.com

"How do you handle interactions with non-white family and friends?"

Smiling on the outside, plotting against them on the inside...

-Have a non-white friend?

I had friends from pretty much every racial background when I was a kid and when I was still a liberal (I left the Left when I was a sophomore in college after my White best friend was murdered by illegal immigrants), but now I can't stand non-Whites and non-Asians to be honest. I just don't have any respect for brown and black people. Their societies are garbage for a reason: they have garbage genetics. Most of my friends are White now, but I still have a few East Asian and hapa friends and one Indian friend (the South Asian variety).

-Have non-white family (even by marriage)?

I have an East Asian sister-in-law (unfortunately). My older brother married a girl from Hong Kong that he met at UC Berkeley. I pretend to like her and my hapa niece and nephew, but I'm secretly depressed that my older brother decided to marry a non-White woman.

-Be saddened if a friend or family member was deported according to Alt-Right intentions?

I honestly wouldn't care. Deportation isn't murder. They'll still be alive. You can always make new friends.

-Disown or otherwise shun a family member who associates with non-whites?

Depends on the situation. I wouldn't really care if my siblings had a handful of non-White friends like I did. But if they became trashy wiggers or something and started dating and hanging out with ghetto black people, then I'd probably cut them out of my life completely. They bring shame on whole famiry.

-Accept a non-white boss at work?

I honestly wouldn't like that, but I guess that I could tolerate it since I have to pay the bills like everybody else.

-Hire a non-white employee?

I just got promoted and I'm now involved in the hiring process. I try to hire my fellow White brothers and sisters as much as possible, but I won't screw over a non-White person if their resume is way more impressive.

-Move if your neighborhood became less white than it once was?

Definitely.

EDIT: Forgot one. How do your family and friends feel about your beliefs?

I pretend to be a liberal in real life in order to make my life easier, so they have absolutely no idea that I'm a closeted Alt-Right White Nationalist.

mangosplumsgrapes #sexist reddit.com

Damn, I realize that this is so much longer than I intended it to be. Sorry! So I used to be someone in support of trans people, I actually found it inspiring that trans people were willing to flout convention and be whoever they wanted to be despite what society says they should be. To me it represented the dawn of a future of acceptance and freedom. I fully bought into the idea that they are trapped in the wrong body and that they are the gender that they believe they are. The very first thing that popped that naive bubble was when I realized that the only trans people that you see in the media, the only ones who are getting support and respect, are trans women.

I thought to myself, why, since men are the ones with power in society, is it not trans men who are visible, leading the movement? I asked this question on another internet forum, and someone answered simply, the reason trans women are getting respect is because they are actually men, and the reason trans men are virtually invisible is because they are actually women. At that moment I had the uncomfortable realization that despite having transitioned, trans people are still afforded the amount of privilege and respect, or lack thereof, that the sex they were born with accrues. That was the first small puncturing of the rosy bubble.

Then I became friends with a guy who had previously identified as trans. He was no longer trans when I met him, but there was still so much cognitive dissonance going on. The following is going to be a rant about him that I need to get off my chest. He told me when we met that he was in depression in his teens and 20s because he wanted to be a girl and that he almost transitioned in his mid 20s, but didn’t go through with it because he realized that he wouldn’t pass as female transitioning this late in life. At first, I found the story interesting and felt bad that he had felt trapped in the wrong body for so long and had hated himself.

But— then I realized that a lot of things didn’t add up. I had always thought that most TIM are trans because they have typically feminine interests, feminine mannerisms, are often gay etc—. but he had none of this whatsoever. He is masculine, there is NOTHING feminine about him. Had he actually transitioned he would have been the butchest woman alive. I asked him about this and he said, “well, I thought I’d just be a tomboy girl.” His interests, way of moving and speaking, way of communicating and relating to the world, to women, EVERYTHING about him was stereotypically nerdy heterosexual male. He told me that he didn’t start to desire to be a girl till he was 11 or 12.

I also found it odd that he watches almost exclusively typical straight male sci-fi and superhero movies. For example he loved the creepy male fantasy film Passengers. If he actually feels like a woman, shouldn’t he be identifying with the female characters in movies, not the male characters? If so, why does he only watch movies that are from male perspectives, where the women aren’t fully fleshed out and are viewed as romantic/sex objects? Despite being a typical guy, he viewed himself as feminine. He would ask me, am I feminine, is my face feminine? When I would tell him, no, there’s nothing feminine about you, you are masculine. No, you’re face isn’t feminine, he’d become offended.

I went to a ladies night at a club with him, and I realized that it was inappropriate for him to be there and I told him this. His response was, “you don’t get it, I don’t feel like a man, and maybe there are some bisexual women at the club” I said very firmly to him, that it doesn’t matter how HE feels, he IS a man, and therefore it’s not appropriate for him to be there and even if there are bisexual women there, they didn’t go to a ladies night to meet men. I tried to explain to him that sometimes women just want to be with other women and away from men. He protested that it was unfair to exclude him and that he didn’t believe in gender anyway. Then the whole controversy over the female-only screenings of Wonder Woman came up. I chatted with him about it and he said, “when you’re othered by a group, you suddenly feel very disconnected and isolated from them.” This just astounded me that he is protesting about being othered by a group that he IS other to! You’re not a woman!

