All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
If you heard of the saying "we learn from our mistakes" or "you never learn till something happens."
Just look at it you wouldn't driver a nice car in a bad part of town because you know, you know something will happen you your car.
You wouldn't brag about how much money you have on you because we all know, someone will rob you.
This leads to sluts a problem for this generation. I see way too many girl sluts out there roaming in the free with us. And despite their slut nature they haven't been raped.
I can tell you if one slut gets raped it will show her exactly what happens to women, girls, and whores; whatever you must call them if they act that way or mainly dress that way.
Because i know i learned not to touch the hot stove only after seeing what happens when playing badass and touching it guess what that was a lesson learned, i haven't touched one since.
So if sluts get raped it will send a message a powerful message to all of them to show this is what happens when you're a slut, this is what filth sluts get.
Ultimately, Transgender ideology, as it is currently being represented, should be viewed as bourgeois reactionism. The bourgeois ideals of 'real man' and 'real woman' must be preserved at any cost (the system of domination and submission depends on it, after all), even to the point of ceding that they are not natural and are entirely social constructs.
What's 'important' now, is that people conditioned to desire conformance with one or the other construct be supported in that desire. We are not permitted to look too deeply at the causes of that conditioning (pervasive drugs and pornography and the resulting decadent culture, the general BDSM economic structure of contemporary capitalism) for obvious reasons.'
"The sheer range of appetites catered to, desires that didn't exist until we invented them" - Littlefinger
Value is socially constructed, but we aren't allowed to ask whether these constructions are good for society or the individuals they affect.
The "vagina dentata". As the so-called "dissident" Feminist, Camille Paglia says: "Metaphorically, every vagina has secret teeth, for the male exits as less than when he entered. The basic mechanics of conception require action in the male but nothing more than passive receptivity in the female."
Some take the adoption of this way of thinking as being "afraid" of vagina, but it is more of a realization. Acceptance. I think the thing that truly keeps men from being unplugged from the matrix (which is another word for womb), is their death grip on their assigned, traditional sense of masculinity. Their identity, their ego, is very much attached to this sense of masculinity (Which is about performance/feigning strength, while femininity is about inaction/feigning weakness). Ironic, then, that it is this death grip on masculinity that keeps men falling back into the womb endlessly, where they exit as lesser men each time.
It is truly in women's best interest that men maintain this death-grip on performative masculinity, because it's how they continue to get a free ride.
I say all of the above knowing how unpopularly it's been received, even among MGTOW...
Pussy is the
Soft totalitarian's
Hole of choice.
Porta Guillotines
To cut your dick off
And pay with your life,
The lives of your children;
Right on down
The bloody line.
There are...
Steel bars
In that
Cooch.
After some clicking, the 'study' the author sites is an article written by vice, here. http://motherboard.vice.com/read/scientists-tried-trolling-conspiracy-theorists?utm_source=mbfb
The article essentially uses a study taken to demonstrate the effects of a social media echo chamber and twists it into an enormous generalization, by labelling people as 'conspiracy theorists' with obvious negative connotations.
It's important to distinguish between people with low capacity for critical thought, people with mental disorders which blur their perceptions of reality, and people with suspicions and alternative thoughts on a given topic.
The people who believe that JFK was murdered by a magic, bending bullet, with space aliens at the helm are in a wholly different intellectual category to those that have suspicions based on evidence that the federal reserve had some involvement.
I'm kinda drunk and in the mood to yell at stupid people.
You've probably heard of how Black men and Black women have issues with each other, however, when black men are killed by the police, you see Black women marching alongside Black men in protest. When have Asian American women shown this level of consideration for Asian American men?
Instead, you got Asian feminists bashing Asian men at every opportunity, and self-hating Asian women propagating stereotypes of Asian men.
Many Asian women have no respect for Asian men, and it's sad and astonishing that instead of being ostracized by our community, these women are tolerated or even put on pedestals for their disgusting behavior - I want no part in an "Asian community" which excludes and ignores Asian men.
I don't give a fuck about Asian females' fake problems. They like to bitch about yellow fever/objectification or how Asian men fail to "protect" them, but my ears are deaf to them. We don't owe them shit and they certainly don't have the right to speak for us or tell us what to do.
First of all, a large number of 'rapes' are the woman's fault. Here's why.
A) She spent the night drinking and brought a man home/went home with him. Her ASD was telling her that she's not about to have sex, but it might just happen that way and when she gets to a bed, something puts her off. The room is dirty. His cock is small. She realises she's a slut and that this is not how respectable or valuable women behave. It could be any or all of these or something else entirely.
Whatever the reason, she decides she doesn't want to have sex. This is where any responsible adult takes charge of their own fate and makes this known. They state this, get up and leave. She doesn't. Her bad decisions, followed by her inability to speak up, mean that Bobby McBeta has sex with her against her will without being able to know this. She does not struggle. She does not say no. Is he supposed to read her fucking mind?
B) She fucked some guy and regretted it. "Rape!" The End.
C) Actual rape.
As for "when the rapist doesn't see it as rape", bullshit. Rape is a heinous crime, and if you can rape someone and not know about it, then either (A) has occurred, or you're an extremely fucked up sociopath.
[Talking about Asian women with white men]
Girls like her are trash, perfect example of the white man's hypersexualised whore, their minds are owned by whites. They are the group I hate the most, even more than white men. I don't see them as victims of white propaganda and culture like some people do. I have a totally ruthless mentality with them that if they want to behave like whores that is their choice and they should get treated like whores. We cannot afford to favour them, we cannot afford to accomodate them.
We're not a fucking animal charity that takes back white cum drenched fuckdogs and gives them a nice home to live in and shit everywhere. They play the whole nice family girl image because they think we are stupid, many uncle Chans are fucking stupid. But are we going to be fucking stupid?
They are very insecure, because they believe that by sucking white cock they become honourary whites, even though deep down they know they are seen as disposable whores. There is no honour there, her white relatives and friends will snigger and call her dragon lady. Her sons will be virgins and her daughters will be the white man's prostitute. Weak ass mom will create weak ass children.
At the same time when they see an Asian guy demonstrate the independence and mental strength to date other races, she loses her shit because it creates a cognitive dissonance in her whorebrain. She simply cannot believe that what she sees as an inferior race (her own) can succeed despite the Nazi beliefs of American society.
FWIW, I see the offspring from AMWF as being vastly superior in background. Because you know the father is likely to be no fucking sap.
You know, I would not be against naming and shaming these girls to your friends.
Hi, I am Rob Balsamo, Founder of Pilots For 9/11 Truth. Feel free to ask me anything.
If you would like to confirm my identity, feel free to contact me through the Pilots For 9/11 Truth website, where I will be happy to speak to anyone on the phone (so long as they give me their identity), or I can make a video on youtube, or post a confirmation thread on our forum... or... even post a link to this AMA on our front page at Pilots For 9/11 Truth.
I hope this thread will prove to be informative.
Regards, Rob Balsamo Founder Pilots For 9/11 Truth
Edit - I just created this thread....
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=22833
If you need more confirmation, I can do the same on our FB group and twitter account.
