All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
Is there an agenda with the recent rise of incest porn? Why are all of these adult sites suddenly trying to brainwash men into wanting their own family members? Why has there been a boom in this nasty content in the past two years? Even Game of Thrones has it on full display, "look at how sexy this is, yes, look at it, think of how hot this would be in real life".
I've been researching porn sites and learned about how every major porn site is controlled by an influencing company called MindGeek. They've already been trying to encourage pedophilia for the last decade with the "legal teen" shit, but what is their end goal? Why are they trying to destroy healthy human sexuality?
Headline: Why are so many feminists obsessed with their genitals?
A lot of feminist stuff is associated with female genitalia. There are vagina monologues, vagina hats, vagina boats, paintings using period blood, yoghurt made out of vaginal yeast, etc.
You don't see MRAs do anything similar. Even the most extremist people in the manosphere don't do anything involving penises. The closest I've ever seen was the Wiener's Out thing in South Park, which was a parody.
I wonder why. The expected answer is that women's sexuality is oppressed and stuff, but I really don't see any social situation where penises are more appropriate than vaginas. In fact, it's the opposite: Female nudity is more socially acceptable than male nudity, whether it's in art or in real life. Women who flash their boobs or vaginas are met with cheers, while men who show their penises to people are arrested.
Granted, men do draw dicks on walls, but they don't really do it out of celebration of their masculinity, and it's considered more of a childish thing. Drawing dicks is mostly associated with juvenile humour, while the feminist vagina thing is supposedly classy and deep.
What are your thoughts?
Wish I was joking: even family can’t resist Chad.
There was a HUGE blowout fight in my neighborhood just now between a middle-aged woman and her sister. Why? The woman caught her sister in bed with her son. Yes, the sister’s nephew. Tall, handsome 20 year old Chad. He was trying to pull his mom off his aunt saying shit like “don’t blame her, we fell in love, it happens!” The mom then kicked both of them out and I literally watched them get in a car together and speed off.
If this ain’t a black pill nothing else can be. I wish I was trolling.
65% of primate males never reproduce
This is the future of humanity, they are returning us to the old way of a single chad fucking the entire tribe while the betas gather berries for him to eat.
(cynicel)
Honestly I can see where this is going in the future. Each family unit being composed of 1 alpha male chad with a harem of 5 roasties. He basically fulfills the physical desires of the women, while there are 4 soy boys live in the family unit who fulfill their emotional desires and raise the alpha male's children. The soy boys are fed soy milk from birth instead of breast milk to ensure femininity and are castrated before they hit puberty like some form of modern day eunuchs.
This is a utopia for women. This is what they want. They concurrently get the alpha fucks with the Chad while they get the beta bucks from the soy boys.
(Mr-Mercedes-)
Soon reproduction-Chads will make up less than 1% of the male pop. They'll basically serve as sperm banks in the feminist NWO.
(streetsofsteel)
You idiot, you think you are special? You think many of us don't have high paying jobs, eat healthy, go to the gym regularly? I bet on paper I am a better, more successful man than you in almost every way. But unlike you when the women start screaming for beta bucks in 5 years I will refuse to answer, because these women refused to acknowledge me now when I am youthful enough to enjoy the family I wish to have.
(miku_cuck_killer)
Chads and libtards are now at the service of femoids, that's how we the based high IQ guys get to be ignored and western civilization goes down. Nice post my man, solid thinking. Wish more people were like you, maybe that way we could recover the world and put femoids in there place
(Toolman890)
I will dedicate my life to reversing this trend: 65% of females will never fuck Chad. You want to make us suffer, then we will make you suffer! Incellah!
(con1000000)
This is 100% the reason that so many religions have monogamy as a central rennet, religion is an incel creation to control women and chads for the betterment of humanity.
(Yemanthing)
Thank fuck global warming and other destructive shit is going to destroy humanity before this happens...
The American settlement belongs to the European descendents of those that established the state in the Eastern parts of America (and gave the previous residents the right to either assimilate to that state with equal rights or keep tribal ties on reservations)
You "could argue" that the South-West part of America should belong to Natives/Mexicans based on the fact that there was a noteworthy presence of farming and populated agricultural development there, but we can only have that discussion if and when the original european-american nation is recognized
Also, the descendents of Native Americans DO NOT BENEFIT FROM MORE MIGRATION as their lives ALSO get worse
What's your age range for "child"?
A parent should be training the child for the real world, not simply showing affection. That could turn it for the worse for the kid (I.e. spoiled people or those unprepared for living alone). I have no say in how people parent, but had I the power i would ban everyone from being a parent. But that's not a thing so whatever.
Many don't see killing or abuse as a bad thing. In fact, many societies have promoted such behavior and continue to do so.
~~~~~
I didnt say Islam is the only way to parent (I dont think it says too much on that topic). Nor did I say to withdraw love, I said not to just only show love and that's it.
You would reinforce your religion on your kids because you theoretically "know" it's true. Why parents care so much is beyond me, but I suspect its due to the modern view of parenting where your kids are your trophies or toys. Im sure reinventing the method of parenting would help resolve this issue and grant greater freedom of choice more effectively, while resulting in less deconversions. Parents suck: its a skill thats never taught and everyone believes is natural; obviously its not. This is one reason im against society-based morals because society is not often very bright.
Why is doing harm bad? There are countless examples and perspectives to indicate that harm can be good. There's a reason why there are so many philosophies regarding ethics. But i can give simple examples: For one, it can instill discipline and promote deterrence. Second, survival of the fittest. Third, self defense and prevention. Fourth, to stop "evil" from taking hold. Fifth, makes the mother happy.
Re: Today I Was Assaulted By My Biological Sister And The Police Didn't Arrest Her
[LONG POST REDACTED]
Tl;dr Sister stole 20 bucks from nephew. I ask where it is. She gets offended and we argue. She threatens me with violence and I don't back down. She starts swinging at me, I evade the punches but she cuts parts of my face, leaves two long red streaks on my chest and I call the police. Police show up, see the cuts and don't arrest her even after 'giving me the choice'.
(mikesteane)
I would give Charles the 20 pounds and write your fridge off to experience. Then cut your sister out of your life and let her dig her own grave.
PS: A useful trick if someone is throwing punches at you and you do not want to hit back is to deliberately bring your elbows up in front of her fists, if you can. A fist meeting and elbow will get the worst of the encounter and what is she going to say: "he attacked my hands with his elbows!"?
(ThePigmanAgain)
and what is she going to say: "he attacked my hands with his elbows!"?
Yes. And in this day and age she could probably get away with it too!
(TheMythof_Feminism)
Police show up, see the cuts and don't arrest her
I'm surprised they didn't detain YOU.
I know this is not what you want to hear, but you made a huge mistake. Never call the police, I have read many stories where something similar to what you describe happens (woman starts a fight, man calls police) and it ends with the man being taken away in irons.
Yeah I know that doesn't make sense, but that's how skewed things are in favor of women.... those visible cuts saved you.
(Wsing1974)
Please don't advise men not to call the police. Yes, it's true that men will often not be treated seriously, and it's also true that occasionally the male victim is the one who gets arrested.
But if we're ever going to change this scenario, we need to get female on male assaults documented. We need the statistics to show that domestic violence is not a gendered issue. We need women to be jailed over this.
We can advise men to get better evidence - like pictures, video, and confessions. We can advise them to separate themselves from women before calling. But please don't advise them to not call. That's only going to perpetuate the problem.