When I met him, I thought that the fact that he had considered himself a woman for so long would make him more sensitive and understanding of women, I was wrong. His so-called feeling like he’s a woman had NOTHING to do with identifying with actual women. If it did, he would watch movies with female protagonists, he’d have female friends etc. He would have felt himself a girl pre-puberty. Instead his desire to be a woman came from sexual fantasies, he told me how he would watch porn and imagine himself as the woman.

His insistence that female-only places are discriminatory comes from a complete lack of understanding of what it’s like to be a woman in the world. It is not discriminatory for women to want spaces where we can actually feel free, because like it or not, we are always restricted when around men because they are stronger and more aggressive than women, and are often looking for sex from women. Even a town with only females, or a business that hired only women, would not be discriminatory, because women are placed at that much of a disadvantage to men, just because of our biology. He didn’t understand any of this.

His insistence to be included in something he doesn’t belong in shows a lack of respect for women and our experiences. His belief that he’s feminine comes from a denial of actual women, who are the ones who are actually feminine. There are some men who are feminine, but he was not one of them. If he had knowledge of the way women relate to others, move around the world, engage in conversation, he would realize he isn’t feminine, but I guess he had never observed women closely enough to realize he isn’t like the majority of them. His trans-ness didn’t come from feeling like a woman in any way. That was all bullshit. It came from his own narcissistic desire, with a total lack of acknowledgement of actual women and that we are in fact different from him.

This made me realize how dangerous denying gender/sex is. Gender/sex affects all of us. With small exceptions, there are two kinds of humans, and the experience of being the two kinds are very different. His denial of this is childish and self-serving. He was a pretty cool guy in many ways, but this was a wedge that couldn’t be surmounted. This friendship made me realize that a denial of gender also means a denial of feminist issues. At the women’s march, there was a group of girls holding up a sign saying, “men are afraid that women will laugh at them, women are afraid that men will kill them”. I pointed to the sign and said it was true. He became offended. I told him I wasn’t talking about him at all, but that it IS a reality of being a woman. He just wouldn’t have it, he thought I was trying to make him feel bad about being male by pointing out that sign. I wasn’t trying to make him feel bad, I was just pointing out a sign that was true, should I have held back because he’s a guy and his feelings might get hurt? How are we supposed to have a conversation as a society about rape, sexual harassment, and violence, when men whine that their feelings are hurt when you point out that men do the majority of these things?

Since then I have also come to realize that a lot of people who transition do so because they don’t feel accepted as a gay person. For example, the singer Charice who has transitioned to being a man. When she first transitioned, I felt happy for her, because I thought she was finally getting to be her true self. Then someone pointed out the amount of abuse she got when she came out as a butch lesbian, and that transitioning to male was probably her attempt to escape that abuse. I am not inside Charice’s head, so I can’t say with certainty what is motivating her, but I think that person was probably right and that makes me very sad. So all of this combined with recent attempts to erase the word woman to say “person’s with uteruses” and the push to get anyone who identifies as trans on female sports teams etc etc, has made me realize this trans/ a-gender movement is erasing women, erasing us a category, erasing the protections we have, erasing gay people. I have realized that it is not a progressive movement at all, but another form of males getting to do whatever the hell they want at the expense of women.

Edessasail #racist reddit.com

Europeans only for citizenship. I'd accept a non-white non-citizen resident minority population, but absolutely NEVER exceeding 10-20 percent of the population, and the larger it grew the harsher immigration restrictions would get for non-white countries, and the more privileges they would lose as a group.

GeraldoSemPavor #racist reddit.com

This idea you have that people who think like us are triggered and frothing at the mouth because some guy has an Asian buddy or dates a Polynesian chick is a movie nazi strawman.
We just want historically white countries to not make policies that specifically hurt the interest of whites.

Do you ask an Israeli if he's not Israeli anymore because he has an Arab friend? Do Israelis with Chinese friends make Israel not a Jewish state?

If Israel is <50% Jewish it won't be a Jewish state anymore. Likewise, if UK or America is <50% white it will be like Brasil at best or Venezuela at worst.

As a Brasilian I can assure you, it's better for whites to have demographics like Germany or America than it is to have demographics like Brasil.
None of this means we think its immoral or anger inducing to have a foreign friend.

If I could ask you a question out of curiosity, at what % population does a racial group have to be before they can specifically advocate for their ethnic interests such as Blacks and Asians do in the UK?

Falic Integralism #fundie reddit.com

The main reason for the decline of white America, is the growth of Jewry, (social / humanitarian)-liberalism and its multi-racial in that sense egalitarian propaganda plus education for ages now – especially after the 20th century and this all escalated after the 40’s / WW2. Females voting is a byproduct of that, which since females are more emotional and lack a visual intelligence to grasp reality on high profound level - hasn’t been a good thing overall. The main issue is not females voting though. It has been the multi-racial transformation, the mass-colored immigration and its propaganda plus ideologies which have become mainstream.