Edit2 - I made this post below after this thread had 142 comments and 58 points -
To the mods,
I have been dealing with trolls and shills for the better part of 8 years.... since I founded P4T in 2006. This is how I was able to spot it so quickly with "Richard_Gage", and prompted me to email Richard himself. Those here who offer nothing but insults in order to provoke an emotional response is textbook trolling and/or tactics of truth suppression. I will, from this moment forward... ignore anyone who personally attacks our organization and me. Please get your sub under control... or you won't have many who want to do an AMA in this sub... and it will just be another reddit romper room.
[Hyperlinks removed]
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams, so why was there molten metal at the WTC collapse sites?
NIST claims that WTC 1&2 collapsed due to jet fueled fires (just normal offices fires for WTC7) which were not hot enough to produce molten steel or iron, but also claim that if there had been molten steel or iron in the debris afterwards, it would have been irrelevant to the cause of the collapses. The evidence of molten steel or iron cannot be called “irrelevant,” given the fact that the building fires, as NIST pointed out, cannot explain it.
Physical Evidence
Early in 2002, Barnett and two WPI colleagues published an analysis of a section of steel from one of the Twin Towers, along with sections from WTC 7, as an appendix to FEMA’s 2002 World Trade Center Building Performance Study
Their discoveries were also reported in a WPI article entitled “The ‘Deep Mystery’ of Melted Steel,” which said:
Steel – which has a melting point of 2,800 degrees Fahrenheit – may weaken and bend, but does not melt during an ordinary office fire. Yet metallurgical studies on WTC steel brought back to WPI reveal that a novel phenomenon – called a eutectic reaction – occurred at the surface, causing intergranular melting capable of turning a solid steel girder into Swiss cheese.
Stating that the New York Times called these findings “perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation,” the article added:
A one-inch column has been reduced to half-inch thickness. Its edges – which are curled like a paper scroll – have been thinned to almost razor sharpness. Gaping holes – some larger than a silver dollar – let light shine through a formerly solid steel flange. This Swiss cheese appearance shocked all of the fire-wise professors, who expected to see distortion and bending – but not holes.
In May 2004, the RJ Lee Group issued a report, entitled “WTC Dust Signature,” at the request of the Deutsche Bank, in order to prove (to its insurance company) that the building was “pervasively contaminated with WTC Dust The report listed five elements in this signature, one of which was: “Spherical iron and spherical or vesicular silicate particles that result from exposure to high temperature
In 2005, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) published a report entitled “Particle Atlas of World Trade Center Dust,” which was intended to aid the “identification of WTC dust components.” Among the components, it reported, were “metal or metal oxides” (which could not be distinguished by the USGS’s methods). “The primary metal and metal-oxide phases in WTC dust,” the report said, “are Fe-rich [iron-rich] and Zn-rich [zinc-rich] particles
Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction
Journal of the American Society of Safety Engineers
The debris pile at Ground Zero was always tremendously hot. Thermal measurements taken by helicopter each day showed underground temperatures ranging from 400ºF to more than 2,800ºF
Sources related to exceptionally high temperatures, and/or to persistent heat at Ground Zero
FEMA documents in their Appendix C of its May 2002 WTC Building Performance Assessment Team study, for sample 1, “evidence of a severe high temperature corrosion attack on the steel, including oxidation and sulfidation with subsequent intergranular melting.” A “sulfur-rich liquid” containing “primarily iron, oxygen, and sulfur” “penetrated” into the steel.
Testimonial Evidence
Testimony from Firefighters:
New York Fire Department Captain Philip Ruvolo said: “You’d get down below and you’d see molten steel, molten steel, running down the channel rails, like you’re in a foundry, like lava.
Joe O’Toole, a Bronx firefighter who worked on the rescue and cleanup efforts, reported that one beam lifted from deep below the surface months later, in February 2002, “was dripping from the molten steel.”
New York firefighters recalled in the documentary film Collateral Damages, “heat so intense they encountered rivers of molten steel.”
Testimony from Other Professionals:
Leslie Robertson, a member of the engineering firm that designed the World Trade Center, said 21 days after the attack: “When we were down at the B1 level, one of the firefighters said, ‘I think you’d be interested in this,’ and they pulled up a big block of concrete and there was a, like a little river of steel, flowing.”
Ron Burger, a public health advisor at the National Center for Environmental Health who arrived at Ground Zero September 12, 2001, said: “Feeling the heat, seeing the molten steel, the layers upon layers of ash, like lava, it reminded me of Mt. St. Helen’s and the thousands who fled that disaster.”
In late fall 2001, Dr. Alison Geyh of the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health reported: “Fires are still actively burning and the smoke is very intense. In some pockets now being uncovered, they are finding molten steel.”
Joe Allbaugh, the Director of FEMA, said in an October 2001 interview on CBS: “It’s just too hot for rescuers to get into [some] areas. So we do not know yet what’s in those areas, other than very hot, molten material.”
Dr. Keith Eaton reported in Structural Engineer: “They showed us many fascinating slides . . . ranging from molten metal which was still red hot weeks after the event, to 4-inch thick steel plates sheared and bent in the disaster.”
Don Carson, a hazardous materials expert from the National Operating Engineers Union, said six weeks after 9/11: “There are pieces of steel being pulled out from as far as six stories underground that are still cherry red.”
Testimony from Other Credible Witnesses:
Greg Fuchek, vice president of a company that supplied computer equipment used to identify human remains, reported that “sometimes when a worker would pull a steel beam from the wreckage, the end of the beam would be dripping molten steel.”
Sarah Atlas, of New Jersey’s Task Force One Urban Search and Rescue, arrived at Ground Zero on September 11 and reported that “fires burned and molten steel flowed in the pile of ruins still settling beneath her feet.”
Tom Arterburn, writing in Waste Age, reported that the New York Department of Sanitation removed “everything from molten steel beams to human remains
Videos
WTC2 South Tower, Molten Metal pouring out the North-East Corner
Pouring molten aluminum into a pool
Molten aluminum into cold water
The fact that the rubble contained steel or iron that had been melted shows that the buildings were destroyed by something other than fire and airplane impact.
When all of this physical evidence is combined with the testimony about explosions from many types of professionals, the claim that the Twin Towers were brought down by nothing other than the airplane impacts and resulting fires is simply not credible
Its not like there aren't heterosexual non-married christians. I know several christian men in their mid to late 30s.. never been married because they haven't met the right godly woman to marry. Are they not called to that same vow of celibacy?
in other words, God has yet to bring them together with a partner that allows them to glorify God. Maybe he will, maybe he won't. God is the one that puts love in our hearts, etc.
Besides, research suggests that its possible, if not probable for a primarily gay woman to fall in love with a man.. if its the right man.
see Rosario Butterfield, for an example of this. Or Pastor Sean Harrison as an example of a homosexual man who is still gay, but fell in love with a woman, as well.. who he married and has kids with.
If God chooses to bring a man in to this woman's life, and that is what he wants to do for his glory, you can be sure she would fall in love with that man.
The MSM is absolutely, 100% controlled by third-wave tumblr-feminists at the editorial position and above. These people censor ANYTHING which is critical of feminism, at all. They consider dissent to be "hate speech" and do all in their power to purge it.