(TheMythof_Feminism)
Domestic violence calls do not end well for men. I will advise them on what I consider to be the best choice for the circumstances, in this instance the application of law is so horrendously skewed against men that I do not think it is a good idea to call the police.
You believe calling the police and risking a terrible outcome will accomplish this?
I would never throw a man under the bus for "the greater good". I understand your general argument but your methods are unacceptable to me.
(IronJohnMRA)
I'm sorry but I disagree completely. Mandatory arrest and no drop prosecution make this too risky of an action for me to ask men to take. For the time being, I will continue to advise them not to do it.
(Kirei64)
In my country, people are always complaining about the fact that "police don't take into account women's complaints", that women are harassed and can't do nothing. But these idiots don't realize that police also don't take into account men's complaints, and that most of men can't do a single thing when a woman tries to hit them. What you're saying is a large proof that there is cases of women who punches men unfairly (and I think that a woman saying to a man that she would "kick him in his balls" is also pretty sexist). As long as there is this stupid "women are wonderful effect", most people will not realise that women can be violent and cruel (stealing money from a 12 old nephew is heartless, and she even tried to punch you for complaining about that...) In fact, people needs to know that women can be evil too, so cases like your will not occur again.
(HeForeverBleeds)
I don't trust the CJS for reasons like this. I've experienced first hand and learned about countless more accounts of males assaulted by women at best not getting justice even after reporting, and often being treated as the abuser
People say male-on-female violence is worse and more dangerous, but a female has more recourse against a violent man than vice versa. If a man doesn't hit back, he gets seriously injured. If he does hit back, he gets arrested. And whichever he chooses, the CJS isn't going to protect him from the abuser
I'm really sorry this happened. Have you considered cutting her out of your life entirely? Would that even be possible? Toxic relationships are terrible things to endure, and her being a close relative doesn't make it any more justifiable
I honestly don't really see the point of trying to win over non-White people. I mean, our goals are unapologetically pro-White. Ultimately, our goals are to reclaim our societies and prevent non-Whites from flooding into them again in the future. Why on Earth would non-White people support those goals when keeping the White race cucked serves their racial interests?
If you think that we can convince non-Whites to come to some kind of mutually beneficial agreement where we both go our own ways and trade with each other, then you're simply wrong and dangerously naive. They want access to our societies, and they'll beat the shit of us if we try to stop them.
We always create better societies than they do, and so their standards of living will be severely harmed if we force them to live in their own societies away from us. That's why they're always going to be trying to break into our societies, and so it's our responsibility to push them out against their will.
They're not going to shake our hands and go "Okay. You guys got your society and we have ours. That sounds fair to me!" Any attempt to prevent them from piggybacking off of our success will be violently resisted. I mean, would you want to live in fucking Africa?
There's no way in fuck that blacks are ever going to respect our desire to maintain our own societies for ourselves, or agree to set up their own independent nations. Some of the more radical black nationalists might say that they want to escape supposed White oppression and live in an all-black society, but judge them by their actions. They're always trying to force their way into "White supremacist" institutions and benefit from our tax dollars.
99.99% of black nationalists are frauds, and the other 0.01% don't know enough about race realism to realize that blacks literally aren't genetically capable of creating advanced societies. They don't really want a black ethnostate because they know that it will suck because literally all black nations suck. What they really want is more gibs from us, and for us to completely bend over for them. They might want their own black enclaves, but at the same time they want us to keep giving them more free handouts rather than pursuing a goal of true independence and black self-reliance.
To the black mindset, liberation isn't the ability to escape Whiteness and gain their independence so that they're free to organically reach their full racial potential by erecting their own societies without outside influence. Liberation is unfettered access to Whiteness where they're free to marry our women, live in our neighborhoods, attend our schools, work at our businesses, and receive massive amounts of handouts from us. It's a fundamentally different mindset from we White nationalists where we genuinely want full independence from other races.
That's why you should only focus on red-pilling other Whites. They're the only people that really matter in this struggle for White independence from non-Whites. Once we've won over a majority of White people, then it won't matter what non-White people think about our desires to keep them the fuck away from us. They'll simply be forced to leave whether they like it or not.
And try to think about it this way: do you think that it's up to you or me whether or not Japan has a right to remain Japanese? Fuck no. The Japanese don't give a fuck what we think about their immigration policies because it's their country, not ours. We as White people need to have the same mindset. Who cares what non-Whites think about our desire to prevent them from living in our societies? It's not fucking up to them. If we have to seek permission from non-Whites over whether or not it's okay to maintain our own societies for ourselves, then we've already lost the war.
BOOM BOOM: Theory - Annapolis Shooter Was False Flag Operative That Has Been Apprehended
What are the chances that we FINALLY caught someone perpetrating a false flag on behalf of the deep state?
EVIDENCE OF DEEP STATE OPERATOR
>BURNED HIS FINGERTIPS
Probably the most damning piece of evidence. Why hide his identity so much? This kind of behavior has NEVER been seen before in ANY mass shooting event. Suggests that he was trying to hide his involvement in the shooting so that a patsy could take the fall instead.
>UNCOOPERATIVE
Again, what other mass shooting as resulted in an uncooperative suspect, who needed to be interrogated? Prior perpetrators have never been characterized as "uncooperative."
>DID NOT EXCHANGE GUN FIRE WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT
Finally, the fact that a shooter who is subsequently "uncooperative," would likely be "uncooperative," to go into custody without a fight. My guess? Like other deep state operators, he assumed the responding law enforcement would let him slide.
>FOUND UNDER THE DESK
Again, this suggests that the shooter assumed he would be able to escape the scene without detection or under the protection of other operatives.
>LAW ENFORCEMENT ARRIVED WITHIN 60 SECONDS
Rapid response for law enforcement to a mass shooting is also similarly uncharacteristic. Annapolis PD had a drill yesterday shooting, which is typical for a false flag event. The difference? Annapolis did NOT stand down. Also, Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms was on the scene as well, suggesting maybe some white hats from federal government were tasked to handle this situation.
I did these points in order of most compelling to least. In combination, this is HIGHLY UNUSUAL and SUGGESTS FALSE FLAG OPERATOR HAS BEEN APPREHENDED.
EVIDENCE OF FALSE FLAG ATTACK
>TIMING
Rosenstein and Wray just finished testifying before House Committee. Deep state trying to distract for other deep state members.
>NO MOTIVE
Just like Vegas shooting, no clear motivation is offered here. Again, its early, but generally a motivation is the first topic to be covered.
(Note: They are reacting to pictures from a Tinder experiment. A Lookism user pretended to be a 15-year-old boy, and claims to have gotten over 700 matches.)
Just be underage bro | Lookism user catfishes as 15yo Chad
(ScaryCancel)
I did not need this sui-fuel today.
(LowTwo5)
Holy fuck it's over for oldcels. "Just mature bro, you'll get higher SMV in your thirties" - AHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
(nigbuck)
Wish I wasn't too much of a pussy to kill myself, there is literally no point in being alive if you don't look anything close to that with similar height
(MEplusYOURMOM)
"You're a sick pedo if you're attracted to anybody under 18!"
"Cum in me, young 16 year old Chad."
White Sharia when?
(Ploard)
More screenshots here: https://lookism.net/Thread-FEMALE-PEDOPHILES-exposed-on-Tinder
Daily reminder: the age of consent in California is 18
(satansbarbedcock)
God. Women are such degenerate sluts.
(trancefan95_15)
No wonder female teachers keep fucking their students
(Unloveable_Recluse)
females need dem bones, no matter what age they're developing at lol.
