Top posts since
last month

www.thinkinghousewife.com

Laura Wood #fundie thinkinghousewife.com

[From “Revolt of the Intellect against God”]

LIBERALISM in religion asserts that everyone is entitled to his own opinion — and to absolute respect for his opinions. It thus has the great advantage of giving the appearance of flexibility, open-mindedness, kindness and generosity

Yet beneath the surface lurks that horror of all horrors — dogma, the very thing Liberalism claims to reject

Beneath the appearance of complete tolerance, one finds stern, unyielding disapproval. Those who do not accept the primacy of personal opinion and hold that religious truth is based on the authority of God’s revelation, on the testimony of His word, (opinion be damned), are in for a rough time

Liberalism, as Fr. Felix Sarda Y Salvany wrote in 1899, “repudiates dogma altogether and substitutes opinion, whether that opinion be doctrinal or the negation of doctrine. Consequently, it denies every doctrine in particular. If we were to examine in detail all the doctrines or dogmas which, within the range of Liberalism, have been denied, we would find every Christian dogma in one way or another rejected—from the dogma of the Incarnation to that of Infallibility[…]
Liberalism — what is today often known as Modernism — was at the time Salvany wrote in the nineteenth century, the “dominating idea.”

Since then it has decimated the hierarchy of the Catholic Church and we live in the wilderness that Jesus himself predicted would come upon the earth before his glorious return

Tolerance and openness have created a wasteland, where true charity is as rare as water in the Sahara, where tolerance is vicious and the dogma-less are the most dogmatic of all. Man is prouder than ever of himself. He has “revealed himself to himself,” as the saying goes

He has successfully committed the final revolt, his mind and will against God, his own opinion first — and God seems not to have noticed

Alan #wingnut thinkinghousewife.com

Two years ago I wrote about peace-loving Communists in St. Louis who staged a riot outside city hall in 1932. (TTH, Feb. 22, 2024) They “demanded” more welfare handouts to more people.

Two weeks ago, a group of Communist-trained agitators returned to city hall and tried for twenty minutes to shout down the mayor of St. Louis as she was giving a speech. They “demanded” more of other people’s money to benefit victims of a tornado last year. Five agitators were arrested and charged with peace disturbance.

Standard Communist operating procedure in both cases. They are so funny. They would have us believe they possess a “right” to “demand” other people’s time, attention, or money, and a “right” to shout down anyone they please whenever they profess good intentions. Aha, ha, ha, ha, ha! Of course they have no such rights because there are no such rights. Communist agit-prop is so predictable.

The only difference between the response to such thugs in 1932 and the response today is that the former was more sensible. News accounts then used plain words in clear, concise prose, whereas today they read like mush because they are festooned with vague, “sensitive”, PC-ready-made phrases in order not to hurt the feelings of thugs and their apologists.

Which proves that at least in some ways, people in the news business in 1932 — with only words and printing presses available to them — had more savvy and good sense than most of them have today with all their pretentious high-tech gadgets. Smart gadgets are an easy sell to dumb journalists and a dumbed down population who have been taught to prefer mush over plain language.

Alan #racist thinkinghousewife.com

[From “The Cost of Accomodation”]

What a difference a century makes. Here is one example:

It must have been in 1964 when I first walked into the Cleveland Rexall Pharmacy on South Grand Boulevard in south St. Louis[…]The Cleveland Pharmacy was midway on the path I walked

I bought magazines there in 1965-’67. A radiator stood in a corner near the window. The magazine rack was to the left as you walked into the store. It was a very modest affair, compared with today’s magazine displays festooned with sensation, filth and ugliness[…]
Years went by, and then decades. I stopped at the Cleveland Pharmacy less often. My last visit there was in the 1980s or early 1990s. It was still pretty much the same as it had been in the 1960s. But the neighborhood around it was changing–gradually at first, and then increasingly obviously but not for the better[…]The old setting and neighborhood were all-White. The new setting and neighborhood were being made increasingly Black. I did not realize it at first, but I was now witnessing the surrender of an orderly neighborhood to an undeclared “public-private partnership” of thugs (on the streets) and excuse-makers (in the legislature and the courts)[…]
In the 1950s, my grade school classmates and I became experts in walking the streets and alleys in the neighborhood around that drug store. We were too young to know anything about the building’s history. It was called the Roosevelt Apartments and it opened in 1927[…]The building was advertised as “One of the most notable improvements of the South Grand district… It is fireproof”[…]
A century later, “One of the most notable improvements” had been made into a jungle habitat on a busy commercial street in a neighborhood that was once clean and orderly[…]
There is not a trace remaining of the authority, knowledge, confidence and pride of White men like those who designed and built the Roosevelt Apts. Instead, today’s White men exude appeasement, apologies, and accommodation

Laura Wood #conspiracy thinkinghousewife.com

[image]https://thinkinghousewife.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/climate-crisis.webp[/image]

TranscriptHow do I know that the climate CRISIS is a scam?
Here are five reasons
1. They preach sacrifice, but don’t practice it.
2. They fly across the world to tell us how to reduce our “carbon footprint”.
3. Wealthy alarmists still buy oceanfront property.
4. They rarely criticize China and India.
5. Their “solutions” always mean more government power and higher costs.

Thanks for reading!