I came to astrology in recent years and take issue with the discussion because everyone wants to refute it, but no one wants to investigate it. The point of becoming a scientist is to answer questions of the unknown; to assume science already knows everything is obviously false. In regard to this particular debate, neither side knows what they're talking about in terms of how astrology works, they just know how it makes them feel. There is a lot of poor information about astrology that dilutes the truth, but the same can go for almost anything. I would have loved to be on this debate because I'm not delusional - I understand the science of astronomy but also understand the potential soft science of astrology. It is a soft science, and the more it's studied, the more will come from it. It doesn't help that we have "scientists" that just dismiss it. I would have done a much better job explaining astrology without looking like an "energy" nutcase.