But sticking a body-part that you pee through, up where someone bleeds and where babies are born through, that’s fine and dandy? You do know that the men and women who engage in anal usually clean out the cavity first, right? Most people engaging in anal are heterosexuals, and I doubt that they get harassed and persecuted that often. I mean, who knows what kind of sex you have, unless you tell people?
Honey, it’s not the questions that are ridiculous, but your answers.
Not all gay people have anal, just as not all heterosexuals have anal, and some lesbians might have anal. I don't want to, but that's just me; I can't decide what others can do with their own bodies.
No, the relationship without the sex is still love and attraction, it’s building a life together, just as with heterosexuals. I don’t have the same relationship with any other man that I have with my husband, even ignoring the sex.
Blasphemy is only relevant if you put relevance to it; it only concerns you if you think it concerns you. It’s not simple and it’s ridiculous to say it. The Bible is only important if you make it important, for you.
Ethics and morals are completely divorced from the Bible, and many supposed Biblical people have behaved completely against common ethics and morals. The most basic standard is the Golden Rule; treat others as you want to be treated. Quite a few of the Religious Rightists behave in accordance with Everyone For Themselves, dolt. The Bible says it’s ok to kill unruly children, and women who are not virgins on their wedding night, but says nothing about men who are not virgins on their wedding night. It does not give a true set of moral guidelines, but a wicked and evil guideline.
To state “We don’t know if God is real” is not to be AGAINST God, nitwit. It’s just a fact. YOUR book says it does, but YOUR book is not relevant to anyone but YOU and to those who place relevance to it.
I concur with LC’s advice.