This is not just the comment sections, which generally become graveyards, this goes to experienced columnists and editorialists.
For reference, here's an article and video detailing the censorship an experienced MSM writer went through when offering relatively mild criticism of feminism's vilification of men and boys. (She is one of few practitioner's of C.H. Somers' brand of 'feminism')
There are other documented cases, like the time magazine december 2014 "words to ban" poll which was suddenly censored when the word "feminist" got 50% of the vote out of a dozen candidates.
Also, any article which becomes an embarrassment to feminists later generally goes down the memory hole, such as articles blasting feminist law professor Elizabeth Sheehy's book as both advocacy and guide to wholesale execution of husbands. At the time this was happening there were about 6-7 articles, now there's one, if you dig far enough.
I gave up debating feminists ages ago. Debating them just gives credibility to their batshit insane views. Now I just troll them to make my valid points instead.
Some mangina was trying to get me to sign some stupid petition to "end violence against women" in the name of "equality". I had to explain to him that men are victims of violence far more often than women are, and that if women want equality we should be beating them more to make up for the inequality.
The look on his face was priceless.
The point I was making was valid though. Violence against women is not a problem when compared to violence against men and the drive to decrease violence against women without also decreasing the violence against men is deeply sexist. Violence by people against other people, irrespective of gender, is a problem. Feminists don't care when men are the victims of crime because they don't see men as people they can empathise with. We are like dogs to them.
The same can be said for the pay gap which doesn't actually exist. Or rape culture, which doesn't exist. A person does not have to verbally consent to sex for her to consent, most of the time sex happens because of micro-communications, that isn't rape. There's a big difference between a girl who is enjoying sex and a girl who is visibly distressed, so unless you are shit faced drunk or autistic then raping someone is fairly difficult to do by accident. Feminist drives to bring in "affirmative consent" laws is essentially persecution of men, but also harmful to women. It makes a legal and harmless act illegal for no good reason. Feminists are extremists and need to be ridiculed for holding such views.
The first Left Behind series led me to Christ actually. Grew up Catholic without knowing God wanted to have a personal relationship with me. Only had head knowledge not heart knowledge.
Read the explanation of salvation and that God wanted me and from there on in it was Holy Spirit indwelt and tears for the rest of the night.
Woke up the next day as a new creation who had a personal relationship with his Creator.
I know God has a sense of humor.
Your immediate reaction may be: separate seating for men and women is a sure sign of discrimination. That's what my wife and I thought before we became Baal Teshuvas and I'd like to share a different perspective with you.
First off, a quick back story. I walked into a Conservative Shul to say Kaddish for my father's yertzeit and the couple in the row in front of me had an insanely attractive teenage daughter that clearly didn't want to be in Shul. She was texting her friends and was wearing what I can only describe as a micro mini-skirt and a deep W neck sweater. My ability to pray was zero.
Am I a scumbag for being distracted by the girl?
On why the birthrate in Europe is declining
I blame feminism. In the past men went out to work and women's job was basically to find a husband and make babies. Men were happy because sex, women were happy because they like babies.
Ever since feminism became popular women now have to drag their ass out of bed at 7am every morning for 45 years of their life. They have to spend at least 8 hours of their day doing something they don't enjoy, otherwise they would do it for free, when in fact most of them would probably prefer to spend their time with their children.
It's not like they're even better off, I read a thing that said the average family nowadays where both parents work is as well-off as the average family in the 1920s where only the husband worked. Including all women in the labourforce means a massively increased supply of labour, and when you increase the supply of anything the price falls. All that feminism has achieved is that ugly women no longer need to worry about finding a husband, which explains a lot about modern feminists and why they're all fat beasts.
[An article describes how Italian Jews are having trouble finding rabbis willing to let them perform their uniquely Italian traditions due to the influence of Ashkenazi Orthodoxy.]
A lot of this so-called Italian tradition is only a century or so old, and is just a mixture of assimilation and ignorance. American Orthodoxy had the same problem in the first half of the 20th century.
[...]
Even if [...] halachic observance was often quite weak among Italian Jews, that does not mean that laxity in observance became the minhag [tradition] of Italian Jewry! Laxity in observance is not a minhag, regardless of how widespread it becomes.
Liberals are children who can't stand the idea that people disagree with them to the point that ANYONE who disagrees with them are hate spewing monsters. With that mindset, it makes sense to them that anyone who doesn't believe in what they believe in should literally lose everything. That's the mindset that gets SJWs to feel legally justified in burning down a pizza joint because the owner said "I won't cater a gay wedding", even though they were never before asked to cater one and never denied catering one, just said that since we have the legal option not to do it, we will take it.
If Liberals could go into the homes of Social Conservatives, take everything for the thought crime of disagreeing with them. And I mean everything including heirlooms that only have sentimental value and the garbage in the trashcan, they would. If they could force a person out of their homes, rental or not, for the crime of disagreeing with them, they would. If they could remove the children from that home and place the children in homes of proper thinking Liberal foster parents, they would. Black ball conservatives to the point that no one would hire them and make it impossible to start a business, while denying any form of government assistance because of the crime of being a conservative, they'd do it.
Since Obama has taken office, it's become dreadfully clear from Liberals that their biggest enemy, the only enemy that the see, are Conservatives. Right after the Boston Marathon bombing, Michael Moore and other Liberals instantly blamed Conservatives/Tea Party Members for the attack. The Tea Party has been under attack since the start by Liberals for things that the Tea Party honestly doesn't stand for and never said.
(Women unhappy with husband's recent red pill behavior, wanted equal relationship. Women later decided to divorce in an update.)
First of all, no one went to your husband and forced the red pill down his throat, so there's no need to thank us for that. He went looking for marriage advice because he wasn't happy with the way things were in your marriage together. You need to take a good hard look at your marriage and ask yourself why he could possibly be unhappy. Then, you need to sit him down and ask him why he's unhappy and why he wants you to be submissive and why he wants to "break you" (what does that even mean?). What exactly does he want from his relationship with you and what can you do to give it to him? You need to ask him to be specific and you need to be quiet while he speaks (unless it's to ask him to clarify something) so you can fully comprehend what he is telling you. Why does he want to be in charge? Why does he want to be in control? Do you love him and trust him enough to give him what he wants and needs to be happy in your marriage? if the answer is no, you do not trust him and no, you do not love him enough to give him this, then just divorce. Right now, just end it.
If you actually want to save your marriage, then, after that talk with him where you actually hear what he is asking you to do, you try to do it. He wants you to stop questioning his decisions? For the sake of your marriage, you keep negative comments to yourself. He wants you to be submissive in the bedroom? For the sake of your marriage, you let him toss you around. He wants to decide where to go and what to do? For the sake of your marriage, you go and do those things with a smile. Give it an honest-to-goodness try for a month, then sit him down and re-evaluate. Are you now giving him what he wants? If no, ask him what to do differently. If yes, can you be the wife he wants you to be after a month of living it?
