new

[From "British Judge Says Sex With Wife is a “Fundamental Human Right” and Everyone Loses Their Minds"]

The Jewish media puts sex everywhere to make people think about it constantly, but the Jews also make heterosexual sex much more difficult to achieve by introducing convoluted ideas about “consent” and about what marriage is supposed to be.

One man is taking a stand against that bullshit. This judge is bringing old ideas and common sense back into the discussion about the role of marriage in our society, and he’s doing all of that by… saying that a husband should be able to have sex with his wife.

RT wrote:

A British judge has invoked the ire of online commentators, activists and politicians after remarking that it was a man’s “fundamental human right” to have sex with his wife during an already controversial court case.
“I cannot think of any more obviously fundamental human right than the right of a man to have sex with his wife… I think he is entitled to have it properly argued,” senior High Court judge Justice Hayden was quoted as saying during a preliminary hearing on a case involving a married couple of 20 years.
The wife has learning difficulties and her condition is deteriorating, prompting social services to raise the alarm about the potential for sexual abuse in the relationship as they felt the woman was no longer able to make decisions about whether she consented to sexual relations. Social services ultimately brought the case to the Court of Protection in London.
The husband has pledged to no longer sleep with his wife but prosecuting lawyers are still pushing for a court order barring sexual relations to prevent the woman from being raped.

Let’s get something out of the way first: all women have learning difficulties. It’s just a matter of how severe those difficulties are.

That said, if she can say yes or no to a question such as “do you want some ice cream?” or “do you feel like watching a movie?” then she can absolutely consent to sex.

This whole “consent” thing is a retarded Jewish invention that overcomplicates basic male-female interaction. If a woman doesn’t want to have sex, she resists, if she wants to stop having sex while having sex, she makes it known. If she for some reason decides to pretend to be okay with having sex while not feeling like having sex, then that’s her problem. Literally something that happens in her mind that can’t be measured or proven.

The insanity of this story is augmented by the fact that even though the poor husband pledged to no longer sleep with his wife, prosecutors still push for a court order to officially make him unable to have sex with his wife.

Do you understand how insane that is?

If a man can’t have sex with his wife, why does he have a wife?

[...]

The idea about marriage that most people have in their subconscious was put there by tales of old, by their grandfathers, and by the Jewish social-engineering media machine.

If marriage doesn’t ask anything from women, and gives them half of your stuff or more whenever they please, it not only does nothing to stop relationships from breaking down but it actually provides incentives for relationships to break down.

These whores will destroy your life if you let them.

The moment they feel they’ve secured you, that you have no alternative front-hole, and that you’re socially and legally prohibited from looking for their replacement… that’s the moment they’ll decide to stop having sex with you. Sex will become less and less frequent. She’ll never be “in the mood,” she’ll always be tired or with headache. She’ll never treat you the same. She’ll look at you with disdain. She’ll resent you. She’ll feel trapped by you even though you’re the one that’s really trapped. She’ll feel you’re abusive even though she’s the one being abusive.

She’ll file for divorce and she’ll take as much from you as she possibly can, and then she’ll tell everyone you know about how terrible you are. She’ll go fuck some loser that can’t compare to you but that will have more than you because she’ll share the stuff she took from you with him, and they’ll laugh at you every time you go get your kids on the weekends.

Your kids won’t understand why daddy looks so poor now while mommy and her new boyfriend seem so well off. You’ll want to explain to them… but you won’t be able to. You wouldn’t even know where to start.

As time passes, you’ll see how your own kids prefer mommy’s boyfriend. They’ll tell you how funny he is, how many great things they do together, and how much time they spend together. Every time you send them back to her house… you’ll feel like a shadow. An empty human husk trapping the echoes of the man that you once were and mixing them with the cries of the man that you wanted to be.

All because you thought marriage meant something other than your doom.

(shockinghillaryquote)
Women are not smart, fun to talk to or dynamic.

