All do respect why are atheist people in this forum God please place me next to them at judgment day lol so many perverted versions of christianity only one acceptable version you either believe in Jesus and live for him or perish in hell
Re: twoxroasties wants you to be a compassionate cuck when your wife cucks you, births some chad's spawn, bails on you, and then leaves you to raise chad's spawn. women are a meme.
(C0nserve)
I had my suicide planned in case the day he would realize I wasn't worthy of his love because of my genetics would come
Roastie on leddit experiences 1% of the hardships of incel lifestyle and wants to rope already
(Brainlaid)
If you ever ascend, DNA test your kids.
Anyway, women don't have consciousness or empathy, she just isn't fucking capable of putting herself in someone else's shoes. It's all about how SHE FEELS and what happens to her.
(Administrative_Worth)
In their minds, them tricking yiu into rasing offspring is actually moral. You see that kid needs resources, it's a kid, it's pure, it's innocent, it deserves fulfillment. Plus she knows it's hers. Therefore she has even more bond to see it succeed and receive resources. Always get your kids tested. Honestly even chad should. Believe me, women cheat, a lot. If they think they can get away with it, and the guys worth it, they cheat. Fact of life.
(Deoxysxx)
I cant even call that man a cuck, he is more of a man than the real father
I'm happy to read this comment in this sub. I also wouldn't leave a little child behind if I have taken care of it for so many years. Cuck or not, if people can show mercy to random people through charity, then you can take care of one more kid. It's not the kid's fault.
Random charity does not mean being legally financially tied against your will to a person you were deceived into believing was your biological offspring. Don't even compare the two. They are nothing alike.
(grilledcheesaroo)
I can. He is a fucking cuck that willingly took unnecessary stress & partially ruined his own life over a whore's bastard daughter.
And you're no better, you fucking cuck. If you don't kick both the whore & her cheat trophy out; you are a fucking cuck. I have no respect for either.
His older parents tried speaking sense into this father but they raised a soft little feminized wimp.
(41PercentIsNotEnough)
Lmao all the comments defending him, this sub is infested by normies, fakecels, and cucks
To each their own
[A peace sign in rainbow colors]
Every color has its place. An ethnic home for every race.
Headline: Why are so many feminists obsessed with their genitals?
A lot of feminist stuff is associated with female genitalia. There are vagina monologues, vagina hats, vagina boats, paintings using period blood, yoghurt made out of vaginal yeast, etc.
You don't see MRAs do anything similar. Even the most extremist people in the manosphere don't do anything involving penises. The closest I've ever seen was the Wiener's Out thing in South Park, which was a parody.
I wonder why. The expected answer is that women's sexuality is oppressed and stuff, but I really don't see any social situation where penises are more appropriate than vaginas. In fact, it's the opposite: Female nudity is more socially acceptable than male nudity, whether it's in art or in real life. Women who flash their boobs or vaginas are met with cheers, while men who show their penises to people are arrested.
Granted, men do draw dicks on walls, but they don't really do it out of celebration of their masculinity, and it's considered more of a childish thing. Drawing dicks is mostly associated with juvenile humour, while the feminist vagina thing is supposedly classy and deep.
What are your thoughts?
[counterclockwise3]
Yes.
Similar to the dishonesty of trying to normalise taking quantities of cross-sex hormones for transition purposes by calling it HRT, 'hormone REPLACEMENT therapy'. You don't get to call it 'hormone replacement'. It's only 'replacement' in women, whose bodies naturally produced oestrogen through their adult lives, and are experiencing a diminishing because of menopause.
[owmygenderfeels]
Yes, I hate their appropriation of that term, too. They're not "replacing" anything, and they're shitting on everyone who actually needs hormone replacement therapy by equating actual physical medical conditions to genderfeels
response to "Wouldn't a world of ethnostates have more international wars?"
1) We have a lot of wars right now.
2) Mass immigration is conquest without bloodshed. I'd prefer it with blood shed tbqhwyf.
3) At least people would be fighting for their nation and not for special interest groups.
The battle is oppressive/imperialistic privateering nomadism vs pro-social collectivism
I was thinking about this and the entire issue is with nomads who refuse to respect peoples boundaries
Gypsies are bad people. They coincidentally are genetically related to the Dalit untouchables of India.
Considering both the pro-social Indians AND Europeans have issues and ostracized them independently it's stupid to but the blame on European/Indian behavior when the problem is clearly gypsies acting like assholes
This doesn't mean gypsies need to be genocided obviously; but it means gypsies ethno-culture in its current form is oppressive and anti-social in nature
Same with nomadic/globalist Jews and their gentile collaborators
The issue isn't with them existing but rather them disrespecting and harming others with their exploitative lifestyles
I believe the root of this is a social maturity thing and lack of responsibility, which is why the elites you see (both gentile and jewish) act like retarded children who can't control their emotions
(the_man_in_the_high)
Ideally from a White Nationalist point of view, is there any reason why you'd want any non-whites to exist?
After all, every non-white who exists takes away from the resources that a white person could utilize.
(CisHeteroScum)
Yes. I actually value human diversity. Its extremely interesting to observe the differences in our divergent evolution, and our uniqueness. It also gives world history and geopolitics a richer context.
Unlike a myopic and inconsistent leftist, I recognize the obvious fact that that "mulitculturalism" or "multiracialism" are not sustainable long-run options for any society. At best, this will achieve a boring, homogeneous, raceless world society that will have no distinctions - but in all likelihood you will just create sociopolitical dysfunction and a breakdown of public and private institutions where this ill-informed experiment is tried. Which is what we observe. And that is all assuming that "multiculturalism" is truly a benevolent ideological goal that just happens to only be the obligation of white countries.
After all, every non-white who exists takes away from the resources that a white person could utilize.
