All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
Headline: Why are so many feminists obsessed with their genitals?
A lot of feminist stuff is associated with female genitalia. There are vagina monologues, vagina hats, vagina boats, paintings using period blood, yoghurt made out of vaginal yeast, etc.
You don't see MRAs do anything similar. Even the most extremist people in the manosphere don't do anything involving penises. The closest I've ever seen was the Wiener's Out thing in South Park, which was a parody.
I wonder why. The expected answer is that women's sexuality is oppressed and stuff, but I really don't see any social situation where penises are more appropriate than vaginas. In fact, it's the opposite: Female nudity is more socially acceptable than male nudity, whether it's in art or in real life. Women who flash their boobs or vaginas are met with cheers, while men who show their penises to people are arrested.
Granted, men do draw dicks on walls, but they don't really do it out of celebration of their masculinity, and it's considered more of a childish thing. Drawing dicks is mostly associated with juvenile humour, while the feminist vagina thing is supposedly classy and deep.
What are your thoughts?
There is nothing inherently harmful or immoral about having sex with children CMV
There are a number of arguments used by proponents of the prevailing cultural mythology on the subject:
1. Children are psychologically damaged by sexual activity
Sex is an inherently pleasurable activity- the claim that children are inherently "harmed" or "traumatized" by sex is demonstrably false, supported by no scientific research, and is essentially absurd, as children are not asexual (a point I will address later).
"The self-reported effects data contradict the conclusions or implications presented in previous literature reviews that harmful effects stemming from CSA are pervasive and intense in the population of persons with this experience. Baker and Duncan (1985) found that, although some respondents reported permanent harm stemming from their CSA experiences (4% of males and 13% of females), the overwhelming majority did not (96% of males and 87% of females). Severe or intense harm would be expected to linger into adulthood, but this did not occur for most respondents in this national sample, according to their self-reports, contradicting the conclusion or implication of intense harm stemming from CSA in the typical case. Meta-analyses of CSA-adjustment relations from the five national studies that reported results of adjustment measures revealed a consistent pattern: SA respondents were less well adjusted than control respondents. Importantly, however, the size of this difference (i.e., effect size) was consistently small in the case of both males and females. The unbiased effect size estimate for males and females combined was ru = .08, which indicates that CSA, assuming that it was responsible for the adjustment difference between SA and control respondents, did not produce intense problems on average."
Rind, Bruce & Tromovitch, Philip (1997). "A meta-analytic review of findings from national samples on psychological correlates of child sexual abuse," Journal of Sex Research, 34, 237-255.
The Rind meta-analysis is peer-reviewed, and its conclusion has not been discredited to date.
Often, when psychological damage does occur, it is not the result of the act itself, but rather the result of society's reaction to it:
Nelson's relationship marked "the happiest period of [her] life." "When I was a child I experienced an ongoing incestuous relationship that seemed to me to be caring and beneficial in nature. There were love and healthy self-actualization in what I perceived to be a safe environment. Suddenly one day I discerned from playground talk at school that what I was doing might be "bad". Fearing that I might, indeed, be a "bad" person, I went to my mother for reassurance. The ensuing traumatic incidents of that day inaugurated a 30-year period of psychological and emotional dysfunction that reduced family communication to mere utilitarian process and established severe limits on my subsequent developmental journey."
Sexologist Joan A. Nelson in Children and Sex, on her relationship with an adult cousin at 8 years of age December, 1981
In other words, if the prevailing belief was not that having sex as a child is the worst thing that could possibly happen, psychological issues stemming from childhood sexual experience would lessen drastically.
2. Children are essentially asexual
This is false. The orgasmic reflex develops in the womb:
"We recently observed a female fetus at 32 weeks' gestation touching the vulva with the fingers of the right hand. The caressing movements were centered primarily on the region of the clitoris. Movements stopped after 30 to 40 seconds and started again after a few minutes. Furthermore, these slight touches were repeated and were associated with short, rapid movements of pelvis and legs. After another break, in addition to this behavior, the fetus contracted the muscles of the trunk and limbs, and then clonicotonic movements of the whole body followed. Finally, she relaxed and rested.
We observed this behavior for about 20 minutes. The mother was an active and interested witness, conversing with observers about her child's experience.
Evidence of male fetuses' excitement reflex in utero, such as erection or ?masturbation” movements, has been previously reported.
The current observation seems to show not only that the excitement reflex can be evoked in female fetuses at the third trimester of gestation but also that the orgasmic reflex can be elicited during intrauterine life. This would agree with the physiologic features of female sexuality: The female sexual response is separate from reproductive functions and doesn't need a full sexual maturity to be explicit."
Giorgi, Giorgio, and Siccardi, Marco (1996). "Ultrasonographic observation of a female fetus' sexual behavior in utero," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 175, 3(1, part 1), 753.
"In a 1999 study of undergraduate students, 5.2% of females and 12.8% of males reported having engaged in sex play with their peers involving genital contact before elementary school, and that 1.3% of girls and 4.0% of boys had engaged in sex play involving anal/genital insertion (with objects or fingers) or oral-genital intercourse before elementary school. By the end of elementary school, the numbers increased to 29.2% for females and 32.9% for males for genital contact and 12.3 for girls and 10.1% for boys for insertion or oral sex. Very little pressure and almost no coercion were reported."
Reynolds, M.A., Herbenick, D. L., & Bancroft, J. (2003). The nature of childhood sexual experiences: Two studies 50 years apart. In J. Bancroft (Ed.), Sexual Development in Childhood (pp. 134-155). Indiana: Indiana University Press.
If children masturbate, orgasm, and have sex with each other, it is absurd to claim they are asexual.
3. Children cannot consent, and therefore having sex with children is rape, and we all know rape is harmful and immoral
Consent refers to the provision of agreement- if children are capable of initiating sexual activity, it is nonsensical to claim they cannot consent to it.
For example, in the animal kingdom, which has no taboo on childhood sexuality, sex between adult and children is common:
"Both adult males and females interact sexually with adolescents and juveniles (three-to-nine-year-olds). In fact, young females go through a five-to-six-year period sometimes referred to as ADOLESCENT STERILITY (although no pathology is involved) during which they actively participate in heterosexual mating (often with adults) but never get pregnant. Sexual behavior between adults and infants of both sexes is common - about a third of the time it is initiated by the infant and may involve genital rubbing and full copulatory postures (including penetration of an adult female by a male infant). (Biological Exuberance - 274)
Who is raping whom when the infant initiate sexual activity? Does the infant rape itself or does the adult rape the infant by not denying it sexual gratification?
3a. Children lack the ability to make informed consent
Sex is not some kind of complex and incomprehensible activity that requires a lot of knowledge to preform correctly- it is one of the simplest things in existence. Animals surely don't "understand" what sex is, yet it would be absurd to say all sex between animals is harmful or immoral.
5. This thread is disgusting and so are you.
This is not an argument.
Note that even though there is nothing inherently harmful about having sex with children, in our sex-negative culture, it very often is- see Joan A Nelson's quote above for an example. The harm did not come about from the sex itself, but from society's reaction to it- but regardless, it is still grossly immoral to risk ruining a child's life for the sake of an orgasm, even if the damage comes from iatrogenic sources.
So I'm not saying it's OK to have sex with children in this day and age- it most certainly is not. But the only reason it isn't is because of society's hysterical, unscientific, and maladaptive attitude towards this subject- if this were different, I see no reason why engaging in a harmless and mutually pleasurable activity with a child would be either harmful or immoral.
[Comment under "New SJW tactic : AHS combats "hate" by publicly laughing at an incel who is considering suicide."]
I'm not saying some rape from time to time is not justified, but certainly not to the extent /r/incels talks about it. /u/caamib is scary.
Tried to rape his mom. Now has plans to rape his daughter. But would you rather he exposed himself on Reddit, or just went on to do it in his country where nobody would care? I believe in giving degenerates enough rope to hang themselves (figuratively). I also believe in actually hanging them in some cases.