White females for ages were against miscegenation largely. Blaming women for the current situation is wrong with some sprinkles of truth.

IMULTRAHARDCORE #racist reddit.com

I think maybe you underestimate Jewish greed and also the human desire for revenge. Historically Jews were not treated very well in White nations. Convincing Islam to invade the West and cause war which could possibly end in the destruction of one or both is in alignment with Jewish interests.

various posters #fundie reddit.com

(Note: They don't seem much racist, mostly criticizing Multiculturalism as an idea, so I think FSTDT fits more than RSTDT.)

(god-fist)

Multiculturalism will ruin Asia

There are so many disadvantages. All the so called successful multikulti societies would be better off being homogeneous. Any Asian who lives in these societies will admit it. There's no obligation for Asians to take in other races. Ironic that the country promoting open borders and diversity for others is the most nationalistic and conservative.

Excuse to reduce the number of Asians and weaken our countries

Increased crime rates

Gender imbalance since majority of migrants will be male

Millions of xmaf will form and making angry hapas

Asian civilization is built by amaf

Higher taxes since we will be giving them welfare, housing, food stamps

Overpopulation

(HenLiHai)
Multiculturalism is degeneracy. Asia for Asians. We don't need to be dragged down by others and their regressive values

(TheRedDragon88)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GOqLaCXOeo4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0hD7IffTJs

this is the last thing we need theres already so much foreign rapists and pedos

(The_legalist)
How about multi culturalism amongst Asians ? Most migrants to Asian countries are Asians themselves. Like vietnamese working in Taiwan or Indonesians in Korea etc. The general trend is for men from richer Asian countries to marry women from poorer countries, so i think migration definitely benefits Asian man.

(HenLiHai)
That's fine as long as assimilation occurs. And in this case, it is possible because Asians are all the same race, therefore, assimilation can be achieved within one or two generations. Even foreign Asian children that grow up in a different Asian country likely can pass for a local Asian.

(god-fist)
Thats up to the country themsleves if they want asian mixing or pure nationality.

(MysticalOcean)
Minority culture will eventually be absorbed to majority culture.

(sexpatdownvotes)
Wrong. Have we been absorbed into white culture despite how much we coon our ass for them? Have blacks been absorbed into white culture? Muslims? Hispanics?

Dashashound #racist reddit.com

There is a huge problem in the US and it's niggers, 80% of all violent crime is committed by them, they are infecting the white dna, and they throw garage into the streets,they need to go.

Certified Rabbi #fundie reddit.com

This is probably one of the darkest aspects of my worldview that I don't like to talk about. Our society has become way, way too dysgenic. It's even become trendy on the Right to adopt babies with autism and down syndrome in order to boost your anti-abortion, anti-Nazi street cred... It all started around the same time that Sarah Palin decided to give birth to her child even though she knew that it had down syndrome. Giving birth to a handicapped baby or adopting a handicapped baby is like the Right's version of adopting African babies.
Parents have an irrational attachment to their severely handicapped children. I won't link any pictures because it's so disturbing, but parents are actually choosing to give birth to babies with harlequin-type ichthyosis even though it's an absolutely horrific birth defect where the infant will suffer horribly before they die - and all because abortion = murder/eugenics/Nazism. These babies literally look like they were born inside out...
The state absolutely has to intervene in the cases of severe birth defects, especially if the birth defects are genetically caused, because most modern parents simply will not give up on their kids no matter how screwed up they are.
One of my ex-girlfriends in college was studying to become a special needs teacher, and her and I would do volunteer work at a center for kids with severe mental and physical disabilities. I was always polite and friendly on the outside when we went there, but on the inside seeing so much suffering was tearing me apart emotionally. These severely handicapped kids were literally vegetables that were going to be stuck in their wheelchairs and looked after like infants for their entire lives. Not only were they physically handicapped, but they were mentally handicapped as well. They had absolutely no idea what was going on around them, they couldn't feed themselves, they were drooling constantly, they had to wear diapers, et cetera. It fucking tears me up just thinking about how many centers like this exist across the world.
Taking care of these types of people probably destroys entire families simply because they require so much effort and attention to look after. And they also cost an absolute fortune to care for. My friend's brother has severe epilepsy and autism, and he told me that his generic anti-seizure medication costed several thousand dollars per month... And something ridiculous like 60 million Americans are on disability. And anyone that understands the forbidden science of dysgenics knows that this problem is just going to get worse and worse every year.
The state needs to start stepping in, doing the necessary evil, and then the parents can simply try again.
I also support humane versions of eugenics - such as genome sequencing, embryo selection, precision gene editing, and early term abortion - in order to solve 99% of this problem.

