The woman-haters, man-haters, and non-binary-haters
(About D4vid's case)
> This nigger has done irreparable damage to age gap relationships especially among zoomers. Now even a 1 year age gap is going to be considered weird, toxic and chance of "manipulation"
> Women like guys 3-5 years older than them. That will never change. Ignore social norms.
> But muh agency
But muh strong independent young women taking advantage of daddy’s money and power
It’s not a real conversation
> These men are still of the mindset where they have to become gigachad to get the most access to women. Now you just have gymcels and angry misogynists keeping their defunct grift alive. Why? No other reason than that they're stupid as fuck and can't wrap their chimp minds around any other system. Doing so. Would make them confront the reality of what they actually are, neurotic parasites with no future, and the male mind simply isn't evolved enough to come to terms with that level of existential thought.
> It's actually evolved specifically for that. It is well known that men tend to be more narcissistic and more likely to overestimate their chances when it comes to virtually anything (at least initially, before the incel depression sets in). This is an adaptation stemming from male worthlessness - it was simply of no evolutionary benefit for the "cheaper" sex to practice self doubt or self preservation. Men are significantly more likely to harbor Dunning-Kruger delusions because of this - dying trying to shoot his shot and failing to reproduce are entirely equivalent outcomes to a male, so might as well shoot his shot. Conceptions lean male to compensate for the fact that men are pretty much designed to die by 30, but modern medicine is tampering with this process, thus promoting excessive and unnatural male survival (especially among geriatrics). Dysgenic, decayed perspectives that shouldn't exist thus become dominant narratives in society.
Nearly every facet of their warped psychology stems from two things: cuck anxiety and what inceloids call "male disposability". This is the reason why they'll delude themselves endlessly and externalize faults (example: ineffectual paypigging for male gurus, incel movements, terrorism) instead of genuine self improvement or therapy. You cannot fix a fault you are designed to be unable to confront in the first place. The delusion must keep going to fulfill a male's ultimate purpose (reproduction), and a man stops trying to reproduce, he might as well die or enter a "blackpilled" depressed state equivalent to death.
This is how I see it
Men desperately want to be so valuable that women desire them so much that they would move mountains to procreate with them.
They realize that the opposite is true, that women find them so disgusting they would instead move mountains not to procreate with them.
Men see this as the ultimate betrayal, and a complete rejection of their entire existence. He rectifies the situation by raping her instead, knowing full well she finds him and what he does to her revolting on a level comparable to death. A man raping a woman is punishment for her not raping him. He takes for himself a woman’s life force that he felt she was unfairly given and he was unfairly denied. He ruins/defiles/annihilates her to create justice out of her initial injustice (of simply existing as a woman)
If you understand how this works literally every psychosexual issue they have makes sense. This is how they can paint themselves as the victims of women’s sexualities, in that she unfairly owns the life force that he himself lacks and is helplessly required to pursue. How they can think this while knowing their presence is so horrible that every woman is ruined in the worst way imaginable through his contact, which escalates infinitely as his contact increases.
A male is a semi-self-aware parasite who hates that he depends on his host to thrive, knows she is ruined whenever he takes her blood and how she hates him for it, and enacts his revenge on the situation itself by stabbing her even more severely, even more frequently, in even more hosts that have blood left to be drained. It’s a very sick cycle and why misogyny escalates like a nuclear chain reaction, unlike any other form of hatred. There’s few to no racists who hate other races of men like they do women, how sadistically and compulsively they seek to punish and take from them both physically and psychologically.
They are raped by their own existence and wish women would rape them to save them, but because she won’t, he rapes the world.
Men know they are shit, which is why they talk and act the way they do. They are ironically much more easy to crack, so long as specific protective measures are taken to avoid taking damage from his inevitable melties when ego is under threat. Once they feel insulated from consequences, and once he realizes that there is absolutely nothing he can do to prevent or punish disclosure, he will readily open up. It’s cathartic to them to be vulnerable enough to discuss their “demons” and not face rejection for it. I do not recommend attempting it, since even without a candid confession, moids are not clever enough to obscure what they are, especially not when every other male in existence is doing their part to blow their cover in some way or another. They are extremely obvious to read if you have a modicum of pattern recognition and aren’t currently gaslighting yourself into refusing to read them.
The effort getting honesty out of any particular male is neither worth the investment nor the risk. When a man feels truly “vulnerable”, he will inevitably just admit his struggle to manage his excessive entitlement in a world that refuses to validate it, and his violent, rapey, pedophilic tendencies. We already knew all that, but the male still thinks his “demons” are special and absolutely must be concealed. The male is a safe with a turd inside located in a museum exhibit called “safes with turds inside”.
Moids are extremely fragile, intrasexually competitive, sexually neurotic, prone to externalization/externalizing their locus of control, transactional, and lack empathy (this last point cannot be overstated). This combination of traits, otherwise known as Normative Male Retardation, is the impetus of the “moid take”. “Moid takes” become the zeitgeist if and when moids are given the power force them into pseudo-existence. If he cannot effectively insist himself, he looks to the past for evidence, where men before him have once manifested his delusions. He invents or misconstrues doctrine (science and religion) for evidence. He cherry-picks fringe cases (often the result of previous male contrivance anyways) for evidence, or just convinces himself his own lies are as good as evidence, because if what he believed wasn’t true, why would he believe it? He will do anything and everything before he admits he must adapt, choosing instead at every turn to somehow manipulate reality itself to suit him instead. Even if it’s only in theory, he can only ever believe he is right. NMR is the reason. (...)
Their empathy deficit and neurosis are so high, they cannot accurately discern women’s incentives and conditions. He does not understand the world as an environment shared by actors with entirely different perspectives, approaches, goals, etc. Women are especially enigmatic, since they are so unalike him. He only understands reality where his thoughts are objective. His “objective” beliefs predictably clash with a subjective reality. Since he is deficient, his idea of reality is similarly deficient. This makes him fragile, and increasingly fragile the more dissonant his ideas and approach becomes. He lacks the ability to predict, plan, and adapt. The only way he can relieve his discomfort of living in a constant state of myopia is through aspiring towards absolute control.