[ in response to commenters calling out an admitted female rapist]
What's she going to do? Report to campus and put a sign up and ask that every guy that she had sex with, come forward so she can apologize?
Or maybe she should run an ad in the newspaper? Go on CNN? How about a Facebook page that says "Victims of Drunken Involuntary Sex - If I Raped You, Come Forward"
Or how about going to the police station and saying "I had sex with this guy when he was drunk. However many years ago. Arrest me."
If she came on and said "Hey, I fucked a bunch of dudes when we were all sloppy drunk and I took advantage of them and I really don't care, it would be an entirely different ballgame."
But I knew girls that pretty much fucked the whole football team when they were drunk. What's your excuse for them? That every guy really wanted to fuck her or they just fucked her so they could say that "Yeah, I hit it"?
I'm not pitying her for what she did. I'm saying that there's a point in your life where you can't go back and change shit that you did. Tell us about YOUR perfect life and how YOU have never screwed up on any level. The guys could have filed charges. They could have screamed. They could have punched her in the face. Whatever.
But she seems remorseful and truly beat up, all this time later, over what she did. So how do you think she should be granted justice? Should we gut her with a sword? How about going the ISIS route and beheading her? Is that good enough to satisfy you? Or maybe a suicide vest. Blow her and her unborn child to pieces. Maybe that will make you happy.
Jesus. The blindness....
Wow, victim blaming much?
If they didn't want to be sexually violated then they should have fought harder?
If, just for example, I had committed some sex offense many years ago against some vulnerable individual and had come to regret it, would you feel the same compassion or have the same forgiveness for me?
Let's say, hypothetically, I was a former child molester and/or child porn aficionado who turned my life around.
Would you advise me just not to do it again and move on?
What do you suggest? We don't know how old OP is. Let's just say that she's 30 years old and has been out of college for 6 years now.
Should she go to the Campus or City Police where her University was and turn herself in? Should she take out the ads that I recommended earlier?
What exactly should she do? That's what I want to know.
Yeah, be pissed at her. OK. Great. She's a pathetic person for doing what she did. So let's deal with her. What do you suggest? Shotgun to the head? Should we gut that kid out her? That'll really teach her a lesson!
C'mon! What say you?
Let's be real
"The guys could have filed charges. They could have screamed. They could have punched her in the face. Whatever."
That's your idea of being real? You're a fucking creep.
I'm a creep? Ha! So which one do you recommend for her? Beheading? Or gut her with a sword? Burn her alive? Chop off her boobs?
You are the one who seems to want blood, so what do you recommend?
I say, "Let's be real about this." She's coming forward years after this happened. Yeah, it's messed up but it is what it is.
So unless you are the one willing to gut her, chop her baby to pieces, burn her or do whatever other heinous punishment you think she deserves, I will be more realistic and say that she needs to fix herself and move on. Call me fucking creepy but I bet if it was your ass that fucked up and I was the Judge, you'd be fuckin' glad to get sentenced by me. I bet your story would change.
Stop being a hypocrite. What she did was wrong. Very wrong. But unless you're going to gut her, you can sit over there and have a hot steaming cup of STFU
And btw, there are plenty of child molesters and child porn viewers who get away with it. I've seen the Jerry Springer Show and I've also know people who were abused.
If the victim refuses to turn the perpetrator in, or testify against them, you are still faced with the same problem.
Let's just say that I'm an atheist and at this point, I say all they need to do is go to church and ask Jesus to forgive them and they're forgiven of their "sins". So why is this a big deal? Jesus will forgive them, why can't you?
I'm sure that the fact Trangender individuals have a suicide rate 40% higher than the general population has nothing to with it.
I legitimately don't understand people's obsession with normalising the idea of trangenderism. It's a mental illness like anorexia. You don't treat anorexia by telling people to starve themselves. You give them coping mechanisms so they can cope with the messed up pathways in their brain. Why the hell are people treating trangenderism by telling them to change their gender?
We're going to look back on this in 50 years the same way we did when we treated people with bipolar disorder with shock therapy. It's absolutely ridiculous. These people need help. Feeding their problem is not helping.
The Rose McGowan thing pushed me over the edge as well. Seeing her get screamed down was my turning point. I’ve pandered to trans people because I have been afraid to do otherwise, and my liberal guilt has definitely helped push me into it. I’ve always felt that it is important to listen to other people and honor their feelings because feelings do count and I don’t like being hurtful to others, but I had a hard time admitting to myself that I was being emotionally manipulated by people who were “literally” this and that, and I can’t take it anymore.
I also noticed that my behaviors and tastes were being actively influenced by the cult of trans supremacy. I was browsing the bookstore and didn’t even want to pick up feminist texts about women because I was afraid to be perceived as anti-trans. I certainly didn’t want to purchase a book and risk upsetting a cashier. My liberation and education, especially where feminism is concerned, has stopped. Discovering gender critical feminism has been extremely eye opening and I’m really excited by it, but I don’t even know where to begin.
I’ve been reading other posts on this page and I’m absolutely blown away by the ardent and rational intellects you all have. I’m so glad that I’ve hit the tipping point.
Why do you boast in evil, O mighty men. The goodness of the LORD endures forever. But your tongues devise destruction, like a sharp razor, working deceitfully. You love EVIL more than good, lying rather than speaking righteousness. You love all devouring words, you and your deceitful tongue. GOD WILL LIKEWISE DESTROY YOU FOREVER; HE shall take you away and pluck you out of your dwelling place, and uproot you from the land of the living. The righteous also shall see and fear, and shall laugh at him saying, "here is the men who did not make GOD their strength, but trusted in the abundance of his riches, and strengthened themselves in their wickedness". But I am like a green olive tree in the house of God; I trust in the MERCY of GOD forever and ever. I will praise You forever , because YOU HAVE DONE IT; and in the presence of Your saints I will wait on YOUR NAME, for it is good. PSALM 52 The FOOL has said in his heart "There is no God" You have deceived yourselves. It is not too late to turn from this wickedness. Repent and turn to the Lord. He is FULL of mercy and forgiveness. You are resisting HIM! Think of righteousness, compassion, peace, joy and love. Call upon His name while it is still called " Today". DO NOT continue to harden you heart. Think of ETERNITY. You KNOW how this ends. DO NOT REGRET THIS FOREVER...."weeping and gnashing of teeth"
Feminism has a lot of flaws, but probably its biggest one is its devaluing of femininity.
Men are designed to be big and strong and to work, producing, providing, and protecting. Women are designed to produce and nurture children. Humanity needs both to survive.
It makes all the sense in the world that a race should have these two roles, and that they are very different from each other, but also very complementary to each other. It makes all the sense in the world that each piece should desire the other, which is exactly what happens.
Problems occur when one role is publicly degraded and labelled inferior to the other, and those designed for that role are encouraged to evaluate themselves in terms of the opposite role.
This is what feminism is doing to women.
(Title: "It's important for this community to realize the Holocaust was a hoax.")
