Alright so let's put this into terms you can understand.
A guy could walk into the party, take a date rape pill himself, lay down buck-naked and spread-eagle on a bed before he passes out and still be completely 0% at fault.
Better? Because both are true, it doesn't mean they weren't stupid actions, but when someone is raped it is due to the aggressive actions of another person NOT their own. Doesn't matter the gender, or the situation.
Na-ah. Millions of people have aggressive sex every day. It is our biology. It is just some stupid attention whore cunts learned how to gain notoriety in some modern societies while doing so.

So, in your opinion, what is required for something not to be treated "rape"? Signed waiver?
Should next time I come home late and see my wife sleeping in some sexy wear be afraid of touching her because she clearly didn't gave me any consent yet?

That is a FANTASY, and it is NOT rape by any means. Men have the fantasy too.

The only difference between "fantasy" and "rape" is whatever she liked her fucker or not. And that's royally fucked up part.

Originally Posted by Crissi
"Consent need not be expressed, and may be implied from the context and from the relationship of the parties, but the absence of objection does not of itself constitute consent." Wikipedia

[Url=https://www.mmo-champion.com/threads/1276650-CNN-grieves-that-guilty-verdict-ruined-%E2%80%98promising%E2%80%99-lives-of-Steubenville-rapists?p=20548464&viewfull=1#post20548464]Being at underage party with alcohol drinks is a "there's very likely there will be sex" situation in my book. Going there instead of staying away is pretty much implied consent. And please, don't spout nonsense "she couldn't know that!" Pretty much every girl know that at about 13 yo nowadays if not sooner.