I found TRP after I had just gotten out of an "equal" relationship that I was completely unhappy in. A few months later, as I was still swallowing that sometimes-bitter pill, I met my husband. He was pretty naturally alpha, but I introduced him to TRP forums and Married Man Sex Life. It took us a long time, trying (100% trying, not half-assed trying) new techniques and different things, working on our communication, to come to the point we're at today; with him as captain and me as first mate. It took me a very long time to come to trust him and his actions and his decisions. But I trust myself and I know I married a good man. I am not my husband's underling or slave. We work together to further our mutual and individual goals; generally, he handles the big picture and I handle the details. That's how we work, it's absolutely perfect for us. If you truly and deeply want to save your marriage, instead of blaming us or your husband, take a long, hard look at what is actually going on and make an effort to fix it.
A violent genocide against whites is inevitable at some point when they reach a small enough minority. Many white liberals actually secretly fantasize about this and, whether or not they realize it, privately would not mind if such a thing happened.
The funny hing is that once whites are gone the society will quickly turn into a combination of Africa and Mexico. Though there is always a liberal either dishonest or stupid enough to say "what's wrong with that?" as though they have no concept of good/bad, up/down, or better/worse. No matter how "bad" blacks (in general, as would not need to be clarified in anything but a degenerating, increasingly dumbed-down, repressive politically correct society) have it here because of "whites" (a stupid, ignorant belief in the first place that doesn't deserve any amount of attention but which has caught on due to the tendency for people to allow their emotions and "sympathy" to override their logical capacities, ultimately resulting in negative results and hence being unforgivable) it will be ten times worse without them. Simply look at what happened to Africa after whites departed and "freed" the people there (a delusion liberals clutch to as though their very souls depend on it).
Choose between cannibal warlords systematically raping and eating your children, on a weekly basis, or having white people building beautiful hotels and vistas and giving you posh jobs and running water, electricity, and housi- sorry, I meant s-slave labor and c-colonialism...
Sorry if this post is too "racist" for you guys. I genuinely mean no offense to black people. I don't view truth, objectivity, rationality, or fact as offensive in and of itself. I believe my position here is fairly reasonable and not based in hate or cruelty.
[Someone's daughter just returned from Israel and is very critical of its policies toward Palestinians.]
It is depressing to hear that your daughter has begun treading down the path of anti-semitism. And yes, it is anti-semitism. [...] Someone who reaches that conclusion, and focuses nearly exclusively on alleged Israeli wrongdoings is quite obviously not motivated by any sort of logic. That person is either mentally insane or fuelled by outright anti-semitism. I really hope you have a series of serious conversations with your daughter, because the path of anti-semitism is a dangerous one. You should be as outraged at her as if she was contemplating joining the Klan. She is in her young formative years, and prone to outside influence, and it's your duty as a father to counter the hateful anti-semitic influence she has been exposed to.
[Arguing whether the serpent lied in the garden of eden]
"Clearly "thereof" does not have the meaning"
Clearly?? Usually, when people write something like this they have reasons that support the idea. What are yours?
Clearly "thereof" does not have the meaning you are desperately trying to give it.
Google, define thereof
How about a dictionary website? Here is one. The definition listed is...
from that cause or particular
Which is pretty much exactly what I wrote before - "Because of this". As usual, you have chosen to disagree with something that is very obvious and easy to demonstrate. Why? Are you a troll?
"thereof" means of something, in this case the fruit."
No, it means because of eating the fruit. How are you this dumb?
" But at least you now you accept..."
I have always accepted that they were cursed to die on the same day they ate the fruit. You may remember, that was my point from the begining. To sum up the argument, it goes like this:
The Bible says, in older translations and not newer ones that accord with modern word use, that Adam and Eve would surely die on the day that they ate the fruit. When they eat the fruit, they are cursed to surely die. You think the fact that they didn't fall down dead that same day means that the whole "surely die" thing never happened. You are totally ignoring the fact that on that day, they are cursed to SURELY DIE, exactly as predicted.
Restating the argument, I hope it is clear that your efforts here are nonsense.
" The second problem you have is that your still implying by your argument that Adam and Eve were created immortal."
Adam is cursed to surely die as a punishment for eating the fruit. Quoting scripture is not "implying" an interpretation.
"Clearly Adam would only live forever if he ate the fruit"
Repeating this doesn't make it true. Sorry to ruin your favorite method of argument. I've already linked the scripture where Adam is cursed to surely die as punishment for eating the fruit. So no, it isn't at all clear that Adam would only live forever if he ate the fruit of Life.
" No, that is not what "ad hominem" means"
a fallacy in which a claim or argument is dismissed on the basis of some irrelevant fact or supposition about the author or the person being criticized
We're done here. I genuinely hope you are a troll. Nobody should be this dumb. If you aren't... just, do the world a favor, and never share your opinion about anything, ever again.
Thanks.
[Hyperlinks left out]
Okay so here's the thing. All this stuff is in the bible. I spent my whole childhood constantly hearing bibles verses like "the whole world is lying in the power of the wicked one" and about Babylon the great in Revelation.
The jist of it is Satan is in control of this system. Which to me sounded like mumbo jumbo. Then one night my dad told me to look up Lucis Trust and after even partially looking into it it I didn't doubt the bible. In fact I couldn't believe how extremely easy it is to see how satanic the world is.
By that I don't mean everyone's gonna start drawing pentagrams and worshipping the devil. Instead, he's just trying to prove God wrong in the sense that humans don't need to be ruled. They can be their own gods and they don't want to be ruled. THERE IS A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CHRISTIANITY AND CHRISTENDOM. God actually hates Christendom. All the kids getting molested and people talking in tongues thinking its divine or whatever. It's actually nasty. No fucking wonder people have such a bad take on religion these days.
What's scary is it IS part of the UN. And they make books for education which they want to be worldwide. They want "one unified belief". Which yeah sure sounds ok I guess no more fighting over religion. But if that belief is what Lucis trust believes?!? Im just saying, all people have to go is spend 3 minutes googling this stuff. Its just crazy.
[To give some context my father in-law is a true piece of shit. He cheated on his first wife and his second wife, multiple times. Never paid child support. His first set of kids from his first marriage (of which my wife is the oldest) hates him.
But he loves Jesus, also thats how the email was sent. No paragraphs, no formatting, and lots of bad grammar.]
