All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
Headline: Why are so many feminists obsessed with their genitals?
A lot of feminist stuff is associated with female genitalia. There are vagina monologues, vagina hats, vagina boats, paintings using period blood, yoghurt made out of vaginal yeast, etc.
You don't see MRAs do anything similar. Even the most extremist people in the manosphere don't do anything involving penises. The closest I've ever seen was the Wiener's Out thing in South Park, which was a parody.
I wonder why. The expected answer is that women's sexuality is oppressed and stuff, but I really don't see any social situation where penises are more appropriate than vaginas. In fact, it's the opposite: Female nudity is more socially acceptable than male nudity, whether it's in art or in real life. Women who flash their boobs or vaginas are met with cheers, while men who show their penises to people are arrested.
Granted, men do draw dicks on walls, but they don't really do it out of celebration of their masculinity, and it's considered more of a childish thing. Drawing dicks is mostly associated with juvenile humour, while the feminist vagina thing is supposedly classy and deep.
What are your thoughts?
Animals are too valuable to be compared to the whites.
I can confirm this as a black guy from Africa.Liberals are fucking detached, unexposed.Theyre always so willing to stick their heads in the clouds at everybody else's expense.
White people are the least racist and actually the most tolerant in the world.Only western civilization that has created a society that can harbor people of different colours and religions.Non-white countries will not tolerate this and do not apologize for it either
I feel age of consent is more of a social construct which doesn't make it any less value if its there to strengthen a society and that includes making children safe, confident and happy. I don't know if criminalising young adults, breaking up families because of blanket laws and telling a happy child that they should feel bad and dirty is necessarily achieving that. If two people through circumstances end up in love, one is 11 lets say, the other is 19. Perhaps their personal circumstances brought them together, over time they bonded, fell in love and as in any such relationship it turned sexual and mutual. The law would say that they should be broken apart, he should be jailed and she should learn that what they did was wrong and dirty and he was a bad man. The result in this case happens to be she becomes afraid of sex, relationships, has confidence and mental issues well into adulthood. Was that application of the law in her interest, his interest or society's interest? How about 11 and 45 year old since a 25 and 45 year old are both adults.
I don't know the right answers but in my mind it's such a complex area that I don't know if hard laws are always the right answer. More focus should be on sex education and I mean not just biology but also relationships.
[On r/conspiracy putting an image of the Capitol Building with a Star of David overlaid on it in their sidebar]
What foreign country has the largest influence on our government? It’s racist to even mention the most intelligent and wealthy group of people in the world in bed with (sometimes literally marry into) our elite society? They control ME foreign policy and Israel receives billions every year in foreign aid. I could go on and on. The income inequality that is growing so staggeringly? The switch from industrial economy to financial? Half of Americans living paycheck to paycheck? Who do you think benefitted from all of this? They form a large part of the Global Power Elite
This sub is so ideologically blind. Oh btw they created the pc ideology so useful idiots will protect them as they slurp up all the value from the economy through the central banks in every country.
why msut it be so difficult to get a gf, fml
FML
FML FUCK MY LIFE ITS TOO HARD
it likes playing ON IMPOSSIBLE MODEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Theory - The Shooting at Youtube is a false flag to take over social media. The false flag will allow YT to get all the top personalities to be anti-gun, ban channels, no more Gun Rights 2A vids. YT/Google/Big Tech finally able to censor at free will.
How can a child consent to sex with an adult?
Children consent to all kinds of things every day. Ask any parent how difficult it can be to get a strong willed child to do anything from homework to kiss that auntie they don't like.
Many children help to look after disabled family members, help to run families, help in so many ways because children are respected and capable members of society. They don't have a vote of course despite often being smarter than many adults and so without any voice in how they are governed they remain the last section of society without a voice or rights.
Now with regards to sex, why is sex so impossible for a child to understand compared to everything else they cope with in normal life? I was a very sexual child, it was one of the few things I knew I enjoyed. There are also books and research that show this is really very common. We as adults just like to present children as asexual beings too sweet to want anything other than play with toys and sing choir songs.
Hi I am a average student (not a pedophile) that think pedophilia is as normal as any other sexual orientation and just as acceptable.
I believe that the mental anguish that children experience to is due to cultural stigmatization.
I find that the current situation is a witch-hunt on par with what gays experienced and think you are very brave for admitting who you are.
I have these opinion because I done some research into the subject and base my opinion on that research conclusion.
I wish more people would use logos instead of pathos when discussing this matter.
it's literally impossible to have a healthy relationship with a child as an adult.
That is incorrect. It is very possilbe and is in fact normal in a lot of non-western societies. In some it is in fact a rite of passage.
I am sorry, but unless you can provide proof that there is a direct link between sexual activity with children and mental anguish this is nothing but fear mongering.
Hi I am a average student (not a pedophile) that think pedophilia is as normal as any other sexual orientation and just as acceptable.
I believe that the mental anguish that children experience to is due to cultural stigmatization.
I find that the current situation is a witch-hunt on par with what gays experienced and think you are very brave for admitting who you are.
I have these opinion because I done some research into the subject and base my opinion on that research conclusion.
I wish more people would use logos instead of pathos when discussing this matter.
Thanks for your comments. I'm also of the opinion that it could be a natural part of human sociobiology. I think the taboos regarding child sexuality, sexual development, and attraction to children are compounding a lot of problems. I wish western society could simply recognize sexuality as being a normal, natural and generally healthy thing. Instead, we have a kind of love-hate relationship with our own bodies and what we can do with them.