As if wanting my own nation and society defined by my race is the equivalent to wanting to be ever-expanding and ever-consuming. It's Malthusian, and it's wrong. I don't want all the resources that exist in the world, and we don't need them
(ChangeOfWind)
To a certain extent that is true; other people consume resources and pollute. In particular, atmospheric pollution is a problem: we can have whatever policies we want in our countries, if other countries pollute the atmosphere we also suffer.
But realistically other people have the same right to exist as we have. We don't want to exterminate animals either, despite them consuming resources too.
(the_man_in_the_high)
But aren't animals more like resources and less like people ? And it's not like animals are competing against human beings to get into Harvard. Mostly they just eat grass or eat each other -- most humans don't eat grass.
(BlinginLike3p0)
this is dumb as shit. do you think hardcore white supremacists want to kill all animals that are not a resource to humanity? the alt right doesnt want other races to fail, it just wants people to be able to exist and thrive without being dragged down or burdened by perceived obligations or debts to other races. I want the whole world to be successful.
Another theory on Race & IQ: Capitalism affects genetics.
I believed I've reached a new conclusion on why exactly do certain races perform differently but more importantly, what does IQ tell us about differences among similar races.
How I did this, ironically came from one argument I see posted on here. It was the "White Rhodesians defeat thousands of Black Gurrillas despite being outnumbered" argument. Now, that's suppose to be an argument that White & Black IQ differences were severe enough for Rhodesian to be handed a victory in war, which I don't deny. However, digging around, I also found another example of whites still massively slaughtering another enemy, but of the same skin color. That is, the Boer Wars in Africa.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Boer_War
Despite both Brits and Boers both sharing a common ancestry (Europe), why were the Boers able to massively resist the much larger British Army in the same fashion? Fast-forward 20 years later and the same thing nearly happens.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Boer_War
Of course, Britain later won yet looking at the casualties, it's disproportionately higher again with British dead compared to the Boers.
So what's the reason that Whites could still massively lose against other Whites if genetically they're both from the same region.
My answer: Money. Money can be used to naturally select for a smarter and more prosperous nation. This is because you're paying to get the best out of education, healthcare, technology that each new generation of people are expected to value and as a result, society becomes more intelligent.
But then you might say "so then why didn't British losses go down in the Second Boer War?".
The reason they won the war, is because they could afford it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Boer_War#Cost_of_the_war
Britain maintained colonies all over the world and were way past the industrialization stage. It took them 20 more years after their initial defeat, but they had a new generation of people who had become wealthier and most likely better trained, that they would be more ready for a victory.
This same inter race competition can also be seen in the Sino-Japanese wars.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Sino-Japanese_War
Both Chinese and Japanese are biologically similar, yet victory was still massively handed in Japan's favor. Again, why this happens is because Japan began selecting for a population of people who wanted to be apart of the industrial revolution. China was still stuck in its civil war stage and thus, could not leverage that same IQ selection that taking people out from the fields and employing them in cities that Japan was after.
So in conclusion, do race differences in IQ exist? Perhaps to a leaning strong yes. But what is more important is that all societies around the world need to form governments that are willing to foster a culture where money is spent on its own people so they can lift pass any biological limits and become just as successful as the richest countries that do exist.
This all happened a few years back, allow me to share.
Be me.
2010, was around 17.
Get summer job working at a tard camp which I later began to refer to as "The chromosome plantation".
For context. There were supposed to be groups of 15 tards (ages 6-13, some looked 21 though) with 2 wrangl- I mean counselors a piece. My partner went MIA day one so I was in a group of 30 with 2 other counselors, one was a 8/10 grill and the other was a pretty big black guy, we'll call them Dindu and qt3.14
Don't be Brainiac, one of the most evil tards I have ever seen. To this day I think he was an evil genius in disguise. He was short and had a clean buzz cut, probably around 12 years old but I am unfamiliar with Potato physiology so don't quote me on that.
Dindu wore a camo hunting vest with lots of pockets. This is important.
Lunch and potato debriefing as to camp rules was uneventful.
The tards learnt that counselors kept candies on them (lifesavers) to hand out to the tards.
Bring my XL serving of mashed potatoes over to a soccer field for the first event.
Brainiac started yelling that one of the kids was "huueghrting mhe". Note that he was in the middle of the group.
We couldn't actually confirm or deny this statement on sight because they were huddled together like penguins for heat.
Send Dindu in on a peace keeping mission.
He sets off to part the red sea.
As soon as he gets to the center of the crowd Braniac gives of the single most evil grin I have ever seen.
"Hhe hath candeh in hith pawckets"
theendtimes.mp4
The tards starts climbing him and patting him for candies.
It looked like Shadows of the Colossus the MMO.
MFW I remember qt3.14 kept all of the candies for our group in her purse.
Some started hurting him in frustration that they found no candy.
Biting, kicking, clawing.
It took us 10 minutes to liberate Dindu.
MFW he had to get 13 stitches.
[Two comments on an r/MGTOW thread about a photo of a woman wearing torn jeans]
jerseymayan
Whenever I see women wear ripped up clothes like that, I assume she has a rape fantasy. From her subconcious, it's not only about showing skin but having a Man rip her clothes off to get her "off."
GemStarCN21
Excellent analysis, I never thought of it like that.
The followers of any religion are extremists. They literally believe that proud atheists like you and I will burn in a pit of fire for eternity for our horrible transgression of free thinking.
Just because some of them aren't vocal about it doesn't mean they aren't thinking it. It is literally in their book of myths. They hate us because we think for ourselves. Why defend them?
The ratio of men to women is more important than the genetic quality or genetic fashionableness of the parents of males.
