“1. The Bible is 100% logical, without a single logical flaw in it. No other book comes close.”
Logic is just a tool for evaluating ideas. And it’s limited by the initial premise being used.
If you start with a belief that the bible is logical, it’s no surprise that you logic validates the bible.
“2. The Bible contains an immense amount of scientific foreknowledge.”
The Bible always describes the Earth as flat, under a solid sky, which holds back the Waters Above… Except when God opens little trap doors to let the rain come through.
“3. The water did not turn into wine at the wedding at Cana until it was tasted, consistent with quantum mechanics. Precise versions of the Bible translate this sequence correctly: "When the master of the feast tasted the water now become wine."[1]”
That’s not what ‘now become wine’ means you illiterate idiot.
“4. The "Son of Man" is a mistranslation:”
How can there be a mistranslation in a book without logical error?
“5. The perfectly written Epistle to the Hebrews is probably the "sermon" or monologue given by Jesus after the Resurrection when he met two travelers on the Road to Emmaus, as described in Luke 24:13-35.[2]”
Probably? It’s not CLEAR? You have to guess?
That kinda makes it less than perfectly written, no?
“6. Paul warned against being misled by liberal claptrap and the passage at 1 Corinthians 1:17 should be translated that way.”
Another mistranslation in the perfect book.
“7. Liberals are overly insistent on certain anti-Bible theories merely a way of pulling people, particularly students, away from the Bible.”
This is not an insight about the bible, it’s demonizing critics.
“8. The adulteress story is a phony insertion by liberals who quote it more than any other passage -- virtually all scholars confirm its lack of authenticity.”
An inauthentic insertion in a book without logical error.
So, the Bible is God’s word except where it isn’t….?
“9. In the Calming of the Storm, a precise translation”
Yet another translation error in the perfect book?
“10. The greatest distortion of the Bible by modern liberal translations is their denial of Hell, even though Jesus talked more about Hell than about Heaven.”
So, the Bible you worship is not an actual book, it’s an ideal that you fantasize about, loosely connected to what you can hold in Your hand.
“11. Genesis 1:2, properly translated,”
Son of a fuck…
“12. The many insights into physics (especially quantum mechanics and the Second Law of Thermodynamics) and mathematics (especially set theory) of the Bible,”
No. Just no. You’re clearly backfilling what you have accepted of science into your book of myths, which you correct as needed, anyway.
“13. The immense value of utilizing, in translating the Bible, modern new conservative terms that have originated since the King James Version, since Strong's, and even since 1900 and 2000. Examples include "demonic", "gambling", and "liberal claptrap."”
So, the perfectly logical book needs to be retranslated by conservatives for conservative tastes.