Ultimately, regardless of whether a child involved in an adult-child sexual encounter is harmed by the sex itself, the social climate, the legal system, or a combination of these, such an event most likely will harm them.
I feel it should be self-evident that people who are attracted to, or sexually abuse children are easy targets. Everyone seems to hate these groups (deserved or otherwise) and this manifests in increasingly draconian laws and hysteria. Few think of trying to really understand the issues or look at ways to prevent the potential harm. We could all use a little more logic.
I've been a longstanding member and contributor to this subreddit and the LGBTQ community, but because of the nature of this subject, and the taboos that go along with it, I'm going to reply using this new account, both for my own privacy, and because I've seen firsthand what accusations of even just sympathy for pedophiles can do to a person's reputation. I know we in the LGBTQ community feel like we have been victimized by society's bigotries and for most of us violence or the threat of violence has been a way of life at various points in our lives. What we have been through, or continue to go through, is really nothing compared to what pedophiles go through, and anyone even suspected of being one is treated like an absolute monster. Imagine not only being physically assaulted, but being under constant threat of murder and having to flee not only your home but your entire country, forced to change your name, and live a life of constant fear, not just during your childhood while there are bullies after you for being "different", but forever. That is what pedophile activists have and continue to face. There's no "It Gets Better" for pedophiles. I'm not willing to risk my own account here and good name to discuss this very taboo and dangerous subject. I think it's incredibly brave of you, silentGL, to even come here and speak to us. I hope you're taking precautions and staying safe.
To answer your questions first: 1) Yes. It is clear by any reasonable definition that MAPs are a GSM. I also think it's shameful and cowardly that we in the LGBTQ community kicked you guys out way back when just to make our own lives moderately easier. Furthermore I think that MAPs will eventually gain more public acceptance and that history will look back at what we did and judge us poorly for it. I think it may have even set some of us in the GSM community back, and made it easier for those resisting social change to divide us and make us weaker overall. 2) Yes. I would be open to MAPs potentially being part of the GSM community again. We never should have kicked you out to begin with. Now that homosexuals and bisexuals have largely achieved widespread acceptance, many are already separating themselves from some of the more rare gender/sexual minorities that have been left behind. Pedophilia, hebephilia, etc. would probably even be an asset since those orientations seem much more commonplace. If people can be more tolerant of MAPs as individual human beings deserving basic human dignity, they can be more tolerant of all GSMs. 3) My thoughts on MAPs overall, it's hard to say. I would like to believe that there are about as many rapists among MAPs as there are rapists among any other sexual orientation. In other words, a small minority of individuals with violent or sociopathic tendencies who aren't interested in having sex as much as they are interested in control and power, and forcible sex is their means of getting that power. I have read that a large number of convicted child molesters have no preferential sexual interest in children, but that children made for a convenient target while they were in the mood to hurt somebody. It's a shame that these criminals, many of whom are not actually MAPs, have painted your entire sexual orientation as monsters.
I do have some personal experience with a minor-attracted person, who I guess would be more precisely classified as a pedophile. When I was five and six years old, a family friend/neighbor and I developed a very strong bond. He was the complete opposite of the pedophile stereotype. He was handsome, he was very sociable and confident, and he was the gentlest person I've ever known. My parents would have him baby sit me, either at his house or mine, and we got along great. I loved and trusted him, and he never had to tell me he loved me back, it was clear in his actions from the very start. He wasn't like other adults, he respected me as an individual, showed he cared what I had to say and genuinely wanted to know what I was thinking. He didn't bully me or boss me around like other adults, or ignore my thoughts and feelings, or treat me as being somehow less than because of my age. I could tell he was different, and I think he knew I was different too.
All the talk from people answering silentGL's questions, saying stuff about kids being unable to consent, I find it remarkable. How many of you knew from an early age that you were different, that your feelings about gender or sexuality were different from other kids? How would you feel if somebody told you you didn't know what you were talking about, that your feelings are irrelevant or unimportant when you're that age? I remember very clearly coming out to my parents in 8th grade, and the hurt I felt when they belittled my orientation as "just a phase". They didn't trust me to make up my own mind about my sexuality then, and many of you are doing the same now to every child that might want a relationship with an adult. You should all take a closer examination of your own childhood feelings. You knew more about yourself back then than you are giving kids credit for today.
Anyway, I was different, and so was he. We both knew it without saying a word. He was the only adult I could really talk to about it though. My parents were conservative and kept pushing me into being more girly, more "normal". They didn't get me, but my closest friend, an adult male, he loved me for me. He encouraged me to play how I wanted, and feel how I wanted, and he'd always listen with great care and attention to when I said things about feeling different from other girls. See, I knew I was supposed to like boys, and I did like boys. But I also liked girls. I was six years old and already knew I was bisexual, I just didn't have the vocabulary for it or knew what sex was all about. This man, this pedophile, he not only accepted me for my orientation, but he told me there was nothing wrong with it either. He encouraged me to express myself, he let me draw pictures of two girls holding hands and being married. If I did that at home, my mom would frown and tell me that couldn't happen and that I should only draw pictures of a boy and a girl living together in a house.