For many men, yapping is the only remaining tool at his disposal to manipulate his surroundings, and he is primarily focused on getting women to comply. It’s very important to him, since ensuring reproduction is in second order to ensuring that his heart keeps beating. Actually, that’s debatable. I’m pretty sure males only keep their hearts beating because they might miss out on some insemination opportunities if they let it stop.
Why do incels think they're entitled to sex?
-----
> The government steals money from me at gunpoint to provide resources to women. It is this logical it should provide me vagina at gunpoint. The logical and inevitable end result of the state becoming every woman's husband, as it has, is the state becoming every man's wife too. if not we're going to have a dark age and Islam or some kind of novel white sharia equivalent will take over.
> Why do femoids think they deserve child support, welfare, other gibs and preferential treatment simply because they can open their legs, lay on their back and will always be able to find someone desperate enough to fuck them?
(@Vfrdk568639)
There's no real misandry nor hostility until men are afraid to leave their homes and go anywhere really. When that happens then they'll know what hostility actually means.
(@PlNKG0RE)
there need to be entire countries where marrying underage males is the norm, and cultures where cutting off their dicks but keeping balls is a tradition bc only one part is needed for reproduction. maybe that’ll give them smth real to whine about
Actually I think it would be a lot better if all men were shot on sight, then we rounded up all the boys and simply kept them as stud seed, so we could control reproduction so we never allow men to have any power ever again. That way we could end war, no more acid attacks, no more raping animals, no more gang rapes of children, no more Catholicism (a.k.a. raping little boys for fun then covering it up for your bros), no more genital mutilations, no more honor killings.
whenever I get a date - I am making her cry
this is how it's gonna go
whenever I get a date - I am making that bitch cry
I will insult her to her face. If she's fat. I''ll call her fat.
If she is not like her pictures, i'll call her on it.
If she is retarded I will call her retarded.
NO MATTER HOW PREETTY SHE IS OR HOW HORNY I AM
THIS IS THE TREATMENT THAT SHE WILL GET
THIS IS WHAT SHE DESERVES AND THIS IS WHAT SHE WILL GET
DON'T CARE IF SHE SUIS AFTTER IT
BECAUSE QUITE FRANKLY, NEITHER DID THE BITCHES THAT REJECTED ME
THEY DESTROYED MY SOUL AND NEVER SHOWED REMORSE
I OWE THEM NOTHING
There is no room in this child hating world for the child’s opinions and sexuality. Only the power of the moral arbiters.
In a post-Christian society, the revolution’s message is pleasure without limits, but unlimited debauchery has led to diminishing returns, a reminder that the hungry man appreciates food more than the glutton. <...>However, according to sexual revolutionaries, the fall of man began with Christianity, consequently humanity must return to a more civilised paganism; but although pre-Christian societies were highly sophisticated, so were their methods of torture and killing; their attitude to weakness was to trample on it.
The worship of sex is what Chesterton called a heresy — just one aspect of the truth, exaggerated to cover and control everything else — since although it is true that sex is natural and good, because created by God, when treated as the whole truth, it becomes a dangerous mania. Having children, the natural end of sex, can offer the unlimited joy of participating in God’s creation; but the only limit allowed by the revolution is family limitation.
<...>
Media reports about sex crime co-exist with pornographic imagery, although the two are seldom linked; however, the logical outcome of the Darwinian emphasis on Man as “just another animal”, coupled with “the right to sex”, is rape. The revolution implies that since sex is perfectly natural, there should be no barriers to it — except the barrier to that outcome which in the animal kingdom is the whole point of sex: procreation.
<...>
This Revolution has been portrayed as social evolution, but the revolutionaries may be going too far, too fast, exposing their masterplan as a “top-down” revolution aimed at controlling the population — literally, population control. Paradoxically, the endless quest for love is destroying the one who would offer unconditional love, if only allowed to live — the unborn child. But as the number of victims grows, and post-abortive women — and men — are “silent no more”, instead of “free love” we may hear calls for the need to free love, held hostage by false freedom.
Lower the Age of Consent to 11 !
- 11 is usually the age humans start being able to reproduce
- To help avoid criminalizing sex between two high school pupils
It is obvious that the age of consent is much too high in most of the world, The reasoning behind placing the age of consent at 16 is deeply flawed. After all who is likely to give a young person a good time? Someone well experienced or some fumbling kid? I think i know what I would prefer if i were a kid again.
If Spain can place the age of consent at 13, then why cant the rest of the world do the right thing and place it at 11
If you're a bi woman, go febfem. Only date women. I'm serious. In fact, unfollow me if you're het-partnered. If our dating choices will be interpreted politically no matter what, you might as well use it to send a loud, clear, message that those of us who have the apparent privilege of choice would NEVER choose the subhuman rape demon over the noble woman. Politics and appearances aside, why in the fuck would you date a man anyway???????
#kam2026#febfem#being bi is not a choice but who you date is#terf4terf#t4t stands for terf4terf#t4t
The male sexual revolution
The sexual revolution should have favoured men. After all, casual sex was now possible without the fear of getting the girl pregnant or having to marry her. Yet there was one thing screwed men over: Women don’t want casual sex as much as men want. Thus, the price of pussy remained as high as before while the price of cock went down to an all time low. Because of this we need a male sexual revolution break the female privileg.
To fix this there are two possibilities: Lower the price of pussy or increase the price of cock. I already talked about how we need to get rid of some fetishes in order to stop making women think they are entitled to Chad without bringing anything g to the table. How we have to talk about lowering the price of pussy.
The best way for this are sexbots. Why swipe through 30 bots on Tinder and then jump through some hoops when you can have an artificial pussy right at home? The effort/reward balance is way better for sexbots then for a hookup.
Of course prostitution is also a way but this has some serious downsides. Not only is it dangerous in terms of getting STD or being robbed, but it is also expensive. It is a band-aid for as long as it takes to get actual working sexbots.