What an arch-fabrication it is, what degree of absolute treachery, one that exceeds all limits of human deceit and corruption, that is this claim that there was an actual Holocaust against European Jews. It was a Holocaust which supposedly occurred during World War II, where Jews were not only targeted, for instance, for displacement and deportation but also gassed and burned to death, ‘because of their faith.’ It’s all a fake. Who can prove otherwise? See the real nature of WWII-era European Jewry. They were never oppressed. Rather, they were the great oppressors of the land in every way conceivable:
In his interview with Ernst Zundell, the scholarly R. Dommergue, Jewish professor, said it was a total fake. He proved prophetic and died a man of absolute truth.The Professor had sound reason for his position. According to official Red Cross records the numbers of people, all people, who died in German concentration, actually, work or holding camps, was some 270,000. That’s throughout the entire war, including those who died of communicable diseases such as typhus (rampant towards the end of the war) and cholera. What happened to the six million? Where were they killed? If they didn’t die, as is obvious, in the holding camps, then, what happened to them? Moreover, since there weren’t even six million Jews in all of Europe at that time, then, how did the extras die? Did they import them from Khazaria? Yet, wait a minute. It can’t be. Really, the Germans didn’t target the Jews after all? Weren’t those Nazi’s exceedingly brutal? Sure they were, right. In times of war the Germans were the barbarians. Despite this claim history vindicates them. Instead, it was the arch-cruel and terminally corrupt Khazars who proved to be the true barbarians and who were responsible for the mass slaughter of the innocent, including mass killings in Germany, Russia, Poland, and more. The Zionist criminals used the war as the leveraging point to drive their plot home, which was the near complete imperialistic conquest of Palestine. The social strife they created led to the basis for mass emigration of European Jewry from their homes to Middle Eastern land. Without the war, an occupied Palestine would have never occurred. It was also the means by which well-placed Zionists and also low-level operatives could enrich themselves through theft, not only of the land of the Palestinian people but also through the usurpation of the assets and wealth of European nations. So, Hollywood-style Jewry imposed the fake: upon the whole, unsuspecting world.
“Boo-hoo, poor Jews. See what happened to them. Just because they were Jews they were tormented, tortured, killed, even gassed alive.” Sure they were, right. Plenty of evidence for it, too.
There is no need to revise anything. The facts are already there. It is merely a matter of republishing the information or uncovering it, then disseminating it. Facts are facts. Equally, fakes are fakes. The fact is there was no Holocaust against European, even Russian, Jewry. That was a hoax. What is fact is that it was both European and Russian Jewry who committed the Holocaust: against the gullible, vulnerable goy and the equally gullible, vulnerable Islamic people. It was they who paid the price in blood and far, being subjected to great tyranny in the land – the real victims of any ‘holocaust,’ not the Zionists. How much control has been exerted, how much money stolen, how many funds/assets purged, all because of a treacherous, arch-Zionist lie. It’s the lie of the Holocaust, and it is a “fake,” just as Professor Dommergue had made so abundantly clear. Zundel, among others, is not the anti-Semite. The anti-Semites are the Zionists, proven by their treachery, their plots, their schemes, and their actions.
Asian guys admits: "My beautiful Chinese girlfriend gets approached by some American men and they say. 'But your boyfriend has small penis. Trust me. I'm better than him.'". WMAF is built on hatred & disrespect. ALL WMAF contributes to this. Which is why no WMAF should be given the benefit of doubt
(NAITNC)
This is why we need more Jeremy Longs out there. The vast majority of white men = ~ 5 inches. This is proven shit. https://calcsd.bitballoon.com/
The only reason WM think like this and say that shit is because porn forms their opinions. The reality is, most WM are small as shit compared to porn stars. I wonder which group has a more accurate frame of reference regarding this, WM whose source of info = porn, or gay men and promiscuous women who consistently say that most men are average, with no racial distinctions by size.
Then again, there's really no difference between WM benefiting from the exclusive use of hung guys in porn, and their benefiting from the top 1% men in Hollywood representing them. It's just sad that the general public is too impressionable to see through this subtle form of propaganda.
(asian-man-throwaway)
The average for white men is 5 inches, not the median. There's a difference ??
So while a significant amount of white men have average length penises, it's probably not the "vast majority" (even though it probably is a normal distribution).
My point is that for every white guy with a big penis, there's one with a micropenis. And while I obviously can't prove it, I'm more inclined to believe it's white guys with tiny penises who shit on Asian men the most so that, in their heads, they're at least better than somebody. So think about that the next time you see a white guy talking about Asian penises.
(8MonkeyKing)
If it's a white guy, standard answer should be "if I wanted a big penis, I would go with a black guy so no thank you". Let's see how these racist WMs deal with that. Use their own stereotypes against them.
(WuKaiHo)
Okay can we get some constructive discussions out of this post? What would be the correct methods for the Asian guy to respond in these situations?
(jermul714)
What I do is casually but publicly challenge them to whip their dick out so that we can compare penis right there, but require it has to be in front of everyone to verify the account. This can go one of two ways, either they accept your challenge or don't.
If they accept the challenge, then maybe you win, maybe you lose. If you're packing anything even close to average, then you will just be living up to what people expected anyways, and at least you had the confidence and balls to challenge them. Remember that confidence and the willingness to defend oneself are much more attractive than a big dick. But fortunately, I've never actually had to do this because...
They 100% always decline the challenge. Think about it. It's a lose/lose proposition for them. To them it's akin to playing basketball against a girl. When you beat a girl in basketball, it's nothing special because you were SUPPOSED to win. But if you LOSE to a girl, that is straight mortifying (at least to a person who overcompensates by talking about other peoples dicks). And if the Asian guy is so willing to compare his junk against yours in public, maybe he's packing something to be afraid of. Every single time the offender called me some sort of crazy, but the people who witnessed my challenge knew I wouldn't put up with that kind of shit and would always be left wondering what size my dick really is.
disclaimer: I always made sure I would only challenge this way against those I knew who would decline. Some dudes are crazy or inebriated enough to accept the challenge, so don't be reckless if this kind of thing would embarrass you. Read body language and social cues. The key part is the challenge anyways, and there are plenty of other ways to challenge people that don't involve you actually whipping your cock out. Recognize this for what it is, a war of words. No penii ever actually cross tips in the war of words (pun intended), but Asians are often losing by not even showing up to the fight.
(bionicj1052)
I believe behind all this bullshit of Asian men have small penis, white men is most afraid of Asian men(intelligent, wealth, mostly grown up in steady family, etc) in society, small penis shit is only thing they can say to put Asian men down.
(guitarhamster)
Even IF whites have bigger dicks (which they dont according to statistics), if that is the only thing they can offer, that is pretty sad. Also what woman would actually leave her boyfriend for another guy just because of dick size? Lol
(redmeatball)
white men are obsessed with asian penis. I wonder why that is?
(whitemoddetector)
This is why when you speak to AF, you have to talk shit about WM to remind them of thier faults (in certain situations only) Talking shit is a two way street, do it back
(evilsalesguy)
Asian need to rock the boat more, I got the small penis stereotype in college on a few occasions from people I don’t even know. So now, every time I talk about white, i mentioned that they are psychopaths. If the white dude is in Asian, I would add loser or pedophile in there.
(whitemoddetector)
In Jt trans article he literally had a woman in his arms, and a white guy went up to him and said "what are you doing with this Asian guy with a small penis" he got cockblocked right there and the woman left him. This is the type of shit you have to deal with so you better learn to talk shit back. No woman will stand by a silent push over. WM are actively preventing women from being with you so do it back. It's a no brainer
That graph that he included at the beginning of the video which showed that virtually all black conservatives and most Hispanic conservatives voted for Obama was pretty damning for anyone pushing civic nationalism on the right. As AH stated, that graph clearly shows that blacks and Hispanics care more about race than ideology. It's really only White people, including White conservatives, who try to be colorblind when they vote.
The implications of that graph are pretty obvious: non-Whites are trying to overthrow White dominance of this country. While that might benefit them in the short term, it's obviously not going to benefit us, or even the country since we Whites have clearly proven that we're extremely good at developing and maintaining highly successful societies, whereas brown and black people have proven themselves to be incapable of creating the types of highly successful societies that people want to move to and live in.
Maybe this non-White takeover of America would be able to maintain or even surpass the high level of development created by White Americans if only East Asians or the intellectual elite of the low-IQ races were flooding into America, but the massive influx of dregs from the 3rd world are eventually going to drag us down into the type of societal dysfunction that you see in countries like Brazil. And since most of the studies that looked at the effects of ethnic diversity showed that ethnic diversity has a net negative effect on society, then maybe even high-IQ mass non-White immigration won't be workable because it transforms a high-trust homogeneous society into a low-trust heterogeneous society which is afflicted with extremely destructive tribal identity politics.