JCCheapEntertainment #fundie reddit.com

If I were black, I wouldn't want non-black immigration to Africa. If I were white, I wouldn't want non-white immigration to Europe. I don't hate these other races or groups, but simply love my own, which are East Asians. Rather I'm a proponent of universal nationalism, in where each distinct group of people not only have the right, but must exercise that right for self-determination, all the while respecting that same basic right granted to other groups; maximizing cooperation when mutually beneficial, but never exploit or oppress other groups, which is a moral constraint that should and must be incorporated.

SigmaMu #racist reddit.com

Jews have the privilege of being able to form ethnically homogeneous enclaves, and are on average wealthier than white europeans. Thus Jews are insulated from the effects of muslim invasion. When a muslim commits a truck of peace attack, he would have to kill fifty goyim to a chance of killing a jew, statistically. Besides, robbing Europeans of sovereign homelands has a knock-on effect that benefits every jew world wide, that far outweighs the interests of any individual jew inside those countries.

throwawaymeboy #racist reddit.com

I honestly don't know for sure. My best answer is Kevin McDonald's, which is that Jews have an extreme response to danger and hatred from millennia of persecution, and simply perceive a greater potential threat from awakened whites than from disorganized and low-IQ Muslims.

The reason I dislike and suspect most Jews isn't because I "know" some uber-specific conspiracy. It's because I have observed, through research of our political institutions, higher education, the media and finance, that Jews have an extreme overrepresentation in all of these fields and in the general running of our nation. They are incredibly likely to support social liberalism AND Israeli expansionism, and form/lead groups that promote this.

Imultahardcore #fundie reddit.com

"You do understand that you have no options, outside of eliminating immigration, right?"

Even a "forever" ban on new immigration is no guarantee of fixing the situation with the demography and birth rates being what they are. It would be a band aid on a gun shot wound.

1) This option has been examined and dismissed by most in the Alt Right. Interestingly Germany is now offering to pay Muslim Migrants to return where they came from so we'll actually get to see how successful such a venture would be without trying it ourselves in the United States.

2) As you said ethnic cleansing via forcibly removing people and/or killing them is costly and bad optics. However this is always the fallback option. It has to be. We have a right to defend our homeland and that includes with deadly force if necessary. We don't want it to come to this though obviously.

3) This is Jared Taylor's preferred solution. He seems to have given up on ever taking back an actual white nation in North America and instead just wants whites to live peacefully by themselves if they choose to do so. It's a nice thought but it will never be allowed to happen. When whites out perform non whites they cry racism and discrimination and demand the benefits of white work be it in the form of welfare or housing opportunities. They want to live in low crime neighborhoods (formed by whites) but then they shit it up once they get in. There is no escaping "diversity" if you're white. This is not an option.
And that’s not even counting that no liberal and most conservatives are not going for the first two options for moral reasons. Even if people became „woke“ and you would make 1 or 2 work, it would still divide people more than you would unite them.

In case you haven't noticed both liberals and conservatives are becoming increasingly irrelevant.

"And lastly – 35% of legal US population is not white and the number is going to increase, even if you can get rid of immigration. So ultimately, US won’t become white nation ever again."

I'm sure they said Spain would never be Christian again right before the Reconquista. They, whoever they are, probably think Constantinople will never be retaken. They were wrong then, they are wrong about the United States now, and we will prove them wrong again on the shores of the Black Sea before they can even figure out what happened. Deus Vult!

An0nym0us1dea #fundie reddit.com

Religion is designed to focus the people’s attention and energy on a single, unchanging, uncompromising and invisible supreme being who allegedly created an inferior human race just for some extra companionship and love for himself and then supposedly foisted a set of oppressive and in some cases arbitrary rules on them, which if broken would be met with unimaginable punishment.

This keeps the followers in a continuing state of fear and compliance. They are afraid to question the intentions of this invisible being and they are afraid of even expressing their own individuality in many cases. Christians and others are taught that they have virtually no power to do anything except pray, worship and do good deeds.

They are taught to practice self denial and are told that their own will is totally irrelevant. Religious followers believe that they are yielding their will over to a benevolent cosmic individual who has single-handedly created the whole universe and has their best interests at heart when in fact they are handing over their will and freedoms to hidden groups of religious elites for the elites own personal gains.

It appears that religion must constantly degrade and humiliate its followers in order to glorify and elevate its god. Unfortunately many people appear eager to give away their power to authority and seem to have a need and even a desire to be ruled and disciplined by it.

Worshipping gods is futile and is nothing more than an ancient primitive custom practiced by weak minded and superstitious people. It has no place in the 21st century. The reason we have life in this world is to experience life in this world, not to spend our entire lives studying an old book, looking up to the sky and worshipping an invisible ruler in another realm.

The main method by which Christians in particular are trapped and deceived is with the messiah or saviour story. This is linked to the ‘original sin’ story which is designed to impose a large amount of guilt onto the whole of humanity. The believers are then so grateful that they have been saved by the son of God nearly 2000 years before they were born that in some cases they abandon all reason, logic and good judgment to obey and worship this god and his son.