It is not enough that they have destroyed homes, flooded countries with immigrants, corrupted the minds of fellow countrymen, devastated markets, poisoned food, compromised children's education, brainwashed women with toxic feminist propaganda, and infiltrated the political scene with corrupt actors to erode any hope for a better future. They are now attempting to destroy entertainment as well.
At some point, it becomes necessary to acknowledge that Jews are the embodiment of evil this world has ever known. They are sadists who derive pleasure from inflicting suffering upon others, not for any tangible benefit but merely because they enjoy causing pain.
They represent everything corrupt, including the gay community, trans activism, law enforcement, teachers, doctors, immigrants, politicians, and every single institution is designed to maximise your suffering, as Jews are fundamentally sadistic beings with no complex or deep motivations other than to inflict pain upon you for entertainment. This is why they engage in such actions – not for any sense of inclusion, but merely to cause distress. They are nothing more than a primitive subspecies, comparable to ignorant thugs.
However, these cowards rely on the system and the gullible masses to carry out their abuses, manipulating weak-willed individuals they brainwash, leading to atrocities such as COVID and BLM, taxes, and the education system, etc.
There is nothing left for us here, we should just stop using their jewish fiat currency and move onto other forms of trade.
Its time to stop letting them put a price on your labour and land, its a worthless jewish ponzi scheme and the culture they created is terrible.
Career Women Are Turned Aside After Satan
I detest a woman doing a man's job! Women cops often act like rugged men, having a Smart Alec attitude, talking tough with a manly voice, which I think is shameful. They lack femininity! I truly feel sorry for them for being “turned aside after Satan” (1st Timothy 5:14-15). A women's place is in the home, married, bearing children, guiding the home (baking pastries, preparing home-cooked meals and fulfilling her God-given role as a wife and mother). The whole idea of career women is straight out of the depths of Hell! The Devil and his children hate the traditional family. God bless the woman who works hard at home as a mother and a wife. You are the best!!!
When Christian women wear pants, it discourages men who are trying to live a holy life, and it says that THOSE WOMEN ARE SELFISH AND DON'T CARE ABOUT HURTING OTHERS, and that their walk with God at SHALLOW (or non-existent). It also tells me that their pastor (and associate pastors) aren't preaching against the sin of women wearing pants! I saw a woman in tight black leather pants, on staff at Harvest Baptist Church on Guam. And yet they laugh at and mock me. Their senior pastor in 2014 called me “old school,” because I believe women ought not wear pants. No, he is fool school! “Fool school” is Bob Jones University, where your faith will be shaken in the inspired words of God and you'll be! BJU is as worldly as can be in their female clothing standards! You see, Bob Jones University wants to fit in with the heathen world, appearing “normal” to an abnormal world that has forsaken the holy God of the Bible. No doubt many woman like to wear tights, pants, slacks and other unladylike forms of clothing because they are convenient and comfortable, but I again remind you that someone is always watching ladies. I have noticed that 99% of professed Christian women are no better than singer Taylor Swift, who wears a dress one day, and a mini-skirt the next! You are only as virtuous and modest as your LEAST virtuous and LEAST modest day of the year!!! Taylor Swift is a female devil on two legs, a degenerate piece of filth who ought to be locked in prison for her crimes against children!
A baby plays with its rattle too hard and it breaks. The baby screams in anger and frustration that it broke its own favorite toy, and discards it in a rage.
This is the entirety of the male experience.
Ruin the land, and wage war to steal more unruined land to ruin. Rape and abuse your women, then kill or abandon them once you're satisfied that they've been broken in your eyes. Make money to waste money so you can fantasize about getting more money.
All male contributions to philosophy and religion have been attempts to cope about the fact that men, being parasites at a biological level, fundamentally are opposed to resource stewardship. It's not just that they suck at it. It's that their parasite mind actively encourages them to get off on seeing resources wasted abundantly.
#xy is a chromosomal defect#kam2026#i hate men#radical feminists do interact#radblr#men are parasites
(Enigmatic93)
Guys that fuck landwhales and old ladies are part of the problem
I don't blame guys on here for one second for rejecting obese women and 40+ year old hags. At least they're not contributing to hypergamy. When a normal looking healthy guy gets desperate and fucks a morbidly obese hamplanet or fucks a grandma they make it harder for the the guys on the level of the aformentioned hamplanets and old hags because now these horribly low sex appeal cunts think they can do better, which means that guys that are truly bottom of the barrel can't aim any lower.
(DavidGolani11)
This much is true, there should be no reward for uncontrolled eating
(chudur-budur)
Part of the problem or the main cause of the problem?
(Bloodrot)
I agree 100%
The reason even fat ugly cunts aren't into me is because a Chad came by and fucked them and now those girls feel like they're entitled to a Chad
Fuck those Chads. They're the main protractor of this global issue we're now facing.
(Enigmatic93)
Yup. If you approach a chick with seemingly low value and she rejects you, it's very likely she had a guy better looking than you before.
(TheMubarak1)
I blame the male sex drive. Men will fuck anything even other men. Female sex drive is a joke comparing to male's.
(chudur-budur)
men fuck everything that moves, and this is a fact.
(BasedTruecel2)
Not true. The "virtually non-existent female sex drive" is a meme and needs to stop. I recall a study somewhere that more females watch porn than men, but unfortunately, I can't find it. Even if that isn't true, a lot of females still watch porn and have as much of a sex drive as men do.)
(TheMubarak1)
It's not a meme otherwise chads will be gang raped by women in a high rate. No one said they don't have sex drive but it less than men's. Or there won't be any male incels since you will guarantee a fuck from a woman desperate for a cock. Which is not the case. I got hit by gays twice and never once by woman. So yeah I wish it's a meme but nah.
(Gibitto)
I guess they have the same or more, but they can relieve it easier, when they start to get horny, they just open tinder and have some sex, just like that.
Having a daughter is the worst thing that can happen to a man
Just imagine it, you feed and nurture this fucking thing with a hole for years just so it can grow up and become a cum dumpster for Chads and normies. You feed your baby girl, teach her how to walk, talk, she goes to expensive schools... and then she hits puberty, goes to high school and college and she randomly swallows gallons of cum at parties and thinks she is smart and strong and emancipated for doing it.