Nicole, There are a lot of things that you should know about what is going on. 2500 armored vehicles ordered by homeland security. Use of drones here. The 6500 Moslems in the military. The moslems in his administration. I still don't understand how you can call what lesbians and gay men do as love. Its just a hurt on hurt codependent relationship that has 60% more disease than heterosexuals, and they live 20 yrs. less. So how does that make it good for homo's. Telling the truth, is not hate. Everyone is trying to redefine definitions so they can support there own position. They are trying to make truth relative to support whatever position they want to take. Its obvious by the design of men and women, what God meant. Its also obvious by the consequences, just like with any other sin, what God meant. But most dangerous of all, there is no conscience more seared and dead, than that of a homosexual. They can perform well to look normal, but it is all an act. They want you to think they are equal or better than hetero's, and by God, without the responsibility of kids and a wife, they can look better in some regards. But how gross is it for a child to have homo parents, daddy and daddy, mommy and mommy. How can you not see this. Its gross, nasty, vile. How can you call that love. Anyway, not a putdown, just an alert. Your are swimming in very dangerous waters with sharks. You have know idea what Barak and his supporters are up to, and that boggles my mind. Its something far beyond socialism. But even if it were only socialism, given the impoverished and tyrannical nature of all socialist governments, all of them, how can you possibly support that. All those idiots have to do is mention the abuses of the wealthy, which pale in comparison to the abuses on a population under socialism, and you run to there support. How did the professors at ASU make you so blind. Capitalism has nothing to do with the greed or money, but the model and structure within which one discovers there passion, how God made us to be and what he made us to do, and then having a way to use it to achieve the highest and best possible life and happiness, at least here on this globe. That is not even remotely possible under any other form of government. Its me being a landscaper, you working at a capitalist paving company, Clarissa doing her hair thing. Capitalism is capitalizing on opportunity. It only exist like that here. How in the world can you want that to die. It took Jesus Christ, and thousands of years of oppression to birth it, and now you want to kill it because of a few reject professors, and probably a few friends who drink the same kool aid. And as far as Mike thinking that the whole Bible is a metaphor, the miracles and all, I bet he would like to have one of those miracles about now, say? I mean when you say you pray, do you pray to the God and Jesus one and only of the Bible, or the great cosmos, the great spirit. Some enigmatic unknowable God made up by the deceived and perverted minds of men to promote their own evil desires over the blind masses. Barak Obama has almost succeeded in destroying the only thing left before he declares himself to be Moslem, and that is our government itself. He promotes such ridiculous laws that conservatives and Christians could obviously never vote for, and then pounds it home that they don't support him, that he tried to work with them, and that Congress is acting along party lines, rather than working for the good of the country. He wants to make them look so ineffective, that the people, of which you are one of his minions, will give him complete power and control to fix everything. At that time, he will round up all the Christians, because they are as extreme as the Islamics according to him, put them in concentration camps that he is already making, complete with thousand and thousands of plastic coffins, and give everyone else a chip to put in the arm, which you will gladly wear yourself, and be proud that he finally fixed everything, just like Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Mao and the others did. How can you not see what he is really up to. We need to have a talk about this and stop acting like everything is OK. I love you and Clarissa to death, but you are in love with the "John the Baptist" of the antichrist, or the antichrist himself. I can not rap my mind around that, and I can not ignore it any longer. Just like with all ravenous unrestrained sinners, the more power Barak gets, the more he bypasses Congress and sees he can get away with it, the more he wants. Its the law of diminishing returns, just like with drug addicts, sexaholics who have to continually do more and more perverse things to get the same high, money holics who will do anything to anyone to get it, its the same thing. How does this escape someone who is as smart as you are, and knowing what you know about God and the Bible. You must come to terms with this before it is too late. Football, work, life, love, all great, but there is a 900 pd guerilla in the room. Lets talk about him. I love you sweety, way too much to remain silent and hope you will figure this all out for yourself. I would be the worst dad if I did not address this, the worst. There is only one path way to heaven, not because I am blind and God is mean, but men are blind, and there is only one God, who sent his only Son. Other Gods are just made up in the minds of men. Only one God has intervened, and shown himself to man. Only one God who made earth, talks to his creation, helps his creation, loves his creation, and has sought to redeem us from our own acts. All other religions tell you just go out and do good things. But this does not change your heart, only Jesus can change the heart so that our good becomes the automatic extension of our relationship with him. We don't have to spend hours chanting, or clanging on gongs, or talking to dead relatives. We don't have to do good to cover our evil. Jesus covers our evil so we can be and do good. Lets come to agreement on these things over time, and in the power of Gods love. There is no freedom outside of Christ, and the entire history of man, and the history of this country prove that beyond argument. I love you love you, and this is why I send this. I pray that mikes fistula just disappears, and that he sees the power and glory of God. He needs to know God. I did not say he wasn't nice and wonderful, he is. I just want him to know God and the fullness of his love. Talk to you soon, Dad
If theology doesn't matter to you, please quit your job. Having theological integrity goes hand in hand with being morally responsible, as Christians derive morality from scripture. There are moral absolutes and your job is to prepare kids for a lifetime of people telling them there arent. The years of junior and senior high school are incredibly important for a developing worldview. Your job is not to convert them, but to try and live out the life of Christ and hope that He brings them to himself in time.
You can also love people despite opposing a sinful lifestyle, regardless of if its open homosexuality or anything else. I was part of a GSA in high school, and had mutually beneficial dialogue. Even though I disagreed with their lifestyle choice, I still accepted them as people. At the end of the day, it is their responsibility and I did what I could.
Please dont impose your own feelings on scripture, but let scripture inform your morality. Christ was the most loving of all men, but he also made no concession for sin.
...
Sorry, you quoted the article that you linked so I assumed you were the author. I am very passionate about Christian leadership that is in error. Clearly not much of what I said really applies to you. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
I agree that there is a huge problem with Christians unable to love people "in sin." Parents that cut off ties with children because of lifestyle is horrific. Jesus is very likely ashamed of a lot of Christian action.
That being said, understanding that spiritual death is worse than physical death is important to grasp the Christian perspective. There is no difference between a life lived apart from Christ for 90 years or for 10 years, since both are spiritually dead for eternity. Many Christians use a corrupted view of this to alienate the living, instead of sharing the love of Christ in hopes that they will be changed by God.
There are rules of war and one of them is that you rape the living hell out of the other side's women.
Along comes the IDF and they claim they hold to "higher standards" and don't rape the women.
That's bullshit. That's discrimination.
No wonder the UN is calling Israel out.
Violate the women or you will be singled out as the greatest violator of women's rights.
I don't care if you Liberal Sabras hate Bibi.
At the end of the day, Obama can focus his ire on dozens of enemies in the Middle East.
Taking trash about whoever is Israel's PM is seen by Arabs and Muslim Jihadists as a weakness to be exploited.
Here is a law: it is never good to show weakness to an Arab. Arabs see the world through a lens of strength and weakness. If you show weakness, they will assume they have strength. If they have strength, they will attempt to take over. Obama and his crew miss this point every single time and the law doesn't change because Bibi isn't in power.
Western culture says that girls need to have the freedom to dress like sexual objects. It is this freedom to dress like whores that will protect them from being objectified.
My brain hurts from the mental retardation of the western mindset.
Anyone that sees modesty as a form of oppression needs to step outside of their PC world and think through the ramifications.
(shouting at the tv - fox news, ferguson riots)
"Oh come on, mace those niggers! These cops need to beat these ebonics looters until they bleed"
"Dad, enough, and dont say that stuff in front of your grandson"
"You need to learn the Ten Commandments, honor your father and mother. You need to learn; thats why you're not wealthy, you dont stand up for whats right or follow God's law"
"like racism?"
"I should disown you."
And you know what, Asian guys, maybe you're pissed about this but it's all of our beta fucking ancestors that thought it would be a great idea to build a strong, traditional family in a world that hates that idea. For every Asian fucking whore there is in this world is a father who wishes he never had a daughter.
Let these fucking whores have kids with white men. Look at how they turn out. These girls are almost uniformly completely insane. I don't need to keep reminding you that Kelly Baltazar and Belle Knox were both mixed race.
Fuck women, even if you find a good one, don't have kids. It's simply not worth it. My father was such an arrogant fucking idiot that he thought it would be a great idea to bring me into this world, the son of a self hating whore mother.