When I was seven years old, the relationship I had with my much older neighbor did become something more than just close friendship. My curiosities about sex led me to very aggressively proposition him. There will be those who say he groomed me, or somehow manipulated me into a sexual relationship, but I was the seducer and he was one of the best lovers I've ever had. One of the reasons I am writing this using a new anonymous account is because I don't want this story to ever be traced back to him. I will always protect him, because even now many years later, I still love him and think of those afternoons at his house with nothing but fondness. I am insulted by those questioning my ability to consent to that relationship, which lasted a full five happy years before I felt I ought to end it, and I can only laugh at the irony of people in this community claiming an unconventional relationship like ours can only result in harm to the child. I ended the relationship, by the way, because I didn't want to hurt him by cheating on him, and at the time I was falling in love with a girl at my school. He was disappointed, but respected my decision, and never pressured me into any more sex even though we continued to be close friends for many years after.
The confidence and strength he gave me growing up, not only in my own sexuality but in myself as a person, is really what helped me survive the hardest years of middle school and high school, struggling to be a bi girl whose parents thought it was just a phase, and the many cruelties that other children heaped on her. It didn't matter that our sexual relationship had ended, I could still go over to that man's house after school and cry on his shoulder and tell him about my awful day. He'd hug me and tell me things would get better, and that the people who hated me were just stupid and ignorant. He wasn't somebody who had exploited me, or used me, he was a man who loved me, the whole me, and always treated me with respect and dignity.
While I cannot say for certain that every MAP in the world is like that man I knew, I do know men like him do exist, and can be a positive in the life of a child. I still get so much strength from his words to me when I was young. When I am having sex today, with a man or a woman, I always remember my first time not as a traumatic experience, but as the high bar of which I judge the generosity and respect I receive in my intimate encounters as an adult. I am not ashamed of my sexuality, precisely because that generous and loving man from my childhood taught me about how natural and wonderful it can be to express, with anyone I love. I learned from him that love is never wrong, and I have the self-esteem and self-respect to know what I deserve in relationships and demand I get it.[It breaks my heart to think that man I loved as a young girl would be arrested, called a monster, and locked away for loving me as much as I loved him.
So yes, silentGL, I have empathy for your kind, just as I have empathy for people of all kinds. I will judge you and others of your sexual orientation on a case-by-case basis, as individuals capable of both good and evil, the same as people of any sexual orientation. I have no more or less reason to be suspicious of you, as I would be suspicious of anyone else. I do hope that, whether you act on your feelings or not, you keep yourself safe and you always show respect for the dignity of those you are attracted to. I hope the world can change for you as much as I've already seen it change for me, and continues to hopefully change for all of us. I hope others who are like me, and remember now as adults such relationships as joyful loving occasions, will also speak out.
If there were not legal repercussions, do you think that you would be intimate with a young person?
If it were legal AND socially accepted (or at least tolerated) then I might be interested in having a kind of relationship with a young girl. I imagine it would be essentially a close friendship and nothing more unless she were genuinely interested in exploring and learning about her body and sexuality, and that anything with regard to that would be done on her initiative. I would make certain she was completely comfortable and in control and that her feelings were paramount, and that she could ask me to stop at any moment and I wouldn't be disappointed or angry. I'd take any health considerations into account (hygiene, condoms etc) and wouldn't do anything to her that could physically harm her, ie penetrative sex. Ultimately though the most important thing would be the emotional connection and making her happy and feel loved.
However, in reality, the legal repercussions and the social taboo combine to result in an almost uniformly negative result (though there are exceptions) for any child involved in such a relationship, even under the conditions described above. The fact that doing so is illegal means putting the child into a situation where they would need to hide such a relationship and feel ashamed or conflicted over it, or reveal it and have their adult boyfriend/girlfriend go to jail, and be told that they were abused and that the adult didn't love them and only used them for their own desires - this is true in some or possibly most cases, but would also happen in a theoretical "positive" adult-child relationship. Either way, the child ends up hurt and thus it can not be justified to engage in such a relationship.
I don't think a theoretical positive relationship as described would necessarily be abuse, but I do think it would be abuse to subject a child to the repercussions of it.
they are not.they came over from asia 10,000s of yrs before eastasians even existed as a racial group (evolving from negritos some 20k yrs bce)let alone a dominant one(around 10k bce,before that northern asia was a Ainu/native continent and the southern half was filld with australoid type people)Asians are a recent group in asia who basically genocided their way thru it similar to whites in the americas.TLDR natives have completely caucasoid haplotypes and most anthropologists set themm in the caucasian category in terms of skull size.natives and mongoloids ar eprobabely the MOST divergent race yet somehow since the 1960s some idiots put them in the mongolid category and people think natives are asians(when it would be the opposite if that were even the case,as natives predate asians by thousands of years).natives have diferent bodies,height,frame sizes and proportions than eastasian people.they have protusive maxillas and bone structures /browbones when asians have retracted ones(''flat face'') .the only natives I can see looke ven remotely asian are Brazilian but then even then youd have to Cherrypick as many of them look caucasoidish aswell,and they dont look like eastasians but soem asutronesian types.youd eb ahrdpressed to FIN any native that looks eastasian escept na dene natives (this includes Navajo and apache)from the pacific coast who are RECENT arrivals(10 k after the initial migration)and have mutated haplogroups.
Ive never seen a hapa that looks particularly hispanic,
Balkanization like with Yogoslavia, Czechoslovakia, or Singapore would probably do the trick.
I'm against making things illegal, there just needs to be a shift in public opinion.
