[T]he Latin Alphabet is a fallen alphabet. How so?

The letters have a phonetic meaning only. The original alphabet (from which the Latin one is derived) had letters that each had multiple symbolic meanings.

[…]

I prefer to go with paleo-Hebrew because the more modern/Aramaic versions of the letters have lost much of the original, intuitive symbolism.

So you have a set of around 20 symbols that each have at least 2 or 3 potential meanings. And this is in addition to a phonetic meaning (the sound) for each letter.

I won't bother with "Science" but I will point out the religious significance of this.

All of the Torah (ie. first 5 books of the Old Testament) was originally written in the Hebrew language and in the paleo-Hebrew alphabet. That means the words were all made up of symbols with multiple meanings. If you don't know the meanings of the letters and you don't have "cultural familiarity" with the language... you'll miss out on some of the fundamental meaning.

How about the Bible?

All of the Bible was originally written in either Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek. The first part is basically all Hebrew with a little bit of Aramaic. And I think the New Testament is mostly/all in Koine Greek.

The thing to realize is how much meaning is lost if/when you translate Hebrew (with Hebrew letters/symbolism) into English... using that "fallen" Latin alphabet.

Once you understand this, you will see a modern English language/Latin alphabet Bible in a completely different way. It's a good effort. And a lot of the meaning is still there. But a modern Bible is like an abandoned ancient city in the jungle... all covered up in earth and plants.

[…]

If you want to be like Indiana Jones, you have to start digging. In this case, that means learning at least 2 things. The original Hebrew words and how they were spelled in that original Hebrew alphabet.

I doubt that 1 person in 100 will really appreciate the significance of what I just wrote. But, for anyone who's interested... here it is.