Coercion of lesbians to accept sexual partners with penises is supported by Stonewall's re-definition of same-sex orientation as "same gender" orientation. Hence Nancy Kelley calling Lesbians "sexual racists" for rejecting male sexual partners.
12 comments
@Croquemitaine #137757
You get the occasional predator, gender immaterial, who uses their status as an outgroup X member to insist that “the reason you won't have sex with me is you're prejudiced against X.”
It's a common enough tactic that I've run into three variations on X in my years, and yes, one was you must be transphobic if.
A certain percentage of people suck, no matter how they identify.
Fingers. Tongues. Vibrators. Strapons. And in your instance, especially the latter.
Guess who's the bottom in this 'argument', OP...!
@Vocheka2 #137769
People can be assholes who blame and insult you for not indulging their desires, news at 11. This does not at all give the OP and others like them a good reason to then blame EVERYONE sharing such identities for being like that and therefore implying that these identities are bad or untrue, that’s multiple jumps in logic they do here to justify their hate.
Also, the Stonewall riots, led by black transwomen, started the civil rights movement for lesbians just as much as it did for gay men, transpeople and other LGBT+ groups. So degrading and misremembering them only helps our common enemies, and it frankly disgusts me that a group of LGB people seem to fall for it, paving the way for their own renewed oppression.
I’ve seen what happens when lesbian TERFS end up in trans-friendly WLW (Women-Loving-Women) spaces - they stubbornly misinterpret things like “you should accept that trans women are women” as things along the lines of “you should accept a TIM (Trans-Identified Male) inserting his penis inside you whenever he feels like” no matter how much anyone tries to correct them. I mean, every meaningful subset of humans contains garbage people (unless the definition of said subset specifically excludes “garbage people”), so I have no doubt that somebody is saying something like that somewhere… but there’s no way that it’s anywhere near common. And I really, really doubt that the Stonewall Charity is officially pro-lesbian-rape.
“Coercion of lesbians to accept sexual partners with penises is supported by Stonewall's re-definition of same-sex orientation as "same gender" orientation.”
How the hell does a ‘definition’ coerce sex? I can define myself as the most appropriate partner for Eva Green, she’s still not going to return my calls.
Coercion of lesbians to accept sexual partners with penises
Nobody is actually doing that, sweetheart, so anything further you have to say about the matter should be summarily dismissed if not outright ridiculed.
Also, I believe this warrants a #conspiracy tag, so I gave it one.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.