All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
[Under "On this day in 1939, Francisco Franco physically removed the communists and anarchists from Madrid"]
A couple of days ago I read an article about two historians that have published a book with clear evidence that proves what many Spaniards like me suspected already, the Frente Popular rigged the elections with all manner of disgusting methods including death threats after demanding a recount so people from the right wouldn't be there to call them out on it. It was the right that won the elections of 1936 with a difference of 700.000 votes. The left has been twisting and lying about the truth for entire generations, smearing the right about it when they were the ones who started the war. Now we all know that Franco was a hero that stopped the coup from a horde of psychopaths and saved Spain from becoming a satellite country of the USSR, probably saving the population from suffering some sort of disaster like the Holodomor taking in consideration the important geographic position of the country.
At this point I'm extremely furious and fully convinced about my political position about this, I think Franco only did one thing wrong: he didn't kill enough vile leftist monsters, he should have killed them by the millions.
If you are red, you must end up dead.
Article: http://www.elmundo.es/cronica/2017/03/12/58c3b8bb46163f9f338b457d.html
Book: https://www.amazon.es/Fraude-violencia-elecciones-Popular-colecci%C3%B3n/dp/8467049464
Escaping Inceldom feels a lot lot applying for jobs
Every time I read the job description for an entry level position they require the equivalent of 5 years of work experience in the field plus grade A social skills.
[OP of "Would an increase in violence or aggressiveness beyond "Black Bloc" tactics bring the US closer to or farther from a revolution?" - Original quote since deleted but available here]
I can think of a few possible tactics that could either galvanize resistance to Trump and accelerate the revolutionary timeline or could crush it (I'm a millennial who believes in climate science and I believe taking the US out is a matter of literal survival/self defense for me and millions like me):
-Abductions/hostage scenarios
-Attacking US embassies, consulates, and American owned businesses around the world
-Targeted assassinations
-Proclamation of alternate governments and calling for a derecognition of Washington and any countries that kiss its ring
-Arming black and native Americans to defend themselves with guns, bombs, knives, rockets, and WMD
-Organized hacking and theft
-Organized libel/smear campaigns
-Organized bullying of the children of conservatives
-Going after their families, Trump style, to teach them a lesson. To me, killing babies who are too young to feel pain is horrible but also cathartic and might be less bad than killing an adult or a child.
At this point, my capacity for sympathy is strained - too many Americans either didn't vote, didn't rise up, or voted wrong and I have to view the US government and its institutions as a vile tumor on the face of humanity and an existential threat to my existence. But I also fear that instead of leading to a successful revolution these could hurt our recruitment goals and could be seen as evil acts. What do you think?
Developing social skills? Kek, that's the difference between Chad and incels, good looks made Chad be accepted in society and naturally developing social skills while being liked by everyone, that's why there's no "shy" "weird" good-looking guy
Fucking bluepillers.
I've grown up in a small town and dirt poor. I've been friends with people with neonazi views. Most of them just thought of Jewish people as middle eastern looking rich people and because manners and subtleties aren't popular in that community (I actually prefer that) they have no qualms making fun of them. Most of them didn't care that much about it, I wouldn't call them neonazi's. Some of them were more extreme, and a little frightening. People need to direct their rage somewhere. Also, all people are tribalistic to some extent, some more than others. I never belonged anywhere so I just sort of drift on these issues, but unfortunately I have to admit I wouldn't feel comfortable in an all black community (even as I've lived in one that was close to 50% black and I actually got along well with a lot of people, it just didn't feel all that "homely").
[Comment under "What made you begin to doubt the Holocaust?"]
If the holocaust happened, Hitler had every right. I wish our country had the balls to start throwing people in the ovens.
by early 30s, Asian women are already shengnu, ie noone back home wants them. The quality men that they were waiting for, the gaofushuai, sure as hell dont want a 30-something for a wife. As China's feminist organisation put it, 'the perfect man's out there, but why would he want you?'
Speaking for myself, a woman with a PhD is irrelevant in my estimation of her suitability for marriage; but given that most PhD females tend to be 30-something anyhow ie shengnu, i would look askance at them.
Now, not to say that 30-something AF are a lost cause; they could seek out an westernised AM who isnt as stringent on that as a FOB, or they could lower their standards (HAHA!!). In a way, dating a loser WM like the eg provided is lowering their standards. A lot.
Women don't like being called "female", I thought of some of other words that might be used.
• wimminz
• whores
• bitches
• cunts
• cum dumpsters
• baby factories
• penis caps
• penis gyms
• kitchen slaves
• female humanoid organisms
• carbon rich envaginated structures
• the annoying, dumb, inferior pieces of flesh around the vagina that don't invent or discover things
• cocksleeve
• roastie
• sperm garage
• Harpies
• The niggers of gender
• jizzum snorter
I couldn't think of anymore. Feel free to add more. I really do hate them with a burning passion.
"Why do you treat women like they're a different species?"
• They rarely upfront
• They hate direct communication/ propositions from sub 8 men.
• They don't have reasonable standards (going for their looks-match).
• They have far more turn offs than turn ons. If you miraculously hit a turn on staying on it is like riding a unicycle on a trapeze wire. You can easily fall off into the turn offs while men have far more turn ons and more forgiving of hitting a turn off.
• Their dating advice is rarely applicable to who they actually fucked.