Now let me ask you a question. Why are former slaves content to live on their masters land, and live among them? Lynchings, the Tulsa massacre, the LA riots. and yet no move towards Black self-determination? I would want my own state, my own laws, and my own police. This talk of tolerance and equality is confusing to me when the Black community claims so much oppression.
To be honest, I don't care that a woman has a PhD. Good for her. In fact, I welcome it.
But in the bedroom, she had better put that PhD brain to good use, and get on her knees, and use her pretty lips to worship me. Because that is her most important job in a relationship. Everything else is secondary.
Paedophile here. Contrary to popular belief being a paedophile doesn't suddenly make you into some kind of monster who has an irresistible urge (or any urge whatsoever for that matter) to molest children. I am a normal person like any one of you and like most people I have a very healthy moral code. There is no inner battle within me on whether or not I should go rape a child. Like any sane person I recognise that doing so would be one of the most reprehensible acts I could ever do.
I go on google image search and find normal pictures of clothed cute little girls and then I fantasise and jack off to them. That's it. Nobody gets hurt and I am not going to apologise for it. My fantasies are not about some kind of horrible rape either but about consensual encounters (and I know that's not something that can happen in the real world, don't worry).
I also oppose the notion that paedophiles should seek therapy. I suppose you should do that if you feel you are a danger to kids but I think most paedophiles simply know that they aren't, so it's not a problem. Any person who actually molests children is probably not just a paedophile but also a sociopath and probably doesn't want help either way.
I do not and have never seen my paedophilia as a problem. I would not opt out of it if I could. I enjoy my fantasies a great deal and they give me a sense of beauty and pleasure I would not want to give up. You normal people, ask yourself if you would want to give up your attraction to adult women/men, or do you in fact love being aroused by them?
My dream is that I'll live long enough to see the invention of matrix-like simulations where I can have sex with virtual children. Most likely I'll die long before such a thing is invented. But hey, I'm OK with that. You take what you can get. Maybe a child sex doll at some point? Either way, it is surprisingly easy to not rape kids. Really. People who do that have much bigger problems than being a paedophile
-
completely understand you, but I don't see why you wouldn't want to opt out if you could.
You compare it with "normal people" giving up their attraction to adult women/men. I don't think you can compare it that easily, because we can have an actual relationship with an adult woman/man if we want to, while you can't have one with children.
TL;DR I accept, but don't understand you
I should say that I am also attracted to adult women. However if I had to chose to get rid of one part of my sexuality it would be adults. I'm a forever alone guy anyway so it wouldn't change much, I'm not bathing in pussy by any means.
As for why, I guess the pedo sexuality simply feels richer than the adult one. I like both girls and women physically (appearance wise). But girls have the added benefit of their cuteness and innocence, and the terrible terrible taboo of it just makes it more exciting. Women feel boring in comparison.
If you still don't understand me, think of it like this. Some guy only likes 2 types of music. Iron Maiden and Mozart. He hates all other music. Out of those two he likes Mozart more. He has to get rid of one of them though. If he keeps liking Iron Maiden he can go to their concerts because they are still alive. Mozart he can only listen to from his record player however. But he likes Mozart much more than he likes Iron Maiden. He could never give up Mozart because the thought of never getting to listen to those symphonies again feels terrible. Like a great loss of beauty that has come to define him as a person.
Hope that helps.
You wish. The more white people are exposed to the violence and degradation of diversity, the more they hate it. Diversity is associated with more school bullying, more violence against white people, more alienation, depression and degradation of civic institutions. It is positively associated with consumerism and mass surveillance. I guess it's better than being called racist though!
[ on an admitted pedophile working as an elementary school teacher ]
Is there anything unethical with a professor working in college where he is attracted to the students he teaches? Nope, as long as you can control your sexual urges, its not really a big deal. Now parents will definitely feel different and want you removed, but fuck them.
Well, my "peak trans" wasn't any one thing that I can remember. I never really lied to myself about people being able to change sex, but I didn't and still don't see a problem with folks dressing how they want, being called what they want etc. Is it a little insulting as a woman, a female, that men and males use their distorted view of us to define us? Of course. But it's hardly new. I suppose if I could pinpoint one too far moment, it would be the first time I heard someone say if you recognise biological reality, you're a bigot. I just can't understand what is wrong with saying "yeah, I'm male but I want to be a woman so I'm going to live my life as if I was one". How is that insulting to TW? It's their reality.
I'm also very worried by their tendency to lie and fudge figures to support their victimhood.The thing is, TRAs are alienating ppl who would otherwise support them by being grossly misogynistic, bullying and unaccepting of reality. I support them being free to live their lives in the open. I support them having safe spaces of their own. But that's not what they want. They don't want a safe space; they want OUR safe space. Well I'm sorry, that is not on. And if they stopped being so damn selfish they'd see how unreasonable a request (DEMAND) it is. Wanting ppl with penises (obv MALES) in female-only spaces is just too far for me.
My peak was the cotton ceiling, which breaks my heart all over again every time I read about it on here. It introduce me to the obvious: the regressive homophobia, gender roles and sexism in transgender ideology and how their followers unquestioning obedience and authoritarian tactics cannot create a society of equality and acceptance.