Only thing worse than that is having multiple daughters. Females are worthless scum, you nurture them just so they can betray you and whore themselves out. If you have a daughter you are raising a play toy for Chad and normie-scum. There's really no decency in it whatsoever, even if she is a straight-a student she is still a fucking degraded whore who would let Chad shit in her mouth just for validation.
"I want to be pure forever..."
W*man hate when you explicitly draw attention to the fact that at least 90%+ of modern w*men have acted with unconscionable deficient morality in their s*xual lives (dating for financial exploitation, dating multiple men at once, dating with no loyalty/allegiance, benefiting from "women are wonderful effect"/"halo effect" to harm innocent/naive men). The reason words like "whore" and "slut" are so cutting and provoke a sudden uncontainable emotional outburst is because you are communicating to her, "I'm on to you, I know your true nature, I am not a simple man and will not overlook your moral defect. I will call you out for the immoral person you have chosen to become and continue to be."
There is NOTHING wrong with calling a woman a "WHORE" or a "SLUT". It is the community/societal policing that was once universally practiced and respected in the Western world. We bought into the lie it was an oppressive and repressive system of control of w*man's bodies and minds but it was not. The oppression of rampant s*xual degeneracy, promiscuity, family-fracturedness, polyamory, romantic rejection and isolation at the hands of acceleration of hypergamy is far more oppressive. Oppression by order is controlled chaos. Oppression by disorder is uncontrolled chaos.
You stole your own purity. You chose to not be pure forever. I simply hold a mirror up to your life.
Porn will never be free speech.
Porn is imagery. Porn is media. Porn consists of videos and photos.
Those are visuals. Not speech or text.
And even the actual text/speech in porn is riddled with slurs (bitch, cunt, whore, slut, etc) and degrading language. You know, speech that shouldn't be normalized or accepted.
If we've come to shun racial slurs, the same should be done for misogynistic slurs.
But anyways - pathetic porn apologists who scream that porn is a "right" and a "freedom" and part of "free speech" are deluded and partaking in a massive cop-out. It's a right for whom? It's a freedom for whom? It's free speech... For WHOM?
For men. Because it certainly isn't any of those things for women.
I can just hear the pro "sex work" libfems in the back of my mind going "nuh-uh! It's freedom for women too, since we want the autonomy to show off and make bank off our bodies!"
...yea, ok. All I hear is "I'm brainwashed and I believe freedom for women means being able to choose to exploit, commodify, and objectify myself within an inherently misogynistic industry and have that be widely accepted and even applauded".
Convenient, isn't it, that freedom for women to these people means being as vulnerable, exposed, obliging, and subjugated as possible - yet freedom for men means, you know... Actual freedom. Actual power. None of this bullshit.
If freeing slaves, for example, wasn't an attack on free speech or anyone's "rights", neither is freeing women from porn and the sex industry. Both things directly treat humans in ways that no human should be treated.
Ridding the world of the sex industry and how it harms and enslaves women, whether by actual force or via mass brainwashing and manipulation, is not and will never be a bad thing.
Porn is not freedom of speech or expression, nor is it a "right". Porn is the exploitation, commodification, and dehumanization of real human beings - namely women - and nobody reserves the "right" to partake in such a thing or derive pleasure from it.
> Tesla was based, he knew men were worse than women and women were superior. Towards the end of his life he thought society ran by women would be much better
> He got very close to reaching the final stage of male exclusive existential grief in accepting his true position in the world. A man capable of just peering into that void is going to also have the intelligence, ingenuity, and introspection to do other genius things. The moid struggle is both horrific to experience as well as entertaining to observe. I both like and dislike Tesla and men like him. I wish we could just put them all into a zoo and observe them like animals.
I hate when men use “theory of mind”, it only ever demonstrates how they themselves lack theory of mind. Not agreeing with or tolerating someone’s behaviors doesn’t mean you are completely oblivious to what, how, and why they behave the way they do. Criminal psychologists for example can develop a very accurate model for the minds of murderers, and the fact that they aren’t condoning and enabling murdering doesn’t mean they’re bad at their job.
It’s the same moid logic that has them parading around their “toxic empathy” talking point. They just lack a robust sense of self and have no principles, and believe if you understand someone/something that means you have to comply and obey. No wonder they’re so submissive and love hierarchies. If someone tells them what to do they’ll do it, so their only defense they have is refusing to listen. Then when women don’t fall in line with what they want, they just project and say she lacks the willingness or capacity to listen.
If he’s right he should be damn thankful. Women projecting a greater level of humanity on moids than they actually possess benefits moids infinitely more than not. Little disruptive Timmy getting his feeling hurt after reprimanded because his teacher “expects better of him” is the same type of woman who thinks she can bring her abusive husband to the light if she just could just coax it out of him. Go ahead and take away women’s grace by forcing them to accept male primitive nature. Timmy will be happy when you stop trying to force him to read and let him snack other boys with sticks, until he grows up and can’t find a replacement mommy to take care of his violent, illiterate ass.
RE: [News] Eight low SMV men were arrested for raping a 16-year-old foid...and taping it and uploading the video onto Facebook
The sharing of the video on Facebook suggests the perpetrators were “proud of what they had done and wanted to display this for others to see — and that in itself is disturbing,” said Vanessa Volz. “It’s obviously horrific and completely unacceptable and I think very indicative of how we still are living in a rape culture,” Ms. Volz said.
maybe if women didn't use sexual appeal as a metric of men's worth & routinely shame men for being sexually unsuccessful, that wouldn't be the case. just a thought
Thank you mothers.
Thank you so much for bringing males into this world, who will become teenagers and men and who will be absolute tyrants by harrassing others with their noise and smell, who litter and cause so much dirt, who will think they have the right to scream and groan around and be loud as fuck, who will sexually harass girls and women, who will be misogynists and loudly play misogynistic songs, who will scream and loudly play porn during the night (thanks for giving them smartphones in the first place), who will be smart enough to act nice around you mothers and like assholes once you're not around, who will make everyday life hell for girls and women.
