The so-called 'sorting' of the fossils is one of the biggest frauds ever invented by evolutionists.

And I would rather be sexually abused than killed and eaten - how about you. Beside how do you know that Ms. Sheep doesn't like what farmer Brown is doing...? Take a male dog with a woman - that dog is not being tortured - he can't wait. Really chsalvia you have to get over these puritian moral notions...

I think the only thing that kindness and love of Gays will get you is AIDS. [...]

I have heard of a few Gays who try to control their lusts and live chaste. They have a heavy cross to bear, but all the other Gays just want to kill them as traitors!

Everyone knows the 'Great Depression' was purposively created by the money trust to institute these communistic [welfare] programs. I don't love social security - exactly the opposite, I think it is sinful and theft - extreme wickedness... I consider Franklin Roosevelt as a Traitor with a capital T. He will go down in history with Benedict Arnold, Abraham Lincoln and Franklin D Roosevelt as the three largest and most notorius.

good post...criticizing selectionist evolution can get people ridiculed and ostricized -- even fired. This is why many scientists are afraid to speak up. Science is a communist establishment where competing views get snuffed out. It's no different than medicine. If anyone comes along and provides evidence for curing cancer or any other disease without drugs or surgery he is labeled a quack -- or even murdered if the treatment is highly effective. (See Dr. Gerson.)

These people are no different than the communists regimes that controlled Russia and China in the past. They must have things their way or no way, and they must supress all opposing views.

Who wishes to make such a simple blunder in elementary logic, as to say that we believe something to be true because it is in the Bible? Our answer to this is briefly that we prefer to reason in a circle to not reasoning at all. We hold it to be true that circular reasoning is the only reasoning that is possible to finite man. The method of implication as outlined above is circular reasoning. Or we may call it spiral reasoning. We must go round and round a thing to see more of its dimensions and to know more about it, in general, unless we are larger than that which we are investigating. Unless we are larger than God we cannot reason about him any other way, than by a transcendental or circular argument.

1) If Evolution is true then how do you account for Mental Faculties? Atoms banging against one another in randon fasion do not seem to make much since as to how our mental faculties can be reliable. You are stuck with Darwin's Doubt. I find this as a flaw in Atheistic Materialism.
2) Hell is not unjust. Biblical Christianity says that man is fallen. We are born bad so to speak, that is why we need the Grace of Christ. So it is not unjust for God to send us to hell. I would also ask the question: Who are you to talk back to God?

Actually back when I was an atheist I found the main selling point a freedom to do exactly as I pleased. I actually think this is a far larger selling point, but I have only ever seen a few atheists be willing to admit this.

If a talking donkey is so indicative of the gullibility of them ancient hebrews (and by implication, us Christians), why wasn't there more of them? How many talking animals are there in the Bible? 1....er...1.

Now give me one reason why it should be unlawful...

I gotta say that this whole issue is quite the comedy of errors right now. Unfortunately, it will become a destructive tragedy if gay marriage becomes the norm across the country.

[The reason I object to beastiality is] God's law - what is yours?

In my own opinon, sin is not about the victim, but about breaking a contract with God.

And yes Christian do believe in discrimination. As does Christ: [insert verses about casting non-Christians into fire]...

Now why do we teach our children as fact one theory, which science admits can not be proven concretely, and reject another as backwoods mysticism? Because maybe if our children realize that we were designed for a specific function we would be pressured into doing the unthinkable and perhaps live for something other than our own gratification.

I just find it hard to believe that anyone who claims to be a Christian would blatantly deny the clear evidence that I have given from the bible, and in return offer absolutely NONE!! Freak has done both, as well as many others who 'claim' to be believers. Again, there is no such thing as schizophrenia and if you believe that there is, you are wallowing in deception. You are denying the gospel of Christ, and calling God a liar.

I used to be impressed by all the 'scientific' dating methods until I finally looked into the subject in detail. It amazed me how people could delude themselves so badly. Thus, I finally concluded that there is no real reason to doubt the veracity of the Genesis narrative regarding a short age for the Earth and probably the universe as well.

But dishonesty should not be susprising -- the whole reason they push evolution is to exclude a Creator who has given us absolute moral laws (e.g. against dishonesty).

The Ten Commandments are blasphemy to a liberal because they... demand worship of only the Creator God of Scripture... Right there in the Ten Commandments is a divine command to keep an independence of church and state...

[Arguing against theistic evolution]And this overlooks the fact that evolution is a wasteful, cruel and inefficient process... and there is loads of death and suffering.

But all you are saying is that the majority finds human to animal sex objectionable. Well the majority finds homosexual marriage objectionable. So I guess you are with us on the gay marriage thing...

But strangely, compared with other A[ncient]N[ear]E[ast] literature, look how much [absurd stories] isn't in the Bible (pace Von Daniken!!). Only two animals speaking. Only once the sun standing still, and once going back. Only one flood. A rather muted Resurrection account.

