new

Masculinity/strength= COPE. Darwinism applied to modern dating scene= LOW IQ

I'm sick of people trying to apply Darwinism and strength/health superiority to the modern dating scene. Even worse are incels DEFENDING feminism and women's sexual liberation with the argument that they're doing correct genetic selection and bettering the future generations or things like that.

First off, even if we assume Chad is always better genetically (he isn't necessarily, I'll elaborate on that below), western foids aren't reproducing solely with them. The most common scenario nowadays is a foid riding the Chad/good-looking men cock carousel during teens and twenties and then looking for a betabuxx (who'll statistically be an incel or normie at best, since Chad doesn't need to settle with used up old whores) while 30+.

She has a kid with that guy. A kid who was born from a 30yo+ mother and an incel/normie cuck who's most likely also far from his prime age as well.

The status quo tells women that having kids early is dumb and that they have to study and have a career first, and women follow the status quo blindly. They're very susceptible to it because women are natural conformists.

How is this bettering our genetics?

Also, the correlation between physical strength or even health and being successful with women is not that big. I have a Chadlite friend who has a poor health, he suffers from serious gastritits and other stuff like that. He still slays because of his awesome looking face while I'm a healthy incel at 29 after 500+ approaches.

Also, a facially good-looking small framed manlet mogs the shit all of me in the current sexual marketplace. If physical strength mattered, gymcelling and martial arts would be key factors to get women. They aren't, at best they help a bit if you're normie tier and above, but no amount of physical strength will redeem a truecel with sub3 face.

Is this guy a Chad slayer? He's certainly top 1% in physical strength if you count in his height, frame and martial arts ability. He would beat THE SHIT OUT of Chico or O'Pry.

Guys like this get way more pussy (and more quality pussy also) than him.

This guy would mog me even if he had lots of chronic diseases. FACE is the most important factor and FACE isn't necessarily correlated with being strong or healthy.

Masculinity and strength are COPE. Most women are even bisexuals, they'd pick a pretty girl over an ogre any day. I have above average testosterone, I'm tall and good framed and yet no woman ever want me because I have an ugly FACE.

Women are NOT supposed to be the selectors. In ancient times RAPE was the law. When Gengis Khan invaded an enemy tribe and killed all men there with his army, he surely didn't think "man, look at my canthal tilt and cheekbones, I'm also an Asian manlet, it's so over!" He just RAPED every foid and now like 20% of the whole Asia descends from him.

Women only have any power or choice today because CUCKS, which are all MALE, grant it to them. We're living an artificial, bizarre state of things, not a natural Darwinian one.

A brief synopsis of the Blackpill for the new guys

The older members will obviously notice the level of bluepilled and cuck posts from the newest members (May onwards) is much higher. It's to a point now where it's obvious some people are whitenights, some are MGTOWs, some are normies doing it for LOLs, and some are quite obviously trolls and outright cucks trying to convert people away from the blackpill.

But for new people who actually want to understand the blackpill it's critical that you know the conclusion of the blackpill: "IT'S OVER"

'It's over', means that no matter what you think, it's over. Therefore, one cannot be blackpilled and hold on to gradiose notions of male rights or male equality. If it's over, then concepts like male rights and equality are utterly illogical.

The blackpill means that your looks determine upwards of 90% (maybe I'm cucked for thinking it's that low; strict adherence to the blackpill would put it at 100%) of your success in sexual interaction with females. So, if you don't have the minimum standard of looks (not entirely sure what X/10 the cutoff is; debate still rages) then you literally get no sexual interactions. ZERO!

A vital part of a man's identity is defined by his sexual interactions with women. So, when he consistently gets ZERO sexual interactions there is a point at which something dies inside that man. He basically accepts that it's over. At this point, his looks now limit his entire being, because, not only have they precluded him from meaningful sexual relations, the lack of said relations has caused a critical retardation in his development as a man in general.

How can a man be confident when he never gets sex no matter what he has tried due to his looks? How can he be happy? How can he be optimistic about the future? How can he be positive about society? How can he have love for others when noone loves him? And as the time goes by, how can he even exist without every minute of his existence being an experience of limitless pain and despair? So you see, the lack of sex is simply the catalyst for a series of much deeper circles of hell that the incel slowly progresses through. Until slowly piece by piece his entire heart has turned black and any capacity for positive emotion has been removed.

At this point, it truly is over for that individual. So, you see it it utterly pointless to talk of the multitude of injustices that men face. The true blackpilled incel has moved way beyond the ability to care about such trivialities. His daily struggle is now simply to decide between coping or roping whilst hoping that the system totally collapses. The system that has never shown him any love, never given him a reason to feel positive. If anything, the truly blackpilled embrace the continual injustices committed against men because each injustice takes the system closer to collapse. And a total collapse is the only possible way to convert "IT'S OVER" to "IT'S NOT OVER YET".