Great fucking job, mothers! Thanks. So. Fucking. Much. You. Fucking. Whores.
Thanks to you the world is this fucked up place, after all you create and socialize these vile creatures. You create evil and you're even proud of it.
Equality as its described by the majority is a big contradiction of terms or at the very best a bad name for this ideology. But when it comes to terms, here’s what’s going on.
In order for equality to exist in our society, there has to be equivalence. The easiest example is a balance. Put a sack with 100 grams of sand in it in one side and the weight pulls it down. This is a case where one side weighs 100 grams and the other 0. Clear?
If I put another 100 grams on the other side, we have equivalence and therefore the balance is even.
The first is a case where there is not equivalence, because one side is heavier than the other.
Now, imagine two workers who are exactly the same (they even have the same salary) except for one thing: one is male and the other is female. This is a place where there isn’t equivalence, and thus there is no equality. Why? Because in order to have equality you need both workers to be male or female because inside the conditions of equality women cannot be paid or hold the same jobs than men. Men and women are different mostly (in my honest opinion, only) physically, but the point is that one difference it’s more than enough to be different.
This method is bound to fail because finding two people in the world who are identical is impossible and this ideology thinks of humanity as a bunch of clones. Regardless of what the popular believe is, we are not all equal or the same. Some people are better than others and the reasons for that are many. This is why an ideology based on unrealistic terms is flawed and useless.
To me it’s a waste because the female worker is smaller and weaker (don’t like it? Blame nature) but that’s not always the best traits for all jobs and it’s better to go for individuality where the female worker, in a much more realistic way, could have a lot of good traits to compensate for the bad ones or the male worker could be absolutely useless.
I think that people should be evaluated individually by their own positive and negative traits and I think we should aspire to become better by compensating our flaws with a lot of talents or whatever. Stop it with the equality bullshit because that’s not what we need. Equality pulls ignorant, pathetic or useless people up to the same level of respected, intelligent and knowledgeable people and pulls the other ones down.
> Does personality really matter? Or is that a meme?
All men ruin your life on different levels, ranging from murder to mild daily annoyances. If by personality you mean minimising the negative consequences of a relationship, then yes it matters. However I could not give less of a shit about a man’s hobbies or “sense of humour” or favourite media or political views or life philosophy. All I want is a harmless hot guy. He could be in a vegetative state for all I care. You make FRIENDS based on personality. A husband is not a friend
imposing themselves on others must truly be males’ only way of life bc why is “leave her the fuck alone” never an option in their walnut sized rapechimp brains
a severely underraped demographic, may god bless us with more men like rey sinaga to even out the stats so i don’t have to see this braindead drivel getting up to hundred thousands likes every other week, amen
Nope, totally helpless is good. Men say “I love you”, women say “I need you”.
“Take some deep breaths and walk around for a while, then please try to explain why you are so upset by women using tools around the home.”
You want my personal motivation? Buckle up. I live in a society where women are so safe and provided for, they have zero need for unsexy men like me. Guess what? If Barbie doesn’t need me then she doesn’t want me. She marries Welfare and rides the carousel until the Wall hits and leaves her a burned-out waste of a human soul, while I starve for sex and get treated by society like a drone.
I lose. She loses. My country burns.
Does it bother you that I want to spook women into good behavior? To push their faces in the facts of how much that fish needs a bicycle? To sabotage their ability to survive without a man around? I want to do it because it works. The Democrats have been scaring women into obedience for decades with great success. Even Christ did no less when He repeatedly warned us of Hell. Women are creatures of fear. Fear motivates women in healthy directions. Taking away her fear is like taking away a man’s courage. The result is loathsome, unmotivated androgyny.
I live in Androgyny, USA. The men are allowed little chance to strive & succeed, or even trade friendly punches, eventually slouching into parodies of masculinity such as lumbersexuals. The women fear nothing and therefore stop exerting themselves, inflating like pool toys, their minds devolving to a level of stimulus-response that would shame a worm. How did we get here? Safety first! Barbie must always be safe!
Either we frighten women into marrying early and young, ripping away every “I don’t need no man” crutch possible, and in the process giving men the chance to be heroes, or the West will continue its decline into a matriarchal slum of men checked out on video games and women checked out on social media. Neither wanting to live in this Brave New World of safe spaces.
That’s why I don’t want Barbie to feel safe, to be competent in my absence. She is a woman and therefore, the price of respecting a Beta like me is living in a constant state of mild fear to which I am the answer. So be it. I will be her hero and she will be my cheerleader with benefits. I can rent domestic servants. I can’t rent admiration and respect.
That is Christ’s own attitude, right there. He doesn’t want us because we’re useful. He wants us because we’re grateful.
Thank you, that needed saying.
[Title: Measures across the country aim to restrict what children can read. - Context: moral panic in the US, banning books in schools, non-expert prejudice-based supervision, enabled with new controversial laws]
In one Virginia school district this fall, parents will receive an email notification every time their child checks out a book. In a Florida school system, teachers are purging their classrooms of texts that mention racism, sexism, gender identity or oppression. And a Pennsylvania school district is convening a panel of adults to sign off on every title that school librarians propose buying. The start of the 2022-2023 school year will usher in a new era of education in some parts of America -- one in which school librarians have less freedom to choose books and schoolchildren less ability to read books they find intriguing, experts say.
[...]
"This is a state-sponsored purging of ideas and identities that has no precedent in the United States of America," said John Chrastka, EveryLibrary's executive director. "We're witnessing the silencing of stories and the suppressing of information [that will make] the next generation less able to function in society."
[...]
Meanwhile, a flurry of parent-staffed websites reviewing books for inappropriate content have appeared -- including "Between the Book Covers," whose website says "professional review sites cannot be entrusted," and BookLook.info, a place for taking a closer look at the books in our children's hands." (Virginia's Bedford County district now suggests the latter as a resource for parents.) There are also Facebook groups like Utah's "LaVerna in the Library," which "collects naughty children's books."
[...]
BookLooks ratings range from 0, "For Everyone," to 5: "Aberrant Content" for "Adult only." A BookLooks review of Nobel Prize winner Toni Morrison's novel "The Bluest Eye," often taught at the high school level, labeled it a "4" -- meaning it should not be read by anyone under 18.
