new

Gervás 152: You're a great great man David! You're right with what you wrote ... red twice the Greenland Theory. I, and many people focus for your safety. You deserve the biggest recognition?

Response: You've read that twice? How did you get past the Jews are elves of Santa part and not have a rethink? Or the part about the Loch Ness monster being a submarine? Or Doggerland being blown up by gunpowder to prevent the discovery of Greenland? Or Romans interbreeding with giants??

Gervás 152: Of course I had my
own questions not answered, but the whole was logic to me. To me it
is not because one or another (insignificant sometimes) detail is
doubtful, the entire history falls. It can happen sometimes, but here
there is too much logic. The Santa colours and the boots are indeed
intersting, and I wrote Taylor that the BIS, Banc of International
Settlements is also bootshaped, wich he didn’t mention in the book.
The jews as his elves making «gifts» for the good obedient guys,
yes, quiet a good substitute.
About The Loch Ness
monster I didn’t have an opinion because there are a lot of
theories, but who knows? With Doggerland I couldn’t find reason why
therefore Greenland would be more difficult to get to, indeed the
contrary when land stands in the way, but ... Doggerland sounds to me
similar to Diggerland.
Abraham’s real
name is actually Abu Ram and means father of Rome. To Abraham it was
promised that his people will become numerous like stars. This part
is a link too that the Bilbe is nothing than the history of the roman
people ... Minos and his bloodline of 13. And the giant tales are
much more numerous than I thought before (about 14 times? I don’t
remember). There are by all means a lot of giant bones around. The
old testament was anyway only released in the 17 th. while the «new»
testament already in the 14 th. appeared. The tales and sites in the
OT are nothing than medieval phantom eventss brought to an
illusionary past.
My questions for
example were more: Egypt = greco-Roman? And Australia on the south
pole?

That our entire
ancient high crops are greco roman I found in the meantime that it is
absolutely correct. And Minos could even have lived 200 or 300 years
closer to us. The answers, amongst others, I found in Anatoly
Fomenko’s New Chronolgy. Or the youtube channel newearth’s
survivors serie.

To Australia: I
could basically imagine that the earth is a kind of a oblated
sphere/disc as Taylor says, simply because the flat earth theory
seems partially a Jesuit Psy Op (Matthew Boylan for example tells
that he went to a Jesuit school); and another hint that it may be so
is that I don’t see a logic that the point of the pointed
continents, South America and Africa look outwards while the big
continentsmasses Asia and Canada/Alaska are clustered; the other side
around seems more logic to me, points towards a center while our
nordic polar circle could be the equator.

But what I don’t
understand: why sun and moon don’t pass on Australia like it looks
on our north pole and anyway on the northpole we would therefore
observe another behaviour??

Evolution makes no sense at all. I just don't see how any intelligent person could believe such nonsense. I mean, have you ever seen an ape that could be taught to do algebra? No! Other than the most basic skills (which a dog can also be taught), an ape does not have the capacity to learn anywhere near the human level. Apes are dumb! You can say a dog is smart (and it might be), but it can't logic like a human being can.

Furthermore, if we evolved from a lower species, then why is it that the apes didn't evolve in the evolutionary process? Come on folks, you don't need a PHD (post hole digger) to figure this out. Where are all those half man/half ape fossils which should be abundant in the earth's soil layers? They don't exist. This is what is known as the "missing link" by evolutionists. Notice that I didn't call them "scientists" because there is NOTHING scientific about evolution. Science by it's very definition means "the study of." To "study" something, it must be observable. Not only is evolution not observable, it is not testable or repeatable in a lab. Do you realize that evolutionists CANNOT display even ONE single proof of evolution...NOT ONE! Dinosaur fossils don't prove anything except that they existed. Whether dinosaurs existed in Biblical times or during a pre-Adamic period is debatable amongst theologians. Many preachers believe that Lucifer operated a kingdom upon the earth prior to Genesis 1:2. The Bible does support this theory with credible evidence. This is commonly known as the "gap theory." Regardless, the fact that dinosaurs once inhabited this earth adds no credibility to the THEORY of evolution.

(LATER)

Evolution is for stupid people, stupid because they refuse to acknowledge the Word of God in their life. There is NO WAY you can believe the Bible and evolution. But you say, "what about 'theistic evolution' where God created everything and then allowed it to evolve? I'm glad you asked. There is no such teaching found in the Bible. Genesis chapter one is very clear that God created this earth as we know it today in 6 days. "IF" there was a pre-Adamic creation, it was destroyed according to Genesis 1:2. I won't be dogmatic as to whether or not there was a pre-Adamic time period, but the Bible is certainly dogmatic that all life on this earth today was created within the six days of creation. The Bible is very accurate in it's chronology. The Bible dates itself from creation up until the end of the Old Testament. The Bible dates creation at approximately 4,000 B.C. This means that all life on earth today was created about 6,000 years ago! There was no evolutionary process! There is nothing to prove the THEORY of evolution (and that's all evolution really is...a bogus theory).

The fact that the "theory" of evolution is missing a critical link (the "missing link") should speak volumes as to the credibility of such a wild theory. The "missing link" is the Neanderthal man (the ape man). There is simply NO evidence of such theories. The few skeletal remains which have been dug up and claimed to be prehistoric could easily be the fossil remains of modern men. Bone structure also varies from one ethnic background to another. It is very possible to dig up a skeleton with more rounded bones (which is more common in African anatomy). This is NO evidence of evolution, but of variances in human anatomy. East Asian people (such as China) have very unique facial features which are more pronounced. Evolutionists have not discovered a Neanderthal man! You can believe anything if you repeat it to yourself long enough. Many people want to believe evolution because it relives them of the horrifying possibility that there might actually be a holy God watching how we live. Whether you believe there is a God or not, the thought of both possibilities is very freighting. I believe in God.?