• They have an irrational sexual disgust for sub 8 good guys but give their L(egs). O(pen). V(ery). E(asily) for Chad/badboys.
• They have sex on demand while the majority of men do not. Even hideous women complain that they only get sexual offers. When have you met even an average complain about the same problem?
If women were more sensible in their partner choices then current dating and relationships wouldn't be as fucked as they are and inceldom would be near non-existent.
Are Incels the most reviled members of society ever?
(TL:DR below if required)
Inceldom is not something those under its banner can control, any more than a breast cancer patient should be lambasted for letting herself get sick, and yet, only the former is subject to hatred and ridicule of such a kind as deemed, not only permissible, but encouraged.
Throughout history, there have been many examples of oppressed and reviled peoples, so let's take a look at a few and compare them to the plight of the incel.
Women
The normie favourite. Truly women have suffered unfairly throughout history, right? Surely they're still unequal today and in need of the mighty fist of feminism to even come close to man's privilege, right?
Currently, in first world countries, there is no group more privileged than woman: to suggest a biological difference between the sexes means you're a misogynistic pig. Criticism of any kind, if directed at a woman, is rendered not only moot, but considered to be a vitriolic attack of society's special sneauxphlakes.
There is an expectation that women deserve to be treated better than men, which is propogated by both men and women alike: men should always hold the door open for women; men are expected to pay for dinner; men are expected to be the providers for the family (if women want to work, they're encouraged, but men receive no such encouragement, it's merely expected of them); women are viewed as innocent and preferential in legal disputes (97% of alimony payments are made by men, women win exclusive custody 79% of the time, and women who make false rape claims are believed in spite of the notion that the accused should be considered innocent until proven guilty.)
How about the historical treatment of women? Traditionally, women have also been coddled by society. When men were required to hunt and kill to supply for small hunter-gatherer societies, women were spared from this and left safety away from any danger. Up until very recently, women were also spared from the horrors of war (despite Hillary's absurd claims) it has always been the duty of men to defend, en mass, the rights and safety of their women back home. Women have historically been treated well, even in great societies like ancient Greece where men recognized women's inferiority and preferred the company of other men, women were treated well and respected, many members of Greek society worshiping the female gods more than any other.
And in spite of all this; in spite of every advantage afforded to them, women still want more. Now, in front of the wall street bull, a little girl stands defiant. Why? As a symbol of strength against a non-existent wage gap. Society propogates a myth to make women feel better, and then builds upon that myth with symbols of strength to make women feel better still. Clearly, then, women are not so disadvantaged.
The blacks and the Jews
The two Oppression All-stars. There can be no denying that western countries have, historically, treated black people poorly. Colonialism and the ensuing slavery were clear and systematic breaches of the human rights of millions of people.
However, slavery is not exclusive to blacks. In fact, blacks were very often either the sellers, or the buyers of slaves. The word slave refers, originally, to the slavic people who were frequently forced into slavery in the middle ages. Slavery is not and was not exclusive to blacks, and yet, it is blacks who benefit from its having happened.
Affirmative action is hugely prevalent in America. Black students receive black-exclusive scholarships and receiving greater encouragement and support than non-black students.
Of course, racism existed beyond the abolishment of slavery, and still exists today. However, there have always been those who have stood up to racism. Most famous of all was Martin Luther King Jr who is universally praised for his work helping African-Americans, but he is not alone. Many people have dedicated their lives to helping blacks, some have even lost their lives in so doing: but no one has done this for incels. Incels, in spite of the hatred and discrimination they receive, are not beneficiaries of support or affirmative action in anyway. Imagine the response you would receive by going to /r/peopleofcolour and telling them they deserve to be hated or discriminated against. You would be banned sightwide for extreme prejudice, and yet, to do the same on /r/incels is considered amusing and fair. There are clear correlations between height or attractiveness and success, and yet society turns a blind eye to incels' plight. So while it is the case that African-Americans were the object of much discrimination, there has been a significant reversal and now much is done in their favour. Incels, however, are recipients only of hatred: no one wishes to aid their cause.
Likewise, the Jews and their oppression in Nazi Germany might be a favoured counter-argument to the assertion that incels are the most universally reviled societal group, however, this argument falls flat as well. It is of course true that the Jews were systematically despised and considered sub-human. This fact they share with incels.
However, there is a clear difference: When the Nazis considered the Jews sub-human, the world went to war to defend them. When the world considers incels to be subhuman, people just laugh at their plight and go on, encouraging their subhuman treatment. It is clear then which of the two is the more systematically despised.
Other [mental] illnesses
Inceldom, like race or sexuality, is genetic. If it can be resolved by weight loss, or lifting more, it's not inceldom: it's volcedlom. True inceldom is incurable and predetermined.
However, inceldom is not treated the same way as other illnesses at all. Let's take a close look at the subtle distinctions in societal treatment.
Cancer is, in many of its forms, impossible to prevent with the decisions one makes. I'm sorry normies, but that means you can't tell poor Timmy to shower his tumor away. People that suffer from cancer are praised for their bravery; they are the beneficiaries of myriad charities, as well as the objects of ad campaigns and propaganda. Just like inceldom, cancer is a terrible disease, but only one of the diseased individuals will receive love and compassion while he suffers; the other will be taunted as he suffers in solitude.
