RE: It's over

I have to agree completely with your comment in bold. Women evolved highly intuitive eugenicist senses and other biological attributes when it comes to picking a mate. The end goal of women is to pick a mate that can support themselves and their progeny when it comes to resources. They choose tall Chad because he looks dominant compared to other men; in caveman times lesser men were servile to Chad or be ******, hence it ingrained in women's brains. In modern times tall handsome chads still look like winners but also are assumed to have resource acquisition because they move up in ranks easier and are socially treated better than say a child looking manlet. Nevertheless, the problem with modern day society is careerism and cultural decay of nuclear family values. Hence, as women become more career oriented; they will find that all the potentially viable, genetically healthy average males they rejected in the past will work against them in the end. These careerism women sacrificed their fertility in turn for their vain ego, narcisstic tendencies and materialistic comforts. Hence, when their maternal instinct tells them desperately to procreate with any 'good' male they can find; they soon realize they are too old now, and no male wants to procreate with them because they have better options available elsewhere (i.e. younger, more fertile women with looser standards that are willing to compromise. Or men simply using escorts and staying bachelor's). In summation, career-driven women are a biological dead end in terms natural selection because their vain ego, narcissism, inability for self reflection and unrealistic standards in a mate is their downfall in the end.