The whole idea that we all should have kids to carry on our legacy is dumb and naive and arrogant. We just feed the machine, man. For every white whore getting gang banged by a basketball team there's a father who wishes he never had to bust that nut. For every Asian slut that thinks she's too good for white guys there's a dad who wishes he never gave birth to the ungrateful whore.
I'd rather die alone, by my own hand, that feed this fucking horrible thresher of race games and power plays. You say we're not victims, yeah we all are, every last goddamn one of us is, we sit here and take cock up our asses and pretend that everything will be okay and that "one day" we can find the one, and can make things better. It won't get better unless you're willing to take drastic steps.
Fuck this fucking world, fuck everyone in it, it deserves everything it gets, it deserved Elliot Rodger, it deserved the disease, the sickness, the war.
Here's a letter to my dead Asian whore of a mother that I wrote, I hope you can read this and see the rage I have
Dear mom, you dirty fucking Asian cunt, white worshipping piece of shit whore,
I'm so very fucking sorry that Asian men weren't good enough for you. Again, I'd like to congratulate you on the fact that you gave me a white face that I could pass through this fucked up racist world, and I'd like to thank you for being so fucking incredibly forwardly thinking that you decided to fuck only white men; now, unfortunately, because of genetics, neither I nor my brother could ever have your coveted blonde hair or blue eyes, but that's alright, because it's good to know that deep down, you resent us because we look whiter than you, and because deep down, you still resent us for reminding you that no matter how much white sperm you took, you could never be white. Neither could I.
Oh, how sorry I am, you whore, you fucking degenerate whore, that you told the world that you hated Asian men, but yet you gave birth to two of us. I'm so fucking sorry that Asian men offended you SO much that you had to give into white supremacy and let the world know that you thought that the white master was king, and that his bastard offspring, both worse and better at the same time, was nothing more but the result of a conquest.
Don't feed me that fucking Asian men are patriarchal BULLSHIT. IT'S JUST FUCKING BULLSHIT AND YOU KNOW IT. White patriarchy is and will always be the be all and end all of patriarchy and you gave into it because it got your ratchet fucking pussy wet. That's all it was, you WHORE. You brought me into this world as a slave, a son of a slave master and a plantation female Uncle Tom; that's what you were. You, and all the other ugly brown whores in my family, tell yourselves over and over that you think Asian men are patriarchal, but all it is is that you like thing white cocks are better, and because you have a pussy and are able to use it to get whatever the fuck you want (thanks female privilege) you could get yourself a nice white man - and lo and behold you did - and this one was a beta Christian idiot who thought that you were God's answer to white women not wanting him. Oh, you played your cards right, didn't you mommy, didn't you.
Look at you. You're dead now. You're buried in the ground and have been for 15 years. My little white head tore you open and you got some bad blood from that, didn't ya? So sorry about that - you could have lived, couldn't you? But once your hormones wore down and you realize the mistake you had made, marrying a broke white guy who loved Jesus more than you - then you decided to end your life, didn't you? Isn't that what you did? You abandoned your two children - your two little half chinks. Now look at us. I can barely work I'm suicidal and depressed; my brother is bedridden and insane, he'll never work another day in his fucking life.
Look at us. LOOK AT US. YOU DID THIS TO US.
ALL YOU ASIAN WOMEN WHORES DID THIS TO US.
And it's not Asian men who are saying this. Asian men are too fucking naive to see what's really going on. But I see what's going on. You fucking sluts eye fuck me on the train every day; to you I'm just another tall white guy. But if you knew that I had won the genetic lottery and didn't come out looking Asian, oh boy, how quickly you would change your mind. I'm saying this. One of your precious "white / mixed race" children is saying this. I'm the patriarch, you fucking sluts. I AM. LOOK AT ME.
YOU MADE ME INTO THIS.
FUCK YOU. FUCK YOU, MOTHER. YOU THINK I HAVE KEPT THIS INSIDE ME FOR SO LONG? YOU THINK YOUR ACTIONS WOULDN'T HAVE REPURCUSSIONS? I'M ON THE BRINK OF SUICIDE EVERY FUCKING DAY FOR FIFTEEN GODDAMN YEARS, YOUR ELDEST SON IS BEDRIDDEN AND MENTALLY ILL AND OH, SHIT, WHAT A GREAT IDEA TO JUST SAY FUCK YOU TO ASIAN MEN, YET YOUR OWN SONS ARE ASIAN MEN?
YOUR OWN FUCKING SONS?
Read this, Asian women, READ THIS. I FUCKING DARE YOU.
I FUCKING DARE YOU TO READ IT.
And before you go off calling me Elliot Rodgers, at least you recognize that Elliot Rodgers was a little half-chink like me; the product of YOU. I am no harm to anyone, just myself. You all deserve this fucking hell on earth. Every single one of you cunts should be forced to live on earth for a million years. And I wish, I wish from the bottom of my fucking heart, that every one of your kids has exactly the same problems as me. Fuck you mom, fuck you and your dyed hair and colored contacts.
Fuck every last ounce of you. It took me a long time to say it but I said it. FUCK. YOU.
Oh yeah, I said it. Go and cry about misogyny, you whores. I'm your chosen one - America's little mixed race darlings, us magical mixed race unicorns that are nothing more than the products of aggressive sexual selection - that's me. And I say fuck you. Fuck you to hell. Burn in every last bit of hell.
I know exactly what you mean. It's extremely annoying this demonisation and inflation of rape (of women). They act like rape is the worse thing that could possibly happen to a person. Judging by the lack of suicides of rape victims, I beg to differ. And you know if they were all offing themselves instead of posting about it on internet blogs, they would never let us hear the end of it.
Must not be as 'traumatic' as they make it seem. And Western society's reactions only exacerbate any negative feelings a rape victim might feel. They literally pimp victimhood to the point where women are asking obvious questions like 'Was I raped?'. Isn't this like asking 'Was I beaten?'. Even if you didn't feel like you were, after talking to them, you would.
So why was rape chosen to be put on a pedestal over even the murder/beating of women by the feminists? I guess it's because rape takes away women's sexual power, which is one of their strongest assets whether they're in denial about it or not. They demonstrate their own value by how they latch on to this over more important things.
The State jumps on board with the rape and 'statutory' rape hysteria too because they get so much control from it. Why should the State have any involvement with who anyone chooses to have a relationship with (of whatever age, mind you) as long as noone is forced or coerced? You would think that parents and adults could decide these things for themselves and their children but I guess they gave up that 'right' among the others.
The myth of 'sexual trauma', the perversion of the definition of rape, and false accusations doesn't help either.
Is the new Armenian American strategy to edit encyclopedias, and then use these as proof that Turkey's wrong? Worked great with Wikipedia, gotta do the same to Brittanica? Get over it, man, we have enough politicians obsessed with the past ourselves as it is.
It can be hard to, of course, get over it, when your entire culture seems to cherish being so fixated with something this much. Just take a look at the front page of /r/Armenia. If you don't think anything is out of the ordinary, that's a sign.