Furthermore, if we look at how people, reddit especially, treats depressed people, we see an even cleared example of the double standard that derives from pure hatred of incels. Can you imagine the fervent rage that reddit would unleash if someone told a depression sufferer to 'just stop being sad'? And yet, that is the advice incels receive daily. We suffer the same, and yet, while others are supported, we are condemned.
TL:DR - plz read, it's not like you're too busy banging sluts. If you are: Incels might just be the most universally hated and discriminated against members of society. In spite of this, and where other hated sects have been assisted, incels are ridiculed and hurt further for merely existing. There is no help because they are deemed unworthy of it. It is not seen as noble to fight for incels rights as it might to fight for the rights of women or minorities, so we must suffer, because to propagate our suffering is seen not as cruel, but as just.
(Emphasis original)
Teenage girls are pure evil
So there I am, just walking down the road minding my own business, heading to work. I have my typical black hoodie up to hide my subhuman face and am walking with my shoulders slouched and looking right at the ground so as to avoid people taunting me. As I'm rounding the corner a group of teenage girls are heading to school and they must have caught a glimpse of my hideous face and one of them pushes one of their friends into me, which almost knocks me into the road. They then walk off laughing while I have to cope with the embarrassment that I just got pushed around by a bunch of subhuman sluts.
This is the future generation of evil whores that will inherit our planet. Women are clearly becoming even more evil, stay vigilant my fellow Incel brethren.
[ in response to an admitted pedophile on reddit ]
And those who say you judge you, don't like you, or think you should be ashamed of yourself are the exact same fuckwads who oppose gay marriage rights or hate a girl for thinking she might like another girl. There's nothing wrong with your, mine, or anybody's sexuality. It doesn't matter if you like men, children, objects, women or all of the above. Sexuality, to the best of our scientific knowledge, is something we are born with and based on our genetic makeup. It is not a product of our surroundings and certainly not a choice. You try and tell a gay man to like women, see how well that goes in terms of making him be 'attracted' to something different.
I'm actually really surprised that there are skeptical voices in here. Seriously? On Reddit?
Pedophilia is no more a sickness than homosexuality is. It is only sick if you abuse/exploit children.
[ in response to someone asking a self-proclaimed non-offending pedophile how he knows he wont abuse a child ]
I don't know, how do you know you won't go around raping and molesting everything you're attracted to?
The reason nonviolent "soft" pedo's like him can be so certain, is the same way you can be certain, or not, that you would not rape or molest a grown women in a vulnerable state. There was a post somewhere that I lost that was getting upvoted heaps that said "how can you be certain if you weren't put in just the right circumstances where odds were good nobody would know about it, that you wouldn't slip and ruin a persons life". Well imagine that scenario with an adult women. Maybe she drank too much at a party, passed out, and nobody else is around. Although a small margin of ethically devoid human beings would take advantage of a women in that scenario, the majority would not. The point is you can have ethics, and still be attracted to young girls. It's the same for pedo's. Although you're attracted to young girls, you can still have a moral and ethical objection to molesting and raping children or ANYONE else.
As to the point about "well what happens when you have kids?" it's the SAME THING. I'll assume you're attracted to adult women. Does that mean you should avoid adult women because you might molest or rape them? When you go to work, or school, or church, or reddit meet-ups, whatever, just because you're attracted to someone or some thing does not mean you're just going to start raping it no matter HOW attractive it is.
In all of the drama of this thread I haven't seen 1 link or suggestion of someplace someone can go talk to somebody if they want to change or feel guilty about their proclivities.
I am glad, SO glad this post came up because it's the only rational discussion of the issue I've seen ever. But also because I feel hugely relieved to know I'm not alone.
I don't fucking get this analogy. I'm serious. I honestly don't give a fuck if two adult men want to kiss each other in public and fuck and whatnot, their happiness is not my concern and certainly not my problem; they're responsible adults and should know what they're doing.
I feel the same way about a consenting child and an adult. Now of course someone is going to correct me and say a child cannot consent, but I believe that they can and I am not flexible on this point. I really do believe that if both parties are okay with the act, there is no crime and nothing morally wrong.
[Comments under "Why is it that black men rape white women at a hugely disproportionate rate than the other way around?"]
@Bigdickedelf
Sheboons are mostly ugly. White women are the prize of non white men; especially niggers
It would be like getting your offspring to jump a hundred thousand years forward in evolution. White women are the prize.
Young FHO logic in full display. I think you guys are right
We are in class discussing the chapter we were supposed to read. In the chapter it says women like dark triad personalities. Someone brings this up and it was as if they spit in the face of every female. Countless "i dont go for that" or "i hate those types" from ALL of them this includes the regulars the snowflakes the sororities. Despite what the book says and what they professor says they refuse to reason.
The best part of this is they then proceed to say all guys care about sex as the number thing. U would think they were just exaggerating but the majority said no they were 100% serious they think all men purely want sex first and foremost. Wonder what personality is like that?
One of the primary motives of Chinese immigrants to the West, apart from the higher wages - is that they won't have to be competing with other Chinese people.
Consider the competition-as-result-of-large-population, and the natural intelligence of the Chinese:
150 IQ for example, that's like 1/10000 in any Western country where the average IQ is like 95-100 - but in the developed regions of China (Zhejiang/Hebei-Beijing) where avg IQ is like 115, that's like 1/100 AT BEST.
