top

Laura Wood #fundie thinkinghousewife.com

RECENT comments made to a group of athletes in Rome offer a striking example of why Bob Prevost (aka “Pope” Leo XIV) is not Catholic, not a member of the Catholic Church and most certainly not a pope. Though his remarks would not offend most listeners today, who in fact would likely find his message appealing, they are devoid of any real supernatural content. Bob delivers a humanistic, pagan message — with no acknowledgement of the dangers of excess or making sports the goal of life — the sort of thing the president of a secular college might say in a speech before a sports championship.

His speech embodies the spirit of pagan Rome today — focused on the pleasures of warm relationships, lumping all religions into one sugary cake, and glorifying the human god. It is the sterile, religious counterpart to the dehumanizing New World Order.

Laura Wood #fundie #wingnut thinkinghousewife.com

CAN the Catholic Church be found in the buildings […] that go today by the Catholic name and profess allegiance to Rome?

No, the Catholic Church cannot be found today in these buildings […] because they do not profess the Catholic religion, but a syncretistic, modernist faith and all their priests, bishops and popes since Vatican II have lost their offices because of heresy and apostasy. […]

Can the Catholic Church be found in churches […] that offer the Traditional Latin Mass and appear to accept all of Church doctrine while professing allegiance to apostate Rome?

No, the Catholic Church cannot be found in diocesan churches that offer the Traditional Latin Mass because they are in communion with heresy and apostasy and all of their priests are either laymen or clerics who have fallen from office. These alleged clerics profess by the fact of their position a syncretistic creed, not the Catholic faith.

[…]

Can the Catholic Church be found in “sedevacantist” or “independent” chapels run by supposed clergy who reject the legitimacy of the Vatican II popes, the modernist religion and its new worship, claiming to offer the faith in all its purity?

No, the Catholic Church cannot be found in these renegade chapels because they operate outside the authority of the Catholic Church, defiantly rejecting the government of the Church, its divine laws and the teaching of the last true pope, Pope Pius XII, who explicitly forbade such novelties during a papal interregnum. […]

Where then can the Catholic Church be found?

The Catholic Church can be found among those who profess the Catholic faith and refuse all of the above, retaining the remaining practices available to them by Church teaching and participating in all the sacraments, except Holy Orders, by fact […] or desire […], as explicitly approved by the Council of Trent and constant Church tradition.

Isn’t it absurd to claim that the Catholic Church has been reduced to such a few without any clergy at all?

Alan #racist #conspiracy #wingnut #psycho thinkinghousewife.com

[excerpts from a long rant about his dad and Charles Lindbergh]
Roosevelt tried to demonize Lindbergh because he spoke the truth when he named three groups of war-provocateurs. If Americans had acted on the advice of Lindbergh and America First, they could have kept hundreds of thousands of their most valuable men alive at home instead of being killed on other continents in a war engineered to make the world safe for Communists.

In an age when Big Lies are commonly asserted as truth, Americans are still told by their government and the mass communications industry that Lindbergh was a “racist”, “isolationist”, and “Nazi sympathizer”. For which groups is name-calling standard operating procedure? Communists and “Liberals”. The truth is of course quite different. Observe that a man who advised Americans to mind their own business at home instead of get dragged into international adventurism is painted as a Bad Man — whereas men whose policies led to the death of thousands of American men and thousands of Japanese civilians (in 1945) are painted as Great Men. Even those who profess admiration for Lindbergh the pilot will accommodate claims that there was something wrong in his advocacy of self-defense for Americans instead of self-immolation. Such is the power of decades of propaganda and the credulity of people who are willing to be deceived.

[…]

Like most other Americans in those years, my father probably looked upon FDR the way the mass propaganda industry painted him: As a kindly, honorable man and president. I doubt my father would have believed that radio and newspapers would assert or rubber-stamp lies, or that Roosevelt would lie both about Lindbergh and about a “surprise” Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor as an excuse for dragging Americans into the war. I do not know whether my father could have imagined evil on that scale.

Alan #wingnut thinkinghousewife.com

Two years ago I wrote about peace-loving Communists in St. Louis who staged a riot outside city hall in 1932. (TTH, Feb. 22, 2024) They “demanded” more welfare handouts to more people.

Two weeks ago, a group of Communist-trained agitators returned to city hall and tried for twenty minutes to shout down the mayor of St. Louis as she was giving a speech. They “demanded” more of other people’s money to benefit victims of a tornado last year. Five agitators were arrested and charged with peace disturbance.

Standard Communist operating procedure in both cases. They are so funny. They would have us believe they possess a “right” to “demand” other people’s time, attention, or money, and a “right” to shout down anyone they please whenever they profess good intentions. Aha, ha, ha, ha, ha! Of course they have no such rights because there are no such rights. Communist agit-prop is so predictable.

The only difference between the response to such thugs in 1932 and the response today is that the former was more sensible. News accounts then used plain words in clear, concise prose, whereas today they read like mush because they are festooned with vague, “sensitive”, PC-ready-made phrases in order not to hurt the feelings of thugs and their apologists.

Which proves that at least in some ways, people in the news business in 1932 — with only words and printing presses available to them — had more savvy and good sense than most of them have today with all their pretentious high-tech gadgets. Smart gadgets are an easy sell to dumb journalists and a dumbed down population who have been taught to prefer mush over plain language.

Laura Wood #conspiracy thinkinghousewife.com

[image]https://thinkinghousewife.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/climate-crisis.webp[/image]

How do I know that the climate CRISIS is a scam?
Here are five reasons
1. They preach sacrifice, but don’t practice it.
2. They fly across the world to tell us how to reduce our “carbon footprint”.
3. Wealthy alarmists still buy oceanfront property.
4. They rarely criticize China and India.
5. Their “solutions” always mean more government power and higher costs.

Thanks for reading!