[...]
In other places, book purges are proceeding quietly -- sometimes by unwilling hands.
[...]
That warm smile on a man’s face, the one he has when he first meets a woman for a date, belies his true intentions: RAPE. I know, because it happened to me. Back when I was a 170 pound twig I went to the movies with a boy from high school. He was tall, thin, and handsome — a nice homely boy, or so I thought. But I was never the same again after he took advantage of me. From that point on I discovered the true evil that lurks within all men.
Let me tell you sisters, all men are disgusting animals, PIGS! Every time a man sees a woman, he undresses her in his mind, and that is the first offense. It’s the precursor to rape; he is premeditating rape. Even if he doesn’t go through with it, he has the mind of a rapist. It’s no different from a man pointing a gun at you. He shows intent even if he fails to pull the trigger. Don’t be fooled.
When I was date raped, I was just sitting next to this— what I thought was a man, this monster. I was sharing a bucket of popcorn with him when all of the sudden I felt his dick in the bucket. Then he grabbed me and tried to force himself on top me. From that day on I told myself I’d never, ever, ever let that happen to me AGAIN!
I gained a few pounds since then to ward off creeps and their creepy stares; and surprisingly it hasn’t hurt my sex life too much — I’m still a hot sex goddess, I just appeal to men of a different skin tone. And if a man dares to touch me, I can turn around and shove him to the ground and sit on his face!
Call it reverse rape if you want, I call it justice.
I remember my old English teacher telling us that modern makeup is the only reason why the relatively recent phenomenon of females marrying outside of their teenage years is possible.
It is sort of interesting how primal the fear of misogyny is in all our brains. I claim to be misogynist, but am I really? Is misogyny hating women for any reason at all? Is it hating what women do or what they believe or what they represent or something else? The only reason I claim to be one is an exercise in psychological liberation. I do believe that it is okay to have negative feelings about women. I think a lot of men will never advance beyond a certain stage of personal development because there is a whole range of emotions and ideas they're so deathly afraid of that they'll forever suffer from the emotional repression. It's like attempting to thought police your own mind.
[From “Syssitia”]
The Priests of the Sacred Words are a monastic order of men who have transvalued Christian values ??to the values of Greco-Roman times
Unlike Christian monks, all of our our priests are married
Male children are raised by the women until the age of six or seven; after that, their upbringing is entirely the responsibility of the father
No one thinks males who identify as trans “girls” are female, they treat them as males, special and worthy of attention, no one treats female children as special. We are raised to be polite and to center males, I certainly don’t see TIMs being raised to cater to other males, they will certainly be raised expecting girls and women to pander to them, sorry not sorry, we don’t worship in the transcult.
[RageFuel] Homosexuality is being forced on us.
Has anyone here ever wondered why all gay men are low tire ugly looking betas? Foids (especially feminists) are promoting homosexuality on a large scale.
Their goal is to brain wash every single one of us betas into believing that we are gay so we end up fucking each other and won't even look at foids in the future, leave alone asking them for sex.
They start implanting these ideas in our heads as soon as puberty hits us. Most Chads I've know had their first girlfriend as early as 12 or 13. Chads are exposed to female sexuality at an early age and by doing so they are being trained to impregnate thousands of foids in the future. Whereas we are deprived of female sexuality and constantly being told by foids that homosexuality is just as normal as heterosexuality. They force these ideas on us so much that at some point we are compelled to question our own sexuality.
After 50 years it'd be illegal for betas to even think about foids. We'd be forced to fuck other men whilst the 10% of the Chads would be fucking and impregnating 100% of foids. Male on rape would be decriminalized and every single beta would be so much sexually frustrated that he'd gladly agree to fuck another guy. Chads would be out there fucking thousands of women and we'd be jerking off to gay porn.
Foids hate betas, they'd go to any length to keep us away from them even if it takes to force homosexuality on us.
In reply to a LONG running thread about homosexuality this one said this.........
"To me it is also gender-related. Example: female homosexuality is way more natural than homosexualuality in men, and my argument is this... men do not breast feed their sons, but mothers (most) breastfeed their daughters. Now this may seem like a strange argument, but just think about it. The act of breastfeeding is not NECESSARILY a sexual experience or expression, but there is a stimulation of the errogenous zones of the baby's mouth and the mother's nipples during breastfeeding."
Lots of women only really have a pussy to bring to the table.
Think about it: you're friends with a woman. Even if she's cool you can't treat her as one of the boys or society will grill you.
So you're left with "less than a male" friend.
A guy is almost always better off having a good male friend vs a good female friend.
A woman is ALSO almost always better off with a good male friend than a good female friend.
Sensible mammals keep males separated from the females and their babies. (Elk, big cats, etc). The females and their babies are the CENTER of the culture. Females and males negotiate a couple weeks a year, and the rest of the time, dude mammals get banished to the brush, where they are vulnerable to predation, easily dispensed with and not missed. But humandudes been working this-here-thing long time now. They got it just how they like it. Insanely: Dudes have made dudes the CENTER of the culture. (Even where people are culturally tight-knit, and/or “egalitarian,” eg, Cuba, — males retain THE CENTER). Females and their babies are cast to the periphery, which is often considered “private” (owned, cloaked in silence). They are isolated, usually separated from each other, under house arrest in some cultures, and, unless they are single mothers, are managed one-on-one by a dude. That now some dudes change diapers once in a while in No Way Changes the Dudes at the Center of the Culture/Females and Babies Banished to the Brush set-up here. Whether it’s public housing or private vaults in the city, suburbs or country – females and their babies have been pushed from the CENTER to the outside…
Males as the CENTER – this wacky shit is maintained by inanities such as “Men Do Important Things,” “It’s a Man’s World,” etc. — All Male Reversals. Males are NOT the CENTER (of anything). Males are biologically and in all other ways peripheral. Among mammals, females and their babies, should females chose to have babies, are in and of themselves the CENTER. (How long were males loitering in the brush with hardons, having nothing to do but pick their earwax with a twig, not liking this situation at all, before figuring out how to rig it for the Y? (When a male courts a female, he restores her to her place at the CENTER. But like all cons, it’s a temporary means to an end, ie, winning female self-betrayal)).