Then consider the acceptance rate for places like Tsinghua - 0.1%. Harvard brains are third-rate in comparison - even if their facilities are first rate.
Anyway, the net result of this is that many people in China who would otherwise have been highly successful workers or entrepreneurs anywhere else, end up in the middle rungs of Chinese society. And then they look to the other side of the Pacific and see people who are relatively dumber living easier lives, and without understanding the underlying racial issues in Western societies (Ivy League Asian penalty, Bamboo Ceiling, Hollywood Cuckasians, etc.) - they drop everything and move.
It's the same for all other East Asian countries. Life in the West is just THAT MUCH easier from a non-sexual perspective no matter how much more developed East Asia becomes - so much that no one here really cares enough to do anything about Hollywood's blatant WMAF/Anti-Asian-Male productions despite what r/aznidentity would have you think.
As a tangent, I can easily rationalize the Ivy League Asian penalty for this reason. The cognitive gap is just too big - and to remove the penalty would be the same as cutting out all other races from social mobility (apart from East Asians, Brahmin Indians, and Ashkenazi Jews).
[OP of "How redpilled are you?"]
[Comments under post '"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."' by DownWithPastryarchy showing a Canadian flag to which was added a Crescent and Arabic writing]
@NatsirasistiFIN
@DatGuyIs-a-Cuck
((Globalists))
Oy
Vey!
[Comment under "This is Constantinople, capital of the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) Empire. For hundreds of years they prevented Muslim Expansion into Western Europe. Sadly it was besieged in 1453 and fell to Ottoman forces. Never forget."]
Seriously, I'm in my 30s, never enlisted though I come from a military family, and have a comfortable job and a family I love dearly. I'd strongly consider volunteering if there were a call to retake Constantinople. Is this how crusader armies felt??
Having a waifu is just another form of female worship
Cut that shit out.
Stop worshipping fictional female characters, it's pathetic and THEY'RE WOMEN FOR FUCKS SAKE.
Hell I'd say that simply liking a female character is just another form of female worship.
Females need to be violently shoved off the pedestal, not put on an even higher one.
All females deserve our utter hatred. Including ones that aren't real.
DAE hate mothers of betas?
All of their life most of them have been chasing for Chad cock and when they get married, settle and pop out a kid they suddenly have an urge to make their child the same beta they've been rejecting when they were young. They teach them that having a cute personality is the most important thing and that they should be obedient and respectful no matter what. It's like softcore cucking of your own child. Why would you do that?
You know that you rejected those type of guys in high school/college so why are you teaching your own child to be like that? You are teaching him how to pick up a 30+ year old woman instead of a young teen that thinks such guys are revolting. He isn't trying to score with you, a woman past her prime that got tired of her wild early years.
It makes me think that if women taught their adolescents to be an alpha there'd be less betas, hence less guys to settle for in the next generation when a cock carousel slut becomes unwanted by the top percentage of men after they are pumped and dumped. In conclusion, cucking your own seed is less important than perpetuating a mass supply for whores in early 30s. Disgusting.
I dream of living in an incel only society.
A world where all normies, women, and Chads are extinct and we live in a society of incels. A society of low value men rid of life's greatest reminders of our suffering.
Maybe one day, when artificial wombs become a thing and we can be rid of females, we can take a step towards a society like that.
This is an Enlightenment-descended idea so deeply embedded into modernity that it's hard to uproot.
The basic motivation comes from a good place. The idea is that diverse cultural and philosophical environments are darwinian, where only the fit survive and the weak die off. That's the way it is in nature, and the way it should be in human society.
But even in nature biodiversity's virtue is limited. Sudden introduction of foreign species is almost always enormously destructive, and does the ecosystem more harm than good even in the long term, often serving to reduce biodiversity--look at the introduction of the cane toad in Australia for example which has displaced many native fauna. Diversity is not everywhere and always good, and efforts to increase it often backfire. Lack of diversity is not the problem.
What's worse than lack of diversity is geographic isolation. Take for example New Zealand, which is quite biodiverse but due to its isolation has seen many native species disappear when inevitably some foreign species are introduced. In the human world this degree of isolation is very rare--maybe somewhere like North Korea.
At the very least, biologists recognize the sudden and artificial introduction of foreign species as a bad thing for the ecosystem. Why would we not consider the sudden and artificial introduction of foreign cultures a bad thing for the cultural ecosystem?
[OP of "Real Men rape"]
Not condoning domestic assault but what kind of woman would get off on rape?
The answer is a porn star,not known for rational behaviour.
There are 2 ways to Eradicate Slutiness from the Female Race
1. Remove them from society entirely. They never have any interaction with males, ever. They do dirty work in internment camps, and are artificially inseminated.
2. Remove them from society temporarily, until they are ready for an arranged marriage. During this time, they are constantly belittled and mentally abused to the point where they have no self esteem. Then, they will not have the courage or confidence to whore around.
(Comment by ban_collector)
Excellent ideas. Most of us incels would probably prefer the 2nd option because we get a wife, but maybe the first is more wise in the long run. The government will have to fund research to create artificial waifus for us in that case.
[Comment under "Shots fired from Based AF Ann Coulter"]
Why in the fuck does Israel have to take one single on of these goatfucking pedophile sub-humans ?
In fact, why the fuck does any country have take these pussy cunts ? 70% of these "refugees" are military age "men". Why don't they stay in Syria and fight for their country ? Because they are lazy, stupid, filthy, cowards.