I look at everything a woman says and I think, "Not a single thought of hers is original, but rather an amalgamation of what pop culture has taught her, filtered through her own construct of what she considers the 'self', but that, too, is a product of the pop culture."

They're so dumb, so lacking in anything good... other than T&A. Smart men have obviously realized you can "tap" into her hamster brain using PUA tactics, and though they have limits, they do work. The interesting thing about PUA, however, is the implication: that the woman's brain is this rote, predictable, pre-programmed biological unit that can be manipulated with words, smells, sights, strategies, all developed by the far more advanced male brain.

You begin to see the female for what she is, not a human, but this biological "thing" you work toward manipulating into bed, but moreso, into love (a state she can only momentarily occupy). She is a "thing" that has only one purpose: to weed out weak men and find strong men (yet her standards for "weak" and "strong" are largely fucked up, too, and even distorted by cultural norms, advertising or mores -- which, when gone awry, leads to cultural breakdown; the female is too stupid to make moral decisions on her own, without culture giving her direction ("Bad boys with tats are hot"), so a morally bankrupt culture will result in broken homes, which is what we have now. When men are no longer in control, such is the result).

Despite how lacking women are intellectually, men have to put in ALL the effort to cater to them, make them laugh, get them interested, play games (at least, by today's fucked up standards. Wasn't always quite this way, before feminism).

What a pain in the ass.

This is why we need advanced sex robots, because once developed enough, there will be ZERO reason to pursue real women.

(popinpan)
lmao i can't possibly imagine why a lovely individual like you is single. i wonder what you think lesbians do together? ??

(pussystabber)
There's no such thing as a true born lesbian, most dykes become carpet munchers after being severely abused by Chad's, the rest are just trying to be cool.

(popinpan)
And you know this how? There are roughly 3.5 billion women on the planet. It's estimated that 5-10% of those women are homosexual. Can you honestly tell me that you've met each and every one? Or, let me guess, the same group of people who are known for their limited experience with the opposite sex also happen to be experts of them?

That mindset is not only grossly exaggerated, it's also a complete lie. I was never attracted to men. Do you honestly believe I just date women because I was "severely abused by a Chad"?

(SlayorOfWhiteKnights)
True lesbianism makes no biological sense. Why would lesbians have evolved? Oh yeah, women kissing each other attracts Chads at parties (_)

(popinpan)
That's completely untrue. There are multiple biological factors that contribute to homosexuality in women, including hormonal imbalances, upbringing, and gender fluidity. I especially like how this Live Science article explains it:

Unlike men, who are usually sexually oriented solely toward men or women, and whose sexuality is essentially fixed from puberty on, a decade of research by the University of Utah psychologist Lisa Diamond and others demonstrates that women have greater "erotic plasticity." Their sexual orientation can be shaped by cultural influences, altered by positive or negative experiences and intensified by feelings of love or attachment.

Basically, sexual attraction in women can be heavily influenced by past interactions and experiences, and it has a tendency to be far more fluid than men's. I thought this was a pretty neat study, especially considering that so many guys here seem to assume all women are biologically obsessed with masculinity, or something.

Oh yeah, women kissing each other attracts Chads at parties

I don't even know where to begin. That's just fucking stupid.
___

(Faar2much)
I would say that your description is apt, but I am not hardcore enough to be able to label all women with such an elaborate and well thought out description. I can certainly see it being something conditioned into many privileged women, but let us be careful in breaking every single possible bridge between people of the different sex.

(incelwarrior9)
hw samrt can you be when you spend 90% of your time having fun? there is no space for them to devlip unique ideas so they just copy platitudes

(SlayorOfWhiteKnights)
Yup. They say adversity builds character. Since everything is handed to women on a silver platter, I doubt they can have much character built up.

(green----)
This is all true. Anyone who attempts to defend is some bitter shit personality women or a whiteknight duck.

Women are basically robots.