What women really want from a husband is commitment. This is what they need to feel comfortable having children with the husband and raising a family. She wants commitment to be assured that the husband will always be there to support the family, especially when the wife is pregnant or with infants which put her in a weak position. So why are women so upset by male extramarital sex? Because modern women have been brainwashed to believe that male extramarital sex is an indication of lack of commitment. Historically you cannot find any instance of women complaining about casual extramarital sex by husbands before Paul started complaining about this in the New Testament. Of course women were jealous of mistresses throughout history, and this make sense since this is a real threat to her husband's commitment to her. It was Paul who introduced this terrible concept of male sexual fidelity to human culture. And even today, it is the degree of influence of Paul-based Christian culture on a society that determines the level of women's jealousy about male extramarital sex. Feminism is an extension of this culture and takes it to new extremes.
My parents did two mistakes-
A more obvious one is that they never did anything to help me with a phobia that made me unable to meet girls in the romantic context IRL until I was 18. This was something that can't be forgiven. It was obvious I can't and they did nothing.
In the long run, more importantly but something I can less blame them for - they never taught me to rape and maim women. But that I can understand more since this wasn't needed when they got married and became needed in my county only at the turn of a century in case of men who can't use seduction.
A modern woman is an insane sexual receptacle. She cannot understand the idea of any relationship. She just wants to be fucked and tossed and will hate anybody who fails to do so.
A non-seductive man who doesn't break a woman's legs, spine and teeth is immediately seen as a loser.
If we intend to transition from a society that oppresses women to a woman-centered society, we should start with education. From a young age, women need to be taught the dangers of associating with men. We'd also teach them about PIV and the dangers of Trauma-Bonding to a male that come with it. They should be taught about men's toxic sexuality, the dangers of hetero-captivity, and how they need woman only safe spaces. We would also tailor men's education to helping them resist their necrophilic sexual urges (in the off chance that their violence and sexuality stems from societal conditioning instead of their flawed biology), that they never should congregate in groups, and to never speak or talk over women or invalidate their experiences.
If we continue in this for a generation or two, it's only natural that women will find the prospect of birthing a male child to be a shameful thing. So naturally, upon discovering their unfortunate turn of fate, many will likely abort them. Those that resist doing the sensible thing will be entered into a lottery to see if they are allowed to keep the bastard. Ultimately, we hope to get the male population down to approximately 10% of what it is today.
There will be no gas chambers. That's a male idea and women don't subscribe to it.
At the same time, women will begin working towards parthenogenesis which will render the male forever obsolete. Why run the risk of birthing a defective child who will one day grow up to attack and oppress women when you can have a daughter. It doesn't make sense and may be part of the reason my sister rebelled against the truth I was sharing with her. She is pregnant and I was pushing her to abort if it was a male. Her mind has been too colonized by the men in her life to see the common sense behind such an action.
We'd also only allow the most docile and non-violent of males to donate their semen; in hopes of breeding out some of the worst male characteristics.
In addition, we'd levy a tax on males and would redistribute the taxed income to women. If they lost an additional 50% of their income, their ability to coerce women financially into hetero-captivity would be significantly diminished. This would help keep women safe.
Over time, we'd begin limiting the number of men that are allowed to congregate in one place. If they are too dangerous to exist alone, they are far more dangerous in groups. I would think no more than three in one place at any time would be acceptable.
We'd remove anything that glorifies men as something that they obviously aren't. We'd smash any monuments that glorify male accomplishments, ban any media that shows them having attributes that they clearly don't (empathy, sensitivity, the capacity for love, etc). We'd also ban male participation in sports. I was in a bar drinking Monday night and realized, for example, that football is legalized male violence and as such is wholly unacceptable and needs to be banned; not only for glorifying male violence but also for elevating men to a position where they can serve as a role model (men rejoice in violence, not only against women, but also themselves).
I don't know that we'd want men to continue to be literate. It doesn't enlighten them and only serves to help them find new and more creative ways to torment women and destroy the planet.
We'd also ban men from holding public office, participating in medicine (as modern medicine is biocidal to women), and participating in commerce. I'd think that ideally we'd train them in the manual arts and let them spend their days breaking rocks, cleaning the toxins they've polluted the planet with, and unmaking those things (e.g. nuclear power plants) that threaten to harm women's harmony with nature.
FactCheckMe had a rather entertaining solution that would also work, though I'm not certain if it is feasible in the short term. Though letting them resort to their base nature and take care of their own population problem behind concrete walls does seem rather appealing. http://factcheckme.wordpress.com/2013/01/09/what-logistical-problem/
["Seriously? If I didn't care about farmed animals, I wouldn't be a vegan."]
Hold up. If you buy meat from the store, that's not vegan. If you take advantage of factory farms and actively participate in animal exploitation then you are not vegan. You can't call yourself vegan to absolve your responsibility for animal cruelty.
["But I'm not going to take it so far as compromising the health of my pets."]
Can we talk about reality? You are literally saying that you have animals killed because you can't think of a better way to take care of your pets.
I can't even begin to explain to you how ignorant this is. YOU ARE ALREADY COMPROMISING THE HEALTH OF YOUR PETS by feeding them an unnatural meat diet composed of processed foods. The standard household cat's diet is garbage, leftovers from the factory farms fortified with chemicals for preservation and to keep the cats off their death bed. Just because there is real meat in your cat food doesn't mean your cats are getting a good diet and to suggest that vegan food is not nutritional only because it doesn't have meat is a type of ignorance I deal with every day.
Banning child labor has the unintended consequences of starvation or child prostitution. Then banning child prostitution would lead to only starvation.
The real solution is to legalize child labor. Fortunately in the US the standard of living is high enough few parents would resort to this type of condition for their children. Unfortunately, the path we are heading, they might need to legalize child labor in the next couple of decades.
The cost of living was so low/standard of living so high, that in the 50's and 60's a husband could provide for his family of 5 or 6 while his wife stayed home and took care of the children. During the 50's and 60's increases in productivity still outweighed the ill effects of inflation. Since the 70's when Nixon severed the last ties to the gold standard, inflation has skyrocketed. The dollar has lost 95% of its value since 1913. Today it takes two parents with 2 children to maintain what a husband could achieve for a family of 5 or 6 including his wife in the 50's and 60's. This is why I say if we keep heading down this path, child labor might have to be legalized to prevent prostitution.
The real pimp here isn't the parents, its the government taxing the poor with inflation.
If you feed your cat a vegan diet it may not be optimal and your cat may suffer and/or die as a result. If you feed your cat a non-vegan diet we know that many animals will be killed after living lives of terrible misery in order to be turned into cat food.
The worst case vegan cat scenario causes less harm to animals than the best case non-vegan scenario. If you are concerned about causing the least harm to animals then feeding your cat a vegan diet is the right choice.
["However, a cat is a natural carnivore"]
This line of argumentation is known as the "appeal to nature". It basically assumes that natural=good (and sometimes that unnatural=bad/inferior). Unfortunately, this argument cannot be applied consistently because there are many natural things which are bad (starvation, disease, etc).
So basically, as a rational argument anything that starts with "this is okay because it's natural" is pretty much a non-starter.
["and needs to eat meat."]