Even in a society that has nothing but what we would describe as 8/10+ looking males, if the female population is similar to the male population, female hypergamy would yield the same or very similar results to what we see today: the top 20% of those men would still get 80% of the sex, and the remaining 80% would still need to compete for money and status to become betabux. War never changes. Women are hypergamous, this is plainly obvious.
Men are objects to women. Women strongly desire and are primarily attracted to men that are perceived to be "better" or more fashionable than other men; Unlike males' objective assessment of feminine beauty where big tits are big tits, the female's assessment of male attractiveness is driven by how a given man can make herself look to other women in her culture. Even in a system where all the men were objectively good looking, if the female population is similar to the male population, the most fashionable looking males in that system will still attract women disproportionately until women have to resign and settle for betabux.
The only ways to curb hypergamy, the real problem, is to alter the ratio of men to women such that there are far fewer men than women, or have a culture centered around a religion that restricts hypergamy.
They as well as Taiwan and Korea have overtaken in academic performance. Is it down to culture? Partially. Is it a coincidence that genetically similar countries - Taiwan, Korea and Japan have a similar culture? No. Culture is largely a result of genetics as well as genetics being driven by culture. For example some children naturally focus in lessons, some naturally don't. Same goes for parents, some naturally value academic performance, some don't. The ratio between do and don't is naturally different in a general sense between different racial groups leading to different cultures.
Normie women are typically progressive, feminist liberals. They have to deal with this extreme cognitive dissonance. It's incongruous with their progressive ideals to be effectively eugenicist in the dating scene. It's incongruous with their feminist ideals to be lambasting toxic masculinity in the university feminist club during the afternoon, and fucking a high-T, dark-triad Chad that same night. It's incongruous with their perception of themselves as being morally superior that the fact that they reject ugly men has anything to do with their looks, so they rationalize by claiming that the ugly man had a deficient personality in some way or another.
The blackpill, as you say, would utterly destroy their world view. Personality is the tool by which women rationalize their incel-hatred and preserve a semblance of psychological consonance vis-a-vis their dating preferences and their political views.
Normie men are typically cucks and closet incels. Of course, they can't swallow the blackpill because they're not much higher in the dominance hierarchy than incels are. Your typical beta-male cuck just gets occasional strawfish sex from his girlfriend. The idea that she doesn't desire him or that she would leave him for an alpha upsets the beta-male greatly. Rather than channelling his anger in something productive, he pretends to be a pseudo-alpha by shitting on incels online. "Look at me, I've had sex, you loser", ignorant to the reality that as he's wasting away on /r/IncelTears, his girlfriend is letting Chad use all three of her holes in a single night. For the cuck, incel hatred and rejection of the blackpill is effectively a defence mechanism motivated by fear.
(in response to this quote)
@(the submitter)
I guess it depends what your moral framework is. I don't particularly care about being nice to people, I care about civilised nations being developed. Trying to raise up natives to be civilised is an incredibly slow process that's still not borne very great results to this day, in comparison to wiping them out and replacing them with Europeans, such as with Australia which is a highly successful modern country.
How very civilised of you...
You are not the saviours of the West. You are not the last champions of the Occident. You are the barbarian throwbacks trying to bring down Civilisation from within.
Compassion for the undeserving isn't what created the modern world, it's a decadent excess in its decline. The people who created modernity were by your standard 'barbaric' in their attitudes, which is why your standard is absurd.
Compassion isn't civilisation.
Australia is being nice to the remaining aboriginals, and the results are unimpressive. Meanwhile the colonists, who were originally criminals, are very civilised.
@(me)
Compassion for the undeserving isn't what created the modern world, it's a decadent excess in its decline.
Spoken like one indeed undeserving of compassion.
Our civilisation is neither decadent and decline. It's just that much of society has become complacent to your ilk.
The people who created modernity were by your standard 'barbaric' in their attitudes, which is why your standard is absurd.
They were still ahead of their times, and you would have hated them if they lived back then. Meanwhilel, your ideologies are quite literally the very antithesis of modernity, only exploiting and superficially supporting whatever seems useful for your vile goals and/or your ego.
The way I see it, economic and technological progress was the real progress, and changes to social values were usually a superficial thing that followed the 'real' progress, and have currently gone too far. Only in a few cases like the Reformation would I say that a moral change actually aided technological and economic advancement.
That's some funny trashtalking from both of us.
I like to only partly ironically talk about how I wish Thomas Paine had been executed for treason, and how it's a tragedy that Emperor Julian's attempted restoration of paganism against insurgent Christianity fizzled. So 'you would have hated them if they lived back then' is totally right.
I guess it depends what your moral framework is. I don't particularly care about being nice to people, I care about civilised nations being developed. Trying to raise up natives to be civilised is an incredibly slow process that's still not borne very great results to this day, in comparison to wiping them out and replacing them with Europeans, such as with Australia which is a highly successful modern country.
I also think it's a total travesty that we pay the oil-producing states on the Persian Gulf money for their oil. Mostly they use that money to subsidise their populations into obesity and uselessness, vanity projects, and terrorist financing. Ideally we should have reacted to the 1973 OPEC embargo with a full invasion and annexation followed, if necessary for the security of the oil production from guerilla activities, by ethnic cleansing.
Most of the people here seem to want to be somewhat isolationist and respect foreign sovereignty, but I think imperialism is completely worth it, at least over absurdly valuable areas like the Persian Gulf. It's completely absurd to pay so much money to people when you could just conquer them and take it for free. Unless of course their civilisation is worthwhile, but it's not.
First time posting here. Tomorrow is Women's March on my country, and the main issue is the approval of abortion laws and reproductive rights for women, which is amazing! But, guess who's included and strongly emphasized in it? Trans women. I'll go anyway because I want visibility of abortion and violence against women (actual women) but I get so disgusted from thinking that these dress wearing men are standing besides me and taking away something that only affects me (and all women alike) and bring focus on them.
