image
Shaken Baby Syndrome and SIDS are deplorable FAKE NEWS used to cover up vaccine-induced injury and death. #StopVaccineMandates
8 comments
This is not the first time anti-vaxxers have claimed that Shaken Baby Syndrome is actually the result of vaccines, by the way. And this is not just theory: There are several cases where fatal abusers have used that excuse and indeed attracted activists in their favour.
I can see no reason why they would do that which does not make them even viler.
Are they so gullible that they buy the lies of monsters who fatally abuse their children and cover for them?
Are they so dishonest and desperate that they will jump at any opportunity to claim something as "vaccine damage", no matter how vile?
Or, possibly worst:
Do they secretly see themselves in the same camp as people who kill their own children and are already preparing their own excuse for when they go to far?
I don't even know why Shaken Baby Syndrome is even relevant. Maybe you can't injure a baby by shaking it? So what? It still doesn't prove that it's vaccinations. It could just as easily be a case where the doctor is covering up that they don't know, or that they screwed up something and don't want to admit it. Similarly, you could shake a baby to death while an anti-vaxxer watched, and they'd probably admit SBS is real and be horrified at the lengths you go to prove a point, but it still wouldn't prove anything about vaccines being safe and effective. It's completely irrelevant.
This makes no sense. If you're going to cover up vaccination side effects with a huge conspiracy, why choose child abuse and mystery death? There are no vaccination for those.
Wouldn't it make more sense, and be more efficient, to tie the deaths to something that requires vaccination? Say the babies died of Whooping Farts or Plaid Fever or the Gizmonic Plague? THEN you can drive fearful parents into doctor offices to further vaccinations, to make sure they're up-to-date. More bang for your buck.
And how would you choose between the two conditions for a conspiracy? Shaken Baby leads to prosecution. So now you're not only faking the diagnosis, but you have to fake the evidence to prosecute a parent who was already behaving the way you wanted them to, they had the kid vaccinated. But SIDS, no one gets punished. It's tragic, and sad, but these things happen.
So how do you choose who gets the 'child abuse' fake death and who gets the 'act of god' fake death? And why choose ANY parents for prosecution? Why tie up the courts with fake Shaken Baby when what they really want is to prosecute the anti-vaxxers for child endangerment?
THis is really a vile, die-in-a-fire sort of conspiracy theory, but it really needs a lot more thought put into it, it just doesn't fit together at all.
If a brain-dead defense like that ever stands up in court, and I can't see how it would since shaken baby syndrome has a host of symptoms, then these anti-vaxxers have blood on their lying hands. Hell, they already do. I find them to be among the most egregious and shameless liars on the planet.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.