(hhhh__)
I thought pedophiles were all ugly old men ??
(coke_and_rum)
When high school teachers fuck their students, they look like him.
Oh, not to make this even longer than it already is, but I just wanted to add that you 100% have the right to be skeptical of men.
It’s a gut instinct to fear men, because they, as a class, have never done anything to give us a reason not to fear them. They wouldn’t tell us we're overreacting if we said we’re skeptical bears, because obviously bears are dangerous creatures and humans have every reason to fear them. Men have raped and killed far, far more women than bears have killed humans, yet women are somehow shamed for fearing men.
Those hateful pricks are on OUR turf. Despite how disgusting and awful the whole 'trans' turd mix is, it does make me smile that feminists, and lesbians, and lesbian feminists get in their way so much and give those filthy gobstix of shit and bile so much of the rage!
Time itself is moving faster
Is it just me or do seconds seem faster now?
I remember when I was younger we would use things like "one-one thousand, two-one thousand" and "one Mississippi, two Mississippi" to count and it was very close to the time.
Now, it's not even close. Try it yourself. Get anybody you know to count to 30 and have your stopwatch going, every time they will be short 5 seconds or more.
I'm not sure if it's a Mandela Effect but I didn't know where else to talk about this.
It's either this reality is moving faster than it used to, I'm in a different reality where seconds are faster, or time is just moving faster relative to me. I'm only 30 so it hasn't been that long since I counted to 10 on the playground.
What do you guys think? Is time moving faster now?
Just Be A Neo Nazi Bro
(StunningResearcher)
That's impossible. I know women, and women wouldn't do that. You altered the picture. There is another story. Women can detect hatred and awful personalities and they judge you harshly on these things. That's why you're incel. I know these things.
(movielover2018)
Personality detector fails again.
(KhalilYousuf3)
Chads jaw always jams it.
(R1415)
Only works for SS-Nazi-Chads.
The racist incels-in-denial who sit in their rooms all day posting Hitler memes aren't getting shit.
(copekoro)
they must have great personalities right IT
(JelqFrost)
In just the last couple weeks I've seen posts here from incels who describe their politics as "so left [they're] practically an anarchist", moderate, apathetic, and there was even one dude complaining about getting banned whenever he tries to explain why he agrees with nazis.
A man's political beliefs don't affect his chances with women in the slightest. You might get kicked out of certain online discussions, but it's your face that determines whether or not you're IRL fuckable.
(Ploard)
Yeah, she's a bad person...
we have: one girl supporting a nazi, one guy who IS a nazi.
And incels use that as a reason to hate women....
The premise of it is that the Nazi is actually bad. And the point you are missing is that there's no such thing as an "irredeemably bad personality" if you are good looking. Sure, not every girl might be into you, but you'd still have plenty of girls throwing themselves at you. "Plenty" as in "more than any average or below average guy could dream of".
(Crazylikethatglue)
It just shows 1 example of many of womens hypocrite behaviour. You don't get to advocate for womens vile hypocrite behaviour.
(StunningResearcher)
Or not OP because, you know, nazis are scum
Whatever women accept sexually will, by the simple reality of life, be what is passed on to the next generation.
You women really choose well...
If you dig deep enough you can find factual evidence that the photo of the Sandy Hook shooter is really poorly photoshoped. I've seen the research and am certainly no expert but basic knowledge of Photoshop can teach you how to spot these poorly shopped pictures.
Not to mention the basics of that shooting such as the "father" who did the interview and was laughing moments before he asked if they were on the began to breathe heavily (a classic theatre technique to fake the emotion he showed).
And his almost laughing as he was speaking. Signs of a guilty liar.
Or the fact that they demolished the entire school and anyone that was involved in the demolition had to sign a non disclosure agreement.
I can't recall any other schools that were demolished completely after a "shooting"
They both share way to similar facial features to ignore. Yes people can look similar but the eyes are very similar, the only way we would know for sure is to examine the iris of both of their eyes to find a match.
Edit: removed a word. On mobile forgive me.
I thought Trump was an idiot. I did not vote for him or HRC.
Now I know he and his staff are geniuses. He knows that he can't get the word out about the treason of the previous admin in the MSM. They will bury the corruption and treason of the previous administration, DOJ, FBI and Russia probe. Even Fox and the news aggregator Drudge. All mockingbirds. So what can you do? Well you bypass them. Go straight to your supporters on the internet.
This is not the only example of genius I see. Flynn playing along and taking the plea deal, forcing their hand. Bypassing the creation of a uselss special council w/ Huber. Etc.
It took quite a bit of courage to post this here because now, I will be banned from /r/insane peoplefacebook or whatever. We should start a support subreddit for devistated individuals such as myself.
This was planned. Trump was always going to do something about this but trolled the media into covering it and exposing it as an Obama issue. If Trump fixed this problem most would never know it happens or that it was fixed. Now everyone knows child trafficking at our border is a REAL problem that has been brought to our yard
Re:Netflix produces show starting asian girl with 5 love interests: none of them are Asian
(bobbyninet)
The abuse never ends for us. They are waging total war against us. They hate us to the point they want to stop us reproducing. They want our own sisters to despise us and worship them. And right now they're winning. They ALL HATE US. Get it into your fucking head, we're on our own. Make as much money as possible, do what you can to increase immigration from Asia. We, Asian men, have to take control of Hollywood. That's the only way for this shit to stop. This is so blatant, such an obvious act of war against us. We are the most hated and disrespected group on this planet. Get off your arse and fight the battle.
(wolfoffantasy)
Educate your sisters and women in your family of whats going on guys
Keep them woke and make sure they realize theirs a a silent war going on to brainwashing their minds. Asian women and men are being attacked relentlessly 24 7 in American media.
I have a little sister that's 12 years old and I am always talking to her about Asian crimes and issues effecting Asian Americans. She's going to grow up strong, confident and woke.
All you guys need to do the same.
(segmento2)
Disgusting, but completely expected.
(asianblaazin)
Where's the show with an asian guy and 5 love interests?
(Rahul4pm)
Cancelled because white supremacists got too triggered
(Sihairenjia)
This is a clear example of what is wrong with Asian American gender relations.
The author of the original novels, Jenny Han, is a Korean American. Judging by her last name, she was not adopted by white parents.
The protagonist of the original novels, Lara Jean Song Covey, is half-Korean, half-white. She goes by Lara Jean, with Song as a middle name, so I assume product of WMAF.
The lead actress they selected to play the above character is Lana Therese Condor - a full Asian of Vietnamese descent adopted by white parents.
The novel spent 40 weeks in the New York Times best selling list for young adult fiction, so I'm not surprised a film was made.
However, you can still read a racial bias in the decision to cast a FULL ASIAN in the role of what should have been a half-Korean, half-white character.
This is without even going into whatever problems the author Jenny Han might have had that led her to write a fantasy about a half-white, half-Korean girl whose boy friends are all not Asian.
In fact, this article indicates that one of the worries the author had going into the film, was that it would be white washed - ie that it wouldn't feature an Asian American woman as the protagonist but would put a white woman in her place. Obviously, she doesn't have a problem with the lack of Asian American men, because there were no Asian American men in her novels, either.
(foxcnnmsnbc)
This is exactly what Phil from Wong Fu is talking about.
You have a bunch of angry dudes on Reddit complaining about media content. Making all sorts of bitter, whiny remarks.