One has to wonder what exactly our leaders and even these non-White immigrants themselves are thinking in relation to the long-term effects of mass non-White immigration. The desire to fuck over the White race makes sense for both the anti-White left and the average person of color that's still butthurt over colonialism and the era of militant White Supremacy. But for the White leftists and non-Whites that are motivated by a desire to increase the living standards of these non-White immigrants, don't they realize that turning America into Brazil will suck for everyone? Wouldn't you rather live in a highly advanced White society as a minority that treats you humanely rather than in a borderline 3rd world country like Brazil?
I mean, I can imagine myself as a black, Hispanic, or Arab person moving to Sweden and enjoying living in a highly successful White society as a minority. But I wouldn't support flooding Sweden with millions of low-IQ brown and black people because then you'd completely ruin that society and fuck over your own standards of living as well. Do non-Whites and White leftists really hate us that much? Are they really willing to harm their own standards of living in order to tear down the White race?
By the way, that entire video was amazing. I'm already angry in anticipation of such an interesting voice eventually getting censored one day.
First of all, who gives a shit what groups he belong to? He was a nutcase. And the left tells us again and again that we shouldn't judge groups by the actions of their most radical members. The only response to them should be to point out their hypocrisy.
Second, this does fit a crazy theory I have about jews. I don't think there is a grand jewish conspiracy or anything like that. For one thing it's already well established jews are severely inbred and have a much higher rates of mental illness. Which this shooter clearly had.
But also I think they have a personality type that makes them much more likely to join radical political movements. Look how many of the notable communists were jewish. Today communism is basically dead so they are way overrepresented in stuff like feminism (I had a similar image to that one for feminists but I can't find it.) I have a study that shows jews have maybe up to a standard deviation or more higher "openness" than non jews. Which is a personality trait no one really understands, but correlates with political views very well. And is highly heritable.
Centuries ago, Europeans that had similar personality types probably joined religion and became celibate monks and priests. And bred those traits out of the white population. Whereas jewish rabbis had large families.
Cancel your cable!
For fuck sakes, this morning I came over to visit my elderly mom and she happens to have her TV on. And there is one commercial that came on, it's the goddamn jewelry bullshit from people's. How convenient for them come around especially V-Day coming up. Very rare when that particular commercial comes on any other days. It's like society trying to shove this shit down our throat, reminding us. "Hey hey hey!, step on right up, lookie here, for $800 you can make yo girl happy on v-day.its a special time to show that society cares about wimmin" and guess what I don't see any of commercials that directed to women, such as tools, video games, snowblowers or sex
Glad that I don't have cable. And i have no means of any social medias on the internet. Kill that shit off. Just fade into the shadow, mgtows.
(Hal27005)
Complaint at work for being too ‘robotic’
My boss pulled me aside and mentioned that somebody had complained to his boss that I was robotic and unfriendly, not a team player, etc, and did I know what that was about?
I knew instantly who this ‘anonymous’ person was. A woman that had been transferred to our department three months previously. Who has asked me several times to ‘help’ her, which meant do the work for her. Who has tried to tag along with me to lunch. Who has asked me several times if I’m seeing anybody. I don’t know if she sees me as a potential mate to branch to or a beta that will do her dirty work, but either way I’ve always stonewalled her.
I told my boss I had no idea what was going on and if he could provide me with concrete examples I would be more than willing to have a discussion about it. He told me to forget about it, and to cover my ass in the future if this comes up again.
Time to start taking thorough notes.
(Mechnasty)
I dunno about you, but in my book that's a declaration of war. I'd be plotting to get her ass fired by any means necessary. I don't play that shit.
(heheitwontwork)
A saw a post on TRP like this where she went on a 2 month business trip to Germany, they hired a temp, temp did a great job and the OP promised the temp it wasn’t a temp job. The lady was going to be coming back from her trip to take her job back, this new girl broke down and the boss man had feelios for her. Let her stay and transferred the other girl to a different branch. Pretty fucking awesome.
(ZcytheP)
cold-blooded, I like that, the veins of men these days are pumped not of blood and iron, but instead hot chocolate and bluepill Yes, you can quote me on that.
(MGTOWstic)
Document everything.
I've had these issues before. Keep a daily log of your interactions and write it down while it is fresh in your mind, ideally you have witnesses. When the boss or HR wants to know WTF the problem is you will have a written and corroborated record. Keep it professional. Don't use any mitigated language. Say exactly what you mean when dealing with the individual. Treat her as an equal which is to say... expect her to pull her own load in the name of equality. She will sink her own ship since she probably got her education or job via the blow job route.
She will soon discover that capitalism is the great equalizer.
(Figg1778)
You’d think with all the #MeToo stuff getting out of hand that: A, bosses would be more alert to this sort of stuff. And B, that women would reign in this kind of behaviour.
Who has asked me several times to ‘help’ her, which meant do the work for her. Who has tried to tag along with me to lunch. Who has asked me several times if I’m seeing anybody.
This is blatant harassment, and she’s doing it on a constant basis.
It’s a shame you didn’t document any of it, so start now. And if your boss doesn’t help even with the proof, it might be an idea to mention to him that you’re planning on swing a solicitor to look at what options you have concerning her.
(rationalthought314)
And B, that women would reign in this kind of behaviour.
a lot of them can't because that would require rational thought
two mature and consenting adults who are of able mind and legal age to consent
In some countries gays are called fags, and treated in the same way as pedophiles (faggotry is criminally prosecuted, fags are shamed by general population). Yet, just as pedophiles, fags can't help themselves, regardless of the law and moral qualms.
forced encounter between a grown adult and a child.
I've seen CP, and, based on my "research", most ****** seem to be genuinely into it, there is nothing forced about it. Some are not. You can say that pedophiles are taking advantage of ******** , and ******** can't consent, but it is rarely forced.
I can't help but wonder how much of the damage attributed to sexual abuse is made by the good samaritans telling the ******* how "wrong" and "dirty" it was post factum.
So you are arguing that children are not forced to be in child pornography, but are in fact choosing to be? "rarely forced" - you genuinely believe this?
Yes, in most cases I observed on video, "forced" would be totally inappropriate term. The word you are looking for is "manipulated". They are genuinely excited, and they like what's going on.
30% of CP is made by ****** anyway, try your mental acrobatics to explain who's the victim here.
Children obviously do engage in sexual exploration. Which is different from being sexually abused. What I was questioning was your assertion that they genuinely enjoy being raped on camera, in many cases by a parent. There is a lot of testimony to be found on the internet, from victims of sexual abuse, describing how their abusers threatened and beat them into acting as if they enjoyed themselves on camera. I've included only one of many articles:
I'll ask you again: do you really believe that these raped and violated children were enjoying themselves? You don't have to be honest with me, but be honest with yourself - if you can.
Nobody enjoys getting raped, on camera or not. ****** that get raped don't enjoy it. On the other hand, some 5 y.o. giving a head to her dad often enjoys it. Think (I know, it's hard for you, but try it for once), why wouldn't she? She loves her dad, she spends time with her dad, they play fun games, and nobody told her that it is bad yet. For her, sucking his dick is no different from scratching his back. She sees that her dad enjoys it, and it makes her enjoy it too.
I don't say it's good, I don't say it will not damage her in the future, I'm just stating the facts. The facts don't give a fuck about how you feel about them, they just are
I can see bad acting from a mile away - in adults. I can detect when most adults are lying, or scared.
You implying that I can't see when a ***** is pretending (which I've seen in some videos - ****** scared and acting for camera), and when he genuinely likes what's going on is just laughable.
The funny thing is, they are not only shamed for having these urges, they are punished for trying to fight their urges.
Like, if you are a pedophile, and want to have a fap material to keep your sex drive low, it will get you in prison. You will also lose all friends, and your mom will make a post on reddit saying she wants you to die. Nice.
Criminalizing CP made it so. hard to find that it's just easier to go and molest a real kid.
the children in CP ARE "real children". are you actually making an argument for the legalization of child porn?