In fact, a lot of reputable creation scientists (YEC and OEC alike) will admit when they've made a mistake, unlike anti-theistic scientists...

Opposition to civil rights is a good thing though. Their only mistake is that they applied it to race rather than subcultures. Separate, uglier and dirtier drinking fountains for liberals instead of blacks would have done wonders for society.

I've always wondered why a couple of bears mauling some kids is such a big deal with skeptics. I admit it is awful - the mindset that G_d isn't allow to judge people is incomprehesible to me.

There are many proven miracles. Go into any christian book shop and you will see books testifying to them.

What I am implying is that by forcing homosexuality into the 'norm', homosexuals have opened the door for a multitude of other abnormal behaviors, including pedophilia. And if you think it could never happen, it was accepted practice in greece for a LONG time. I'm sure you're proud to help out your NAMBLA brethren.

But I thought all 'atheists' were against capital punishment?

Well when I was not a theist I did pretty much whatever I wanted, ie sleep with as many women as I wanted etc. If I stopped believing in objective moral values I would definitely start doing that one again if I thought that any feeling of it being wrong was just an illusion. Just being honest.

[After posting the above]First, it is inappropriate for you to dismiss the [conservative] theologians I mention out of hand. You admittedly know nothing about them. I’ve debated quite a bit, but you have shown me a new tactic that I won’t forget (albeit a poor one): discrediting my sources out of hand while deifying your own sources.

I believe that witchcraft is real. Before I came to the Lord I practiced black magic, mind control and transcendental meditation... All of these powers are linked directly to demonic spirits. I had actual conversations with demons.

Hence, [St.] Augustine was able to believe, despite what scripture says, that God created all things instantaneously. Once a person goes that far in his 'interpretations' he might as well join Bishop Spong in that person's assertion that 'the only part of the Apostle's Creed I believe is that Jesus Christ died and was buried'. With Christian 'friends' like that who needs enemies?

God did not take the lives of the Egyptian firstborn unjustly and no one can argue that He didn't give them plenty of warning.

so what the fact is its not right people should not allowed to do things that are not right ....and they deffinetly should be able to feel pain if they get pregnant contraceptives should not be allowed...

fox news is fair and balance it supports both liberal and conservative viewpoints equally and it shows how liberal leaning other outlets are twilly spree you are supporting the death of thousand of children repent or suffer the dire consequences

This means that a person who believes we descended from apes or that all life came from a primitive protocell is inventing their own private version of Christianity which in a technical sense is not the Christianity of the Bible. This does not mean that their belief in Jesus Christ will not save them. It simply means that they are compromising with the world and in that sense could be said to not be genuine Christians.

i dont beleive in greek i beleive in english but there is no undisputed translation even the original greek is fought over so why should i spend more time... when you got hell for being homosexaul what will you do then...

...most evolutionists are too intellectually lazy and dishonest to represent their opponents correctly...

You didn't expect me to be 'sexist' and reply in a different manner to your silly attack because you're female (and likely blonde) did you? And under your evolutionary system, why not be sexist? Darwin and most of his evolutionary contemporaries were very sexist. Conversely, the Biblical Christianity is the only philosophy that has provided true liberation for women, but you come here to attack it.

One day an anti-creationist might surprise us all and actual respond to an actual argument instead of a straw man.

[After ancient Sumerian secular marriages are mentioned]if it were a ecenomic arragment it wouldnt be called marriage

God does not, nor will not use medication to heal fear, depression, hopelessness, or to bring peace, and your proclamation that He does only solidifies the fact that you believe in another God, and another Jesus.

mhm gay marriage is not a right marriage is a religious thing your yourself being a atheist should have no want for anything to do with marriage you being a atheist should know that homosexaulity makes those people not causing population so they should deserve no rights....

Gallup's 1991 poll showed that 95% of scientists (including non-biologists) accept evolution, with biologists above 99%.

You realize this is classic argumentum ad populum, don't you?

Christianity is growing rapidly in places like Asia and Africa. Atheism is irrational, illogical, incoherant and existentially self-destructive.

The gospels aren't good evidence of Jesus' life and death? Saying it doesn't make it so. Prove ithat the gospel accounts aren't historically reliable..

Because there is so much evidence for His existence (and also His Resurrection btw) that to question it is comparable to questioning the existence of JFK.

Whether some [old earth] creationists 200 years in the past came to the wrong conclusion about the age of the Earth has no bearing on the truth of the matter.

Are you going to argue that these people [the Apostles] DIED terrible deaths based on some second hand information that they couldn’t verify? Please.

I believe that witchcraft is real. Before I came to the Lord I practiced black magic, mind control and transcendental meditation... All of these powers are linked directly to demonic spirits. I had actual conversations with demons.