You're so unhappy and you think they should cast more Asian guys? Then produce your own content and put it on Youtube. If you're so right, then you should be very successful. There should be hoards of Asian guys willing to watch it and financially sponsor your show.
Yet, none of you do. Instead, you sit on Reddit posting trailers and complaining about Asian female writers and Wong Fu. Then go back to doing your software engineering work.
Phil was on point.
(sam_rock_well)
except there isn't. and that's our point. who's going to make shows that appeal to 1% of the population (AMs who are aware of whats going on) when you can produce programs that will stroke WM egos and satisfy wish fulfilment for AFs at once. That's where the money is.
and do you really think there aren't AM writers/creators out there? who do you think is gatekeeping them from success? why do college students read Joy Luck Club but not Frank Chin? It's NOT cause Frank Chin doesn't exist or didn't try.
(scoobydooatl01)
More suicide fuel for AM. Good old liberal Hollywood where (only certain types) of diversity is pushed all day long.
After a recent discussion on GCdebatesQT I've been thinking about the characteristics male animals demonstrate before being allowed in a group of females. To enter female spaces a male has to:
Demonstrate that every member male who is joining the females is not an active threat to the females or their offspring.
Demonstrate that there is some benefit to the females for allowing males to enter said group.
Demonstrate that they intend on ensuring that they will place no burden on the resources the females use for themselves or their offspring.
In regards to point 1 TIM's have refused to even acknowledge any of the dangers to women if they are allowed in our space. In nature if a male was threatening a female or young member of the in group you wanted to be a member of the males would kill it to protect the females and young.
In regards to point 2 I would say that there is clearly no benefit to women to allow TIM's into our spaces and instead of offering us anything they demand access because they believe we owe them protection from males and validation for their identity.
In regards to point 3 just look at their demands to use women's resources for rape and suicide counselling.
So my question is, setting aside the fact that they are attempting to colonize womanhood, how different would our conversations go if they had cared to meet any of the requirements that any other female would require?
I found GenderCritical several months ago after I saw it referred to as a vile hate sub numerous times and got curious what all the fuss was about. After spending some time lurking here, I feel extremely disconcerted. It was (and still is) very bizarre to me that posters here are classified as "hateful bigots" for little more than acknowledging basic biological reality. Meanwhile, I see the dangerous rhetoric of trans activists being espoused even by people who consider themselves part of the 'skeptic, anti-SJW' crowd. For example, I routinely see posters on subs like TumblrInAction, a place devoted to making fun of woke SJW types, come out of the woodwork to cry bigotry and transphobia anytime someone expresses any criticism of the trans movement.
I'm left wondering: how on earth did the trans cult become so widespread so fast? Why are people who consider themselves logical, rational people still buying into the bullshit? Why are people allowing mentally ill individuals dictate how we should behave and think? I refuse to believe that anyone actually considers a TIM to be a real woman, so why do people fall all over themselves enforcing everyone else to believe it? What really baffles me is the support and mindless praise heaped on TIMs when meanwhile incels are reviled by everyone. Plenty of the rhetoric coming from TRAs could very well have been said by the incel crowd. Claiming that women should be obligated to have sex with undesirable men is disgusting when Incel Ian says it, but somehow it's progressive and woke as soon as he puts on a dress and demands to be called Isabelle? WTF?
What really scares me is the sheer hatred directed at women who don't buy into the narrative. I don't even consider myself a feminist - I don't label myself as anything really - but I felt I needed to make a throwaway just to post here because of the rabid responses I got for even hinting at agreeing with some gender critical views. Is it really so hateful to say that no, I don't think "feeling like woman" makes someone an actual woman? Saying that I don't feel comfortable sharing a public restroom with a man wearing makeup is now hate speech? Can I really not acknowledge situations in which women and girls face adversity specifically because of our sex without being slandered as a 'crazy TERF'?
It's shocking to me that we have come to this point, and lurking here has opened my eyes in so many ways. I have to believe, for my own sanity, that society will eventually look back on the trans trend with a deep collective embarrassment and shame.
The Playboy Mansion in particular has/had a pretty well documented history as a front for CIA blackmail ops. Whenever the CIA is involved, all expectation of ethics should be tossed out the window immediately. It's quite likely the facility was used for what the CIA likes to call "child compromise", which is where a target is placed in to a compromising situation (i.e. sex with a minor), and then leveraged for blackmail.
Vanishing McDonald's
So, this is a story that still trips the fuck out of my mom, dad, and me (or at least it did with my dad until he died...). To sum it up, we literally saw a McDonald's vanish in the blink of an eye as we were driving to it. There's no other way to put it. This happened years ago after my parents were done filing their taxes. In front of the tax place there was a McDonald's very directly in front in the same parking lot. We had agreed upon dining there, so we got into our car and we were driving towards it. As we were driving to it, it literally... teleported. Vanished. I don't know how to put it. My mom started getting really scared, and we pulled up to the parking lot where it should have been. It was gone. My dad was in incredible disbelief, attempting to rationalize what had just happened, and we decided to search everywhere all up and down the street for it. Nothing. My dad even brought up a question. What the hell happened to the people inside? And yes, it literally vanished in front of my eyes. It was an incredibly weird experience. Nothing even close has ever happened since then.
So to put me and my family's thoughts at rest, what the hell actually happened that day? Was it really a "glitch", or were we just collectively hallucinating the mcdonalds? And no, we weren't on drugs!
The Shawshank Redemption (2)? It was advertised on the side of a bus shelter 2015 or 2016, I saw it whilst walking past. I live in England, UK. The advertisement basically indicated it was a modern re-make on the classic, exact same title, different actors, obviously due to the original ones ageing. I was excited to see the new re-make. It didn't say it had already been released and you can now view it in cinemas, it stated it was coming to cinemas soon, I remember this VIVIDLY.
Anyway, I got home, I went to Google in order to get information on the exact release date, and I just couldn't find it anywhere, it's like it didn't exist. Upon the failed Google search, I thought to myself, OK.. Interesting, maybe it's not been added to Google yet, but then I thought, why would it be printed off, attached and advertised on a bus shelter but not on Google, "online" where everything happens these days? But more odd, how could it possibly say "coming to cinemas soon" and Google doesn't know anything about it? And then I thought, I've not heard or seen anyone talk about this re-make film at all, ever.
Around 3-4 days later, I was walking back past it, and the advertisement had gone, it had been replaced by something else, as much as all this was odd I didn't pay "too much" attention to it, I just noticed it was a different advertisement.
I asked several people if they've heard of the re-make movie, nobody has, I asked a friend who is a movie buff, like myself, but more so, and she had never heard of it either. I was thinking to myself, WHAT!? Wtf happened to this re-make I saw..?????
Transcript:
IF YOU TELL PEOPLE TO BELIEVE WOMEN WHEN THEY'RE RAPED,
BUT GASLIGHT THEM WHEN THEIR CHILDREN REGRESS INTO AUTISM FROM VACCINES,
YOU'RE NOT A FEMINIST
As a rape victim, I am more than qualified to comment on this topic. Pro-vaxxers who comment will be swiftly dispatched.
An abandoned hospital that I spent hours researching was never abandoned
About a year ago I was google researching cool abandoned places to explore in the area I lived in. It’s pretty rural where I live so I was surprised and very interested when I came across an abandoned hospital that was in the next county over. I spent a couple of hours reading about it, it’s supposed hauntings, looking at pictures, and watching videos of people exploring it. This hospital was a lot different than what a normal hospital looks like, it was only one story and was basically a giant rectangle, it was really long but not super wide, I found it weird because I’d never seen hospitals constructed like that. I really wanted to go but couldn’t find anybody willing to go with me and I’m too chicken to go by myself so I saved a link to my notes about it and pretty much forgot about it until I met somebody who said they’d be down to explore it.