My biggest fear is the future that is being formed through this regressive and sexist ideology. The restrictions on discourse, toxic groupthink, lack of self awareness, non platforming, the echoed and rehearsed counter statements and encouragement of narcissism and virtue signaling to shame and control others don't seem like the behavior of those with a cohesive argument. The intimidation tactics (terf bats/doxxing), acceptance and encouragement of violence against your perceived enemies, the willful creation of a divided world to isolate and radicalize their followers, and the blaming of an oppressed class (in this case women) and not their true oppressor (cis men) all scream the behavior of a cult or a dictatorship and DEFINITELY NOT that of an altruistic movement for peace and equality.
I had a dream recently about one of those Summer camps for gay conversion therapy (which still exist!) that was struggling financially. In the dream it was bought by a transgender activist group to cure people of their "genital preferences." Maybe I am being paranoid.. I think it is an expression of my deep fear and heartbreak for our communities.
I am concerned for the rights and safety of both transgender people and women and only desire to live in a truly egalitarian world but somehow I am still afraid to post on here and might delete my account eventually. How has all of this changed so drastically in the last decade? Sorry for the run on sentences and platitudes and thank you to everyone who posts on and moderates this subreddit, it is nice to know there is hope.
The left is a cult that can only survive by cutting off information.
I was reading an askreddit thread about people who have left a cult "What was your oh**** moment?" If you go read that thread over there you will see one thing in common in all the cults. You are not allowed to think differently and to stop you from thinking differently they shut off all information from the outside. The left does exactly this. They are trying to silence conservatives to keep information away from their followers in the cult. If you think any unapproved thoughts you will be shunned from the group.
The left is a cult.
Edit: I went to sleep and came back. This post blew up. I am glad people see what the left really is. Also I saw a comment about how it is ironic to post this in a sub that censors leftists. What a ridiculous contradiction. We are on a completely leftist platform that censors right leaning subs, has special rules for our sub only, and removes gun subreddits. We are literally in the belly of the beast and you cult members want to come in to every single thread and try to brainwash us with your cult crap. Sorry but we are turning away the door knockers. We are here to try and save the people you are brainwashing. We are trying to pull people out of your cult. No we don't need to hear your 5000th anti-Trump post for the day here. You have a thousands subs to discuss that on. We have one. You have even taken over conservative subs in the past. If you want to argue your point of view go to askthe_donald. We have a dedicated sub for discussion.
Fun fact: Democrats also are far more likely to have mental health issues.
Fun fact: People in cults also are far more likely to have mental health issues.
Thus, cults can be seen as an organized group or a solitary person whose purpose is to dominate cult members by using psychological manipulation and pressure strategies.
The Japanese are some of the sickest, most racists pieces of shit on the planet. Someone who identifies with any medium of their culture is fucked.
Pretty much anyone who watches anime is some kind of creep. Wouldn’t be surprised to learn that most of them are pedos. Anime is such a trash form of entertainment. It pretty much only exists to sexualize women and children at this point.
You miss the most important point. Unlike immigrant countries, extroversion gene is not as prevalent in Asia. And Asian's rigorous education system filters out most people people. The ones who get to study abroad are most likely to be the most introverted ones in an introverted nation. The article states that the Chinese have different definition of friendship, which means that the introverts prefer intimate relationships, deep discussions, and one on one conversations. American party would be a torture for an introvert like me.
in august they're having a meeting to amend the constitution to take white farmland by force. the way liberals for years have said would never happen. now liberals seem to think this is going to nit destroy the economy and lead to famine and mass violence because reasons. because some black guy in SA wrote an article about how taking the land by force from the productive white minority will be a good thing.
south africa disproves every
notion of blacks being able to maintain a modern industrial society handed to them. let alone build one.
and they're already attacking whites. now they will be able to do it in uniform with official documentation. then, when the nation collapses entirely and my family and friends are all brutally murdered by black mobs, i'll get to read about how it isn't about race and what a great guy mandela was and how this is just as bad as apartheid (my people ever wanting to be kept separate from the black communist hordes that have ruined my country entirely and still want more)
[counterclockwise3]
Yes.
Similar to the dishonesty of trying to normalise taking quantities of cross-sex hormones for transition purposes by calling it HRT, 'hormone REPLACEMENT therapy'. You don't get to call it 'hormone replacement'. It's only 'replacement' in women, whose bodies naturally produced oestrogen through their adult lives, and are experiencing a diminishing because of menopause.
[owmygenderfeels]
Yes, I hate their appropriation of that term, too. They're not "replacing" anything, and they're shitting on everyone who actually needs hormone replacement therapy by equating actual physical medical conditions to genderfeels
response to "Wouldn't a world of ethnostates have more international wars?"
1) We have a lot of wars right now.
2) Mass immigration is conquest without bloodshed. I'd prefer it with blood shed tbqhwyf.
3) At least people would be fighting for their nation and not for special interest groups.
The battle is oppressive/imperialistic privateering nomadism vs pro-social collectivism
I was thinking about this and the entire issue is with nomads who refuse to respect peoples boundaries
Gypsies are bad people. They coincidentally are genetically related to the Dalit untouchables of India.
Considering both the pro-social Indians AND Europeans have issues and ostracized them independently it's stupid to but the blame on European/Indian behavior when the problem is clearly gypsies acting like assholes
This doesn't mean gypsies need to be genocided obviously; but it means gypsies ethno-culture in its current form is oppressive and anti-social in nature
Same with nomadic/globalist Jews and their gentile collaborators
The issue isn't with them existing but rather them disrespecting and harming others with their exploitative lifestyles
I believe the root of this is a social maturity thing and lack of responsibility, which is why the elites you see (both gentile and jewish) act like retarded children who can't control their emotions
(the_man_in_the_high)
Ideally from a White Nationalist point of view, is there any reason why you'd want any non-whites to exist?