Fuck these pussy goatfucking pedophile invaders of civilization. Fuck them all.
Religion is not the root problem, it's ethnicity. The Hui are basically Muslims Hans, and cause little trouble. The Uyghurs OTOH are a genetically distinct ethnic group (albeit the overwhelming majority of their East Asian admixture comes from the Han), so their actions reflect that.
Our language needs honorifics similar to the japanese
Just like the japanese do: Chan, sama, san, kami, kun, senpai, sensei, dono
Except ours needs to be more reflective our our fucked society:
Kuk - Clueless normie whose female has fucked countless guys.
cel - Average incel
roas - typical roastie
norm - typical normie in denial of reality
Dahc(pronounced daaaK) - typical chad
Ghad - A godly chad, the top 1% of males.
sati - A form of normie who reaches chad like status by compensating for his lack of genetics through status or wealth. Yet he will never be truly loved like a chad, he merely lives like one.
Examples: "Ah Elliot sati, your business is quite remarkable." -Eric. "Yes Eric sati, its too bad about James kuk and Ellis kuk who don't know we're fucking their girls." -Elliot. "What are you fags talking about?" -Anders. "Nothing Anders Ghad! Please excuse us." -Eric
"Ethnic diversity is our GREATEST strength!" Amirite?? LMAO. As much as America's open immigration reforms of the 60s has benefited me and my family, it most definitely harmed the average working class white Americans, which are a good majority of them. That's just a statistical fact. Moreover, modern America would be a much more peaceful nation had the original European colonialists just decided to pick their own goddamn cotton LMAO. But instead, you've now got a permanent third world population that breeds faster, disproportionately soaks up the welfare, and are only growing increasingly contemptuous of the dominant White culture.
Rap is the lowest form of music, in the technical sense, because it is the least musically complex. Inb4 you think I know nothing about rap/hip hop, I fucking exclusively listened to that shit while growing up as a teen, Pac, Nas, Big, Eminem, Immortal Technique, etc. were my idols, their songs resonated with me, because I felt like an outsider just like them. But now, I know who I am, there's absolutely no point for me to try and assimilate into American culture, I'll always be seen as an outsider. Asian enclave like those on the west coast are bubbles, and will never become widespread enough to truly change the wider perception of people in the world about what an American is suppose to be like. So once again, stop being so solipsistic and realize there are other people, even in other parts of America, who do not believe the things you do nor think AT ALL the way you think.
Guess what, the same fucking thing applies to China. China is run by Hans, because Hans can do the job better. People aren't equal. And there's no reason to believe different groups of people have equal capacity for success on the macro-level of society building and advancement. This a priori western liberal belief in the absolute equality of all people is completely non-substantiated empirically, and is actively harmful to humanity. This is why America has gotten things like BLM. Instead of taking personal responsibility, blacks can just point the finger to "institutional racism". What a joke. Don't hate on China for not emulating the same bullshit.
I find it impossible to be happy for people in relationships...
I find myself resenting all normies whatsoever with a burning passion. Whenever I see a happy couple, I pray with all of my heart that they break up and spend the rest of their lives alone. I want to see them suffer, I want their happiness to crumble as my hopes and dreams did years ago.
I wish they'd all die, every last PDA-engaging, love-stricken one of them. My blood boils at the thought of their very existence.
They want you to buy into the scam feminism and liberals have set up. So society can crash and be rebuilt up better the way they want it. Although a lot are just idiots who think anything goes will last forever. Neither of which will ever work out. Most dumb fuck liberals think they can just fuck the system forever and men will churn on. All it takes is for 10% of males to say "YA KNOW WHAT, FUCK THIS SHIT" and give up or seek justice.
Cunts don't give a fuck. They are too stupid to see 5 foot in front of them. Cunts are just gluttons for chad cock and beta bux. They think they can have it all forever with no consequences. They think betas and omegas will simply take this shit forever. They are very wrong.
Cunts have no concept of morality or justice or anything good at all. They are just parasitic & retarded children who will drain their host until it croaks. They are incapable of rational thought or positivity. They merely pretend to be those things just as they dress themselves up like angels with makeup and pretty clothes. Its all illusion. In reality females are demons in the flesh. Thus they deserve no rights of any kind.
The second female sexual desires matter your civilization begins to rot. It takes a while but every time it goes under. Thats why there are no matriarchies or history of females ruling a country in any way. Because the second they do they fuck it all up and bow down begging for that foreign alpha cock. Lots of suffering comes for everyone else when a nation falls. Which females don't give a fuck about. They love being conquered by other nations with brutal men and getting fucked by those men.
Female humanoid organisms are just worthless pieces of shit. They don't deserve any god damn rights. They don't deserve anything positive. Fucking pieces of shit. I could never feel sympathy for those parasitic shit lords. Females deserve to be treated lesser than shit as their inner quality exists as lower than shit.
World health organization considers being single a disability.
So where the fuck is our free shit?
The way I look at it is if I must be die alone, I deserve to die with things handed to me. It doesn't have to be a lot... Just enough for a cheap apartment and Nintendo DS without having to work and endure normies all fucking day. I'm sure my mother who is basically all the worst elements of a republican but also a degenerate liberal would be ashamed but my give a fucks went out the window as soon as women stopped giving me eye contact.