So the next chance I got I went to the link I’d saved on my phone where I’d first seen it mentioned, but I couldn’t find it. That in itself wasn’t super strange because it hadn’t been mentioned in the article but in the comment section. I figured the comment chain had been deleted or maybe I’d saved the wrong link. I remembered that it had a rather distinctive name (first name, initial, last name, HOSPITAL) and I remembered the county that it had been in so I googled abandoned hospital in anywhere USA and pretty quickly found a hospital that had the right name, I looked at the google images and confirmed that it was the same place I’d been thinking of, the only problem was that it was no longer abandoned. I figured that maybe I was mistaken and spent several more hours trying to find any other hospital but I kept on getting led back to the first hospital, I couldn’t find any of the abandoned pictures and videos that I’d watched a year before.
I figured that maybe it had been reopened in the past year so I called the hospital to ask for details and was eventually transferred to the building historian (or something like that) and she told me that to her knowledge this hospital had been in operation since it was built. Now this is where it really gets weird, I asked the historian if she knew of any other abandoned hospitals in the area that I might be getting confused with and she told me that she knew of none, but that she had received a few calls from people asking the same exact thing as me over the past several months.
I’ve spent probably around ten hours searching the internet for the hospital I’d originally seen and can find no trace of it, I’ve also asked the friends who I’d tried and failed to convince to go explore it with me and most of them remembered me talking to them about it. At this point I really have no idea what to think about this whole thing.
If you are still using social media then you are making women have power over you
If you are looking at women on Instagram, tinder, Facebook or anything like that then you are making women have power over you. You are literally giving them validation and letting them have the confidence boost that comes with rejecting guys like you. Then you end up feel bad and feeling rejected. All of this process happens just by the simple act of looking at women on one of those sites. The only social media site that is okay to look at women on is YouTube.
Daily reminder that women are the biggest supremacist group in the world
"I know an ugly guy who has a hot girlfriend, you guys are full of shit!"
Okay, I dont doubt you. Well, I kind of do, you're probably overstating how ugly he is and overstating how hot the girl is for dramatic effect, while leaving out other important details that make the relationship work (usually money) but I believe the core concept of what you're saying, that it's not impossible for an ugly guy to find a partner.
I dont think anyone here believes it's actually 100% impossible to find someone, but finding someone you're compatable with is another story. You IT folk always talk about how attraction just happens, and you cant force it, so please stop expecting us to drop our standards to absolute 0 just to get a partner. At that point it's basically literal objectification. You see her as only a hole to fuck because theres absolutely no other reason to be with someone youre not attracted to in any way at all.
Most of us dont have insane standards contrary to popular belief. Were not looking for super models.
My standards:
-Around my age
-not morbidly obese
-hygenic
-not emotionally or physically abusive
-3/10+ face
That's not really asking for much at all, especially since I exceed all of those requirements myself.
Anyways, back to the core point. Firstly, the pool of young women willing to date an ugly guy is a lot smaller than the amount of unattractive guys. In the words of SJW's, we face unconscious biases and have to jump through many hoops that the average person, especially woman, will never understand. We face systemic prejudice in the form of lookism on a daily basis. People automatically believe attractive people have better personality traits and the opposite is true for ugly people
Telling us about how you know an ugly guy with a girlfriend and that disproves everything we say is like telling a poor black person that racism doesn't exist because you know successful black people, and its 100% their own fault for the position they are in now.
the ULTIMATE blackpill
this for me was bigger than any blackpill i had witnessed or seen online.
looksmaxxing to a point where you can no longer go further, and STILL not being enough for anything close to your looksmatch
at this point you are effectively finished, you have maximised your genetic potential and there is no more "oh if i just do X" or "if i just get Y", you failed.
having reached this point myself and still being considered subhuman because of my genetics, this has been the most difficult thing to accept.
also its even worse when you get told to "just do this bro" when you've carefully and gradually improved your appearance over many years
People who pretend to see ugly guys with hot girls all the time are delusional.
I legit never see that. I mean it might happen, but it is an extremely rare occurrence.
More likely explanation: they see guys THEY FIND ugly with hot girls all the time.
Considering women find most men ugly, this would make a lot of sense.
FACT: women would rather not be abused by Chad but they would still prefer the same abusive Chad in bed over a nice polite skinny/fat/short dude. Female lurkers, prove me wrong.
Women would rather not be abused by Chad but they would still prefer the same abusive Chad in bed over a nice polite skinny/fat/short dude.
Even if she dumps the abusive Chad, she's only going to move on to the next Chad...not turn to the nice and polite but physically unimpressive loser who genuinely loves her and would never hurt her... because they are not perceived as assertive and strong, but weak and unmanly.
Being assertive and strong are hailed as manly traits, and are recommended in "advice" columns for guys looking to improve their "game". It just comes naturally to Chads and women like it.
Women think with their clits.
[Comments under "White people need to get over their pro-Israel mentality"]
@Farfalle_Man
@jenniferlovehugetits
@Farfalle_Man
What do we with jews if not israel? Them going extinct isn't ideal, so they need a state. Would you consider making a new jewish state in either Europe or America?
Them going extinct isn't ideal
Yes it is.
Jews that keep to themselves are very respectable. They are trad, community oriented, and do a lot of thinking and discussion on philosophy and other things.
Posted by jenniferlovehugetits:
philosophy
Lol. Are you trolling? Jews have been an overwhelming net negative on this world. Without them the world would be a much better place.
I hate all women. I'm tired of hiding it.
Sorry, I said it. 27 years old, about to be 28, been pretty successful in my career up until this point (I work in film), I'm a really nice person that unfortunately wears my heart on my sleeve. Just wanted to find a decent girl to join me in the journey of life, but i've slowly realized over several horrible years that I've been completely brainwashed my whole life into wanting something that DOESNT. FUCKING. EXIST. It's all a cruel societal lie, what I've been fed about the true nature of women. Nobody cares about men. Nobody cares who you are. The millennial woman is truly a cancerous and toxic creature--solipsistic, calculating, and sociopathic in the deepest and most damaging of ways. They take and take and take and offer absolutely nothing in return. Going through the most depressing period of my life right now. Apologies for the rant, I'm just really hurting. Thank you all for this sub, the humor and the truth of it all--it keeps me sane on days I want to end it.
Men are the romantic sex. All things considered, only men are capable of truly loving another human being.
This is a thought that I've been entertaining for a while now. It started the day I realized most love-related creations have been the work of men. Love poems? Written mostly by men. Love songs? Same. Theater plays about love? Created by men. Romanticism? Mostly a male movement. Even in architecture...some Indian guy is grieving due to the death of his wife and he has the fucking Taj Mahal built. Ed Skalnin is rejected by some dumb girl who didn't want him and he builds an entire park out of coral, he himself alone.
Men are also those most likely to kill themselves over a breakup or infidelity. Men have a harder time moving on from a failed relationship. Ever listened to the traditional music in most countries? They feature stories of men who got their heart broken. Very few talk about a woman going through the same circumstances.
Well I do hate men and by extension I do hate trans identified males. I don't see the problem in that. Men are the harbingers of murder evil selfish death. Every woman knows what I mean.
Has anyone noticed the lack of empathy women possess?