After all, every non-white who exists takes away from the resources that a white person could utilize.
(CisHeteroScum)
Yes. I actually value human diversity. Its extremely interesting to observe the differences in our divergent evolution, and our uniqueness. It also gives world history and geopolitics a richer context.
Unlike a myopic and inconsistent leftist, I recognize the obvious fact that that "mulitculturalism" or "multiracialism" are not sustainable long-run options for any society. At best, this will achieve a boring, homogeneous, raceless world society that will have no distinctions - but in all likelihood you will just create sociopolitical dysfunction and a breakdown of public and private institutions where this ill-informed experiment is tried. Which is what we observe. And that is all assuming that "multiculturalism" is truly a benevolent ideological goal that just happens to only be the obligation of white countries.
After all, every non-white who exists takes away from the resources that a white person could utilize.
As if wanting my own nation and society defined by my race is the equivalent to wanting to be ever-expanding and ever-consuming. It's Malthusian, and it's wrong. I don't want all the resources that exist in the world, and we don't need them
(ChangeOfWind)
To a certain extent that is true; other people consume resources and pollute. In particular, atmospheric pollution is a problem: we can have whatever policies we want in our countries, if other countries pollute the atmosphere we also suffer.
But realistically other people have the same right to exist as we have. We don't want to exterminate animals either, despite them consuming resources too.
(the_man_in_the_high)
But aren't animals more like resources and less like people ? And it's not like animals are competing against human beings to get into Harvard. Mostly they just eat grass or eat each other -- most humans don't eat grass.
(BlinginLike3p0)
this is dumb as shit. do you think hardcore white supremacists want to kill all animals that are not a resource to humanity? the alt right doesnt want other races to fail, it just wants people to be able to exist and thrive without being dragged down or burdened by perceived obligations or debts to other races. I want the whole world to be successful.
Another theory on Race & IQ: Capitalism affects genetics.
I believed I've reached a new conclusion on why exactly do certain races perform differently but more importantly, what does IQ tell us about differences among similar races.
How I did this, ironically came from one argument I see posted on here. It was the "White Rhodesians defeat thousands of Black Gurrillas despite being outnumbered" argument. Now, that's suppose to be an argument that White & Black IQ differences were severe enough for Rhodesian to be handed a victory in war, which I don't deny. However, digging around, I also found another example of whites still massively slaughtering another enemy, but of the same skin color. That is, the Boer Wars in Africa.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Boer_War
Despite both Brits and Boers both sharing a common ancestry (Europe), why were the Boers able to massively resist the much larger British Army in the same fashion? Fast-forward 20 years later and the same thing nearly happens.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Boer_War
Of course, Britain later won yet looking at the casualties, it's disproportionately higher again with British dead compared to the Boers.
So what's the reason that Whites could still massively lose against other Whites if genetically they're both from the same region.
My answer: Money. Money can be used to naturally select for a smarter and more prosperous nation. This is because you're paying to get the best out of education, healthcare, technology that each new generation of people are expected to value and as a result, society becomes more intelligent.
But then you might say "so then why didn't British losses go down in the Second Boer War?".
The reason they won the war, is because they could afford it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Boer_War#Cost_of_the_war
Britain maintained colonies all over the world and were way past the industrialization stage. It took them 20 more years after their initial defeat, but they had a new generation of people who had become wealthier and most likely better trained, that they would be more ready for a victory.
This same inter race competition can also be seen in the Sino-Japanese wars.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Sino-Japanese_War
Both Chinese and Japanese are biologically similar, yet victory was still massively handed in Japan's favor. Again, why this happens is because Japan began selecting for a population of people who wanted to be apart of the industrial revolution. China was still stuck in its civil war stage and thus, could not leverage that same IQ selection that taking people out from the fields and employing them in cities that Japan was after.
So in conclusion, do race differences in IQ exist? Perhaps to a leaning strong yes. But what is more important is that all societies around the world need to form governments that are willing to foster a culture where money is spent on its own people so they can lift pass any biological limits and become just as successful as the richest countries that do exist.
This all happened a few years back, allow me to share.
Be me.
2010, was around 17.
Get summer job working at a tard camp which I later began to refer to as "The chromosome plantation".
For context. There were supposed to be groups of 15 tards (ages 6-13, some looked 21 though) with 2 wrangl- I mean counselors a piece. My partner went MIA day one so I was in a group of 30 with 2 other counselors, one was a 8/10 grill and the other was a pretty big black guy, we'll call them Dindu and qt3.14
Don't be Brainiac, one of the most evil tards I have ever seen. To this day I think he was an evil genius in disguise. He was short and had a clean buzz cut, probably around 12 years old but I am unfamiliar with Potato physiology so don't quote me on that.
Dindu wore a camo hunting vest with lots of pockets. This is important.
Lunch and potato debriefing as to camp rules was uneventful.
The tards learnt that counselors kept candies on them (lifesavers) to hand out to the tards.
Bring my XL serving of mashed potatoes over to a soccer field for the first event.
Brainiac started yelling that one of the kids was "huueghrting mhe". Note that he was in the middle of the group.
We couldn't actually confirm or deny this statement on sight because they were huddled together like penguins for heat.
