Your distorted perceptions interestingly sound like psychotic to me. Possibly also ignorance. When you "discover the world", you appear to compare it to some imaginary stereotype of a mythical frame of reference. But it's true that fashions come and go and repeat. It's also true that generational gaps can exist and the perception of aesthetics as well.
I see an attempt to enforce a type of stereotypical conformance where other people should submit to your particular tastes. When that becomes an obsession to a point where you must whine about it online, it may not be healthy. You claim to be going out and reaching out to people, but somehow remain impressionable by what you see, like if you remained sheltered somewhere forever.
Young people have a life to live and the fashions they embrace, including to attract, are not intended to attract earlier generations.
And if you want to be “radical,” or “counter-cultural,” — should I say “set apart” from the crowd — how about studying the Word of God and becoming a disciple of Jesus Christ?
What if it's just out of fashion rechauffe to them? What if some do, that you are misconstruing as non-Christian?
the history your teachers have hidden from you
What if they understand the difference between mythology, political revisionist history and history but don't subscribe to your malicious censorship conspiracy theories?
the work of the ministry
What if they understand that it's a type of human colonialism and the exploitation of the fidels?
Make your life count for something
Fundamentalists and their useful idiots constantly claim that life is worthless if not in their particular cult. Psychological manipulation, ignorance.
Being angry, hating America and God is definitely not working for you
Your last sentence exposed that your statements were neither about aesthetics nor about Christianity. It sounds like a dominionist takeover plot to me, using religious rhetoric to manipulate and promote authoritarianism. For those familiar with it, it also exposes that when you claimed that history was being censored, it's because you have a novel pseudohistory to impose.