They don’t care about anyone other than themselves. This is why feminism is such a popular movement overall, it’s a chance for women to gain privileges and gain superiority over men. They make false claims like the wage gap then cry for imaginary justice against the so-called “patriarchy”, what a load of shit.
They especially hate incels, I remember I watched this one YouTube video of an attention whoring female going through an incel forum. She didn’t care at all about the posts involving suicide or depression, she just kept on crying about how the incels wanted to hurt and rape females even when most incels are peaceful.
Well, most libfems i've talked with are all about men, and they were defending them every chance they got. They were always bring their boyfriends, dads, brothers or husbands in every conversation about the reality of male violence. My bf is sooo nice, my dad is awesome, you know, so male violence isn't a thing!! Stop being such a paranoid man hater! Misandry is AS bad as misogyny! Women are AS violent as men are, it's not a male issue! Woman are rapists too! Yup. "Feminists" told me that. Not MRAs, "feminists".
So, dear libfems, why are you even calling yourselves feminists, if you don't think that women are oppressed and often abused by men?... I do HAVE a bf, but i know that doesn't mean that male violence isn't a thing! Sure, he respect me, he loves me, blablabla who cares, but i've been abused and raped by men before. I know that men are the fucking problem, it's a fact not an opinion, that most women are better off alone than married with men, and female violence is actually really rare. Even male victims of rape, violence, are raped and abused by other men, not women, not feminists, even the "misandrist TERF" ones! We have every right to hate men, and to stay away from them. We are not dangerous, we are often traumatized women, and we deserve peace. TERF is just the new "feminazi" or "evil man hater hairy lesbian feminist"... So progressive.
Ever since a recent discussion, I have had a frustration with POMO activism and how incorrect it is in regards to feminism. Another person and I were talking to the group about the need for sex-based hate crime legislation. What we find is it is nearly impossible to get valid and correct hate crime data on the percentage of hate crimes against gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgender people. Here is how sex-based hate crime legislation is necessary as a category for LGBT.
Violence against lesbians is generally NOT classified as a hate crime because lesbians are classified as "female or "woman" in police reports therefore not subject to hate crime laws. So reports of corrective rape or gay bashing are instead put in the "women dead files". Sex-based hate crime laws would also put an end to "the women's dead files" because they can not ignore hate crimes in the same manner they do other crimes. This is why trans activists demand that trans women are reported as being TRANSWOMEN, not men or women.
It sparked the usual pomo crap. sex-based laws are noninclusive of trans people "TERFs" even though, like same-sex marriage, transgender people are already protected by the law, it is women who excluded from these protections based on their sex.
The conversation changed into the same old argument. My fellow activist is a "TERF." , "Trans women are women", "She's not a real feminist because her feminism does not include trans women." blah blah blah. Please note: There was no mention of trans men being men or trans men at all. Intersexed people were brought up out of context. The co-presenter was not attacked at all, I'm male, what a shock except to point out incorrectly that I am an alleged male feminist... people keep calling me a male feminist when there is no such thing as a male feminist.
I corrected them on two points during this discussion. 1) Feminism since it's beginning only focussed on female oppression. 2) Males cannot be feminists because it is a female movement. Feminism can affect how a male thinks or moves through the world but we can not claim feminism.
They immediately went to an explosion of talking a feminist theory or feminist writings out of context. Dworkin is the only 2nd waver I can recall that included transexuals. They even quoted the heretic Germaine Greer out of context. What I realized quickly is the misuse of the words woman and gender in regards to POMO TRA/ SJW/ Liberal Feminism vs feminism. At the time of those writings starting with the founding of feminism, being a woman was defined as adult human FEMALE the reproductive sex that produces large gametes and bares children. Gender was discussed as; men (males) patriarchal (male) oppression of women (females). So contextually it has always been solely about fighting female oppression. Trans women are males and trans men are females. Nothing that they quoted proved that feminism is about the inclusion of trans women and therefore the exclusion of trans men. It has always been focussed on reproductive biology if you take a serious thoughtful look at it.
Side note: Apparently I am a frustrating transphobic fag, according to that part of the group. They always call me a faggot.
Trannies are nasty creatures
It always pisses me the fuck off when I see some norman-scum suggest that Incels should think and give a chance towards dating transexual femoids. Seriously. Why the fuck would anyone of us do that? Honestly, I do wonder what goes through the Norman brain when they suggest such degenerate crap like that. Trannies are nothing more than a bunch of mentally ill retards who are pretending to be femoids while actually being men. Which means; they have cawks. Why in damnation would we, heterosexual men, want to get into relationship with another fucking man? We aren't gay in any fucking way. And, this notion still stands towards the trannies who have cut off their cawks. Only a deeply twisted, mentally ill creature would cut their fucking cawks off. Truly revolting.
You know, only in degenerate societies would this regressing behaviour be accepted. It truly shows how humanity have fallen and stopped progressing further when we welcome these creatures with open arms. These creatures should be admitted into mental wards because they are clearly suffering from gender dysphoria.
Brief note: If you're intending to argue how pretending to be femoids while being men and cutting your cawks off is normal behavior; just fuck off. You degenerates are everything what is wrong with this society.
Religion is needed to control females
I'm not really religious, however, I do understand how religion plays a vital and important role in our society. How does it play a important role in our society, you may ask? Well, humans as a group need something to believe in that connects them to each other -- and religion gives them exactly that. It gives people a common purpose and good values to follow. We, as humans, aren't advanced enough to function well enough without any kind guidance yet. We are still far from achieving it. In my opinion, only high intelligent beings retain any kind of morality without religion.
Just look at what has become of our society when people reject religion: nothing but filled with endless degeneracy. Femoid sexual liberation, slutdom, polygamy/polyamory, cuckoldry, abortion, transexualism and feminism is thriving due to the fact that religion is slowly fading away and people are embracing immoral values into their life's. Society as we know it would not last for long if corruption has reached every level of its infrastructure.
Think about it: would femoids act so recklessly if religion was still in play? No, of course not. Religion controlled femoids animalistic instincts and put them on leashes; as they should be. Nowadays we are seeing nothing but a massive imbalancement of promiscuity, fertility and birth rates among femoids due to the so-called "progressive" sexual freedoms and feminism running rampant. It truly is sickening and revolting.
Our society has reached the pinnacle of it's decadence, and it's time to restore the balance by either embracing the Old Testament or Islam. They always knew what kind of hedonistic and degenerate creatures femoids were, and how people in general needed to behave with good ethics and morals. It's time to bring those teachings back before it's too late.
The evolution of Man and Woman. Why man is self evident and woman is unaware.
The evolutionary instincts of women are completely different from that of men. Men are utility for women because women have a naturally occurring period, gestation, and rearing. There are many factors to the way women evolve and why her behaviors are more instinctively driven from that of her male counterparts, but I'm only going to go over a few and particularly as it pertains to those reproduction traits I've listed above.
A womens' biological clock starts ticking around the age of puberty. That age has been proven to be linked directly to the capacity of the tribe/society to bring children to term and adulthood. If society is not producing healthy adults, then the age of puberty in girls gets younger and younger. This mechanism ensures that women have an innate ability to alter the course of human reproduction if required. Once the clock is ticking, she will experience trauma every month to ensure that she is aware of the opportunities for children. After a while of not having children, hormones kick in that give her thoughts of having children, even if she did not consciously want them. Once she is pregnant, she goes through a slew of other hormones that ensure she is getting enough resources or has the potential for acquiring resources to raise the child. She also undergoes significant changes to her mood and other feelings in order to bond with the child. This produces an unconditional love for the child in order for her to take the life seriously and raise it to successful reproduction as well. For all of these reasons, she only chooses to mate with males that will readily provide her the genetics that procreate healthy children, as well as men that are mentally equipped to dedicate themselves to her cause. Men that are seen as inferior to her do not get to reproduce willingly with her. Also, men do not have any of these problems as they get to reproduce regardless of any schedule or naturally occurring cycle. For this reason, men are disposable in biology and followed through in culture.