Which they already have, since SRS and gender changing laws already exist and are completely free for them here. The worst thing is the backlash I received when I expressed my thoughts on it being only a women's issue, and not trans people. They do not experience womanhood, they only get the nice and cute part of "feminity", not periods, not the desperation of getting pregnant and having to either die trying to get an illegal abortion, or having a child they don't want, not oppression for having a vagina. I'm pretty sad.
Not really. If anything, he is rolling in his grave that his descendants follow stupid semitic sandpeople religions, not that some of them are oppressing another stupid semitic sandpeople religion.
Baha'ism is even more dangerous than Islam. It would totally dismantle the defenses and culture of our people.
It should rightly be suppressed. If its adherents don't like it, they can move to the "tolerant" west. They won't be missed.
[Comment under "If you glorify or defend a mass shooting, you get a ban"]
Stop being a triggered cuck. People trolling and shitposting is nothing to get authoritarian over. It'll fucking blow over in a week like it always does. If you are trying to save face because of normies they already think that we all support mass murdering and other such things and have shown no desire to change that opinion. You being a fag isn't going to change that.
This is reddit though so this type of shitty modding should be expected I guess.
Why I hate Black Women
They are the most arrogant, loud mouthed, undisplined and narcissistic femoids ever to exist.
Black femoids love saying how they are strong, independent and need of no man. Yet, go on moaning on how no one wants them and how they hate being single. The fact of the matter is that black femoids are the least desirable out of every race of femoid out there, yet for some reason they think that they are hot shit. Bitches, you ain't shit. So, stop acting all high and mighty.
They love to brag how they are "Black Queens" every 5 minutes or so, which I've never seen from any other race of femoid. Like, how fucking arrogant can you be to think yourself as queens and think that any man should treat you like one? You cunts aren't queens and you will never will be.
Black femoids also have the tendency of saying how they want a good man but for some reason they always hook up with some thug. Then they get pregnant with Tyrone's, Jamal's, Deshawn's, DeAndre's kids and bash men for not stepping up. Bitch, bash yourself for being low IQ slut. No wonder the single mother ratio is so high with you organisms.
They act like complete degenerates wherever they go -- it's fucking unbearable. Its unbelievable that a race of femoids such as black bitches can be so undisciplined. Which is why they should be put on leashes and cages.
I feel I was a responsible bully - never went too far, only targeted those whose behavior really needed changing. I used to give this kid shit for dressing like he was from the 80s and then one day he comes in dressed like a regular person. Another guy never spoke to anyone - after getting jumped a few times he got the idea that you need people who have your back in this life. Basically character-forming stuff.
All these anti-bullying programs have wussified schools to the point that there's no social pressure to confirm to any sort of normal behavior, and so we get things like bronies and trannies.
Those men have no need for shelters and social service programs, because rich and white.
What they do have need for is access to women's spaces and bodies for their own aggrandizement... which is why going into ladies bathrooms and gaslighting lesbians into having sex with trans is the primary focus of the trans activists of today.
[James Woods on Twitter: If the #Democrats manage to reverse this election with their usual dirty tricks, there will be #CivilWar. This is not going to end well.]
It will be a very brief war. Our side has most of the guns, cops, military, veterans, hunters, survivalists, essential infrastructure workers, food producers and truckers. It will end with the dems isolated in their cities, starving. And Donald J. Trump appointed Emperor for life. The left does not study history.
MO bishop convicted for failing to report child abuse; 1st US bishop convicted in such case
To be fair, I wouldn't also report it. Narcing is morally more despicable than anything the priest did (took a couple of photos).
There is nothing inherently harmful or immoral about having sex with children CMV
There are a number of arguments used by proponents of the prevailing cultural mythology on the subject:
1. Children are psychologically damaged by sexual activity
Sex is an inherently pleasurable activity- the claim that children are inherently "harmed" or "traumatized" by sex is demonstrably false, supported by no scientific research, and is essentially absurd, as children are not asexual (a point I will address later).
"The self-reported effects data contradict the conclusions or implications presented in previous literature reviews that harmful effects stemming from CSA are pervasive and intense in the population of persons with this experience. Baker and Duncan (1985) found that, although some respondents reported permanent harm stemming from their CSA experiences (4% of males and 13% of females), the overwhelming majority did not (96% of males and 87% of females). Severe or intense harm would be expected to linger into adulthood, but this did not occur for most respondents in this national sample, according to their self-reports, contradicting the conclusion or implication of intense harm stemming from CSA in the typical case. Meta-analyses of CSA-adjustment relations from the five national studies that reported results of adjustment measures revealed a consistent pattern: SA respondents were less well adjusted than control respondents. Importantly, however, the size of this difference (i.e., effect size) was consistently small in the case of both males and females. The unbiased effect size estimate for males and females combined was ru = .08, which indicates that CSA, assuming that it was responsible for the adjustment difference between SA and control respondents, did not produce intense problems on average."
Rind, Bruce & Tromovitch, Philip (1997). "A meta-analytic review of findings from national samples on psychological correlates of child sexual abuse," Journal of Sex Research, 34, 237-255.
The Rind meta-analysis is peer-reviewed, and its conclusion has not been discredited to date.
Often, when psychological damage does occur, it is not the result of the act itself, but rather the result of society's reaction to it:
Nelson's relationship marked "the happiest period of [her] life." "When I was a child I experienced an ongoing incestuous relationship that seemed to me to be caring and beneficial in nature. There were love and healthy self-actualization in what I perceived to be a safe environment. Suddenly one day I discerned from playground talk at school that what I was doing might be "bad". Fearing that I might, indeed, be a "bad" person, I went to my mother for reassurance. The ensuing traumatic incidents of that day inaugurated a 30-year period of psychological and emotional dysfunction that reduced family communication to mere utilitarian process and established severe limits on my subsequent developmental journey."