Anyone who believes this story is indeed lost because to believe that a god would send his only son to help us, only to see his son get tortured and murdered, and then instead of unleashing all his wrath, simply absolve us from all crimes past and present, is pure madness to say the least.

Where is the lesson for us in that? What has been achieved? There is no lesson or purpose because it’s all about mass psychological enslavement and disempowerment. The so called god that we are expected to worship is undoubtedly just a dictator strawman concocted by the religious elites for the purpose of controlling the masses.

If there is a prime creator in this universe then it is unlikely that he would interfere and impose on us by foisting his arbitrary laws, let alone need and demand our frivolous worship and blind obedience. Neither of those things requires any level of mental aptitude or creativity. The intelligence and skills that’s been given to many has gone totally to waste. Many have lowered themselves to the pointless practice of hero worship.

Furthermore, Christianity, Islam and a few other religions are polarized religions. They are polarized against each other. One is believed to be good and the other is seen as bad. The funny thing is, is that each one thinks that their’s is good and the other’s is bad. In most ways they’re both bad. The only good kind of religion is a neutral and all loving one. Polarized religions have been devised by influential elite leaders to play the people off against each other.

That way the elite can defeat and enslave the population practically without lifting a finger. Religion is like a drug to some. And they need a 2000 year old hero to save them - from themselves that is! The churches don’t permit their followers to have any real truth and knowledge because that would empower the people too much so they spoon feed them kiddie stories, half truths, distortions and even lies and the followers value it highly even though they must spend the rest of their lives just making sense of it.

The irony is that religion is pretty much man made, so mankind has really brought this onto themselves. The religious elites are not totally to blame because many people actually enjoy listening to mystical sounding stories, performing rituals, customs and traditions, playing polarity roles and dramas and waging battles against what they perceive to be a devil boogie man. They also have a secret fetish to be dominated and ruled with an iron fist by a supreme ruler or king. After all these centuries people still haven’t learned to take back their power and start taking responsibility for themselves .

Falicintegralism #fundie reddit.com

My experience with colored people have predominately been good. Friendship while growing up and some flings with girls as well during the years.
However that is completely irrelevant to the racial reality and as such the reality that they as a group of people overall tend to be more prone to criminality and violence. Also there is the reality that they as a group overall have a strong dysgenic impact on Europeans and that Europeans, specifically homogeneous Europeans who are predominately Meds, Dinards - Falics and Nordics - are the pillar of humanity - this includes male creativity (mostly creating the modern technical world overall due to a very gifted spatial ability in our males), culture, sentient wise, aesthetically human beauty wise, artistically and morally overall. Their growing existence in our countries weakens and directly threatens the better races white civilizations. Numerous great white civilizations have already fallen due to invasions, immigration and substantial race-mixing with non-whites. The Nordic ideal should have won after WW2 and with it a more racial - monolithic Europe plus whites worldwide on the whole.

zechoriah #fundie reddit.com

[Comment under "Hi, my name is Beth Reinhard. I work for the Washington Post, and I was outed for trying to pay a women $1000 to accuse Roy Moore of sexual assault"]

Hang that bitch right next to the Wall Street bull

charlygorpe #fundie reddit.com

I had this thought today..I can see it getting to a point in the future where animal agricultures profits get affected that much by people turning their back to factory farming that some new wave of "vegan terrorists" will magically appear out of nowhere attacking slaughterhouses etccc (all secretly funded by them of course) and in turn vegans will be portrayed as public enemy number one, currently how it is with Muslim extremists at the moment..

netzachwoman #sexist reddit.com

I lost all my friends when I voiced my gender critical views. Literally all of my friends dumped me and no longer speak to me because I'm just a stupid terf in their eyes. You are not alone.
I also lost one of my oldest friends because she was trans, FTM, I merely told her I'm a radical feminist and then she told me we could no longer be friends.

Twelve years of friendship negated at the drop of a hat. They really are a dangerous cult. I'm sorry your friend has been indoctrinated, but I'm afraid there's little to nothing you can do to change this. Take it from me, an experienced terf, he's already found his people and drank the Kool-Aid. It's too late. They can't agree to disagree, they won't hear out our opinions, and they wish death upon us. It's a lost cause.

I think it is having to do with autism. They can't comprehend someone not following societal "rules." They can't deal with masculine women or feminine men, because they don't fit any sort of societally acceptable roles. They also need to dictate all the changes in their bodies with cameras. I'm sorry for your loss.

ImmaNotDrnk #sexist reddit.com

Hardly. If anything, transgenderism has shown us that it demands complete disregard of women's plight.

The term "cis", even the notion that gender change is not influenced by current social and political factors, which transactivists would have us believe, needs an assumption of complete gender equality, the notion that sex roles aren't oppressive and prescriptive, and that the difference in male and female personalities is just as great, if not bigger, than a physiological one, in order to justify gender change as not being just a medical malpractice towards body dysphoria.

Guilt tripping/forcing women to be organ harvest material for men's whims and kinks is not going to help it either.