Their tax dollars belong to me since their hearts never will. Nomnomnom give me the welfare state communism.
Serious question you live in a majority white society and expect us not to receive the very best treatment because our ancestors built it. But complain how whites have an advantage in a white society. That's like me moving to another nation and demanding to be treated like a king because I deserve to be the best in your cultures society.
It seems childish and a mistake by all means take pride in yourself in people I know I do but once your ideology makes you demand pity and to have women thrown at you makes you seem like incel.
That's the issue with how you have your woman if they don't want to be with you they want status over many things that's why they will seek out the best provider which happens to be whites in who would have guessed western society. If by sticking it to whitey means taking his woman they are unstable and you do us a favor as racemixing is not good for the offspring as it breeds individuals like in r/hapas as they have no strong connection to either of their parents feeling unwanted and unwelcome rightfully so as the mix should never have happened.
[Comment under "Globalist billionaire David Rockerfeller dies on Barron Trump's birthday. Kek works in mysterious ways. HIGH ENERGY"]
Wake up, you sleepy head, rub your eyes, get out of bed! Wake up, the wicked witch is dead! He's gone where the goblins go below, below, below, yo ho Let's open up and sing, and ring the bells out! Ding-dong! the merry-o sing it high, sing it low! Let them know the wicked witch is dead!
Every country is implicitly an ethno-state. Yes, both China and Japan have foreigners of all races. But they are minuscule portion of their population. They are in no way threatening the cultural or racial integrity of historic China or Japan. Same with other non-European countries. India is deporting their invaders from the North, etc...
[OP of "Hi! I'm you're new moderator. A brief introduction."]
I've always had a deep-seated hatred towards left-wing ideologies, even when young and politically uncultured -- I've always been a rightist at heart, perhaps it is in my blood. After all, my father left communist-occupied Poland when he was in his 20s, views Reagan as a good man, and voted for Trump, unlike the corporate-communist Armenian that ideologically controls this website and tells us immigrants all hate white people and we must bend to their new world order.
While many here are Anarcho-Capitalists -- an ideology I disagree with, but one that I like, and I am indeed a fan of the Austrian school despite viewing them as a bit lacking in social and cultural issues. I can be best described as far-right and a bit "alt-right"ish.
Rest assured, though I am a race-realist, there will be no gas chambers for the likes of Rothbard or Mises. Only cigars and their perfume to mask the scent of spent helicopter fuel.
If women want to be seen as individuals they should start acting like individuals.
Currently, they pretty much all find the exact same men as attractive and the exact same men unattractive physically, personality wise, it's the same. While men find many personality types attractive women act as a hivemind finding the same personality type attractive (extroverted, assertive, no insecurities at all, etc.)
This backs up the fact women don't act like individuals too.
[Comment under "Ranked Societies"]
@Jaegerss
how they work
Your rank with in society would decide what rights you have, and how much you are allowed to earn and own. Moving between the ranks depends on your occupation, worth to society and the feats you have accomplished, for example a person from one of the lower ranks who invents a great invention would be upgraded to one of the higher ranks of society.
@Jaegerss
how muchs ranks there would be
It depends on the person, I personally think 6-10 ranks is enough, but some people argue for more or less ranks.
@Jaegerss
Any example of their implementation would also be appreciated.
I don't think a pure ranked system like some fascists advocate has been implemented yet, but close examples could be ancient Greece and Rome, and other ancient societies.
Some children initiate adult contact and are active participants.
Sorry, just trying to get your facts correct. You and u/herrhiskelig imply that a child would never choose to initiate or willingly participate in a sexual relationship with an adult. Studies show that you are both wrong.
You imply (wrongly) that only a person who is not entirely sound of mind would believe a child want to have sex with them.
Quote from: http://www.mhamic.org/sources/constantine.htm
research and clinical reports leave little doubt that some children do initiate the contacts and many participate willingly. Nine studies in the review confirmed this, although initiative on the part of the child was rare in father-daughter incest.
Children can enjoy sex and masturbation, many do. Children can initiate sex and some do. Children can be willing and even enthusiastic participants.
you should understand that NO, a child does not want to have sex with you
Yes, sometimes a child does want to have sex with an adult
No, a child cannot make choices in sexual matters b/c he/she is not developmentally capable of understanding the consequences and complexities of adult sexuality nor the risks involved. He/she doesn't yet know who to trust and why, how to protect himself, how to advocate or be an equal partner, etc. In many cases, the child isn't even physically developed enough for that level of interaction.
No, a child cannot make choices in sexual matters b/c he/she is not developmentally capable of understanding the consequences and complexities of adult sexuality nor the risks involved. He/she doesn't yet know who to trust and why, how to protect himself, how to advocate or be an equal partner, etc. In many cases, the child isn't even physically developed enough for that level of interaction.
Many children know how to be quite firm with their opinions, many are more firm with their opinions than adults. Though not all do, the study I linked originally found that passively unwilling children were the most often harmed by an adult/child sexual experience, actively unwilling children generally sought help quickly and actively or passively willing children generally enjoyed the experience and thus were less often harmed (some even benefited from the experience).
The "consent" part it mostly just opinion. This Alderson would disagree.