That's certainly debatable. There are nutritionally complete vegan cat foods as well as steps you can take to identify and avoid problems as you transition. Also, in the interests of harm reduction it's not necessarily a black and white thing. Even if you could substitute 25% of your meat-based cat for for an alternative that doesn't require other animals to suffer and be killed that would be an improvement over doing nothing.
["As a human, I can morally decide not to eat animal products."]
Don't you have a responsibility for your cat's actions and your own actions in the course of taking care of the cat?
["A lot of times I talk about this, I get people telling me I am not a "real" vegan because I feed my cat meat."]
Just to be clear, I am not saying that. Although, I would argue that it's not really consistent with "a way of living that seeks to exclude, as far as possible and practicable, all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing and any other purpose" to reject out of hand an alternative that can reduce cruelty and exploitation.
I live in an apartment right in the heart of college rentals. Sitting right on my front porch, I watch it unfold before my very eyes. It's things I've been cogniscent of for awhile, but after watching this Oktoberfest weekend, I felt so assured of the things I've been tossing around in my mind for years.
Rape served a very important function in mitigating female behavior and keeping it in check. Back in the time of prehistory, a woman couldn't behave as shamelessly slutty as she can today, because of the risk of catching the eye of the wrong male. But now, with "consent" laws barring nature back, and feminism and sexual-liberation perverting whole generations of hearts and minds, we find ourselves in a situation gone way, way, too far.
These harpies need to be humbled. And for their own good. Like the child with absolutely no boundaries and no discipline, they may feel they yearn for no rules, but become absolutely lost without an adult to tell them no! If you've ever met such a kid, the type who can have anyone over, at anytime, and do anything, is miserable. The insertion of an authority figure who deals out punishment is met with intense anger and resistance. But the discipline is what was so badly needed. The slaps and smacks may smart, but it helps the child have some semblance of direction as they develop.
These hussies are so far gone, living in a world that is a virtual macrocosm for them of the home for the child with the completely negligent, permissive parent. Disciplinary smacks and slaps come in a different form for these more grown children (college women), since the situation was more extreme in permissiveness and went on for more years. But the curing power of good ol' fashion physical strength wielded to correct can not be understated.
It's not only morally justifiable to rape such a woman, it's and brave.
At the risk of stating the obvious, this isn't true for all female human beings. We're not talking about nuns or grandmothers or humble, married, women of twenty years.
We're talking about filthy, unmitigated, sluts. Oblivious and loud. Shameless. Belligerent. Entitled. Selfie taking, Tindr-whoring, Teenage-walking-herpes-sores. We are talking about bad, bad, individuals. Unruly, neglicted, children, run-amok. That badly need to be punished. Badly.
For the good of society these women need to be raped.
Here we will teach how to do it safely.
Women do leverage sex for additional benefit, unless his attractiveness is drastically more valuable anyway. So... in a way.... brace for it... most women are prostitutes. The only difference is you've got a long-term contract going. The one where you can take him to the cleaners any time. That scam called marriage.
For the sake of argument, lets stick with the strictly economic form of hypergamy, i.e. women marry up economically. In male-female households, the woman usually earns more practically very little of the time.
So, lets say we minus the cost of a nanny, daily sessions with a shitty therapist, all his own expenses, and a housekeeper... what is the rest he's giving her for? Lets say she works part-time. Minus that too and it still leaves a hefty sum left over(in the salaries of most median earning men at least).
I sincerely agree with this man. We must ask our selves, who told us that hitting a woman is not ok? Our Parents? Society? Our Government Masters who have the monopoly on force? The people that created this rule did so at the benifit of women at the detriment to men. Look how our society has fallen and how the divide between men and women has only grown since the war on men and the illegalization of using your masculine power (physical dominance), which now only leaves the feminine power to control society (Social Manipulation). Women without the fear of a good slap when they step out of line soon run wild like a pack of hyenas scavenging the corpse of a once great civilization.
If women are not obligated to give sex to their husbands, what are their marriage obligations?
The marriage deal used to be as follows :
Husband provides resources and protection
Wife provides children and homemaking
Nowadays husbands are still held under coercion to provide resources and protection, but wives do whatever the fuck they want. No wonder there's a crisis.
That redpill woman you're quoting knows what's up. If she can say no to sex, why wouldn't her husband say no to being her money faucet? What will she do once her fertile years are gone? Who will support her? The traditional marriage deal is actually skewed in favor of women in that husbands are kept under coercion until the wife dies although she usually has long outlasted her usefulness in the marriage deal. She's just being given stuff for providing nothing in return once she has produced and reared the all important children.
The current western marriage deal only exists as it is because the State is enforcing it to be that unbalanced. It uses reproductive sexual relationships as a wealth extraction tool. If you don't want to end up living with cats, time to get back to traditional marriage.
Start by creating a lower class comprised of those who are mentally/spiritually weak (atheists, homosexuals/sodomites). Establish a "basic income" for these people (who are now all equal with one another) with strings attached: they have to undergo rigorous Biblical education that trains them spiritually and instills patriotism, strong feelings of national pride and kinship. Those who fail to transition into this type of society (those who rebel/reject their teachings) will be either hung or stoned to death by their peers.
This subclass will be unable to vote or own property but will have guaranteed quality of life, work and lifelong purpose handed down to them from above in accordance with the roles that they are needed to fulfill at a given time.
The upper classes will be comprised of self-actualized, Christian men who have been determined (by a battery of spiritual and psychological testing) to be fit to partake in the running of the economy (free market / capitalist), government (free and democratic), and so on. About 30 to 40% of the population will make up the higher classes (though unclean or non-Christian behavior will warrant being stripped of wealth and land and placed in the lower classes).
The constitution will be the result of ongoing intellectual discussion and debate around Biblical scripture which will serve the foundation of all society. It will be through this interpretation and discussion that the purpose of the subclass will be constantly redefined/adjusted (in times of war/expansion this underclass would fight, in times of peace they would work for greater good).
This is kind of a Spark Notes version but you get the idea.
I disagree that feminism can't explain the same problem in Japan, even when that society is more patriarchal. The explanation for the decrease in the fertility rate is essentially the same. Lots of women are entering the work force and having careers, while men are left to play second fiddle and lose the supporter and mother of their children they need to have a family. In japan, this process has been somewhat accelerated due to the fact that it is so patriarchal, and being a wife means have no career whatsoever.
Myself, I'm not that concerned with the drop in the birth rate.
To be honest, I never understood why people compared the herbivore men in japan with mgtow/redpill etc in the west. I think the causes are fundamentally different. Japanese, as a group, simply are shy and have high anxiety levels. How much of that is cultural and how much is genetic I will let you guess, but either way the result is the same. Extreme timidity prevents marriage and children.
In the west the similar effect, but with a completely different cause. Westerners as a group aren't nearly as timid as that. The are simply responding to the incentives rationally and maximizing their benefit and minimizing their risk. Because of the poor structuring of incentives, you have less marriage and less children.
In china they had a 1 child policy and a cultural bias against daughters, which led to infanticide. So now you have 40 mil more men than women. A shortage of women, not men, is what decreases a demographic.
The only thing common to all is mass education that includes females, but doesn't make them focus on skills and knowledge important for being mothers. Maybe this is the root cause of Japan's and the west's problems, but the factor's above contribute just as much or more in my opinion.