2ndWaveNostalgia #sexist reddit.com

I disagree, and I've read this from other commenters. It strikes me as an inaccurate comparison. It may not feel polite or nice when women on this sub criticize a TIMs appearance when dressed as a woman but it is NOT the same as the ad feminam attacks on women by MRAs or transactivists or transallies. When women here remark on the appearance of men masquerading as women in my opinion it is a reaction to two things. First the lie that people can become the opposite sex, a lie that does irreversible damage to people who are deluded by it, and second that no matter how ludicrously men dress they are entitled not only to unquestioning acceptance as women but also their arguments accorded unquestioned seriousness and weight.

In the photo of Liam "Lily" Maynard, he - an adult teenage male - is dressed like a 12 year old girl. No one I read made any comments attacking him personally. No one said he was an ugly man who became a TIM because he couldn't get laid. The commenters said he looked like a dude, and he does, and that comment is directly responsive to his claim that he is a woman. The commenters criticizing his outfit are reacting to the clear visual assertion that as a TIM he can dress in ways that emphasize his maleness and his TIM-ness and still be accorded seriousness, in a way that no woman would be. If I, as a late middle-aged woman with severe age dysphoria, claimed to be a teenager and dressed as a teenager and expected unquestioning acceptance and respect for my argument, I am confident that those people calling bullshit would comment on my appearance and I think would be right to do so.

We now have a TIM (or alleged TIM- maybe just a woman-hater taking advantage of the current pro-trans ideology social climate) who is a long-haired man wearing an "I punch Terfs" t-shirt. Would it be unladylike or impolite of us to comment on his appearance? I think a man who wants to be actually listened to when he makes the bullshit declaration that he is a woman deserves to be received with incredulity and scorn. If he chooses also to wear "woman-face" he is doubling down, and that is an additional blatant insult to women that says "I can dress like a clown and make ludicrous statements and I will be treated with respect while you can make well-founded objective statements and you will be personally attacked. I have the power, I know it, and I will rub it in your face AND in the faces of the lily-livered politicians and trans-allies."

Miranda Yardley does not "pass" yet I have never seen his appearance criticized here. He is accorded respect, affection, and gratitude for living how he wants honestly, not pretending to be a woman and trampling on the dignity and rights of women. Lastly, I've seen TIMs who dress in a way to fit in with women of their age group and I haven't seen them criticized for their appearance here, whether or not I felt they "passed". And, as people age women and men do begin to resemble each other - I haven't seen anyone here snipe at older TIMs who look like Tambor's Transparent character.

Women here have criticized the porn-actress makeup look some TIMs affect. So what? In my daily travels the only women I see wearing that kind of makeup are teenage girls and women going to clubs, so I think criticizing where these men are getting their ideals of womanhood is legit. So no, I don't think people here are creating/engaging in the same culture as MRAs and transactivists who bash women are engaged in.

{deleted account} #fundie reddit.com

(This fundie is talking about the ALF, a terrorist animal right's group that burns down homes and threatens researchers)

I wouldn't say they are the "ultimate vegans", but they are heroes and the only reason people call them terrorists is because these freedom fighters are actually doing something to save innocent lives.

CertifiedRabbi #fundie reddit.com

I don't appreciate your subtle attempt to make the Alt-Right synonymous with neo-Nazism. Neo-Nazis make the argument that non-Whites served in the German war effort during WWII. The Alt-Right rarely ever talks about that topic.
As to the talking point that we do actually make quite often about our support for nationalism for all people; well, for starters we do actually support that. But contrary to your claim, we aren't really trying to appeal to non-Whites when we make that argument. Who we're really appealing to with that argument is blue-pilled White people who we're trying to gradually red-pill.
But as to your overall point that it's bizarre for us to appeal to non-Whites; I pretty much agree. I've never understood why so many White Nationalists throughout history have tried to form alliances with black nationalists and the like. It never went anywhere or accomplished anything of note - besides maybe the creation of Liberia.
Whites are a very self-reliant, highly organized, and competent race. We've never needed the aid of outsiders in order to create highly successful nations and empires all across this planet, or ideological movements for that matter. That's why attempts to create alliances with non-Whites strikes me as being inherently alien to our people. We dominated other races and dictated their actions whether they liked it or not.
And while I'm not exactly advocating that we go back to that era of world domination and militant White Supremacy, I do think that our efforts to uncuck our race and stand up for ourselves again should be an entirely self-contained movement. Why should non-Whites have a say in whether or not Whites should comprise a majority of the population in White countries? It's not their decision. Just like it's not the decision of non-Asians to decide if China or Japan should remain majority Asian.
And the entire idea that a large number of non-Whites would want to work with us in achieving these goals strikes me as being completely delusional. Non-Whites can smell the weakness in modern Whites from a mile away. They know that we've been turned into a bunch of pathologically self-loathing cucks by liberal ideology. They're perfectly happy with the rainbow coalition keeping a boot on our necks as they flood into our countries and leech off of our success. They like the idea of Whites becoming minorities in their own countries and gradually getting blended out of existence. That's because they're still butthurt over the colonial era.
And why would non-Whites risk getting dominated by a self-confident White race again by giving us a helping hand when what they really want to do is take advantage of this window of White weakness and grind our head into the mud even deeper so that we can never recover?
This is our struggle and our responsibility. We can't look to non-Whites to save us from ourselves.