Alderson performed seven studies (some in collaboration with other scientists) throughout the 1990s on children’s capacity to give informed consent to medical procedures, and concluded that children as young as 5 or 6 are capable of informed consent if adequately informed. Waites (2005) argued very convincingly that her work and its conclusions translate readily into the sexual sphere, though he argues (badly) that children are not adequately informed about sex in our society and therefore cannot give informed consent to sexual activity. (The answer to that is obvious.) As far as I know, Alderson’s work constitutes the only sustained and detailed scientific analysis of children’s capacity to give informed consent, and before the 1990s no such analysis existed. Ages of consent were certainly not set on the basis of such capacity, and Waites shows how consent was not a genuine factor in so-called ‘age of consent’ legislation until the second half of the 20th century.
So 5 or 6 year olds are capable of making decisions on medical procedures (including "informed consent") if adequately informed, but not of consenting to sex. The only reason for this is that our society tries very hard to make sure that children are not "adequately informed" when it comes to sex. Which ironically, can lead to higher rates of unsafe sex when young t(w)eens begin to engage in sexuality, but have not been educated on safe sex - though I'm assuming we both agree that "abstinence only" sex education is a terrible idea.
You make a few more assumptions/implications about the sexuality. One is that any adult/child interactions are "adult sexuality", but in reality only a small minority of "sexual abuse" involves actual penetration and intercourse; likely because when the child is a willing participant and respected by their partner, than the child will say no when they don't enjoy something (and many children are not physically ready for intercourse) and have that choice be respected.
"oh this 10 year old wants to have an adult sexual relationship"
Again, you seem focused on the "adult", but you don't know that they original subject (the pedophile from the podcast) was in or wanted an adult sexual relationship. As I said above, most child/adult sexual interactions do not involve intercourse. It is more likely that the adult was participating at the child's level in order to make it fun for the child, or because the child did not want to participate in intercourse.
There are quite a few online communities (including r/pedofriends) of pedophiles who don't harm anyone. I am a pedophile myself and would never harm a child. Over 50% of child molesters are not pedophile (they have some other mental condition that leads them to molest a child).
Many pedophiles avoid children to avoid sexual feelings. I am not part of that group, I actively associated with children and have one girl I am very close with. I love her and would rather hurt myself than hurt her.
That said, there is a question of what exactly constitutes "harm". What if the child is a willing participant (maybe even the one pursuing more), society would say that kissing a child; even one who wanted to be kissed by you, is harmful. I don't agree with that, but I do follow the social rules in order to avoid legal issues (and to be able to keep seeing her)
Being good with kids seems to be a trait commonly associated with pedophiles. It is likely that we pay more attention to kids (and treat them with more respect).
It is okay to be sexually attracted to children, there is no harm in that. It is wrong to hurt a child, but an attraction does not lead to harm. Plenty of adults are attracted to other adults and manage not to hurt them.
I am a very positive influence on the lives of multiple children. Other people tell me so, their parents tell me so, the kids love to spend time with me. My closest relationship is with a girl who I am attracted to. She loves me and would live with me if given the chance, she comes from a negative home and I give her way more opportunities to do things (and attention and positive encouragement) than she gets at home.
I don't look at her and think I want to have sex with her. That is a vast oversimplification; like saying a man sees a women and just thinks I want to have sex with her. I want to provide her a source of comfort, a safe place to come to and a safe person to talk to. I want her to be happy, I want to help her grow into a capable and confident women, I want her to be successful in her life and yes, I would also like to have sex with her. I won't do the latter, but all of the former things are things I can and do do for her.
Saying Pedophile = wanting to have sex with a child, is like saying being attracted to an adult = want to have sex with that adult. While it is technically true; it is far too simplistic of a view to have real meaning. Just like other adults we want a relationship, we want the comfort of knowing someone we love loves us back, we want to help that person be happy and safe. Sure sex is a part of it, but it is nothing close to the whole.
That's sadly why you're considered to be sick in the head. Because you don't understand that it is NOT okay to be sexually attracted to kids. There is something wrong with each and every pedophile out there. Your refusal to admit your sickness is what makes you dangerous to be around a child. To have sexual desires towards a child is exactly like saying "I want to have sex with a child". You simply aren't saying it out loud. You're keeping it in your own head(And that's the scary part).
This is my last reply to this discussion. I am just appalled by everything you sick and demented people are saying. You're a sick fuck and like I said to the other person. I pray for any child that comes in contact with you.
So if a person thinks "I want to kill that person" are they a sick fuck even if they never act on it?
If a person thinks "I'd like to rape that person", but never acts on it, are they a sick fuck?
If a person thinks "I'd like to hurt that person", but never acts on it are they a sick fuck?
Or does thought-crime only apply to those have a sexual attraction to kids? I can't choose not to be attracted to kids anymore than a homosexual can choose not to be attracted to their own sex (note: I wouldn't chose not to be even if I could, but that's another story). I can chose how I act though and everyone who knows me finds my actions to be acceptable.
Having a single thought when you're angry about killing the person you're mad at? No, this is normal.
Constant thoughts about killing someone every day of your life? Yes. That is a sign of a mental illness much like being a pedophile.
Having a single thought that you may want to hurt a person? Perfectly normal.
Having thoughts every day that you want to hurt people? That's a sign of another mental illness.
Struggling every day of your life because you're sexually attracted to kids? Yes. I am sorry. That's a sure sign of someone with mental issues.