The reason why women act instinctively whereas men act practically is because reproduction would be deterred otherwise and you and I would not be here to tell this tale. She seeks men that are practical and devoted because otherwise she would not be able to care for herself and her children and again, you and I would not be here to tell this tale. The reason why she is not made self aware of her own desires/wants/needs is because having children and reproducing are the only requirement to further the race. If it were possible for her to outweigh her own desires over that of her children/future children then she would choose herself because that would be easier and more practical than going through that whole mess and again, you and I would not be here discussing the merits of evolution. Women are made clueless about their desires and choose only the best males that would dedicate themselves to her, work hard and accomplish great things, so those are the males that exist today.
The evolution of the female mind is that it can not understand or be made self aware of a thing-in-itself. The evolution of the male mind is that he must provide for females and give himself to her if need be. Women do not reproduce with men that leave them without resources to carry their children to the age of reproduction. They are in control of what genes make it to the next generation of the species, but if they understood this, they would be less likely to reproduce. They always choose resource gathering for themselves over any benefits expressed to the tribe as a whole, and for that reason allowing them to vote on political issues is dangerous at best and self destructive at worst.
Incels shouldn't contribute towards society
We live in a society that offers everyone various benefits, except for of course Incel men. Even though we are offered nothing, we are still somehow expected to contribute towards society by needlessly wageslaving and giving a specific amount of the income we receive back to the government as tax. My question is, why? Why do we need to continue paying tax to a corrupt society that not only ignores our pleas but also shuns us in every way possible?
Just ask yourselves: is society actually worth contributing towards? I say, no. Incels as a minority are harassed and discriminated against everyday, not just in real life, but on online as well. And what actions does society take to prevent such things from occurring? Nothing. We are not allowed to congregate as a community, we are not allowed to voice our opinions and we are not allowed to ask for any kind of benefits as it is deemed as being "entitled". However, this corrupt society seems to be more than happy to provide anyone who isn't an Incel with benefits using the tax money we provide. Single mothers, being a good example.
The fact of the matter is society has failed Incel men. And if the system is not going to offer us anything for our contributions, then there is simply no point for us to continue contributing towards the system in anyway. Instead of wageslaving, Incels should all drop out, fake some disabilities, and exploit the system in a way where we can bleed off this unjust society that resent us so much. This way, it will be the normans who will be paying for our living expenses, rather than us paying for them.
Edify yourself: Use the power within to metastasize greatness.
The question is not "why you are an incel", "but why are you are not playing their game". Femoids have something you want, so you have to give them something they want. If you don't have it by virtue of genetic disposition, you have to make it. If you lack the tools to make it, you have to buy their services from them. They are prostitutes because men want to purchase their goods. They are prostitutes and men purchase their goods because that is the most successful reproduction strategy.
You are not cel because you want to be, just as much as she is not woman because she wants to be. The difference is she was born with something somebody wants and will work hard to get. You are born with nothing she wants, so you will have to work much harder than if you had something she wanted.
Yes, there are 3.5 billion of them, all with something the other ~3.5 billion want. You don't possess that quality, but you should be thankful, because now you aren't looking to exchange it for something else. You are blessed because you have nothing to give, therefore you have only yourself to cherish. It is counter intuitive, because the world and your biology wants you exchange you time/energy/labor/property for their service. Realizing you don't have to give any of your things is the the enlightenment of your own free will, a gift femoids do not get because they are tempted to enter into this exchange of flesh. They loose a piece of themselves because they are expected to, but there is no burden upon you, no temptation, no loss of energy and soul to obtain temporary gratification. You are more powerful then them because you retain your essence for yourself. Use that energy for power and for issue of self gratification. Become a man without purpose to the inferior and you will always be superior.
If women are caring, nurturing humans, that are not ALL exactly the same, then why am I still a virgin?
All 3.5 billion women are the exact same. They literally function the same way as putting in formulas on a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. Which is why incels exist.
(Emphasis original)
We need a strict Patriarchy in order to put every single woman on a leash. They can not be allowed to have any sort of freedom outside of a man's influence because they can't handle it as we see in Western society.
Every modern western woman nowadays is no better than criminal scum.
When you don't coursely discipline and keep women under control, they go loose like wild beasts and spread their ass cheeks for every second Chad they encounter who then goes on to pump his load in their every hole. Governed by pure lust, as if they have no mind of their own they keep trying to satisfy these basic carnal desires through instant gratification.
There isn't a single shred of long term thinking in their primitive minds so when the time comes where they feel their biological clock is ticking, panic breaks out.
The sly filthy amoral foid then starts to look for a gullible weak man whom she can easily wrap around her finger. At that point, the disgusting used up cumrag who has devolved into a barbarian has lost all capacity for pair bonding. Don't even dream she's a type of person whom you can grow old with. No, she's long past that. Her primary incentive is to gain social points so she doesn't feel left out and also extracting resources from the stupid man.
While the poor husband is head over heels and mistakenly believes he's found a partner with whom he can build a relationship based on mutual understanding and Love, his wife is not sexually attracted to him in the slightest. Every 2 months when the man's been a good boy, he gets his dead starfish sex while she fantasises about her past sexploits with taller, more masculine and above all better looking men. They degraded her, treated her as nothing more than a meathole and she loved every second of it.
Children are conceived. A couple years later she files a divorce because "they grew apart" which really just means the foid has become bored of the bluepilled wimp, telling herself "I can do better than this". Loyalty is a totally foreign concept to woman. For a man with principles, being able to keep his word is akin to his lifeforce. Being scrupulous, consistent and reasonable is what makes a man feel actually human. Women lack all will towards this higher from of being and will strictly adopt whatever that won't ostracize them from society or their social environment. Another thing to note, women are not capable of experiencing cognitive dissonance because they only pay attention to how something feels for them in the present moment and that feeling justifies whether something is right or wrong. Whether it's immoral, deceptive or downright evil plays no part. Usually this is done through thorough applying self-deception and doublethink.
When she's gotten bored of the wimp, the woman turns into an incredibly demanding histrionic dramawhore. She's trying to rationalize everything into being the man's fault upon an impending divorce from her part.
The children then experience a breakdown of the family which brings with itself only detrimental consequences for their future in respect to their mental well-being, education and lifechoices. The profound effects of divorce is well documented in multiple academic studies with single-motherhood making things much much worse because single mothers are horrible and stupid parents.
__________________________________
Women are first of all innately morally deficient and alogical creatures who go loose like rabid bonobo's when not firmly curbed and put on their place by men.
They will degenerate everything that is intelligent and virtuous on their path of heedless destruction because they have no fucking idea what the fuck they're doing. They can not think matters through, they just can't. Woman's entire persona consists solely of the surface it reflects. You can not find anything beneath it, it's void. Her entire persona is an absorption from external influences she molds into what then consists as her core identity stemming from an extreme suggestibility. While women are mere empty individuals who can only act in accordance with the community, man is a higher form of life expressed as a differentiated individuality often referred to as the soul characterized by a strong will for greater truth and a deep connection with all that is. With the universe. It's for this reason that there has never been a single decent female philosopher nor will one ever emerge.