CertifiedRabbi #fundie reddit.com

I've been red-pilled about IQ since I was 14 and I just turned 30. So I've been following this particular topic for about 16 years now. I've also been an IQ evangelist for about 9 years now. I was the anonymous asshole in the comment section talking about racial differences in IQ scores.
I've been banned from hundreds of websites, forums, and subreddits for writing about this ugly aspect of science. I felt like a crazy person that was shouting complete nonsense into the wind because almost everyone would automatically dismiss my views. I also felt like I was getting absolutely nowhere and was completely wasting my time and energy on trying to normalize a scientific finding that the masses would never accept.
I was also keenly aware of the tiny number of brave scientists and academics from previous generations who had spent their entire lives trying to normalize the idea that some races were inherently more intelligent than others and had paid the price for committing that heresy by being socially ostracized. It was even more discouraging when you realized that these men were giants in their fields (Eysenck is the most cited psychologist in history), and yet almost nobody would listen to them. They had essentially wasted and ruined their lives because they dared to acknowledge what the data was telling us about racial differences in intelligence. So, if they couldn't get anywhere, then what chance do I have?
Yet, like a true religious zealot, I kept spreading the race realism Gospel wherever I could. That's the power of knowing that you're right and knowing that you've uncovered the key to understanding human inequality. You just can't help trying to spread ideas that you know in your bones are correct and extremely important.
After years of depressing online activism, I finally started to notice an uptick in people talking about this issue over the last fews years. I started to see a very small but growing number of people acknowledging racial IQ differences in the comment sections of right-wing blogs. And, like you said, in the last couple of years I've noticed a huge increase in people talking about this issue. It's rare now to read a news article or social media post about race where someone doesn't bring up racial IQ differences in the comment section.
After we red-pilled Sam Harris on this issue, I knew that we were on the verge of entering the mainstream and that our eventual victory was inevitable. After all, he's a modern liberal icon and a Jew. If anyone should be biased on this issue, then it should be him. That we won him over is proof that the data really is on our side and that the common argument that racial IQ differences is "thoroughly debunked pseudoscience" was a dishonest talking point that was concocted in order to combat the reemergence of scientific racism.
We IQ evangelists are on the ascendance, and our momentum is on the verge of receiving a massive boost now that the cost of human genome sequencing has plummeted. We've already discovered some of the genes and alleles that are linked to intelligence. And we've already discovered that these genes and alleles aren't evenly distributed across racial groups and largely mirror the racial IQ differences that we've known for decades.
The case for racial differences in intelligence being quite real and largely genetically caused is only going to get stronger and stronger as we discover more and more of these genes and alleles. 10 years from now, anyone that denies racial differences in intelligence will be viewed in much the same way that young Earth creationists are viewed now: willfully ignorant and delusional ideologues that are rejecting science because it debunks their mostly deeply held beliefs.
Who knows how the left and the world in general will react to this paradigm shift. Will the masses become race realists and more open to the rest of our ideas? Will the ranks of the pro-White movement increase dramatically now that they know that science is on their side? Or will the scientific and academic community and the media continue to ruthlessly crack down on race realists and continue to pump out egalitarian propaganda to a receptive public? Or will the left evolve by arguing that precision gene editing and embryo selection has made these racial IQ differences irrelevant? Only time will tell.
I'm not as optimistic as you are, but that's probably because I'm pessimistic by nature.

GCnewb #sexist reddit.com

This rant has been brewing a whole so I apologise for length. I've been wrestling with my beliefs and feelings on trans ideology. For the past while I've been doing a lot of mental gymnastics to try to justify what I thought was my position of "rational trans ally." I thought I was maybe some kind of "EX-TERF" because I started to buy into this idea that being critical of trans ideology was always hateful and since I loved my trans friends I had to be wrong. I tried to "re-educate" myself. I read up on lib fem sources and tried really really hard to silence the critical part of my mind.

Every time a TIM in my life acted with obvious male socialisation I tried to explain it away with "oh she's not been long transitioned and this is just my bigotry talking." I can't do it anymore. I hit peak over and over. ALL of the TIMs I had been friends with tried to muscle in on #metoo. I have no doubts that trans people are just as likely to be victims as anyone but this was different. They would step over natal women and shout about cis-centrism and cry about cis privilege when these women were discussing awful awful assaults. One actually said they wished they had a pussy that could be grabbed.