It's already shot, destroying the footage helps no one. I totally support tracking the author and cutting his balls off, but downloading CP is a victimless crime.
A child is revictimized every time those pictures are shared.
Yeah, because he somehow senses every HTTP request, even in his sleep.
We allow gore, we allow /r/watchpeopledie, just for amusement. We don't care what the family of the people who died think about it.
If decriminalizing CP will reduce abuse of other children, I'm all for it.
A child is victimized when those pictures are taken.
Honestly, it seems like at least in some cases child is victimized by people telling him he was victimized
I've been punched, stolen from and verbally abused by gypsies, and by the looks of things it's happened to a lot of people who've had to put up living near them. I don't see many other groups of people causing trouble as much as this bunch.
As for the argument of "well, we hate them so they have no incentive to integrate"... well, what about every other minority that has integrated with our society, that Britain has had a less than amicable relationship with in the past? Historically the British enslaved Africans, disliked the Jews and colonised India. All three groups are now pretty well integrated in to society, because their culture doesn't revolve around being terrible people.
Baha'ism is not a neutral ideology -- from its innate globalist nature that advocates a "world government" to its "prophecies" that designate Iran as the source and center of this globalization which, in turn, makes proselytization a necessity for them, to its insistence on abrogating Iran's majority religion of Islam, to its headquarters in Haifa of all places in the planet -- it is a political movement that is innately and inevitably anti-Iranian.
Ever since its Babist roots in Amir Kabir's era and its ties to the British Empire, Baha'ism has been used as a vehicle for foreign imperial powers to impose imperial edicts through an artificial minority over the real majority. It has a history of service to foreign interference and working against national interests in Iran. Today, the American Empire similarly uses Baha'is in various positions (such as Bani Dugal in the UN) to issue its own imperial edicts. In other words, Baha'ism has always been a fifth column.
Baha'ism has broken its covenant with Iran and it needs to do a lot to deserve being brought back in the fold. You cannot say you are a Baha'i and stand with Iran or Muslims when your entire ideology is designed to destroy both.
I live in the USA and for most of my life have been in the poverty class. Gypsies will steal and rip you off in any way that they can. They often times will show up selling pipe dreams or fake drugs or their sister or anything to make a quick buck.
They look for the young and newly homeless to try to exploit because they don't know how harsh the world can be.
I knew a young couple who gave their whole tax return to a gypsy for a car that had a blown head gasket. They were homeless and without any real experience.
Never do business with a gypse. they will burn you.
I would like to begin by acknowledging that life in Iran is no picnic. Their government is probably one of the most clueless in the world. I also admire those who, against all odds, get their family out of oppressive countries and into free nations with better future opportunities.
/ Having said that, according to numerous Iranian bahai sources, the majority of Iranian baha'is who escape Iran lied about their lives being in danger there. While a handful of baha'is are in fact wrongfully prosecuted in Iran, the vast majority who escape are not in any danger.
/ baha'i families hire coaches to teach them how to lie to the UN; claiming they were arrested and their lives were threatened. They learn to describe the inside of the jail, prosecution techniques, etc.
/ Also, anytime a baha'i is arrested for any crime, the LSA immediately announces that he or she has been arrested for being a baha'i. Same thing when a baha'i dies for any reason; they claim he was secretly killed by the government for being a baha'i and all the baha'is claim to have been related to the deceased.
Asian females lack curves generally speaking and they look like Aliens with those mongoloid eyes. The self-hate is justifiable. The only reason I can see a white man dating one, is for the extra experience and sex or simply because he can’t get a nice white female. This said some do look bangable (Especially Japanese girls in stockings).
Good point overall. White people in general wouldn't quickly marry outside their race. The only reason this multi-racial cacogenic cancer gets propagandized 24/7 is because a bunch of ugly Turkic Khazars centuries ago frequently raped Europeans and especially a lot of Eurasian-Caucasians in their region while becoming talmudic-Jews to feel extra special as chosen rape-babies of ugly Turkic fucks while mingling with the incoming inbred immoral unwanted Jews from various nations to their empire as well, while later immigrating to European nations in hordes – some before and also after the destruction of their empire. While all becoming inbred eventually while simultaneously being a completely mongreilzed race - the history of Ashkenazim - the chosen ones.
If I was ET, I wouldn't necessary despise asian men, but I sure as hell wouldn't think highly of or respect asian men.
I mean, you don't see the poor as hell iraqi arabs and afganistani pashtun allowing white sex migrants going there to fuck underage child prostitutes or sex holidays bc they can't get laid in their own countries.
Feminism has always been about women gaining political power so they can fuck over nuclear families, men, and feminine women. Feminism hates these three core subjects because:
Nuclear family: It represents all that they cannot have. Feminists tend to be unpleasant, both in manner and face, therefore they cannot land a good man with whom to start families with. Instead they rot in a filthy apartment, surrounded by cats and empty wine bottles.
Men: Feminists hate men, regardless of the "feminism doesn't hate men" meme. They all secretly hate masculinity, male nature, etc, because it is male nature to go for pretty, feminine girls, and feminists are anything but. Unable to land themselves a hunk, they are instead surrounded by cats and male feminists, which all women hate instinctively, feminist or not.
Feminine women: Feminists believe that feminine women have stolen everything from them, whether it be the modelling jobs or marriage-worthy men. That is why they do everything in their power to screw over feminine women, such as attempting to ban adverts featuring pretty women under the guise of "objectification", when in reality they are just jealous of being reminded of what they do not have: a rockin' hot body. This has recently become public knowledge by the "banning grid girls" incident, which involved feminism campaigning against "female objectification" until finally the grid girls were fired. This goes against the feminist narrative of wanting more women to acquire work, because feminism has kicked women out of work.
As you can see, the entire movement is just a giant shit-storm of insecurity, and it reeks of it.
Convincing people to kill themselves
AryanBlood:Am I the only one here when they see someone depressed or suicidal feel the need to see if you can convince them to do it, I don't mean just on an internet post. It's something about the fact you know can use words to twist someones problems into something worse then it really is, I guess a power and control related issue. Killing is easy, but convincing someone to kill themselves is on a level of its own.
stuffweknowabout:I like pushing them to their limits and making them see what I can see: That they do not want to kill themselves at all, that it's just "a cry for help", that they are not even capable of doing that
PurpleUnicornPotato:
I like to do both. It's fun to make someone kill themselves, but it's also fun to see if you can stop some people. Sometimes it's harder to make someone not kill themselves than it is to make them do it. I like to take the greatest challenge.
she's already whitewashed and if she's whitewashed while being pure blooded korean with korean immigrant parents in a korean populated neighborhood. she's truly already beyond fucking lost and it's her father's fault. what korean father puts his daughter into snowboarding? her profile says shes fluent in korean, but try to find one interview where she speaks it. ( i won't hold it against her for not speaking korean, but don't put it out like you do)
I deserve financial compensation
From the government. I want to sue for 10 million dollars. What I am going through is much worse than what that guy who got dragged off the plane went through (and he got millions). Heck, you can get in a car accident and get a little injured then sue for psychological distress for 10s of thousands of dollars. But where is my money? I want to sue the government for not providing me with a reasonable opportunity to get sex or a relationship.
I have been trying to get a gf for the past 6 months but it is impossible to meet girls, and the few I met none of them worked out.