It also gives birth to originality and creativity which is characteristic to man. Woman can only reproduce it. Even among the poor and oppressed negro's of the USA, the blues, jazz, hip hop, rap all sprung out of young black men to draw an illustration. Let's not begin about science, classical music and ancient art. They speak for themselves. Women's achievements (always coming from the most masculine ones) bear no comparison.
Many men today are misled from what has been common knowledge since the dawn of humanity over all human societies ever surfaced. Emancipation of women isn't something enlightened or advanced from earlier patriarchal societies. It's pure stupidity and a product of capitalist policies in need for a larger wageslave force.
From a young age men are indoctrinated into a false idea of women. We are to believe women are capable of having agency, that they too are rational beings with whom we can have deep fulfilling conversations on worldly matters, that they are capable of unconditional love on the basis of who you are as a person instead of what you are, that they can breathe inspiration into your mind from insight on who you are, that women are all so different that there are certainly enough who fit these aforementioned criteria (not a single does). That a relationship where both parties stand on equal ground is possible. All these delusions are further exacerbated by media consumption with japanese animations in particular were the women are often a projection of the male producers their ideals.
__________________________________
A woman's natural inclination is submission and passivity.
She wants to be led, molded and derive her sense of identity of a man she considers to be in a dominant position. When a woman says she likes confidence, she means a man who's narcissism surpasses that of her for example. A woman can't respect a man who does not assert himself as the chief in a relationship. All of this comes easier when the male is taller because greater stature is directly imposing, hence their avid preference for this trait. This puts neatly in picture how primitive women actually are. These are her primal instincts she's incapable of sacrificing for the greater good of a society. If you let them go their own way, they will instinctively over the course of time aim primarily for apex men which will heavily skew the ratio of men and women with offspring. You see a similar instance with wild beasts such as gorilla's and even chimpanzees. In fact, this push can already be observed in "progressive" societies such as Norway where the gap between biological fathers and biological mothers has been steadily widening since female emancipation. Such a social order could never promote a civilised society as it would induce a perpetual competition between men barring them from cooperation.
A woman can not free herself from these impulses, only law and order pressed by men can guide an inherent amoral creature such as woman towards intelligent and virtuous behavior.
I thus propose extraordinary strict and harsh countermeasures for the revival of a full on Patriarchy. Beginning with a law that punishes any woman that engages in fornication through capital punishment. The capital punishment is preceded by stripping the prosecuted woman of her clothes on a public square where she is submitted to hundreds of flagellations. Once her body is covered in blood, salt is added for more pain. This form is public humiliation and inflicting of pain needs to act as a necessary deterrent for any woman who's daring to think of fornicating.
When this procedure has been completed, the woman is put out of her misery with public stoning. This helps with fostering a wider disgust and hatred towards criminals such as fornicators, so young children should be encouraged in participating to the stoning.
I'd like to emphasize once again that I'm advocating for lawful procedures enforced by the State.
We'd also need laws that would ban all women from education, holding public offices, choosing their own partners, participating in politics etc..
They should be banned from pretty much any institution where they can exercise their mindless opinions or choices that could bear an influence the societal structure. Be beautiful, take care of the family and shut up.
Why normies are the biggest cucks on the planet
There is literally no other way around it; normans are literally the biggest cucks on the planet. They will accept to be in the most degenerate relationship ever just to get a feel of being less desperate and miserable than they already are, even though the cum dumpsters they are with are only with them solely because the norman cucks provide for them. Here is a list why normans are huge cucks:
• Normans are okay with their partners not being virgins.
• Normans are okay with their partners having multiple amounts of sexual encounters with random men.
• Normans are okay with seeing their partner getting fucked by Chad/Tyrone as he pathetically jacks off to it like the cuck he is.
• Normans are okay with their partners not doing various sex acts with them because its "uncomfortable", even though the cuntrags have done despicable things with Chad/Tyrone.
• Normans are okay with getting into a polyamorous relationship because they are afraid their bitch of a partner will leave them if they don't.
• Normans are okay with their partner talking with other men.
• Normans are okay with their partner having male friends.
• Normans are okay with their partner still being friends with its ex.
• Normans are okay with getting into a relationship with a single mother and raising Chads/Tyrone's spawns as his own.
• Normans are okay with their partner having crushes on other men.
• Normans are okay with their partner talking about its crushes with its femoid friends.
• Normans are okay with their partner flirting with other men. As the cuck brushes it off as "harmless" behavior.
• Normans are okay with their partner masturbating to pictures/videos of Chad/Tyrone, which is basically virtual cuckoldry.
• Normans are okay with their partners being bisexual cunts who actively engages in sex with their own femoid kind.
• Normans are okay with their partner going out with its femoids friend on a "gurls night out".
• Normans are okay with their partners being on degenerate social media applications.
Daily life of an inceltears user (male).
Wake up in the same room as wife and wife's boyfriend.
Get up from the cardboard bed on the floor with a bunch of pillowcases and newspapers.
Approach the king sized bed where wife and boyfriend sleeps, and quietly wipes off the dried cum stains.
Kisses wife and catches glimpse of boyfriend who winks at the inceltears user.
Brushes his teeth and showers (hopefully, since they tell us to).
opens his fridge and has a hard time deciding which flavor of soylent to choose. Decides on flavor, but sees that wife and wife's boyfriend used them in foreplay, so he chooses his second favorite flavor.
drinks one sitting down in the kitchen while hearing sex noises from the bedroom.
takes two more bottles of soylent to work.
arrives to his boring, overlit, dry temperature office job where the front desk slut pretends to be nice.
gets to tiny cubicle where pictures of him, his wife and wife's boyfriend lie.
inceltears user goes on his office desktop and spends majority of the 8 hours browsing r/braincels , maleforeveralone , incels.me , and refreshes r/incels , incel.life and incelocalypse since they are going delusional and want to see more incel content.
Inceltears user goes on to post stupid platitudes and also whiteknights for certain users on inceltears who literally prove the incels right by talking about hooking up with chads.
Inceltears user brags about his poly relationship but hides the fact that the wife forced this and threatened him.
Inceltears user is about to lose an internet argument that HE started, and is backed to a corner filled with OKCupid studies, numerous blackpills, Tinder catfishes and of course, over two decades of experience from tons of users.
Inceltears user drinks the two bottles of soylent and "wins" the argument by saying "No wonder why you're incel."
After a hard day of stalking a bunch of male virgins and doing nothing productive at work (and complaining about incels being NEET), he goes home and hears more sex noises.
Makes spaghetti for his wife and wife's boyfriend.
Holds wife's hair while it eats the spaghetti.
Also holds wife's hair while it gives head to the boyfriend.
Inceltears user goes into bathroom and jacks itself off to arby's esque women who post on gonewild. Leaves an obligatory whiteknight comment.
Wife forces boyfriend to stay out of bedroom for a good two hours prior to sleeping so they could have sex.
Inceltears user goes on r/braincels to insult male virgins while being turned on to his wife and boyfriend getting it on. Posts on inceltears when backed into a corner and having no response to actual studies and proof that incels post, like always.
Wife and boyfriend fall asleep on king sized bed.
Inceltears user lays on his cardboard bed on the floor and before shutting his eyes and waiting for the next pathetic day of insulting male virgins, he says to himself "I might be a literal cuck and a loser, but at least i'm not a blackpilled incel."