Sexologist Joan A. Nelson in Children and Sex, on her relationship with an adult cousin at 8 years of age December, 1981
In other words, if the prevailing belief was not that having sex as a child is the worst thing that could possibly happen, psychological issues stemming from childhood sexual experience would lessen drastically.
2. Children are essentially asexual
This is false. The orgasmic reflex develops in the womb:
"We recently observed a female fetus at 32 weeks' gestation touching the vulva with the fingers of the right hand. The caressing movements were centered primarily on the region of the clitoris. Movements stopped after 30 to 40 seconds and started again after a few minutes. Furthermore, these slight touches were repeated and were associated with short, rapid movements of pelvis and legs. After another break, in addition to this behavior, the fetus contracted the muscles of the trunk and limbs, and then clonicotonic movements of the whole body followed. Finally, she relaxed and rested.
We observed this behavior for about 20 minutes. The mother was an active and interested witness, conversing with observers about her child's experience.
Evidence of male fetuses' excitement reflex in utero, such as erection or ?masturbation” movements, has been previously reported.
The current observation seems to show not only that the excitement reflex can be evoked in female fetuses at the third trimester of gestation but also that the orgasmic reflex can be elicited during intrauterine life. This would agree with the physiologic features of female sexuality: The female sexual response is separate from reproductive functions and doesn't need a full sexual maturity to be explicit."
Giorgi, Giorgio, and Siccardi, Marco (1996). "Ultrasonographic observation of a female fetus' sexual behavior in utero," American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 175, 3(1, part 1), 753.
"In a 1999 study of undergraduate students, 5.2% of females and 12.8% of males reported having engaged in sex play with their peers involving genital contact before elementary school, and that 1.3% of girls and 4.0% of boys had engaged in sex play involving anal/genital insertion (with objects or fingers) or oral-genital intercourse before elementary school. By the end of elementary school, the numbers increased to 29.2% for females and 32.9% for males for genital contact and 12.3 for girls and 10.1% for boys for insertion or oral sex. Very little pressure and almost no coercion were reported."
Reynolds, M.A., Herbenick, D. L., & Bancroft, J. (2003). The nature of childhood sexual experiences: Two studies 50 years apart. In J. Bancroft (Ed.), Sexual Development in Childhood (pp. 134-155). Indiana: Indiana University Press.
If children masturbate, orgasm, and have sex with each other, it is absurd to claim they are asexual.
3. Children cannot consent, and therefore having sex with children is rape, and we all know rape is harmful and immoral
Consent refers to the provision of agreement- if children are capable of initiating sexual activity, it is nonsensical to claim they cannot consent to it.
For example, in the animal kingdom, which has no taboo on childhood sexuality, sex between adult and children is common:
"Both adult males and females interact sexually with adolescents and juveniles (three-to-nine-year-olds). In fact, young females go through a five-to-six-year period sometimes referred to as ADOLESCENT STERILITY (although no pathology is involved) during which they actively participate in heterosexual mating (often with adults) but never get pregnant. Sexual behavior between adults and infants of both sexes is common - about a third of the time it is initiated by the infant and may involve genital rubbing and full copulatory postures (including penetration of an adult female by a male infant). (Biological Exuberance - 274)
Who is raping whom when the infant initiate sexual activity? Does the infant rape itself or does the adult rape the infant by not denying it sexual gratification?
3a. Children lack the ability to make informed consent
Sex is not some kind of complex and incomprehensible activity that requires a lot of knowledge to preform correctly- it is one of the simplest things in existence. Animals surely don't "understand" what sex is, yet it would be absurd to say all sex between animals is harmful or immoral.
5. This thread is disgusting and so are you.
This is not an argument.
Note that even though there is nothing inherently harmful about having sex with children, in our sex-negative culture, it very often is- see Joan A Nelson's quote above for an example. The harm did not come about from the sex itself, but from society's reaction to it- but regardless, it is still grossly immoral to risk ruining a child's life for the sake of an orgasm, even if the damage comes from iatrogenic sources.
So I'm not saying it's OK to have sex with children in this day and age- it most certainly is not. But the only reason it isn't is because of society's hysterical, unscientific, and maladaptive attitude towards this subject- if this were different, I see no reason why engaging in a harmless and mutually pleasurable activity with a child would be either harmful or immoral.
[Comment under "New SJW tactic : AHS combats "hate" by publicly laughing at an incel who is considering suicide."]
I'm not saying some rape from time to time is not justified, but certainly not to the extent /r/incels talks about it. /u/caamib is scary.
Tried to rape his mom. Now has plans to rape his daughter. But would you rather he exposed himself on Reddit, or just went on to do it in his country where nobody would care? I believe in giving degenerates enough rope to hang themselves (figuratively). I also believe in actually hanging them in some cases.
Bullying is a good thing
I am a supporter of traditional bullying; things like name calling and locking in lockers and wedgies. This is different than some modern bullying, like hacking into someone's phone and sharing their nudes with the entire school; as that is clearly on a different level.
But I believe that for children, bullying helps teach them ways to cope with those types of people and toughens them up as people. Kids who get bullied should learn how to block out negative influences and to have thick skin; and eventually to stand up and do something to stop it, providing a life lesson and strengthening them as a person.
Trying to protect kids from bullies or stop bullying from happening (which will never work) just teaches kids to be victims, which creates weak adults. These victim children turn into adults that can't stand up for themselves to a boss or assertive co-worker, and continue to play the victim their entire lives instead of achieving personal growth.
