RE: Why fetus is considered woman's body if it is created by fusion of man's sperm and woman's egg and it only feeds off woman? I would understand if fetus was only womans egg, but its also man's cell. Born kids are also feed off woman yet nobody says they are woman's body.

The unborn are not the woman’s body. The woman simply claims ownership due to location. It’s basically slavery.

Ho- How is that slavery? Im putting the organs in my body to work with no pay. Is that slavery? No, It's not. Just like the mother calling the fetus her's, it's not slavery! It has no thought, no life to be killed. Its a possiblity, that's it. But if that "child" is saved lets say, they miss behave then what are you gonna do? Say " I brought you into this world and I can take you out." God dammit.

Deciding that another person is your property is slavery.

And thats not a person, its a possiblity.

There was a time where the US Supreme Court said that slaves were not fully human. They did this to deny them their humanity and to excuse their mistreatment so that they would continue to be treated less than human.

The Dred-Scott decision was wrong and was later reversed because it was wrong.

Denying the humanity of the unborn is no less egregious and just as wrong as denying other human beings their humanity.

Your argument is a losing one.

Oh real rich coming from the same side as the people who wish to deny the humanity of trans people and just queer people as a whole, seeing us as mentally ill and pedophiles, groomers and the like. So I could say the same about your argument.

The topic of trans rights is separate from this. This is the topic. Stick to the topic. Trans rights and mental Illness are another discussion.

However, I don’t see anyone actively denying the right to life of trans people.