These are all signs of mental illnesses. Which is what you have -- an illness. Which is why you shouldn't be around kids nor should any pedophile. There's a reason adults with severe mental illnesses have their kids taken away. Endangerment. What makes you and the others sick fucks is not that you have a mental illness. It's that you're trying to defend it and say there's nothing wrong with it. That it's "okay". When it's not it's very far from being okay. This is what makes you dangerous to be around a child.
I don't have a mental illness, I have a sexual orientation. I am not ashamed of it, but I know that people would judge me for it no matter what my actions are. So I don't tell them. I'm not hiding it everyday, I'm going about my life without really worrying about it; but knowing I will never tell anyone.
By your logic being gay and hiding it is/was a mental illness.
Almost everyone I know (including many kids/parents) trusts me absolutely around kids. And I have never hurt a kid. I'd rather have them be the judges and have them judge my actions. They don't need to know my thoughts to judge my actions.
I don't constantly think about my sexual attraction to kids. It's more like having a friend who you are interested in romantically, but who see's you platonically. Sure sometimes it is awkward, but you still get along well and are good friends. You aren't likely to suddenly rape that friend. There's no all consuming sexual urge, it's no different than a sexual attraction anyone else feels.
It's only likely to get awkward in the case of pedophiles if the child returns the sexual interest. Than you have two consenting people who must withhold their feelings due to social stigma.
A child by law can't give consent. So you don't have two consenting people. You have 1 consenting adult and 1 poor child being mislead by said adult.
Consent laws are dumb. Children can consent, if two children have sex according to consent laws they raped each other (which is why a large number of sex offenders are minors). There should be extra protections for child sex. But they can consent.
When you were a child it's VERY likely a pedophile talked to you, maybe even held you, or even hugged you. Did you get hurt by it? most liely no. Although if you have been sexually abused I'm VERY sorry :-( it's terrible I know.
My issue with non-offending pedophiles is that the only thing differentiating some of them from offending ones is lack of opportunity and/or threat of incarceration.
Who says? I'm a non-offending pedophile and I've had more opportunities than I can count. Threat of incarceration is part of it, but not that big of a part.
The main reason I don't offend is because morally I will never hurt I child. I love children, I don't want to hurt them or cause them pain. I never so much as raise my voice to a child.
The only condition under which I would even consider having sex or sexual contact with the child is if I believed that the child wanted it (of their own free will) and would enjoy it (and probably also only if the child initiated it). I have never had that occur. If it did I would not consider it molestation and I would have no moral issues if I had sex with the child, but I probably would not do so for fear of incarceration (and also from concern that the child would be harmed in the long-term by societies negative views and perceptions of child sexuality and adult/child sex).
If you ever touch a child, even if you think they want it for whatever fucked up reason you can conjure up, I hope said child's mother finds you and puts a bullet in your skull.
You aren't human.
Many children are sexual (this is widely acknowledged by child psychologist), many (most) children participate in sexual play by themselves and/or with other children.
It is not unthinkable that a child would be interested in sexual play with an adult. I don't have to conjure up reasons when it is well known fact that many children are interested in sex.
I am just as human as you, and apparently a quite a bit more accepting human at that.
IAMA exclusive non offending pedophile.
I'm am attracted to girls 3-13. I'm not attracted to all girls, there is a certain type that I am mainly attracted to, just like with any other attraction. Some guys like blondes and others like brunettes. The emotional connection comes if I get to know the girl. There is a weird thing that if I'm in a shitty mood and I see a girl being cute, skipping or doing something else, it like instantly makes me feel better. But that isn't a real emotional connection at all.
If by "not crossing societies lines" you mean not molesting a girl. That easy. Just because I have this attraction doesn't mean that I don't know right from wrong. I know that acting on my urges is wrong and only leads to harming girls and that is the last things I want. I don't ever want to be the cause of a girl being hurt.
Society would say that just being around kids in general is crossing the line. If that is what you are meaning, well I don't follow that. I spend time with girls that are in my life, whether they are my family or my friends children or whatever. I'm not this devious person who only wants to harm a girl. I do truly care about the girls that I have a close relationship with. I love being a part of their life and being a good influence on them so they can mature and develop into successful women.
To be honest, I'd be uncomfortable if you were around my daughter but I suppose that's my own hang up. This subject is very interesting to me and I'm very grateful for your willingness to be open.
I'm sure a lot of people would be uncomfortable, but there are some that wouldn't be uncomfortable too. In my case only my parents know, that I like little girls. They know who I truly am and know I would never harm anyone.
But the girls I mostly am around, well their parents do not know at all. I fear that at this point in time, if they knew it would only cause the girls more harm. They would be questioned about everything I have done and most likely told that I every genuine nice thing I have done, was done to groom them. Where in reality, all the nice things have been done out of goodness and just myself being a nice person.
Who do you want to fuck, even though it would be a really bad idea
My friends 9 and 12 year old daughters
in response to a woman finding out her boyfriend is a pedophile
His sexuality probably can't be changed. But that doesn't mean he is a threat. Many men find woman attractive and are not found attractive by those woman. They don't go and rape them. So, your boyfriend isn't a threat to children just because he is attracted to them.
Remember, it isn't wrong to be attracted to children;
[Comment under '"Paris, once known as Europe's city of romance is now an Islamic terror hot bed. France, save yourselves in the upcoming elections!"']
Who are they going to elect that will not only stop kebab but remove kebab? All kebab must be removed - men, women, children.