Speaking of adults, adult bullying doesn't exist. Once you're an adult you are capable of figuring out how to either stand up to the person or find a way to remove yourself from the situation. Bullying is term for children and doesn't apply to adults, in the same way an adult wouldn't call someone they're interested in their "crush".
And for the record, I was bullied for being overweight most of my life. This opinion comes from my own ability to learn to cope with these "bullies".
TL;DR: bullying makes kids stronger and teaches them not to act like victims their entire lives
Fuck white women
We live in a time where every race of men desire white femoids more than their own race of femoids, in which has created not only a huge imbalance, but has also increased white femoids egos tenfold: white bitches are now officially every mans whore.
We all know the answer as to why men exclusively seek white femoids: because they are more attractive than femoids of color. (Anyone who denies this fact is an idiot.) The average white cunt has a much larger appeal than the average black, brown or asian femoid. Just accept it.
But, despite how good looking they maybe, none of them are relationship material. They are extremely entitled, shallow and have huge egos. Not only they know that even the most ugliest one of them could have a huge horde of oribiters pursuing them, they know that men will do anything just to get a piece their yeast filled roast beefs.
White femoids have a thing about aspiring to be sluts in an early age thinking how being promiscuous is empowering for them. This is one of the main reasons why they can't be loyal or trustworthy partners in a relationship. I mean, just think about it: after rampant years of promiciousty one does not simply go into monogamous relationship. These vapid cunts are also known alot to cucking and cheating on their partners with people who are more good looking or rich.
Degeneracy is also very rampant with them. They have no problem fucking animals and doing god knows what with them. Oh, and not to mention the gold digging. If you have money, no matter how ugly you're, they'll want you. But they'll fuck chad from the side while showing a charade of affection at you. So, prepared to get cucked while at it.
The only thing these sluts are good for is pumping and dumping. Anything other than that is a clear waste of time.
with the exception of pol pot - who was a CIA stooge and defeated by communists - it's straight up dishonest history to describe those communist regimes as genocidal.
We live in dark times
Ugly men are roaming the streets, living their sick, demented lives. These monsters have no boundaries, they literally talk to women at social places. And what's worse, they say things like "hey" and "want to go out with me?" The government won't step in and do something. Women live in constant fear, all because of these ugly men. These men can't take no for an answer. Obviously it doesn't matter that the woman never said no, she was too horrified to open her mouth and the ugly brute was too dumb to read her mind. And the consequences are only more sever if she does say no. Women are murdered at a startling rate for literally being forward and rejecting a man. Soon, it will be too late, and women will have no choice but to go on dates with these men. All of this could have been adverted, if only ugly men knew their place. I blame our patriarchal society for letting these men exist.
Women are wimps
They're all cowards. It's surprising that they can function at all. The naivety, the inability to back up anything without other women/numales. They can't take what they dish out. They are always the victims, society has shown to that. They doubt, overthink, hesitate. They are missing the sharpness that would help them succeed. Their answer to this is to punish the brave and confident. To reward the content. The risk takers, the best humanity has to offer, are often the targets of women.
I have little hope for the future with them leading the way.
Rule of thumb:
* If a woman is at the gym, don't hit on her.
* if a woman is in class, don't hit on her.
* if a woman is at the store, don't hit on her.
* if a woman is at church, don't hit on her.
* If a woman is at work, definitely don't hit on her.
* if a woman is walking late at night or in a parking lot, DO NOT HIT ON HER OR RUN REALLY FAST BEHIND HER. She will actually think you're trying to murder her.
Really, just be out in the day, do your normal routine, and see if the woman makes eye contact with you repeatedly (don't stare, but occasionally glance over at odd second intervals). If she does, walk up slowly and say hi in a timid voice, introduce yourself and ask about what she is doing (if at a coffee shop, ask about her drink). Bring out your phone and white knight on reddit.
Make light banter while defending women. If she's looking like she wants to leave (holding tight to her bag, glancing away, checking her phone, blinking quickly, breathing rapidly) wish her a good day (m'lady) and leave quickly. If she curls her hair behind her ear, makes direct eye contact a lot, and smiles--get those digits.
One more Try. Females interested in donating sex to incels, post here or PM one of the mods. We will find an incel in your area.
Of course, the last time this happened, we had to delete the post because multiple women used the thread to find thirsty normies to have sex with(looking at you, /u/retruk).
Any thirsty nu male posting here will have his post removed and banned on sight. Incels, post your location in the comments if you desire sex from a rare, kind, and caring woman. Women, post your location or PM the mods as I said up in the title.
Women havent changed or been corrupted, they are what they have always been. Women will do what men let them get away with. They are like hedonistic children. This is important for the raising of children and mate selection but it is like men's dominant nature, it needs to be controlled.
Take away government programs, diversity hires, their right to vote, and stop tailoring education to girls and the problem will disappear.
Most chronic illnesses are genetic to at least some extent. If we make healthcare "free" anywhere it ruins the last little bit of natural selection we have. The chronically ill will breed, create more chronicially ill, and so on and so forth until their are too many to support and it topples the whole system.
Also, when you make healthcare universal you are stealing from me at gunpoint to pay for it. It is immoral.
...
I dont want to pay for any public health care. It is all immoral and bad for the species.
No evidence that many chronic illnesses are in part genetic? That is ludicrous. Everything about every living creature is mostly or partially genetic. Next, youll be telling me Im 6'3 because of my environment.
Women need to have their right to vote removed and we need to stop tailoring our education system to them or they wont have kids.
I dont know what IQ test theyve used to "prove" women are now smarter than men but i guarantee it isnt g loaded whatsoever. Or they did the testing at 12-14 before the boys had hit puberty but after the girls had. Either one would make the results invalid. It would make no sense from an evolutionary perspective for women to be smarter than men. For 99% of human existence all women did was raise children while men did everything else. Also, if it was the case you would see more female inventors. 99% are male and mostly white.