Send Dindu in on a peace keeping mission.
He sets off to part the red sea.
As soon as he gets to the center of the crowd Braniac gives of the single most evil grin I have ever seen.
"Hhe hath candeh in hith pawckets"
theendtimes.mp4
The tards starts climbing him and patting him for candies.
It looked like Shadows of the Colossus the MMO.
MFW I remember qt3.14 kept all of the candies for our group in her purse.
Some started hurting him in frustration that they found no candy.
Biting, kicking, clawing.
It took us 10 minutes to liberate Dindu.
MFW he had to get 13 stitches.
[Two comments on an r/MGTOW thread about a photo of a woman wearing torn jeans]
jerseymayan
Whenever I see women wear ripped up clothes like that, I assume she has a rape fantasy. From her subconcious, it's not only about showing skin but having a Man rip her clothes off to get her "off."
GemStarCN21
Excellent analysis, I never thought of it like that.
The followers of any religion are extremists. They literally believe that proud atheists like you and I will burn in a pit of fire for eternity for our horrible transgression of free thinking.
Just because some of them aren't vocal about it doesn't mean they aren't thinking it. It is literally in their book of myths. They hate us because we think for ourselves. Why defend them?
The ratio of men to women is more important than the genetic quality or genetic fashionableness of the parents of males.
Even in a society that has nothing but what we would describe as 8/10+ looking males, if the female population is similar to the male population, female hypergamy would yield the same or very similar results to what we see today: the top 20% of those men would still get 80% of the sex, and the remaining 80% would still need to compete for money and status to become betabux. War never changes. Women are hypergamous, this is plainly obvious.
Men are objects to women. Women strongly desire and are primarily attracted to men that are perceived to be "better" or more fashionable than other men; Unlike males' objective assessment of feminine beauty where big tits are big tits, the female's assessment of male attractiveness is driven by how a given man can make herself look to other women in her culture. Even in a system where all the men were objectively good looking, if the female population is similar to the male population, the most fashionable looking males in that system will still attract women disproportionately until women have to resign and settle for betabux.
The only ways to curb hypergamy, the real problem, is to alter the ratio of men to women such that there are far fewer men than women, or have a culture centered around a religion that restricts hypergamy.
They as well as Taiwan and Korea have overtaken in academic performance. Is it down to culture? Partially. Is it a coincidence that genetically similar countries - Taiwan, Korea and Japan have a similar culture? No. Culture is largely a result of genetics as well as genetics being driven by culture. For example some children naturally focus in lessons, some naturally don't. Same goes for parents, some naturally value academic performance, some don't. The ratio between do and don't is naturally different in a general sense between different racial groups leading to different cultures.
Normie women are typically progressive, feminist liberals. They have to deal with this extreme cognitive dissonance. It's incongruous with their progressive ideals to be effectively eugenicist in the dating scene. It's incongruous with their feminist ideals to be lambasting toxic masculinity in the university feminist club during the afternoon, and fucking a high-T, dark-triad Chad that same night. It's incongruous with their perception of themselves as being morally superior that the fact that they reject ugly men has anything to do with their looks, so they rationalize by claiming that the ugly man had a deficient personality in some way or another.
The blackpill, as you say, would utterly destroy their world view. Personality is the tool by which women rationalize their incel-hatred and preserve a semblance of psychological consonance vis-a-vis their dating preferences and their political views.
Normie men are typically cucks and closet incels. Of course, they can't swallow the blackpill because they're not much higher in the dominance hierarchy than incels are. Your typical beta-male cuck just gets occasional strawfish sex from his girlfriend. The idea that she doesn't desire him or that she would leave him for an alpha upsets the beta-male greatly. Rather than channelling his anger in something productive, he pretends to be a pseudo-alpha by shitting on incels online. "Look at me, I've had sex, you loser", ignorant to the reality that as he's wasting away on /r/IncelTears, his girlfriend is letting Chad use all three of her holes in a single night. For the cuck, incel hatred and rejection of the blackpill is effectively a defence mechanism motivated by fear.
(in response to this quote)
@(the submitter)
I guess it depends what your moral framework is. I don't particularly care about being nice to people, I care about civilised nations being developed. Trying to raise up natives to be civilised is an incredibly slow process that's still not borne very great results to this day, in comparison to wiping them out and replacing them with Europeans, such as with Australia which is a highly successful modern country.
How very civilised of you...
You are not the saviours of the West. You are not the last champions of the Occident. You are the barbarian throwbacks trying to bring down Civilisation from within.
Compassion for the undeserving isn't what created the modern world, it's a decadent excess in its decline. The people who created modernity were by your standard 'barbaric' in their attitudes, which is why your standard is absurd.
Compassion isn't civilisation.
Australia is being nice to the remaining aboriginals, and the results are unimpressive. Meanwhile the colonists, who were originally criminals, are very civilised.
@(me)
Compassion for the undeserving isn't what created the modern world, it's a decadent excess in its decline.
Spoken like one indeed undeserving of compassion.
Our civilisation is neither decadent and decline. It's just that much of society has become complacent to your ilk.
The people who created modernity were by your standard 'barbaric' in their attitudes, which is why your standard is absurd.
They were still ahead of their times, and you would have hated them if they lived back then. Meanwhilel, your ideologies are quite literally the very antithesis of modernity, only exploiting and superficially supporting whatever seems useful for your vile goals and/or your ego.