I tried online dating, it sucks balls. Girls reply, but then they stop talking due to 80/20 rule. Once they start talking to me a chad messages them then they lose interest. I have messaged over 100 girls, maybe 30 replied (which is actually a pretty fucking high reply rate which proves theres nothing wrong with my looks yet it goes to show you just how the 80/20 rule is in place.. I mean I am pretty decent looking but I am not 8/10 or higher). And of those I have been spending hours per day on them, only to have them ghost on me. It is such a fuckng frustrating and anxiety provoking feeling: talking to a girl, putting HOURS of effort, sometimes weeks... thinking EVERY message she sends you will be her LAST, then suddenly one of her messages DOES become the LAST OUT OF THE BLUE AND WITHOUT WARNING AND NOT BASED ON WHAT YOU WROTE... it is like skipping a step. It sucks balls. Fuck this shit. It has given me major anxiety and nervousness and is causing me to me physically ill. But I have no choice... this is my only way to meet girls. So far only ONE girl has been talking to me for over a week and I went on a date with her which went perfectly but even she is stalling with the 2nd date... I have a feeling she is giving me excuses because she is stalling every time I bring up the 2nd date.. I have a feeling she too is being messaged by a chad. Well can you fucking blame me when this happened with EVERY SINGLE GIRL I talked to so far? I am a pretty decent looking guy, I am smart, witty, funny, social, etc... I don't know why it has to be like this. Fuck this shit.
My psychological distress is MUCH worse than people who sued for MILLIONS. I deserve at least 10 million, relatively speaking. You want to be progressive? Well fucking pay me 10 million then. Or just get rid of 3rd wave feminism and bring back patriarchy so I could get a girlfriend.
For the past 3 weeks I have been talking to this girl and every time my phone vibrates and there is a message from her I start feeling nauseas and getting sweat hands.. like.. is THIS gonna be the message that stabs me in the throat YET FUCKING AGAIN CONSISTENT WITH THE PAST FUCKING 30 GIRLS HOWEVER I HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE because it is the only fucking possible way of possibly ever fucking getting a girlfriend I am almost fucking 30 fuck this motherfucking shit I just want this nightmare to end I just want to have ONE fucking relationships I just want to have sex ONCE with a girl just so I can know what it is like so I can fucking get on with my life I hate this fucking feeling of playing catch up every single day with everythign on the line fuck you motherfucking normies you don't know how bad incels ahve it yo fucking weak ass pussies wouldn't last a day in our shoes motherfuck you. fuck you.
Happy MGTOW day brothers!
By choosing to celebrate MGTOW day, you saved yourself $150 on a dinner at a ridiculously over-priced restaurant. $60 on a bottle of champagne/wine. $20 on a bouquet of flowers. $30 on cab/uber. You probably also saved $100 on new clothes, $50 on a pre-date haircut and shave. You must certainly saved yourself from getting stood-up, spending on a thot who might never sleep with you and false rape allegations. Countless other benefits.
May this lifestyle grow so big that we officially replace V-day with MGTOW day on the calendar. Cheers!
Evolutionary Theory vs Universal Common Descent
Evolutionary Theory is about the change in heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations.
Universal Common Descent is about the monophyly of life, i.e., how every organism we observe today shares a common ancestor: single celled organisms that developed from primordial goo.
While it is true that accepting Universal Common Descent requires accepting Evolutionary Theory, why do so many people think that accepting Evolutionary Theory requires accepting Universal Common Descent? Creationists can believe God created as He described in Genesis, while believing God built into His creation natural mechanisms for organisms to adapt.
This is depressing as all hell. But even as a dyed in the wool leftist, I would consider casting my vote with a right wing party like the Tories to prevent self-ID / the Gender Recognition Act update from going into place. If the Tories were to back away from it fully, as Justine Greening seemed to be doing, I would definitely think long and hard about voting for them even though I loathe everything else they stand for...
That said, chances are quite high that I would still opt to simply spoil a ballot given that choice, rather than vote for the right wing, but I would definitely have to really think hard. I am sure that many women who are not as left wing would find it a no-brainer though.
Once self-ID goes on the books, it will stay there possibly forever. As much as Tory policies surrounding health care, Brexit, welfare, employment legistlation, and basically everything else are a flaming garbage fire, most of that could be reversed by a Labour party under new leadership that's had some sense smacked into it by the desertion of women it caused with its misogynistic behavior.
(TRAs is a TERF term for transgender activists.)
It's a very common tactic for TRAs to claim that they aren't doing/saying the thing that they are doing/saying before everyone's very eyes.
I have seen internet debates where they will say something outrageous and then in the next breath claim that they never said the thing that they said five seconds ago, and the person who called them out on it is just a crazy fantasist. It's the same tactic that all gaslighters and emotional abusers use.
Expecting a good faith debate or even a consistent position from them is foolhardy. We are dealing with a political movement that is based on male dominance and extreme narcissism - of course they are going to use the tactics of narcissists and abusers when advancing their political agenda.
The philosophy of not caring
As men, by our nature we have the compelling need to care. About our children, our jobs, our siblings, our parents, our wives/girlfriends, our friends. Men have an innate desire for loyalty.
Back in the day a man could care with no ill will or detriment towards him. But since we live in a gynocentric society, our cares aren't worth a flying fuck. Nothing you want matters to anyone, society views men as disposable. I refuse to be seen as disposable. I have no problem putting others first if it is reciprocal. However, I'm not a piece of trash. I refuse to be tossed out.
It's been a hard journey, but I've been learning to detach myself from the world and not give a fuck about anything: sexism, lgbt, politics I don't care. Simple as that. What's honestly better in life than to go home, drink a beer or your choice liquor, kick up your feet and listen to music or watch hbo or enjoy the nature outside.
The key to fulfillment is to not care about anyone but yourself and your brothers.
Now to the reasons you paged me. I like to jerk off to CP from time to time. Underage girls placed in a sexual context become sexually attractive to me. Not posing naked (that does nothing), but the actual sexual stuff. I just love how pure and strong their emotions are, this is the main attraction to me.
The second thing I love about CP is the idea of corrupting children. It fuels my fantasy, and makes my faps better.
Third thing is that I feel like I missed a lot in life not being more sexually active when I was a child. CP helps me re-visit the fantasy world of my own childhood. Better faps.
Hell no. I still can't believe people are not making this shit up just for attention. "I was raped 10 years ago by my boyfriend, I'm so traumatized".
Fuck, really? You had sex when you didn't wanted sex, with your favorite fuck buddy no less, and now you are traumatized for life? Did he ripped you vagina or something? Prostitutes have sex with unattractive men every day, and somehow they are fine, but you, stupid attention whore, are traumatized for life? Go kill yourself.
Liberals love to say it's the white people who don't live in a multicultural society who are the most racist since they don't have their lives enriched by the vibrant toilet cultures of the 3rd world, but as someone who lives in Toronto as most of you already know I can say that this is far from the case. I don't consider myself racist but a few of my friends are definitely white supremacists and they are products of shame and self loathing of their formative years where they grew up to worship the Outliers, to smoke weed and mourn the gr8 2pac shaker. Luckily I had a decent upbringing where I was frequently mocked for dipping my toes into the sewer, so living in Tha Toylet didn't do much damage.
(The ALF is an animal rights terrorist group)
There is nothing barbaric about what the ALF does. No human has ever been hurt in an action. They do not operate if a perceived threat to human or animal is apparent. They do not attack life. They only thing being attacked is the idea that it is ok to use animals. The only thing being attacked is money of companies who abuse animals. No one is being hurt except for wallets of people who exploit the innocent.
Like the holocaust, I don’t deny the atrocities that occurred during these periods. The natives and blacks faced challenges, and they were cut a very raw deal. However, I hold the position that we as a people CAN NOT let our (notably minor) history of abuse be used against us. Anti-whites will be relentless in their berating of our race as a result of something’s we have done. Make no mistake about it: the accusations of the limitless brutality of slavery and colonialism are nothing more than attacks on the legacy of whites as conquerors, explorers, and the builders of civilization. We cannot let them use these past atrocities as a means of smearing our people’s reputation.
it doesn't matter what they identify as, the rest of the arabs, and indeed the rest of the world see them as an admixed population of arabs and black africans, which is exactly what they are. thus they won't recreate the exact same type of civilizations or cultures that the arabs, nor the non-mixed black africans, did and do
implement your own advice, and apply proper context, "means very little" in terms of direct genetic effects into the people's behaviors and thus culture, because haplogroup genetic markers are not genes, period
and with regards to the topic at hand, my comments never left that context. the descendants of those melanesians that "become assimilated' into southeast asians, will not stop having the genetic influences of their melanesian ancestors, and will like the sudanese arabs behave as an admixed population, which is precisely how the existing groups of people that have both ancestry behave currently
a group of people choosing to identify as one group over another doesn't change that groups' intrinsic genetics or culture
Nah, the demand will exist regardless of whether supply does. An addict craves their drug regardless of whether there is anyone there to sell it to them. We crave food whether our cupboards are full or empty. The only thing we can do about pedophilia is to make sure that pedophiles have a safe release valve for these impulses.
