“Evolution is not proved”
It’s been observed in the lab, which is far better than you’re expecting, but still doesn’t move the Theory to a Law. Science doesn’t work that way.
“Question for those well-meaning people who defend the theory of evolution for human origins; which evolved first: the digestive system,”
You mean the human digestive system? Well, we evolved from existing animals that were able to eat something to survive long enough to evolve into us.
“the food to be digested,”
We started out as scavengers. So, the ‘food’ we digested was the remains of other animals after the lions were through with them. And nuts, berries, inattentive rodents, whatever we could find.
“the appetite,”
That would be something else we inherited from previous beings.
“the ability to find and eat food,”
Inherited.
“the digestive juices or the body”s resistance to its own digestive juices?”
Inherited. I mean, there was an existing, complete, living organism that mutated slowly into being humans, and what worked would have been retained.
“DNA or RNA to carry the DNA message to cell parts?”
That’s a LOT older than humans, you know.
“The lungs, the mucus lining to protect them, the throat or the perfect mixture of gases to be breathed into the lungs?”
The mix of gases didn’t evolve. All live evolved to take advantage of the gases around us. Plants the CO2, animals the O2.
“The Bible warns us about science falsely so-called.”
Yes, but CALLING evolution false science doesn’t make it so. You have to actually pony up a disproof.
“Charles Darwin had a degree in Theology not Science.”
Doesn’t matter a damn.
“He stated “To suppose that the eye could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd to the highest degree.”
And then in the following paragraph, explained HOW the eye COULD have developed.
You need to read science to find a way to defeat science, not quote-mining liars or creationists.