The way I see it, economic and technological progress was the real progress, and changes to social values were usually a superficial thing that followed the 'real' progress, and have currently gone too far. Only in a few cases like the Reformation would I say that a moral change actually aided technological and economic advancement.
That's some funny trashtalking from both of us.
I like to only partly ironically talk about how I wish Thomas Paine had been executed for treason, and how it's a tragedy that Emperor Julian's attempted restoration of paganism against insurgent Christianity fizzled. So 'you would have hated them if they lived back then' is totally right.
I guess it depends what your moral framework is. I don't particularly care about being nice to people, I care about civilised nations being developed. Trying to raise up natives to be civilised is an incredibly slow process that's still not borne very great results to this day, in comparison to wiping them out and replacing them with Europeans, such as with Australia which is a highly successful modern country.
I also think it's a total travesty that we pay the oil-producing states on the Persian Gulf money for their oil. Mostly they use that money to subsidise their populations into obesity and uselessness, vanity projects, and terrorist financing. Ideally we should have reacted to the 1973 OPEC embargo with a full invasion and annexation followed, if necessary for the security of the oil production from guerilla activities, by ethnic cleansing.
Most of the people here seem to want to be somewhat isolationist and respect foreign sovereignty, but I think imperialism is completely worth it, at least over absurdly valuable areas like the Persian Gulf. It's completely absurd to pay so much money to people when you could just conquer them and take it for free. Unless of course their civilisation is worthwhile, but it's not.
First time posting here. Tomorrow is Women's March on my country, and the main issue is the approval of abortion laws and reproductive rights for women, which is amazing! But, guess who's included and strongly emphasized in it? Trans women. I'll go anyway because I want visibility of abortion and violence against women (actual women) but I get so disgusted from thinking that these dress wearing men are standing besides me and taking away something that only affects me (and all women alike) and bring focus on them.
Which they already have, since SRS and gender changing laws already exist and are completely free for them here. The worst thing is the backlash I received when I expressed my thoughts on it being only a women's issue, and not trans people. They do not experience womanhood, they only get the nice and cute part of "feminity", not periods, not the desperation of getting pregnant and having to either die trying to get an illegal abortion, or having a child they don't want, not oppression for having a vagina. I'm pretty sad.
Not really. If anything, he is rolling in his grave that his descendants follow stupid semitic sandpeople religions, not that some of them are oppressing another stupid semitic sandpeople religion.
Baha'ism is even more dangerous than Islam. It would totally dismantle the defenses and culture of our people.
It should rightly be suppressed. If its adherents don't like it, they can move to the "tolerant" west. They won't be missed.
[Comment under "If you glorify or defend a mass shooting, you get a ban"]
Stop being a triggered cuck. People trolling and shitposting is nothing to get authoritarian over. It'll fucking blow over in a week like it always does. If you are trying to save face because of normies they already think that we all support mass murdering and other such things and have shown no desire to change that opinion. You being a fag isn't going to change that.
This is reddit though so this type of shitty modding should be expected I guess.
Why I hate Black Women
They are the most arrogant, loud mouthed, undisplined and narcissistic femoids ever to exist.
Black femoids love saying how they are strong, independent and need of no man. Yet, go on moaning on how no one wants them and how they hate being single. The fact of the matter is that black femoids are the least desirable out of every race of femoid out there, yet for some reason they think that they are hot shit. Bitches, you ain't shit. So, stop acting all high and mighty.
They love to brag how they are "Black Queens" every 5 minutes or so, which I've never seen from any other race of femoid. Like, how fucking arrogant can you be to think yourself as queens and think that any man should treat you like one? You cunts aren't queens and you will never will be.
Black femoids also have the tendency of saying how they want a good man but for some reason they always hook up with some thug. Then they get pregnant with Tyrone's, Jamal's, Deshawn's, DeAndre's kids and bash men for not stepping up. Bitch, bash yourself for being low IQ slut. No wonder the single mother ratio is so high with you organisms.
They act like complete degenerates wherever they go -- it's fucking unbearable. Its unbelievable that a race of femoids such as black bitches can be so undisciplined. Which is why they should be put on leashes and cages.
I feel I was a responsible bully - never went too far, only targeted those whose behavior really needed changing. I used to give this kid shit for dressing like he was from the 80s and then one day he comes in dressed like a regular person. Another guy never spoke to anyone - after getting jumped a few times he got the idea that you need people who have your back in this life. Basically character-forming stuff.
All these anti-bullying programs have wussified schools to the point that there's no social pressure to confirm to any sort of normal behavior, and so we get things like bronies and trannies.
Those men have no need for shelters and social service programs, because rich and white.
What they do have need for is access to women's spaces and bodies for their own aggrandizement... which is why going into ladies bathrooms and gaslighting lesbians into having sex with trans is the primary focus of the trans activists of today.
[James Woods on Twitter: If the #Democrats manage to reverse this election with their usual dirty tricks, there will be #CivilWar. This is not going to end well.]
It will be a very brief war. Our side has most of the guns, cops, military, veterans, hunters, survivalists, essential infrastructure workers, food producers and truckers. It will end with the dems isolated in their cities, starving. And Donald J. Trump appointed Emperor for life. The left does not study history.
MO bishop convicted for failing to report child abuse; 1st US bishop convicted in such case
To be fair, I wouldn't also report it. Narcing is morally more despicable than anything the priest did (took a couple of photos).