I've been watching Contrapoints videos, keeping up with their transition, sympathising with a lot of it but time and time again they would say or do something that was just so MALE that I wanted to scream. Today Contra started raising money by selling tickets to a "debate" between 3 TIMs run and hosted by literal, Holocaust-denying fascists. And Contra isn't the only fascist-supporting TIM I've encountered. They're always white and middle class and late-transitioning and obviously fetishistic MEN. I want to scream. I can't play this game any more. Men are colonising our spaces and claiming we're the oppressors. I think I've hit my final peak.

sjmoore10 #fundie reddit.com

Actively hope for it to happen to people that go out with the intention to kill. I'm from Alberta where these headlines come up a more than a few times a year of hunters getting killed and I feel good when I see it. Score one for the home team.

rinabean #fundie reddit.com

Extremism for a good cause is fine. Breaking the law is dangerous but not necessarily wrong. If the only "harm" done is to profits/property it's not real harm. I was going to say that as long as no-one is getting hurt or doing things like setting fires it's fine.

But I would absolutely punch someone on the street if it was the only way to get them to stop torturing a stray dog/cat. How does that scale up? I have no idea, honestly. But if no-one is being hurt it's definitely okay.

I think the people who risk their liberty and sometimes their lives like this are very brave. I'm not brave enough to do anything like that but I'm glad there are people out there who will do it.

Soycrates #fundie reddit.com

I think actions that do not cause physical harm to others, and do not incite a great deal of fear or terror, are ethical acts of resistance against a system of animal exploitation. Convincing others to go vegan might make the future a better place, but helping animals who are currently alive means standing directly in the way of those who wish to harm them.

Even making legal changes in favour of animal protection is a slow process and too often do some "welfare" laws encourage and protect further harm and slaughter of animals, so long as it's done what they deem the "right" and proper way to do it.

As long as people continue to harm animals, we will need to do more than simply sit idly by and say "well, I don't do that, nor do I support it".

ST616 #conspiracy reddit.com

(This fundie is talking about the Labour Party's anti-Semitism troubles.)

The main propaganda stratery of Zionism has been to slander anyone who think that Palestians are human beings and should be treated as such as antisemites. Also there are the people who don't like Corbyn because of his left wing politics and they are prepared to use literally anything to slander him and his supporters.

ohlawdwat #conspiracy reddit.com

The moment the government seriously addresses UFOs is the moment they have a bunch of people start asking really strange questions, like "so what about all those people who claim to be getting abducted by aliens?" and "what about those dead cattle", and other things that can't be answered, and a bunch of new lies that need to be told to 'maintain order', so it's better to just pretend nothing is happening and that none of it exists. How about "so what about all those people who have come out and talked about you guys having military programs associated with the subject?", "how about all those lies you guys have been telling us for so many years now?", or "so what about those ICBM shut-down incidents", or "how about the guys who say flying discs appeared during ICBM launch testing and knocked the missile out of the sky while it was all being filmed?".

Anyone in government who knows anything about it couldn't possibly acknowledge it without negative consequences personally or socially, and they react the same way Fife Symington made fun of the whole thing when he was Governor in order to try and keep people calm after the UFO(s) appeared over Phoenix, when in reality he had witnessed it himself and years later told his story to the world about having seen something that 'shook his reality', that he believed came from somewhere other than Earth. If they know, they can't acknowledge it because they don't have any comfortable answers, and with the resources that states have to mount investigations, chances are they have more information than your average man on the street, but maybe the answers they do have are too scary or have implications that are too serious to share with the general public.

that and through human history we see examples of societies and cultures falling apart when confronted with superior or further advanced cultures, they lose their own identities and their established social order crumbles or changes drastically, and the people with power and social position wouldn't want that, making this particular subject one of the biggest secrets - and one of the easiest to keep because a majority of people think they're being intelligent by not believing it. All those big government agencies really exist for the same purpose, to uphold and defend the established social order, to avert social collapse, to keep the rich folks safe from the poor folks and the poor folks safe from each other and managed 'for the good of all', UFOs are something that might negatively impact that, so it can't be acknowledged.

LaserBeamsCattleProd #conspiracy reddit.com

Does anyone consider that there may be some sort of agreement between aliens and humans? Therefor, the aliens decided it's in their best interest to keep things mum. People look at aliens as some type of God, that when revealed, will make all the problems go away. They might be some ramshackle explorers that just barely made it out this far.

blissplus #conspiracy reddit.com

I wish they were stepping in, but it seems like they aren't really able to or willing to - for some 'prime directive'-ish reason maybe. Although that is probably absurdly simplistic. Also, this assumes they are 'aliens'.

Everything would seem to add up if that were the case, though; if you were a superpower government and had zero power to communicate with or control sentient beings visiting from elsewhere, would you tell the public that? Or would you just deny it and maintain a 7-decades-long cult of ridicule and disinformation? Especially if their message invalidated a few world religions.

I find the idea that governmental or extragovernmental powers keep UFO secrecy in place to hoard 'free energy' and other advanced technologies to be pretty laughable. We've repeatedly shown ourselves to be utterly irresponsible by creating and using nuclear weapons and we still as standard policy solve our political differences by blowing each other to bits. I personally doubt that any advanced culture would make deals with a planet full of homicidal monkeys like us. JMO, of course.

Next page