Vuldykk #homophobia

Vuldykk #homophobia twitter.com

I don’t believe people are born gay but even if they are... it’s an urge or attraction that isn’t normal. Man is for Woman, Woman is for Man. Anything else is obviously unnatural. If I was “born” with the urge to lick kids does that make it acceptable?

8 comments

It has existed in every single culture and it's found among animals, it's as natural as being straight. That's it. How many times must we refute this?

@Speakeasy #75239
How many times must we refute this?

Until nobody responds with “STFU!!!! I would never do it! No evidence beyond that should be NECESSARY to know that it’s UNNATURAL!!”

Who cares if it’s natural. The question is: is it harmful? He almost kinda got it, with the kid licking example (typo? did he mean: kicking?): no, do NOT act on harmful urges. But if there is actually a way to act upon it in a non-harmful way, for example, because there exist adults with complementary urges, then why the fuck not?!

@arp #75291

Ding ding ding.... we have a winner!

As arp so greatly said; thing is, it doesn’t matter if homosexuality is natural or not. As long as it remains a safe, sane, and consentual act between two or more adults, who the frigg cares what happens!? And pedophilia is not accepted because it’s none of those things (safe, sane, and consentual act between two or more adults), not because it’s natural or not.

You somehow commited the naturalistic fallacy and the moralistic fallacy in the same argument despite the fact that those two are inverses of each other.

“it’s an urge or attraction that isn’t normal.”

Why? Because you just said so? It’s a normal and natural variant on our species sexuality. Fucking deal with it already.

Plenty of animals don’t think it’s unnatural, which is a pretty good measure. That includes the male dogs that often mount each other, leading sometimes to freaked out owners! Also, it’s not normal to be a bigot.

Vuldykk #homophobia twitter.com

8 comments

Confused?