IMHO, legalizing possession of child pornography is the most ethical answer. 1) It incentivizes pedophiles to stay at home and jerk off instead of going out to rape. In my experience incentive works better than punishment, and most people will choose an easy option over a dangerous one. 2) Legalizing possession would allow police to prioritize their resources in catching the manufacturers and distributors. I would rather they go after the ones causing the MOST suffering, rather than trying to catch every bee in the hive with an individual net. 3) I have seen nothing to indicate that pedophiles are not human. I don't think they would want to harm a child any more than a straight man wants to harm women, or a gay man wants to harm men. It follows that they would likely be as disgusted by any of us to see the worst kinds of sadistic child-rape. If possession was legalized, suddenly the moral pedophiles have a way to report the sadistic rapes without risking the danger of a life sentence.
[Comments under "r/FULLFASCISM banned for proliferation of violent content"]
@Spleeniator
@Kouyate42
/r/FULLFASCISM poster here. If they've banned this subreddit then they should at least show some logical consistency and ban the likes of /r/FULLCOMMUNISM. It's not hard to find posts on there from people who want to see people brutally murdered, and whilst I know some of it is likely circle-jerking I also strongly suspect that some of them are not joking. I mean, there's people on there who'd want to see me strung up from the gallows purely for my political beliefs.
I mean, if your political beliefs advocate violence against minorities than yes, people are going to wish you harm.
Christ, at least fascists in the 30s had the balls to come out and say 'we don't like freedom of speech or you queers and commies. Come fight me.'
Now you all cower behind 'it's just my opinion' and bleat about the meanies that dont like you.
To explain the inherent difference: i want you to stop being a fascist. If you stop being a fascist I have literally no problem with you.
If fascists would just stop organising for the genocide of minorities people will stop organising for the death of fascists. And no. This is not a 'hypocritical statement', not all violence is equal, not all political violence is equal.
From Kouyate42:
Had I actually been around in the 30s I would happily have worn the brown shirt (I'm a Strasserite NatSoc), or even the black, and been an open fascist. Sadly I live in a time and in a country where such an action would be illegal.
As to the genocide of minorities, it's clear from this you've never read a single page of any fascist author. Take my own ideology of Strasserism- in Germany Tomorrow, probably the central book for Strasserism, Otto Strasser himself is clear in his denouncement of the concentration camps (I can even give you quotes if you want), of antisemitism and of Hitler's policies on Jews. He even wrote a chapter in this book called 'A Note On The Jewish Question'. Similarly British Fascist Sir Oswald Mosley never once advocated for the death of or harm to come to any minority- rather he recognised that Britain as a country possessing an empire there existed many different races and creeds which all needed their own attention. Mussolini in his earliest ideas was also dismissive of the concept of race being a concern and only adopted ideas to the contrary much later. Genocide or the discrimination of minorities is not an intrinsic part of fascism at all.
If you want me to stop being a fascist, then present me with some good arguments as to why I should change my mind. I'm an open-minded, reasonable person and with it, I will happily consider any arguments given. However you cannot whinge if I come to a conclusion you don't like or agree with- that's how freedom of opinion actually works. Far too many people and especially leftists seem to think it's a one way street where this freedom only applies if the person happens to begin agreeing with them.
I do not want my money to go to any type of charity. Is there a way I can make sure my money is not used to help people? This is such a turn off. Guess I'm gonna have to skip this title for something stupid like this.
(Note: Warning, rather graphic image in the link)
Sweden: Girl attacked with a bottle for rejecting a man groping her crotch. Attacker described as 5'10", mid-20s, dark hair, muscular build, following EU guidance to censor ethnicity. No investigation as he can't be identified. Feeling safe, Swedes? Feel like your country cares about you?
(50pointdownvote)
When you say no but your country says yes.
(garmentofpraise)
I think it's safe to say that all Swedish girls need guns.
(nato138)
I think it's also safe to say that Islam is total cancer as being raised in it clearly leads to this behavior being accepted in their "culture". Actually, in certain countries it's not even safe to say that.
(radarOrGTFO)
Or, ya know, Swedish men that are actually men and stand up for the protection of the vulnerable. If this were happening in my neighborhood, men would patrol the streets and enforce nature's law.
(Swordeater)
Ah, but the patriarchy! Can't be making the women feel weak by protecting them!
(PM_your_front_bum)
You'd like to think so.
But you aren't going to do much against the state.
You'll be arrested/shot and if you live, you'll be thrown in a cell, full of these animals for your own enrichment.
It's the kind of thing that will probably only be fixed with civil war.
(steelfil666)
Its not civil war if its against islamic intruders. Its.. a sorry cant contained it any longer, "DEUS VULT" is incoming..A CRUSADE!
(Stumpsmasherreturns)
The Islamic invasion is the symptom, the government is the problem. The men of Sweden need to find their meatballs.
(HerrBBQ)
NATO did their best to indoctrinate European boys into dickless wimps after World War II so the US wouldn't have to deal with another round of nonsense. They had good intentions, but they seriously fucked up European society because of that.
(VaderNocturnus)
Id "convert" to muslim, Build a following, Call the old muslims not "real" muslims, Start in-fighting and division, Brand original muslims as the infidels, reinterpret the entire religion, Watch islam eat itself in Europe....Government can't shun the movement because we wuz muzlums.
Sweden used to be a super power that could swing their dicks at Russia in their hay day..
Im not much for religion, But Christian values need to be reintroduced in the region, because the moral fiber of the country is so withered, Only a spiritual enlightenment could save that populace.
(marowak13)
Did she forget to wear her Swedish government issued rape prevention bracelet?
(GrinningLion)
I thought they were passing out whistles.
(marowak13)
that was ableist to people who don't have lips.
(Stumpsmasherreturns)
To be fair a good chunk of Swedish women have lost their lips what with the acid attacks...
(KekistaniCrusader115)
No, it's mandatory anti-rape hijabs. You would be safe from rape AND show women empowerment!
(feddup2)
Mid evil muslim middle age savage society treats women like slaves. What could go wrong Sweden?
(UkraineRussianRebel)
"I accepted any refugees no matter where they're from, WCGW?"
Let's post something from Sweden on r/whatcouldgowrong, would it get banned?
(Podesta_tha_molesta)
The west: "They're just like us!"
The middle east: "Aloha Snackbar!"
(Martellus732)
Sounds like she got culturally enriched against her will.
Rule of Thumb #1: if they don't mention race - assailant is probably not White. Rule of Thumb #2: if an alleged assault on a muslim/homo is in the news, it's most likely a hoax.
(UkraineRussianRebel)
Omg, are you assuming there are no dark haired, muscular, tan men in Europe? Classic Spanish tourists raping in Sweden! /s
(bahhumbugger)
Islam has always been part of Sweden! /s
(UkraineRussianRebel)
I've been to a modern art exhibition by a Swedish artist which included a classic red Swedish wooden barn adorned with Islamic symbols. At first, I thought it was a parody and sarcasm. No, the author, in the description, actually said that "this is Sweden now" and for "most Swedes, multiculturalism is more familiar than 'Swedish culture' which the 'right-wing populists' are talking about."
A Swedish barn with Islamic symbols was meant as definitely a positive thing.
(greyhoundfd)
The sad thing is I think he’s right though. The process of demoralization has been so thorough and complete in Sweden that I think many Swedes couldn’t really identify with their own culture even if they tried. The sad fact is that for many of them an Islamic state would be an improvement because currently they have nothing. Hopefully they can find a new National identity which is more Western than Islam but I have little hope.