Women are in colleges in greater numbers now for the same reason non whites (other than asians) are. Diversity quotas. I had an SAT score in the top .1% of the country and yet was denied scholarships to every ivy leage school i was accepted into (all of them). Their reason? They were "looking for a more diverse selection of recipients." So I didnt get to go because Im a white man.
Our education system is also tailored to girls. This is why almost all riddlin perscriptions are to boys. They are punished with microdoses of meth for not acting like girls.
The flynn effect is bullshit because it says just a few hundred years ago all europeans had mentally retarded levels of IQ. You cant run a functioning society with those people, look at Africa for a reference. Also, mass intelligence testing wasnt done until the first world war so everything before that is a guess.
Any gains made in IQ since then are due to nutrition. This is why i think you can get a malnourished persons IQ up about 10 points. However, no one is malnourished in the west and yet the racial gap here persists. Care to explain that to me? Im sure its still somehow whitey's fault.
...
I feel slighted because I did better than 99.9% of the country in everything academic and yet was denied scholarships, restricting my ability to attend the college of my choice even though I earned it, because of my race and gender.
I am not an introvert. I wasnt just great at academia. Im also a musician who sings and plays in a band and was quite the athlete. Im bigger than 99% of humans (if you dont count fat ones when it comes to weight) at 6'3 and 205lbs so that was a big advantage in highschool sports though.
Ive known many women all my life. Ive always casually dated and had many friends of every gender.
You have my motives entirely wrong. I do not feel insecure. I am not hurt by minorities performing better than me. For instance, i am completely comfortable with the fact that east asians are smarter than whites on average. I do not want to discriminate based on race for any reason. I only use the data to explain broad scale differences between groups. If it isnt inherent then it is white people's fault. As long as the latter is the dominant opinion among the public I will fight for the truth.
We will never see eye to eye. I believe my data is obviously right and fits with evolution and observable reality. You will most likely never break your egalitarian fantasy. It was fun though. You gave me a bit to think about and new things to incorporate into my arguments.
The secret to a high birth rate is to take womens rights away. Don't throw them in niqabs and beat them or anything. Just make sure men are preferred for education and work. Men are better at everything anyway so it would make sense.
[Comment under "Italy reject the migrants welcome meme, vote for right and center-right parties in 2018 elections."]
I think Casa Pound could be fairly be descibed as far right or fascist. I don't think even they deny it, I mean they even throw roman salutes and CP is named after Ezra Pound, a fanatical antisemite who referred to Hitler as a "saint". I'm not saying this to attack them in any way, shape or form. I don't hold it against them, if I had like a million muslims flood my country and they were raping and dismembering little girls and no one was doing anything about it, I'd turn to radical measures as well. Just throwing this out there because I don't think denying it does anyone any favors. Apparently according to the polls they did well and looks like they're making it to the parliament. Congratulations Italian nationalists!
The movement is not sustainable. The ideology is inherently flawed. I have yet to hear any convincing logical arguments to support trans-ideology. The best effort I've seen is the citation of studies on the "ladybrain" argument, but there are so few of those studies and they are so flawed, so the citation of junk science isn't going to cut it.
They will continue to alienate LGB people and while LBGT media and activism groups don't seem to care that their sexual orientation is yet again being invalidated, individual people will care and while it hasn't occurred yet, a rift seems inevitable (Drop the T!) A rift within transactivism also seems inevitable. It's already bubbling up in the truscum v tucute. If you can say you're trans without any form of transitioning, that is a direct contradiction to the position of the necessity of transitioning because your brain "doesn't match" or whatever.
I'm an old lady by Reddit standards. I think a lot of people who identify as trans or queer will grow out of it. It's a new form of teenage rebellion and self expression. When I was a teenager, it was certain music and fashion scenes to assert our individuality and freak out our parents. When my sister was a teenager, the alternative girls all identified as bi with bi being defined as making out with girls while you are drunk aka not bi, now we have this hot mess.
Men will not experience the same bullying that women do, however the "my penis is female, have sex with me" will not jive with a lot of men. But, most TIMs are heterosexual, so again, women will have to deal with that crap more. A lot of conservative men and anti-feminists who aren't specifically MRAs can see that trans-logic makes no sense. A lot of the anti-feminist stuff I have seen is actually anti-stereotypical libfem. I don't think they'd like fully embrace GC or anything, but there are people on both sides that see this is completely bonkers.
What a ridiculous OP. Throwing 'brown' people and jews out of our nation is not the equivalent of 'genociding them'...no matter how hard you try to make this IDIOTIC correlation.
Of the nations that are currently invading the USA and Europe...it is only Whites that are being displaced and their genocide actively planned for buy parasitic jews and corporate globalist; all of these invading races who are being used against us as weapons all have tons of back up populations in their own Homelands. Even if we killed them all in the USA, there is still no threat that they would be genocided, because they have an entire homeland FULL of their own people.
I've fallen into the peaktrans front hole and I just can't believe the madness that has been spewed. Transwomen are now ciswomen with penises? Lesbians not sleeping with transwomen is transphobic and literal violence? Menstruation and vaginas are triggering and cause some transwomen heart palpitations? ANYONE who says they feel like a woman should have access to women's only spaces? And people aren't allowed to question any of this?
The worst thing is that women go to bat for transwomen for woke points and are disrespected in return. So do you think the current state of this movement is sustainable? It's easy to feel powerful when bullying women. Will these ideas be able to survive when men start to experience the same kind of bullying that women do? Will TRAs even go after men? How will men react when the women that they care about start being harrassed? Or will men not care at all, and transwomen will become the new (and improved) ciswomen, while ciswomen with vaginas will be othered?