Is Doctor Who pandering to SJWs?
The answer is obviously yes, unless you think it’s by chance that in the past season as the SJW’s rose, suddenly Jesus was black, all of history is whitewashed, the doctor will be becoming a woman, and the sidekick is a black lesbian. All they need is an Asian and they’ve ticked all the boxes - and you guessed it, next season will also have an Asian. And it’ll go like this - the women will be in charge, they’ll be brave, intelligent etc., and the men will be complete wimps, stammering about hardly able to put a sentence together. Apparently this is ‘progressive’, despite the fact to anybody with a brain, it’s regressive.
Given most people are indoctrinated, they probably see this as normal. Regardless, whether you like the pandering or not, the show has lost it’s magic. Tbh I wouldn’t say SJW’s ruined it, even before the pandering, after Matt Smith’s departure, the show’s just…..boring. Far too iterative, they need better writers - but finding good writers is hard when SJW’s will lynch anyone that even slightly deviates from their agenda. But, I don’t know why they can’t find good writers, could be a number of reasons.
Parthenogenesis exists within all organism classes, with the exception, presently, of mammals. (Watch for Trust Your Perception’s future post:“Parthenogenesis: A-How-To-Guide).” Parthenogenesis seems miraculous to dudes, but only if, Supermagiklike, God micro-manages the whole thing top-down, — which, – why would he? It’s parthenogenesis. GOD, according to Y-Relay4Dummies, is placed ABOVE the auto-generating female, — clarifying that All Reproduction, — even parthenogenesis, — should it occur, — is Dude-Directed. The truth is dude directs nothing. Dude is not “The Decision-Maker.” Dude is a decaying parasite at the casino. An opportunist with semi-functioning-gunk, he half-assed dispatches SRY to intercept for dudebaby, hoping chance forces his blueprint onto some female willing to spend the next 21+ years of her life in babydude-devotion. (Jennifer Graves has even suggested SRY may not be an “activator,” but a suppressor. In other words, SRY may turn OFF a testis-making inhibitor, which means something is trying to inhibit testis-making, which wouldn’t be dudes. Dudes love testis. (Plus, — slapping an extra gene DAX1 on the X chromosome overrules SRY – turns a going-male fetus back female (ie, SRY is not the final word on sudden aberrant embryo shift)). Even male geneticists who show themselves advanced beyond their peers enough to receive the precious-rare Radfem Honorable Mention — (Thank You Bryan Sykes) — refer to SRY as the “Master Switch.” The Y, who never talks to anyone and lives in his basement, where he apparently amuses himself with Delusions of Grandeur, isn’t pulling a “Master Switch.” He is yanking the string tied to the cheap ball-metal-chain from the lightbulb in his dank-packrat-basement where he is yearning for a replica. Reproduction – CREATION — as Dude-Directed – whether by God or SRY – are Delusions of Grandeur on a scale no meds can fix.
Clearly, these some Magic Powers. But NOT DUDE’S. The Godstory is a Male Reversal: Any male – God-Thundering Fictional Prick to day-dreaming basement-dweller, — claiming the Generative Power and potentially Self-Generative Power native to females as his own has sucked in too many moldspores. Men are not Omnipotent Creators. On the contrary…
My biggest regret in life is loving women.
Romantic love is a delusion mostly based on our powerful sexual and emotional instincts.
Most people, men or women, are not that lovable.
Carl Jung said that if you take away God, people worship false Gods (i.e. sex and romance.)
(((Hollywood Movies))) program us to seek romantic love above all else. Romantic love is an ersatz religion to teach us to seek ourselves in another person instead of in Self-development.
They taught us that sex is a "mystical experience," the best life offers. "Sexual intercourse is a sacrament.
Orgasm is union with the universe."
The quest for our "soul mate" or "other half" leads to arrested development. God is our soul mate.
The tendency to idealize other people is a mistaken quest for the God within. This mistake ("transference") often leads to disaster.
The spark of Divinity in our soul is the principle of our self-development. Be your own God. Worship your Best Self.
<...>
I wish I hadn't loved them. Looking back, none were worth it. I have wasted half my life.
The satanist media has given young women a delusional sense of entitlement. Our mental programmers present them as demi-gods.
Just like prostitutes, many young women are no longer attractive to men. Men find modesty, innocence, style, intelligence, and femininity attractive.
Moreover, I sense that fewer and fewer women are even capable of loving a man. Their hearts have been poisoned by satanist social engineering. (Of course, men share the blame by treating women as sexual urinals.)
<...>
Am I bitter? Yes. I am bitter for all the ways my culture has lied to me. Here, I blame Illuminist brainwashing that elevates sexual "relationships" to the negation of everything else. And I blame myself for falling for this garbage.
But we cannot let this biological and social programming ruin our lives. Many men are ruined by divorce. Many women are gold diggers.
Perhaps the real takeaway is this: Don't look for someone to believe in you.
According to the Christian Godstory, God forces a woman into pregnancy. But he’s not rapey just any-ole-way… Thoughtful, he sends a Pregnancy Alert by Angel, — before kidnapping the woman’s uterus and making it make a babyboy (in his own image). (The male messaging the female about her impending zygote is some loco shit; whether dude gets the news is at the female’s discretion).
Usetabe, Trust Your Perceptions saw this boring-ass story as maybe the main propaganda dudes used to normalize patriarchy and patrilineal descent. But the story takes on new meaning when looking down a microscope at dude’s Y. Holy Book needs a subtitle, like, The Bible: The Y-Survival Manual. Or sell more titles with: Y-Relay4Dummies.
Simple steps for simpletons. Step 1: Parasites, Behold! Kidnap-ye a vag-uterus-contraption. Step 2: Make ye A SON! Step 2 is indeed a big fucking deal, cuz if Pappadude “makes” a daughter, his Y is dead in the Nile. The Y functions like a clone and needs a SON to survive. Dudeson IS THE SAVIOR – for Y.