(poldicer)
to be fair gypsies are a huge problem in europe and they aren't kebabs.
(13dimethylamylamine)
Ah gypsies. Most people think of gypsies and they think of the ones that you encounter in Italy and France... they have no idea how brutal some of them can be, especially in Central and Eastern Europe.
This is just ridiculous :D
(folderol)
Want to laugh even harder? Go to any university website and have a look at the current research projects these gender studies PhD's are doing.
The Effects of 80's Punk Rock on Latino Women in Peru Ages 25 - 50 is an example. At my local uni. it's mostly studies about women in rock music. I can't think of any gender that has affected rock music less than women. Because oppression!! No because men are better at it. Both genders have their strengths, one of men's is music. Just a fact of life and there should be no shame in that.
(Channel_Dedede)
When the people studying "biology" don't understand the basics of biology...
(cherrybombstation)
That stupid commie bitch professor Melissa Click of the University of Missouri (you remember, the "I need some muscle over here!" bitch,) did her PhD dissertation on 50 Shades of Gray. She also wrote about Twitter and Twilight's affects on millennial women's sexuality.
Missouri had the number one journalism school in the country at one point. Number one. And they were hiring social justice bitches like her to teach the next wave. Seriously, look at some of the goddamn utter drivel she has had published.
“Twitards and Tyler’s Van: Anti-fans, Twilight, and textuality.”
“Fifty Shades of postfeminism: Contextualizing readers’ reflections on the erotic romance series. In E. Levine (ed.) Feeling Feminine: Popular Culture for Women in the Early 21st Century.”
“It’s ‘a good thing’: The commodification of femininity, affluence and whiteness in the Martha Stewart phenomenon.”
Academia is a fucking tragedy now. So glad I got out
(loopymcgee)
omg, lol I work with a girl who has her Ph.D. in Feminist Studies (gag) I almost cant stand being around her. This is one degree I wouldnt want the debt from... oh, she also has a transgender daughter (born a son) who is SIX and gets embarrassed talking about how babies are made..
(need_fork_split_3)
She has a son that she abuses.
(1youlove)
That is not a coincidence that she has this degree and has a "trans" six year old. She did this to him. I would call CPS if I were you.
(FindtheOwl)
I'm aware this is a meme, however... this reminds me that the far left are sociopaths. They really don't value human life. Posturing and virtue signaling is what they are all about.
They are so conceited and self-centered they have lost the ability to 1) empathize with other humans that don't share their perspective identically, 2) admit they are wrong about anything ever, 3) be saved or salvaged
RE: Being black in America is a "disability", black law professor argues
(Skynuts)
1963: "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character"
2018: "Being black in America is a disability"
(fleebly)
So, she's arguing for white supremacy?
(lolelulalily)
white privilege = white supremacy
They've been at it this whole time.
(BasedMcCulloch)
Seriously. There are enough... um, rather dodgy individuals out there routinely citing average black IQ being in the sub-85 region that it seems, well, retarded to give them ammunition like claiming blackness is a disability.
Leftism is a mental illness. And Democrat plantation blacks are so quick to abdicate responsibility and agency that, fuck, sometimes the claim of "85" does not seem so outlandish.
(Perfection_Merchant)
Seeing this idiotic bullshit spewed by my own people is the reason I’m so disappointed in the black community. We have so much potential and when we unite together behind a good cause we have shown what we can achieve. But my own people have been indoctrinated into this bullshit.
MLK would be labeled an Uncle Tom had he existed in today’s times. It’s really disappointing, someday I hope that we can unite together and cause good for our children and our future kin. You have to pull yourself up by the bootstraps and fight for yourself. But instead most of them want to spew a political ideology that only uses them as props. Then send toxic racists like Louis Farrakhan and Al Sharpton who are only good for race baiting.
Then comes along this lady who sees only oppression. It infuriates me each and every day. But I can’t sweat it too much. I feel like Huey Freeman from the Boondocks. I’m just continually cynical and disgusted.
(j0ssv8)
But, what she leaves out is, "The disability only manifests itself while surrounded by other blacks, blacks that do not want you to succeed."
(steveryans2)
It feels very similar to how the LGBT population treats conservative LGBT folks. Blacks have to fight harder to escape their own segment of the population than anything they have to face from the world community at large. Successful black person who is making a living doing something with intellectual purpose? Sold out to the white man. It leaves them in a ponderous catch-22 in that it requires them to succeed in a broad scale, middle-class way doing rap or sports while changing nothing else. It'll never happen.
(heroofadverse)
This is an insult to the Blacks who are healthy, and ready to do honest work to earn a living. In fact, saying someone is disabled because of their race is no less a racist statement.
And this comes out from a law professor. Shame on her.
(Vanguarde2020)
I grew up with a black family next door and their oldest son out of TWELVE kids ( family on welfare, Section 8, food stamps, full free medical care, the entire package ) wanted to better himself and decided to go to college ( free, because of economic status and other factors ) to study law enforcement.
He wanted to become a police officer, and eventually a detective.
His family threw him out of the house at 17, disowned him, and never allowed him to attend their church or family holidays again.
This was a close family. VERY religious. They flat out said the did this because he “betrayed the black community by joining the enemy side”
Blacks have to stop fucking blaming others and fix their god damned family units and warped thinking. Until they do not see the police as the “enemy” they will never full integrate into society and will always play the victim card.
RE: Dem Party has gone insane. Their new position is that it's immoral to restrict any kind of immigration, from any country, in any amount, for any reason. Even enforcing our existing laws, the ones they voted for & passed in Congress, is tantamount to a hate crime. #Tucker
Just like gun-control, abortions, abominable LGBT "rights" (including pedophilia), State-Funded(single payer) Healthcare, etc., etc., they will not be happy w/whatever "compromise" is reached and will continue to their dying day fighting and imposing more and more tyrannical measures on all of us who used to be "free" until they usher in what they truly want and that is a fact.
They are not "centrist" in any way shape or form as they pretend to be only to keep moving the "center line" further and further to the left and this really will be the end of all of us if they are not 100% shutdown. There is no room for civility or true "compromise" as the "progressives" themselves have made this crystal clear time and time again
Of all the races, Native Americans are the most poorly adapted to modernity. Despite reasonably high intelligence, complex social structures, and having a unique, thriving culture, they never built any kind of civilization. In fact, their entire bloodline up until the arrival of whites, was about impermanence, not leaving any kind of permanent mark on the land. We need attitude now, and its entirely feasible to draw up laws that place large amount of land under reservation control, so that it isn't eaten up by corporations. In an ethnostate, you would have to simultaneously increase their sovereignty, as well as dependence on the US. For example, they need to have a solid, federal education system on the reservation in order to be able to move between and function in the two entities. The Red's love of and dependence on alcohol is even greater than that of the Celt, so increased federal DEA presence is a necessity. Likewise, you'd have to modify or complete get rid of certain laws that allow corporations to take advantage of things like imminent domain and tax evasion.
Anyways, during that gay app conversation, instead of reciprocating his requests for my address or for me to go to his, his unsolicited (small) cock pics and shit like that - I instead asked about his interesting "bi" designation on his profile instead of gay. He said he's bisexual obviously but that he leans more towards guys now. He told/messaged to me (unsolicited) about all his recent easy fucks/conquests with all the "easy Korean sluts" on his college campus and that he even has photos of his cock still in those Korean shithead slags (they let him take photos during sex!) - he proceeded to send them and I was so sickened then told him to stop. He then said how white chicks on his campus were too busy just trying to march for feminist causes or tried being "liberal nutjobs" whilst the Asian (Korean according to him) chicks were all over him and he said his record was (barf!) "4 Korean chicks in a single day".
[OP of "Wrong Generation"]
"I was born in the wrong generation" caption above the picture of a boy demonstrating against school integration while holding a "We won't go to school with Negroes"