I notice that South Asians are much less conformist, less risk adverse, more bold, confrontational and more verbally competent than mongoloid asians on average.
Each study is slightly different but overall they pretty much say the same thing (and there are tons of sites you can find via Google) Africa - big, East Asia - small, and everywhere else - pretty much in between.
Average height and weight varies by a lot also. I think Scandinavians are on average almost a foot taller than Japanese. Head size varies by race as does average boob size. It's actually really interesting to look into the genetic differences of the various races.
[Image transcript: A man in a blank white mask with the memetic "Shakira" sex doll by his side, and a woman in the also memetic "autistic screeching" pose in the background. The sex doll asks "Master, why is the Organic Female so Angry?", the man replies "Ignore her, baby, she's just jealous". The woman is screaming "Come Back HERE!", "Sex robots normalize violence", "Sex doll [sic] can be raped", "PATHETIC VIRGIN!!", "Sex robots epitomize patriarchy", and "Threat of female independence!".]
(BooLord)
Getting ripped by my own (Chan) Classmates for the prospect of a school asian society
Heya I'm a 16 year old and for my school I'm proposing an asian society since an African society already exists. I've been told it's a bad idea by two kids in my year. One is a stereotypical nerdy chinese guy who's basically a Chan (he laughs it off when there's racism against him). Another is a more confident asian guy who hangs out with popular white guys but he says the idea is retarded and i should go "kms" and he says none of the asians will join. He may as well be white cos he pretty much acts white and will always go to the side of his white friends over asians. So yeah I'm kind of in a dilemma.....
(toasted_breadcrumbs)
Unfortunately most Asian kids won't be woke in high school, if they ever get there. Don't listen to them: start the club and invite the other Asian kids and set an example of Asian leadership and pride in their identity even in the face of adversity.
(archelogy)
You're ahead of the curve. Most won't get there until at least college, if not later. If you can get a few Asians who are not sellouts (seek white approval) or utterly oblivious of racial dynamics (low emotional intelligence, common among nerds), that should be a realistic goal. Getting a majority to approve of it isn't.
Gus Kenworthy saved 90 dogs from dog farm in Korea , He says "culture should never be a scapegoat for cruelty " Kal Penn says thank you to him .
(blueandredwithblack)
These people should worry more about the fact that white “culture” literally allows for school shootings, beheading of foreigners, massive industrial animal abuse, and mistreatment of racial minorities. If they address those, and actively do something about it, they have my own personal permission to bitch about problems in Korea. But before then, they can fuck right off to their shithole of a country.
(No_NSFW_at_Work)
But it's ok to sanction NK more, drive it to famine, and blame the regim. Ok. They treat dogs better than human
(MostEpicRedditor)
God the CPC needs to crack down on PETA degenerates in China/Hong Kong. Take your intolerance somewhere else. Or shove it up your ass
(No_NSFW_at_Work)
Why don't he go save some dogs and cat in Switzerland? Oh because if youre white you're right
(stopwhitegayracists)
Gus kenworthy partied with the sultan of Brunei. The Brunei regime murders lgbt southeast Asians but that obviously is never talked about by white gay liberal celebrities and the liberal media since they hate us Asians. There is such racism and hatred towards gay Asians from the lgbt community. LGBT white celebrities and the liberal media are silent about Gus kenworthy partying with the sultan of Brunei since only lgbt southeast Asians are being murdered and not white lgbt ones. Meanwhile, a white gay twink can post a sad video on YouTube about how he is being bullied and they will collectively freak out adpnd yell about how oppressed white gay guys are.
It was really sick how the liberal media and white gay guys were calling the North Korean sister of Kim Jong in the shade queen and the queen of diplomacy since they really hate vp pence. They bashed vp pence since a white gay ice skater named Adam rip on was feuding with vp pence. They freak out when a white gay guy complains but they are completely fine with the North Korean regime murdering Koreans, some of whom are obviously lgbt. The liberal media and white gay community is that racist to Asians and lgbt Asians.
(rubbish_everywhere)
So Kal Penn hates his East and southeast Asian brethren?
(JustAThrowaway1020)
It sucks that when a white person does this he is celebrated by everyone. It is only a small population of Koreans that eat dog meat. In reality, everyday, throughout the year, regular Koreans are trying to get these dogs out of the markets and coordinating with rescues to send them overseas. No one talks about them. Same shit happens with China and the Yulin Festival. So many stories of ordinary Chinese folks who don’t make much, but pull together all they have in order to buy the dogs and prevent their deaths. No one hears about that.
(xuankun)
Ok I think we are jumping to conclusions a bit too fast here guys. The post talked about how it wasn’t his place to enforce cultural norms on Korea, just prevent animal cruelty. It’s no different than some dude doing he same with cows or pigs in the US.
We need to pick our battles. Defending animal cruelty isn’t one we are going to win.
(chopsticko)
no no no no no no, don't be fooled, he prefaces with that, but proceeds to say otherwise. This is more than just animal cruelty, this is western whites dictating that their selection of animals to eat (or be kind to) as superior. People from Korea or Asia don't come to the US to rescue chickens, cows or pigs from cruel conditions, do they?
(xuankun)
No I suppose they don’t, but it’s not Korean culture to keep any of those animals as pets.
I don’t really see where in his post that he implies western superiority.
(chopsticko)
implied in op title and in his post via 'culture should never be a scapegoat for cruelty'
I think this is the correct response.
As harsh as it sounds, I want little children to remember the day Obama and Hillary were executed.
It's the best way to ensure this never happens again, if we ensure people never forget.
We need the history books to be full of images of Obama and Hillary's execution.