The female is given clear instructions on her role in the Y-chromosome-operation: Shut up and make it. We mean: You get to be the Mother of God! Y-Relay4Dummies talks about women as incubators, because to the Y, that’s what females ARE. (Sperm had to overcome a lot to get next to the Almighty Egg. (Watch for Trust Your Perception’s future post:“Chemical Warfare Between the Sexes, or the Many Ways Females Have Tried, From Under Their Skin, to X-out the Y).” The first conscious effort by the incubator to Y-flush — frightened Ys and the females they’ve hoodwinked and bamboozled aren’t standing for this. (Have you seen Y-Relay4Dummies-Thumpers over in India and China putting a stop to the mass-flushing of female fetuses? Have they even mentioned that shit?) The effort to economically and legally force women to pregnate has been called by fighter-writer Jacqueline S. Homan “forced organ donation.” For precarious parasites, not just politically, but biologically, “forced organ donation” is required, and is clearly prototyped for females in Y-Relay4Dummies). Female as incubator is a Male Reversal. Women don’t exist as empty vessels for men; in species-reality, men exist as vessels of sperm for women, who are responsible for managing the species — as they see fit.
@Graham Platner for Senate
Susan Collins wants to make it harder to vote.
She just bailed out Trump and cosponsored the "SAVE Act.” Under this terrible bill, if you get married and change your name, or if you can't find your passport — you could be turned away from the polls.
You are a cuck of the highest (meaning, lowest) order.
The only difference between you and a liberal woman is, she has bigger balls than you.
It's probably because songs about love are so shallow and meaningless. I've realized that love is just some neurochemicals meant to encourage reproduction, and love is just a product of evolution. The people singing these songs are so delusional, while I'm the only one who actually knows what love really is. This makes me feel isolated and strange, making me feel a sense of dread.
I've mentioned how songs about love are shallow and meaningless. This shows that love (which is supposed to be a peak human experence) is just a biochemical reaction, and that humans are mortal beings, meaning that I'll eventually die, and that makes me scared.
Learning about the blackpill has made me lose attraction in females. I've realized that lust is just a primal desire, and females take advantage of that. I'll never be able to get a woman anyways, so what's the point in lust? As a result, my lust has been reduced.
Can any of you relate?
You cannot tell me virginity doesn't matter when Chad brags about deflowering
If virginity doesn't matter, then why does Chad feel so happy about deflowering as many as possible?
Why do they brag about it to me? Even Chad feels that it's special when he takes a girls virginity.
If this is such a toxic view of sex, why doesn't it stop Chad?
[From "Incels are national heros for not raping the bitches who reject them"]
Twitch has changed it's terms to no longer let people use "incel" as an insult.
It's ridiculous Big Tech censorship, of course. But there was always something interesting about people who insulted people by calling them an "incel".
"Incel" as an insult basically means "you should go rape instead".
The term "incel" of course means "involuntary celibate". The person isn't having sex not through a personal choice, but because he (and let's be honest, it's almost always a he) can't find a willing (female) partner.
So then somebody on the internet calling an incel an incel as an insult (say that three times fast) is essentially telling him that he should stop being an incel. He would do this by, presumably, having sex with a woman.
However "having sex with a woman" is what the incel has been trying to do. But no women want to do it with him. So the command "go have sex" is essentially "go rape a chick".
Like all Big Tech censors, Twitch shouldn't be in the business of restricting any words: from "incel" to "nigger" everything should be permitted, but it's also one that the pansy leftists who use the term probably should have shied away from in the first place.
Feminism is a crock of shit.
It was deliberately designed to destroy the human family structure.
<...>
Feminism was created because the purchasing power of the Federal Reserve Note, aka the US ‘dollar’, was dropping so rapidly in the 1950s. The Powers That Be decided since the dollar was so weak that an ordinary man’s paycheck could no longer support a family, it was necessary to force women into the industrial side of humanity.
To do that, they had to change the basic concepts within women’s minds.
Feminism was thus created. It came from Talmudic thinking, and was led by deeply zionistic women. Go look up the early history of Feminism...all Talmudic jew women. They were running their own agenda seeking zionist control over humanity.
Feminism has proven itself to be a disaster. This is due to biology. No amount of Talmudic muddy thinking and plots will overcome basic human biology.
<...>
To survive a ‘working life’ a body relies on testosterone. To endure the grinding pressures of the industrial side of humanity both physically and mentally takes much more than ideology.
<...>
In the 1950s the degradation of the purchasing power of the dollar caused global reorganization. There were economic depressions NOT much discussed in USA and flowing around the world beginning in 1953 (note just following the UFO fly-overs of the White House and Washington DC). Also in the mid 1950s we get the first wedges of ‘feminist thinking’ emerging.
<...>
Trump is changing that. Yes. Trump will save all the liberal purple haired crazy septum-pierced women! And their victims, including the beta males.
He’s doing it by way of a return to sound money. It’s necessary as the BRICs nations are moving into sound money, and a debt based currency (aka “the dollar”) cannot compete with sound money.
Mostly readers, both male and female, will say WTF?
Go ahead. Wonder. Laugh even. But you will see, Trump’s move to Sound Money will rescue us all.
Welcome to SciFi World. Welcome to the Golden Age.
How cruel is it that attractive men get all the women while everyone else gets none
Sometimes, I want to punch a wall then go and find the nearest foid and shoot her in the dome everytime they complain about how all men cheat
All men cheat, and have six girlfriends at once, because they only go for these men. They only go for men who ALREADY have plenty of other girlfriends. Ie the rich get richer, the poor get poorer.
Then they still complain about it after, while the plenty of good single men continue to rot alone without anyone.
They enter harems knowingly, willingly, then complain about the harem.
I hate whores so much.
But this isn't a new take. Usually when someone makes one of these "water = wet" posts it's because something happened to make them mad enough to post it. Otherwise there's no point.
I'm angry all the time. I have not known peace in decades
If your dog is barking at the back door and your wife is yelling at the front door, who do you let in first? The dog, of course. He'll shut up once you let him in.